Graphic sequences with a realization containing a complete multipartite subgraph

A nonincreasing sequence of nonnegative integers π=(d₁,d₂,…,d_n) is graphic if there is a (simple) graph G of order n having degree sequence π. In this case, G is said to realizeπ. For a given graph H, a graphic sequence π is potentiallyH-graphic if there is some realization of π containing H as a (weak) subgraph. Let σ(π) denote the sum of the terms of π. For a graph H and n∈Z⁺, σ(H,n) is defined as the smallest even integer m so that every n-term graphic sequence π with σ(π)≥m is potentially H-graphic. Let denote the complete t partite graph such that each partite set has exactly s vertices. We show that and obtain the exact value of σ(K_j+K_s,s,n) for n sufficiently large. Consequently, we obtain the exact value of for n sufficiently large.     

A multiply intersecting Erd?s-Ko-Rado theorem — The principal case

Let m(n,k,r,t) be the maximum size of satisfying |F₁∩?∩F_r|≥t for all F₁,…,F_r∈F. We prove that for every p∈(0,1) there is some r₀ such that, for all r>r₀ and all t with 1≤t≤⌊(p^1−r−p)/(1−p)⌋−r, there exists n₀ so that if n>n₀ and p=k/n, then . The upper bound for t is tight for fixed p and r.     

A degree sum condition for graphs to be prism hamiltonian

Win, in 1975, and Jackson and Wormald, in 1990, found the best sufficient conditions on the degree sum of a graph to guarantee the properties of “having a k-tree” and “having a k-walk”, respectively. The property of “being prism hamiltonian” is an intermediate property between “having a 2-tree” and “having a 2-walk”. Thus, it is natural to ask what is the best degree sum condition for graphs to be prism hamiltonian. As an answer to this problem, in this paper, we show that a connected graph G of order n with σ₃(G)≥n is prism hamiltonian. The degree sum condition “σ₃(G)≥n” is best possible.     

Edge-deletable IM-extendable graphs with minimum number of edges

A graph G is induced matching extendable, shortly IM-extendable, if every induced matching of G is included in a perfect matching of G. For a nonnegative integer k, a graph G is called a k-edge-deletable IM-extendable graph, if, for every F⊆E(G) with |F|=k, G−F is IM-extendable. In this paper, we characterize the k-edge-deletable IM-extendable graphs with minimum number of edges. We show that, for a positive integer k, if G is ak-edge-deletable IM-extendable graph on 2n vertices, then |E(G)|≥(k+2)n; furthermore, the equality holds if and only if either G≅K_k+2,k+2, or k=4r−2 for some integer r≥3 and G≅C₅[N_2r], where N_2r is the empty graph on 2r vertices and C₅[N_2r] is the graph obtained from C₅ by replacing each vertex with a graph isomorphic to N_2r.     

The Independence Number for De Bruijn networks and Kautz networks

Let D be a directed graph; the (l,ω)-Independence Number of graph D, denoted by α_l,ω(D), is an important performance parameter for interconnection networks. De Bruijn networks and Kautz networks, denoted by B(d,n) and K(d,n) respectively, are versatile and efficient topological structures of interconnection networks. For l=1,2,…,n, this paper shows that α_l,d−1(B(d,n))=dⁿ,α_l,d−1(K(d,n))=α_l,d(K(d,n))=dⁿ+dⁿ⁻¹ if d≥3 and n≤d−2. In particular, the paper shows the exact value of the Independence Number for B(d,1) and B(d,2) for any d. For the generalized situation, the paper obtains a lower bound α_l,d−1(B(d,n))≥d² if n≥3 and d≥5.     

Degree-bounded factorizations of bipartite multigraphs and of pseudographs

For d≥1, s≥0 a (d,d+s)-graph is a graph whose degrees all lie in the interval {d,d+1,…,d+s}. For r≥1, a≥0 an (r,r+a)-factor of a graph G is a spanning (r,r+a)-subgraph of G. An (r,r+a)-factorization of a graph G is a decomposition of G into edge-disjoint (r,r+a)-factors. A graph is (r,r+a)-factorable if it has an (r,r+a)-factorization.We prove a number of results about (r,r+a)-factorizations of (d,d+s)-bipartite multigraphs and of (d,d+s)-pseudographs (multigraphs with loops permitted). For example, for t≥1 let β(r,s,a,t) be the least integer such that, if d≥β(r,s,a,t) then every (d,d+s)-bipartite multigraph G is (r,r+a)-factorable with x(r,r+a)-factors for at least t different values of x. Then we show that

     

On (s,t)-supereulerian graphs in locally highly connected graphs

Given two nonnegative integers s and t, a graph G is (s,t)-supereulerian if for any disjoint sets X,Y⊂E(G) with |X|≤s and |Y|≤t, there is a spanning eulerian subgraph H of G that contains X and avoids Y. We prove that if G is connected and locally k-edge-connected, then G is (s,t)-supereulerian, for any pair of nonnegative integers s and t with s+t≤k−1. We further show that if s+t≤k and G is a connected, locally k-edge-connected graph, then for any disjoint sets X,Y⊂E(G) with |X|≤s and |Y≤t, there is a spanning eulerian subgraph H that contains X and avoids Y, if and only if G−Y is not contractible to K₂ or to K_2,l with l odd.     

A generalization of a conjecture due to Erd?s, Jacobson and Lehel

An r-graph is a loopless undirected graph in which no two vertices are joined by more than r edges. An r-complete graph on m+1 vertices, denoted by , is an r-graph on m+1 vertices in which each pair of vertices is joined by exactly r edges. A non-increasing sequence π=(d₁,d₂,…,d_n) of nonnegative integers is r-graphic if it is realizable by an r-graph on n vertices. Let be the smallest even integer such that each n-term r-graphic sequence with term sum of at least is realizable by an r-graph containing as a subgraph. In this paper, we determine the value of for sufficiently large n, which generalizes a conjecture due to Erd?s, Jacobson and Lehel.     

Linear-time certifying algorithms for near-graphical sequences

A sequence 〈d₁,d₂,…,d_n〉 of non-negative integers is graphical if it is the degree sequence of some graph, that is, there exists a graph G on n vertices whose ith vertex has degree d_i, for 1≤i≤n. The notion of a graphical sequence has a natural reformulation and generalization in terms of factors of complete graphs.If H=(V,E) is a graph and g and f are integer-valued functions on the vertex set V, then a (g,f)-factor of H is a subgraph G=(V,F) of H whose degree at each vertex v∈V lies in the interval [g(v),f(v)]. Thus, a (0,1)-factor is just a matching of H and a (1, 1)-factor is a perfect matching of H. If H is complete then a (g,f)-factor realizes a degree sequence that is consistent with the sequence of intervals 〈[g(v₁),f(v₁)],[g(v₂),f(v₂)],…,[g(v_n),f(v_n)]〉.Graphical sequences have been extensively studied and admit several elegant characterizations. We are interested in extending these characterizations to non-graphical sequences by introducing a natural measure of “near-graphical”. We do this in the context of minimally deficient (g,f)-factors of complete graphs. Our main result is a simple linear-time greedy algorithm for constructing minimally deficient (g,f)-factors in complete graphs that generalizes the method of Hakimi and Havel (for constructing (f,f)-factors in complete graphs, when possible). It has the added advantage of producing a certificate of minimum deficiency (through a generalization of the Erdös-Gallai characterization of (f,f)-factors in complete graphs) at no additional cost.     

Colouring games on outerplanar graphs and trees

Let f be a graph function which assigns to each graph H a non-negative integer f(H)≤|V(H)|. The f-game chromatic number of a graph G is defined through a two-person game. Let X be a set of colours. Two players, Alice and Bob, take turns colouring the vertices of G with colours from X. A partial colouring c of G is legal (with respect to graph function f) if for any subgraph H of G, the sum of the number of colours used in H and the number of uncoloured vertices of H is at least f(H). Both Alice and Bob must colour legally (i.e., the partial colouring produced needs to be legal). The game ends if either all the vertices are coloured or there are uncoloured vertices with no legal colour. In the former case, Alice wins the game. In the latter case, Bob wins the game. The f-game chromatic number of G, χ_g(f,G), is the least number of colours that the colour set X needs to contain so that Alice has a winning strategy. Let be the graph function defined as , for any n≥3 and otherwise. Then is called the acyclic game chromatic number of G. In this paper, we prove that any outerplanar graph G has acyclic game chromatic number at most 7. For any integer k, let ?_k be the graph function defined as ?_k(K₂)=2 and ?_k(P_k)=3 (P_k is the path on k vertices) and ?_k(H)=0 otherwise. This paper proves that if k≥8 then for any tree T, χ_g(?_k,T)≤9. On the other hand, if k≤6, then for any integer n, there is a tree T such that χ_g(?_k,T)≥n.     

Degree conditions for group connectivity

Let G be a 2-edge-connected simple graph on n≥13 vertices and A an (additive) abelian group with |A|≥4. In this paper, we prove that if for every uv∉E(G), max{d(u),d(v)}≥n/4, then either G is A-connected or G can be reduced to one of K_2,3,C₄ and C₅ by repeatedly contracting proper A-connected subgraphs, where C_k is a cycle of length k. We also show that the bound n≥13 is the best possible.     

Turán’s theorem inverted

In this note we complete an investigation started by Erd?s in 1963 that aims to find the strongest possible conclusion from the hypothesis of Turán’s theorem in extremal graph theory.Let be the complete r-partite graph with parts of sizes s₁≥2,s₂,…,s_r with an edge added to the first part. Letting t_r(n) be the number of edges of the r-partite Turán graph of order n, we prove that:For all r≥2 and all sufficiently small c>0, every graph of sufficiently large order n with t_r(n)+1 edges contains a .We also give a corresponding stability theorem and two supporting results of wider scope.     

Minimal rankings and the arank number of a path

Given a graph G, a function f:V(G)→{1,2,…,k} is a k-ranking of G if f(u)=f(v) implies every u-v path contains a vertex w such that f(w)>f(u). A k-ranking is minimal if the reduction of any label greater than 1 violates the described ranking property. The arank number of a graph, denoted ψ_r(G), is the largest k such that G has a minimal k-ranking. We present new results involving minimal k-rankings of paths. In particular, we determine ψ_r(P_n), a problem posed by Laskar and Pillone in 2000.     

Generalization of matching extensions in graphs (III)

Proposing them as a general framework, Liu and Yu (2001) [6] introduced (n,k,d)-graphs to unify the concepts of deficiency of matchings, n-factor-criticality and k-extendability. Let G be a graph and let n,k and d be non-negative integers such that n+2k+d+2?|V(G)| and |V(G)|−n−d is even. If on deleting any n vertices from G the remaining subgraph H of G contains a k-matching and each k-matching can be extended to a defect-d matching in H, then G is called an (n,k,d)-graph. In this paper, we obtain more properties of (n,k,d)-graphs, in particular the recursive relations of (n,k,d)-graphs for distinct parameters n,k and d. Moreover, we provide a characterization for maximal non-(n,k,d)-graphs.     

On time-relaxed broadcasting networks

Given a communication network (modelled as a graph), a message is transmitted to at one vertex transmits to all other vertices in such a way that each message transmission takes one time unit and each vertex participates in at most one transmission to its neighbor per time step. We call this process broadcasting. For t≥0, let B_t(n) be the number of edges in the sparsest possible graph on n vertices in which broadcasting can be accomplished in ⌈log₂n⌉+t steps regardless of the originator. Shastri [A. Shastri, Time-relaxed broadcasting in communication networks, Discrete Applied mathematics 83 (1998) 263-278] conjectured that B₁(22)=24 and B₂(n)=n+1 for 25≤n≤29. In this paper, we show that B₁(22)=24, B₂(n)=n for 25≤n≤28 and 37≤n≤44, B₂(n)≤n+1 for 45≤n≤49, B₂(n)≤n+4 for 50≤n≤56, and B₃(n)=n for 55≤n≤64.     

Bounds on isoperimetric values of trees

Let G=(V,E) be a finite, simple and undirected graph. For S⊆V, let δ(S,G)={(u,v)∈E:u∈S and v∈V−S} be the edge boundary of S. Given an integer i, 1≤i≤|V|, let the edge isoperimetric value of G at i be defined as b_e(i,G)=min_S⊆V;|S|=i|δ(S,G)|. The edge isoperimetric peak of G is defined as b_e(G)=max_1≤j≤|V|b_e(j,G). Let b_v(G) denote the vertex isoperimetric peak defined in a corresponding way. The problem of determining a lower bound for the vertex isoperimetric peak in complete t-ary trees was recently considered in [Y. Otachi, K. Yamazaki, A lower bound for the vertex boundary-width of complete k-ary trees, Discrete Mathematics, in press (doi:10.1016/j.disc.2007.05.014)]. In this paper we provide bounds which improve those in the above cited paper. Our results can be generalized to arbitrary (rooted) trees.The depth d of a tree is the number of nodes on the longest path starting from the root and ending at a leaf. In this paper we show that for a complete binary tree of depth d (denoted as ), and where c₁, c₂ are constants. For a complete t-ary tree of depth d (denoted as ) and d≥clogt where c is a constant, we show that and where c₁, c₂ are constants. At the heart of our proof we have the following theorem which works for an arbitrary rooted tree and not just for a complete t-ary tree. Let T=(V,E,r) be a finite, connected and rooted tree — the root being the vertex r. Define a weight function w:V→N where the weight w(u) of a vertex u is the number of its successors (including itself) and let the weight index η(T) be defined as the number of distinct weights in the tree, i.e η(T)=|{w(u):u∈V}|. For a positive integer k, let ?(k)=|{i∈N:1≤i≤|V|,b_e(i,G)≤k}|. We show that .     

Labeling graphs with two distance constraints

Given a graph G and integers p,q,d₁ and d₂, with p>q, d₂>d₁?1, an L(d₁,d₂;p,q)-labeling of G is a function f:V(G)→{0,1,2,…,n} such that |f(u)−f(v)|?p if d_G(u,v)?d₁ and |f(u)−f(v)|?q if d_G(u,v)?d₂. A k-L(d₁,d₂;p,q)-labeling is an L(d₁,d₂;p,q)-labeling f such that max_v∈V(G)f(v)?k. The L(d₁,d₂;p,q)-labeling number ofG, denoted by , is the smallest number k such that G has a k-L(d₁,d₂;p,q)-labeling. In this paper, we give upper bounds and lower bounds of the L(d₁,d₂;p,q)-labeling number for general graphs and some special graphs. We also discuss the L(d₁,d₂;p,q)-labeling number of G, when G is a path, a power of a path, or Cartesian product of two paths.     

Distance-two labellings of Hamming graphs

Let j≥k≥0 be integers. An ?-L(j,k)-labelling of a graph G=(V,E) is a mapping ?:V→{0,1,2,…,?} such that |?(u)−?(v)|≥j if u,v are adjacent and |?(u)−?(v)|≥k if they are distance two apart. Let λ_j,k(G) be the smallest integer ? such that G admits an ?-L(j,k)-labelling. Define to be the smallest ? if G admits an ?-L(j,k)-labelling with ?(V)={0,1,2,…,?} and ∞ otherwise. An ?-cyclic L(j,k)-labelling is a mapping ?:V→Z_? such that |?(u)−?(v)|_?≥j if u,v are adjacent and |?(u)−?(v)|_?≥k if they are distance two apart, where |x|_?=min{x,?−x} for x between 0 and ?. Let σ_j,k(G) be the smallest ?−1 of such a labelling, and define similarly to . We determine λ_2,0, , σ_2,0 and for all Hamming graphs K_q1□K_q2□?□K_qd (d≥2, q₁≥q₂≥?≥q_d≥2) and give optimal labellings, with the only exception being for q≥4. We also prove the following “sandwich theorem”: If q₁ is sufficiently large then for any graph G between K_q1□K_q2 and K_q1□K_q2□?□K_qd, and moreover we give a labelling which is optimal for these eight invariants simultaneously.     

Identifying codes and locating-dominating sets on paths and cycles

Let G=(V,E) be a graph and let r≥1 be an integer. For a set D⊆V, define N_r[x]={y∈V:d(x,y)≤r} and D_r(x)=N_r[x]∩D, where d(x,y) denotes the number of edges in any shortest path between x and y. D is known as an r-identifying code (r-locating-dominating set, respectively), if for all vertices x∈V (x∈V?D, respectively), D_r(x) are all nonempty and different. Roberts and Roberts [D.L. Roberts, F.S. Roberts, Locating sensors in paths and cycles: the case of 2-identifying codes, European Journal of Combinatorics 29 (2008) 72-82] provided complete results for the paths and cycles when r=2. In this paper, we provide results for a remaining open case in cycles and complete results in paths for r-identifying codes; we also give complete results for 2-locating-dominating sets in cycles, which completes the results of Bertrand et al. [N. Bertrand, I. Charon, O. Hudry, A. Lobstein, Identifying and locating-dominating codes on chains and cycles, European Journal of Combinatorics 25 (2004) 969-987].