On the chromatic number of some P5-free graphs

Let G be a graph. We say that G is perfectly divisible if for each induced subgraph H of G, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into A and B such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $\omega (H[B])<\omega (H)$. We use $P_t$ and $C_t$ to denote a path and a cycle on t vertices, respectively. For two disjoint graphs $F_1$ and $F_2$, we use $F_1\cup F_2$ to denote the graph with vertex set $V(F_1)\cup V(F_2)$ and edge set $E(F_1)\cup E(F_2)$, and use $F_1+F_2$ to denote the graph with vertex set $V(F_1)\cup V(F_2)$ and edge set $E(F_1)\cup E(F_2)\cup \{xy|x\in V(F_1)\text{ and }y\in V(F_2)\}$. In this paper, we prove that (i) $(P_5,C_5,K_{2,3})$-free graphs are perfectly divisible, (ii) $\chi (G)\le 2{\omega }^2(G)?\omega (G)?3$ if G is $(P_5,K_{2,3})$-free with $\omega (G)\ge 2$, (iii) $\chi (G)\le \frac{3}{2}({\omega }^2(G)?\omega (G))$ if G is $(P_5,K_1+2K_2)$-free, and (iv) $\chi (G)\le 3\omega (G)+11$ if G is $(P_5,K_1+(K_1\cup K_3))$-free.     

Existence of solutions of a non-linear eigenvalue problem with a variable weight

We study the non-linear minimization problem on $H_0^1(\mathrm{\Omega })?L^q$ with $q=\frac{2n}{n?2}$, $\alpha >0$ and $n\ge 4$:

$\underset{\begin{array}{c}\hfill u\in H_0^1(\mathrm{\Omega })\hfill \\ \hfill {6u6}_{L^q}=1\hfill \end{array}}{\inf }?\underset{\mathrm{\Omega }}{\int }a(x,u)|\mathrm{?}u{|}^2?\lambda \underset{\mathrm{\Omega }}{\int }|u{|}^2$

where $a(x,s)$ presents a global minimum α at $(x_0,0)$ with $x_0\in \mathrm{\Omega }$. In order to describe the concentration of $u(x)$ around $x_0$, one needs to calibrate the behavior of $a(x,s)$ with respect to s. The model case is

$\underset{\begin{array}{c}\hfill u\in H_0^1(\mathrm{\Omega })\hfill \\ \hfill {6u6}_{L^q}=1\hfill \end{array}}{\inf }?\underset{\mathrm{\Omega }}{\int }(\alpha +|x{|}^{\beta }|u{|}^k)|\mathrm{?}u{|}^2?\lambda \underset{\mathrm{\Omega }}{\int }|u{|}^2.$

In a previous paper dedicated to the same problem with $\lambda =0$, we showed that minimizers exist only in the range $\beta <kn/q$, which corresponds to a dominant non-linear term. On the contrary, the linear influence for $\beta \ge kn/q$ prevented their existence. The goal of this present paper is to show that for $0<\lambda \le \alpha {\lambda }_1(\mathrm{\Omega })$, $0\le k\le q?2$ and $\beta >kn/q+2$, minimizers do exist.     

The component counts of random functions

Consider functions $f:A\to A\cup C$, where A and C are disjoint finite sets. The weakly connected components of the digraph of such a function are cycles of rooted trees, as in random mappings, and isolated rooted trees. Let $n_1=|A|$ and $n_3=|C|$. When a function is chosen from all ${(n_1+n_3)}^{n_1}$ possibilities uniformly at random, then we find the following limiting behaviour as $n_1\to \infty$. If $n_3=o(n_1)$, then the size of the maximal mapping component goes to infinity almost surely; if $n_3～\gamma n_1$, $\gamma >0$ a constant, then process counting numbers of mapping components of different sizes converges; if $n_1=o(n_3)$, then the number of mapping components converges to 0 in probability. We get estimates on the size of the largest tree component which are of order $\log ?n_3$ when $n_3～\gamma n_1$ and constant when $n_3～n_1^{\alpha }$, $\alpha >1$. These results are similar to ones obtained previously for random injections, for which the weakly connected components are cycles and linear trees.     

On the concentration phenomenon of L2-subcritical constrained minimizers for a class of Kirchhoff equations with potentials

In this paper, we study the existence and concentration behavior of minimizers for $i_V(c)=\underset{u\in S_c}{\inf }?I_V(u)$, here $S_c=\{u\in H^1({\mathbb{R}}^N)|{\int }_{{\mathbb{R}}^N}V(x)|u{|}^2<+\infty ,|u{|}_2=c>0\}$ and

$I_V(u)=\frac{1}{2}\underset{{\mathbb{R}}^N}{\int }(a|\mathrm{?}u{|}^2+V(x)|u{|}^2)+\frac{b}{4}{(\underset{{\mathbb{R}}^N}{\int }|\mathrm{?}u{|}^2)}^2?\frac{1}{p}\underset{{\mathbb{R}}^N}{\int }|u{|}^p,$

where $N=1,2,3$ and $a,b>0$ are constants. By the Gagliardo–Nirenberg inequality, we get the sharp existence of global constraint minimizers of $i_V(c)$ for $2<p<2^{?}$ when $V(x)\ge 0$, $V(x)\in {L^{\infty }}_{loc}({\mathbb{R}}^N)$ and $\underset{|x|\to +\infty }{\lim }?V(x)=+\infty$. For the case $p\in (2,\frac{2N+8}{N})\backslash \{4\}$, we prove that the global constraint minimizers $u_c$ of $i_V(c)$ behave like

$u_c(x)\approx \frac{c}{|Q_p{|}_2}{\left(\frac{m_c}{c}\right)}^{\frac{N}{2}}{Q}_p(\frac{m_c}{c}x?z_c),$

for some $z_c\in {\mathbb{R}}^N$ when c is large, where $Q_p$ is, up to translations, the unique positive solution of $?\frac{N(p?2)}{4}\mathrm{\Delta }{Q}_p+\frac{2N?p(N?2)}{4}{Q}_p=|Q_p{|}^{p?2}{Q}_p$ in ${\mathbb{R}}^N$ and $m_c={(\frac{\sqrt{a^2{D}_1^2?4b{D}_2{i}_0(c)}+a{D}_1}{2b{D}_2})}^{\frac{1}{2}}$, $D_1=\frac{Np?2N?4}{2N(p?2)}$ and $D_2=\frac{2N+8?Np}{4N(p?2)}$.     

The behavior of differential forms under purely inseparable extensions

Let F be a field of characteristic 2. In this paper we give a complete computation of the kernel of the homomorphism $H_2^{m+1}(F)?H_2^{m+1}(L)$ induced by scalar extension, where $L/F$ is a purely inseparable extension (of any degree), $H_2^{m+1}(F)$ is the cokernel of the Artin–Schreier operator $?:{\mathrm{\Omega }}_F^m?{\mathrm{\Omega }}_F^m/\mathrm{d}{\mathrm{\Omega }}_F^{m?1}$ given by: $x\frac{\mathrm{d}{x}_1}{x_1}\wedge ?\wedge \frac{\mathrm{d}{x}_m}{x_m}?(x^2?x)\frac{\mathrm{d}{x}_1}{x_1}\wedge ?\wedge \frac{\mathrm{d}{x}_m}{x_m}+\mathrm{d}{\mathrm{\Omega }}_F^{m?1}$, where ${\mathrm{\Omega }}_F^m$ is the space of absolute m-differential forms over F and d is the differential operator. Other related results are included.     

Point interactions for 3D sub-Laplacians

In this paper we show that, for a sub-Laplacian Δ on a 3-dimensional manifold M, no point interaction centered at a point $q_0\in M$ exists. When M is complete w.r.t. the associated sub-Riemannian structure, this means that Δ acting on $C_0^{\infty }(M?\{q_0\})$ is essentially self-adjoint in $L^2(M)$. A particular example is the standard sub-Laplacian on the Heisenberg group. This is in stark contrast with what happens in a Riemannian manifold N, whose associated Laplace-Beltrami operator acting on $C_0^{\infty }(N?\{q_0\})$ is never essentially self-adjoint in $L^2(N)$, if $\dim ?N\le 3$. We then apply this result to the Schrödinger evolution of a thin molecule, i.e., with a vanishing moment of inertia, rotating around its center of mass.