首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到10条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
The composition operators on weighted Bloch space   总被引:9,自引:0,他引:9  
We will characterize the boundedness and compactness of the composition operators on weighted Bloch space B log = { f ? H(D): supz ? D (1-| z|2) ( log\frac21-| z|2 )| f¢(z)| B_{ \log }= \{ f \in H(D): \sup_{z \in D } (1-\left| z\right|^2) \left( \log \frac{2}{1-\left| z\right|^2} \right)\left| f'(z)\right| < +¥} +\infty \} , where H(D) be the class of all analytic functions on D.  相似文献   

2.
We are interested in the isometric equivalence problem for the Cesàro operator C(f) (z) = \frac1z ò0zf(x) \frac11-xd x{C(f) (z) =\frac{1}{z} \int_{0}^{z}f(\xi) \frac{1}{1-\xi}d \xi} and an operator Tg(f)(z)=\frac1zò0zf(x) g(x) d x{T_{g}(f)(z)=\frac{1}{z}\int_{0}^{z}f(\xi) g^{\prime}(\xi) d \xi}, where g is an analytic function on the disc, on the Hardy and Bergman spaces. Then we generalize this to the isometric equivalence problem of two operators Tg1{T_{g_{1}}} and Tg2{T_{g_{2}}} on the Hardy space and Bergman space. We show that the operators Tg1{T_{g_{1}}} and Tg2{T_{g_{2}}} satisfy Tg1U1=U2Tg2{T_{g_{1}}U_{1}=U_{2}T_{g_{2}}} on H p , 1 ≤ p < ∞, p ≠ 2 if and only if g2(z) = lg1(eiqz){g_{2}(z) =\lambda g_{1}(e^{i\theta}z) }, where λ is a modulus one constant and U i , i = 1, 2 are surjective isometries of the Hardy Space. This is analogous to the Campbell-Wright result on isometrically equivalence of composition operators on the Hardy space.  相似文献   

3.
Let G be a finite domain in the complex plane with K-quasicon formal boundary, z 0 be an arbitrary fixed point in G and p>0. Let jp ( z ): = òx0 x [ f( z) ]2/8 dz\varphi _p \left( z \right): = \int_{x_0 }^x {\left[ {\phi \left( \zeta \right)} \right]^{2/8} } d\zeta , and let \iintc | jp ( z ) - Px1 (z) |p d0x \iint\limits_c {\left| {\varphi _p \left( z \right) - P_x^1 (z)} \right|^p d0_x } in the class \mathop ?n \mathop \prod \limits_n of all polynomials of degree [`(G)]\bar G in case of $p > 2 - \frac{{K^2 + 1}}{{2K^4 }}$p > 2 - \frac{{K^2 + 1}}{{2K^4 }} .  相似文献   

4.
Let Co(α) denote the class of concave univalent functions in the unit disk \mathbbD{\mathbb{D}}. Each function f ? Co(a){f\in Co(\alpha)} maps the unit disk \mathbbD{\mathbb{D}} onto the complement of an unbounded convex set. In this paper we find the exact disk of variability for the functional (1-|z|2)( f¢¢(z)/f(z)), f ? Co(a){(1-|z|^2)\left ( f^{\prime\prime}(z)/f^{\prime}(z)\right), f\in Co(\alpha)}. In particular, this gives sharp upper and lower estimates for the pre-Schwarzian norm of concave univalent functions. Next we obtain the set of variability of the functional (1-|z|2)(f¢¢(z)/f(z)), f ? Co(a){(1-|z|^2)\left(f^{\prime\prime}(z)/f^{\prime}(z)\right), f\in Co(\alpha)} whenever f′′(0) is fixed. We also give a characterization for concave functions in terms of Hadamard convolution. In addition to sharp coefficient inequalities, we prove that functions in Co(α) belong to the H p space for p < 1/α.  相似文献   

5.
Let \mathbb Dn:={z=(z1,?, zn) ? \mathbb Cn:|zj| < 1,   j=1,?, n}{\mathbb {D}^n:=\{z=(z_1,\ldots, z_n)\in \mathbb {C}^n:|z_j| < 1, \;j=1,\ldots, n\}}, and let [`(\mathbbD)]n{\overline{\mathbb{D}}^n} denote its closure in \mathbb Cn{\mathbb {C}^n}. Consider the ring
Cr([`(\mathbbD)]n;\mathbb C) = {f:[`(\mathbbD)]n? \mathbb C:f   is   continuous   and  f(z)=[`(f([`(z)]))]   (z ? [`(\mathbbD)]n)}C_{\rm r}(\overline{\mathbb{D}}^n;\mathbb {C}) =\left\{f: \overline{\mathbb{D}}^n\rightarrow \mathbb {C}:f \,\, {\rm is \,\, continuous \,\, and}\,\, f(z)=\overline{f(\overline{z})} \;(z\in \overline{\mathbb{D}}^n)\right\}  相似文献   

6.
We define a generalized Li coefficient for the L-functions attached to the Rankin–Selberg convolution of two cuspidal unitary automorphic representations π and π of GLm(\mathbbAF)GL_{m}(\mathbb{A}_{F}) and GLm(\mathbbAF)GL_{m^{\prime }}(\mathbb{A}_{F}) . Using the explicit formula, we obtain an arithmetic representation of the n th Li coefficient lp,p(n)\lambda _{\pi ,\pi ^{\prime }}(n) attached to L(s,pf×[(p)\tilde]f)L(s,\pi _{f}\times \widetilde{\pi}_{f}^{\prime }) . Then, we deduce a full asymptotic expansion of the archimedean contribution to lp,p(n)\lambda _{\pi ,\pi ^{\prime }}(n) and investigate the contribution of the finite (non-archimedean) term. Under the generalized Riemann hypothesis (GRH) on non-trivial zeros of L(s,pf×[(p)\tilde]f)L(s,\pi _{f}\times \widetilde{\pi}_{f}^{\prime }) , the nth Li coefficient lp,p(n)\lambda _{\pi ,\pi ^{\prime }}(n) is evaluated in a different way and it is shown that GRH implies the bound towards a generalized Ramanujan conjecture for the archimedean Langlands parameters μ π (v,j) of π. Namely, we prove that under GRH for L(s,pf×[(p)\tilde]f)L(s,\pi _{f}\times \widetilde{\pi}_{f}) one has |Remp(v,j)| £ \frac14|\mathop {\mathrm {Re}}\mu_{\pi}(v,j)|\leq \frac{1}{4} for all archimedean places v at which π is unramified and all j=1,…,m.  相似文献   

7.
Let W í \Bbb C\Omega \subseteq {\Bbb C} be a simply connected domain in \Bbb C{\Bbb C} , such that {¥} è[ \Bbb C \[`(W)]]\{\infty\} \cup [ {\Bbb C} \setminus \bar{\Omega}] is connected. If g is holomorphic in Ω and every derivative of g extends continuously on [`(W)]\bar{\Omega} , then we write gA (Ω). For gA (Ω) and z ? [`(W)]\zeta \in \bar{\Omega} we denote SN (g,z)(z) = ?Nl=0\fracg(l) (z)l ! (z-z)lS_N (g,\zeta )(z)= \sum^{N}_{l=0}\frac{g^{(l)} (\zeta )}{l !} (z-\zeta )^l . We prove the existence of a function fA(Ω), such that the following hold:
i)  There exists a strictly increasing sequence μn ∈ {0, 1, 2, …}, n = 1, 2, …, such that, for every pair of compact sets Γ, Δ ⊂ [`(W)]\bar{\Omega} and every l ∈ {0, 1, 2, …} we have supz ? G supw ? D \frac?l?wl Smnf,z) (w)-f(l)(w) ? 0,    as n ? + ¥    and\sup_{\zeta \in \Gamma} \sup_{w \in \Delta} \frac{\partial^l}{\partial w^l} S_{\mu_ n} (\,f,\zeta) (w)-f^{(l)}(w) \rightarrow 0, \hskip 7.8pt {\rm as}\,n \rightarrow + \infty \quad {\rm and}
ii)  For every compact set K ì \Bbb CK \subset {\Bbb C} with K?[`(W)] = ?K\cap \bar{\Omega} =\emptyset and Kc connected and every function h: K? \Bbb Ch: K\rightarrow {\Bbb C} continuous on K and holomorphic in K0, there exists a subsequence { m¢n }n=1\{ \mu^\prime _n \}^{\infty}_{n=1} of {mn }n=1\{\mu_n \}^{\infty}_{n=1} , such that, for every compact set L ì [`(W)]L \subset \bar{\Omega} we have supz ? L supz ? K Sm¢nf,z)(z)-h(z) ? 0,    as  n? + ¥.\sup_{\zeta \in L} \sup_{z\in K} S_{\mu^\prime _n} (\,f,\zeta )(z)-h(z) \rightarrow 0, \hskip 7.8pt {\rm as} \, n\rightarrow + \infty .
  相似文献   

8.
A Toeplitz operator TfT_\phi with symbol f\phi in L(\mathbbD)L^{\infty}({\mathbb{D}}) on the Bergman space A2(\mathbbD)A^{2}({\mathbb{D}}), where \mathbbD\mathbb{D} denotes the open unit disc, is radial if f(z) = f(|z|)\phi(z) = \phi(|z|) a.e. on \mathbbD\mathbb{D}. In this paper, we consider the numerical ranges of such operators. It is shown that all finite line segments, convex hulls of analytic images of \mathbbD\mathbb{D} and closed convex polygonal regions in the plane are the numerical ranges of radial Toeplitz operators. On the other hand, Toeplitz operators TfT_\phi with f\phi harmonic on \mathbbD\mathbb{D} and continuous on [`(\mathbbD)]{\overline{\mathbb{D}}} and radial Toeplitz operators are convexoid, but certain compact quasinilpotent Toeplitz operators are not.  相似文献   

9.
Summary. Local solutions of the functional equation¶¶zk f( z) = ?k=1nGk( z) f( skz ) +g( z) z{^\kappa} \phi \left( z\right) =\sum_{k=1}^nG_k\left( z\right) \phi \left( s_kz \right) +g\left( z\right) ¶with k > 0 \kappa > 0 and | sk| \gt 1 \left| s_k\right| \gt 1 are considered. We prove that the equation is solvable if and only if a certain system of k \kappa conditions on Gk (k = 1, 2, ... , n) and g is fulfilled.  相似文献   

10.
In this paper we classify the centers localized at the origin of coordinates, the cyclicity of their Hopf bifurcation and their isochronicity for the polynomial differential systems in \mathbbR2{\mathbb{R}^2} of degree d that in complex notation z = x + i y can be written as
[(z)\dot] = (l+i) z + (z[`(z)])\fracd-52 (A z4+j[`(z)]1-j + B z3[`(z)]2 + C z2-j[`(z)]3+j+D[`(z)]5), \dot z = (\lambda+i) z + (z \overline{z})^{\frac{d-5}{2}} \left(A z^{4+j} \overline{z}^{1-j} + B z^3 \overline{z}^2 + C z^{2-j} \overline{z}^{3+j}+D \overline{z}^5\right),  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号