The Hecke group algebra of a Coxeter group and its representation theory

Let W be a finite Coxeter group. We define its Hecke-group algebra by gluing together appropriately its group algebra and its 0-Hecke algebra. We describe in detail this algebra (dimension, several bases, conjectural presentation, combinatorial construction of simple and indecomposable projective modules, Cartan map) and give several alternative equivalent definitions (as symmetry preserving operator algebra, as poset algebra, as commutant algebra, …).In type A, the Hecke-group algebra can be described as the algebra generated simultaneously by the elementary transpositions and the elementary sorting operators acting on permutations. It turns out to be closely related to the monoid algebras of respectively nondecreasing functions and nondecreasing parking functions, the representation theory of which we describe as well.This defines three towers of algebras, and we give explicitly the Grothendieck algebras and coalgebras given respectively by their induction products and their restriction coproducts. This yields some new interpretations of the classical bases of quasi-symmetric and noncommutative symmetric functions as well as some new bases.     

The sorting order on a Coxeter group

Let (W,S) be an arbitrary Coxeter system. For each word ω in the generators we define a partial order—called the ω-sorting order—on the set of group elements Wω⊆W that occur as subwords of ω. We show that the ω-sorting order is a supersolvable join-distributive lattice and that it is strictly between the weak and Bruhat orders on the group. Moreover, the ω-sorting order is a “maximal lattice” in the sense that the addition of any collection of Bruhat covers results in a nonlattice.Along the way we define a class of structures called supersolvable antimatroids and we show that these are equivalent to the class of supersolvable join-distributive lattices.     

Shadows in Coxeter Groups

Annals of Combinatorics - For a given w in a Coxeter group W, the elements u smaller than w in Bruhat order can be seen as the end alcoves of stammering galleries of type w in the Coxeter complex...     

Homotopy type of the boolean complex of a Coxeter system

In any Coxeter group, the set of elements whose principal order ideals are boolean forms a simplicial poset under the Bruhat order. This simplicial poset defines a cell complex, called the boolean complex. In this paper it is shown that, for any Coxeter system of rank n, the boolean complex is homotopy equivalent to a wedge of (n−1)-dimensional spheres. The number of such spheres can be computed recursively from the unlabeled Coxeter graph, and defines a new graph invariant called the boolean number. Specific calculations of the boolean number are given for all finite and affine irreducible Coxeter systems, as well as for systems with graphs that are disconnected, complete, or stars. One implication of these results is that the boolean complex is contractible if and only if a generator of the Coxeter system is in the center of the group.     

Deformations of permutation representations of Coxeter groups

The permutation representation afforded by a Coxeter group W acting on the cosets of a standard parabolic subgroup inherits many nice properties from W such as a shellable Bruhat order and a flat deformation over ?[q] to a representation of the corresponding Hecke algebra. In this paper we define a larger class of “quasiparabolic” subgroups (more generally, quasiparabolic W-sets), and show that they also inherit these properties. Our motivating example is the action of the symmetric group on fixed-point-free involutions by conjugation.     

On the Fully Commutative Elements of Coxeter Groups

Let W be a Coxeter group. We define an element w ε W to be fully commutative if any reduced expression for w can be obtained from any other by means of braid relations that only involve commuting generators. We give several combinatorial characterizations of this property, classify the Coxeter groups with finitely many fully commutative elements, and classify the parabolic quotients whose members are all fully commutative. As applications of the latter, we classify all parabolic quotients with the property that (1) the Bruhat ordering is a lattice, (2) the Bruhat ordering is a distributive lattice, (3) the weak ordering is a distributive lattice, and (4) the weak ordering and Bruhat ordering coincide. Partially supported by NSF Grants DMS-9057192 and DMS-9401575.     

Brauer and Jones tied monoids

We introduce a ramified monoid, attached to each Brauer–type monoid, that is, to the symmetric group, to the Jones and Brauer monoids among others. Ramified monoids correspond to a class of tied monoids arising from knot theory and are interesting in themselves. The ramified monoid attached to the symmetric group is the Coxeter-like version of the so–called tied braid monoid. We give a presentation of the ramified monoid attached to the Brauer monoid. Also, we introduce and study two tied-like monoids that cannot be described as ramified monoids. However, these monoids can also be regarded as tied versions of the Jones and Brauer monoids.     

Double Catalan monoids

In this paper, we define and study what we call the double Catalan monoid. This monoid is the image of a natural map from the 0-Hecke monoid to the monoid of binary relations. We show that the double Catalan monoid provides an algebraization of the (combinatorial) set of 4321-avoiding permutations and relate its combinatorics to various off-shoots of both the combinatorics of Catalan numbers and the combinatorics of permutations. In particular, we give an algebraic interpretation of the first derivative of the Kreweras involution on Dyck paths, of 4321-avoiding involutions and of recent results of Barnabei et al. on admissible pairs of Dyck paths. We compute a presentation and determine the minimal dimension of an effective representation for the double Catalan monoid. We also determine the minimal dimension of an effective representation for the 0-Hecke monoid.     

Special matchings in Coxeter groups

Special matchings are purely combinatorial objects associated with a partially ordered set, which have applications in Coxeter group theory. We provide an explicit characterization and a complete classification of all special matchings of any lower Bruhat interval. The results hold in any arbitrary Coxeter group and have also applications in the study of the corresponding parabolic Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials.     

Fundamental groups,inverse schützenberger automata,and monoid presentations

This paper gives decidable conditions for when a finitely generated subgroup of a free group is the fundamental group of a Schützenberger automaton corresponding to a monoid presentation of an inverse monoid. Also, generalizations are given to specific types of inverse monoids as well as to monoids which are "nearly inverse." This result has applications to computing membership for inverse monoids in a Mal'cev product of the pseudovariety of semilattices with a pseudovariety of groups.

This paper also shows that there is a bijection between strongly connected inverse automata and subgroups of a free group, generated by positive words. Hence, we also obtain that it is decidable whether a finite strongly connected inverse automaton is a Schützenberger automaton corresponding to a monoid presentation of an inverse monoid. Again, we have generalizations to other types of inverse monoids and to "nearly inverse" monoids. We show that it is undecidable whether a finite strongly connected inverse automaton is a Schützenberger automaton of a monoid presentation of anE-unitary inverse monoid.     

A Tableau Approach to the Representation Theory of 0-Hecke Algebras

A 0-Hecke algebra is a deformation of the group algebra of a Coxeter group. Based on work of Norton and Krob-Thibon, we introduce a tableau approach to the representation theory of 0-Hecke algebras of type A, which resembles the classic approach to the representation theory of symmetric groups by Young tableaux and tabloids. We extend this approach to types B and D, and obtain a correspondence between the representation theory of 0-Hecke algebras of types B and D and quasisymmetric functions and noncommutative symmetric functions of types B and D. Other applications are also provided.     

Fixed points of involutive automorphisms of the Bruhat order

Applying a classical theorem of Smith, we show that the poset property of being Gorenstein^* over Z₂ is inherited by the subposet of fixed points under an involutive poset automorphism. As an application, we prove that every interval in the Bruhat order on (twisted) involutions in an arbitrary Coxeter group has this property, and we find the rank function. This implies results conjectured by F. Incitti. We also show that the Bruhat order on the fixed points of an involutive automorphism induced by a Coxeter graph automorphism is isomorphic to the Bruhat order on the fixed subgroup viewed as a Coxeter group in its own right.     

A Characterization of the Simply-Laced FC-Finite Coxeter Groups

We call an element of a Coxeter group fully covering (or a fully covering element) if its length is equal to the number of the elements it covers in the Bruhat ordering. It is easy to see that the notion of fully covering is a generalization of the notion of a 321-avoiding permutation and that a fully covering element is a fully commutative element. Also, we call a Coxeter group bi-full if its fully commutative elements coincide with its fully covering elements. We show that the bi-full Coxeter groups are the ones of type A_n, D_n, E_n with no restriction on n. In other words, Coxeter groups of type E₉, E₁₀,.... are also bi-full. According to a result of Fan, a Coxeter group is a simply-laced FC-finite Coxeter group if and only if it is a bi-full Coxeter group.AMS Subject Classification: 06A07, 20F55.     

The Greedy Algorithm and Coxeter Matroids

The notion of matroid has been generalized to Coxeter matroid by Gelfand and Serganova. To each pair (W, P) consisting of a finite irreducible Coxeter group W and parabolic subgroup P is associated a collection of objects called Coxeter matroids. The (ordinary) matroids are a special case, the case W = A (isomorphic to the symmetric group Sym_{_n+1}) and P a maximal parabolic subgroup. The main result of this paper is that for Coxeter matroids, just as for ordinary matroids, the greedy algorithm provides a solution to a naturally associated combinatorial optimization problem. Indeed, in many important cases, Coxeter matroids are characterized by this property. This result generalizes the classical Rado-Edmonds and Gale theorems.A corollary of our theorem is that, for Coxeter matroids L, the greedy algorithm solves the L-assignment problem. Let W be a finite group acting as linear transformations on a Euclidean space , and let

The Natural Embedding of Positive Singular Artin Monoids

We explore some combinatorial properties of singular Artin monoids and invoke them to prove that a positive singular Artin monoid of arbitrary Coxeter type necessarily injects into the corresponding singular Artin monoid. This is an extension of L. Pari' result that positive Artin monoids embed in the correpsonding Artin groups: Adjoining inverses of the generators does not produce any new identities between words that do not involve those inverses.     

Admissible submonoids of Artin-Tits monoids

We show the analogue of Mühlherr’s [B. Mühlherr, Coxeter groups in Coxeter groups, in: Finite Geometry and Combinatorics, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 277-287] for Artin-Tits monoids and for Artin-Tits groups of spherical type. That is, the submonoid (resp. subgroup) of an Artin-Tits monoid (resp. group of spherical type) induced by an admissible partition of the Coxeter graph is an Artin-Tits monoid (resp. group).This generalizes and unifies the situation of the submonoid (resp. subgroup) of fixed elements of an Artin-Tits monoid (resp. group of spherical type) under the action of graph automorphisms, and the notion of LCM-homomorphisms defined by Crisp in [J. Crisp, Injective maps between Artin groups, in: Geom. Group Theory Down Under (Canberra 1996), de Gruyter, Berlin, 1999, pp. 119-137] and generalized by Godelle in [E. Godelle, Morphismes injectifs entre groupes d’Artin-Tits, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 2 (2002) 519-536].We then complete the classification of the admissible partitions for which the Coxeter graphs involved have no infinite label, started by Mühlherr in [B. Mühlherr, Some contributions to the theory of buildings based on the gate property, Dissertation, Tübingen, 1994]. This leads us to the classification of Crisp’s LCM-homomorphisms.     

Tied monoids

We construct certain monoids, called tied monoids. These monoids result to be semidirect products finitely presented and commonly built from braid groups and their relatives acting on monoids of set partitions. The nature of our monoids indicate that they should give origin to new knot algebras; indeed, our tied monoids include the tied braid monoid and the tied singular braid monoid, which were used, respectively, to construct new polynomial invariants for classical links and singular links. Consequently, we provide a mechanism to attach an algebra to each tied monoid; this mechanism not only captures known generalizations of the bt-algebra, but also produces possible new knot algebras. To build the tied monoids it is necessary to have presentations of set partition monoids of types A, B and D, among others. For type A we use a presentation due to FitzGerald and for the other type it was necessary to built them.

     

The Enumeration of Coxeter Elements

Let (W,S, ) be a Coxeter system: a Coxeter group W with S its distinguished generator set and its Coxeter graph. In the present paper, we always assume that the cardinality l=|S| ofS is finite. A Coxeter element of W is by definition a product of all generators s S in any fixed order. We use the notation C(W) to denote the set of all the Coxeter elements in W. These elements play an important role in the theory of Coxeter groups, e.g., the determination of polynomial invariants, the Poincaré polynomial, the Coxeter number and the group order of W (see [1–5] for example). They are also important in representation theory (see [6]). In the present paper, we show that the set C(W) is in one-to-one correspondence with the setC() of all acyclic orientations of . Then we use some graph-theoretic tricks to compute the cardinality c(W) of the setC(W) for any Coxeter group W. We deduce a recurrence formula for this number. Furthermore, we obtain some direct formulae of c(W) for a large family of Coxeter groups, which include all the finite, affine and hyperbolic Coxeter groups.The content of the paper is organized as below. In Section 1, we discuss some properties of Coxeter elements for simplifying the computation of the value c(W). In particular, we establish a bijection between the sets C(W) andC() . Then among the other results, we give a recurrence formula of c(W) in Section 2. Subsequently we deduce some closed formulae of c(W) for certain families of Coxeter groups in Section 3.     

Comparing Semigroup and Monoid Presentations for Finite Monoids

 It is known that for any finite group G given by a finite group presentation there exists a finite semigroup presentation for G of the same deficiency, i.e. satisfying . It is also known that the analogous statement does not hold for all finite monoids. In this paper we give a necessary and sufficient condition for a finite monoid M, given by a finite monoid presentation, to have a finite semigroup presentation of the same deficiency.