Assessing dynamic inefficiency of the Spanish construction sector pre- and post-financial crisis

This paper undertakes the full decomposition of dynamic cost inefficiency into technical, scale and allocative inefficiency based on the dynamic directional distance function. The empirical application estimates dynamic inefficiency in the Spanish construction industry before and during the current financial crisis over the period 2001–2009. Static inefficiency measures are biased in a context of a significant economic crisis with large investments and disinvestments as they do not account for costs in the adjustment of quasi-fixed factors. Allocative inefficiency is smaller, while technical inefficiency is larger when using the dynamic compared to the static framework. Results further indicate that overall dynamic cost inefficiency is very high with technical inefficiency being the largest component, followed by allocative and scale inefficiency. Moreover, overall dynamic cost inefficiency is significantly larger before the beginning of the financial crisis than during the financial crisis. Larger firms are less technically and scale inefficient than smaller firms on average, but have more problems in choosing the mix of inputs that minimizes their long-term costs. Firms that went bankrupt, on average, have a higher overall dynamic cost inefficiency and scale inefficiency than continuing firms.     

Estimating technical and allocative efficiency in the public sector: A nonparametric analysis of Dutch schools

Public sector output provision is influenced not only by discretionary inputs but also by exogenous environmental factors. In this paper, we extended the literature by developing a conditional DEA estimator of allocative efficiency that allows a decomposition of overall cost efficiency into allocative and technical components while simultaneously controlling for the environment. We apply the model to analyze technical and allocative efficiency of Dutch secondary schools. The results reveal that allocative efficiency represents a significant 37 percent of overall cost efficiency on average, although technical inefficiency is still the dominant part. Furthermore, the results show that the impact of environment largely differs between schools and that having a more unfavorable environment is very expensive to schools. These results highlight the importance of including environmental variables in both technical and allocative efficiency analysis.     

Resolving a strange case of efficiency

In a recent paper in the Journal of the Operational Research Society, Tone proposes an alternative to the Farrell cost efficiency index to avoid the ‘strange case’ problem in which firms with identical inputs and outputs but with input prices differing by some factor (eg, one has input prices twice another) will have the same Farrell cost efficiency. We provide an alternative cost efficiency indicator that avoids this problem, allows for decomposition into technical and allocative efficiency, and is easily estimated using DEA type models.     

Decomposing technical inefficiency using the principle of least action

In for-profit organizations, profit efficiency decomposition is considered important since estimates on profit drivers are of practical use to managers in their decision making. Profit efficiency is traditionally due to two sources – technical efficiency and allocative efficiency. The contribution of this paper is a novel decomposition of technical efficiency that could be more practical to use if the firm under evaluation really wants to achieve technical efficiency as soon as possible. For this purpose, we show how a new version of the Measure of Inefficiency Proportions (MIP), which seeks the minimization of the total technical effort by the assessed firm, is a lower bound of the value of technical inefficiency associated with the directional distance function. The targets provided by the new MIP could be beneficial for firms since it specifies how firms may become technically efficient simply by decreasing one input or increasing one output, suggesting that each firm should focus its effort on a specific dimension (input or output). This approach is operationalized in a data envelopment analysis framework and applied to a dataset of airlines.     

Estimating output gains by means of Luenberger efficiency measures

In this paper we propose a new measure of input allocative efficiency that we estimate using directional distance functions. Our new measure compares the gain in output if a firm reduces technical inefficiency for the direct production possibility set and the gain in output if the firm reduces technical inefficiency for the indirect production possibility set. Because the directional distance function uses a translated origin, the gain in output from an optimal reallocation of inputs can be estimated for non-radial expansions in output. We estimate efficiency for Japanese banks during 1992–1999. The gains in outputs from reducing allocative inefficiency by reallocating inputs are greater than the gains in outputs that can be attained by reducing technical inefficiency.     

Industry structural inefficiency and potential gains from mergers and break-ups: A comprehensive approach

An efficiency indicator of industry configuration (allowing for entry/exit of firms) is presented which accounts for four sources components: (1) size inefficiencies arising from firms which can be conveniently split into smaller units; (2) efficiency gains realized through merger of firms; (3) re-allocation of inputs and outputs among firms; (4) technical inefficiencies. The indicator and its components are computed using linear and mixed-integer programming (data envelopment analysis models). A method to monitor the evolution of these components in time is introduced. Data on hospitals in Australia show that technical inefficiency of hospitals accounts for less than 15% of total industry inefficiency, with 40% attributable to size inefficiencies and the rest to potential mergers and re-allocation effects.     

Evolution of bank efficiency in Brazil: A DEA approach

This paper investigates cost, technical and allocative efficiencies for Brazilian banks in the recent period (2000–2007). We use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to compute efficiency scores. Brazilian banks were found to have low levels of economic (cost) efficiency compared to banks in Europe and in the US. For the period with high macroeconomic volatility (2000–2002) the economic inefficiency in Brazilian banks can be attributed mainly to technical inefficiency rather than allocative inefficiency. State-owned banks are significantly more cost efficient than foreign, private domestic and private with foreign participation. There is no evidence of differences in economic efficiency due to type of activity and bank size. These results may provide some useful guidance for financial regulators and bank managers.     

Developing a decomposable measure of profit efficiency using DEA

In for-profit organizations efficiency measurement with reference to the potential for profit augmentation is particularly important as is its decomposition into technical, and allocative components. Different profit efficiency approaches can be found in the literature to measure and decompose overall profit efficiency. In this paper, we highlight some problems within existing approaches and propose a new measure of profit efficiency based on a geometric mean of input/output adjustments needed for maximizing profits. Overall profit efficiency is calculated through this efficiency measure and is decomposed into its technical and allocative components. Technical efficiency is calculated based on a non-oriented geometric distance function (GDF) that is able to incorporate all the sources of inefficiency, while allocative efficiency is retrieved residually. We also define a measure of profitability efficiency which complements profit efficiency in that it makes it possible to retrieve the scale efficiency of a unit as a component of its profitability efficiency. In addition, the measure of profitability efficiency allows for a dual profitability interpretation of the GDF measure of technical efficiency. The concepts introduced in the paper are illustrated using a numerical example.     

An overall measure of technical inefficiency at the firm and at the industry level: The ‘lost profit on outlay’

As a measure of overall technical inefficiency, the Directional Distance Function (DDF) introduced by Chambers, Chung, and Färe ties the potential output expansion and input contraction together through a single parameter. By duality, the DDF is related to a measure of profit inefficiency, which is calculated as the normalized deviation between optimal and actual profit at market prices. As we show, in the most usual case, the associated normalization represents the sum of the actual revenue and the actual cost of the assessed firm. Consequently, the corresponding profit inefficiency measure associated with the DDF has no obvious economic interpretation. In contrast, in this paper we allow outputs to expand and inputs to contract by different proportions. This results in a modified DDF that retains most of the properties of the original DDF. The corresponding dual problem has a much simpler interpretation as the lost profit on (average) outlay that can be decomposed into a technical and an allocative inefficiency component. In addition, an overall measure of technical inefficiency at the industry level is introduced resorting to the direction corresponding to the average input–output bundle.     

Technical and allocative efficiency in European banking

This paper specifies an empirical framework for estimating both technical and allocative efficiency using the translog cost-share system, thus providing a solution to the issue known in the literature as the Greene problem. The model is applied to a large panel of European banks and the results are compared with those of a model that does not include an allocative inefficiency term and also with those obtained by using a consistent Bayesian technique. Our results suggest that models which include only technical efficiency, significantly overestimate it, while parameter estimates from the model that includes both technical and allocative efficiency are very close to the ones obtained from the Bayesian approach, thus enhancing our confidence in the proposed methodology. Finally, the fact that allocative efficiency of banks in our sample improves more than technical efficiency underlines the importance of including an allocative inefficiency component in parametric efficiency models.     

Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Cost Function Using Data Envelopment Analysis: an Application to the AT&T Divestiture

This study develops a new use of data envelopment analysis for estimating a stochastic frontier cost function that is assumed to have two different error components: a one-sided disturbance (representing technical and allocative inefficiencies) and a two-sided disturbance (representing an observational error). The two error components are handled by data envelopment analysis in combination with goal programming/constrained regression. The approach proposed in this study can avoid several statistical assumptions used in conventional methods for estimating a stochastic frontier function. As an important application, this study uses the estimation technique to obtain an AT&T stochastic frontier cost function. As a result, this study measures technical and allocative efficiencies of AT&T production process and review its natural monopoly issue. The estimated stochastic frontier cost function is also compared with the other cost function models used for previous studies concerning the divestiture of the telephone industry.     

Cost efficiency and scale economies in general dental practices in the US: a non-parametric and parametric analysis of Colorado data

This paper uses both the non-parametric method of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the econometric method of stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to study the production technology and cost efficiency of the US dental care industry using practice level data. The American Dental Association 2006 survey data for a number of general dental practices in the state of Colorado in the US are used for the empirical analysis. The findings suggest that the cost efficiency score is between 0.79 and 0.87, on average, and the cost inefficiency is mostly due to allocative rather than technical inefficiency. The optimal output level for a dental practice to fully exploit the economies of scale is estimated to be at $1.68 million. Average cost at this level of output is 50.6 cents for each dollar of gross billing generated. The DEA and SFA approaches provide generally consistent results.     

Economic inefficiency measurement of input spending when decision-making units face different input prices

In a recent paper, Kaoru Tone (J Opl Res Soc (2002) 2: 429–444) showed that when the Farrell measure of cost efficiency is estimated for two firms that have different input prices, a firm with higher costs can be deemed more efficient than a firm with lower costs. As an alternative approach, Tone proposed a radial cost efficiency measure that is estimated using levels of spending on each input, rather than input quantities. Thus, firms with higher costs are less efficient than firms with lower costs. In this paper, we extend Tone's approach by allowing for non-radial changes in spending. Our approach builds on earlier work by Luenberger (J Math Econ (1992) 21: 461–481) and Chambers et al (J Econ Theo (1996) 70: 407–419) who use directional distance functions to measure inefficiency. We provide an example and illustration of our approach using Japanese bank data.     

A generalized inefficiency model with input and output dependence

In this paper we propose a general inefficiency model, in the sense that technical inefficiency is, simultaneously, a function of all inputs, outputs, and contextual variables. We recognize that change in inefficiency is endogenous or rational, and we propose an adjustment costs model with firm-specific but unknown adjustment cost parameters. When inefficiency depends on inputs and outputs, the firm's optimization problem changes as the first order conditions must take into account the dependence of inefficiency on the endogenous variables of the problem. The new formulation introduces statistical challenges which are successfully resolved. The model is estimated using Maximum Simulated Likelihood and an empirical application to U.S. banking is provided.     

Estimating indirect allocative inefficiency and productivity change

Building on the method used in previous indirect production studies, we construct an indicator of indirect output allocative inefficiency. Our indicator equals the difference between a revenue-constrained directional input distance function and a directional input distance function that depends on outputs, rather than revenue. The indicator measures the overuse of inputs that occurs when firms do not choose a revenue maximizing mix of outputs. Adding a time dimension allows productivity change to be measured. In an empirical illustration of our method we find that Japanese banks use, between 2% and 7%, too many inputs because bank outputs are inefficiently allocated.     

Primal and dual dynamic Luenberger productivity indicators

This paper develops primal and dual versions of the dynamic Luenberger productivity growth measures that are based on the dynamic directional distance function and intertemporal cost minimization, respectively. The empirical application focuses on panel data of Dutch dairy farms over the period 1995–2005. Primal dynamic Luenberger productivity growth averages 1.5 percent annually in the period under investigation, with technical change being the main driver of annual change. Dual dynamic Luenberger productivity growth is −0.1 percent in the same period. Improvements in technical inefficiency and technical change are partly counteracted by deteriorations of allocative inefficiency, with large dairy farms presenting a slightly higher productivity growth than small dairy farms.     

A generalized DEA model for centralized resource allocation

In this paper, we introduced a new generalized centralized resource allocation model which extends Lozano and Villa’s and Asmild et al.’s models to a more general case. In order to uncover the sources of such total input contraction in the generalized centralized resource allocation model, we applied the structural efficiency to further decompose it into three components: the aggregate technical efficiency, the aggregate allocative efficiency and re-transferable efficiency components. The proposed models are not only flexible enough for the central decision-maker to adjust the inputs and outputs to achieve the total input contraction but also identify the sources of such total input contraction, thereby giving rise to an important interpretation and understanding of the generalized centralized resource allocation model. Finally, an empirical example is used to illustrate the approach.     

Cost allocation and convex data envelopment

This paper considers allocation rules. First, we demonstrate that costs allocated by the Aumann–Shapley and the Friedman–Moulin cost allocation rules are easy to determine in practice using convex envelopment of registered cost data and parametric programming. Second, from the linear programming problems involved it becomes clear that the allocation rules, technically speaking, allocate the non-zero value of the dual variable for a convexity constraint on to the output vector. Hence, the allocation rules can also be used to allocate inefficiencies in non-parametric efficiency measurement models such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The convexity constraint of the BCC model introduces a non-zero slack in the objective function of the multiplier problem and we show that the cost allocation rules discussed in this paper can be used as candidates to allocate this slack value on to the input (or output) variables and hence enable a full allocation of the inefficiency on to the input (or output) variables as in the CCR model.     

Accounting for slacks to measure and decompose revenue efficiency in the Spanish Designation of Origin wines with DEA

In this paper, we show how Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) may be used to measure and decompose revenue inefficiency, taking into account all sources of technical waste in the context of an application to assess the Spanish quality wine sector, in particular Designation of Origin (DO) wines. We try to go beyond the standard approaches, which use Shephard distance functions or directional distance functions, to provide decomposition that incorporates slacks as a source of technical inefficiency. To accomplish this, we will base our analysis on a recent approach introduced in Cooper et al. (2011a). In particular, we show how an output-oriented version of the Weighted Additive model can be used to properly identify revenue, technical, and allocative inefficiencies in Spanish DOs. In the application, we conclude that the main source of revenue inefficiency in this sector is technical waste, and that Cava can be highlighted as the DO that performs as a benchmark for more numbers of units.     

Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis

This paper replaces ordinary DEA formulations with stochastic counterparts in the form of a series of chance constrained programming models. Emphasis is on technical efficiencies and inefficiencies which do not require costs or prices, but which are nevertheless basic in that the achievement of technical efficiency is necessary for the attainment of ‘allocative’, ‘cost’ and other types of efficiencies.