The Nitrogen‐Assisted Triphenylphosphine Displacement of 3‐Hydroxypyridine and 3‐Aminopyridine Ligands in Palladium(II) Complexes: Crystal Structures of [Pd(PPh3)Br]2{μ,η2‐C5H3N(OH)}2 and [Pd(PPh3)Br]2{μ,η2‐C5H3N(NH2)}2

Treatment of Pd(PPh₃₎₄ with 2‐bromo‐3‐hydroxypyridine [C₅H₃N(OH)Br] and 3‐amino‐2‐bromopyridine [C₅H₃N(NH₂)Br] in dichloromethane at ambient temperature cause the oxidative addition reaction to produce the palladium complex [Pd(PPh₃₎₂{η¹‐C₅H₃N(OH)}(Br)], 2 and [Pd(PPh₃₎₂{η¹‐C₅H₃N(NH₂)}(Br)], 3 , by substituting two triphenylphosphine ligands, respectively. In dichloromethane solution of complexes 2 and 3 at ambient temperature for 3 days, it undergo displacement of the triphenylphosphine ligand to form the dipalladium complexes [Pd(PPh₃)Br]₂{μ,η²‐C₅H₃N(OH)}₂, 4 and [Pd(PPh₃)Br]₂{μ,η²‐C₅H₃N(NH₂)}₂, 5 , in which the two 3‐hydroxypyridine and 3‐aminopyridine ligands coordinated through carbon to one metal center and bridging the other metal through nitrogen atom, respectively. Complexes 4 and 5 are characterized by X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

The Versatile Coordination Modes of Monophosphine‐o‐Carborane in the Formation of Iridium and Rhodium Complexes: Synthesis,Reactivity, and Characterization

Monophosphine‐o‐carborane has four competitive coordination modes when it coordinates to metal centers. To explore the structural transitions driven by these competitive coordination modes, a series of monophosphine‐o‐carborane Ir,Rh complexes were synthesized and characterized. [Cp*M(Cl)₂{1‐(PPh₂)‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₁}] (M=Ir ( 1 a ), Rh ( 1 b ); Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅), [Cp*Ir(H){7‐(PPh₂)‐7,8‐C₂B₉H₁₁}] ( 2 a ), and [1‐(PPh₂)‐3‐(η⁵‐Cp*)‐3,1,2‐MC₂B₉H₁₀] (M=Ir ( 3 a ), Rh ( 3 b )) can be all prepared directly by the reaction of 1‐(PPh₂)‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₁ with dimeric complexes [(Cp*MCl₂)₂] (M=Ir, Rh) under different conditions. Compound 3 b was treated with AgOTf (OTf=CF₃SO₃^?) to afford the tetranuclear metallacarborane [Ag₂(thf)₂(OTf)₂{1‐(PPh₂)‐3‐(η⁵‐Cp*)‐3,1,2‐RhC₂B₉H₁₀}₂] ( 4 b ). The arylphosphine group in 3 a and 3 b was functionalized by elemental sulfur (1 equiv) in the presence of Et₃N to afford [1‐{(S)PPh₂}‐3‐(η⁵‐Cp*)‐3,1,2‐MC₂B₉H₁₀] (M=Ir ( 5 a ), Rh ( 5 b )). Additionally, the 1‐(PPh₂)‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₁ ligand was functionalized by elemental sulfur (2 equiv) and then treated with [(Cp*IrCl₂)₂], thus resulting in two 16‐electron complexes [Cp*Ir(7‐{(S)PPh₂}‐8‐S‐7,8‐C₂B₉H₉)] ( 6 a ) and [Cp*Ir(7‐{(S)PPh₂}‐8‐S‐9‐OCH₃‐7,8‐C₂B₉H₉)] ( 7 a ). Compound 6 a further reacted with nBuPPh₂, thereby leading to 18‐electron complex [Cp*Ir(nBuPPh₂)(7‐{(S)PPh₂}‐8‐S‐7,8‐C₂B₉H₁₀)] ( 8 a ). The influences of other factors on structural transitions or the formation of targeted compounds, including reaction temperature and solvent, were also explored.     

The Nitrogen‐Assisted Triphenylphosphine Displacement of Methylpyridine Ligand in Palladium(II) Complex: Crystal Structures of [Pd(PPh3)2{η1‐C5H3N(CH3)}(Br)] and [Pd(PPh3)Br]2{μ,η2‐C5H3N(CH3)}2

Treatment of Pd(PPh₃)₄ with 2‐bromo‐4‐methylpyridine, C₅H₃N(CH₃)Br, in dichloromethane at ?20 °C causes the oxidative addition reaction to produce the palladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂ {η¹‐C₅H₃N(CH₃)}(Br)], 2 , by substituting two triphenylphosphine ligands. In a dichloromethane solution of complex 2 at room temperature for 3 h, it undergoes displacement of the triphenylphosphine ligand to form the dipalladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)Br]₂{μ,η²‐C₅H₃N(CH₃)}₂, 3 , in which the two 4‐methylpyridine ligands coordinated through carbon to one metal center and bridging the other metal through the nitrogen atom. Complexes 2 and 3 are characterized by X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

Pallada‐ and platinacycle complexes of phosphorus ylides; synthesis,X‐ray characterization,theoretical and electrochemical studies and application of Pd(II) complexes as catalyst in Suzuki‐Miyaura coupling reaction

The new unsymmetrical phosphonium salts [Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂CH₂C(O)C₆H₄R]Br (R= m ‐Br ( S ₁ ) and p ‐CN ( S ₂ )) were synthesized in the reaction of 1,1‐bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) and BrCH₂C(O)C₆H₄R (R= m ‐Br and p ‐CN) ketones, respectively. Further treatment with NEt₃ gave the α‐keto stabilized phosphorus ylides Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂C(H)C(O)C₆H₄R (R= m ‐Br ( Y ₁ ) and p ‐CN ( Y ₂ )). These ligands were reacted with [MCl₂(cod)] (M= Pd and Pt; cod= 1,5‐cyclooctadiene) to give the pallada‐ and platinacycle complexes [MCl₂(Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂C(H)C(O)C₆H₄R)] (M= Pd, R= m ‐Br ( 3 ); R= p ‐CN ( 4 ) and M= Pt, R= m ‐Br ( 5 ); R= p ‐CN ( 6 )). Cyclic voltammetry, elemental analysis, IR and NMR (¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P) spectroscopic methods were used for characterization of the obtained compounds. Further, the structure of complexes 3 and 4 were characterized crystallographically. Palladacycles 3 and 4 were proved to be excellent catalysts for the Suzuki‐Miyaura coupling reactions of various aryl chlorides and arylboronic acids in mixed DMF/H₂O media. Also, the bonding situations between two interacted fragments [PtCl₂] and Y ₁ and Y ₂ ligands in platinacycles 5 and 6 were investigated based on DFT method by using NBO, EDA and ETS‐NOCV analysis.     

Halbsandwichkomplexe des Iridiums mit Tetramethylcyclopentadienyl als Ringligand

Halfsandwich‐Type Complexes of Iridium with Tetramethylcyclopentadienyl as Ligand The iridium(I) complexes [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)Ir(C₂H₄)₂] ( 2 ) and [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)Ir(CO)₂] ( 4 ), which have been prepared from [IrCl(C₂H₄)₂]₂ or [IrCl(CO)₃]_n and LiC₅HMe₄, react with tosylchloride as well as with X₂ (X = Cl, Br, I) by oxidative addition to yield the corresponding iridium(III) compounds. Treating the complexes [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)IrX₂]_n ( 7 — 9 ) with CO or PR₃ leads to a cleavage of the halide bridges and to the formation of the mononuclear products [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)IrX₂(CO)] ( 10 , 11 ) and [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)IrX₂(PR₃)] ( 12 — 20 ), respectively. The molecular structure of [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)IrBr₂(PiPr₃)] ( 18 ) was determined crystallographically. The reactions of 8 (X = Br) and 9 (X = I) with Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂ (n = 1 or 2) afford the bridged compounds [{(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)IrX₂}₂{μ‐Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂}] ( 21—23 ). The dihalide complexes [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)IrI₂(PPh₃)] ( 16 ) and [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)IrX₂(PiPr₃)] ( 17—19 ) react with hydride sources to give the dihydrido‐ and monohydrido derivatives [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)IrH₂(PPh₃)] ( 24 ) and [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)IrH(X)(PiPr₃)] ( 25—27 ). The related dimethyl and monomethyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)Ir(CH₃)₂(PiPr₃)] ( 28 ) and [(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)IrCH₃(I)(PiPr₃)] ( 29 ) have been obtained from the dihalide precursors 18 or 19 and CH₃MgI in the molar ratio of 1:2 or 1:1, respectively.     

Synthesis,Reactivity and Crystal Structures of the Palladium(II) Complexes with the Pyrimidine Containing Ligand: Crystal Structures of [Pd(PPh3)(η1‐C4H3N2)(η2‐S2CNC4H8)] and [Pd(PPh3)(η1‐C4H3N2)(η2‐Tp)]

Treatment of Pd(PPh₃)₄ with 5‐bromo‐pyrimidine [C₄H₃N₂Br] in dichloromethane at ambient temperature cause the oxidative addition reaction to produce the palladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(Br)], 1 , by substituting two triphenylphosphine ligands. In acetonitrile solution of 1 in refluxing temperature for 1 day, it do not undergo displacement of the triphenylphosphine ligand to form the dipalladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)Br]₂{μ,η²‐(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)}₂, or bromide ligand to form chelating pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂(η²‐C₄H₃N₂)]Br. Complex 1 reacted with bidentate ligand, NH₄S₂CNC₄H₈, and tridentate ligand, KTp {Tp = tris(pyrazoyl‐1‐yl)borate}, to obtain the η²‐dithiocarbamate η¹‐pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(η²‐S₂CNC₄H₈)], 4 and η²‐Tp η¹‐pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(η²‐Tp)], 5 , respectively. Complexes 4 and 5 are characterized by X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

Interaction of the iridium(III) trihydridophosphine complex with fullerene C60 under thermal and photochemical excitation

The interaction of the PPh₃-stabilized iridium trihydrido complex H₃Ir(PPh₃)₃ with fullerene C₆₀ under thermal and photochemical excitation was studied under anaerobic conditions. Heating (100 °C) or photolysis by the visible light of the H₃Ir(PPh₃)₃-C₆₀ 650 nm, which are characteristic of the ·²-coordinated C₆₀ in several fullerene-containing metal complexes. The kinetic behavior of the H₃Ir(PPh₃)₃)-C₆₀ system in benzonitrile was investigated using a Nd³⁺-YAG laser (λ=532 nm). The quenching rate constant determined from the dependence of the effective first-order quenching constant of C₆₀(T) on the concentration of H₃Ir(PPh₃)₃ is equal to 1.1·10⁹ L mol⁻¹ s⁻¹. The quenching of C₆₀(T) by the iridium hydridophosphine complex follows the reductive mechanism to form a C₆₀ monoanion. The ESR signal with g=2.000 and ΔH=0.17 mT (at room temperature) and characteristic absorption bands in the near-IR region at 940, 1004, and 1076 nm support the formation of the C₆₀ monoanion during the interaction of the triplet-excited C₆₀ with H₃Ir(PPh₃)₃. Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 12, pp. 2145–2148, December, 1997.     

A 2-iridafuran from reaction between a 1-iridaindene and methyl propiolate

The coordinatively unsaturated 1-iridaindene, Ir[C₈H₅(Ph-3)]Cl(PPh₃)₂ has a labile chloride ligand and is easily converted to the corresponding iodide, Ir[C₈H₅(Ph-3)]I(PPh₃)₂ (1) by reaction with NaI. When Ir[C₈H₅(Ph-3)]I(PPh₃)₂ (1) is treated with methyl propiolate a reactive five-coordinate complex with both a diphenylvinyl ligand from ring-opening of the 1-iridaindene, and a 3-methoxy-3-oxoprop-1-ynyl ligand from deprotonation of methyl propiolate, is first produced. Reaction of this complex with aqueous HCl generates the 2-iridafuran, Ir[OC₃H(CHCPh₂-3)(OMe-5)]ClI(PPh₃)₂ (2) probably from initial protonation at the β-carbon of the 3-methoxy-3-oxoprop-1-ynyl ligand to form a vinylidene ligand and subsequent migration of the diphenylvinyl ligand to the α-carbon of this ligand accompanied by oxygen coordination to iridium. Similar treatment of 1 with methyl propiolate followed by aqueous HI gives the corresponding complex, Ir[OC₃H(CHCPh₂-3)(OMe-5)]I₂(PPh₃)₂ (3). The X-ray crystal structures of 2 and 3 together with NMR spectroscopic data confirm the 2-metallafuran structures of these complexes.     

Kupferchalkogenid‐Clusterverbindungen mit Brom‐funktionalisierter Ligandenhülle

Five new copper chalcogenide cluster molecules, [Cu₄(S–C₆H₄–Br)₄(PPh₃)₄] ( 1 ), [Cu₂₂Se₆(S–C₆H₄–Br)₁₀(PPh₃)₈] ( 2 ), [Cu₂₈Se₆(S–C₆H₄–Br)₁₆(PPh₃)₈] ( 3 ), [Cu₄₇Se₁₀(S–C₆H₄–Br)₂₁(OAc)₆(PPh₃)₈] ( 4 ) and [Cu₈(S–C₆H₄–Br)₆(S₂C–NMe₂)₂(PPh₃)₄] ( 5 ) have been synthesized and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis. Compounds 1 – 4 were prepared from the reaction of CuOAc, p‐Br–C₆H₄–SSiMe₃ and Se(SiMe₃)₂ in the presence of PPh₃. In a further reaction of 1 with ⁱPrMgCl and (Me₂N–CS₂)₂ cluster 5 was crystallized.     

Phosphine (oxide)‐(thio) phenolate palladium complexes: Synthesis,characterization and (co)polymerization of norbornene

A series of palladium complexes ( 2a–2g ) ( 2a : [6‐^tBu‐2‐PPh₂‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2b : [6‐C₆F₅–2‐PPh₂‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2c : [6‐^tBu‐2‐PPh^tBu‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2d : [2‐PPh^tBu‐C₆H₄O] PdMe(Py); 2e : [6‐SiMe₃–2‐PPh₂‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2f : [2‐^tBu‐6‐(Ph₂P=O)‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2g : [6‐SiMe₃–2‐(Ph₂P=O)‐C₆H₃S]PdMe(Py)) bearing phosphine (oxide)‐(thio) phenolate ligand have been efficiently synthesized and characterized. The solid‐state structures of complexes 2d , 2f and 2g have been further confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, which revealed a square‐planar geometry of palladium center. In the presence of B(C₆F₅)₃, these complexes can be used as catalysts to polymerize norbornene (NB) with relatively high yields, producing vinyl‐addition polymers. Interestingly, 2a /B(C₆F₅)₃ system catalyzed the polymerization of NB in living polymerization manner at high temperature (polydispersity index 1.07, M_n up to 1.5 × 10⁴). The co‐polymerization of NB and polar monomers was also studied using catalysts 2a and 2f . All the obtained co‐polymers could dissolve in common solvent.     

Chirale Halbsandwich‐Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl‐Rhodium(III)‐ und Iridium(III)‐Komplexe mit Schiff‐Basen aus Salicylaldehyd und α‐Aminosäureestern [1]

Chiral Half‐sandwich Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl Rhodium(III) and Iridium(III) Complexes with Schiff Bases from Salicylaldehyde and α‐Amino Acid Esters [1] A series of diastereoisomeric half‐sandwich complexes with Schiff bases from salicylaldehyde and L‐α‐amino acid esters including chiral metal atoms, [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(Cl)M(N,O‐Schiff base)], has been obtained from chloro bridged complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(Cl)M(μ‐Cl)]₂ (M = Rh, Ir). Abstraction of chloride from these complexes with Ag[BF₄] or Ag[SO₃CF₃] affords the highly sensitive compounds [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(N,O‐Schiff base]⁺X^? (M = Rh, Ir; X = BF₄, CF₃SO₃) to which PPh₃ can be added under formation of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(PPh₃)(N,O‐Schiff base)]⁺X^?. The diastereoisomeric ratio of the complexes ( 1 ‐ 7 and 11 ‐ 12 ) has been determined from NMR spectra.     

Spectral and crystallography studies of new palladacycle complexes with P,C‐ and C,C‐donor ligands; Application of (OAL16) to optimizing the yield of Mizoroki‐Heck reaction

The new symmetrical diphosphonium salt [Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂(CH₂C(O)C₆H₄Br)₂] Br₂ ( S ) was synthesized in the reaction of 1,2‐bis (diphenylphosphino) ethane (dppe) and related ketone. Further treatment with NEt₃ gave the symmetrical α‐keto stabilized diphosphine ylide [Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂(CHC(O)C₆H₄Br)₂] ( Y ¹ ). The unsymmetrical α‐keto stabilized diphosphine ylide [Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂(CHC(O)C₆H₄Br)] ( Y ² ) was synthesized in the reaction of diphosphine in 1:1 ratio with 2.3′‐dibromoacetophenone, then treatment with NEt_3. The reaction of dibromo (1,5‐cyclooctadiene)palladium (II), [PdBr₂(COD)] with this ligand ( Y ¹ ) in equimolar ratio gave the new C,C‐chelated [PdBr₂(Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂(C(H)C(O)C₆H₄Br)₂)] ( 1 ) and with unsymmetrical phosphorus ylide [Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂C(H)C(O)C₆H₄Br] ( Y ² ) gave the new P, C‐chelated palladacycle complex [PdBr₂(Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂C(H)C(O)Br)] ( 2 ). These compounds were characterized successfully by FT‐IR, NMR (¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P) spectroscopic methods and the crystal structure of Y ¹ and 2 were elucidated by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The results indicated that the complex 1 was C, C‐chelated whereas complex 2 was P, C‐chelated. These air/moisture stable complexes were employed as efficient catalysts for the Mizoroki‐Heck cross‐coupling reaction of several aryl chlorides, and the Taguchi method was used to optimize the yield of Mizoroki‐Heck coupling. The optimum condition was found to be as followed: base; K₂CO₃, solvent; DMF and loading of catalyst; 0.005 mmol.     

Cyclization Reactions of Aryl Propargyl Acetates with Tethered Epoxide Induced by Ruthenium Complex

Reactions of the ruthenium complex [Ru]Cl ([Ru]=Cp(PPh₃)₂Ru; Cp=η⁵‐C₅H₅) with several aryl propargyl acetates, each with an ortho ‐substituted chain of various length containing an epoxide on the aromatic ring and with or without methyl substitutents on the epoxide ring, bring about novel cyclizations. The cyclization reactions of HC≡CCH(OAc)(C₆H₄)CH₂(RC₂H₂O) (R=H, 6 a ; R=CH₃, 6 b , where RC₂H₂O is an epoxide ring) in MeOH give the vinylidene complexes 5 a – b , respectively, each with the Cβ integrated into a tetrahydro‐5H ‐benzo[7]annulen‐6‐ol ring. A C−C bond formation takes place between the propargyl acetate and the less substituted carbon of the epoxide ring. Further cyclizations of 5 a – b induced by HBF₄ give the corresponding vinylidene complexes 8 a – b each with a new 8‐oxabicyclo‐[3.2.1]octane ring by removal of a methanol molecule in high yield. For similar aryl propargyl acetates with a shorter epoxide chain, the cyclization gives a mixture of a vinylidene complex with a tetrahydronaphthalen‐1‐ol ring and a carbene complex with a tricyclic indeno‐furan ring. For the cyclization of 18 , with a longer epoxide chain, opening of the epoxide is required to afford the vicinal bromohydrin 22 , then tandem cyclization occurs in one pot. Products are characterized by spectroscopic methods as well as by XRD analysis.     

Intermolecular interactions in N‐(ferrocenyl­methyl)­anthracene‐9‐carbox­amide

The title compound, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₁H₁₆NO)], was synthesized from the coupling reaction of anthracene‐9‐carboxyl­ic acid and ferrocenyl­methyl­amine. The ferrocenyl (Fc) group and the anthracene ring system both lie approximately orthogonal to the amide moiety. An amide–amide interaction (along the a axis) is the principal interaction [N⋯O = 2.910 (2) Å]. A C—H⋯π(arene) interaction [C⋯centroid = 3.573 (2) Å] and a C—H⋯O interaction [C⋯O = 3.275 (3) Å] complete the hydrogen bonding; two short (Fc)C⋯C(anthracene) contacts are also present.     

C—H⋯O,C—H⋯π and π–π inter­actions in three benzofuran‐2‐yl ketone derivatives

The mol­ecules of 2‐benzoyl‐1‐benzofuran, C₁₅H₁₀O₂, (I), inter­act through double C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming dimers that are further linked by C—H⋯O, C—H⋯π and π–π inter­actions, resulting in a three‐dimensional supramolecular network. The dihedral angle between the benzo­yl and benzofuran fragments in (I) is 46.15 (3)°. The mol­ecules of bis­(5‐bromo‐1‐benzofuran‐2‐yl) ketone, C₁₇H₈Br₂O₃, (II), exhibit C₂ symmetry, with the carbon­yl group (C=O) lying along the twofold rotation axis, and are linked by a combination of C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π inter­actions and Br⋯Br contacts to form sheets. The stability of the mol­ecular packing in 3‐mesit­yl‐3‐methyl­cyclo­but­yl 3‐methyl­naphtho[1,2‐b]furan‐2‐yl ketone, C₂₈H₂₈O₂, (III), arises from C—H⋯π and π–π stacking inter­actions. The fused naphthofuran moiety in (III) is essentially planar and makes a dihedral angle of 81.61 (3)° with the mean plane of the trimethyl­benzene ring.     

Unexpected Chemistry from the Reaction of Naphthyl and Acetylene at Combustion‐Like Temperatures

The hydrogen abstraction/acetylene addition (HACA) mechanism has long been viewed as a key route to aromatic ring growth of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in combustion systems. However, doubt has been drawn on the ubiquity of the mechanism by recent electronic structure calculations which predict that the HACA mechanism starting from the naphthyl radical preferentially forms acenaphthylene, thereby blocking cyclization to a third six‐membered ring. Here, by probing the products formed in the reaction of 1‐ and 2‐naphthyl radicals in excess acetylene under combustion‐like conditions with the help of photoionization mass spectrometry, we provide experimental evidence that this reaction produces 1‐ and 2‐ethynylnaphthalenes (C₁₂H₈), acenaphthylene (C₁₂H₈) and diethynylnaphthalenes (C₁₄H₈). Importantly, neither phenanthrene nor anthracene (C₁₄H₁₀) was found, which indicates that the HACA mechanism does not lead to cyclization of the third aromatic ring as expected but rather undergoes ethynyl substitution reactions instead.     

Transition‐Metal‐Mediated Cleavage of Fluoro‐Silanes under Mild Conditions

Si?F bond cleavage of fluoro‐silanes was achieved by transition‐metal complexes under mild and neutral conditions. The Iridium‐hydride complex [Ir(H)(CO)(PPh₃)₃] was found to readily break the Si?F bond of the diphosphine‐ difluorosilane {(o‐Ph₂P)C₆H₄}₂Si(F)₂ to afford a silyl complex [{[o‐(iPh₂P)C₆H₄]₂(F)Si}Ir(CO)(PPh₃)] and HF. Density functional theory calculations disclose a reaction mechanism in which a hypervalent silicon species with a dative Ir→Si interaction plays a crucial role. The Ir→Si interaction changes the character of the H on the Ir from hydridic to protic, and makes the F on Si more anionic, leading to the formation of H^δ+???F^δ? interaction. Then the Si?F and Ir?H bonds are readily broken to afford the silyl complex and HF through σ‐bond metathesis. Furthermore, the analogous rhodium complex [Rh(H)(CO)(PPh₃)₃] was found to promote the cleavage of the Si?F bond of the triphosphine‐monofluorosilane {(o‐Ph₂P)C₆H₄}₃Si(F) even at ambient temperature.     

Synthesis and characterization of three dinuclear copper(I) complexes of 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐1,2‐dicarba‐closo‐dodecaborane

Three dinuclear copper(I) complexes, [Cu₂(µ‐Cl)₂(1,2‐(PPh₂)₂‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)₂]·2CH₂Cl₂ ( 1 ), [Cu₂(µ‐Br)₂(1,2‐(PPh₂)₂‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)₂]·2THF ( 2 ) and {Cu₂(µ‐I)₂[1,2‐(PPh₂)₂‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀]₂} ( 3 ) have been synthesized by the reactions of CuX (X = Cl, Br and I) with the closo ligand 1,2‐(PPh₂)₂‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀. All these complexes were characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray structure determination. Single crystal X‐ray structure determinations show that every complex contained di‐µ‐X‐bridged structure involving a crossed parallelogram plane formed by two Cu atoms and two X atoms (X = Cl, Br, I). The geometry at the Cu atom was a distorted tetrahedron, in which two positions were occupied by two P atoms of the PPh₂ groups connected to the two C atoms of carborane (Cc), and the other two resulted from two X atoms which bridged the other Cu atom at the same time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of copper(I) complexes with 1,2‐diphenylphosphino‐1,2‐dicarba‐closo‐dodecaborane as ligand characterized by X‐ray diffraction. The catalytic property of the complex 3 for the amination of iodobenzene with aniline was also investigated. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Similar molecular constitutions but different conformations and different supramolecular assemblies in two related fused tetracyclic benzo[b]pyrimido[5,4‐f]azepine derivatives

A simple and effective two‐step approach to tricyclic pyrimidine‐fused benzazepines has been adapted to give the tetracyclic analogues. In (RS)‐8‐chloro‐6‐methyl‐1,2,6,7‐tetrahydropyrimido[5′,4′:6,7]azepino[3,2,1‐hi]indole, C₁₅H₁₄ClN₃, (I), the five‐membered ring adopts an envelope conformation, as does the reduced pyridine ring in (RS)‐9‐chloro‐7‐methyl‐2,3,7,8‐tetrahydro‐1H‐pyrimido[5′,4′:6,7]azepino[3,2,1‐ij]quinoline, C₁₆H₁₆ClN₃, (II). However, the seven‐membered rings in (I) and (II) adopt very different conformations, with the result that the methyl substituent occupies a quasi‐axial site in (I) but a quasi‐equatorial site in (II). The molecules of (I) are linked by C—H...N hydrogen bonds to form C(5) chains and inversion‐related pairs of chains are linked by a π–π stacking interaction. A combination of a C—H...π hydrogen bond and two C—Cl...π interactions links the molecules of (II) into complex sheets. Comparisons are made with some similar fused heterocyclic compounds.     

Alkyl- und Arylkomplexe des Iridiums und Rhodiums. XIX. Reaktion von Carbonsäuren mit ausgewählten Organoverbindungen von Ir(I) und Rh(I): Bildung von Arylhydrido-, Carboxylatohydrido- und Carboxylato-Derivaten

Alkyl and Aryl Complexes of Iridium and Rhodium. XIX. Reaction of Carboxylic Acids with Selected Organo Compounds of Ir(I) and Rh(I): Formation of Arylhydrido, Carboxylatohydrido, and Carboxylato Derivatives cis-Arylhydridoiridium(III) complexes IrH(Ar)(O₂CR)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (R = Me: Ar = C₆H₅, 4-MeC₆H₄; R = Et: Ar = 4-MeC₆H₄, 2,4-Me₂C₆H₃) could be prepared by oxidative addition of carboxylic acids to aryliridium(I) compounds Ir(Ar)(CO)(PPh₃)₂. Reaction of aliphatic carboxylic acids with alkyliridium(I) derivatives Ir(Alk)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ and Ir(Alk)[PhP(CH₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂] (Alk = CH₂CMe₃, CH₂SiMe₃) lead to dicarboxylatoiridium(III) hydrides IrH(O₂CR)₂(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (R = Me, Et, i-Pr) and IrH(O₂CR)₂[PhP(CH₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂] (R = Me, Et). Ir(4-MeC₆H₄CO₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ was obtained from Ir(CH₂SiMe₃)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ and 4-MeC₆H₄CO₂H. Interaction of organorhodium complexes Rh(R′)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (R′ = CH₂SiMe₃, 4-MeC₆H₄) and Rh(R′)[PhP(CH₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂] (R′ = CH₂CMe₃, 4-MeC₆H₄) with aliphatic and aromatic carboxylic acids yielded carboxylatorhodium(I) compounds Rh(O₂CR)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (R = Me, t-Bu, 4-MeC₆H₄) and Rh(O₂CR)[PhP(CH₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂] (R = Me, 4-MeC₆H₄).