An Investigation of Relationships between Seventh-Grade Students' Beliefs and Their Participation during Mathematics Discussions in Two Classrooms

As mathematics teachers attempt to promote classroom discourse that emphasizes reasoning about mathematical concepts and supports students' development of mathematical autonomy, not all students will participate similarly. For the purposes of this research report, I examined how 15 seventh-grade students participated during whole-class discussions in two mathematics classrooms. Additionally, I interpreted the nature of students' participation in relation to their beliefs about participating in whole-class discussions, extending results reported previously (Jansen, 2006) about a wider range of students' beliefs and goals in discussion-oriented mathematics classrooms. Students who believed mathematics discussions were threatening avoided talking about mathematics conceptually across both classrooms, yet these students participated by talking about mathematics procedurally. In addition, students' beliefs about appropriate behavior during mathematics class appeared to constrain whether they critiqued solutions of their classmates in both classrooms. Results suggest that coordinating analyses of students' beliefs and participation, particularly focusing on students who participate outside of typical interaction patterns in a classroom, can provide insights for engaging more students in mathematics classroom discussions.     

How do domains of knowledge integrate into mathematics teachers’ practice?

This study is a part of a research project that seeks to characterize the relationship between mathematics teachers’ knowledge and their practice. In this paper, we focus on identifying the characteristics of subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge that two teachers integrate in decisions they make about the introduction of specific mathematical content. Then, we examine the changes that arise in their classrooms as their plans are put in action. Data were obtained through audiotapes of several semi-structured interviews, through observations, and through videotapes. Although the two teachers in this study had similar backgrounds and experiences, our analysis shows differences in the characteristics of the domains of knowledge they integrated in their planning as well as differences in the adaptations that each made in the classroom. In this sense, this study contributes to better understanding the complexity of teachers’ professional practice.     

Building bridges within mathematics education: Teaching, research, and instructional design

Within mathematics education, classroom teachers, educational researchers, and instructional designers share the common goals of understanding and improving the teaching and learning of mathematics. Teachers work to help students learn; researchers study how people learn and teach mathematics; and designers develop instructional materials to support teachers and students. Each community (of teachers, of researchers, and of designers) develops its own perspectives, methods, and expertise. Too seldom, however, do practitioners have the opportunity to share their knowledge across communities. This first-person, retrospective case study speaks to the challenges and rewards of building bridges among these three communities by charting the evolution of an instructional activity (using graphing software to explore slope) through four cycles of teaching, research, and design. Initially separate, the three perspectives of teacher, researcher, and designer begin to interact as the worksite moves from the university laboratory to the author's classroom and then to other teachers’ classrooms. Many of these interactions are fruitful, resulting in new insights and strategies that strengthen the final product and inform the practitioner. At the same time, some tensions arise, particularly between teaching and research, highlighting fundamental differences between these fields. Lessons from this case study suggest implications for collaborations among teachers, researchers, and designers.     

Investigations and explorations in the mathematics classroom

In Portugal, since the beginning of the 1990s, problem solving became increasingly identified with mathematical explorations and investigations. A number of research studies have been conducted, focusing on students’ learning, teachers’ classroom practices and teacher education. Currently, this line of work involves studies from primary school to university mathematics. This perspective impacted the mathematics curriculum documents that explicitly recommend teachers to propose mathematics investigations in their classrooms. On national meetings, many teachers report experiences involving students’ doing investigations and indicate to use regularly such tasks in their practice. However, this still appears to be a marginal activity in most mathematics classes, especially when there is pressure for preparation for external examinations (at grades 9 and 12). International assessments such as PISA and national assessments (at grades 4 and 6) emphasize tasks with realistic contexts. They reinforce the view that mathematics tasks must be varied beyond simple computational exercises or intricate abstract problems but they do not support the notion of extended explorations. Future developments will show what paths will emerge from these contradictions between promising research and classroom reports, curriculum orientations, professional experience, and assessment frameworks and instruments.     

Teachers and didacticians: key stakeholders in the processes of developing mathematics teaching

This paper sets the scene for a special issue of ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education—by tracing key elements of the fields of teacher and didactician/teacher-educator learning related to the development of opportunities for learners of mathematics in classrooms. It starts from the perspective that joint activity of these two groups (teachers and didacticians), in creation of classroom mathematics, leads to learning for both. We trace development through key areas of research, looking at forms of knowledge of teachers and didacticians in mathematics; ways in which teachers or didacticians in mathematics develop their professional knowledge and skill; and the use of theoretical perspectives relating to studying these areas of development. Reflective practice emerges as a principal goal for effective development and is linked to teachers’ and didacticians’ engagement with inquiry and research. While neither reflection nor inquiry are developmental panaceas, we see collaborative critical inquiry between teachers and didacticians emerging as a significant force for teaching development. We include a summary of the papers of the special issue which offer a state of the art perspective on developmental practice.     

Classroom Interactions Around Problem Contexts and Task Authenticity in Middle School Mathematics

It has been theorized that contextual tasks support student engagement and sense making. Yet, contradictory ideas exist about the role of these tasks in lessons, and further research is needed to explore how classroom interactions can help achieve their intended purposes. Through video observation of lessons in three eighth-grade classrooms using a problem-based curriculum, I investigated how teachers and students interact around problem contexts in written tasks. I found that they discussed contexts in multiple ways, falling into five general categories: referencing, positioning, elaborating, clarifying, and meta-level commentary. Using this framework, I considered how interactions around contexts related to the authenticity of tasks as written and enacted (Palm, 2006). In several lessons, these interactions led to higher authenticity as enacted than as written. These results offer a framework for interpreting context-related classroom interactions and suggest implications for instruction and research on the role contexts might play in mathematics lessons.     

Distinguishing between mathematics classrooms in Australia, China, Japan, Korea and the USA through the lens of the distribution of responsibility for knowledge generation: public oral interactivity and mathematical orality

The research reported in this paper examined spoken mathematics in particular well-taught classrooms in Australia, China (both Shanghai and Hong Kong), Japan, Korea and the USA from the perspective of the distribution of responsibility for knowledge generation in order to identify similarities and differences in classroom practice and the implicit pedagogical principles that underlie those practices. The methodology of the Learner’s Perspective Study documented the voicing of mathematical ideas in public discussion and in teacher–student conversations and the relative priority accorded by different teachers to student oral contributions to classroom activity. Significant differences were identified among the classrooms studied, challenging simplistic characterisations of ‘the Asian classroom’ as enacting a single pedagogy, and suggesting that, irrespective of cultural similarities, local pedagogies reflect very different assumptions about learning and instruction. We have employed spoken mathematical terms as a form of surrogate variable, possibly indicative of the location of the agency for knowledge generation in the various classrooms studied (but also of interest in itself). The analysis distinguished one classroom from another on the basis of “public oral interactivity” (the number of utterances in whole class and teacher–student interactions in each lesson) and “mathematical orality” (the frequency of occurrence of key mathematical terms in each lesson). Classrooms characterized by high public oral interactivity were not necessarily sites of high mathematical orality. In particular, the results suggest that one characteristic that might be identified with a national norm of practice could be the level of mathematical orality: relatively high mathematical orality characterising the mathematics classes in Shanghai with some consistency, while lessons studied in Seoul and Hong Kong consistently involved much less frequent spoken mathematical terms. The relative contributions of teacher and students to this spoken mathematics provided an indication of how the responsibility for knowledge generation was shared between teacher and student in those classrooms. Specific analysis of the patterns of interaction by which key mathematical terms were introduced or solicited revealed significant differences. It is suggested that the empirical investigation of mathematical orality and its likely connection to the distribution of the responsibility for knowledge generation and to student learning ourcomes are central to the development of any theory of mathematics instruction and learning.     

NEEDING TO USE ALGEBRA

We have completed a Teacher Training Agency (TTA) funded project looking at the teaching and learning of algebra with one mixed-ability year 7 class (11–12 year-olds in the UK). We take Kieran's (quoted in Sutherland, 1997) definition of algebra and see ourselves as developing a'community of practice’ (Lave and Wenger, 1991) in the classroom where the practice is not that of mathematician but of inquirer (Schoenfeld, 1996) into mathematics. The teacher in this community acts as role model for inquirer and metacomments (Bateson, 1972) on the practice of inquiry. In this paper we present evidence for how such metacommenting supports the development of a'community of inquiry’ which leads to the'need’ for algebraic activity. We conclude with a case study, illustrating one student's need for algebra.     

Mapping Pedagogical Opportunities Provided by Mathematics Analysis Software

This paper proposes a taxonomy of the pedagogical opportunities that are offered by mathematics analysis software such as computer algebra systems, graphics calculators, dynamic geometry or statistical packages. Mathematics analysis software is software for purposes such as calculating, drawing graphs and making accurate diagrams. However, its availability in classrooms also provides opportunities for positive changes to teaching and learning. Very many examples are documented in the professional and research literature, and in this paper we organize them into 10 types. These are displayed in the form of a ‘pedagogical map’, which further classifies them according to whether the opportunity arises from new opportunities for the mathematical tasks used, change to interpersonal aspects of the classroom or change to the point of view on mathematics as a subject. The map can be used in teacher professional development to draw attention to possibilities for lessons or as a catalyst for professional discussion. For research on teaching, it can be used to map current practice, or to track professional growth. The intention of the map is to summarise the potential benefits of teaching with technology in a form that may be useful for both teachers and researchers.     

Contingent conceptions of accomplished practice: the cultural specificity of discourse in and about the mathematics classroom

Classroom discourse and professional discourse about classrooms constitute forms of social performance undertaken within affordances and constraints that can be both cultural and linguistic. The nature of those discourses performed in mathematics classrooms provides a key indicator of pedagogical principles underlying classroom practice and the theories of learning on which these principles are implicitly founded. The discourses about mathematics classrooms give expression to these pedagogical principles sometimes explicitly and sometimes through embedding privileged forms of practice in the naming conventions by which the mathematics classroom is described. The research reported in this paper suggests that each of these discourses is culturally and linguistically specific. As a consequence, conceptions of accomplished practice are contingent on the history of custom and insight embedded in the conventions of practice and the language with which that practice is described.     

Mathematics teaching development as a human practice: identifying and drawing the threads

The didactic triangle links mathematics, teachers and students in a consideration of teaching?Clearning interactions in mathematics classrooms. This paper focuses on teachers and teaching in the development of fruitful learning experiences for students with mathematics. It recognises primarily that teachers are humans with personal characteristics, subject to a range of influences through the communities of which they are a part, and considers aspects of teachers?? personhood, identity and agency in designing teaching for the benefit of their students. Teaching is seen as a developmental process in which inquiry plays a central role, both in doing mathematics in the classroom and in exploring teaching practice. The teacher-as-inquirer in collaboration with outsider researchers leads to growth of knowledge in teaching through development of identity and agency for both groups. The inclusion of the outsider researcher brings an additional node into the didactic triangle.     

Characterizing exemplary mathematics instruction in Japanese classrooms from the learner’s perspective

This paper aims to examine key characteristics of exemplary mathematics instruction in Japanese classrooms. The selected findings of large-scale international studies of classroom practices in mathematics are reviewed for discussing the uniqueness of how Japanese teachers structure and deliver their lessons and what Japanese teachers value in their instruction from a teacher’s perspective. Then an analysis of post-lesson video-stimulated interviews with 60 students in three “well-taught” eighth-grade mathematics classrooms in Tokyo is reported to explore the learners’ views on what constitutes a “good” mathematics lesson. The co-constructed nature of quality mathematics instruction that focus on the role of students’ thinking in the classroom is discussed by recasting the characteristics of how lessons are structured and delivered and what experienced teachers tend to value in their instruction from the learner’s perspective. Valuing students’ thinking as necessary elements to be incorporated into the development of a lesson is the key to the approach taken by Japanese teachers to develop and maintain quality mathematics instruction.     

Developing teacher capacity to explore non-routine problems through a focus on the social semiotics of mathematics classroom discourse

This paper reports on a research project exploring the social semiotics of mathematics teaching and learning in urban middle schools. Participating teachers attended a Lesson Study Group that focused on the linguistic and diagrammatic challenges of framing and solving non-routine mathematics problems. This paper describes key social semiotic concepts explored with the teachers during the lesson study activities, focusing on the complex conjunction of the mathematics register and everyday language. We use examples from the participants’ classrooms to show the relevance of these concepts in studying classroom discourse, focusing in particular on the complex conjunction of diagramming and language.     

Envisioning my mathematics classroom: Validating the Draw-a-Mathematics-Teacher-Test Rubric

Teachers need the opportunity to reflect, rethink, and adapt as they continually develop their image of their role in their mathematics classrooms. Thus, the purpose of this research was to examine how the Draw-a-Mathematics-Teacher-Test (DAMTT) and rubric can be used to assess preservice elementary teachers’ images of and beliefs about their future mathematics classrooms and validate the Draw-a-Math-TeacherTest-Rubric (DAMTT-R). Results suggest that the DAMTT-R is a valid measure and yields consistent results. Additionally, analysis of preservice elementary teachers’ (PETs) DAMTT revealed that only slightly more than one-third (36.9%) drew a picture and described their classroom in such a way that it reflected beliefs aligned with student-centered pedagogic practices. While mathematics educators may aim for the majority of PETs to leave their programs having developed beliefs aligned with and supportive of student-centered pedagogic practices, the results of this study revealed that 25% of PETs held beliefs that align with teacher-centered pedagogic practices. Lastly, 38.1% of the PETs reflected beliefs about their pedagogic practices, as measured by the DAMTT and the DAMTT-R, aligned with a transition between teacher-centered and student-centered.     

Three modes of STEM integration for middle school mathematics teachers

Of the four subjects in an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach, mathematics has not received enough focus. This could be in part because mathematics teachers may be apprehensive or unsure about how to implement integrated STEM education in their classrooms. There are benefits to integrated STEM in a mathematics classroom though, including increased motivation, interest, and achievement for students. This article discusses three methods that middle school mathematics teachers can utilize to integrate STEM subjects. By focusing on open‐ended problems through engineering design challenges, mathematical modeling, and mathematics integrated with technology middle school students are more likely to see mathematics as relevant and valuable. Important considerations are discussed as well as recent research with these approaches.     

Building on mathematical events in the classroom

Mathematical events from classrooms were used as stimuli to encourage mathematical discussion in two groups of mathematics teachers at the secondary level. Each event was accompanied by an analysis of mathematics that would be useful to the teacher in such a situation. The Situations, mathematical events and analyses, were used originally to create a framework describing the Mathematical Proficiency for Teaching at the Secondary Level, and then they were used with both Prospective and Practicing teachers to validate the framework. Teachers involved in the validation research claimed that the process was instructional. The process is explained, and teachers’ quotes provide evidence that the experience provoked changes in teachers’ understanding of mathematics. This process, which builds on mathematical events from the classroom, holds potential as a professional development experience that helps teachers expand their expertise in teaching mathematics.     

Talking mathematically: An analysis of discourse communities

Discourse has always been at the heart of teaching. In more recent years, the mathematics education community has also turned its attention towards understanding the role of discourse in mathematics teaching and learning. Using earlier classifications of discourse, in this paper, we looked at three types of classrooms: classrooms that engage in high discourse, low discourse and a hybrid of the two. We aimed to understand how the elements of each discourse affected classroom learning, relationships between teachers and students, and participatory structures for students. Overall, our findings highlight the important relationship between cognitively demanding tasks and mathematical talk, and the power of discourse as a “thinking device” as opposed to mere conduit of knowledge. Our work also points to the under-theorized nature of hybrid discourse in mathematics classrooms, thereby providing some directions for pedagogy and further research.     

Mathematics and science teacher training program improves inquiry practices for teachers

With the call for increasing the level of inquiry-based instruction in mathematics and science classrooms, it is imperative for teacher education programs to prepare teachers with these skills. This study draws from classroom observation data to determine the influence a unique teacher certification program has on key aspects of teacher practice using a series of Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Findings indicate that teachers participating in the program have a statistically significant level of growth in their use of inquiry practices related to Classroom Culture. In addition, by the fourth semester of their involvement in the program, participating teachers employ higher levels of inquiry instruction than a comparison group of teachers for almost every factor assessed.     

“Mathematicians Would Say It This Way”: An Investigation of Teachers' Framings of Mathematicians

Although popular media often provides negative images of mathematicians, we contend that mathematics classroom practices can also contribute to students' images of mathematicians. In this study, we examined eight mathematics teachers' framings of mathematicians in their classrooms. Here, we analyze classroom observations to explore some of the characteristics of the teachers' framings of mathematicians in their classrooms. The findings suggest that there may be a relationship between a teachers' mathematics background and his/her references to mathematicians. We also argue that teachers need to be reflective about how they represent mathematicians to their students, and that preservice teachers should explore their beliefs about what mathematicians actually do.