Reverse Arene Sandwich Structures Based upon π‐Hole⋅⋅⋅[MII] (d8 M=Pt,Pd) Interactions,where Positively Charged Metal Centers Play the Role of a Nucleophile

The complexes [Pt(tpp)] (H₂tpp=tetraphenylporphyrin), [M(acac)₂] (M=Pd, Pt, Hacac=acetylacetone), and [Pd(ba)₂] (Hba=benzoylacetone) were co‐crystallized with highly electron‐deficient arene systems to form reverse arene sandwich structures built by π‐hole???[M^II] (d⁸M=Pt, Pd) interactions. The adduct [Pt(tpp)]?2 C₆F₆ is monomeric, whereas the diketonate 1:1 adducts form columnar infinity 1D‐stack assembled by simultaneous action of both π‐hole???[M^II] and C???F interactions. The reverse sandwiches are based on noncovalent interactions and calculated ESP distributions indicate that in π‐hole???[M^II] contacts, [M^II] plays the role of a nucleophile.     

Influence of the Homopolar Dihydrogen Bonding CH⋅⋅⋅HC on Coordination Geometry: Experimental and Theoretical Studies

The reaction of the N‐thiophosphorylated thiourea (HOCH₂)(Me)₂CNHC(S)NHP(S)(OiPr)₂ (HL), deprotonated by the thiophosphorylamide group, with NiCl₂ leads to green needles of the pseudotetrahedral complex [Ni(L‐1,5‐S,S′)₂] ? 0.5 (n‐C₆H₁₄) or pale green blocks of the trans square‐planar complex trans‐[Ni(L‐1,5‐S,S′)₂]. The former complex is stabilized by homopolar dihydrogen C?H???H?C interactions formed by n‐hexane solvent molecules with the [Ni(L‐1,5‐S,S′)₂] unit. Furthermore, the dispersion‐dominated C?H??? H?C interactions are, together with other noncovalent interactions (C?H???N, C?H???Ni, C?H???S), responsible for pseudotetrahedral coordination around the Ni^II center in [Ni(L ‐1,5‐S,S′)₂] ? 0.5 (n‐C₆H₁₄).     

Reverse Arene Sandwich Structures Based upon π‐Hole⋅⋅⋅[MII] (d8 M=Pt,Pd) Interactions,where Positively Charged Metal Centers Play the Role of a Nucleophile

The complexes [Pt(tpp)] (H₂tpp=tetraphenylporphyrin), [M(acac)₂] (M=Pd, Pt, Hacac=acetylacetone), and [Pd(ba)₂] (Hba=benzoylacetone) were co‐crystallized with highly electron‐deficient arene systems to form reverse arene sandwich structures built by π‐hole???[M^II] (d⁸M=Pt, Pd) interactions. The adduct [Pt(tpp)]?2 C₆F₆ is monomeric, whereas the diketonate 1:1 adducts form columnar infinity 1D‐stack assembled by simultaneous action of both π‐hole???[M^II] and C???F interactions. The reverse sandwiches are based on noncovalent interactions and calculated ESP distributions indicate that in π‐hole???[M^II] contacts, [M^II] plays the role of a nucleophile.     

Platinum Complexes of a Borane‐Appended Analogue of 1,1′‐Bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene: Flexible Borane Coordination Modes and in situ Vinylborane Formation

A bis(phosphine)borane ambiphilic ligand, [Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄PPh₂)(η⁵‐C₅H₄PtBu{C₆H₄(BPh₂)‐ortho})] (FcPPB), in which the borane occupies a terminal position, was prepared. Reaction of FcPPB with tris(norbornene)platinum(0) provided [Pt(FcPPB)] ( 1 ) in which the arylborane is η³BCC‐coordinated. Subsequent reaction with CO and CNXyl (Xyl=2,6‐dimethylphenyl) afforded [PtL(FcPPB)] {L=CO ( 2 ) and CNXyl ( 3 )} featuring η²BC‐ and η¹B‐arylborane coordination modes, respectively. Reaction of 1 or 2 with H₂ yielded [PtH(μ‐H)(FcPPB)] in which the borane is bound to a hydride ligand on platinum. Addition of PhC₂H to [Pt(FcPPB)] afforded [Pt(C₂Ph)(μ‐H)(FcPPB)] ( 5 ), which rapidly converted to [Pt(FcPPB′)] ( 6 ; FcPPB′=[Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄PPh₂)(η⁵‐C₅H₄PtBu{C₆H₄(BPh‐CPh=CHPh‐Z)‐ortho}]) in which the newly formed vinylborane is η³BCC‐coordinated. Unlike arylborane complex 1 , vinylborane complex 6 does not react with CO, CNXyl, H₂ or HC₂Ph at room temperature.     

π–π Dimerization of a mono(pyridyl–imine) platinum(II) chelate

The cation of the title complex salt, chlorido{2,2‐dimethyl‐N‐[(E)‐1‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)ethylidene]propane‐1,3‐diamine}platinum(II) tetrafluoridoborate, [PtCl(C₁₂H₁₉N₃)]BF₄, exhibits a nominally square‐planar Pt^II ion coordinated to a chloride ion [Pt—Cl = 2.3046 (9) Å] and three unique N‐atom types, viz. pyridine, imine and amine, of the tridentate Schiff base ligand formed by the 1:1 condensation of 1‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)ethanone and 2,2‐dimethylpropane‐1,3‐diamine. The cations are π‐stacked in inversion‐related pairs (dimers), with a mean plane separation of 3.426 Å, an intradimer Pt...Pt separation of 5.0785 (6) Å and a lateral shift of 3.676 Å. The centroid (Cg) of the pyridine ring is positioned approximately over the Pt^II ion of the neighbouring cation (Pt...Cg = 3.503 Å).     

Control over the Self‐Assembly Modes of PtII Complexes by Alkyl Chain Variation: From Slipped to Parallel π‐Stacks

We report the self‐assembly of a new family of hydrophobic, bis(pyridyl) Pt^II complexes featuring an extended oligophenyleneethynylene‐derived π‐surface appended with six long (dodecyloxy ( 2 )) or short (methoxy ( 3 )) side groups. Complex 2 , containing dodecyloxy chains, forms fibrous assemblies with a slipped arrangement of the monomer units (d_Pt???Pt≈14 Å) in both nonpolar solvents and the solid state. Dispersion‐corrected PM6 calculations suggest that this organization is driven by cooperative π–π, C?H???Cl and π–Pt interactions, which is supported by EXAFS and 2D NMR spectroscopic analysis. In contrast, nearly parallel π‐stacks (d_Pt???Pt≈4.4 Å) stabilized by multiple π–π and C?H???Cl contacts are obtained in the crystalline state for 3 lacking long side chains, as shown by X‐ray analysis and PM6 calculations. Our results reveal not only the key role of alkyl chain length in controlling self‐assembly modes but also show the relevance of Pt‐bound chlorine ligands as new supramolecular synthons.     

Construction of Hetero‐Four‐Layered Tripalladium(II) Cyclophanes by Transannular π⋅⋅⋅π Interactions

A synthetic strategy for the generation of new molecular species utilizing a provision of nature is presented. Nano‐dimensional (23(2)×21(1)×16(1) ų) hetero‐four‐layered trimetallacyclophanes were constructed by proof‐of‐concept experiments that utilize a suitable combination of π???π interactions between the central aromatic rings, tailor‐made short/long spacer tridentate donors, and the combined helicity. The behavior of the unprecedented four‐layered metallacyclophane system offers a landmark in the development of new molecular systems.     

A Crystallographic Charge Density Study of the Partial Covalent Nature of Strong N⋅⋅⋅Br Halogen Bonds

The covalent nature of strong N?Br???N halogen bonds in a cocrystal ( 2 ) of N‐bromosuccinimide ( NBS ) with 3,5‐dimethylpyridine ( lut ) was determined from X‐ray charge density studies and compared to a weak N?Br???O halogen bond in pure crystalline NBS ( 1 ) and a covalent bond in bis(3‐methylpyridine)bromonium cation (in its perchlorate salt ( 3 ). In 2 , the donor N?Br bond is elongated by 0.0954 Å, while the Br???acceptor distance of 2.3194(4) is 1.08 Å shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii. A maximum electron density of 0.38 e Å^?3 along the Br???N halogen bond indicates a considerable covalent contribution to the total interaction. This value is intermediate to 0.067 e Å^?3 for the Br???O contact in 1 , and approximately 0.7 e Å^?3 in both N?Br bonds of the bromonium cation in 3 . A calculation of the natural bond order charges of the contact atoms, and the σ*(N1?Br) population of NBS as a function of distance between NBS and lut , have shown that charge transfer becomes significant at a Br???N distance below about 3 Å.     

Influence of the Li⋅⋅⋅π Interaction on the H/X⋅⋅⋅π Interactions in HOLi⋅⋅⋅C6H6⋅⋅⋅HOX/XOH (X=F,Cl, Br,I) Complexes

The influences of the Li???π interaction of C₆H₆???LiOH on the H???π interaction of C₆H₆???HOX (X=F, Cl, Br, I) and the X???π interaction of C₆H₆???XOH (X=Cl, Br, I) are investigated by means of full electronic second‐order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory calculations and “quantum theory of atoms in molecules” (QTAIM) studies. The binding energies, binding distances, infrared vibrational frequencies, and electron densities at the bond critical points (BCPs) of the hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds prove that the addition of the Li???π interaction to benzene weakens the H???π and X???π interactions. The influences of the Li???π interaction on H???π interactions are greater than those on X???π interactions; the influences of the H???π interactions on the Li???π interaction are greater than X???π interactions on Li???π interaction. The greater the influence of Li???π interaction on H/X???π interactions, the greater the influences of H/X???π interactions on Li???π interaction. QTAIM studies show that the intermolecular interactions of C₆H₆???HOX and C₆H₆???XOH are mainly of the π type. The electron densities at the BCPs of hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds decrease on going from bimolecular complexes to termolecular complexes, and the π‐electron densities at the BCPs show the same pattern. Natural bond orbital analyses show that the Li???π interaction reduces electron transfer from C₆H₆ to HOX and XOH.     

Short but Weak: The Z‐DNA Lone‐Pair⋅⋅⋅π Conundrum Challenges Standard Carbon Van der Waals Radii

Current interest in lone‐pair???π (lp???π) interactions is gaining momentum in biochemistry and (supramolecular) chemistry. However, the physicochemical origin of the exceptionally short (ca. 2.8 Å) oxygen‐to‐nucleobase plane distances observed in prototypical Z‐DNA CpG steps remains unclear. High‐level quantum mechanical calculations, including SAPT2+3 interaction energy decompositions, demonstrate that lp???π contacts do not result from n→π* orbital overlaps but from weak dispersion and electrostatic interactions combined with stereochemical effects imposed by the locally strained structural context. They also suggest that the carbon van der Waals (vdW) radii, originally derived for sp³ carbons, should not be used for smaller sp² carbons attached to electron‐withdrawing groups. Using a more adapted carbon vdW radius results in these lp???π contacts being no longer of the sub‐vdW type. These findings challenge the whole lp???π concept that refers to elusive orbital interactions that fail to explain short interatomic contact distances.     

A Platinum(II) Terpyridine Metallogel with an L‐Valine‐Modified Alkynyl Ligand: Interplay of Pt⋅⋅⋅Pt, π–π and Hydrogen‐Bonding Interactions

A series of platinum(II) terpyridine complexes with L ‐valine‐modified alkynyl ligands has been synthesized. A complex with an unsubstituted terpyridine and one valine unit on the alkynyl is shown to be capable of gel formation, which is in sharp contrast to the gelation properties of the corresponding organic counterparts. Upon sol–gel transition, a drastic color change from yellow to red is observed, which is indicative of the involvement of Pt ??? Pt interactions. Through the concentration‐ and temperature‐dependent UV/Vis absorption, emission, circular dichroism, and ¹H NMR studies, the contribution of hydrogen bonding, Pt ??? Pt and π–π stacking interactions as driving forces for gelation have been established, and the importance of maintaining a delicate balance between different intermolecular forces has also been illustrated.     

Self‐Assembly of Dialkyltin Moieties and Mercaptobenzoic Acid into Macrocyclic Complexes with Hydrophobic “Pseudo‐Cage” or Double‐Cavity Structures: Supramolecular Infrastructures Involving Intermolecular C?H⋅⋅⋅S Weak Hydrogen Bonds and π–π Interactions

Four novel organotin complexes of two types—[R₂Sn(o‐SC₆H₄CO₂)]₆ (R=Me, 1 ?H₂O; nBu, 2 ) and {[R₂Sn(m‐CO₂C₆H₄S)R₂Sn(m‐SC₆H₄CO₂)SnR₂]O}₂ (R=Me, 3 ; nBu, 4 )—have been prepared by treatment of o‐ or m‐mercaptobenzoic acid and the corresponding R₂SnCl₂ (R=Me, nBu) with sodium ethoxide in ethanol (95 %). All the complexes were characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR and NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn) spectroscopy, TGA, and X‐ray crystallography diffraction analysis. The molecular structure analyses reveal that both 1 and 2 are hexanuclear macrocycles with hydrophobic “pseudo‐cage” structures, while 3 and 4 are hexanuclear macrocycles with double‐cavity structures. Furthermore, the supramolecular structure analyses show that looser and more intriguing supramolecular infrastructures were also found in complexes 1 – 4 , which exist either as one‐dimensional chains of rings or as two‐dimensional networks assembled from the organometallic subunits through intermolecular C? H???S weak hydrogen bonds (WHBs) and π–π interactions.     

Crystal structures and spectroscopic characterization of MBr2(CNXyl)n (M = Fe and Co,n = 4; M = Ni,n = 2; Xyl = 2,6‐dimethylphenyl), and of formally zero‐valent iron as a cocrystal of Fe(CNXyl)5 and Fe2(CNXyl)9

Structures and spectroscopic characterization of the divalent complexes cis‐dibromidotetrakis(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)iron(II) dichloromethane 0.771‐solvate, [FeBr₂(C₉H₉N)₄]·0.771CH₂Cl₂ or cis‐FeBr₂(CNXyl)₄·0.771CH₂Cl₂ (Xyl = 2,6‐dimethylphenyl), trans‐dibromidotetrakis(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)iron(II), [FeBr₂(C₉H₉N)₄] or trans‐FeBr₂(CNXyl)₄, trans‐dibromidotetrakis(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)cobalt(II), [CoBr₂(C₉H₉N)₄] or trans‐CoBr₂(CNXyl)₄, and trans‐dibromidobis(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)nickel(II), [NiBr₂(C₉H₉N)₂] or trans‐NiBr₂(CNXyl)₂, are presented. Additionally, crystals grown from a cold diethyl ether solution of zero‐valent Fe(CNXyl)₅ produced a structure containing a cocrystallization of mononuclear Fe(CNXyl)₅ and the previously unknown dinuclear [Fe(CNXyl)₃]₂(μ₂‐CNXyl)₃, namely pentakis(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)iron(0) tris(μ₂‐2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)bis[tris(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)iron(0)], [Fe(C₉H₉N)₅][Fe₂(C₉H₉N)₉]. The (M)C—N—C(Xyl) angles of the isocyanide ligand are nearly linear for the metals in the +2 oxidation state, for which the ligands function essentially as pure donors. The νCN stretching frequencies for these divalent metal isocyanides are at or above that of the free ligand. Relative to Fe^II, in the structure containing iron in the formally zero‐valent oxidation state, the Fe—C bond lengths have shortened, the C[triple‐bond]N bond lengths have elongated, the (M)C—N—C(Xyl) angles of the terminal CNXyl ligands are more bent, and the νCN stretching frequencies have shifted to lower energies, all indicative of substantial M(dπ)→π* backbonding.     

A New Conformation With an Extraordinarily Long, 3.04 Å Two‐Electron,Six‐Center Bond Observed for the π‐[TCNE]22− Dimer in [NMe4]2[TCNE]2 (TCNE=Tetracyanoethylene)

[NMe₄]₂[TCNE]₂ (TCNE=tetracyanoethenide) formed from the reaction of TCNE and (NMe₄)CN in MeCN has ν_CN IR absorptions at 2195, 2191, 2172, and 2156 cm^?1 and a ν_CC absorption at 1383 cm^?1 that are characteristic of reduced TCNE. The TCNEs have an average central C?C distance of 1.423 Å that is also characteristic of reduced TCNE. The reduced TCNE forms a previously unknown non‐eclipsed, centrosymmetric π‐[TCNE]₂^2? dimer with nominal C₂ symmetry, 12 sub van der Waals interatomic contacts <3.3 Å, a central intradimer separation of 3.039(3) Å, and comparable intradimer C???N distances of 3.050(3) and 2.984(3) Å. The two pairs of central C???C atoms form a ?C?C???C?C of 112.6° that is substantially greater than the 0° observed for the eclipsed D_2h π‐[TCNE]₂^2? dimer possessing a two‐electron, four‐center (2e^?/4c) bond with two C???C components from a molecular orbital (MO) analysis. A MO study combining CAS(2,2)/MRMP2/cc‐pVTZ and atoms‐in‐molecules (AIM) calculations indicates that the non‐eclipsed, C₂ π‐[TCNE]₂^2? dimer exhibits a new type of a long, intradimer bond involving one strong C???C and two weak C???N components, that is, a 2e^?/6c bond. The C₂ π‐[TCNE]₂^2? conformer has a singlet, diamagnetic ground state with a thermally populated triplet excited state with J/k_B=1000 K (700 cm^?1; 86.8 meV; 2.00 kcal mol^?1; H=?2 JS_a?S_b); at the CAS(2,2)/MBMP2 level the triplet is computed to be 9.0 kcal mol^?1 higher in energy than the closed‐shell singlet ground state. The results from CAS(2,2)/NEVPT2/cc‐pVTZ calculations indicate that the C₂ and D_2h conformers have two different local metastable minima with the C₂ conformer being 1.3 kcal mol^?1 less stable. The different natures of the C₂ and D_2h conformers are also noted from the results of valence bond (VB) qualitative diagram that shows a 10e^?/6c bond with one C???C and two C???N bonding components for the C₂ conformer as compared to the 6e^?/4c bond for the D_2h conformer with two C???C bonding components.     

Aktivierung von Schwefelkohlenstoff an Trirutheniumclustern: Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [Ru3(CO)5(μ‐H)2(μ‐PCy2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2){μ‐η2‐PCy2C(S)}(μ3‐S)] und [Ru3(CO)5(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐PCy2)2(μ3‐S)]

Activation of Carbon Disulfide on Triruthenium Clusters: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structure Analysis of [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] and [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] [Ru₃(CO)₆(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) reacts under mild conditions with CS₂ and yields by oxidative decarbonylation and insertion of CS into one phosphido bridge the opened 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐dppm){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] ( 2 ) with only two M–M bonds. The compound 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; α = 84.65(3), β = 77.21(3), γ = 81.87(3)° and V = 2790.7(11) ų. The reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₇(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂] ( 3 ) with CS₂ in refluxing toluene affords the 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] ( 4 ). The compound cristallizes in the monoclinic space group P 2₁/a with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; β = 104.223(16)° and V = 4570.9(10) ų. Although in the solid state structure one elongated Ru–Ru bond has been found the complex 4 can be considered by means of the ³¹P‐NMR data as an electron‐rich metal cluster.     

Cooperativity between the Halogen Bond and the Hydrogen Bond in H3N⋅⋅⋅XY⋅⋅⋅HF Complexes (X,Y=F,Cl, Br)

Ab initio calculations are used to provide information on H₃N???XY???HF triads (X, Y=F, Cl, Br) each having a halogen bond and a hydrogen bond. The investigated triads include H₃N???Br₂‐HF, H₃N???Cl₂???HF, H₃N???BrCI???HF, H₃N???BrF???HF, and H₃N???ClF???HF. To understand the properties of the systems better, the corresponding dyads are also investigated. Molecular geometries, binding energies, and infrared spectra of monomers, dyads, and triads are studied at the MP2 level of theory with the 6‐311++G(d,p) basis set. Because the primary aim of this study is to examine cooperative effects, particular attention is given to parameters such as cooperative energies, many‐body interaction energies, and cooperativity factors. The cooperative energy ranges from ?1.45 to ?4.64 kcal mol^?1, the three‐body interaction energy from ?2.17 to ?6.71 kcal mol^?1, and the cooperativity factor from 1.27 to 4.35. These results indicate significant cooperativity between the halogen and hydrogen bonds in these complexes. This cooperativity is much greater than that between hydrogen bonds. The effect of a halogen bond on a hydrogen bond is more pronounced than that of a hydrogen bond on a halogen bond.     

The Role of Molecular Electrostatic Potentials in the Formation of a Halogen Bond in Furan⋅⋅⋅XY and Thiophene⋅⋅⋅XY Complexes

The halogen bonding of furan???XY and thiophene???XY (X=Cl, Br; Y=F, Cl, Br), involving σ‐ and π‐type interactions, was studied by using MP2 calculations and quantum theory of “atoms in molecules” (QTAIM) studies. The negative electrostatic potentials of furan and thiophene, as well as the most positive electrostatic potential (V_S,max) on the surface of the interacting X atom determined the geometries of the complexes. Linear relationships were found between interaction energy and V_S,max of the X atom, indicating that electrostatic interactions play an important role in these halogen‐bonding interactions. The halogen‐bonding interactions in furan???XY and thiophene???XY are weak, “closed‐shell” noncovalent interactions. The linear relationship of topological properties, energy properties, and the integration of interatomic surfaces versus V_S,max of atom X demonstrate the importance of the positive σ hole, as reflected by the computed V_S,max of atom X, in determining the topological properties of the halogen bonds.     

Theoretical Investigation on the Effect of Different Nitrogen Donors on Intramolecular Se⋅⋅⋅N Interactions

The effect of different donor nitrogen atoms on the strength and nature of intramolecular Se ??? N interactions is evaluated for organoselenium compounds having N,N‐dimethylaminomethyl (dime), oxazoline (oxa) and pyridyl (py) substituents. Quantum chemical calculations on three series of compounds [2‐(dime)C₆H₄SeX ( 1 a – g ), 2‐(oxa)C₆H₄SeX ( 2 a – g ), 2‐(py)C₆H₄SeX ( 3 a – g ); X=Cl, Br, OH, CN, SPh, SePh, CH₃] at the B3LYP/6‐31G(d) level show that the stability of different conformers depends on the strength of intramolecular nonbonded Se ??? N interactions. Natural bond orbital (NBO), NBO deletion and atoms in molecules (AIM) analyses suggest that the nature of the Se ??? N interaction is predominantly covalent and involves nN→σ*_{Se? X} orbital interaction. In the three series of compounds, the strength of the Se ??? N interaction decreases in the order 3 > 2 > 1 for a particular X, and it decreases in the order Cl>Br>OH>SPh≈CN≈SePh>CH₃ for all the three series 1 – 3 . However, further analyses suggest that the differences in strength of Se ??? N interaction in 1 – 3 is predominantly determined by the distance between the Se and N atoms, which in turn is an outcome of specific structures of 1 , 2 and 3 , and the nature of the donor nitrogen atoms involved has very little effect on the strength of Se ??? N interaction. It is also observed that Se ??? N interaction becomes stronger in polar solvents such as CHCl₃, as indicated by the shorter r_{Se ??? N} and higher E_{Se ??? N} values in CHCl₃ compared to those observed in the gas phase.