首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到10条相似文献,搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
Under study is the complexity status of the independent set problem in a class of connected graphs that are defined by functional constraints on the number of edges depending on the number of vertices. For every natural number C, this problem is shown to be polynomially solvable in the class of graphs
èn = 1 { G:|V(G)| = n,|E(G)| \leqslant n + C[log2 (n)]} . \bigcup\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\{ G:|V(G)| = n,|E(G)| \leqslant n + C[\log _2 (n)]\} .}  相似文献   

2.
We have obtained a recurrence formula $I_{n+3} = \frac{4(n+3)}{\pi(n+4)}VI_{n+1}We have obtained a recurrence formula In+3 = \frac4(n+3)p(n+4)VIn+1I_{n+3} = \frac{4(n+3)}{\pi(n+4)}VI_{n+1} for integro-geometric moments in the case of a circle with the area V, where In = ò\nolimitsK ?Gsnd GI_n = \int \nolimits_{K \cap G}\sigma^{n}{\rm d} G, while in the case of a convex domain K with the perimeter S and area V the recurrence formula
In+3 = \frac8(n+3)V2(n+1)(n+4)p[\fracd In+1d V - \fracIn+1S \fracd Sd V ] I_{n+3} = \frac{8(n+3)V^2}{(n+1)(n+4)\pi}\Big[\frac{{\rm d} I_{n+1}}{{\rm d} V} - \frac{I_{n+1}}{S} \frac{{\rm d} S}{{\rm d} V} \Big]  相似文献   

3.
Summary. Let F, Y \Phi, \Psi be strictly monotonic continuous functions, F,G be positive functions on an interval I and let n ? \Bbb N \{1} n \in {\Bbb N} \setminus \{1\} . The functional equation¶¶F-1 ([(?i=1nF(xi)F(xi))/(?i=1n F(xi)]) Y-1 ([(?i=1nY(xi)G(xi))/(?i=1n G(xi))])  (x1,?,xn ? I) \Phi^{-1}\,\left({\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\Phi(x_{i})F(x_{i})\over\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} F(x_{i}}\right) \Psi^{-1}\,\left({\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\Psi(x_{i})G(x_{i})\over\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} G(x_{i})}\right)\,\,(x_{1},\ldots,x_{n} \in I) ¶was solved by Bajraktarevi' [3] for a fixed n 3 3 n\ge 3 . Assuming that the functions involved are twice differentiable he proved that the above functional equation holds if and only if¶¶Y(x) = [(aF(x) + b)/(cF(x) + d)],       G(x) = kF(x)(cF(x) + d) \Psi(x) = {a\Phi(x)\,+\,b\over c\Phi(x)\,+\,d},\qquad G(x) = kF(x)(c\Phi(x) + d) ¶where a,b,c,d,k are arbitrary constants with k(c2+d2)(ad-bc) 1 0 k(c^2+d^2)(ad-bc)\ne 0 . Supposing the functional equation for all n = 2,3,... n = 2,3,\dots Aczél and Daróczy [2] obtained the same result without differentiability conditions.¶The case of fixed n = 2 is, as in many similar problems, much more difficult and allows considerably more solutions. Here we assume only that the same functional equation is satisfied for n = 2 and solve it under the supposition that the functions involved are six times differentiable. Our main tool is the deduction of a sixth order differential equation for the function j = F°Y-1 \varphi = \Phi\circ\Psi^{-1} . We get 32 new families of solutions.  相似文献   

4.
We investigate properties of entire solutions of differential equations of the form
znw(n) + ?j = n - m + 1n - 1 an - j + 1(j)zjw(j) + ?j = 0n - m ( an - j - m + 1(j)zm + an - j + 1(j) )zjw(j) = 0, {z^n}{w^{(n)}} + \sum\limits_{j = n - m + 1}^{n - 1} {a_{n - j + 1}^{(j)}{z^j}{w^{(j)}}} + \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n - m} {\left( {a_{n - j - m + 1}^{(j)}{z^m} + a_{n - j + 1}^{(j)}} \right){z^j}{w^{(j)}}} = 0,  相似文献   

5.
A set S of vertices in a graph G is a connected dominating set if every vertex not in S is adjacent to some vertex in S and the subgraph induced by S is connected. The connected domination number γ c (G) is the minimum size of such a set. Let d*(G)=min{d(G),d([`(G)])}{\delta^*(G)={\rm min}\{\delta(G),\delta({\overline{G}})\}} , where [`(G)]{{\overline{G}}} is the complement of G and δ(G) is the minimum vertex degree. We prove that when G and [`(G)]{{\overline{G}}} are both connected, gc(G)+gc([`(G)]) £ d*(G)+4-(gc(G)-3)(gc([`(G)])-3){{\gamma_c}(G)+{\gamma_c}({\overline{G}})\le \delta^*(G)+4-({\gamma_c}(G)-3)({\gamma_c}({\overline{G}})-3)} . As a corollary, gc(G)+gc([`(G)]) £ \frac3n4{{\gamma_c}(G)+{\gamma_c}({\overline{G}})\le \frac{3n}{4}} when δ*(G) ≥ 3 and n ≥ 14, where G has n vertices. We also prove that gc(G)+gc([`(G)]) £ d*(G)+2{{\gamma_c}(G)+{\gamma_c}({\overline{G}})\le \delta^*(G)+2} when gc(G),gc([`(G)]) 3 4{{\gamma_c}(G),{\gamma_c}({\overline{G}})\ge 4} . This bound is sharp when δ*(G) = 6, and equality can only hold when δ*(G) = 6. Finally, we prove that gc(G)gc([`(G)]) £ 2n-4{{\gamma_c}(G){\gamma_c}({\overline{G}})\le 2n-4} when n ≥ 7, with equality only for paths and cycles.  相似文献   

6.
We study self-adjoint bounded Jacobi operators of the form:
(Jy)(n) = any(n + 1) + bny(n) + an-1y(n- 1)(\mathbf{J}\psi)(n) = a_{n}\psi(n + 1) + b_{n}\psi(n) + a_{n-1}\psi(n- 1)  相似文献   

7.
Abstract. For natural numbers n we inspect all factorizations n = ab of n with aba \le b in \Bbb N\Bbb N and denote by n=an bnn=a_n b_n the most quadratic one, i.e. such that bn - anb_n - a_n is minimal. Then the quotient k(n) : = an/bn\kappa (n) := a_n/b_n is a measure for the quadraticity of n. The best general estimate for k(n)\kappa (n) is of course very poor: 1/n £ k(n) £ 11/n \le \kappa (n)\le 1. But a Theorem of Hall and Tenenbaum [1, p. 29], implies(logn)-d-e £ k(n) £ (logn)-d(\log n)^{-\delta -\varepsilon } \le \kappa (n) \le (\log n)^{-\delta } on average, with d = 1 - (1+log2  2)/log2=0,08607 ?\delta = 1 - (1+\log _2 \,2)/\log 2=0,08607 \ldots and for every e > 0\varepsilon >0. Hence the natural numbers are fairly quadratic.¶k(n)\kappa (n) characterizes a specific optimal factorization of n. A quadraticity measure, which is more global with respect to the prime factorization of n, is k*(n): = ?1 £ ab, ab=n a/b\kappa ^*(n):= \textstyle\sum\limits \limits _{1\le a \le b, ab=n} a/b. We show k*(n) ~ \frac 12\kappa ^*(n) \sim \frac {1}{2} on average, and k*(n)=W(2\frac 12(1-e) log n/log 2n)\kappa ^*(n)=\Omega (2^{\frac {1}{2}(1-\varepsilon ) {\log}\, n/{\log} _2n})for every e > 0\varepsilon>0.  相似文献   

8.
Let H be a multigraph, possibly containing loops. An H-subdivision is any simple graph obtained by replacing the edges of H with paths of arbitrary length. Let H be an arbitrary multigraph of order k, size m, n 0(H) isolated vertices and n 1(H) vertices of degree one. In Gould and Whalen (Graphs Comb. 23:165–182, 2007) it was shown that if G is a simple graph of order n containing an H-subdivision H{\mathcal{H}} and d(G) 3 \fracn+m-k+n1(H)+2n0(H)2{\delta(G) \ge \frac{n+m-k+n_1(H)+2n_0(H)}{2}}, then G contains a spanning H-subdivision with the same ground set as H{\mathcal{H}} . As a corollary to this result, the authors were able to obtain Dirac’s famed theorem on hamiltonian graphs; namely that if G is a graph of order n ≥ 3 with d(G) 3 \fracn2{\delta(G)\ge\frac{n}{2}} , then G is hamiltonian. Bondy (J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 11:80–84, 1971) extended Dirac’s theorem by showing that if G satisfied the condition d(G) 3 \fracn2{\delta(G) \ge \frac{n}{2}} then G was either pancyclic or a complete bipartite graph. In this paper, we extend the result from Gould and Whalen (Graphs Comb. 23:165–182, 2007) in a similar manner. An H-subdivision H{\mathcal{H}} in G is 1-extendible if there exists an H-subdivision H*{\mathcal{H}^{*}} with the same ground set as H{\mathcal{H}} and |H*| = |H| + 1{|\mathcal{H}^{*}| = |\mathcal{H}| + 1} . If every H-subdivision in G is 1-extendible, then G is pan-H-linked. We demonstrate that if H is sufficiently dense and G is a graph of large enough order n such that d(G) 3 \fracn+m-k+n1(H)+2n0(H)2{\delta(G) \ge \frac{n+m-k+n_1(H)+2n_0(H)}{2}} , then G is pan-H-linked. This result is sharp.  相似文献   

9.
Recently, the first author generalized a formula of Nekrasov and Okounkov which gives a combinatorial formula, in terms of hook lengths of partitions, for the coefficients of certain power series. In the course of this investigation, he conjectured that a(n) = 0 if and only if b(n) = 0, where integers a(n) and b(n) are defined by
?n=0 a(n)xn : = ?n=1  (1-xn)8,\sum^{\infty}_{n=0}\, a(n)x^{n} := \prod^{\infty}_{n=1} \, (1-x^{n})^8,  相似文献   

10.
We shall present short proofs for type II (simultaneous) Hermite–Padé approximations of the generalized hypergeometric and q-hypergeometric series
F(t)=?n=0\frac?k=0n-1P(k)?k=0n-1Q(k)tn,       Fq(t)=?n=0\frac?k=0n-1P(qk)?k=0n-1Q(qk)tn,F(t)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}P(k)}{\prod _{k=0}^{n-1}Q(k)}t^n,\qquad F_q(t)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}P(q^k)}{\prod _{k=0}^{n-1}Q(q^k)}t^n,  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号