Minimum 2-tuple dominating set of permutation graphs

For a fixed positive integer k, a k-tuple dominating set of a graph G=(V,E) is a subset D?V such that every vertex in V is dominated by at least k vertex in D. The k-tuple domination number γ _×k (G) is the minimum size of a k-tuple dominating set of G. The special case when k=1 is the usual domination. The case when k=2 was called double domination or 2-tuple domination. A 2-tuple dominating set D ₂ is said to be minimal if there does not exist any D′?D ₂ such that D′ is a 2-tuple dominating set of G. A 2-tuple dominating set D ₂, denoted by γ _×2(G), is said to be minimum, if it is minimal as well as it gives 2-tuple domination number. In this paper, we present an efficient algorithm to find a minimum 2-tuple dominating set on permutation graphs with n vertices which runs in O(n ²) time.     

Edge-disjoint spanners in tori

A spanning subgraph S=(V,E^′) of a connected graph G=(V,E) is an (x+c)-spanner if for any pair of vertices u and v, d_S(u,v)≤d_G(u,v)+c where d_G and d_S are the usual distance functions in G and S, respectively. The parameter c is called the delay of the spanner. We study edge-disjoint spanners in graphs in multi-dimensional tori. We show that each two-dimensional torus has a set of two edge-disjoint spanners of delay approximately the size of the smaller dimension. Moreover, we show that this delay is close to the best possible. In three-dimensional tori, we find a set of three edge-disjoint spanners with delay approximately the sum of the sizes of the two smaller dimensions when all dimensions are of even size. Surprisingly, we also find a set of two edge-disjoint spanners in three-dimensional tori of constant delay. In d-dimensional tori, we show that for any k≤d/5, there is a set of k edge-disjoint spanners with delay depending only on k and the size of the smaller k dimensions.     

A linear algorithm for the domination number of a series-parallel graph

A vertex u in an undirected graph G = (V, E) is said to dominate all its adjacent vertices and itself. A subset D of V is a dominating set in G if every vertex in G is dominated by a vertex in D, and is a minimum dominating set in G if no other dominating set in G has fewer vertices than D. The domination number of G is the cardinality of a minimum dominating set in G.The problem of determining, for a given positive integer k and an undirected graph G, whether G has a dominating set D in G satisfying ¦D¦ ≤ k, is a well-known NP-complete problem. Cockayne have presented a linear time algorithm for finding a minimum dominating set in a tree. In this paper, we will present a linear time algorithm for finding a minimum dominating set in a series-parallel graph.     

Distance paired domination numbers of graphs

In this paper, we study a generalization of the paired domination number. Let G=(V,E) be a graph without an isolated vertex. A set D⊆V(G) is a k-distance paired dominating set of G if D is a k-distance dominating set of G and the induced subgraph 〈D〉 has a perfect matching. The k-distance paired domination number is the cardinality of a smallest k-distance paired dominating set of G. We investigate properties of the k-distance paired domination number of a graph. We also give an upper bound and a lower bound on the k-distance paired domination number of a non-trivial tree T in terms of the size of T and the number of leaves in T and we also characterize the extremal trees.     

Locating and total dominating sets in trees

A set S of vertices in a graph G=(V,E) is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of V is adjacent to a vertex in S. We consider total dominating sets of minimum cardinality which have the additional property that distinct vertices of V are totally dominated by distinct subsets of the total dominating set.     

Connected Resolvability of Graphs

For an ordered set W = {w ₁, w ₂,..., w _k} of vertices and a vertex v in a connected graph G, the representation of v with respect to W is the k-vector r(v|W) = (d(v, w ₁), d(v, w ₂),... d(v, w _k)), where d(x, y) represents the distance between the vertices x and y. The set W is a resolving set for G if distinct vertices of G have distinct representations with respect to W. A resolving set for G containing a minimum number of vertices is a basis for G. The dimension dim(G) is the number of vertices in a basis for G. A resolving set W of G is connected if the subgraph 〈W〉 induced by W is a nontrivial connected subgraph of G. The minimum cardinality of a connected resolving set in a graph G is its connected resolving number cr(G). Thus 1 ≤ dim(G) ≤ cr(G) ≤ n?1 for every connected graph G of order n ≥ 3. The connected resolving numbers of some well-known graphs are determined. It is shown that if G is a connected graph of order n ≥ 3, then cr(G) = n?1 if and only if G = K _n or G = K _1,n?1. It is also shown that for positive integers a, b with a ≤ b, there exists a connected graph G with dim(G) = a and cr(G) = b if and only if $\left( {a,b} \right) \notin \left\{ {\left( {1,k} \right):k = 1\;{\text{or}}\;k \geqslant 3} \right\}$ Several other realization results are present. The connected resolving numbers of the Cartesian products G × K ₂ for connected graphs G are studied.     

Efficient algorithms for Roman domination on some classes of graphs

A Roman dominating function of a graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2} such that every vertex x with f(x)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex y with f(y)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is defined to be f(V)=∑_x∈Vf(x), and the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on a graph G is called the Roman domination number of G. In this paper we first answer an open question mentioned in [E.J. Cockayne, P.A. Dreyer Jr., S.M. Hedetniemi, S.T. Hedetniemi, Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004) 11-22] by showing that the Roman domination number of an interval graph can be computed in linear time. We then show that the Roman domination number of a cograph (and a graph with bounded cliquewidth) can be computed in linear time. As a by-product, we give a characterization of Roman cographs. It leads to a linear-time algorithm for recognizing Roman cographs. Finally, we show that there are polynomial-time algorithms for computing the Roman domination numbers of -free graphs and graphs with a d-octopus.     

On the Structure of Graphs with Bounded Asteroidal Number

 A set A⊆V of the vertices of a graph G=(V,E) is an asteroidal set if for each vertex a∈A, the set A\{a} is contained in one component of G−N[a]. The maximum cardinality of an asteroidal set of G, denoted by an (G), is said to be the asteroidal number of G. We investigate structural properties of graphs of bounded asteroidal number. For every k≥1, an (G)≤k if and only if an (H)≤k for every minimal triangulation H of G. A dominating target is a set D of vertices such that D∪S is a dominating set of G for every set S such that G[D∪S] is connected. We show that every graph G has a dominating target with at most an (G) vertices. Finally, a connected graph G has a spanning tree T such that d _T (x,y)−d _G (x,y)≤3·|D|−1 for every pair x,y of vertices and every dominating target D of G. Received: July 3, 1998 Final version received: August 10, 1999     

Choosability of graphs with infinite sets of forbidden differences

The notion of the list-T-coloring is a common generalization of the T-coloring and the list-coloring. Given a set of non-negative integers T, a graph G and a list-assignment L, the graph G is said to be T-colorable from the list-assignment L if there exists a coloring c such that the color c(v) of each vertex v is contained in its list L(v) and |c(u)-c(v)|∉T for any two adjacent vertices u and v. The T-choice number of a graph G is the minimum integer k such that G is T-colorable for any list-assignment L which assigns each vertex of G a list of at least k colors.We focus on list-T-colorings with infinite sets T. In particular, we show that for any fixed set T of integers, all graphs have finite T-choice number if and only if the T-choice number of K₂ is finite. For the case when the T-choice number of K₂ is finite, two upper bounds on the T-choice number of a graph G are provided: one being polynomial in the maximum degree of the graph G, and the other being polynomial in the T-choice number of K₂.     

Blockers and transversals in some subclasses of bipartite graphs: When caterpillars are dancing on a grid

Given an undirected graph G=(V,E) with matching number ν(G), a d-blocker is a subset of edges B such that ν((V,E?B))≤ν(G)−d and a d-transversal T is a subset of edges such that every maximum matching M has |M∩T|≥d. While the associated decision problem is NP-complete in bipartite graphs we show how to construct efficiently minimum d-transversals and minimum d-blockers in the special cases where G is a grid graph or a tree.     

Sur les graphes 2-reconstructibles

Let k be an integer (k?1) and G=(V,E) a graph with more than k vertices, a graph G′=(V,E′) is a k-reconstruction of G if, for any subset W of V with k elements, the subgraphs G(W) and G′(W) induced by W are isomorphic. The graph G is k-reconstructible when each k-reconstruction of G is isomorphic to G. Lopez (Z. Math. Logik Grundlag. Math. 24 (1978) 303–317) proved that any graph is 6-reconstructible. For k=3,4 and 5, the k-reconstructible graphs were studied in Boudabbous and Lopez (Eur. J. Combin. 23 (2002) 507–522; C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. I 329 (1999) 845–848). In this Note, we introduce a permutations group allowing for the interpretation of the 2-reconstructibility and we characterize the graphs which are embedded in a 2-reconstructible graph. To cite this article: A. Boussairi, A. Chaichaa, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 337 (2003).     

The k-Dominating Graph

Given a graph G, the k-dominating graph of G, D _k (G), is defined to be the graph whose vertices correspond to the dominating sets of G that have cardinality at most k. Two vertices in D _k (G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding dominating sets of G differ by either adding or deleting a single vertex. The graph D _k (G) aids in studying the reconfiguration problem for dominating sets. In particular, one dominating set can be reconfigured to another by a sequence of single vertex additions and deletions, such that the intermediate set of vertices at each step is a dominating set if and only if they are in the same connected component of D _k (G). In this paper we give conditions that ensure D _k (G) is connected.     

Connected domination of regular graphs

A dominating setD of a graph G is a subset of V(G) such that for every vertex v∈V(G), either v∈D or there exists a vertex u∈D that is adjacent to v in G. Dominating sets of small cardinality are of interest. A connected dominating setC of a graph G is a dominating set of G such that the subgraph induced by the vertices of C in G is connected. A weakly-connected dominating setW of a graph G is a dominating set of G such that the subgraph consisting of V(G) and all edges incident with vertices in W is connected. In this paper we present several algorithms for finding small connected dominating sets and small weakly-connected dominating sets of regular graphs. We analyse the average-case performance of these heuristics on random regular graphs using differential equations, thus giving upper bounds on the size of a smallest connected dominating set and the size of a smallest weakly-connected dominating set of random regular graphs.     

Minimum monopoly in regular and tree graphs

In this paper we consider a graph optimization problem called minimum monopoly problem, in which it is required to find a minimum cardinality set S⊆V, such that, for each u∈V, |N[u]∩S|?|N[u]|/2 in a given graph G=(V,E). We show that this optimization problem does not have a polynomial-time approximation scheme for k-regular graphs (k?5), unless P=NP. We show this by establishing two L-reductions (an approximation preserving reduction) from minimum dominating set problem for k-regular graphs to minimum monopoly problem for 2k-regular graphs and to minimum monopoly problem for (2k-1)-regular graphs, where k?3. We also show that, for tree graphs, a minimum monopoly set can be computed in linear time.     

Rooted directed path graphs are leaf powers

Leaf powers are a graph class which has been introduced to model the problem of reconstructing phylogenetic trees. A graph G=(V,E) is called k-leaf power if it admits a k-leaf root, i.e., a tree T with leaves V such that uv is an edge in G if and only if the distance between u and v in T is at most k. Moroever, a graph is simply called leaf power if it is a k-leaf power for some k∈N. This paper characterizes leaf powers in terms of their relation to several other known graph classes. It also addresses the problem of deciding whether a given graph is a k-leaf power.We show that the class of leaf powers coincides with fixed tolerance NeST graphs, a well-known graph class with absolutely different motivations. After this, we provide the largest currently known proper subclass of leaf powers, i.e, the class of rooted directed path graphs.Subsequently, we study the leaf rank problem, the algorithmic challenge of determining the minimum k for which a given graph is a k-leaf power. Firstly, we give a lower bound on the leaf rank of a graph in terms of the complexity of its separators. Secondly, we use this measure to show that the leaf rank is unbounded on both the class of ptolemaic and the class of unit interval graphs. Finally, we provide efficient algorithms to compute 2|V|-leaf roots for given ptolemaic or (unit) interval graphs G=(V,E).     

A note on acyclic domination number in graphs of diameter two

A subset S of the vertex set of a graph G is called acyclic if the subgraph it induces in G contains no cycles. S is called an acyclic dominating set of G if it is both acyclic and dominating. The minimum cardinality of an acyclic dominating set, denoted by γ_a(G), is called the acyclic domination number of G. Hedetniemi et al. [Acyclic domination, Discrete Math. 222 (2000) 151-165] introduced the concept of acyclic domination and posed the following open problem: if δ(G) is the minimum degree of G, is γ_a(G)?δ(G) for any graph whose diameter is two? In this paper, we provide a negative answer to this question by showing that for any positive k, there is a graph G with diameter two such that γ_a(G)-δ(G)?k.     

On matching and total domination in graphs

A set M of edges of a graph G is a matching if no two edges in M are incident to the same vertex. A set S of vertices in G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The matching number is the maximum cardinality of a matching of G, while the total domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between the matching and total domination number of a graph. We observe that the total domination number of every claw-free graph with minimum degree at least three is bounded above by its matching number, and we show that every k-regular graph with k?3 has total domination number at most its matching number. In general, we show that no minimum degree is sufficient to guarantee that the matching number and total domination number are comparable.     

A note on Roman domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a simple graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if for any vertex u∈V-S, there exists a vertex v∈S such that uv∈E. The domination number of G, γ(G), equals the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. A Roman dominating function on graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2} satisfying the condition that every vertex v for which f(v)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u for which f(u)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(V)=∑_v∈Vf(v). The Roman domination number of a graph G, denoted by γ_R(G), equals the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. In this paper, for any integer k(2?k?γ(G)), we give a characterization of graphs for which γ_R(G)=γ(G)+k, which settles an open problem in [E.J. Cockayne, P.M. Dreyer Jr, S.M. Hedetniemi et al. On Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004) 11-22].     

On restricted domination in graphs

The k-restricted domination number of a graph G is the minimum number d _k such that for any subset U of k vertices of G, there is a dominating set in G including U and having at most d _k vertices. Some new upper bounds in terms of order and degrees for this number are found.      

Total restrained domination numbers of trees

For a given connected graph G=(V,E), a set D_tr⊆V(G) is a total restrained dominating set if it is dominating and both 〈D_tr〉 and 〈V(G)-D_tr〉 do not contain isolate vertices. The cardinality of the minimum total restrained dominating set in G is the total restrained domination number and is denoted by γ_tr(G). In this paper we characterize the trees with equal total and total restrained dominating numbers and give a lower bound on the total restrained dominating number of a tree T in terms of its order and the number of leaves of T.