Traceability of (values carried by) reference materials

 Traceability is a property of the result of a measurement. Since values carried by (reference) materials must also have been obtained, of necessity, by measurement, the definition of traceability also applies to reference materials. It is extremely helpful to give the traceability (of the origin) of a reference material a separate name, i.e. 'trackability'. An analysis of the function of values carried by reference materials, shows that they can fulfill different functions, depending on the intended use. One of the functions located outside the traceability chain – and hence not very relevant for establishing traceability – is evaluating the approximate size of the uncertainty of the measurement of an unknown sample by performing a similar measurement on a reference material, used as a 'simulated sample'. Another function is located inside the traceability chain, where the reference material is used as an added 'internal standard'. Then, the value carried by the reference material is essential for establishing the traceability of the measured value of an unknown sample. In the latter application, the reference material acts as an 'amount standard' (the certified value for amount is used). Received: 11 November 1999 / Accepted: 24 February 2000     

Achieving traceability in chemical measurement—a metrological approach to proficiency testing

ISO/IEC 17025 requires that testing laboratories establish the traceability of their measurements, preferably to the SI units of measurement. The responsibility for establishing traceability lies with each individual laboratory and must be achieved by following a metrological approach.The results of measurements made in such a way are traceable to the standards used in method validation and to the calibration standards used during the measurement process. If these standards are traceable to SI then the measurements will also be traceable to SI.Participation in appropriate proficiency studies (an ISO/IEC 17025 requirement) enables laboratories to demonstrate the comparability of their measurements. If the materials used for the studies have traceable assigned values, then proficiency testing also provides information about measurement accuracy and confirms, or otherwise, that appropriate traceability has been established. This paper will report on a new approach for the establishment of traceable assigned values for chemical testing proficiency studies. The work is conducted at a "fit for purpose" level of measurement uncertainty, with costs contained at a level similar to previous "consensus" based proficiency studies. By establishing traceable assigned values in a cost effective way, NARL aims to demonstrate the added value of the metrological approach to participant laboratories.     

Primary methods of measurement in chemical analysis

 Primary methods of measurement have a central function in metrology. They are an essential component in the realisation of the SI units and therefore are indispensable for establishing traceability of measurements of all kinds of physical quantities to the corresponding SI units. This is also true for chemical analysis. Gravimetry, titrimetry, coulometry, and isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) are evaluated with regard to their potential to be primary methods according to a general definition of primary methods recently given by the Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière (CCQM). Optical absorption spectrometry and methods based on colligative properties are also considered. A general scheme for establishing traceability of chemical measurements to the SI units using primary methods is discussed. Received: 17 April 1997 · Accepted: 9 August 1997     

The practical realization of the traceability of chemical measurements standards

Metrology is based on the concept of traceability. Traceability provides a means of relating measurement results to common standards thereby helping to ensure that measurements made in different laboratories are comparable. Good progress has been made in the application of metrological principles to chemical measurement, but there remains confusion about how you actually achieve traceability in a practical way. This paper elaborates on the meaning and application of much used phrases such as 'the value of a standard', 'stated references', 'unbroken chain of comparisons', and 'stated uncertainties'. It also explains how traceability can be established in a practical way for different types of stated references, namely pure substance reference materials, matrix reference materials, and primary and reference methods. Finally, traceability chains for some typical examples of chemical measurement are described.     

The practical realization of the traceability of chemical measurements standards

 Metrology is based on the concept of traceability. Traceability provides a means of relating measurement results to common standards thereby helping to ensure that measurements made in different laboratories are comparable. Good progress has been made in the application of metrological principles to chemical measurement, but there remains confusion about how you actually achieve traceability in a practical way.

This paper elaborates on the meaning and application of much used phrases such as 'the value of a standard', 'stated references', 'unbroken chain of comparisons', and 'stated uncertainties'. It also explains how traceability can be established in a practical way for different types of stated references, namely pure substance reference materials, matrix reference materials, and primary and reference methods. Finally, traceability chains for some typical examples of chemical measurement are described.

     

Comparability and recognition of chemical measurement results – an international goal

As a consequence of the globalisation of trade and industry and other human activities, reliability of and confidence in measurement results is increasingly required, also in the field of chemical analysis, so that measurements made in one country will be accepted in other countries without the necessity to repeat them. The prerequisite for confidence is comparability on the basis of known uncertainties which in turn are based on traceability to recognised references. Traceability structures for chemical measurements are required which, by providing calibration means traceable to national standards, allow uncertainty statements to be made at field level, thus establishing comparability. Such traceability structures are now being developed in all industrialised countries. To ensure international comparability, mutual recognition of the national activities in metrology in chemistry is required in addition. The Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) for national measurement standards and calibration certificates issued by national metrology institutes, which is currently under way within the framework of the Metre Convention, aimes at providing the necessary international confidence for all kinds of measurements. The field of chemical analysis is included in the international metrological infrastructure through the new Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM). Carefully selected key comparison measurements, which cover the most important areas where traceability is required, and which are carried out by national metrology institutes in cooperation with other national institutes entrusted with the provision of part of the national references for chemical measurements, form the basis for declarations of equivalence under the MRA. The results of the first key comparisons and studies carried out so far clearly show that the group of laboratories involved in the key comparisons is capable of establishing the international references (key comparison reference values) for chemical measurements with sufficient accuracy, also in complicated matrices.     

Traceability and uncertainty – A comparison of their application in chemical and physical measurement

 Establishment of the traceability and the evaluation of the uncertainty of the result of a measurement are essential in order to establish its comparability and fitness for purpose. There are both similarities and differences in the way that the concepts of traceability and uncertainty have been utilised in physical and chemical measurement. The International Committee of Weights and Measures (CIPM) have only in the last decade set up programmes in chemical metrology similar to those that have been in existence for physical metrology for over a century. However, analytical chemists over that same period have also developed techniques, based on the concepts of traceability and uncertainty, to ensure that their results are comparable and fit for purpose. This paper contrasts these developments in physical and chemical metrology and identifies areas where these two disciplines can learn from each other.     

The use of certified reference materials in the Romanian traceability scheme

 For ensuring the traceability and uniformity of measurement results, the main objectives of national metrology programmes in chemistry are to calibrate and verify measuring instruments, to evaluate the uncertainty of measurement results and to intercompare the analytical results, etc. The concept of traceability has developed recently in chemical measurements, thus, an attempt to implement the principles of metrological traceability especially by appropriateness calibration using composition certified reference materials (CRMs) is underlined. Interlaboratory comparisons are also a useful response to the need for comparable results. The paper presents some aspects and practices in the field of spectrometric measurement regarding the metrological quality of the traceability by calibrating the instruments using suitable and reliable CRMs. The uncertainty of results, as a measure of the reliability that can be placed on them, has been adequately described in different documents and, as a consequence, some examples of evaluating the measurement uncertainty are described. The relationship between uncertainty and traceability, as two fundamental concepts of metrology which are intimately linked, is underlined. Received: 12 November 1999 / Accepted: 10 December 1999     

Interlaboratory comparison for the determination of pesticide residues in Chinese cabbage

The results of and findings from an interlaboratory comparison among laboratories carrying out food testing of pesticide residues in the APEC (Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation) region are presented and discussed to show critical roles of chemical metrology infrastructure in establishing traceability of measurements and in supporting existing measurement capability in safety and quality of food trade. The study material, which was prepared and certified by Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), was freeze-dried Chinese cabbage powder fortified with two organophosphorous pesticides (diazinon and chlorpyrifos). Among 14 participants, 12 laboratories were accredited based on ISO/IEC17025 and one laboratory was under assessment for the accreditation at the time of this study. Though all participants demonstrated very good intra-day repeatability and inter-day intermediate precision, many of them showed a large bias from the certified values. It is suggested that in addition to the accreditation system, economies are encouraged to develop appropriate chemical metrology infrastructure, which could effectively support laboratories to assure measurement traceability to SI, for which NMIs could play significant roles through their metrological services recognized in Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) of the International Committee for Weights and Measures (Comité International des Poids et Mesures, CIPM).     

The key elements of traceability in chemical measurement: agreed or still under debate?

 Talking about "traceability" means talking about a "property of the result of a measurement", about "the value of a standard", about "stated references" and about an "unbroken chain of comparisons". It describes by which comparison, and to which other value, the result of a measurement has been obtained, i.e. is "traceable to". It is about the underlying structure of the measurement process of the result of a measurement and therefore about the authority of the result. Since values carried by (certified) reference materials have also been obtained by measurement, the definition of traceability equally applies. Traceability in the context of reference materials is also about the authority of the values carried by the (certified) reference materials and is, therefore, of key importance for the authority of the reference materials themselves. Hence, values of results of measurements constitute part of the traceability chain and their uncertainties are an intrinsic accompanying phenomenon. Uncertainties need a traceability chain against which they can be evaluated, and a traceability chain is an a priori requirement for evaluating the uncertainty budget of a measurement result. An attempt has been made to exemplify "traceability" chains in some types of chemical measurement and to identify the degree of international agreement on the key elements of "traceability". It is concluded that there is less than universal agreement on this issue. The debate should continue in order to arrive at the international understanding and agreement needed, as "traceability" is now being incorporated in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the International Laboratory Accreditation Co-operation (ILAC) and in other "guiding" or regulatory documents. It is also the reason why the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) has taken up the study of the concept in its core programme on Metrology in Chemistry, and why it sponsored the Workshop in Bratislava.

     

The traceability of analytical measurements

 Traceability to the System International (SI) is an important prerequisite for international comparability and uniformity of chemical measurements to ensure mutual recognition of the results. In theory, all measurements can be traced back to the seven base units of the SI. Although the traceability system works well for most physical measurements, in many analytical and in some spectrophotometric measurements this system is not satisfactory. This paper describes the particular and practical problems and the contribution of the Romanian National Institute of Metrology in this field. The paper discusses the following concepts: clearly defined targets in the form of requirement specification, knowledge of trueness and/or measurement uncertainty, and traceability through an unbroken chain of calibration to primary standards. Traceability and uncertainty being two concepts inherently coupled, two examples of assessment of the uncertainty of measurement results are given for two spectrophotometric methods currently used in chemical laboratories. Received: 17 July 1996 Accepted: 2 September 1996     

Meeting the measurement uncertainty and traceability requirements of ISO/IEC standard 17025 in chemical analysis

The new laboratory accreditation standard, ISO/IEC 17025, reflects current thinking on good measurement practice by requiring more explicit and more demanding attention to a number of activities. These include client interactions, method validation, traceability, and measurement uncertainty. Since the publication of the standard in 1999 there has been extensive debate about its interpretation. It is the author's view that if good quality practices are already in place and if the new requirements are introduced in a manner that is fit for purpose, the additional work required to comply with the new requirements can be expected to be modest. The paper argues that the rigour required in addressing the issues should be driven by customer requirements and the factors that need to be considered in this regard are discussed. The issues addressed include the benefits, interim arrangements, specifying the analytical requirement, establishing traceability, evaluating the uncertainty and reporting the information.     

A national traceability system for chemical measurements

Current developments in Germany for establishing a traceability system for chemical measurements are reported. The focus is on a dissemination mechanism which employs chemical calibration laboratories accredited within the framework of the German Calibration Service (DKD) and acting as "multipliers" between the national standards level and the user level by providing the user with calibration means which are traceable to the SI via national standards. At the national standards level, a network of high-level chemistry institutes coordinated by the national metrology institute, PTB, provides the primary references for chemical measurements.The use of the metrological dissemination system provided by the DKD also for chemical measurements is a logical extension of a traceability mechanism, successful for more than two decades in general metrology, to metrology in chemistry. In detail, traceability structures in clinical chemistry, electrochemistry, elemental analysis and gas analysis are described. This system has become an important part of the efforts made in Germany to support chemical laboratories in meeting the traceability requirements of the market and of legal regulations.     

How to achieve international comparability for chemical measurements

 It is the central aim of the current activities of metrology in chemistry to build confidence in the reliability of chemical measurement results so that they are accepted without costly duplication being necessary. An important prerequisite for such confidence is comparability based on traceability to recognised common references, ideally the SI units. Since metrology is organised within a national framework according to the national laws and regulations, a two-step procedure is to be followed to achieve international comparability for chemical measurements which is increasingly required as a result of the globalization of trade and economy: (1) establishment of national traceability structures for chemical measurements and (2) mutual recognition of the national traceability structures on the basis of equivalence criteria. The first step is at present being taken in many countries. Examples are presented for Germany. The second step has been initiated by the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) of the Meter Convention for national measurement standards and measurements and calibrations provided by national metrology institutes, which is based on international comparison measurements (key comparisons) carried out on the national standards level. Chemical analysis is included in this process through the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM).

     

Accreditation system for reference material producers and certified reference materials for iron and steel in Japan

  ISO 9000 series strictly requires traceability to national or international measurement standards. It is becoming more necessary to make clear the concept of traceability of measurement standards with respect to chemical composition and to accredit the reference material producers. In Japan, the accreditation system for reference material producers is considered to satisfy the requirement of ISO Guide 34, ISO 9000 series and ISO/IEC Guide 25, while the producer fulfills the concept of traceability of measurement standards. This paper describes the production of iron and steel reference materials in Japan relating to the international standardization of methods (written standards) and accreditation of reference material producers. Received: 11 October 1996 Accepted: 5 December 1996     

Metrological value of participating in interlaboratory comparisons

Quality of chemical measurement is a central issue nowadays with social, political and economic implications. This paper aims to describe how interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs) can contribute towards better quality of chemical measurements. The importance of ILCs as well as the different types and the requirements for proper organization of ILCs are explained. The international structure and organization of metrology is given, highlighting the activities related to chemical measurements. Particularly the use of ILCs in the service of metrology in chemistry is highlighted. A very important discussion concerning ILCs is how they can (or cannot) establish traceability. The view of the authors is that traceability cannot, as such, be established through ILCs. On the other hand, participation in ILCs can clearly support the claims for quality measurements, as ILCs are experimental and objective demonstrations of measurement capability.     

Traceability to units

On the grounds that clear and direct communication is required of us today, it is proposed that traceability be regarded as the ability to demonstrate that measurements are what they are purported to be and that traceability is thus to measurement units rather than reference values per se. It is suggested that such an approach may give greater flexibility in the establishment, maintenance and propagation of traceability, and that accreditation practices are becoming central to the practical establishment of traceability for chemical and biological measurement.