Fermat-type configurations of lines in P3 and the containment problem

The purpose of this note is to show a new series of examples of homogeneous ideals I in $\mathbb{K}[x,y,z,w]$ for which the containment $I^{(3)}?I^2$ fails. These ideals are supported on certain arrangements of lines in ${\mathbb{P}}^3$, which resemble Fermat configurations of points in ${\mathbb{P}}^2$, see [14]. All examples exhibiting the failure of the containment $I^{(3)}?I^2$ constructed so far have been supported on points or cones over configurations of points. Apart from providing new counterexamples, these ideals seem quite interesting on their own.     

Complexity of simple modules over the Lie superalgebra osp(k|2)

The complexity of a module is the rate of growth of the minimal projective resolution of the module while the z-complexity is the rate of growth of the number of indecomposable summands at each step in the resolution. Let $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{osp}(k|2)$ ($k>2$) be the type II orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra of types B or D. In this paper, we compute the complexity and the z-complexity of the simple finite-dimensional $\mathfrak{g}$-supermodules. We then give these complexities certain geometric interpretations using support and associated varieties.     

The list L(2,1)-labeling of planar graphs

Let $\mathbf{N}$ be the set of all positive integers. A list assignment of a graph $G$ is a function $L:V\left(G\right)?2^{\mathbf{N}}$ that assigns each vertex $v$ a list $L\left(v\right)$ for all $v\in V\left(G\right)$. We say that $G$ is $L$-$(2,1)$-choosable if there exists a function $?$ such that $?\left(v\right)\in L\left(v\right)$ for all $v\in V\left(G\right)$, $|?\left(u\right)??\left(v\right)|\ge 2$ if $u$ and $v$ are adjacent, and $|?\left(u\right)??\left(v\right)|\ge 1$ if $u$ and $v$ are at distance 2. The list-$L(2,1)$-labeling number ${\lambda }_l\left(G\right)$ of $G$ is the minimum $k$ such that for every list assignment $L=\{L\left(v\right):|L\left(v\right)|=k,v\in V\left(G\right)\}$, $G$ is $L$-$(2,1)$-choosable. We prove that if $G$ is a planar graph with girth $g\ge 8$ and its maximum degree $\Delta$ is large enough, then ${\lambda }_l\left(G\right)\le \Delta +3$. There are graphs with large enough $\Delta$ and $g\ge 8$ having ${\lambda }_l\left(G\right)=\Delta +3$.