σ‐Hole Bond Versus Hydrogen Bond: From Tetravalent to Pentavalent N,P, and As Atoms

Ab initio calculations were performed on complexes of ZH₄⁺ (Z=N, P, As) and their fluoro derivatives, ZFH₃⁺ and ZF₄⁺, with a HCN (or LiCN) molecule acting as the Lewis base through the nitrogen electronegative center. It was found that the complexes are linked by the Z? H???N hydrogen bond or another type of noncovalent interaction in which the tetravalent heavy atom of the cation acts as the Lewis acid center, that is, when the Z???N link exists, which may be classified as the σ‐hole bond. The formation of the latter interaction is usually preferable to the formation of the corresponding hydrogen bond. The Z???N interaction may be also considered as the preliminary stage of the S_N2 reaction. This is supported by the observation that for a short Z???N contact, the corresponding complex geometry coincides with the trigonal‐bipyramidal geometry typical for the transition state of the S_N2 reaction. The Z???N interaction for some of complexes analyzed here possesses characteristics typical for covalent bonds. Numerous interrelations between geometrical, topological and energetic parameters are discussed. The natural bond orbital method as well as the Quantum Theory of “Atoms in Molecules” is applied to characterize interactions in the analyzed complexes. The experimental evidences of the existence of these interactions, based on the Cambridge Structure Database search, are also presented. In addition, it is justified that mechanisms of the formation of the Z???N interactions are similar to the processes occurring for the other noncovalent links. The formation of Z???N interaction as well as of other interactions may be explained with the use of the σ‐hole concept.     

Cooperativity between the Halogen Bond and the Hydrogen Bond in H3N⋅⋅⋅XY⋅⋅⋅HF Complexes (X,Y=F,Cl, Br)

Ab initio calculations are used to provide information on H₃N???XY???HF triads (X, Y=F, Cl, Br) each having a halogen bond and a hydrogen bond. The investigated triads include H₃N???Br₂‐HF, H₃N???Cl₂???HF, H₃N???BrCI???HF, H₃N???BrF???HF, and H₃N???ClF???HF. To understand the properties of the systems better, the corresponding dyads are also investigated. Molecular geometries, binding energies, and infrared spectra of monomers, dyads, and triads are studied at the MP2 level of theory with the 6‐311++G(d,p) basis set. Because the primary aim of this study is to examine cooperative effects, particular attention is given to parameters such as cooperative energies, many‐body interaction energies, and cooperativity factors. The cooperative energy ranges from ?1.45 to ?4.64 kcal mol^?1, the three‐body interaction energy from ?2.17 to ?6.71 kcal mol^?1, and the cooperativity factor from 1.27 to 4.35. These results indicate significant cooperativity between the halogen and hydrogen bonds in these complexes. This cooperativity is much greater than that between hydrogen bonds. The effect of a halogen bond on a hydrogen bond is more pronounced than that of a hydrogen bond on a halogen bond.     

Using (FH)2 and (FH)3 to Bridge the σ‐Hole and the Lone Pair at P in Complexes with H2XP,for X=CH3, OH,H, CCH,F, Cl,NC, and CN

Ab initio MP2/aug′‐cc‐pVTZ calculations are used to investigate the binary complexes H₂XP:HF, the ternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₂, and the quaternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₃, for X=CH₃, OH, H, CCH, F, Cl, NC, and CN. Hydrogen‐bonded (HB) binary complexes are formed between all H₂XP molecules and FH, but only H₂FP, H₂ClP, and H₂(NC)P form pnicogen‐bonded (ZB) complexes with FH. Ternary complexes with (FH)₂ are stabilized by F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds and F???P pnicogen bonds, except for H₂(CH₃)P:(FH)₂ and H₃P:(FH)₂, which do not have pnicogen bonds. All quaternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₃ are stabilized by both F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds and P???F pnicogen bonds. Thus, (FH)₂ with two exceptions, and (FH)₃ can bridge the σ‐hole and the lone pair at P in these complexes. The binding energies of H₂XP:(FH)₃ complexes are significantly greater than the binding energies of H₂XP:(FH)₂ complexes, and nonadditivities are synergistic in both series. Charge transfer occurs across all intermolecular bonds from the lone‐pair donor atom to an antibonding σ* orbital of the acceptor molecule, and stabilizes these complexes. Charge‐transfer energies across the pnicogen bond correlate with the intermolecular P?F distance, while charge‐transfer energies across F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds correlate with the distance between the lone‐pair donor atom and the hydrogen‐bonded H atom. In binary and quaternary complexes, charge transfer energies also correlate with the distance between the electron‐donor atom and the hydrogen‐bonded F atom. EOM‐CCSD spin‐spin coupling constants ^2hJ(F–P) across F?H???P hydrogen bonds, and ^1pJ(P–F) across pnicogen bonds in binary, ternary, and quaternary complexes exhibit strong correlations with the corresponding intermolecular distances. Hydrogen bonds are better transmitters of F–P coupling data than pnicogen bonds, despite the longer F???P distances in F?H???P hydrogen bonds compared to P???F pnicogen bonds. There is a correlation between the two bond coupling constants ^2hJ(F–F) in the quaternary complexes and the corresponding intermolecular distances, but not in the ternary complexes, a reflection of the distorted geometries of the bridging dimers in ternary complexes.     

Clusters of Ammonium Cation—Hydrogen Bond versus σ‐Hole Bond

MP2/6‐311++G(d,p) calculations were performed on the NH₄⁺ ??? (HCN)_n and NH₄⁺ ??? (N₂)_n clusters (n=1–8), and interactions within them were analyzed. It was found that for molecules of N₂ and HCN, the N centers play the role of the Lewis bases, whereas the ammonium cation acts as the Lewis acid, as it is characterized by sites of positive electrostatic potential, that is, H atoms and the sites located at the N atom in the extension of the H?N bonds. Hence, the coordination number for the ammonium cation is eight, and two types of interactions of this cation with the Lewis base centers are possible: N?H ??? N hydrogen bonds and H?N ??? N interactions that are classified as σ‐hole bonds. Redistribution of the electronic charge resulting from complexation of the ammonium cation was analyzed. On the one hand, the interactions are similar, as they lead to electronic charge transfer from the Lewis base (HCN or N₂ in this study) to NH₄⁺. On the other hand, the hydrogen bond results in the accumulation of electronic charge on the N atom of the NH₄⁺ ion, whereas the σ‐hole bond results in the depletion of the electronic charge on this atom. Quantum theory of “atoms in molecules” and the natural bond orbital method were applied to deepen the understanding of the nature of the interactions analyzed. Density functional theory/natural energy decomposition analysis was used to analyze the interactions of the ammonium ion with various types of Lewis bases. Different correlations between the geometrical, energetic, and topological parameters were found and discussed.     

Strong N−X⋅⋅⋅O−N Halogen Bonds: A Comprehensive Study on N‐Halosaccharin Pyridine N‐Oxide Complexes

A study of the strong N?X???^?O?N⁺ (X=I, Br) halogen bonding interactions reports 2×27 donor×acceptor complexes of N‐halosaccharins and pyridine N‐oxides (PyNO). DFT calculations were used to investigate the X???O halogen bond (XB) interaction energies in 54 complexes. A simplified computationally fast electrostatic model was developed for predicting the X???O XBs. The XB interaction energies vary from ?47.5 to ?120.3 kJ mol^?1; the strongest N?I???^?O?N⁺ XBs approaching those of 3‐center‐4‐electron [N?I?N]⁺ halogen‐bonded systems (ca. 160 kJ mol^?1). ¹H NMR association constants (K_XB) determined in CDCl₃ and [D₆]acetone vary from 2.0×10⁰ to >10⁸ m ^?1 and correlate well with the calculated donor×acceptor complexation enthalpies found between ?38.4 and ?77.5 kJ mol^?1. In X‐ray crystal structures, the N‐iodosaccharin‐PyNO complexes manifest short interaction ratios (R_XB) between 0.65–0.67 for the N?I???^?O?N⁺ halogen bond.     

Cooperativity between the Dihydrogen Bond and the N⋅⋅⋅HC Hydrogen Bond in LiH–(HCN)n Complexes

The cooperativity between the dihydrogen bond and the N???HC hydrogen bond in LiH–(HCN)_n (n=2 and 3) complexes is investigated at the MP2 level of theory. The bond lengths, dipole moments, and energies are analyzed. It is demonstrated that synergetic effects are present in the complexes. The cooperativity contribution of the dihydrogen bond is smaller than that of the N???HC hydrogen bond. The three‐body energy in systems involving different types of hydrogen bonds is larger than that in the same hydrogen‐bonded systems. NBO analyses indicate that orbital interaction, charge transfer, and bond polarization are mainly responsible for the cooperativity between the two types of hydrogen bonds.     

CH⋅⋅⋅N Hydrogen‐Bonding Interaction in 7‐Azaindole:CHX3 (X=F,Cl) Complexes

The C?H???Y (Y=hydrogen‐bond acceptor) interactions are somewhat unconventional in the context of hydrogen‐bonding interactions. Typical C?H stretching frequency shifts in the hydrogen‐bond donor C?H group are not only small, that is, of the order of a few tens of cm^?1, but also bidirectional, that is, they can be red or blue shifted depending on the hydrogen‐bond acceptor. In this work we examine the C?H???N interaction in complexes of 7‐azaindole with CHCl₃ and CHF₃ that are prepared in the gas phase through supersonic jet expansion using the fluorescence depletion by infra‐red (FDIR) method. Although the hydrogen‐bond acceptor, 7‐azaindole, has multiple sites of interaction, it is found that the C?H???N hydrogen‐bonding interaction prevails over the others. The electronic excitation spectra suggest that both complexes are more stabilized in the S₁ state than in the S₀ state. The C?H stretching frequency is found to be red shifted by 82 cm^?1 in the CHCl₃ complex, which is the largest redshift reported so far in gas‐phase investigations of 1:1 haloform complexes with various substrates. In the CHF₃ complex the observed C?H frequency is blue shifted by 4 cm^?1. This is at variance with the frequency shifts that are predicted using several computational methods; these predict at best a redshift of 8.5 cm^?1. This discrepancy is analogous to that reported for the pyridine‐CHF₃ complex [W. A. Herrebout, S. M. Melikova, S. N. Delanoye, K. S. Rutkowski, D. N. Shchepkin, B. J. van der Veken, J. Phys. Chem. A­ 2005 , 109, 3038], in which the blueshift is termed a pseudo blueshift and is shown to be due to the shifting of levels caused by Fermi resonance between the overtones of the C?H bending and stretching modes. The dissociation energies, (D₀), of the CHCl₃ and CHF₃ complexes are computed (MP2/aug‐cc‐pVDZ level) as 6.46 and 5.06 kcal mol^?1, respectively.     

Interplay between Metal⋅⋅⋅π Interactions and Hydrogen Bonds: Some Unusual Synergetic Effects of Coinage Metals and Substituents

The ternary systems of C₂H₄ (C₂H₂ or C₆H₆)‐MCN‐HF (M=Cu, Ag, Au) and the respective binary systems were investigated to study the interplay between metal???π interactions and hydrogen bonds. The metal???π interactions in C₂H₄‐MCN become stronger with the irregular order Ag<Cu<Au, while the hydrogen bonds in MCN‐HF become weaker following the same order. The metal???π interactions are weakened as the H atoms in the π system are replaced with electron‐withdrawing groups and enhanced by electron‐donating groups. Type 1 of these ternary systems, in which MCN acts as Lewis base and acid simultaneously, is more stable than type 2, in which C₂H₄ acts as a double Lewis base. Negative cooperativity is present in type 2 ternary systems with a weakening of the metal???π interactions and the hydrogen bonds. Positive cooperativity is found in type 1 ternary systems with an enhancement of the metal???π interactions and the hydrogen bonds, except for C₂(CN)₄‐AuCN‐HF‐1. The weaker metal???π interaction in C₆H₆‐AuCN has a greater enhancing effect on the hydrogen bond in AuCN‐HF than those in C₂H₄‐AuCN and C₂H₂‐AuCN. These synergetic effects were analyzed with the natural bond orbital and energy decomposition.     

Interplay between Cation–π and Coinage‐Metal–Oxygen Interactions: An Ab Initio Study and Cambridge Structural Database Survey

The interplay between cation–π and coinage‐metal–oxygen interactions are investigated in the ternary systems N???PhCCM???O (N=Li⁺, Na⁺, Mg²⁺; M=Ag, Au; O=water, methanol, ethanol). A synergetic effect is observed when cation–π and coinage‐metal–oxygen interactions coexist in the same complex. The cation–π interaction in most triads has a greater enhancing effect on the coinage‐metal–oxygen interaction. This effect is analyzed in terms of the binding distance, interaction energy, and electrostatic potential in the complexes. Furthermore, the formation, strength, and nature of both the cation–π and coinage‐metal–oxygen interactions can be understood in terms of electrostatic potential and energy decomposition. In addition, experimental evidence for the coexistence of both interactions is obtained from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD).     

Hydrogen bond and σ‐hole interaction in M2C=S···HCN (M = H,F, Cl,Br, HO,H3C,H2N) complex: Dual roles of C=S group and substitution effect

An ab initio computational study of the dual functions of C?S group in the M₂C?S ··· HCN (M = H, F, Cl, Br, HO, H₃C, H₂N) complex has been performed at the MP2(Full)/aug‐cc‐pVTZ level. The C?S group can act as both the electron donor and acceptor, thus two minima complexes were found for each molecular pairs. The interaction energy of hydrogen bond in the F, Cl, or Br substituted complexes is less negative than that in the corresponding H₂CS one, while the interaction energy of the σ‐hole interaction is more negative. The OH substitution weakens the hydrogen bond, whereas the H₃C and H₂N substitution strengthens it. The σ‐hole interaction in the HO, H₃C, and H₂N complexes is very weak. The substitution effect has been understood with electrostatic induction and conjugation effects. The energy decomposition analysis has been performed for the halogen‐substituted complexes. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2012.     

Tetrel bonds between PhSiF3/PhTH3 (T = Si,Ge, Sn) and H3ZO (Z = N,P, As): A pentacoordinate silicon (IV) complex

The nature of the complexes PhTH₃ H₃ZO and PhSiF₃ H₃ZO (T = Si, Ge, and Sn; Z = N, P, and As) has been investigated at the MP2/aug’‐cc‐pVTZ(PP) level. These complexes are primarily stabilized by one T···O tetrel bond. Interaction energies of these complexes vary from 11 to 220 kJ/mol, and T···O separations from 1.89 to 3.09 Å. Charge transfer from the O lone pair into the C T and T H σ* antibonding orbitals leads to the stabilization of these complexes. The T···O tetrel bond between PhTH₃/PhSiF₃ and H₃NO exhibits a significant degree of covalence, characterized by the large interaction energy, negative energy density, and large charge transfer. Furthermore, a pentacoordinate silicon (IV) complex is formed in PhSiF₃ H₃NO with the Si···O distance almost close to the length of Si O bond. This indicates that the oxygen atom in N‐oxides shows a strong affinity to the silicon atom in organosilicon compounds.     

Influence of the Li⋅⋅⋅π Interaction on the H/X⋅⋅⋅π Interactions in HOLi⋅⋅⋅C6H6⋅⋅⋅HOX/XOH (X=F,Cl, Br,I) Complexes

The influences of the Li???π interaction of C₆H₆???LiOH on the H???π interaction of C₆H₆???HOX (X=F, Cl, Br, I) and the X???π interaction of C₆H₆???XOH (X=Cl, Br, I) are investigated by means of full electronic second‐order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory calculations and “quantum theory of atoms in molecules” (QTAIM) studies. The binding energies, binding distances, infrared vibrational frequencies, and electron densities at the bond critical points (BCPs) of the hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds prove that the addition of the Li???π interaction to benzene weakens the H???π and X???π interactions. The influences of the Li???π interaction on H???π interactions are greater than those on X???π interactions; the influences of the H???π interactions on the Li???π interaction are greater than X???π interactions on Li???π interaction. The greater the influence of Li???π interaction on H/X???π interactions, the greater the influences of H/X???π interactions on Li???π interaction. QTAIM studies show that the intermolecular interactions of C₆H₆???HOX and C₆H₆???XOH are mainly of the π type. The electron densities at the BCPs of hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds decrease on going from bimolecular complexes to termolecular complexes, and the π‐electron densities at the BCPs show the same pattern. Natural bond orbital analyses show that the Li???π interaction reduces electron transfer from C₆H₆ to HOX and XOH.     

π‐Hole Bonds: Boron and Aluminum Lewis Acid Centers

MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ calculations were performed on complexes of boron and aluminum trihydrides and trihalides with hydrogen cyanide (ZH₃‐NCH and ZX₃‐NCH; Z=B, Al; X=F, Cl). The complexes are linked through the B???N and Al???N interactions, which are named as triel bonds and which are classified as π‐hole bonds. It was found that they possess numerous characteristics of typical covalent bonds, since they are ruled mainly by processes of the electron charge shift from the Lewis base to the Lewis acid unit. Other configurations of the ZH₃‐NCH and ZX₃‐NCH complexes linked by the dihydrogen, hydrogen, and halogen bonds were found. However, these interactions are much weaker than the corresponding π‐hole bonds. The quantum theory of atoms in molecules and the natural bond orbital approaches were applied to characterize the complexes and interactions analyzed. The crystal structures of triel trihydrides and triel trihalides were also analyzed for comparison with the results of calculations.     

The Role of Molecular Electrostatic Potentials in the Formation of a Halogen Bond in Furan⋅⋅⋅XY and Thiophene⋅⋅⋅XY Complexes

The halogen bonding of furan???XY and thiophene???XY (X=Cl, Br; Y=F, Cl, Br), involving σ‐ and π‐type interactions, was studied by using MP2 calculations and quantum theory of “atoms in molecules” (QTAIM) studies. The negative electrostatic potentials of furan and thiophene, as well as the most positive electrostatic potential (V_S,max) on the surface of the interacting X atom determined the geometries of the complexes. Linear relationships were found between interaction energy and V_S,max of the X atom, indicating that electrostatic interactions play an important role in these halogen‐bonding interactions. The halogen‐bonding interactions in furan???XY and thiophene???XY are weak, “closed‐shell” noncovalent interactions. The linear relationship of topological properties, energy properties, and the integration of interatomic surfaces versus V_S,max of atom X demonstrate the importance of the positive σ hole, as reflected by the computed V_S,max of atom X, in determining the topological properties of the halogen bonds.     

The competition of Y⋯o and X⋯n halogen bonds to enhance the group V σ‐hole interaction in the NCY⋯oPH3⋯NCX and OPH3⋯NCX⋯NCY (X,YF,Cl, and Br) complexes

The positive electrostatic potentials (ESP) outside the σ‐hole along the extension of O? P bond in O?PH₃ and the negative ESP outside the nitrogen atom along the extension of the C? N bond in NCX could form the Group V σ‐hole interaction O?PH₃?NCX. In this work, the complexes NCY?O?PH₃?NCX and O?PH₃?NCX?NCY (X, Y?F, Cl, Br) were designed to investigate the enhancing effects of Y?O and X?N halogen bonds on the P?N Group V σ‐hole interaction. With the addition of Y?O halogen bond, the V _{S, max} values outside the σ‐hole region of O?PH₃ becomes increasingly positive resulting in a stronger and more polarizable P?N interaction. With the addition of X?N halogen bond, the V _{S, min} values outside the nitrogen atom of NCX becomes increasingly negative, also resulting in a stronger and more polarizable P?N interaction. The Y?O halogen bonds affect the σ‐hole region (decreased density region) outside the phosphorus atom more than the P?N internuclear region (increased density region outside the nitrogen atom), while it is contrary for the X?N halogen bonds. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Simultaneous Aromatic–Beryllium Bonds and Aromatic–Anion Interactions: Naphthalene and Pyrene as Models of Fullerenes,Carbon Single‐Walled Nanotubes,and Graphene

The possibility of forming stable BeR₂:ArH:Y^? (R=H, F, Cl; ArH=naphthalene, pyrene; Y=Cl, Br) ternary complexes in which the beryllium compounds and anions are located on the opposite sides of an extended aromatic system is explored by means of MP2/aug‐cc‐pVDZ ab initio calculations. Comparison of the electron‐density distribution of these ternary complexes with the corresponding BeR₂:ArH and ArH:Y^? binary complexes reveals the existence of significant cooperativity between the two noncovalent interactions in the triads. The energetic effects of this cooperativity are quantified by evaluation of the three‐body interaction energy Δ³E in the framework of the many‐body interaction‐energy (MBIE) approach. Although an essential component of the interaction energies is electrostatic and is well reflected in the changes in the molecular electrostatic potential of the aromatic system on complexation, strong polarization effects, in particular for the BeR₂:ArH interactions, also play a significant role. The charge transfers associated with these polarization effects are responsible for significant distortion of both the BeR₂ and the aromatic moieties. The former are systematically bent in all the complexes, and the latter are curved to a degree that depends on the nature of the R substituents of the BeR₂ subunit.     

Group 12 Carbonates and their Binary Complexes with Nitrogen Bases and FH2Z Molecules (Z=P,As, Sb): Synergism in Forming Ternary Complexes

MCO₃ (M=Zn, Cd, Hg) forms a spodium bond with nitrogen-containing bases (HCN, NHCH₂, NH₃) and a pnicogen bond with FH₂Z (Z=P, As, Sb). The spodium bond is very strong with the interaction energy ranging from −31 kcal/mol to −56 kcal/mol. Both NHCH₂ and NH₃ have an equal electrostatic potential on the N atom, but the corresponding interaction energy is differentiated by 1.5–4 kcal/mol due to the existence of spodium and hydrogen bonds in the complex with NHCH₂ as the electron donor. The spodium bond is weakest in the HCN complex, which is not consistent with the change of the binding distance. The spodium bond becomes stronger in the CdCO₃<ZnCO₃<HgCO₃ sequence although the positive electrostatic potential on the Hg atom is smallest. This is because the electrostatic interaction is dominant in the spodium-bonded complexes of CdCO₃ and ZnCO₃ but the polarization interaction in that of HgCO₃. The pnicogen bond is much weaker than the spodium bond and the former has a larger enhancement than the latter in the FH₂Z⋅⋅⋅OCO₂M⋅⋅⋅N-base ternary complexes.     

Theoretical study on the interactions of halogen‐bonds and pnicogen‐bonds in phosphine derivatives with Br2, BrCl,and BrF

The MP2 ab initio quantum chemistry methods were utilized to study the halogen‐bond and pnicogen‐bond system formed between PH₂X (X = Br, CH₃, OH, CN, NO₂, CF₃) and BrY (Y = Br, Cl, F). Calculated results show that all substituent can form halogen‐bond complexes while part substituent can form pnicogen‐bond complexes. Traditional, chlorine‐shared and ion‐pair halogen‐bonds complexes have been found with the different substituent X and Y. The halogen‐bonds are stronger than the related pnicogen‐bonds. For halogen‐bonds, strongly electronegative substituents which are connected to the Lewis acid can strengthen the bonds and significantly influenced the structures and properties of the compounds. In contrast, the substituents which connected to the Lewis bases can produce opposite effects. The interaction energies of halogen‐bonds are 2.56 to 32.06 kcal·mol^?1; The strongest halogen‐bond was found in the complex of PH₂OH???BrF. The interaction energies of pnicogen‐bonds are in the range 1.20 to 2.28 kcal·mol^?1; the strongest pnicogen‐bond was found in PH₂Br???Br₂ complex. The charge transfer of lp(P) ? σ*(Br? Y), lp(F) ? σ*(Br? P), and lp(Br) ? σ*(X? P) play important roles in the formation of the halogen‐bonds and pnicogen‐bonds, which lead to polarization of the monomers. The polarization caused by the halogen‐bond is more obvious than that by the pnicogen‐bond, resulting in that some halogen‐bonds having little covalent character. The symmetry adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) energy decomposition analysis showes that the halogen‐bond and pnicogen‐bond interactions are predominantly electrostatic and dispersion, respectively.     

Structures of Trichloromethyl Thiocyanate,CCl3SCN,in Gaseous and Crystalline State

Trichloromethyl thiocyanate, CCl₃SCN, was structurally studied in both the gas and crystal phases by means of gas electron diffraction (GED) and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (XRD), respectively. Both experimental studies and quantum chemical calculations indicate a staggered orientation of the CCl₃ group relative to the SCN group. This conclusion is supported by the similarity of the C?SCN bond length to that of the anti‐structure of CH₂ClSCN (Berrueta Martínez et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 15805–15812). 1 Bond lengths and angles are similar for gas and crystal CCl₃SCN structures; however, the crystal structure presents different intermolecular interactions. These include halogen and chalcogen type interactions, the geometry of which was studied. Characteristic C‐Y???N angles (Y=Cl or S) close to 180° provide evidence for typical σ‐hole interactions along the halogen/chalcogen?carbon bond in N???Cl and N???S, intermolecular units.     

Synthesis and Characterization of [XeOXe]2+ in the Adduct‐Cation Salt, [CH3CN‐ ‐ ‐XeOXe‐ ‐ ‐NCCH3][AsF6]2

Acetonitrile and [FXeOXe‐ ‐ ‐FXeF][AsF₆] react at ?60 °C in anhydrous HF (aHF) to form the CH₃CN adduct of the previously unknown [XeOXe]²⁺ cation. The low‐temperature X‐ray structure of [CH₃CN‐ ‐ ‐XeOXe‐ ‐ ‐NCCH₃][AsF₆]₂ exhibits a well‐isolated adduct‐cation that has among the shortest Xe?N distances obtained for an sp‐hybridized nitrogen base adducted to xenon. The Raman spectrum was fully assigned by comparison with the calculated vibrational frequencies and with the aid of ¹⁸O‐enrichment studies. Natural bond orbital (NBO), atoms in molecules (AIM), electron localization function (ELF), and molecular electrostatic potential surface (MEPS) analyses show that the Xe?O bonds are semi‐ionic whereas the Xe?N bonds may be described as strong electrostatic (σ‐hole) interactions.