Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation

In data envelopment analysis (DEA), the cross-efficiency evaluation method introduces a cross-efficiency matrix, in which the units are self and peer evaluated. A problem that possibly reduces the usefulness of the cross-efficiency evaluation method is that the cross-efficiency scores may not be unique due to the presence of alternate optima. So, it is recommended that secondary goals be introduced in cross-efficiency evaluation. In this paper we propose the symmetric weight assignment technique (SWAT) that does not affect feasibility and rewards decision making units (DMUs) that make a symmetric selection of weights. A numerical example is solved by our proposed method and its solution is compared with those of alternative approaches.     

Dominance relations and ranking of units by using interval number ordering with cross-efficiency intervals

This paper proposes an approach to the cross-efficiency evaluation that considers all the optimal data envelopment analysis (DEA) weights of all the decision-making units (DMUs), thus avoiding the need to make a choice among them according to some alternative secondary goal. To be specific, we develop a couple of models that allow for all the possible weights of all the DMUs simultaneously and yield individual lower and upper bounds for the cross-efficiency scores of the different units. As a result, we have a cross-efficiency interval for the evaluation of each unit. Existing order relations for interval numbers are used to identify dominance relations among DMUs and derive a ranking of units based on the cross-efficiency intervals provided. The approach proposed may also be useful for assessing the stability of the cross-efficiency scores with respect to DEA weights that can be used for their calculation.     

Slack-based ranking method: an interpretation to the cross-efficiency method in DEA

The cross-efficiency method is generally utilized to rank decision-making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA) based on peer-evaluation logic. This brief note provides a method of using the available information from the linear program outputs to calculate the ranking of all DMUs with fewer computations and offers an alternative interpretation to the cross-efficiency method based on slack analysis in DEA.     

DEA models for minimizing weight disparity in cross-efficiency evaluation

Cross-efficiency evaluation is a commonly used approach for ranking decision-making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The weights used in the cross-efficiency evaluation may sometimes differ significantly among the inputs and outputs. This paper proposes some alternative DEA models to minimize the virtual disparity in the cross-efficiency evaluation. The proposed DEA models determine the input and output weights of each DMU in a neutral way without being aggressive or benevolent to the other DMUs. Numerical examples are tested to show the validity and effectiveness of the proposed DEA models and illustrate their significant role in reducing the number of zero weights.     

Cross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approach

Cross-efficiency in data envelopment analysis (DEA) models is an effective way to rank decision-making units (DMUs). The common methods to aggregate cross-efficiency do not consider the preference structure of the decision maker (DM). When a DM’s preference structure does not satisfy the “additive independence” condition, a new aggregation method must be proposed. This paper uses the evidential-reasoning (ER) approach to aggregate the cross-efficiencies obtained from cross-evaluation through the transformation of the cross-efficiency matrix to pieces of evidence. This paper provides a new method for cross-efficiency aggregation and a new way for DEA models to reflect a DM’s preference or value judgments. Additionally, this paper presents examples that demonstrate the features of cross-efficiency aggregation using the ER approach, including an empirical example of the evaluation practice of 16 basic research institutes in Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) in 2010 that illustrates how the ER approach can be used to aggregate the cross-efficiency matrix produced from DEA models.     

Meta-frontier analysis using cross-efficiency method for performance evaluation

Efficiency overestimation and technology heterogeneity are important factors that affect the use of data envelopment analysis. This paper introduces a meta-frontier analysis framework into a cross-efficiency method to develop a new efficiency evaluation method. This method can be used to calculate, aggregate, and decompose the cross efficiencies relative to the meta-frontier and group-frontier. Then the technology gap between these frontiers can be measured and more detailed information regarding the inefficiency of decision-making units can be obtained. This enables decision makers to improve efficiency in a targeted manner. Subsequently, the non-uniqueness of the optimal solution is discussed for the new method, and the cross-evaluation strategy is introduced to ensure the stability of the optimal solution. Finally, two examples are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of this method.     

Efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis by using TOPSIS-DEA method

Data envelopment analysis methods classify the decision making units into two groups: efficient and inefficient ones. Therefore, the fully ranking all DMUs is demanded by most of the decision makers. However, data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making units are developed independently and designed for different purposes. However, there are some applications in problem solving such as ranking, where these two methods are combined. Combination of multiple criteria decision making methods with data envelopment analysis is a new idea for elimination of disadvantages when applied independently. In this paper, first the new combined method is proposed named TOPSIS-DEA for ranking efficient units which not only includes the benefits of both data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making methods, but also solves the issues that appear in former methods. Then properties and advantages of the suggested method are discussed and compared with super efficiency method, MAJ method, statistical-based model (CCA), statistical-based model (DR/DEA), cross-efficiency—aggressive, cross-efficiency—benevolent, Liang et al.’s model, through several illustrative examples. Finally, the proposed methods are validated.     

DEA cross-efficiency evaluation under variable returns to scale

Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been developed under the assumption of constant returns to scale (CRS), and no valid attempts have been made to apply the cross-efficiency concept to the variable returns to scale (VRS) condition. This is due to the fact that negative VRS cross-efficiency arises for some decision-making units (DMUs). Since there exist many instances that require the use of the VRS DEA model, it is imperative to develop cross-efficiency measures under VRS. We show that negative VRS cross-efficiency is related to free production of outputs. We offer a geometric interpretation of the relationship between the CRS and VRS DEA models. We show that each DMU, via solving the VRS model, seeks an optimal bundle of weights with which its CRS-efficiency score, measured under a translated Cartesian coordinate system, is maximized. We propose that VRS cross-efficiency evaluation should be done via a series of CRS models under translated Cartesian coordinate systems. The current study offers a valid cross-efficiency approach under the assumption of VRS—one of the most common assumptions in performance evaluation done by DEA.     

Fuzzy cross-efficiency evaluation: a possibility approach

Cross-efficiency evaluation is an extension of data envelopment analysis (DEA) aimed at ranking decision making units (DMUs) involved in a production process regarding their efficiency. As has been done with other enhancements and extensions of DEA, in this paper we propose a fuzzy approach to the cross-efficiency evaluation. Specifically, we develop a fuzzy cross-efficiency evaluation based on the possibility approach by Lertworasirikul et al. (Fuzzy Sets Syst 139:379–394, 2003a) to fuzzy DEA. Thus, a methodology for ranking DMUs is presented that may be used when data are imprecise, in particular for fuzzy inputs and outputs being normal and convex. We prove some results that allow us to define “consistent” cross-efficiencies. The ranking of DMUs for a given possibility level results from an ordering of cross-efficiency scores, which are real numbers. As in the crisp case, we also develop benevolent and aggressive fuzzy formulations in order to deal with the alternate optima for the weights.     

Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context

Within data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a sub-group of papers in which many researchers have sought to improve the differential capabilities of DEA and to fully rank both efficient, as well as inefficient, decision-making units. The ranking methods have been divided in this paper into six, somewhat overlapping, areas. The first area involves the evaluation of a cross-efficiency matrix, in which the units are self and peer evaluated. The second idea, generally known as the super-efficiency method, ranks through the exclusion of the unit being scored from the dual linear program and an analysis of the change in the Pareto Frontier. The third grouping is based on benchmarking, in which a unit is highly ranked if it is chosen as a useful target for many other units. The fourth group utilizes multivariate statistical techniques, which are generally applied after the DEA dichotomic classification. The fifth research area ranks inefficient units through proportional measures of inefficiency. The last approach requires the collection of additional, preferential information from relevant decision-makers and combines multiple-criteria decision methodologies with the DEA approach. However, whilst each technique is useful in a specialist area, no one methodology can be prescribed here as the complete solution to the question of ranking.     

基于传递性的效率评价及改进

现有交叉效率矩阵中往往会存在一些同行效率评价远低于自我效率评价的情形,即出现同行间的恶意评价。本文将第三方作为间接元素,考虑到这些间接元素在效率评价矩阵中具有传递性,引入间接判断结果对原有的交叉效率矩阵进行反复迭代,并证明迭代过程的最终稳定性。迭代的最终结果可以消除效率矩阵中的恶意评价元素,得到新的效率评价矩阵。最后,通过算例来说明模型的可行性和实用性。     

Context-dependent data envelopment analysis with cross-efficiency evaluation

To address some problems with the original context-dependent data envelopment analysis (DEA), this paper proposes a new version of context-dependent DEA; this version is based on cross-efficiency evaluations. One of the problems with the original context-dependent DEA is that the attractiveness and progress measures only represent the radial distance between the decision-making unit (DMU) under evaluation and the evaluation context. This representation only shows how distinct the DMU is from a single specific DMU on the evaluation context, not from the entire evaluation context overall. Another problem is that the magnitude of attractiveness and progress scores in the original context-dependent DEA may not have significant meanings. It may not be proper to say that a DMU is more attractive simply because it has a higher attractiveness score for the same reason that the performance of inefficient DMUs cannot be compared with one another simply based on their efficiency scores. We incorporate cross-efficiency evaluations into the context-dependent DEA to overcome the preceding shortcomings of the original context-dependent DEA. We also demonstrate the proposed model's appropriateness and usefulness with an illustrative example.     

基于前景理论和熵权法的交叉效率集结方法

传统的交叉效率集结过程通常采用算术平均方法,不仅会低估自评的重要性,而且未考虑决策者的风险偏好。针对上述问题,提出一种基于前景理论和熵权法的交叉效率集结方法。首先,求解交叉效率矩阵,运用熵权法确定他评过程中评价单元的指标权重。然后,引入前景理论以考虑决策者在交叉效率集结过程中的风险偏好,利用TOPSIS方法识别正负参考点,进而构造总体效用函数,得到前景交叉效率矩阵。随后,构建最大化前景价值模型,求解集结权重。该方法既考虑到交叉效率集结的相对重要性权重,又将决策者的风险偏好纳入到效率评价中,从而实现决策单元的全排序。最后,结合实例验证方法的有效性。     

DEA Cobb–Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency

The current paper examines the cross-efficiency concept in data envelopment analysis (DEA). While cross-efficiency has appeal as a peer evaluation approach, it is often the subject of criticism, due mainly to the use of DEA weights that are often non-unique. As a result, cross-efficiency scores are routinely viewed as arbitrary in that they depend on a particular set of optimal DEA weights generated by the computer code in use at the time. While imposing secondary goals can reduce the variability of cross-efficiency scores, such approaches do not completely solve the problem of non-uniqueness, and meaningful secondary goals can lead to computationally intractable non-linear programs. The current paper proposes to use the units-invariant multiplicative DEA model to calculate the cross-efficiency scores. This allows one to calculate the maximum cross-efficiency score for each DMU in a converted linear model, and eliminates the need for imposing secondary goals.     

Approaches to determining the relative importance weights for cross-efficiency aggregation in data envelopment analysis

Cross-efficiency evaluation has been widely used for identifying the most efficient decision making unit (DMU) or ranking DMUs in data envelopment analysis (DEA). Most existing approaches for cross-efficiency evaluation are focused on how to determine input and output weights uniquely, but pay little attention to the aggregation process of cross-efficiencies and simply aggregate them equally without considering their relative importance. This paper focuses on aggregating cross-efficiencies by taking into consideration their relative importance and proposes three alternative approaches to determining the relative importance weights for cross-efficiency aggregation. Numerical examples are examined to show the importance and necessity of the use of relative importance weights for cross-efficiency aggregation and the most efficient DMU can be significantly affected by taking into consideration the relative importance weights of cross-efficiencies.     

基于DEA方法的地下防护工程养护价值评价

针对地下防护工程的养护修缮情况,构建养护价值评价指标体系,引入数据包络分析方法(DEA),采用对抗交叉评价模型,对多个作为DEA决策单元的地下防护工程进行了分析和评价,最终对地下防护工程养护价值的优先级给出合理评价,利用数据包络分析方法(DEA)对抗交叉评价模型能够较客观地反映地下防护工程的养护价值,具有概念清晰、过程直观、程序计算简单等特点,获得了比较满意的结果.     

Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis

In this paper we present a method, based on the use of proportions, for restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. This method is applicable when the decision-making units being evaluated have multiple inputs and outputs.     

离差最大化时基于交叉评价的多属性决策方法

针对属性权重完全未知,且评价系统内既有客观数据、又有主观因素的多属性决策问题,提出一种基于离差最大化和交叉评价的模糊多属性决策方法。该方法首先定义了最小交叉效率、最大交叉效率等概念,将量化指标用交叉评价方法进行处理;然后采用模糊综合评价方法评价非量化指标,并基于离差最大化思想确定权重;最后将模糊化处理之后的量化指标与非量化指标一起进行最终评价,建立离差最大化条件下基于交叉评价的模糊多属性决策模型。最后通过算例验证了方法的可行性及有效性。     

A new method for complete ranking of DMUs

So far numerous models have been proposed for ranking the efficient decision-making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). But, the most shortcoming of these models is their two-stage orientation. That is, firstly we have to find efficient DMUs and then rank them. Another flaw of some of these models, like AP-model (A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 39 (10) (1993) 1261–1264), is existence of a non-Archimedean number in their objective function. Besides, when there is more than one weak efficient unit (or non-extreme efficient unit) these models could not rank DMUs. In this paper, we employ hyperplanes of the production possibility set (PPS) and propose a new method for complete ranking of DMUs in DEA. The proposed approach is a one stage method which ranks all DMUs (efficient and inefficient). In addition to ranking, the proposed method determines the type of efficiency for each DMU, simultaneously. Numerical examples are given to show applicability of the proposed method.     

Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency

In many managerial applications, situations frequently occur when a fixed cost is used in constructing the common platform of an organization, and needs to be shared by all related entities, or decision making units (DMUs). It is of vital importance to allocate such a cost across DMUs where there is competition for resources. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been successfully used in cost and resource allocation problems. Whether it is a cost or resource allocation issue, one needs to consider both the competitive and cooperative situation existing among DMUs in addition to maintaining or improving efficiency. The current paper uses the cross-efficiency concept in DEA to approach cost and resource allocation problems. Because DEA cross-efficiency uses the concept of peer appraisal, it is a very reasonable and appropriate mechanism for allocating a shared resource/cost. It is shown that our proposed iterative approach is always feasible, and ensures that all DMUs become efficient after the fixed cost is allocated as an additional input measure. The cross-efficiency DEA-based iterative method is further extended into a resource-allocation setting to achieve maximization in the aggregated output change by distributing available resources. Such allocations for fixed costs and resources are more acceptable to the players involved, because the allocation results are jointly determined by all DMUs rather than a specific one. The proposed approaches are demonstrated using an existing data set that has been applied in similar studies.