On exponential bases for the Sobolev spaces over an interval

We suppose that K is a countable index set and that $\text{Λ = {λ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{¦ k ? K}}$ is a sequence of distinct complex numbers such that forms a Riesz (strong) basis for L²[a, b], a < b. Let Σ = {σ₁, σ₂,…, σ_m} consist of m complex numbers not in Λ. Then, with p(λ) = Π_{k = 1}^m (λ ? σ_k), forms a Riesz (strong) bas Sobolev space H^m[a, b]. If we take σ₁, σ₂,…, σ_m to be complex numbers already in Λ, then, defining p(λ) as before, forms a Riesz (strong) basis for the space H^?m[a, b]. We also discuss the extension of these results to “generalized exponentials” tⁿe^λ_kt.     

Enumeration of pairs of permutations

Let π = (a₁, a₂, …, a_n), ? = (b₁, b₂, …, b_n) be two permutations of $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {1, 2, …, n}}$. A rise of π is pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i < a_i+1; a fall is a pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i > a_i+1. Thus, for i = 1, 2, …, n ? 1, the two pairs a_i, a_i+1; b_i, b_i+1 are either both rises, both falls, the first a rise and the second a fall or the first a fall and the second a rise. These possibilities are denoted by RR, FF, RF, FR. The paper is concerned with the enumeration of pairs π, p with a given number of RR, FF, RF, FR. In particular if ω_n denotes the number of pairs with RR forbidden, it is proved that $\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}\text{=}\text{1}\text{?(z)}$, $\text{?(z) = ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{(-1)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$. More precisely if ω(n, k) denotes the number of pairs π, p with exactly k occurences of RR(or FF, RF, FR) then $\text{1 + ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$$\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{n?1}}{}_{\mathrm{k=0}}\text{ω(n, k)x}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(1 ? x)}\text{(?(z(1 ? x)) ? x)}$.     

Arithmetic in generalized Artin-Schreier extensions of k(x)

If k is a perfect field of characteristic p ≠ 0 and k(x) is the rational function field over k, it is possible to construct cyclic extensions K_n over k(x) such that [K : k(x)] = pⁿ using the concept of Witt vectors. This is accomplished in the following way; if [β₁, β₂,…, β_n] is a Witt vector over k(x) = K₀, then the Witt equation $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{?}\text{y}\text{= β}$ generates a tower of extensions through $\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= K}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ where $\text{y}\text{= [}\text{y}{}_1\text{,}\text{y}{}_2\text{,…,}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{]}$. In this paper, it is shown that there exists an alternate method of generating this tower which lends itself better for further constructions in K_n. This alternate generation has the form K_i = K_i?1(y_i); y_i^p ? y_i = B_i, where, as a divisor in K_i?1, B_i has the form . In this form q is prime to Πp_j^λ_j and each λ_j is positive and prime to p. As an application of this, the alternate generation is used to construct a lower-triangular form of the Hasse-Witt matrix of such a field K_n over an algebraically closed field of constants.     

Diophantine inequalities with mixed powers

It is shown that λ₁, λ₂,…, λ₆, μ are not all of the same sign and at least one ratio $\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$ is irrational then the values taken by $\text{λ}{}_1\text{x}{}_1{}^3\text{+ ? + λ}{}_6\text{x}{}_6{}^3\text{+ μy}{}^3$ for integer values of x₁ ,…, x₆, y are everywhere dense on the real line. A similar result holds for expressions of the form $\text{λ}{}_1\text{x}{}_1{}^3\text{+ ? + λ}{}_4\text{x}{}_4{}^3\text{+ μ}{}_1\text{y}{}_1{}^2\text{+ μ}{}_2\text{y}{}_2{}^3$.     

Commuting self-adjoint partial differential operators and a group theoretic problem

In Rⁿ let Ω denote a Nikodym region (= a connected open set on which every distribution of finite Dirichlet integral is itself in $\text{L}{}^2\text{(Ω))}$. The existence of n commuting self-adjoint operators $\text{H}{}_1\text{,…, H}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{in}\text{L}{}^2\text{(Ω)}$ such that each H_j is a restriction of $\text{?i β}\text{βx}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$ (acting in the distribution sense) is shown to be equivalent to the existence of a set Λ ?Rⁿ such that the restrictions to Ω of the functions exp i ∑ λ_jx_j form a total orthogonal family in $\text{L}{}^2\text{(Ω)}$. If it is required, in addition, that the unitary groups generated by H₁,…, H_n act multiplicatively on $\text{L}{}^2\text{(Ω)}$, then this is shown to correspond to the requirement that Λ can be chosen as a subgroup of the additive group Rⁿ. The measurable sets Ω ?Rⁿ (of finite Lebesgue measure) for which there exists a subgroup Λ ?Rⁿ as stated are precisely those measurable sets which (after a correction by a null set) form a system of representatives for the quotient of Rⁿ by some subgroup Γ (essentially the dual of Λ).     

Factored forms for solutions of AX − XB = C and X − AXB = C in companion matrices

The main concern of this paper is linear matrix equations with block-companion matrix coefficients. It is shown that general matrix equations AX ? XB = C and X ? AXB = C can be transformed to equations whose coefficients are block companion matrices: $\text{C}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{L}}\text{X?XC}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{=}\text{diag}\text{[I 0…0]}$ and $\text{X?}\text{C}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{L}}\text{XC}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{=}\text{diag}\text{[I 0…0]}$, respectively, where ?_L and C_M stand for the first and second block-companion matrices of some monic r × r matrix polynomials L(λ) = λ^sI + Σ^s?1_j=0λ^jL_j and M(λ) = λ^tI + Σ^t7minus;1_j=0λ^jM_j. The solution of the equat with block companion coefficients is reduced to solving vector equations Sx = ?, where the matrix S is r²l × r²l[l = max(s, t)] and enjoys some symmetry properties.     

Eigenvalues of p-summing and lp-type operators in Banach spaces

This paper is a study of the distribution of eigenvalues of various classes of operators. In Section 1 we prove that the eigenvalues (λ_n(T)) of a p-absolutely summing operator, p ? 2, satisfy

$\text{∑}\text{n∈N}\text{|λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(T)|}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{?π}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(T).}$

This solves a problem of A. Pietsch. We give applications of this to integral operators in L_p-spaces, weakly singular operators, and matrix inequalities.In Section 2 we introduce the quasinormed ideal Π₂⁽ⁿ⁾, P = (p₁, …, p_n) and show that for T ∈ Π₂⁽ⁿ⁾, 2 = (2, …, 2) ∈ Nⁿ, the eigenvalues of T satisfy

$\text{∑}\text{i∈N}\text{|λ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(T)|}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>2</mtext><mtext>n</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>n</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{?π}{}^{\mathrm{n}}{}_2\text{(T).}$

More generally, we show that for T ∈ Π_p⁽ⁿ⁾, P = (p₁, …, p_n), pi ? 2, the eigenvalues are absolutely p-summable,

$\text{1}\text{p}\text{=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{1}\text{p}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{and}\text{∑}\text{n∈N}\text{|λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(T)|}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{?C}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{π}{}^{\mathrm{n}}{}_{\mathrm{P}}\text{(T).}$

We also consider the distribution of eigenvalues of p-nuclear operators on L_r-spaces.In Section 3 we prove the Banach space analog of the classical Weyl inequality, namely

$\text{∑}\text{n∈N}\text{|λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(T)|}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{? C}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{∑}\text{n∈N}\text{α}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(T)}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$

, 0 < p < ∞, where α_n denotes the Kolmogoroff, Gelfand of approximation numbers of the operator T. This solves a problem of Markus-Macaev.Finally we prove that Hilbert space is (isomorphically) the only Banach space X with the property that nuclear operators on X have absolutely summable eigenvalues. Using this result we show that if the nuclear operators on X are of type l₁ then X must be a Hilbert space.     

Unitary interpolants,factorization indices and infinite Hankel block matrices

The existence, uniqueness, and construction of unitary n × n matrix valued functions $\text{?(ζ) = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; ?\infty }}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{ζ}{}^{\mathrm{j}}$ in Wiener-like algebras on the circle with prescribed matrix Fourier coefficients $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= γ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$ for j ? 0 are studied. In particular, if $\text{Σ ¦γ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{¦ < ∞}$, then such an ? exists with $\text{Σ ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{¦ < ∞}$ if and only if ∥Γ₀∥ ? 1, where Γ_v, denotes the infinite block Hankel matrix (γ_{j + k + v}), j, k = 0, 1,…, acting in the sequence space l_n². One of the main results is that the nonnegative factorization indices of every such ? are uniquely determined by the given data in terms of the dimensions of the kernels of $\text{I ? Γ}{}_{\mathrm{v}}{}^1\text{Γ}{}_{\mathrm{v}}$, whereas the negative factorization indices are arbitrary. It is also shown that there is a unique such ? if and only if the data forces all the factorization indices to be nonnegative and simple conditions for that and a formula for ? in terms of certain Schmidt pairs of Γ₀ are given. The results depend upon a fine analysis of the structure of the kernels of $\text{I ? Γ}{}_{\mathrm{v}}{}^1\text{Γ}{}_{\mathrm{v}}$ and of the one step extension problem of Adamjan, Arov, and Krein (Funct. Anal. Appl.2 (1968), 1–18). Isometric interpolants for the nonsquare case are also considered.     

Asymptotic behavior for an almost periodic,strongly dissipative wave equation

This paper deals with asymptotic behavior for (weak) solutions of the equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{tt}}\text{? Δu + β(u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{) ? ?(t, x)}$, on $\text{R}$⁺ × Ω; u(t, x) = 0, on $\text{R}$⁺ × ?Ω. If $\text{?∈L∞(R}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{,L}{}^2\text{(Ω))}$ and β is coercive, we prove that the solutions are bounded in the energy space, under weaker assumptions than those used by G. Prouse in a previous work. If in addition $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{∈S}{}^2\text{(R}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{,L}{}^2\text{(Ω))}$ and ? is srongly almost-periodic, we prove for strongly monotone β that all solutions are asymptotically almost-periodic in the energy space. The assumptions made on β are much less restrictive than those made by G. Prouse: mainly, we allow β to be multivalued, and in the one-dimensional case β need not be defined everywhere.     

Two-parameter Turan inequalities for ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials

It is known that the classical orthogonal polynomials satisfy inequalities of the form U_n²(x) ? U_{n + 1}(x) U_{n ? 1}(x) > 0 when x lies in the spectral interval. These are called Turan inequalities. In this paper we will prove a generalized Turan inequality for ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials. Specifically if P_n^λ(x) and L_n^α(x) are the ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials and $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(x) =}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(x)}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(1)}\text{, G}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) =}\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x)}\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(0)}\text{,}\text{then}\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) ? F}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) > 0, ? 1 < x < 1, ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< α ? β ? α + 1}\text{and}\text{G}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) G}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) ? G}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) G}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) > 0, x > 0, 0 < α ? β ? α + 1}$. We also prove the inequality $\text{(n + 1) F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) ? nF}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) > A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{[F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x)]}{}^2\text{, ?1 < x < 1, ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< α ? β < α + 1,}\text{where}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ is a positive constant depending on α and β.     

Construction of a recurrence relation for modified moments

In this paper we are constructing a recurrence relation of the form

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{r}\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(k)m}{}_{\mathrm{k+i}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f] = ω(k)}$

for integrals (called modified moments)

$\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f]df=}\text{∫}\text{?1}\text{1}\text{f(x)C}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(\lambda )}}\text{(x)dx (k = 0,1,…)}$

in which C_k^(λ) is the k-th Gegenbauer polynomial of order $\text{λ(λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}$, and f is a function satisfying the differential equation

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)f}{}^{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{(x) = p(x) (?1?x?1)}$

of order n, where p₀, p₁, …, p_n ? 0 are polynomials, and m_k^〈λ〉[p] is known for every k. We give three methods of construction of such a recurrence relation. The first of them (called Method I) is optimum in a certain sense.     

A queueing model and a set of orthogonal polynomials

A single serving queueing model is studied where potential customers are discouraged at the rate λ_n = λqⁿ, 0 < q < 1, n is the queue length. The serving rate is μ_n = μ(1 ? qⁿ), n = 0, 1,…. The spectral function is computed and the corresponding set of orthogonal polynomials is studied in detail. The slightly more general model with $\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{λq}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(1 + bq}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{, μ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{μ(1 ? q}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{(1 + bq}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ and the analogous orthogonal polynomials are also investigated. In both cases a method developed by Pollaczek is used which has been used very successfully to study new sets of orthogonal polynomials by Askey and Ismail.     

On the absolute continuity of Schrödinger operators with spherically symmetric,long-range potentials,II

Let H = ?Δ + V, where the potential V is spherically symmetric and can be decomposed as a sum of a short-range and a long-range term, V(r) = V_S(r) + V_L. Let λ = lim sup_r→∞V_L(r) < ∞ (we allow λ = ? ∞) and set λ⁺ = max(λ, 0). Assume that for some r₀, V_L(r) ?C^2k(r₀, ∞) and that there exists δ > 0 such that $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dr}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r) · (λ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{? V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r) + 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= O(r}{}^{\mathrm{?j\delta }}\text{), j = 1,…, 2k,}\text{as}\text{r → ∞}$. Assume further that $\text{∝}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(}\text{dr}\text{¦ V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r)¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{) = ∞}$ and that 2kδ > 1. It is shown that: (a) The restriction of H to C^∞(Rⁿ) is essentially self-adjoint, (b) The essential spectrum of H contains the closure of (λ, ∞). (c) The part of H over (λ, ∞) is absolutely continuous.     

Generalizations of two inequalities involving hermitian forms

Let λ₁ and λ_N be, respectively, the greatest and smallest eigenvalues of an N×N hermitian matrix H=(h_ij), and x=(x₁,x₂,…,x_N) with (x,x)=1. Then, it is known that (1) λ₁?(x,Hx)?λ_N and (2) if, in addition, H is positive definite, $\text{(λ}{}_1\text{+λ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{)}{}^2\text{4λ}{}_1\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{?(x,Hx)(x,H}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{x)?1}$. Assuming that y=(y₁,y₂,…, y_N) and |y_i|?1, i=1,2,…,N, it is shown in this paper that these inequalities remain true if H and H^?1 are, respectively, replaced by the Hadamard products $\text{M(y)1H}$ and $\text{M(y)1H}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$, where M(y) is a matrix defined by $\text{M(y)=(δ}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{+(1?δ}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{)}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$. Subsequently, these results are extended to improve the spectral bounds of $\text{M(y)1H}$.     

The Dirichlet problem for the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group,II

Let L = ∑_{j = 1}^mX_j² be sum of squares of vector fields in $\text{R}$ⁿ satisfying a Hörmander condition of order 2: span{X_j, [X_i, X_j]} is the full tangent space at each point. A point x??D of a smooth domain D is characteristic if X₁,…, X_m are all tangent to ?D at x. We prove sharp estimates in non-isotropic Lipschitz classes for the Dirichlet problem near (generic) isolated characteristic points in two special cases: (a) The Grushin operator $\text{?}{}^2\text{?x}{}^2\text{+ x}{}^2\text{?}{}^2\text{?t}{}^2$ in $\text{R}$². (b) The real part of the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group $\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(}\text{?}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ 2y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{)}{}^2\text{+ (}\text{?}\text{?y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? 2x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{)}{}^2$ in $\text{R}$^{2n + 1}. In contrast to non-characteristic points, C^∞ regularity may fail at a characteristic point. The precise order of regularity depends on the shape of ?D at x.     

Generating functions for certain types of permutations

Generating functions are obtained for certain types of permutations analogous to up-down and down-up permutations. In each case the generating function is a quotient of entire functions; the denominator in each case is φ₀²(x) ? φ₁(x)φ₃(x), where

$\text{φ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(x)=}\text{∑}\text{n=o}\text{∞}\text{x}{}^{\mathrm{4n+j}}\text{(4n+j)}\text{!.}$

     

On the probability that k positive integers are relatively prime II

Given a set S of positive integers let $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t)}$ denote the number of k-tuples 〈m₁, …, m_k〉 for which $\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{∈ S ? [1, t]}$ and (m₁, …, m_k) = 1. Also let $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n)}$ denote the probability that k integers, chosen at random from $\text{S ? [1, n]}$, are relatively prime. It is shown that if P = {p₁, …, p_r} is a finite set of primes and S = {m : (m, p₁ … p_r) = 1}, then $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{\nu ?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + O(t}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{)}$ if k ≥ 3 and $\text{Z}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^2\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^2\text{) + O(t}\text{log}\text{t)}$ where d(S) denotes the natural density of S. From this result it follows immediately that $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = (ζ(k))}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p\in P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ as n → ∞. This result generalizes an earlier result of the author's where $\text{P = ?}$ and S is then the whole set of positive integers. It is also shown that if S = {p₁^x₁ … p_r^x_r : x_i = 0, 1, 2,…}, then $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → 0}$ as n → ∞.     

Some divided difference inequalities for n-convex functions

Using results from the theory of B-splines, various inequalities involving the nth order divided differences of a function f with convex nth derivative are proved; notably, $\text{f}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(z)}\text{n! ? [x}{}_0\text{,…, x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{]f}\text{?}\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 0}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(f}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}\text{(n + 1)!)}$, where z is the center of mass $\text{(}\text{1}\text{(n + 1))}\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 0}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}$.     

Global Carleman estimates for weak solutions of elliptic nonhomogeneous Dirichlet problemsEstimations de Carleman globales pour des solutions faibles de problèmes elliptiques avec condition de Dirichlet non homogène

We consider a general second order elliptic equation with right-hand side $\text{f+∑}{}_{\mathrm{j=0}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{?f}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{∈}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{(Ω)}$ where $\text{f,f}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{∈}\text{L}{}^2\text{(Ω)}$ and Dirichlet boundary condition g∈H^1/2(Γ). We prove a global Carleman estimate for the solution y of this equation in terms of the weighted L² norms of f and f_j and the H^1/2 norm of g. This estimate depends on two real parameters s and λ which are supposed to be large enough and is sharp with respect to the exponents of these parameters. This allows us to obtain, for example, sharper estimates on the pressure term in the linearized Navier–Stokes equations and it turns out to be very useful in the context of controllability problems. To cite this article: O.Y. Imanuvilov, J.-P. Puel, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 335 (2002) 33–38.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators with unitary part

Let m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral $\text{H}$ = ⊕L²(v^t) dm(t) and the operator $\text{(L?)(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{?(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ on $\text{H}$, where e(s, t) = exp ∫_s^t ∫_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ). Let μ_t be the measure defined by $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dμ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{dm(s)}$ for all continuous ?, and let ?_t(z) = exp[?∫ (e^iθ + z)(e^iθ ? z)^?1dμ_t(gq)]. Call {v_t} regular iff for all $\text{t, ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦ = ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦}$ for 1 a.e.