On the integer points on some special hyper-elliptic curves over a finite field

If $\text{l}$_r(p) is the least positive integral value of x for which y² ≡ x(x + 1) ? (x + r ? 1)(modp) has a solution, we conjecture that $\text{l}$_r(p) ≤ r² ? r + 1 with equality for infinitely many primes p. A proof is sketched for r = 5. A further generalization to y² ≡ (x + a₁) ? (x + a_r) is suggested, where the a's are fixed positive integers.     

Valeurs aux entiers négatifs des séries de Dirichlet associées a un polynôme,I

In this paper, we are studying Dirichlet series Z(P,ξ,s) = Σ_n?$\text{N}$^1rP(n)^?s ξⁿ, where P ∈ $\text{R}$₊ [X₁,…,X_r] and ξⁿ = ξ₁ⁿ¹ … ξ_r^nr, with ξ_i ∈ $\text{C}$, such that |ξ_i| = 1 and ξ_i ≠ 1, 1 ≦ i ≦ r. We show that Z(P, ξ,·) can be continued holomorphically to the whole complex plane, and that the values Z(P, ξ, ?k) for all non negative integers, belong to the field generated over $\text{Q}$ by the ξ_i and the coefficients of P. If, there exists a number field K, containing the ξ_i, 1 ≦ i ≦ r, and the coefficients of P, then we study the denominators of Z(P, ξ, ?k) and we define a $\text{B}$-adic function Z$\text{B}$(P, ξ,·) which is equal, on class of negative integers, to Z(P, ξ, ?k).     

An identity involving partitional generalized binomial coefficients

Define coefficients (_κ^λ) by C_λ(I_p + Z)/C_λ(I_p) = Σ_k=0^l Σ_{?∈$\text{P}$k} (_?^λ) C_κ(Z)/C_κ(I_p), where the C_λ's are zonal polynomials in p by p matrices. It is shown that C_?(Z) etr(Z)/k! = Σ_l=k^∞ Σ_{λ∈$\text{P}$l} (_?^λ) C_λ(Z)/l!. This identity is extended to analogous identities involving generalized Laguerre, Hermite, and other polynomials. Explicit expressions are given for all (_?^λ), ? ∈ $\text{P}$_k, k ≤ 3. Several identities involving the (_?^λ)'s are derived. These are used to derive explicit expressions for coefficients of $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(Z)}\text{l}\text{!}$ in expansions of P(Z), $\text{etr}\text{(Z)}\text{k!}$ for all monomials P(Z) in s_j = tr Z^j of degree k ≤ 5.     

On the probability that k positive integers are relatively prime II

Given a set S of positive integers let $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t)}$ denote the number of k-tuples 〈m₁, …, m_k〉 for which $\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{∈ S ? [1, t]}$ and (m₁, …, m_k) = 1. Also let $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n)}$ denote the probability that k integers, chosen at random from $\text{S ? [1, n]}$, are relatively prime. It is shown that if P = {p₁, …, p_r} is a finite set of primes and S = {m : (m, p₁ … p_r) = 1}, then $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{\nu ?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + O(t}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{)}$ if k ≥ 3 and $\text{Z}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^2\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^2\text{) + O(t}\text{log}\text{t)}$ where d(S) denotes the natural density of S. From this result it follows immediately that $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = (ζ(k))}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p\in P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ as n → ∞. This result generalizes an earlier result of the author's where $\text{P = ?}$ and S is then the whole set of positive integers. It is also shown that if S = {p₁^x₁ … p_r^x_r : x_i = 0, 1, 2,…}, then $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → 0}$ as n → ∞.     

A general approach to optimal control of a regression experiment

Let $\text{θ}\text{θ}\text{?}$ = ($\text{θ}\text{θ}\text{?}$₁, $\text{θ}\text{θ}\text{?}$₂, …, $\text{θ}\text{θ}\text{?}$_n)′ be the least-squares estimator of θ = (θ₁, θ₂, …, θ_n)′ by the realization of the process y(t) = Σ_{k = 1}ⁿθ_kf_k(t) + ξ(t) on the interval T = [a, b] with f = (f₁, f₂, …, f_n)′ belonging to a certain set X. The process satisfies E(ξ(t))≡0 and has known continuous covariance r(s, t) = E(ξ(s)ξ(t)) on T × T. In this paper, A-, D-, and D_s-optimality are used as criteria for choosing f in X. A-, D-, and D_s-optimal models can be constructed explicitly by means of r.     

On the first case of Fermat's last theorem

Let p be an odd prime and suppose that for some a, b, c ? $\text{Z}$\p$\text{Z}$ we have that a^p + b^p + c^p = 0. In Part I a simple new expression and a simple proof of the congruences of Mirimanoff which appeared in his papers of 1910 and 1911 are given. As is known, these congruences have Wieferich and Mirimanoff criteria (2^{p ? 1} ≡ 1 mod p² and 3^{p ? 1} ≡ 1 mod p²) as immediate consequences. Mirimanoff's congruences are expressed in the form of polynomial congruences $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{m}}\text{(}\text{?a}\text{b}\text{) ≡ 0}\text{mod}\text{p}$, 1 ≤ m ≤ p ? 1, and these polynomials P_m(X) are characterized by means of simple relations. In Part II a complement to Kummer-Mirimanoff congruences is given under the hypothesis that p does not divide the second factor of the class number of the p-cyclotomic field.     

Hecke operators and an identity for the dedekind sums

If h, k ∈ Z, k > 0, the Dedekind sum is given by

$\text{s(h,k) =}\text{∑}\text{μ=1}\text{k}\text{μ}\text{k}\text{hμ}\text{k}$

, with

$\text{((x)) = x ? [x] ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{, x?Z}$

,

$\text{=0 , x∈Z}$

. The Hecke operators T_n for the full modular group SL(2, Z) are applied to log η(τ) to derive the identities (n ∈ Z⁺)

$\text{∑ ∑ s(ah+bk,dk) = σ(n)s(h,k)}$

,

$\text{ad=n b(}\text{mod}\text{d)}$

$\text{d>0}$

where (h, k) = 1, k > 0 and σ(n) is the sum of the positive divisors of n. Petersson had earlier proved (1) under the additional assumption k ≡ 0, h ≡ 1 (mod n). Dedekind himself proved (1) when n is prime.     

A note on the least prime in an arithmetic progression

Let k, l denote positive integers with (k, l) = 1. Denote by p(k, l) the least prime p ≡ l(mod k). Let P(k) be the maximum value of p(k, l) for all l. We show $\text{lim inf}\text{P(k)}\text{(?(k)}\text{log}\text{k)}\text{≥ e}{}^{\mathrm{\gamma }}\text{= 1.78107…}$, where γ is Euler's constant and ? is Euler's function. We also show $\text{P(k)}\text{(?(k)}\text{log}\text{k)}\text{→ ∞}$ for almost all k.     

Partitions of large multipartites with congruence conditions. II

For 1 ≦ l ≦ j, let $\text{a}$_l = ?_h=1^q(l){a_lh + Mv: v = 0, 1, 2,…}, where j, M, q(l) and the a_lh are positive integers such that j > 1, a_l1 < … < a_lq(2) ≦ M, and let $\text{a}$_l^′ = $\text{a}$_l ∪ {0}. Let p(n : $\text{B}$) be the number of partitions of n = (n₁,…,n_j) where, for 1 ≦ l ≦ j, the lth component of each part belongs to $\text{B}$_l and let p¹(n : $\text{B}$) be the number of partitions of n into different parts where again the lth component of each part belongs to $\text{B}$_l. Asymptotic formulas are obtained for p(n : $\text{a}$), p¹(n : $\text{a}$) where all but one n_l tend to infinity much more rapidly than that n_l, and asymptotic formulas are also obtained for p(n : $\text{a}$′), p¹(n ; $\text{a}$′), where one n_l tends to infinity much more rapidly than every other n_l. These formulas contrast with those of a recent paper (Robertson and Spencer, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear) in which all the n_l tend to infinity at approximately the same rate.     

The probability that k positive integers are relatively r-prime

If r, k are positive integers, then $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples of positive integers (x₁, x₂, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r = 1. An explicit formula for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ is derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{ζ(rk)}$.If S = {p₁, p₂, …, p_a} is a finite set of primes, then 〈S〉 = {p₁^a₁p₂^a₂…p_s^a_s; p_i ∈ S and a_i ≥ 0 for all i} and $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples (x₁, x₃, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r ∈ 〈S〉. Asymptotic formulas for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ are derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(p}{}_1\text{… p}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{ζ(rk)(p}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1) … (p}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1)}$.     

On admissible shifts of generalized white noises

Let $\text{S}$ be the Schwartz space of rapidly decreasing real functions. The dual space $\text{S}$¹ consists of the tempered distributions and the relation $\text{S}$ ? L²($\text{R}$) ? $\text{S}$¹ holds. Let γ be the Gaussian white noise on $\text{S}$¹ with the characteristic functional $\text{γ}\text{(ξ) =}\text{exp}\text{{?∥ξ∥}{}^2\text{/2}}$, ξ ∈ $\text{S}$, where ∥·∥ is the L²($\text{R}$)-norm. Let ν be the Poisson white noise on $\text{S}$¹ with the characteristic functional $\text{ν}\text{(ξ)}$ = exp?_$\text{R}$∫_$\text{R}$ {[exp(iξ(t)u)] ? 1 ? (1 + u²)^?1(iξ(t)u)} dη(u)dt), ξ ∈ $\text{S}$, where the Lévy measure is assumed to satisfy the condition ∫_$\text{R}$u²dη(u) < ∞. It is proved that γ1ν has the same dichotomy property for shifts as the Gaussian white noise, i.e., for any ω ∈ $\text{S}$¹, the shift $\text{(γ1ν)}{}_{\mathrm{\omega }}$ of γ1ν by ω and γ1ν are either equivalent or orthogonal. They are equivalent if and only if when ω ∈ L²($\text{R}$) and the Radon-Nikodym derivative is derived. It is also proved that for the Poisson white noice ν_ω is orthogonal to ν for any non-zero ω in $\text{S}$¹.     

A completeness theorem for a nonlinear multiparameter eigenvalue problem

In this paper we study the linked nonlinear multiparameter system

$\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{r}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(X}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{) + M}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{+}\text{∑}\text{s=1}\text{k}\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{rs}}\text{(X}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{) + P}{}_{\mathrm{rs}}\text{) Y}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{(X}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{) = 0, r = l,…, k}$

, where x_r? [a_r, b_r], y_r is subject to Sturm-Liouville boundary conditions, and the continuous functions a_rs satisfy ¦ $\text{A ¦ (x) =}\text{det}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{rs}}\text{(x}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{) > 0}$. Conditions on the polynomial operators M_r, P_rs are produced which guarantee a sequence of eigenfunctions for this problem yⁿ(x) = Π_r=1^ky_rⁿ(x_r), n ? 1, which form a basis in $\text{L}{}^2\text{([a, b], ¦ A ¦)}$. Here [a, b] = [a₁, b₁ × … × [a_k, b_k].     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

A note on character sums

Let $\text{S(k) = Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{p?1}}\text{(}\text{n}\text{p}\text{)n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$ where p is a prime ≡ 3 mod 4 and k is an integer ≥ 3. Then S(k) frequently takes large values of each sign.     

On the maximum number of permutations with given maximal or minimal distance

Let us denote by R(k, ? λ)[R(k, ? λ)] the maximal number $\text{M}$ such that there exist $\text{M}$ different permutations of the set {1,…, k} such that any two of them have at least λ (at most λ, respectively) common positions. We prove the inequalities R(k, ? λ) ? kR(k ? 1, ? λ ? 1), R(k, ? λ) ? R(k, ? λ ? 1) ? k!, R(k, ? λ) ? kR(k ? 1, ? λ ? 1). We show: R(k, ? k ? 2) = 2, R(k, ? 1) = (k ? 1)!, R(p^m, ? 2) = (p^m ? 2)!, R(p^m + 1, ? 3) = (p^m ? 2)!, $\text{R(k, ? k ? 3) =}\text{k!}\text{2}$, R(k, ? 0) = k, R(p^m, ? 1) = p^m(p^m ? 1), R(p^m + 1, ? 2) = (p^m + 1)p^m(p^m ? 1). The exact value of R(k, ? λ) is determined whenever k ? k₀(k ? λ); we conjecture that R(k, ? λ) = (k ? λ)! for k ? k₀(λ). Bounds for the general case are given and are used to determine that the minimum of |R(k, ? λ) ? R(k, ? λ)| is attained for $\text{λ = (}\text{k}\text{2}\text{) + O(}\text{k}\text{log}\text{k}\text{)}$.     

On solutions of “equations in symmetric groups”

Let x?S_n, the symmetric group on n symbols. Let θ? Aut(S_n) and let the automorphim order of x with respect to θ be defined by

$\text{γθ(x)=}\text{min}\text{{k:x xθ xθ}{}^2\text{? xθ}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{=1}}$

where xθ is the image of x under θ. Let α_g? Aut(S_n) denote conjugation by the element g?S_n. Let where s and k are positive integers and $\text{a}\text{b}$ denotes a divides b. Further h(s, k : n) ≡ b(1; s, k : n), where 1 denotes the identity automorphim. If g?S_n let c = f(g, s) denote the number of symbols in g which are in cycles of length not dividing the integer s, and let g_s denote the product of all cycles in g whose lengths do not divide s. Then g_s moves c symbols. The main results proved are: (1) recursion: if n ? c + 1 and t = n ? c ? 1 then $\text{b(g; s, 1:n)=∑}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>i</mtext><mtext>s</mtext>}}\text{b(g; s, 1:n?1)(}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(i?1)!}$ (2) reduction: b(g; s, 1 : c)h(s, 1 : i) = b(g; s, 1 : i + c); (3) distribution: let D(θ, n) ≡ {(k, b) : k?Z⁺ and b = b(θ; 1, k : n) ≠ 0}; then D(θ, m) = D(φ, m) ∨ m ? N = N(θ, φ) iff θ is conjugate to φ; (4) evaluation: the number of cycles in g_s^s of any given length is smaller than the smallest prime dividing s iff b(g_s; s, 1 : c) = 1. If g = (12 … p^m)^t and $\text{sk}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$ then $\text{b(g;s,k:p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{) {}{}^0{}_{\mathrm{\pm 1}}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{p)}$.     

Rationale approximation mit Hilfe pythagoräischer Zahlen

The wealth of Pythagorean number triples is demonstrated afresh by showing that for every rational number $\text{p}\text{q}$, p, q ∈ $\text{N}$ there exist infinitely many Pythagorean number triples (a, b, c) which satisfy

$\text{|}\text{a}\text{b}\text{?}\text{p}\text{q}\text{| ?}\text{1}\text{b}$

where a is odd, b is even and a² + b² = c². The special cases where p = 1 or where q = 1 are considered first as they illustrate the method and yield additional results. Rational approximations are also possible by means of the quotients $\text{c}\text{b}$, provided p > q. The results generalize Pythagorean number triples (a, b, c) where a and b differ by a constant investigated by S. Pignataro.     

On the zeros of exponential polynomials

Suppose r = (r₁, …, r_M), r_j ? 0, γ_kj ? 0 integers, k = 1, 2, …, N, j = 1, 2, …, M, γ_k · r = ∑_jγ_kjr_j. The purpose of this paper is to study the behavior of the zeros of the function h(λ, a, r) = 1 + ∑_{j = 1}^Na_je^{?λγ_j · r}, where each a_j is a nonzero real number. More specifically, if $\text{Z}\text{?}\text{(a, r) =}\text{closure}\text{{}\text{Re}\text{λ: h(λ, a, r) = 0}}$, we study the dependence of $\text{Z}\text{?}\text{(a, r)}\text{on}\text{a, r}$. This set is continuous in a but generally not in r. However, it is continuous in r if the components of r are rationally independent. Specific criterion to determine when $\text{0 ?}\text{Z}\text{?}\text{(a, r)}$ are given. Several examples illustrate the complicated nature of $\text{Z}\text{?}\text{(a, r)}$. The results have immediate implication to the theory of stability for difference equations x(t) ? ∑_{k = 1}^MA_kx(t ? r_k) = 0, where x is an n-vector, since the characteristic equation has the form given by h(λ, a, r). The results give information about the preservation of stability with respect to variations in the delays. The results also are fundamental for a discussion of the dependence of solutions of neutral differential difference equations on the delays. These implications will appear elsewhere.     

On differences and sums of integers,I

A set {b₁,b₂,…,b_i} ? {1,2,…,N} is said to be a difference intersector set if {a₁,a₂,…,a_s} ? {1,2,…,N}, j > ?N imply the solvability of the equation a_x ? a_y = b′; the notion of sum intersector set is defined similarly. The authors prove two general theorems saying that if a set {b₁,b₂,…,b_i} is well distributed simultaneously among and within all residue classes of small moduli then it must be both difference and sum intersector set. They apply these theorems to investigate the solvability of the equations ($\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{?}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{p}\text{= + 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{u}}\text{?}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{p}\text{) = ? 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{+}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{p}\text{) = + 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{+}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{z}}\text{p}\text{) = ? 1}$ (where ($\text{a}\text{p}$) denotes the Legendre symbol) and to show that “almost all” sets form both difference and sum intersector sets.