区传递的2-(v,9,1)设计的分类

讨论区传递的2-(v,k,1)设计的分类问题.特别地,讨论自同构群的基柱为典型单群的区传递,点本原但非旗传递的2-(v,9,1)设计.设D为一个2-(v,9,1)设计,若G≤Aut(D)是区传递,点本原但非旗传递的,则G的基柱Soc(G)不是有限域GF(q)上的典型单群.结合Camina,Praeger,刘伟俊,李慧陵...     

例外Lie型单群与旗传递三平面

三平面也称为2-（v,k,3）对称设计.设D是一个三平面,且G是D的全自同构群Aut（D）的一个子群.本文证明了若G是旗传递和点本原的,则G的基柱不可能是例外Lie型单群.     

Suzuki群与Steiner 4设计

本文研究了非平凡Steiner 4设计的自同构群是旗传递的情形.利用有限2传递置换群的分类,得到了旗传递非平凡Steiner 4设计的自同构群的基柱不是Suzuki群.     

旗传递5-(v,k,2)设计的分类

本文研究了5-(v,k,2)设计的分类问题.利用典型群PSL(2,q)的子群作用于投影线的轨道定理,证明了旗传递5-(v,k,2)设计的自同构群的基柱不能与PSL(2,3n)同构.从而证明了不存在旗传递的5-(v,k,2)设计.     

自同构群基柱为~3D_4(q)的2-(v,k,1)设计

2-(v,k,1)设计的存在性问题是组合设计理论中重要的问题,当这类设计具有一个有意义自同构群时,讨论其存在性是尤其令人感兴趣的.30年前,一个6人团队基本上完成了旗传递的2-(v,k,1)设计分类.此后,人们开始致力于研究区传递但非旗传递的2-(v,k,1)设计的分类课题.本文证明了自同构群基柱为~3D_4(q)的区传递及点本原非旗传递的2-(v,k,1)设计是不存在的.     

交错群与旗传递点本原非对称2-（v，k，3）设计

受旗传递2-(v,k,3)对称设计和非对称2-(v,k,2)设计有关分类结果的启发,本论文继续研究旗传递非对称2-(v,k,3)设计.文章利用置换群的理论和组合设计的数量性质,借助计算机代数软件Gap和Magma,完全分类了自同构群G旗传递点本原,且基柱Soc(G)为交错群An(n≥5)的非对称2-(v,k,3)设计,证明了此类设计只能是唯一的2-(5,3,3)设计,且G=A_5或S_5.     

区传递的2-(ν,κ,1)设计与李型单群E8(q)

分类自同构群的基柱为李型单群E8(q)的区传递2-(ν,κ,1)设计,得到如下定理:设D为一个2-(ν,κ,1)设计,G≤Aut(D)是区传递、点本原但非旗传递的.若q＞24√(krk-kr 1)f(这里kr=(k,v-1),q=pf,p是素数,f是正整数),则Soc(G)(≠)E8(q).     

作用在有限线性空间上基柱为2F4(q)的几乎单群

本文研究了基柱同构于2F4(q)的线传递的几乎单群.利用了有限线性空间上线传递的自同构群的经典结论,以及2F4(q)的阶和极大子群等性质,获得了点稳定子群和线稳定子群的分类.     

区传递的2-（v，k，1）设计与李型单群E8（q）

分类自同构群的基柱为李型单群E8（q）的区传递2-（v，k，1）设计，得到如下定理：设D为一个2-（v，k，1）设计，G≤Aut（D）是区传递、点本原但非旗传递的．若q〉24√（krk-kr＋1）f（这里kr=（k，v-1），q=p^f，p是素数，f是正整数），则Soc（G）≌／E8（q）．     

马休群与斯坦诺5设计

讨论了马体群旗传递作用于斯坦诺5设计上的情况，得到了如下结论：设D=（X，Ω，I）是非平凡的斯坦诺5设计，D的自同构群G旗传递地作用在D上。若G是几乎单群，则 （i）基柱Soc（G）不是下列单群：N=Mv，v=11，22，23和N=M11,v=12 （ii）若N=M12，v=12，则D是一个5-（12，6，1）设计，且G M12 （iii）若N=M24，v=24，则D是一个5-（24，8，1）设计，且G M24。     

旗传递点本原且基柱为${\rm PSL}_n(q)$的$(v,k,4)$-对称设计

若$\cal D$为一个非平凡旗传递点本原对称$(v,k,4)$设计, 其基柱为${\rm PSL}_n(q)$且$G\leq {\rm Aut}(\cal D)$. 那么, $\cal D$ 必为$2$-$(15,8,4)$设计且${\rm Soc}(G)={\rm PSL}_2(9)$.     

区传递的$2-(v, k, 1)$ 设计与单群$E_6(q)$

This article is a contribution to the study of block-transitive automorphism groups of 2-（v,k,1） block designs. Let D be a 2-（v,k,1） design admitting a block-transitive, pointprimitive but not flag-transitive automorphism group G. Let kr = （k,v-1） and q = pf for prime p. In this paper we prove that if G and D are as above and q （3（krk-kr ＋ 1）f）1/3, then G does not admit a simple group E6（q） as its socle.     

Sporadic groups and flag-transitive triplanes

Let D be a triplane, i.e., a 2-(v,k,3) symmetric design, and G be a subgroup of the full automorphism group of D. In this paper we prove that if G is flag-transitive point-primitive, then the socle of G cannot be a sporadic simple group.     

Exceptional groups of Lie type and flag-transitive triplanes

A triplane is a ( v, k, 3)-symmetric design. Let G be a subgroup of the full automorphism group of a triplane D. In this paper we prove that if G is flag-transitive and point-primitive, then the socle of G cannot be a simple exceptional group of Lie type.     

2-(v,23,1)设计的传递自同构群（英文）

This paper is a contribution to the study of the automorphism groups of 2-(v, k, 1) designs. Let D be a 2-(v, 23, 1) design and G a block-transitive and point-primitive group of automorphism of D. Then the socle of G is not Sz(q) and ~2G_2(q).Key words: block-transitive; point-primitive; design; socle     

The classification of flag-transitive Steiner 4-designs

Among the properties of homogeneity of incidence structures flag-transitivity obviously is a particularly important and natural one. Consequently, in the last decades flag-transitive Steinert-designs (i.e. flag-transitive t-(v,k,1) designs) have been investigated, whereas only by the use of the classification of the finite simple groups has it been possible in recent years to essentially characterize all flag-transitive Steiner 2-designs. However, despite the finite simple group classification, for Steiner t-designs with parameters t > 2 such characterizations have remained challenging open problems for about 40 years (cf. [11, p. 147] and [12 p. 273], but presumably dating back to around 1965). The object of the present paper is to give a complete classification of all flag-transitive Steiner 4-designs. Our result relies on the classification of the finite doubly transitive permutation groups and is a continuation of the author's work [20, 21] on the classification of all flag-transitive Steiner 3-designs. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 51E10 . Secondary 05B05 . 20B25     

Flag-transitive 2- $$(v,k,\lambda )$$ ( v,k , λ ) designs with $$r>\lambda (k-3)$$ r > λ ( k - 3 )

Designs, Codes and Cryptography - In this paper, we study the flag-transitive automorphism groups of 2-designs and prove that if G is a flag-transitive automorphism group of a 2-design $$\mathcal...