A coding method for a sequent calculus of propositional logic

The paper deals with a coding method for a sequent calculus of the propositional logic. The method is based on the sequent calculus. It allows us to determine if a formula is derivable in the calculus without constructing a derivation tree. The main advantage of the coding method is its compactness in comparison with derivation trees of the sequent calculus. The coding method can be used as a decision procedure for the propositional logic.     

A fuzzy logic for an ordinal sum t-norm

Among the class of residuated fuzzy logics, a few of them have been shown to have standard completeness both for propositional and predicate calculus, like Gödel, NM and monoidal t-norm-based logic systems. In this paper, a new residuated logic NMG, which aims at capturing the tautologies of a class of ordinal sum t-norms and their residua, is introduced and its standard completeness both for propositional calculus and for predicate calculus are proved.     

A hybrid calculus for logic <Emphasis Type="Italic">N</Emphasis><Superscript><Emphasis Type="Italic">*</Emphasis></Superscript>: residual finiteness and decidability

It is proved that logic N ^* is residually finite and decidable. A hybrid calculus for the logic is constructed based on a tabular calculus for intuitionistic logic. It is shown that the hybrid calculus is sound and complete.     

A sequent calculus for logic of knowledge and past time: Completeness and decidability

We consider logic of knowledge and past time. This logic involves the discrete-time linear temporal operators next, until, weak yesterday, and since. In addition, it contains an indexed set of unary modal operators agent i knows.We consider the semantic constraint of the unique initial states for this logic. For the logic, we present a sequent calculus with a restricted cut rule. We prove the soundness and completeness of the sequent calculus presented. We prove the decidability of provability in the considered calculus as well. So, this calculus can be used as a basis for automated theorem proving. The proof method for the completeness can be used to construct complete sequent calculi with a restricted cut rule for this logic with other semantical constraints as well. Published in Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 427–437, July–September, 2006.     

A Sequent Calculus for Propositional Dynamic Logic for Agents with Interactions

We consider a propositional dynamic logic for agents with interactions such as known commitment, no learning, and perfect recall. For this logic, we present a sequent calculus with a restricted cut rule and prove the soundness and completeness for the calculus.__________Published in Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 261–269, April–June, 2005.     

Cut elimination for S4n and K4n with the central agent axiom

We analyze the multimodal logic S4 _n with the central agent axiom. We present a Hilbert-type calculus, then derive a Gentzen-type calculus with cut, and prove a cut-elimination theorem. The work shows that it is possible to construct a cut-free Gentzen-type calculus for this logic. Moreover, it also provides analogous results for the multimodal logic K4 _n with the central agent axiom.     

Loop-free calculus for modal logic S4. II

In [J. Andrikonis, Loop-free calculus for modal logic S4. I, Lith. Math. J., 52(1):1–12, 2012], loop-free calculus for modal logic S4 is presented. The calculus uses several types of indexes to avoid loops and obtain termination of derivation search. Although the mentioned article proves that derivation search in the calculus is finite, the proof of soundness and completeness is omitted and, therefore, is presented in this paper. Moreover, this paper presents loop-free calculus for modal logics K4, which is obtained by modifying the calculus for S4. Finally, some remarks for programming the given calculi are offered.     

A cut-free sequent system for two-dimensional modal logic,and why it matters

The two-dimensional modal logic of Davies and Humberstone (1980) [3] is an important aid to our understanding the relationship between actuality, necessity and a priori knowability. I show how a cut-free hypersequent calculus for 2D modal logic not only captures the logic precisely, but may be used to address issues in the epistemology and metaphysics of our modal concepts. I will explain how the use of our concepts motivates the inference rules of the sequent calculus, and then show that the completeness of the calculus for Davies–Humberstone models explains why those concepts have the structure described by those models. The result is yet another application of the completeness theorem.     

Saturated calculus for Horn-like sequents of a complete class of a linear temporal first order logic

A saturated calculus for the so-called Horn-like sequents of a complete class of a linear temporal logic of the first order is described. The saturated calculus contains neither induction-like postulates nor cut-like rules. Instead of induction-like postulates the saturated calculus contains a finite set of “saturated” sequents, which (1) capture and reflect the periodic structure of inductive reasoning (i.e., a reasoning which applies induction-like postulates); (2) show that “almost nothing new” can be obtained by continuing the process of derivation of a given sequent; (3) present an explicit way of generating the so-called invariant formula in induction-like rules. The saturated calculus for Horn-like sequents allows one: (1) to prove in an obvious way the completeness of a restricted linear temporal logic of the first order; (2) to construct a computer-aided proof system for this logic; (3) to prove the decidability of this logic for logically decidable Horn-like sequents. Bibliography: 15 titles. Translated fromZapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 220, 1995, pp. 123–144. Translated by R. Pliuškevičius.     

Uniform interpolation and the existence of sequent calculi

This paper presents a uniform and modular method to prove uniform interpolation for several intermediate and intuitionistic modal logics. The proof-theoretic method uses sequent calculi that are extensions of the terminating sequent calculus $\mathsf{G4ip}$ for intuitionistic propositional logic. It is shown that whenever the rules in a calculus satisfy certain structural properties, the corresponding logic has uniform interpolation. It follows that the intuitionistic versions of $\mathsf{K}$ and $\mathsf{KD}$ (without the diamond operator) have uniform interpolation. It also follows that no intermediate or intuitionistic modal logic without uniform interpolation has a sequent calculus satisfying those structural properties, thereby establishing that except for the seven intermediate logics that have uniform interpolation, no intermediate logic has such a sequent calculus.     

CUT ELIMINATION FOR PROPOSITIONAL DYNAMIC LOGIC WITHOUT

The aim of this paper is to extend the semantic analysis of tense logic in Rescher/Urquhart [3] to propositional dynamic logic without*. For this we develop a nested sequential calculus whose axioms and rules directly reflect the steps in the semantic analysis. It is shown that this calculus, with the cut rule omitted, is complete with respect to the standard semantics. It follows that cut elimination does hold for this nested sequential calculus. MSC: 03B45.     

A Square of Oppositions in Intuitionistic Logic with Strong Negation

In this paper, we introduce a Hilbert style axiomatic calculus for intutionistic logic with strong negation. This calculus is a preservative extension of intuitionistic logic, but it can express that some falsity are constructive. We show that the introduction of strong negation allows us to define a square of opposition based on quantification on possible worlds.     

Local computation in linear logic

This work deals with the exponential fragment of Girard's linear logic ([3]) without the contraction rule, a logical system which has a natural relation with the direct logic ([10], [7]). A new sequent calculus for this logic is presented in order to remove the weakening rule and recover its behavior via a special treatment of the propositional constants, so that the process of cut-elimination can be performed using only “local” reductions. Hence a typed calculus, which admits only local rewriting rules, can be introduced in a natural manner. Its main properties — normalizability and confluence — has been investigated; moreover this calculus has been proved to satisfy a Curry-Howard isomorphism ([6]) with respect to the logical system in question. MSC: 03B40, 03F05.     

A normalizing system of natural deduction for intuitionistic linear logic

 The main result of this paper is a normalizing system of natural deduction for the full language of intuitionistic linear logic. No explicit weakening or contraction rules for -formulas are needed. By the systematic use of general elimination rules a correspondence between normal derivations and cut-free derivations in sequent calculus is obtained. Normalization and the subformula property for normal derivations follow through translation to sequent calculus and cut-elimination. Received: 10 October 2000 / Revised version: 26 July 2001 / Published online: 2 September 2002 Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 03F52, 03F05 Keywords or phrases: Linear logic – Natural deduction – General elimination rules     

PSPACE complexity of modal logic <Emphasis Type="Italic">K D</Emphasis>45<Subscript>n</Subscript>

We study sequent calculus for multi-modal logic K D45_n and its complexity. We introduce a loop-check free sequent calculus. Loop-check is eliminated by using the marked modal operator □_i^•, which is used as an alternative to sequents with histories ([8], [3], [5]). All inference rules are invertible or semi-invertible. To get this, we use or branches beside common and branches. We prove the equivalence between known sequent calculus and our newly introduced efficient sequent calculus. We concentrate on the complexity analysis of the introduced sequent calculus for multi-modal logic K D45_n. We prove that the space complexity of the given calculus is polynomial (O(l ³)). We show the maximum height of the constructed derivation tree that leads to the reduction of the time and space complexity. We present a decision algorithm for multi-modal logic K D45_n and some nontrivial examples to improve the introduced loop-check free sequent calculus.     

Loop-free calculus for modal logic S4. I

In the article, loop-free calculus for modal logic S4 is presented. To restrict applications of reflexivity and transitivity rules, several types of indexes are used. The use of indexes replaces the need to keep the history of previous applications of the rules. The article details the purpose of each type of index and proves that derivation search in the calculus is finite.     

Completeness of two systems of illative combinatory logic for first-order propositional and predicate calculus

Illative combinatory logic consists of the theory of combinators or lambda calculus extended by extra constants (and corresponding axioms and rules) intended to capture inference. The paper considers 4 systems of illative combinatory logic that are sound for first-order propositional and predicate calculus. The interpretation from ordinary logic into the illative systems can be done in two ways: following the propositions-as-types paradigm, in which derivations become combinators, or in a more direct way, in which derivations are not translated. Both translations are closely related in a canonical way. In a preceding paper, Barendregt, Bunder and Dekkers, 1993, we proved completeness of the two direct translations. In the present paper we prove completeness of the two indirect translations by showing that the corresponding illative systems are conservative over the two systems for the direct translations. In another version, DBB (1997), we shall give a more direct completeness proof. These papers fulfill the program of Church and Curry to base logic on a consistent system of -terms or combinators. Hitherto this program had failed because systems of ICL were either too weak (to provide a sound interpretation) or too strong (sometimes even inconsistent). Received: February 15, 1996     

Infinite-Valued First-Order Łukasiewicz Logic: Hypersequent Calculi Without Structural Rules and Proof Search for Sentences in the Prenex Form

The rational first-order Pavelka logic is an expansion of the infinite-valued first-order ?ukasiewicz logic ?? by truth constants. For this logic, we introduce a cumulative hypersequent calculus G¹?? and a noncumulative hypersequent calculus G²?? without structural inference rules. We compare these calculi with the Baaz–Metcalfe hypersequent calculus G?? with structural rules. In particular, we show that every G??-provable sentence is G¹??-provable and a ??-sentence in the prenex form is G??-provable if and only if it is G²??-provable. For a tableau version of the calculus G²??, we describe a family of proof search algorithms that allow us to construct a proof of each G²??-provable sentence in the prenex form.     

Dual‐Context Sequent Calculus and Strict Implication

We introduce a dual‐context style sequent calculus which is complete with respectto Kripke semantics where implication is interpreted as strict implication in the modal logic K. The cut‐elimination theorem for this calculus is proved by a variant of Gentzen's method.     

The Gödel-McKinsey-Tarski embedding for infinitary intuitionistic logic and its extensions

The Gödel-McKinsey-Tarski embedding allows to view intuitionistic logic through the lenses of modal logic. In this work, an extension of the modal embedding to infinitary intuitionistic logic is introduced. First, a neighborhood semantics for a family of axiomatically presented infinitary modal logics is given and soundness and completeness are proved via the method of canonical models. The semantics is then exploited to obtain a labelled sequent calculus with good structural properties. Next, soundness and faithfulness of the embedding are established by transfinite induction on the height of derivations: the proof is obtained directly without resorting to non-constructive principles. Finally, the modal embedding is employed in order to relate classical, intuitionistic and modal derivability in infinitary logic extended with axioms.