Comodulation masking release and auditory grouping

The detectability of a pure-tone signal masked by a band of noise centered on the signal can be improved by the addition of flanking noise bands, provided that the temporal envelopes of the flanking bands are correlated with that of the on-signal band. This phenomenon is referred to as comodulation masking release (CMR). The present study examined CMR in conditions in which some flanking noise bands were comodulated with the on-signal band, but other flanking bands (termed "deviant" bands) were not. Past research has indicated that CMR is often substantially reduced when deviant bands are present at spectral locations close to the signal frequency. An investigation was undertaken to determine whether the disruptive effects of such bands could be reduced by factors related to auditory grouping. The signal frequency was 100 Hz. In one condition, only 20-Hz-wide comodulated bands, centered on 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, and 1600 Hz, were present. The CMR for this condition, referenced to threshold for the on-signal band only, was approximately 15 dB. In a second condition, two deviant bands were added at 900 and 1100 Hz; their presence reduced the CMR to only 3-4 dB. The number of deviant bands was then increased progressively, from two to eight bands. Deviant bands either shared a common envelope (codeviant), or had unique envelopes (multideviant). The number of bands that were comodulated with the on-signal band was held constant at six.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Influence of place synchrony on detection of a sinusoid

A series of experiments was performed to study the ability of the ear to code the temporal envelope of a waveform as demonstrated by comodulation masking release (CMR). The stimulus for all experiments was composed of a tone-burst signal, a 100-Hz-wide masker band centered at the signal frequency, and a second 100-Hz-wide noise band of variable frequency, the cue band. The cue band had a temporal envelope which was either correlated with or independent of that of the masker. The signal was a 100-Hz tone burst for most experiments. For the monotic stimulus, the correlated cue band results in lowered signal detection thresholds over a range extending from around 2/3 oct below the signal frequency to 1/3 oct above that frequency. When measured dichotically, with the signal and masker band in one ear and the cue band in the opposite ear, that effective range is expanded but the detection threshold shifts are a bit smaller. The greatest CMR is observed when the stimulus is presented diotically. With regard to effects of level and frequency, our data show CMR increasing with increasing stimulus level for a cue band lower in frequency than the signal, but show little effect of level for a cue band higher in frequency. Similarly, CMR increases with increasing stimulus frequency when the cue band is lower in frequency, but shows little effect of frequency for a cue band higher in frequency.     

Comodulation detection differences with multiple signal bands

Detection thresholds were determined for signals consisting of one, two, or five noise bands embedded in eight "cue" bands. All of the noise bands were 100 Hz wide. The center frequencies of the signal bands ranged from 1250-3250 Hz in 500-Hz steps, and those of the cue bands ranged from 500-4000 Hz in 500-Hz steps. The multiple-band signals either all had the same temporal envelope, or all had different temporal envelopes. Similarly, the cue bands either all had the same temporal envelope or all had different temporal envelopes. In separate listening conditions, signal thresholds were determined for various combinations of the temporal envelope patterns of the signal and cue bands. The results were analyzed both in terms of differences in threshold across listening conditions, and in terms of changes in threshold within a listening condition, as the number of signal bands was increased. For both the single- and multiple-band signals, performance was best when the signal band(s) had a different envelope from the common envelope of the cue bands, and performance was worst when either the cue bands all had different envelopes, or the signal and cue bands all shared the same envelope. The thresholds of the multiple-band signals were better fitted by an independent-thresholds model than by a statistical-summation model. However, neither model predicted thresholds uniformly well in all listening conditions. The results are discussed in terms of both "within-channel" and "across-channel" models.     

Monaural envelope correlation perception, revisited: effects of bandwidth, frequency separation, duration, and relative level of the noise bands

This article presents the results of two experiments investigating performance on a monaural envelope correlation discrimination task. Subjects were asked to discriminate pairs of noise bands that had identical envelopes (referred to as correlated stimuli) from pairs of noise bands that had envelopes which were independent (uncorrelated stimuli). In the first experiment, a number of stimulus parameters were varied: the center frequency of the lower frequency noise band in a pair, f1; the frequency separation between component noise bands; the duration of the stimuli; and the bandwidth of the component noise bands. For a long stimulus duration (500 ms) and a relatively wide bandwidth (100 Hz), subjects could easily discriminate correlated from uncorrelated stimuli for a wide range of frequency separations between the component noise bands. This was true both when f1 was 350 Hz, and when f1 was 2500 Hz. In each case, narrowing the bandwidth to 25 Hz, or shortening the duration to 100 ms, or both, made the task more difficult, but not impossible. In the second experiment, the level of the higher frequency noise band in a pair was varied. Performance did not decrease monotonically as the level of this band was decreased below the level of the other band, and only showed marked impairment when the level of the higher frequency band was at least 60 dB below that of the lower frequency band. The pattern of results in these two experiments is different from that which is obtained when the same stimulus parameters are varied in experiments investigating comodulation masking release (CMR). This suggests that the mechanisms underlying CMR and those underlying the discrimination of envelope correlation are not identical.     

The effect of across-frequency differences in masking level on spectro-temporal pattern analysis

Masking noise well separated in frequency from the signal may improve the detectability of the signal if the masking noise is modulated. This effect is referred to as co-modulation masking release (CMR). The present experiments examine the effect of across-frequency differences in masking noise level on CMR. Three experiments were performed, each using a different method to create modulated noise stimuli having across-frequency differences in the spectrum level. All stimulation was monaural. Experiment I used a notched noise method (selectively reducing the level for the critical band centered on the signal). Experiment II used a method in which the level of a 100-Hz-wide masker centered on the signal was varied, and flanking noise bands were of constant level. Experiment III used a method in which flanking noise bands were varied in level, and the 100-Hz-wide masker centered on the signal was of constant level. The signal was a 1000-Hz, 300-ms pure tone. The CMR effect was negated by small spectral notches centered on the signal (experiment I). However, CMR proved to be relatively robust to across-frequency level differences in experiments II and III (a CMR effect occurred for across-frequency differences in spectrum level as great as 20 dB). Low CMR's obtained in experiment I were probably due to relatively poor correlation of across-frequency modulation pattern which occurred with notched noise. The results of experiments II and III suggest that the fluctuation pattern is of primary importance in providing release from masking, and that information on absolute levels, coded across frequency, is of less importance.     

The role of monaural frequency selectivity in binaural analysis

The relation between the monaural critical band and binaural analysis was examined using an NoSm MLD paradigm, in order to resolve ambiguities about the width of the masking spectrum important for binaural detection. A 500-Hz pure-tone signal was presented with a 600-Hz-wide band of masking noise to the signal ear. Bands of noise ranging in width from 25 to 600 Hz, or noise notches (imposed on a 600-Hz-wide band centered on the signal frequency) ranging in width from 0 to 600 Hz were presented to the nonsignal ear. All noise bands and notches were centered on 500 Hz, the frequency of the signal. The effects of varying bandwidth were radically different from those of varying notchwidth: the MLD changed from zero to approximately 8 dB over a bandwidth range of 400 Hz; for notchwidths, however, the MLD changed 8 dB over a range of only 50 Hz. The results support an interpretation that the fine frequency selectivity of monaural analysis is preserved in peripheral binaural interaction, but that a relatively wide frequency range of critical bands is scanned at a later stage of binaural processing. It was suggested that the wide spectral range of binaural analysis may provide a background against which binaural differences due to the signal are detected.     

Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference

The present study sought to clarify the role of non-simultaneous masking in the binaural masking level difference for maskers that fluctuate in level. In the first experiment the signal was a brief 500-Hz tone, and the masker was a bandpass noise (100-2000 Hz), with the initial and final 200-ms bursts presented at 40-dB spectrum level and the inter-burst gap presented at 20-dB spectrum level. Temporal windows were fitted to thresholds measured for a range of gap durations and signal positions within the gap. In the second experiment, individual differences in out of phase (NoSπ) thresholds were compared for a brief signal in a gapped bandpass masker, a brief signal in a steady bandpass masker, and a long signal in a narrowband (50-Hz-wide) noise masker. The third experiment measured brief tone detection thresholds in forward, simultaneous, and backward masking conditions for a 50- and for a 1900-Hz-wide noise masker centered on the 500-Hz signal frequency. Results are consistent with comparable temporal resolution in the in phase (NoSo) and NoSπ conditions and no effect of temporal resolution on individual observers' ability to utilize binaural cues in narrowband noise. The large masking release observed for a narrowband noise masker may be due to binaural masking release from non-simultaneous, informational masking.     

Comodulation detection differences using noise-band signals

In a variant of the standard paradigm employed to study comodulation masking release (CMR), a narrow noise band was used as a signal in the presence of "cue" bands which had either the same or different temporal envelopes. The number of cue bands present ranged from zero to four; when there were two or four cue bands, they were either all presented at the same overall level or the spectral profile was "scrambled" in a haphazard manner. Different noise samples were presented within and across trials. The result was in the opposite direction from the standard CMR outcome; that is, better performance was obtained when the envelopes of the cue band(s) were uncorrelated with those of the signal band than when they were correlated. These comodulation detection differences (CDDs) ranged from a decibel or two up to 10-12 dB in different conditions, and were generally larger the more cue bands present. Standard CMR conditions, which were run as controls, revealed that the detectability of a tonal signal does not increase as the number of cue bands is increased from one to four-an outcome which differs from those obtained in profile analysis experiments. The data taken with the equal-level and the scrambled-level cues differed little in both the CDD and the CMR conditions. All noise bands were 100 Hz wide, and approximately 250 ms in duration. The signal band in CDD and the masker band in CMR were centered at 2500 Hz. The psychophysical procedure was two-interval forced choice.     

Failure to obtain comodulation masking release with frequency-modulated maskers

These experiments were intended to determine whether comodulation masking release (CMR) occurs for maskers that are modulated in frequency rather than in amplitude. In experiment I, thresholds for a sinusoidal signal were measured in the presence of two continuous sinusoidal maskers: one was centered at the signal frequency (1.0 kHz), and the other was positioned at flanking frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 kHz. The two maskers were frequency modulated (FM) by the same low-pass-noise modulator (correlated condition) or by independent noise modulators (uncorrelated condition). Thresholds were the same for the correlated and uncorrelated maskers, i.e., no CMR occurred. This was also true when the flanking band was presented in the ear opposite to that containing the signal and the on-frequency masking band. In experiment II, 25-Hz-wide noise maskers were used. The on-frequency band was sinusoidally frequency modulated, while the off-frequency band either had the same FM or no FM. Thresholds were similar for the two conditions, again indicating that no CMR occurred. The results suggest that, unlike amplitude modulation, correlated FM of the masker in different frequency bands does not give rise to a release from masking.     

Spectral integration and wideband analysis in gap detection and overshoot paradigms

Several listening conditions show that energy remote from a target frequency can deleteriously affect sensitivity. One interpretation of such results entails a wideband analysis involving a wide predetection filter. The present study tested the hypothesis that both temporal gap detection and overshoot results are consistent with a wideband analysis, as contrasted with statistical combination of information across independent channels. For gap detection, stimuli were random or comodulated 50-Hz-wide noise bands centered on 1000, 1932, 3569, and 6437 Hz. For overshoot, the masker was an 8-kHz low-pass filtered noise, with 5-ms tone bursts presented at the same center frequencies used for gap detection. Signals were presented with either 0- or 250-ms delay after masker onset. In each paradigm, the target was introduced at only one frequency or at all four frequencies. Results from gap detection conditions did not favor a wideband analysis interpretation: Results in the random condition were consistent with an optimal combination of cues across frequency. An across-channel interference effect was also evident when only one of the four bands contained the gap. Although results from the overshoot conditions were consistent with a wideband analysis interpretation, they were more parsimoniously accounted for in terms of statistical combination of information.     

The effects of signal duration on NoSo and NoS pi thresholds at 500 Hz and 4 kHz

A two-interval, two-alternative temporal forced-choice procedure was used to measure NoSo and NoS pi masked thresholds with 500-Hz and 4-kHz tonal signals. The duration of the signal was either 10, 20, 40, or 320 ms. The maskers were 200-Hz-wide bands of Gaussian noise centered at the frequency of the signal and presented continuously. Decreasing the duration of the 500-Hz tonal signal resulted in a modest increase (1.5 dB or so) in the masking-level difference (MLD) measured between NoSo and NoS pi conditions. In contrast, decreasing the duration of the 4-kHz tonal signal resulted in a substantial decrease (4.5 dB or so) in the MLD. Comparisons of the data with thresholds predicted from analyses based on "windows of temporal integration" provided quantitatively acceptable accounts of the data. The data obtained in the NoS pi condition at 4 kHz, which are novel and were of primary interest, were well-accounted for in a statistical sense. However, there were small, but systematic, discrepancies between the predictions and the data. Those discrepancies, although small in magnitude, suggest that binaural temporal integration at high frequencies, where the envelopes of the stimuli convey the information, may be inherently different from both monaural temporal integration and binaural temporal integration at low frequencies.     

The effect of masker interaural phase on the detection of a monaural signal

The masking-level difference (MLD) for a 500-Hz monaural pure-tone signal was examined as a function of the interaural phase shift of a 100-Hz-wide noise band centered on 500 Hz. Results indicated that the MLD decreased in magnitude as the interaural phase shift of the masker increased. In a second experiment, the 100-Hz-wide noise band was used as both the masker and the signal in order to examine the detection cues of interaural time difference and interaural level difference separately. Again, the interaural phase of the masker was varied, and an Sm signal was presented. Results indicated that the MLD decreased as a function of increasing masker interaural temporal difference for the time cue, but that the MLD did not change systematically for the level cue. The deterioration of binaural detection as a function of increasing masker interaural phase difference was not as great as that which has been reported in localization and lateralization experiments.     

Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band

In experiment I, thresholds for 400-ms sinusoidal signals were measured in the presence of a continuous 25-Hz-wide noise centered at signal frequencies (fs) ranging from 250 to 8000 Hz in 1-oct steps. The masker was presented either alone or together with a second continuous 25-Hz-wide band of noise (the flanking band) whose envelope was either correlated with that of the on-frequency band or was uncorrelated; its center frequency ranged from 0.5 fs to 1.5 fs. The flanking band was presented either in the same ear (monotic condition) as the signal plus masker or in the opposite ear (dichotic condition). The on-frequency band and the flanking band each had an overall level of 67 dB SPL. The comodulation masking release, CMR (U-C), is defined as the difference between the thresholds for the uncorrelated and correlated conditions. The CMR (U-C) showed two components: a broadly tuned component, occurring at all signal frequencies and all flanking-band frequencies, and occurring for both monotic and dichotic conditions; and a component restricted to the monotic condition and to flanking-band frequencies close to fs. This sharply tuned component was small for low signal frequencies, increased markedly at 2000 and 4000 Hz, and decreased at 8000 Hz. Experiment II showed that the sharply tuned component of the CMR (U-C) was slightly reduced in magnitude when the level of the flanking band was 10 dB above that of the on-frequency band and was markedly reduced when the level was 10 dB below, whereas the broadly tuned component and the dichotic CMR (U-C) were only slightly affected. Experiment III showed that the sharply tuned component of the CMR (U-C) was markedly reduced when the bandwidths of the on-frequency and flanking bands were increased to 100 Hz, while the broadly tuned component and the dichotic CMR (U-C) decreased only slightly. The argument here is that the sharply tuned component of the monotic CMR (U-C) results from beating between the "carrier" frequencies of the two masker bands. This introduces periodic zeros in the masker envelope, which facilitate signal detection. The broadly tuned component, which is probably a "true" CMR, was only about 3 dB.     

Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers

The threshold for a signal masked by a narrow band of noise centered at the signal frequency (the on-frequency band) may be reduced by adding to the masker a second band of noise (the flanking band) whose envelope is correlated with that of the first band, an effect called comodulation masking release (CMR). This paper examines CMR as a function of masker bandwidth and time delay between the envelopes of the on-frequency and flanking bands. The 1.0-kHz sinusoidal signal had a duration of 400 ms. The on-frequency band was presented alone (reference condition) or with the flanking band. The flanking-band envelope was either correlated or uncorrelated with that of the on-frequency band. Flanking-band center frequencies ranged from 0.25-2.0 kHz. The flanking band was presented either in the same ear as the on-frequency band (monaural condition) or in the opposite ear (dichotic condition). The noise bands had bandwidths of 6.25, 25, or 100 Hz. In the correlated conditions, the flanking-band envelope was delayed with respect to that of the on-frequency band by 0, 5, 10, or 20 ms. For the 100-Hz bandwidth, CMRs were small (typically less than 1 dB) in both monaural and dichotic conditions at all delay times. For the 25-Hz bandwidth, CMRs were about 3.5 dB for the 0-ms delay, and decreased to about 1.5 dB for the 20-ms delay. For the 6.25-Hz bandwidth, CMRs averaged about 5 dB and were almost independent of delay time. The results suggest that the absolute delay time is not the critical variable determining CMR. The magnitude of CMR appears to depend on the correlation between the envelopes of the on-frequency and flanking bands. However, the results do not support a model of CMR that assumes that signal threshold corresponds to a constant change in across-band envelope correlation when the correlation is transformed to Fisher's z.     

Comodulation masking release for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency, and flanking bands

The threshold for a signal masked by a narrow band of noise centered at the signal frequency (the on-frequency band) may be reduced by adding to the masker a second band of noise (the flanking band) whose envelope is correlated with that of the first band. This effect is called comodulation masking release (CMR). These experiments examine two questions. (1) How does the CMR vary with the number and ear of presentation of the flanking band(s)? (2) Is it possible to obtain a CMR when a binaural masking level difference (BMLD) is already present, and vice versa? Thresholds were measured for a 400-ms signal in a continuous 25-Hz-wide noise centered at signal frequencies (fs) of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz. This masker was presented either alone or with one or more continuous flanking bands whose envelopes were either correlated or uncorrelated with that of the on-frequency band; their frequencies ranged from 0.5fs to 1.5fs. CMRs were measured for six conditions in which the signal, the on-frequency band, and the flanking band(s) were presented in various monaural and binaural combinations. When a single flanking band was used, the CMR was typically around 2-3 dB. The CMR increased to 5-6 dB if an additional flanking band was added. The effect of the additional band was similar whether it was in the same ear as the original band or in the opposite ear. At the lowest signal frequency, a large CMR was observed in addition to a BMLD and vice versa. At the highest signal frequency, the extra release from masking was small. The results are interpreted in terms of the cues producing the CMR and the BMLD.     

Masking effects in binaural detection and interaural time discrimination

This study was designed to investigate the effects of masker level and frequency on binaural detection and interaural time discrimination. Detection and interaural time discrimination of a 700-Hz sinusoidal signal were measured as a function of the center frequency and level of a narrow-band masking noise. The masker was a continuous, diotic, 80-Hz-wide noise that varied in center frequency from 250 to 1370 Hz. In the detection experiment, the signal was presented either diotically (NoSo) or interaurally phase reversed (NoS pi). In the interaural time discrimination experiment, the signal level needed to discriminate a 30-microseconds interaural delay was measured. As would be expected, the presence of the masker has a greater effect on NoSo detection than NoS pi detection, and for masker frequencies at or near the signal frequency. In contrast, interaural time discrimination can be improved by the presence of a low-level masker. Also, performance improves more rapidly as the signal/masker frequency separation increases for NoSo detection than for interaural time discrimination and NoS pi detection. For all three tasks, significant upward spread of masking occurs only at the highest masker level; at low masker levels, there is a tendency toward downward spread of masking.     

Enhancements of the edges of temporal masking functions by complex patterns of overshoot and undershoot

The purpose of this report is to present new data that provide a novel perspective on temporal masking, different from that found in the classical auditory literature on this topic. Specifically, measurement conditions are presented that minimize rather than maximize temporal spread of masking for a gated (200-ms) narrow-band (405-Hz-wide) noise masker logarithmically centered at 2500 Hz. Masked detection thresholds were measured for brief sinusoids in a two-interval, forced-choice (21FC) task. Detection was measured at each of 43 temporal positions within the signal observation interval for the sinusoidal signal presented either preceding, during, or following the gating of the masker, which was centered temporally within each 500-ms observation interval. Results are presented for three listeners; first, for detection of a 1900-Hz signal across a range of masker component levels (0-70 dB SPL) and, second, for masked detection as a function of signal frequency (fs = 500-5000 Hz) for a fixed masker component level (40 dB SPL). For signals presented off-frequency from the masker, and at low-to-moderate masker levels, the resulting temporal masking functions are characterized by sharp temporal edges. The sharpness of the edges is accentuated by complex patterns of temporal overshoot and undershoot, corresponding with diminished and enhanced detection, respectively, at both masker onset and offset. This information about the onset and offset timing of the gated masker is faithfully represented in the temporal masking functions over the full decade range of signal frequencies (except for fs=2500 Hz presented at the center frequency of the masker). The precise representation of the timing information is remarkable considering that the temporal envelope characteristics of the gated masker are evident in the remote masking response at least two octaves below the frequencies of the masker at a cochlear place where little or no masker activity would be expected. This general enhancement of the temporal edges of the masking response is reminiscent of spectral edge enhancement by lateral suppression/inhibition.     

Comodulation detection differences in children and adults

This study investigated comodulation detection differences (CDD) in children (ages 4.8-10.1 years) and adults. The signal was 30-Hz wide band of noise centered on 2 kHz, and the masker consisted of six 30-Hz wide bands of noise spanning center frequencies from 870 to 4160 Hz. The envelopes of the masking bands were always comodulated, and the envelope of the signal was either comodulated or random with respect to the masker. In some conditions, the maskers were gated on prior to the signal in order to minimize effects related to perceptual fusion of the signal and masker. CDD was computed as the difference between signal detection thresholds in conditions where all bands were comodulated and conditions where the envelope of the signal was random with respect to the envelopes of the maskers. Values of CDD were generally small in children compared to adults. In contrast, masking release related to masker/signal onset asynchrony was comparable across age groups. The small CDDs in children are discussed in terms of sensitivity to comodulation as a perceptual fusion cue and informational masking associated with the detection of a signal in a complex background, an effect that is ameliorated by asynchronous onset.     

Effect of amplitude modulation coherence for masked speech signals filtered into narrow bands

Introduction of masker amplitude modulation (AM) can improve signal detection in a number of paradigms. In some cases this advantage depends on the coherence of modulation across a relatively wide frequency range. In the experiments described below, observers were asked to identify masked spondee words produced by a single male talker. The target spondees and masking noise were filtered into nine narrow bands, and the coherence of AM of either the speech signal or noise masker was manipulated. Inherent modulation of the masker bands was manipulated via assignment of real and imaginary values to the associated components of each band in the frequency domain, and AM of speech bands was achieved via multiplication with envelopes extracted from these maskers. Responses were based on two alternatives, four alternatives, or open response sets. The effect of masker AM coherence was highly dependent upon the size of the response set: coherent AM was associated with better thresholds in a two-alternative response set, but poorer thresholds in an open response set. Results with AM speech did not depend critically upon the across-frequency temporal synchrony of AM imposed on the speech material.     

Dynamic range and asymmetry of the auditory filter

This experiment was designed to measure the shape and asymmetry of the auditory filter over a wider dynamic range than has been measured previously. Thresholds were measured for 2-kHz sinusoidal signals in the presence of two 800-Hz-wide noise bands, one above and one below the signal frequency. The spectrum level of the noise was 45 dB (re: 20 muPa), and the noise bands were placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically about the signal frequency. The deviation of the signal frequency from the nearer edge of each noise band varied from 0 to 0.8 times the signal frequency. Each ear of six subjects was tested, and the subjects' ages ranged from 22 to 74 years. The auditory filters derived from the data were somewhat asymmetric, with steeper slopes on the high-frequency side; the degree of asymmetry varied across subjects. The asymmetry could be characterized as a uniform stretching of the (linear) frequency scale on one side of the filter. The dynamic range of the auditory filter exceeded 60 dB in the younger listeners, but the dynamic range and sharpness of the filter tended to decrease with increasing age.