Spectra of Maximal 1-Sided Ideals and Primitive Ideals

R is any ring with identity. Let Spec _r (R) (resp. Max _r (R), Prim _r (R)) denote the set of all right prime ideals (resp. all maximal right ideals, all right primitive ideals) of R and let U _r (eR) = {P ? Spec _r (R)| e ? P}. Let  = ∪_{P?Prim r (R)} Spec _r ^P (R), where Spec _r ^P (R) = {Q ?Spec _r ^P (R)|P is the largest ideal contained in Q}. A ring is called right quasi-duo if every maximal right ideal is 2-sided. In this article, we study the properties of the weak Zariski topology on  and the relationships among various ring-theoretic properties and topological conditions on it. Then the following results are obtained for any ring R: (1) R is right quasi-duo ring if and only if  is a space with Zariski topology if and only if, for any Q ? , Q is irreducible as a right ideal in R. (2) For any clopen (i.e., closed and open) set U in ? = Max _r (R) ∪  Prim _r (R) (resp.  = Prim _r (R)) there is an element e in R with e ² ? e ? J(R) such that U = U _r (eR) ∩  ? (resp. U = U _r (eR) ∩  ), where J(R) is the Jacobson of R. (3) Max _r (R) ∪  Prim _r (R) is connected if and only if Max _l (R) ∪  Prim _l (R) is connected if and only if Prim _r (R) is connected.     

Monomorphism Operator and Perpendicular Operator

For a quiver Q, a k-algebra A, and an additive full subcategory 𝒳 of A-mod, the monomorphism category Mon(Q, 𝒳) is introduced. The main result says that if T is an A-module such that there is an exact sequence 0 → T _m  → … → T ₀ → D(A _A ) → 0 with each T _i  ∈ add(T), then Mon(Q, ^⊥ T) =^⊥(kQ ? _k T); and if T is cotilting, then kQ ? _k T is a unique cotilting Λ-module, up to multiplicities of indecomposable direct summands, such that Mon(Q, ^⊥ T) =^⊥(kQ ? _k T).

As applications, the category of the Gorenstein-projective (kQ ? _k A)-modules is characterized as Mon(Q, 𝒢𝒫(A)) if A is Gorenstein; the contravariantly finiteness of Mon(Q, 𝒳) can be described; and a sufficient and necessary condition for Mon(Q, A) being of finite type is given.     

On Strongly Stable Rings

Abstract

A ring R is called strongly stable if whenever aR + bR = R, there exists a w ∈ Q(R) such that a + bw ∈ U(R), where Q(R) = {x ∈ R ∣ ? e ? e ² ∈ J(R), u ∈ U(R) such that x = eu}. These rings are shown to be a natural generalization of semilocal rings and unit regular rings. We investigate the extensions of strongly stable rings. K ₁-groups of such rings are also studied. In this way we recover and extend some results of Menal and Moncasi.     

Invertibility of Matrices Over Subrings

Given rings R ? S, consider the division closure 𝒟(R, S) and the rational closure ?(R, S) of R in S. If S is commutative, then 𝒟(R, S) = ?(R, S) = RT ^?1, where T = {t ∈ R | t ^?1 ∈ S}. We show that this is also true if we assume only that R is commutative.     

On Finite Maximal Chains of Weak Baer Going-Down Rings

Some recent results of Ayache on going-down domains and extensions of domains that either are residually algebraic or have DCC on intermediate rings are generalized to the context of extensions of commutative rings. Given a finite maximal chain 𝒞 of R-subalgebras of a weak Baer ring T, it is shown how a “min morphism” hypothesis can be used to transfer the “going-down ring” property from R to each member of 𝒞. The integral minimal ring extensions which are min morphisms are classified. The ring extensions satisfying FCP (i.e., for which each chain of intermediate rings is finite) are characterized as the strongly affine extensions with DCC on intermediate rings. In the relatively integrally closed case, such extensions R ? T induce open immersions Spec(S) → Spec(R) for each R-subalgebra S of T.     

Rings with Zassenhaus Families of Ideals

Let R be a ring with identity. We call a family ? of left ideals of R a Zassenhaus family if the only additive endomorphisms of R that leave all members of ? invariant are the left multiplications by elements of R. Moreover, if R is torsion-free and there is some left R-module M such that R ? M ? R?_?? and End _?(M) = R we call R a “Zassenhaus ring”. It is well known that all Zassenhaus rings have Zassenhaus families. We will give examples to show that the converse does not hold even for torsion-free rings of finite rank.     

On the finiteness of a field-theoretic invariant for commutative rings

If T is a (commutative unital) ring extension of a ring R, then Λ(T /R) is defined to be the supremum of the lengths of chains of intermediate fields between R _P /P R _P and T _Q /QT _Q , where Q varies over Spec(T) and P:= Q ∩ R. The invariant σ(R):= sup Λ(T/R), where T varies over all the overrings of R. It is proved that if Λ(S/R)< ∞ for all rings S between R and T, then (R, T) is an INC-pair; and that if (R, T) is an INC-pair such that T is a finite-type R-algebra, then Λ(T/R)< ∞. Consequently, if R is a domain with σ(R) < ∞, then the integral closure of R is a Prüfer domain; and if R is a Noetherian G-domain, then σ(R) < ∞, with examples showing that σ(R) can be any given non-negative integer. Other examples include that of a onedimensional Noetherian locally pseudo-valuation domain R with σ(R)=∞.     

The Largest Left Quotient Ring of a Ring

The left quotient ring (i.e., the left classical ring of fractions) Q_cl(R) of a ring R does not always exist and still, in general, there is no good understanding of the reason why this happens. In this article, existence of the largest left quotient ring Q_l(R) of an arbitrary ring R is proved, i.e., Q_l(R) = S₀(R)^?1R where S₀(R) is the largest left regular denominator set of R. It is proved that Q_l(Q_l(R)) = Q_l(R); the ring Q_l(R) is semisimple iff Q_cl(R) exists and is semisimple; moreover, if the ring Q_l(R) is left Artinian, then Q_cl(R) exists and Q_l(R) = Q_cl(R). The group of units Q_l(R)* of Q_l(R) is equal to the set {s^?1t | s, t ∈ S₀(R)} and S₀(R) = R ∩ Q_l(R)*. If there exists a finitely generated flat left R-module which is not projective, then Q_l(R) is not a semisimple ring. We extend slightly Ore's method of localization to localizable left Ore sets, give a criterion of when a left Ore set is localizable, and prove that all left and right Ore sets of an arbitrary ring are localizable (not just denominator sets as in Ore's method of localization). Applications are given for certain classes of rings (semiprime Goldie rings, Noetherian commutative rings, the algebra of polynomial integro-differential operators).     

Classes of Commutative Rings Defined by Special Conditions

ABSTRACT

In this article, we are mainly concerned with (n, d)-Krull rings, i.e., rings in which each n-presented prime ideal has height at most d. Precisely, we show that weakly n-Von Neumann regular rings are (n ? 1, 0)-Krull rings. Also, we prove that (n, d)-Krull property is not local property and that R is an (n, d)-Krull ring if and only if dim(R _P ) ≤ d for each n-presented prime ideal P of R. Finally, we construct a class of (2, d)-Krull rings which are neither (2, d ? 1)-Krull rings (for d = 1) nor (1, d)-Krull rings for d = 0,1.     

Gaussian Polynomials and Content Ideal in Pullbacks

This article deals mainly with rings (with zerodivisors) in which regular Gaussian polynomials have locally principal contents. Precisely, we show that if (T,M) is a local ring which is not a field, D is a subring of T/M such that qf(D) = T/M, h: T → T/M is the canonical surjection and R = h ^?1(D), then if T satisfies the property “every regular Gaussian polynomial has locally principal content,” then also R verifies the same property. We also show that if D is a Prüfer domain and T satisfies the property “every Gaussian polynomial has locally principal content”, then R satisfies the same property. The article includes a brief discussion of the scopes and limits of our result.     

On finitely generated module whose first nonzero fitting ideal is maximal

Let R be a Noetherian ring and M be a finitely generated R-module. Let I(M) be the first nonzero Fitting ideal of M. The main result of this paper asserts that when I(M) = Q is a regular maximal ideal of R, then M?R∕Q⊕P, for some projective R-module P of constant rank if and only if T(M)?QM. As a consequence, it is shown that if M is an Artinian R-module and I(M) = Q is a regular maximal ideal of R, then M?R∕Q.     

On the Support Problem for Drinfeld Modules

Let Φ be a Drinfeld A-module over an A-field K of generic characteristic. We will prove the following two results which are analogous to ones in number fields. Case 1. Φ is of rank one. Suppose that P and Q are two nontorsion points in Φ(K). If for any element a ? A and almost all prime ideals 𝒫 in  one has that Φ _a (P) ≡ 0 (mod 𝒫) ? Φ _a (Q) ≡ 0 (mod 𝒫), then Q = Φ _m (P) for some m ? A. Case 2. Φ is of general rank ≥ 1. Let x, y ? Φ(K) be two K-rational points. Denote  = End _K (Φ) which is commutative and Λ =  · y which is a cyclic -module. Let red _v :Φ(K) → Φ(k _v ) be the reduction map at a place v of K with residue field k _v . If red _v (x) ? red _v (Λ) for almost all places v of K. Then f(x) = g(y), for some nonzero elements f and g in .     

On Triangulating Dimension of Rings

For any right essential overring T of a right FI-extending ring R, it is shown that 𝒯 dim(T) ≤ 𝒯dim(R), where 𝒯dim(?) is triangulating dimension of a ring. As a consequence, we show that for a ring R the maximal right ring of quotients, Q(R), is a direct product of finitely many prime rings if and only if Q(R) is semiprime and 𝒯dim(Q(R)) is finite. Some examples which illustrate and delimit the result are provided.     

Boolean Algebras,Generalized Abelian Rings,and Grothendieck Groups

ABSTRACT

A ring R is called generalized Abelian if for each idempotent e in R, eR and (1 ? e)R have no isomorphic nonzero summands. The class of generalized Abelian rings properly contains the class of Abelian rings. We denote by GAERS ? 1 the class of generalized Abelian exchange rings with stable range 1. In this article we prove, by introducing Boolean algebras, that for any R ∈ GAERS ? 1, the Grothendieck group K ₀(R) is always an Archimedean lattice-ordered group, and hence is torsion free and unperforated, which generalizes the corresponding results of Abelian exchange rings. Our main technical tool is the use of the ordered structure of K ₀(R)⁺, which provides a new method in the study of Grothendieck groups.     

On Strongly Essential Submodules

The submodules with the property of the title (N ? M is strongly essential in M if ∏ _I N is essential in ∏ _I M for any index set I) are introduced and fully investigated.

It is shown that for each submodule N of M there exists a subset T ? M such that N + T is strongly essential submodule of M and (N:T) = Ann(T), T  ∩  N = 0. Basic properties of these objects and several examples are given and the counterparts of the related concepts to essential submodules are also introduced and studied. It is shown that each maximal left ideal of a left fully bounded ring is either a summand or strongly essential. Rings over which no module has a proper strongly essential submodule are characterized. It is also shown that the left Loewy rings are the only rings over which the essential submodules and strongly essential submodules of any left module coincide. Finally, a new characterization of left FBN rings is observed.     

Right Centralizers of Semiprime Rings

Let R be a semiprime ring with Q _ml (R) the maximal left ring of quotients of R. Suppose that T: R → Q _ml (R) is an additive map satisfying T(x ²) = xT(x) for all x ∈ R. Then T is a right centralizer; that is, there exists a ∈ Q _ml (R) such that T(x) = xa for all x ∈ R.     

When is a Sum of Annihilator Ideals an Annihilator Ideal?

We call a ring R a right SA-ring if for any ideals I and J of R there is an ideal K of R such that r(I) + r(J) = r(K). This class of rings is exactly the class of rings for which the lattice of right annihilator ideals is a sublattice of the lattice of ideals. The class of right SA-rings includes all quasi-Baer (hence all Baer) rings and all right IN-rings (hence all right selfinjective rings). This class is closed under direct products, full and upper triangular matrix rings, certain polynomial rings, and two-sided rings of quotients. The right SA-ring property is a Morita invariant. For a semiprime ring R, it is shown that R is a right SA-ring if and only if R is a quasi-Baer ring if and only if r(I) + r(J) = r(I ∩ J) for all ideals I and J of R if and only if Spec(R) is extremally disconnected. Examples are provided to illustrate and delimit our results.