Chemical transformations of a SiO2-supported [Fe5RhC(CO)16]− cluster and catalysis of propylene hydroformylation

Chemical transformations of SiO₂-supported [Fe₅RhC(CO)₁₆]^– and [Fe₄RhC(CO)₁₄]^– clusters in Ar, CO, and synthesis gas are studied by IR spectroscopy, Mössbauer spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. It is shown that partial transformation of the [Fe₅RhC(CO)₁₆]^– cluster to the [Fe₄RhC(CO)₁₄]^– cluster occurs immediately after its deposition on the substrate surface with the simultaneous formation of Fe²⁺ ions. The complete conversion of the supported [Fe₅RhC(CO)₁₆]^– cluster to [Fe₄RhC(CO)₁₄]^– is observed at 323 K in the synthesis gas. At 373 to 423 K [Fe₅RhC(CO)₁₆]^– transforms into a mixture of Fe₄Rh₂C(CO)₁₆, [Fe₄RhC(CO)₁₄]^–, and [Fe₅₃Rh₃C(CO)₁₅]^– clusters. In the 523 to 623 K range, the supported [Fe₅RhC(CO)₁₆]^– cluster decarbonylates completely to form bimetallic species Å 5 Å in size. Silica-supported FeRh clusters are active in propylene hydroformylation at 423 to 473 K and form a mixture of butyl alcohols and butyraldehydes.Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 4, pp. 632–641, April, 1995.This work was financially supported by the Krasnoyarsk Region Scince Foundation (Grant No. 1F0020).     

Binuclear Iron(I) Complex Containing Bridging Phenanthrene‐4,5‐dithiolate Ligand: Preparation,Spectroscopy, Crystal Structure,and Electrochemistry

A diiron hexacarbonyl complex containing bridging phenanthrene‐4,5‐dithiolate ligand is prepared by oxidative addition of Phenanthro[4,5‐cde][1,2]dithiin to Fe₂(CO)₉. The complex is investigated as a model for the active site of the [Fe–Fe] hydrogenase enzyme. The compound, [(μ‐PNT)Fe₂(CO)₆]; (PNT = phenanthrene‐4,5‐dithiolate), was characterized by spectroscopic methods (IR, UV/Vis and NMR) and X‐ray crystallography. The IR and proton NMR spectra of [(μ‐PNT)Fe₂(CO)₆] ( 4 ) are in agreement with a PNT ligand attached to a Fe₂(CO)₆ core. The infrared spectrum of 4 recorded in dichloromethane contains three peaks at 2001, 2040, and 2075 cm^–1 corresponding to the stretching frequency of terminal metal carbonyls. X‐ray crystallographic study unequivocally confirms the structure of the complex having a butterfly shape with an Fe–Fe bond length of 2.5365 Å close to that of the enzyme (2.6 Å). Electrochemical properties of [(μ‐PNT)Fe₂(CO)₆] have been investigated by cyclic voltammetry. The cyclic voltammogram of [(μ‐PNT)Fe₂(CO)₆] recorded in acetonitrile contains one quasi‐irreversible reduction (E_1/2 = –0.84 V vs. Ag/AgCl, I_pc/I_pa = 0.6, ΔE_p = 131 V at 0.1 V · s^–1) and one irreversible oxidation (E_pa = 0.86 V vs. Ag/AgCl). The redox of [(μ‐PNT)Fe₂(CO)₆] at E_1/2 = –0.84 V can be assigned to the one‐electron transfer processes; [Fe^I–Fe^I] → [Fe^I–Fe⁰] and [Fe^I–Fe⁰] → [Fe^I–Fe^I].     

Mössbauer study of some Fe-containing M6 and M5 clusters

Isomer shift (δ) and quadrupole splitting (Δ) parameters have been assigned to the iron sites in [FeRh₅(CO)₁₆]⁻, trans- and cis-[Fe₂Rh₄(CO)₁₆]²⁻, [Fe₃-Rh₃(CO)₁₇]³⁻, [FeRh₄(CO)₁₅]²⁻, [Fe₃Pt₃(CO)₁₅]²⁻ and [Fe₄M(CO)₁₆]²⁻ (M = Pd or Pt) from ⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer spectra recorded at 78 K. The data for the closo compounds [FeRh₅(CO)₁₆]⁻ and [Fe₂Rh₄(CO)₁₆]²⁻ are compared with those for [Fe₆(CO)₁₆C]²⁻. In [Fe₃Rh₃(CO)₁₇]³⁻, the three major Fe sites were identified. For both [Fe₄M(CO)₁₆]²⁻ compounds two isomers were shown to be present in the solid state.     

Density functional investigation and bonding analysis of pentacoordinated iron complexes with mixed cyano and carbonyl ligands

The equilibrium structures and vibrational frequencies of the iron complexes [Fe⁰(CN)_n(CO)_5?n]^n? and [Fe^II(CN)_n(CO)_5?n]^2?n (n = 0–5) have been calculated at the BP86 level of theory. The Fe⁰ complexes adopt trigonal bipyramidal structures with the cyano ligands occupying the axial positions, whereas corresponding Fe²⁺ complexes adopt square pyramidal structures with the cyano ligands in the equatorial positions. The calculated geometries and vibrational frequencies of the mixed iron Fe⁰ carbonyl cyanide complexes are in a very good agreement with the available experimental data. The nature of the Fe? CN and Fe? CO bonds has been analyzed with both charge decomposition and energy partitioning analysis. The results of energy partitioning analysis of the Fe? CO bonds shows that the binding interactions in Fe⁰ complexes have 50–55% electrostatic and 45–50% covalent character, whereas in Fe²⁺ 45–50% electrostatic and 50–55% covalent character. There is a significant contribution of the π‐ orbital interaction to the Fe? CO covalent bonding which increases as the number of the cyano groups increases, and the complexes become more negatively charged. This contribution decreases in going from Fe⁰ to Fe²⁺ complexes. Also, this contribution correlates very well with the C? O stretching frequencies. The Fe? CN bonds have much less π‐character (12–30%) than the Fe? CO bonds. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2010     

Ligand exchange processes in some iron-sulphur-carbonyl and -nitrosyl complexes

The complex [Fe₂(SMe)₂(CO)₆] undergoes stepwise exchange with Et₂S₂ to yield successively [Fe₂(SMe)(SEt)(CO)₆] and [Fe₂(SEt)₂(CO)₆]. Carbonyl complexes [Fe₂(SR)₂(CO)₆] are efficiently converted to the nitrosyls [Fe₂(SR)₂(NO)₄] by the action either of NO gas or of methanolic sodium nitrite: the analogous species [Fe₂S₂(CO)₆], [Fe₂S₂(CO)₆]^2?, and [Fe₃S₂(CO)₉] all, with methanolic nitrite, yield [Fe₄S₃(NO)₇]^?. This anion, [Fe₄S₃(NO)₇]^?, reacts with sulphur to give the cubane-like [Fe₄S₄(NO)₄]: the synthesis of its selenium analogue, [Fe₄Se₃(NO)₇]^? is described. The complexes [Fe₂(SR)₂(NO)₄] (R = Me, Et, Prⁿ, Prⁱ, Bu^t, PhCH₂) all consist of two isomers in solution, presumed to have structures of C_2h and C_2v, symmetry: activation parameters for the C_2h?C_2v reaction are reported.     

Recent studies on chemistry of novel μ-CO-containing butterfly Fe/E (E=S,Se,Te) cluster salts

This article describes recent developments in chemical study on a series of butterfly-shaped μ-CO-containing Fe/E (E = S, Se, Te) cluster salts. These salts include eleven novel cluster anions, which are the single butterfly one μ-CO-containing [(μ-RE)(μ-CO)Fe2(CO)6]- (A), the double butterfly two μ-CO-containing {[(μ-CO)Fe2(CO)6]2(μ-EZE-μ)}2- (B, E = S; C, E = Se), the triple butterfly three μ-CO- containing {[(μ-CO)Fe2(CO)6]3[(μ-SCH2CH2)3N]}3- (D), {[(μ-CO)Fe2(CO)6]3[1,3,5-(μ-SCH2)3C6H3]}3- (E), {[(μ- CO)...     

Bestimmung von Gleichgewichtskonstanten für Ligandenaustauschreaktionen von [TcNX4]− (X = Cl,Br) mit Hilfe der EPR

Polynuclear Complexes with Fe? As, Fe? Sb, and Fe? Bi Frameworks The anionic iron clusters Fe₃(CO)₁₁^2? and Fe₄(CO)₁₃^2? were reacted with compounds EX₃ and with organic derivatives REX₂ and R₂EX of the elements arsenic, antimony, and bismuth. Commonly redox and cluster degradation reactions were observed. The new complexes [(CO)₄Fe? AsMe₂? Fe(CO)₄]^?, [HFe₃(CO)₉(mu;₃-SbBu^t)]^?, [Fe₃(CO)₁₀ (mu;₃-Sb)]^?, and [Fe₃(CO)₁₀(mu;₃-Bi)]^? were formed and isolated as their PPN salts. The Fe? As? Fe complex was identified by a structure determination, the other complexes were identified by their spectra.     

Replacement of Fe atoms by Ru in a carbidocarbonyl cluster [Fe<Subscript>6</Subscript>C(CO)<Subscript>16</Subscript>]<Superscript>2−</Superscript>. Structures of reaction products

The reaction of the carbidocarbonyl cluster [Fe₆C(CO)₁₆]²⁻ with ruthenium(IV) hydroxochloride Ru(OH)Cl₃ was studied. At 90–100 °C, the reaction gave products of replacement of Fe atoms by Ru in the [Fe₆C(CO)₁₆]²⁻ cluster along with degradation products. Treatment of the replacement products with FeCl₃ afforded the [Fe_2.96Ru_3.04C(CO)₁₇] compound (1), which was characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis. The crystals of cluster 1 are composed of two types of octahedral molecules (1a and 1b) in a ratio of 2 : 1. Molecules 1a are in general positions, and molecules 1b are located on twofold axes. In both molecules, the Fe and Ru atoms are disordered over four of six positions. __________ Published in Russian in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 8, pp. 1761–1766, August, 2005.     

Bimetallic Fe–Cu Carbido Carbonyl Clusters Obtained from the Reactions of [Fe<Subscript>4</Subscript>C(CO)<Subscript>12</Subscript>{Cu(MeCN)}<Subscript>2</Subscript>] with N-Donor Ligands

The reaction of [Fe₄C(CO)₁₂{Cu(MeCN)}₂] (1) with 3 equivalents of L–L (phen or Me₂phen) affords [Cu(L–L)₂][Fe₄C(CO)₁₂{Cu(L–L)}] (L–L = phen, 2; Me₂phen, 3) in good yields. These are protonated by strong acids resulting in [HFe₄C(CO)₁₂{Cu(L–L)}] (L–L = phen, 4; Me₂phen, 5). The reaction may be reversed with bases, resulting in the quaternary ammonium salts [NR₄][Fe₄C(CO)₁₂{Cu(phen)}] (6). 4 and 5 react with a slight excess of L–L resulting in the elimination of copper in the form of [Cu(L–L)₂]⁺ and formation of the previously reported [HFe₄C(CO)₁₂]^? homometallic cluster. Conversely, the reaction of 1 with a monodentate N-ligand such as quinoline, even if used in large excess, results in the substitution product [Fe₄C(CO)₁₂{Cu(quinoline)}₂] (8), which is then transformed into [Cu(Me₂phen)₂] [Fe₄C(CO)₁₂{Cu(quinoline)}] (9) after reaction with Me₂phen. By using the anionic cluster [Fe₅C(CO)₁₄{Cu(MeCN)}]^? instead of the neutral 1, only substitution has been observed by using both phen and quinoline, resulting in [Fe₅C(CO)₁₄{Cu(phen)}]^? (10) and [Fe₅C(CO)₁₄{Cu(quinoline)}]^? (11), respectively. Finally, the reaction of 1 with [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(N₄C-C₆H₄-CN)]Cl affords crystals of [Fe₄C(CO)₁₂Cu₂Cl{Ru(tpy)(bpy)(N₄C-C₆H₄-CN)}] (12). All compounds 2-12 have been characterized by a combination of spectroscopic (IR, NMR) and crystallographic methods. All these clusters may be viewed as composed by a butterfly [Fe₄C(CO)₁₂]^2? core bonded to Cu(I) fragments and/or H⁺ ions.     

Formation of Unusual Complexes from the Reaction of [C(NMe2)3][(CO)4Fe{C(O)NMe2}] with InMe3; Crystal Structures of [C(NMe2)3]3[Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CO){μ‐InFe(CO)4(μ‐O2CNMe2)InFe(CO)4}] and [C(NMe2)3]2[{(CO)4Fe}2In(O2CNMe2)]·THF

The carbamoyl complex [C(NMe₂)₃][(CO)₄Fe{C(O)NMe₂}] ( 1 ) reacts with InMe₃ under loss of the methyl groups to produce a variety of compounds from which only the anionic cluster complexes [C(NMe₂)₃]₃[Fe₂(CO)₆(μ‐CO){μ‐InFe(CO)₄(μ‐O₂CNMe₂)InFe(CO)₄}] ([C N ₃]₃[ 2 ]) and [C(NMe₂)₃]₂[{(CO)₄Fe}₂In(O₂CNMe₂)]·THF ([C N ₃]₂[ 3 ]·THF) could be crystallized and characterized by X‐ray analyses. The anion [ 2 ]^3? has a Fe₂(CO)₉‐like structure and both anions contain the carbaminato ligand either in a bridging or in a chelating function.     

Electrocatalysis of hydrogen evolution by synthetic diiron units using weak acids as the proton source: Pathways of doubtful relevance to enzymic catalysis by the diiron subsite of [FeFe] hydrogenase

IR spectroelectrochemical studies of bis(thiolate) and dithiolate-bridged diiron carbonyl compounds, [Fe₂(μ-SR)₂(CO)₆], show that the primary reduction process results in rapid chemical reaction, leading to two-electron reduced products. When the reaction is conducted under an inert atmosphere, the major product is [Fe₂(μ-SR)(μ-CO)(CO)₆]¹⁻, where in the case of dithiolate-bridged neutral compounds the product has one bridging and one non-bound sulfur atom. This product is formed in near-quantitative yield for solutions saturated with CO. Reduction of [Fe₂(μ-SR)(μ-CO)(CO)₆]¹⁻ occurs at potentials near −2.0 V vs. SCE to give a range of products including [Fe(CO)₄]²⁻. Reduction of thiolate-bridged diiron compounds at mild potentials in the presence of CH₃COOH leads to formation of [Fe₂(μ-SR)(μ-CO)(CO)₆]¹⁻ and this is accompanied by an acid-base reaction with the dissociated thiolate. The reaction is largely reversible with recovery of ca. 90% of the starting diiron compound and CH₃COOH. In the presence of acid, reduction of [Fe₂(μ-SR)₂(CO)₆] proceeds without generation of observable concentrations of the structurally related one-electron reduced compound. Electrocatalytic proton reduction is achieved when the potential is stepped sufficiently negative to reduce [Fe₂(μ-SR)(μ-CO)(CO)₆]¹⁻, an observation in keeping with the cyclic voltammetry of the system. Since the catalytic species involved in the weak-acid reactions is structurally distinct from the starting material, and the diiron subsite of the hydrogenase H-cluster, these experiments are of dubious relevance to the biological system.     

Darstellung von trans-[Pt(ox)2X2]2− (X = Cl,Br, I,SCN, OH) durch oxydative Addition an [Pt(ox)2]2− in organischen Solventien

Preparation of trans-[Pt(ox)₂X₂]^2? (X = Cl, Br, I, SCN, OH) by Oxidative Addition to [Pt(ox)₂]^2? in Organic Solvents After extraction of [Pt(ox)₂]^2? with long-chain alkyl-ammonium ions into organic solvents the new Pt^IV complexes trans-[Pt(ox)₂X₂]^2?, X = Cl, Br, I, SCN, OH, are formed directly by oxidative addition. In nonpolar solvents the bulky organic cations prevent the formation of compounds with columnar structure which by partial oxidation in aqueous solution are formed immediately. The IR and Ra spectra of the stable anhydrous (TBA) salts are assigned according to point group D_2h. A characteristical dependence of the C?O, C? O, and Pt? O stretching modes in response to the oxidation state of the central ion is observed. There is vibrational fine structure in the absorption spectrum of [Pt(ox)₂]^2? measured at 10 K with long progressions by coupling of d—d transitions with v_s(Pt? O) and v_s(C?O). The characteristical feature in the UV/VIS spectra of the Pt^IV complexes is caused by intensive π(O, X) ← e_g(Pt) CT transitions.     

Gas-phase chemistry of electron deficient organometallic anions: the reactions of [Cr(CO)3]− ˙ and [Cr(CO)4]− ˙ with aldehydes,ketones, esters and ethers

Reactions in the gas phase of the 13- and 15-electron radical anions [Cr(CO)₃]^{? ˙} and [Cr(CO)₄]^{? ˙} with a series of 27 aldehydes, ketones, esters and ethers have been examined. Sequential alkane eliminations and metal-bonded CO ligand displacements were the principal reactions identified for the RCHO/[Cr(CO)₃]^{? ˙} systems with the latter reaction also common to the RCHO/[Cr(CO)₄]^{? ˙} systems. While [Cr(CO)₄]^{? ˙} was generally unreactive towards ketones R · R'CO, the principal products identified for [Cr(CO)₃]^{? ˙}/ketone reactions were the metal-decarbonylated species, respectively [R · R'CO · Cr(CO)_x]^{? ˙} with x = 0–3, and [R · (R' - H₂)CO · Cr(CO)₂]^{? ˙}. The reaction of [Cr(CO)₃]^{? ˙} with esters RCOOR' proceeds via metal insertion into the alkoxy C? O bond to give end products of the type [R'O · Cr · R(CO)₂]^? and [R'O? Cr(CO)₃]^? while the sole ionic products of dialkyl ether/[Cr(CO)₃]^{? ˙} reactions were identified as the alkoxytricarbonylchromium species [RO · Cr(CO)₃]^?.     

Single-Source Precursors for the Chemical Vapor Deposition of Iron Germanides

Binary iron-germanium phases are promising materials in magnetoelectric, spintronic or data storage applications due to their unique magnetic properties. Previous protocols for preparation of Fe_xGe_y thin films and nanostructures typically involve harsh conditions and are challenging in terms of phase composition and homogeneity. Herein, we report the first example of single source chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of Fe_xGe_y films. The appreciable volatility of [Ge[Fe₂(CO)₈]₂], [Cl₂GeFe(CO)₄]₂ and ^Me₂iPr₂NHC ⋅ GeCl₂ ⋅ Fe(CO)₄ allowed for their application as precursors under standard CVD conditions (^Me₂iPr₂NHC=1,3-diisopropoyl-4,5-dimethylimidazol-2-ylidene). The thermal decomposition products of the precursors were characterized by TGA and powder XRD. Deposition experiments in a cold-wall CVD reactor resulted in dense films of Fe_xGe_y. During the optimization of synthetic conditions for precursor preparation the new iron-germanium cluster Cl₂Ge[Fe₂(CO)₈]Ge[Fe₂(CO)₈] was obtained in experiments with a higher stoichiometric ratio of GeCl₂ ⋅ 1,4-dioxane vs. Fe₂(CO)₉.     

Boron Cluster Anions [BnHn]2– (n = 10, 12) in Reactions of Iron(II) and Iron(III) Complexation with 2, 2′‐Bipyridyl and 1, 10‐Phenanthroline

Complexation of Fe^II and Fe^III with azaheterocyclic ligands L (L = phen or bipy) were studied in the presence and in the absence of boron cluster anions [B_nH_n]^2– (n = 10, 12). The reactions were carried out in air at room temperature in organic solvents and/or water. In all the solvents used, well known [FeL₃]An (An = 2Cl^– or SO₄^2–) ferrous complexes were formed from Fe^II salts. Composition of ferric complexes with L ligands depends on the nature of solvent: either dinuclear oxo‐iron(III) chlorides [L₂ClFe^III–O–Fe^IIIL₂Cl]Cl₂ or ferric ferrates(III) [Fe^IIIL₂Cl₂][Fe^IIICl₄], or [Fe^IIIL₂Cl₂][Fe^IIICl₄L] were isolated from Fe^III salts. Introduction of the closo‐borate anions to a Fe³⁺(or Fe²⁺)/L/solv. mixture stabilizes ferrous cationic complexes [FeL₃]²⁺ in all the solvents used: only ferrous [FeL₃][B_nH_n] (n = 10, 12) complexes were isolated from all the reaction mixtures in the presence of boron cluster anions.     

Solvent‐Free Ball‐Milling Subcomponent Synthesis of Metallosupramolecular Complexes

Subcomponent self‐assembly from components A , B , C , D , and Fe²⁺ under solvent‐free conditions by self‐sorting leads to the construction of three structurally different metallosupramolecular iron(II) complexes. Under carefully selected ball‐milling conditions, tetranuclear [Fe₄( AD ₂)₆]^4? 22‐component cage 1 , dinuclear [Fe₂( BD ₂)₃]^2? 11‐component helicate 2 , and 5‐component mononuclear [Fe( CD ₃)]²⁺ complex 3 were prepared simultaneously in a one‐pot reaction from 38 components. Through subcomponent substitution reaction by adding subcomponent B , the [Fe₄( AD ₂)₆]^4? cage converts quantitatively to the [Fe₂( BD ₂)₃]^2? helicate, which, in turn, upon addition of subcomponent C , transforms to [Fe( CD ₃)]²⁺, following the hierarchical preference based on the thermodynamic stability of the complexes.     

Heteronukleare Komplexverbindungen mit Metall—Metall-Bindungen. IX [1]. Amin-kupfer(I)-carbonylmetallate mit Cobalt,Eisen oder Mangan

Heteronuclear Coordination Compounds with Metal—Metal Bonds. IX. Amine Copper(I) Carbonyl Metalates with Cobalt, Iron, or Manganese Colourless crystals of the carbonyl copper complex [(NH₃)₃(CO)Cu][Co(CO)₄] ( 1 a ) are formed in the reaction of [Cu(NH₃)₄]Cl and Na[Co(CO)₄] (T < ? 8°C, p_CO = 1 bar); above ?5°C and under N₂-atmosphere 1 a converts to [(NH₃)₂CuCo(CO)₄] ( C ), which serves as a starting material for the synthesis of new copper cobaltates: the amines N-amino piperidine, N,N-dimethyl ethylenediamine (dmed) and N-benzyl N,N′-dimethyl ethylenediamine (bn-dmed) replace NH₃ to form [(C₅H₁₀N? NH₂)₃CuCo(CO)₄] ( 1 b ), [(dmed)CuCo(CO)₄] ( 1 c ), [(bn-dmed)CuCo(CO)₄] ( 1 d ) the Cu? Co-bond remaining intact. [(NH₃)₂CuFe(CO)₃NO] ( 2 a ) is isosteric with C ; it is synthesized from [Cu(NH₃)₄]Cl and Na[Fe(CO)₃NO] in aqueous solution; 2 a reacts with N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl ethylenediamine (tmed) to form [(tmed)(NH₃)CuFe(CO)₃NO] ( 2b ). The [Mn(CO)₅]^? ion reacts with ammine copper ions to form the tetranuclear cluster [{(NH₃)CuMn(CO)₅}₂] ( 3 ). All new compounds have been investigated by X-ray structure analysis.     

Syntheses of the new trinuclear ions [Ru3(CO)11]2− and [Os3(CO)11]2−

Stoichiometric reduction of Os₃CO)₁₂ and Ru₃(CO)₁₂ with K and Ca, respectively; yields the two new cluster dianions [Os₃(CO)₁₁]^2? and [Ru₃(CO)₁₁]^2? which have been isolated and characterized. Temperature-dependent ¹³C NMR spectra for [Os₃(CO)₁₁]^2? and infrared spectra of [Os₃(CO)₁₁]^2? and [Ru₃(CO)₁₁]^2? suggest a similar structure for these dianions in which there is a single edge-bridging carbonyl.     

[Fe2(μsb‐CO)(CO)3(NO)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]: Synthese,Kristallstruktur und Koordinationsisomerie

[Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)]: Synthesis, X‐ray Crystal Structure and Isomerization Na[Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts with [NO][BF₄] at —60 °C in THF to the nitrosyl complex [Fe₂(CO)₆(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 2 ). The subsequent reaction of 2 with phosphanes (L) under mild conditions affords the complexes [Fe₂(CO)₅(NO)L(μ‐P^tBu₂)], L = PPh₃, ( 3a ); η‐dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂), ( 3b ). In this case the phosphane substitutes one carbonyl ligand at the iron tetracarbonyl fragment in 2 , which was confirmed by the X‐ray crystal structure analysis of 3a . In solution 3b loses one CO ligand very easily to give dppm as bridging ligand on the Fe‐Fe bond. The thus formed compound [Fe₂(CO)₄(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ) occurs in solution in different solvents and over a wide temperature range as a mixture of the two isomers [Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4a ) and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4b ). 4a was unambiguously characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis while 4b was confirmed both by NMR investigations in solution as well as by means of DFT calculations. Furthermore, the spontaneous reaction of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ) with NO at —60 °C in toluene yields a complicated mixture of products containing [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 6 ) as main product beside the isomers 4a and 4b occuring in very low yields.