Solving multiobjective,multiconstraint knapsack problems using mathematical programming and evolutionary algorithms

In this paper, we solve instances of the multiobjective multiconstraint (or multidimensional) knapsack problem (MOMCKP) from the literature, with three objective functions and three constraints. We use exact as well as approximate algorithms. The exact algorithm is a properly modified version of the multicriteria branch and bound (MCBB) algorithm, which is further customized by suitable heuristics. Three branching heuristics and a more general purpose composite branching and construction heuristic are devised. Comparison is made to the published results from another exact algorithm, the adaptive ε-constraint method [Laumanns, M., Thiele, L., Zitzler, E., 2006. An efficient, adaptive parameter variation scheme for Metaheuristics based on the epsilon-constraint method. European Journal of Operational Research 169, 932–942], using the same data sets. Furthermore, the same problems are solved using standard multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA), namely, the SPEA2 and the NSGAII. The results from the exact case show that the branching heuristics greatly improve the performance of the MCBB algorithm, which becomes faster than the adaptive ε -constraint. Regarding the performance of the MOEA algorithms in the specific problems, SPEA2 outperforms NSGAII in the degree of approximation of the Pareto front, as measured by the coverage metric (especially for the largest instance).     

Evaluation of the multiobjective ant colony algorithm performances on biobjective quadratic assignment problems

The difficulty of resolving the multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems with traditional methods has directed researchers to investigate new approaches which perform better. In recent years some algorithms based on ant colony optimization (ACO) metaheuristic have been suggested to solve these multiobjective problems. In this study these algorithms have been reported and programmed both to solve the biobjective quadratic assignment problem (BiQAP) instances and to evaluate the performances of these algorithms. The robust parameter sets for each 12 multiobjective ant colony optimization (MOACO) algorithms have been calculated and BiQAP instances in the literature have been solved within these parameter sets. The performances of the algorithms have been evaluated by comparing the Pareto fronts obtained from these algorithms. In the evaluation step, a multi significance test is used in a non hierarchical structure, and a performance metric (P metric) essential for this test is introduced. Through this study, decision makers will be able to put in the biobjective algorithms in an order according to the priority values calculated from the algorithms’ Pareto fronts. Moreover, this is the first time that MOACO algorithms have been compared by solving BiQAPs.     

The influence of the fitness evaluation method on the performance of multiobjective search algorithms

In this paper we are concerned with finding the Pareto optimal front or a good approximation to it. Since non-dominated solutions represent the goal in multiobjective optimisation, the dominance relation is frequently used to establish preference between solutions during the search. Recently, relaxed forms of the dominance relation have been proposed in the literature for improving the performance of multiobjective search methods. This paper investigates the influence of different fitness evaluation methods on the performance of two multiobjective methodologies when applied to a highly constrained two-objective optimisation problem. The two algorithms are: the Pareto archive evolutionary strategy and a population-based annealing algorithm. We demonstrate here, on a highly constrained problem, that the method used to evaluate the fitness of candidate solutions during the search affects the performance of both algorithms and it appears that the dominance relation is not always the best method to use.     

Multiobjective shortest path problems with lexicographic goal-based preferences

Multiobjective shortest path problems are computationally harder than single objective ones. In particular, execution time is an important limiting factor in exact multiobjective search algorithms. This paper explores the possibility of improving search performance in those cases where the interesting portion of the Pareto front can be initially bounded. We introduce a new exact label-setting algorithm that returns the subset of Pareto optimal paths that satisfy a set of lexicographic goals, or the subset that minimizes deviation from goals if these cannot be fully satisfied. Formal proofs on the correctness of the algorithm are provided. We also show that the algorithm always explores a subset of the labels explored by a full Pareto search. The algorithm is evaluated over a set of problems with three objectives, showing a performance improvement of up to several orders of magnitude as goals become more restrictive.     

The Pareto fitness genetic algorithm: Test function study

Evolutionary algorithms have shown some success in solving multiobjective optimization problems. The methods of fitness assignment are mainly based on the information about the dominance relation between individuals. We propose a Pareto fitness genetic algorithm (PFGA) in which we introduce a modified ranking procedure and a promising way of sharing; a new fitness function based on the rank of the individual and its density value is designed. This is considered as our main contribution. The performance of our algorithm is evaluated on six multiobjective benchmarks with different Pareto front features. Computational results (quality of the approximation of the Pareto optimal set and the number of fitness function evaluations) proving its efficiency are reported.     

A novel elitist multiobjective optimization algorithm: Multiobjective extremal optimization

Recently, a general-purpose local-search heuristic method called extremal optimization (EO) has been successfully applied to some NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. This paper presents an investigation on EO with its application in numerical multiobjective optimization and proposes a new novel elitist (1 + λ) multiobjective algorithm, called multiobjective extremal optimization (MOEO). In order to extend EO to solve the multiobjective optimization problems, the Pareto dominance strategy is introduced to the fitness assignment of the proposed approach. We also present a new hybrid mutation operator that enhances the exploratory capabilities of our algorithm. The proposed approach is validated using five popular benchmark functions. The simulation results indicate that the proposed approach is highly competitive with the state-of-the-art multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Thus MOEO can be considered a good alternative to solve numerical multiobjective optimization problems.     

Generalized Homotopy Approach to Multiobjective Optimization

This paper proposes a new generalized homotopy algorithm for the solution of multiobjective optimization problems with equality constraints. We consider the set of Pareto candidates as a differentiable manifold and construct a local chart which is fitted to the local geometry of this Pareto manifold. New Pareto candidates are generated by evaluating the local chart numerically. The method is capable of solving multiobjective optimization problems with an arbitrary number k of objectives, makes it possible to generate all types of Pareto optimal solutions, and is able to produce a homogeneous discretization of the Pareto set. The paper gives a necessary and sufficient condition for the set of Pareto candidates to form a (k-1)-dimensional differentiable manifold, provides the numerical details of the proposed algorithm, and applies the method to two multiobjective sample problems.     

A hybrid immune multiobjective optimization algorithm

In this paper, we develop a hybrid immune multiobjective optimization algorithm (HIMO) based on clonal selection principle. In HIMO, a hybrid mutation operator is proposed with the combination of Gaussian and polynomial mutations (GP-HM operator). The GP-HM operator adopts an adaptive switching parameter to control the mutation process, which uses relative large steps in high probability for boundary individuals and less-crowded individuals. With the generation running, the probability to perform relative large steps is reduced gradually. By this means, the exploratory capabilities are enhanced by keeping a desirable balance between global search and local search, so as to accelerate the convergence speed to the true Pareto-optimal front in the global space with many local Pareto-optimal fronts. When comparing HIMO with various state-of-the-art multiobjective optimization algorithms developed recently, simulation results show that HIMO performs better evidently.     

Online surrogate multiobjective optimization algorithm for contaminated groundwater remediation designs

This paper proposes an online surrogate model-assisted multiobjective optimization framework to identify optimal remediation strategies for groundwater contaminated with dense non-aqueous phase liquids. The optimization involves three objectives: minimizing the remediation cost and duration and maximizing the contamination removal rate. The proposed framework adopts a multiobjective feasibility-enhanced particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve the optimization model and uses an online surrogate model as a substitute for the time-consuming multiphase flow model for calculating contamination removal rates during the optimization process. The resulting approach allows decision makers to find a balance among the remediation cost, remediation duration and contamination removal rate for remediating contaminated groundwater. The new algorithm is compared with the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II, which is an extensively applied and well-known algorithm. The results show that the Pareto solutions obtained by the new algorithm have greater diversity and stability than those obtained by the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II, indicating that the new algorithm is more applicable than the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II for optimizing remediation strategies for contaminated groundwater. Additionally, the surrogate model and Pareto optimal set obtained by the proposed framework are compared with those of the offline surrogate model-assisted multiobjective optimization framework. The results indicate that the surrogate model accuracy and Pareto front achieved by the proposed framework outperform those of the offline surrogate model-assisted optimization framework. Thus, we conclude that the proposed framework can effectively enhance the surrogate model accuracy and further extend the comprehensive performance of Pareto solutions.     

A Proximal Point-Type Method for Multicriteria Optimization

In this paper, we present a proximal point algorithm for multicriteria optimization, by assuming an iterative process which uses a variable scalarization function. With respect to the convergence analysis, firstly we show that, for any sequence generated from our algorithm, each accumulation point is a Pareto critical point for the multiobjective function. A more significant novelty here is that our paper gets full convergence for quasi-convex functions. In the convex or pseudo-convex cases, we prove convergence to a weak Pareto optimal point. Another contribution is to consider a variant of our algorithm, obtaining the iterative step through an unconstrained subproblem. Then, we show that any sequence generated by this new algorithm attains a Pareto optimal point after a finite number of iterations under the assumption that the weak Pareto optimal set is weak sharp for the multiobjective problem.