Faithful Representations of Free Products

In 1940 Nisnevi published the following theorem [3]. Let (G) be a family of groups indexed by some set and (F) a family of fields of the same characteristic p0. Iffor each the group G has a faithful representation of degreen over F then the free product* G has a faithful representationof degree n+1 over some field of characteristic p. In [6] Wehrfritzextended this idea. If (G) GL(n, F) is a family of subgroupsfor which there exists ZGL(n, F) such that for all the intersectionGF.1_n=Z, then the free product of the groups *_ZG with Z amalgamatedvia the identity map is isomorphic to a linear group of degreen over some purely transcendental extension of F. Initially, the purpose of this paper was to generalize theseresults from the linear to the skew-linear case, that is, togroups isomorphic to subgroups of GL(n, D) where the D are divisionrings. In fact, many of the results can be generalized to ringswhich, although not necessarily commutative, contain no zero-divisors.We have the following.     

The Bestvina-Brady Construction Revisited: Geometric Computation of {sum}-Invariants for Right-Angled Artin Groups

The starting point of our investigation is the remarkable paper[2] in which Bestvina and Brady gave an example of an infinitelyrelated group of type FP₂. The result about right-angled Artingroups behind their example is best interpreted by means ofthe Bieri–Strebel–Neumann–Renz -invariants. For a group G the invariants ⁿ(G) and ⁿ(G, Z) are sets of non-trivialhomomorphisms :GR. They contain full information about finitenessproperties of subgroups of G with abelian factor groups. Themain result of [2] determines for the canonical homomorphism, taking each generator of the right-angled Artin group G to1, the maximal n with ⁿ(G), respectively ⁿ(G, Z). In [6] Meier, Meinert and VanWyk completed the picture by computingthe full -invariants of right-angled Artin groups using as wellthe result of Bestvina and Brady as algebraic techniques from-theory. Here we offer a new account of their result which istotally geometric. In fact, we return to the Bestvina–Bradyconstruction and simplify their argument considerably by bringinga more general notion of links into play. At the end of thefirst section we re-prove their main result. By re-computingthe full -invariants, we show in the second section that thesimplification even adds some power to the method. The criterionwe give provides new insight on the geometric nature of the‘n-domination’ condition employed in [6].     

Set Theory is Interpretable in the Automorphism Group of an Infinitely Generated Free Group

In [6] S. Shelah showed that in the endomorphism semi-groupof an infinitely generated algebra which is free in a varietyone can interpret some set theory. It follows from his resultsthat, for an algebra F which is free of infinite rank in avariety of algebras in a language L, if > |L|, then thefirst-order theory of the endomorphism semi-group of F, Th(End(F)),syntactically interprets Th(,L₂), the second-order theory ofthe cardinal . This means that for any second-order sentence of empty language there exists *, a first-order sentence ofsemi-group language, such that for any infinite cardinal >|L|, Th(,L₂)*Th(End(F)) In his paper Shelah notes that it is natural to study a similarproblem for automorphism groups instead of endomorphism semi-groups;a priori the expressive power of the first-order logic for automorphismgroups is less than the one for endomorphism semi-groups. Forinstance, according to Shelah's results on permutation groups[4, 5], one cannot interpret set theory by means of first-orderlogic in the permutation group of an infinite set, the automorphismgroup of an algebra in empty language. On the other hand, onecan do this in the endomorphism semi-group of such an algebra. In [7, 8] the author found a solution for the case of the varietyof vector spaces over a fixed field. If V is a vector spaceof an infinite dimension over a division ring D, then the theoryTh(, L₂) is interpretable in the first-order theory of GL(V),the automorphism group of V. When a field D is countable anddefinable up to isomorphism by a second-order sentence, thenthe theories Th(GL(V)) and Th(, L₂) are mutually syntacticallyinterpretable. In the general case, the formulation is a bitmore complicated. The main result of this paper states that a similar result holdsfor the variety of all groups.     

Real Interpolation and Two Variants of Gehring's Lemma

Let be a fixed open cube in Rⁿ. For r[1, ) and [0, ) we define where Q is a cube in Rⁿ (with sides parallel to the coordinateaxes) and _Q stands for the characteristic function of the cubeQ. A well-known result of Gehring [5] states that if (1.1) for some p(1, ) and c(0, ), then there exist q(p, ) and C=C(p,q, n, c)(0, ) such that for all cubes Q, where |Q| denotes the n-dimensional Lebesguemeasure of Q. In particular, a function fL¹() satisfying (1.1)belongs to L^q(). In [9] it was shown that Gehring's result is a particular caseof a more general principle from the real method of interpolation.Roughly speaking, this principle states that if a certain reversedinequality between K-functionals holds at one point of an interpolationscale, then it holds at other nearby points of this scale. Usingan extension of Holmstedt's reiteration formulae of [4] andresults of [8] on weighted inequalities for monotone functions,we prove here two variants of this principle involving extrapolationspaces of an ordered pair of (quasi-) Banach spaces. As an applicationwe prove the following Gehring-type lemmas.     

On Simultaneously Badly Approximable Numbers

For any pair i,j 0 with i+j=1 let Bad(i,j) denote the set ofpairs (,ß) R² for which max{||q||^1/i||qß|^1/j}>c/qfor all q N. Here c=c(,ß) is a positive constant.If i=0 the set Bad(0, 1) is identified with RxBad where Badis the set of badly approximable numbers. That is, Bad(0, 1)consists of pairs (, ß) with R and ß Bad If j=0 the roles of and ß are reversed. It isproved that the set Bad(1,0)Bad (0,1) Bad(i,j) has Hausdorffdimension 2, that is, full dimension. The method easily generalizesto give analogous statements in higher dimensions.     

Geometry of Critical Loci

Let :(Z,z)(U,0) be the germ of a finite (that is, proper with finite fibres)complex analytic morphism from a complex analytic normal surfaceonto an open neighbourhood U of the origin 0 in the complexplane C². Let u and v be coordinates of C² defined on U. Weshall call the triple (, u, v) the initial data. Let stand for the discriminant locus of the germ , that is,the image by of the critical locus of . Let ()_A be the branches of the discriminant locus at O whichare not the coordinate axes. For each A, we define a rational number d by where I(–, –) denotes the intersection number at0 of complex analytic curves in C². The set of rational numbersd, for A, is a finite subset D of the set of rational numbersQ. We shall call D the set of discriminantal ratios of the initialdata (, u, v). The interesting situation is when one of thetwo coordinates (u, v) is tangent to some branch of , otherwiseD = {1}. The definition of D depends not only on the choiceof the two coordinates, but also on their ordering. In this paper we prove that the set D is a topological invariantof the initial data (, u, v) (in a sense that we shall definebelow) and we give several ways to compute it. These resultsare first steps in the understanding of the geometry of thediscriminant locus. We shall also see the relation with thegeometry of the critical locus.     

Limits Along Parallel Lines and the Classical Fine Topology

The fine topology on Rⁿ (n2) is the coarsest topology for whichall superharmonic functions on Rⁿ are continuous. We refer toDoob [11, 1.XI] for its basic properties and its relationshipto the notion of thinness. This paper presents several theoremsrelating the fine topology to limits of functions along parallellines. (Results of this nature for the minimal fine topologyhave been given by Doob – see [10, Theorem 3.1] or [11,1.XII.23] – and the second author [15].) In particular,we will establish improvements and generalizations of resultsof Lusin and Privalov [18], Evans [12], Rudin [20], Bagemihland Seidel [6], Schneider [21], Berman [7], and Armitage andNelson [4], and will also solve a problem posed by the latterauthors. An early version of our first result is due to Evans [12, p.234], who proved that, if u is a superharmonic function on R³,then there is a set ER²x{0}, of two-dimensional measure 0, suchthat u(x, y,·) is continuous on R whenever (x, y, 0)E.We denote a typical point of Rⁿ by X=(X' x), where X'R^n–1and xR. Let :RⁿR^n–1x{0} denote the projection map givenby (X', x) = (X', 0). For any function f:Rⁿ[–, +] andpoint X we define the vertical and fine cluster sets of f atX respectively by C_V(f;X)={l[–, +]: there is a sequence (t_m) of numbersin R\{x} such that t_mx and f(X', t_m)l}| and C_F(f;X)={l[–, +]: for each neighbourhood N of l in [–,+], the set f^–1(N) is non-thin at X}. Sets which are open in the fine topology will be called finelyopen, and functions which are continuous with respect to thefine topology will be called finely continuous. Corollary 1(ii)below is an improvement of Evans' result.     

Support Varieties of Non-Restricted Modules over Lie Algebras of Reductive Groups

Let G be a connected semisimple group over an algebraicallyclosed field K of characteristic p>0, and g=Lie (G). Fixa linear function g* and let Z_g() denote the stabilizer of in g. Set N_p(g)={xg|x^[p]=0}. Let C(g) denote the category offinite-dimensional g-modules with p-character . In [7], Friedlanderand Parshall attached to each MOb(C(g)) a Zariski closed, conicalsubset V_g(M)N_p(g) called the support variety of M. Suppose thatG is simply connected and p is not special for G, that is, p2if G has a component of type B_n, C_n or F₄, and p3 if G has acomponent of type G₂. It is proved in this paper that, for anynonzero MOb(C(g)), the support variety V_g(M) is contained inN_p(g)Z_g(). This allows one to simplify the proof of the Kac–Weisfeilerconjecture given in [18].     

Barely Transitive and Heineken Mohamed Groups

A negative answer to the Kuro–ernikov Question 21 in [7],whether a group satisfying the normalizer condition is hypercentral,was given by Heineken and Mohamed in 1968 [6]. They constructedgroups G satisfying: (i) G is a locally finite p-group for a prime p, (ii) G/G'C_p and G' is countable elementary abelian, (iii) every proper subgroup of G is subnormal and nilpotent, (iv) Z(G)={1}, (v) the set of normal subgroups of G contained in G' is linearlyordered by set inclusion, see [3, p. 334], (vi) KG' is a proper subgroup in G for every proper subgroupK of G, see [6, Lemma 1(a)].     

Extremal Subgroups in Chevalley Groups

Throughout this paper G(k) denotes a Chevalley group of rankn defined over the field k, where n3. Let be the root systemassociated with G(k) and let ={₁, ₂, ..., _n} be a set of fundamentalroots of , with ⁺ being the set of positive roots of with respectto . For and ⁺, let n() be the coefficient of in the expressionof as a sum of fundamental roots; so =n(). Also we recall thatht(), the height of , is given by ht()=n(). The highest rootin ⁺ will be denoted by . We additionally assume that the Dynkindiagram of G(k) is connected.