Electrochemical behaviour of [Ru(L)(CO)2Cl2] [Ru(L)(CO)Cl3][Me4N] and [Ru(L)(CO)2(CH3CN)2][CF3SO3]2 complexes (L = 2,2′- bipyridine or 4,4′-isopropoxycarbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine)

The clectrochemical behaviour of the complexes [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂Cl₂], [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N] and [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ (L = 2,2′-bipyridine or 4,4′-isopropoxycarbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine) has been investigated in CH₃CN. The oxidation of [Ru(L)(CO)₂Cl₂] produces new complexes [Ru^III(L)(CO)(CH₃CN)₂Cl]²⁺ as a consequence of the instability of the electrogenerated transient Ru^III species [Ru^III(L)(CO)₂Cl₂]⁺. In contrast, the oxidation of [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N] produces the stable [Ru^III(L)(CO)Cl₃] complex. In contrast [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ is not oxidized in the range up to the most positive potentials achievable. The reduction of [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂Cl₂] and [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ results in the formation of identical dark blue strongly adherent electroactive films. These films exhibit the characteristics of a metal-metal bond dimer structure. No films are obtained on reduction of [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N]. The effect of the substitution of the bipyridine ligand by electron-withdrawing carboxy ester groups on the electrochemical behaviour of all these complexes has also been investigated.     

Ruthenium(II/III)‐Based Compounds with Encouraging Antiproliferative Activity against Non‐small‐Cell Lung Cancer

Hereby we present the synthesis of several ruthenium(II) and ruthenium(III) dithiocarbamato complexes. Proceeding from the Na[trans‐Ru^III(dmso)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ) and cis‐[Ru^II(dmso)₄Cl₂] ( 3 ) precursors, the diamagnetic, mixed‐ligand [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes 4 and 5 , the paramagnetic, neutral [Ru^IIIL₃] monomers 6 and 7 , the antiferromagnetically coupled ionic α‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl complexes 8 and 9 as well as the β‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl dinuclear species 10 and 11 (L=dimethyl‐ (DMDT) and pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDT)) were obtained. All the compounds were fully characterised by elemental analysis as well as ¹H NMR and FTIR spectroscopy. Moreover, for the first time the crystal structures of the dinuclear β‐[Ru^III₂(dmdt)₅]BF₄ ? CHCl₃ ? CH₃CN and of the novel [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes were also determined and discussed. For both the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^II and Ru^III complexes the central metal atoms assume a distorted octahedral geometry. Furthermore, in vitro cytotoxicity of the complexes has been evaluated on non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) NCI‐H1975 cells. All the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^III dithiocarbamato compounds (i.e., complexes 6 – 10 ) show interesting cytotoxic activity, up to one order of magnitude higher with respect to cisplatin. Otherwise, no significant antiproliferative effect for either the precursors 2 and 3 or the Ru^II complexes 4 and 5 has been observed.     

Preparation and StructuralCharacterization of RuII‐DMSO and RuIII‐DMSO‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type Phosphotungstates, [PW11O39RuIIDMSO]5– and [PW11O39RuIIIDMSO]4–, and Catalytic Activity for Water Oxidation

Ru^II‐ and Ru^III‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type phosphotungstates with a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) ligand, [PW₁₁O₃₉Ru^IIDMSO]^5– ( 1 ) and [PW₁₁O₃₉Ru^IIIDMSO]^4– ( 2 ), were synthesized. Compound 1 was prepared by reaction of [PW₁₁O₃₉]^7– with [Ru^II(DMSO)₄]Cl₂ in water at 125 °C under hydrothermal conditions and was isolated as a cesium salt. Compound 2 was prepared by reaction of 1 with bromine in water at 60 °C and was isolated as a cesium salt. The compounds were characterized by cyclic voltammetry, elemental analysis, UV/Vis, IR,³¹P NMR, ¹⁸³W NMR, ¹H NMR, and XANES (Ru K‐edge and L₃‐edge)spectroscopic methods. Single crystal structural analysis of 1 revealed that Ru^II is incorporated in the α‐Keggin framework and coordinated by DMSO through a Ru–S bond. Cyclic voltammetry of 1 indicated that the incorporated Ru^II‐DMSO is reversibly oxidizable to the Ru^III‐DMSO derivative 2 . Compound 1 showed catalytic activity for water oxidation in the presence of cerium ammonium nitrate as an oxidant.     

Stabilization of High‐Valence Ruthenium with Silicotungstate Ligands: Preparation,Structural Characterization,and Redox Studies of Ruthenium(III)‐Substituted α‐Keggin‐Type Silicotungstates with Pyridine Ligands, [SiW11O39RuIII(Py)]5−

Ruthenium(III)‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type silicotungstates with pyridine‐based ligands, [SiW₁₁O₃₉Ru^III(Py)]^5?, (Py: pyridine ( 1 ), 4‐pyridine‐carboxylic acid ( 2 ), 4,4′‐bipyridine ( 3 ), 4‐pyridine‐acetamide ( 4 ), and 4‐pyridine‐methanol ( 5 )) were prepared by reacting [SiW₁₁O₃₉Ru^III(H₂O)]^5? with the pyridine derivatives in water at 80 °C and then isolated as their hydrated cesium salts. These compounds were characterized using cyclic voltammetry (CV), UV/Vis, IR, and ¹H NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, titration, and X‐ray absorption near‐edge structure (XANES) analysis (Ru K‐edge and L₃‐edge). Single‐crystal X‐ray analysis of compounds 2 , 3 , and 4 revealed that Ru^III was incorporated in the α‐Keggin framework and was coordinated by pyridine derivatives through a Ru? N bond. In the solid state, compounds 2 and 3 formed a dimer through π? π interaction of the pyridine moieties, whereas they existed as monomers in solution. CV indicated that the incorporated Ru^III–Py was reversibly oxidized into the Ru^IV–Py derivative and reduced into the Ru^II–Py derivative.     

Comparative Study of Ruthenium(II) and Ruthenium(III) Complexes with the Ligand dmbpy (dmbpy = 4, 4′‐Dimethyl‐2, 2′‐bipyridine)

The complex cis‐[Ru^III(dmbpy)₂Cl₂](PF₆) ( 2 ) (dmbpy = 4, 4′‐dimethyl‐2, 2′‐bipyridine) was obtained from the reaction of cis‐[Ru^II(dmbpy)₂Cl₂] ( 1 ) with ammonium cerium(IV) nitrate followed by precipitation with saturated ammonium hexafluoridophosphate. The ¹H NMR spectrum of the Ru^III complex confirms the presence of paramagnetic metal atoms, whereas that of the Ru^II complex displays diamagnetism. The ³¹P NMR spectrum of the Ru^III complex shows one signal for the phosphorus atom of the PF₆^– ion. The perspective view of each [Ru^II/III(dmbpy)₂Cl₂]^0/+ unit manifests that the ruthenium atom is in hexacoordinate arrangement with two dmbpy ligands and two chlorido ligands in cis position. As the oxidation state of the central ruthenium metal atom becomes higher, the average Ru–Cl bond length decreases whereas the Ru–N (dmbpy) bond length increases. The cis‐positioned dichloro angle in Ru^III is 1.3° wider than that in the Ru^II. The dihedral angles between pair of planar six‐membered pyridyl ring in the dmbpy ligand for the Ru^II are 4.7(5)° and 5.7(4)°. The observed inter‐planar angle between two dmbpy ligands in the Ru^II is 89.08(15)°, whereas the value for the Ru^III is 85.46(20)°.     

A Diruthenium Complex of an N-Pyridyl-o-aminophenol Derivative: A Route to Mixed Valency

An N-pyridyl-o-aminophenol derivative that stabilises mixed-valence states of ruthenium ions is disclosed. A diruthenium complex, [(L_IQ⁰)Ru₂Cl₅] ⋅ MeOH ( 1⋅ MeOH) is successfully isolated, in which L_IQ⁰ is the o-iminobenzoquinone form of 2-[(3-nitropyridin-2-yl)amino]phenol (L_APH₂). In 1 , L_IQ⁰ oriented towards one ruthenium centre is a non-innocent NO-donor redox ligand, whereas another oriented towards another ruthenium centre is an innocent pyridine-donor redox ligand. Complex 1 is a diruthenium(II,III) mixed-valence complex, [Ru^II(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^III], with a minor contribution from the diruthenium(III,III) state. [Ru^III(L_ISQ^.−)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^III] contains L_ISQ^.−, which is the o-iminobenzosemiquinonate anion radical form of the ligand. Complexes 1 ⁻ and 1 ⁺ are diruthenium(II,II), [Ru^II(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^II], and diruthenium(III,III), [Ru^III(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^III], complexes, respectively, of L_IQ⁰. Complex 1 ²⁻ is a diruthenium(II,II) complex of the o-iminobenzosemiquinonate anion radical (L_ISQ^.−), [Ru^II(L_ISQ^.−)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^II], with a minor contribution from the diruthenium(III,II) form, [Ru^III(L_AP²⁻)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^II]. Complex 1 ²⁺ is a diruthenium(III,IV) mixed-valence complex of L_IQ⁰, [Ru^III(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^IV]. Complexes 1 and 1 ²⁺ exhibit inter-valence charge-transfer transitions at λ=1300 and 1370 nm, respectively.     

Outer‐Sphere 2 e−/2 H+ Transfer Reactions of Ruthenium(II)‐Amine and Ruthenium(IV)‐Amido Complexes

A diverse set of 2 e⁻/2 H⁺ reactions are described that interconvert [Ru^II(bpy)(en*)₂]²⁺ and [Ru^IV(bpy)(en‐H*)₂]²⁺ (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine, en*=H₂NCMe₂CMe₂NH₂, en*‐H=H₂NCMe₂CMe₂NH⁻), forming or cleaving different O−H, N−H, S−H, and C−H bonds. The reactions involve quinones, hydrazines, thiols, and 1,3‐cyclohexadiene. These proton‐coupled electron transfer reactions occur without substrate binding to the ruthenium center, but instead with precursor complex formation by hydrogen bonding. The free energies of the reactions vary over more than 90 kcal mol⁻¹, but the rates are more dependent on the type of X−H bond involved than the associated ΔG °. There is a kinetic preference for substrates that have the transferring hydrogen atoms in close proximity, such as ortho ‐tetrachlorobenzoquinone over its para ‐isomer and 1,3‐cyclohexadiene over its 1,4‐isomer, perhaps hinting at the potential for concerted 2 e⁻/2 H⁺ transfers.     

Synthesis and spectral studies on heterobimetallic complexes of manganese and ruthenium derived from N-(2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylenebenzoylhydrazide

The complex [Mn^IV(napbh)₂] (napbhH₂ = N-(2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylenebenzoylhydrazide) reacts with activated ruthenium(III) chloride in methanol in 1 : 1.2 molar ratio under reflux, giving heterobimetallic complexes, [Mn^IV(napbh)₂Ru^IIICl₃(H₂O)] · [Ru^III(napbhH)Cl₂(H₂O)] reacts with Mn(OAc)₂·4H₂O in methanol in 1 : 1.2 molar ratio under reflux to give [Ru^III(napbhH)Cl₂(H₂O)Mn^II(OAc)₂]. Replacement of aquo in these heterobimetallic complexes has been observed when the reactions are carried out in the presence of pyridine (py), 3-picoline (3-pic), or 4-picoline (4-pic). The molar conductances for these complexes in DMF indicates 1 : 1 electrolytes. Magnetic moment values suggest that these heterobimetallic complexes contain Mn^IV and Ru^III or Ru^III and Mn^II in the same structural unit. Electronic spectral studies suggest six coordinate metal ions. IR spectra reveal that the napbhH₂ ligand coordinates in its enol form to Mn^IV and bridges to Ru^III and in the keto form to Ru^III and bridging to Mn^II.     

RuII and RuIII Chloronitrile Complexes: Synthesis,Reaction Chemistry,Solid State Structure,and (Spectro)Electrochemical Behavior

The synthesis of [Ti₆O₄(OiPr)₈(O₂CPh)₈] ( 3 ) and [RuCl(N≡CR)₅][RuCl₄(N≡CR)₂] ( 4a , R = Me; 4b , R = Ph), [Ru(N≡CPh)₆][RuCl₄(N≡CPh)₂] ( 5 ) and [H₃O][RuCl₄(N≡CMe)₂] ( 7a ) is discussed. Crystallization of 5 from CH₂Cl₂ gave trans-[RuCl₂(N≡CPh)₄] ( 6 ). The solid-state structures of 3 , 4a , b , 5 , 6 and 7a are reported. Complex 4b forms a 3D network, while 6 displays a 2D structure, due to π-interactions between the benzonitrile ligands. The (spectro)electrochemical behavior of 4a , b and 6 was studied at 25 and –72 °C and the results thereof are compared with [NEt₄][RuCl₄(N≡CMe)₂] ( 7b ) and [RuCl(N≡CPh)₅][PF₆] ( 8 ). The electrochemical response of the cation and the anion in 4a , b are independent from each other. [RuCl(N≡CR)₅]⁺ possesses one reversible Ru^II/Ru^III process. However, [RuCl₄(N≡CMe)₂]^– was shown to be prone to ligand exchange and disproportionation upon formation of either a Ru^IV and Ru^II species at 25 °C, while at –72 °C the rapid conversion of the electrochemically formed species is hindered. In situ IR and UV/Vis/NIR studies confirmed the respective disproportionation reaction products of the aforementioned oxidation and reduction, respectively.     

A novel one‐dimensional complex: catena‐poly­[[manganese(III)‐di‐μ‐2‐[(2‐hydroxy­ethyl)­imino­methyl]­phenolato‐κ2O1,N:κO2;κO2:κ2O1] chloride]

In the title one‐dimensional complex, {[Mn^III(C₉H₁₀NO₂)₂]Cl}_n, the Schiff base ligand 2‐[(2‐hydroxy­ethyl)­imino­methyl]­phenolate (Hsae⁻) functions as both a bridging and a chelating ligand. The Mn^III ion is six‐coordinated by two N and four O atoms from four different Hsae⁻ ligands, yielding a distorted MnO₄N₂ octahedral environment. Each [Mn^III(Hsae)₂]⁺ cationic unit has the Mn atom on an inversion centre and each [Mn^III(Hsae)₂]⁺ cation lies about another inversion centre. The chain‐like complex is further extended into a three‐dimensional network structure through Cl⋯H—O hydrogen bonds and C—H⋯π contacts involving the Hsae⁻ rings.     

Mechanistic Study on the Photogeneration of Hydrogen by Decamethylruthenocene

Detailed studies on hydrogen evolution by decamethylruthenocene ([Cp*₂Ru^II]) highlighted that metallocenes are capable of photoreducing hydrogen without the need for an additional sensitizer. Electrochemical, gas chromatographic, and spectroscopic (UV/Vis, ¹H and ¹³C NMR) measurements corroborated by DFT calculations indicated that the production of hydrogen occurs by a two-step process. First, decamethylruthenocene hydride [Cp*₂Ru^IV(H)]⁺ is formed in the presence of an organic acid. Subsequently, [Cp*₂Ru^IV(H)]⁺ is reversibly reduced in a heterolytic reaction with one-photon excitation leading to a first release of hydrogen. Thereafter, the resultant decamethylruthenocenium ion [Cp*₂Ru^III]⁺ is further reduced with a second release of hydrogen by deprotonation of a methyl group of [Cp*₂Ru^III]⁺. Experimental and computational data show spontaneous conversion of [Cp*₂Ru^II] to [Cp*₂Ru^IV(H)]⁺ in the presence of protons. Calculations highlight that the first reduction is endergonic (ΔG⁰=108 kJ mol⁻¹) and needs an input of energy by light for the reaction to occur. The hydricity of the methyl protons of [Cp*₂Ru^II] was also considered.     

Synthesis,characterization and reactivity studies of dichloroacetylacetonato acetylacetone ruthenium(III)

Summary The Ru^III complex [RuCl₂(acac)(acacH)] (acacH = acetylacetone) was isolated in high yield by reacting RuCl₃ with acacH. The compound was used as a convenient starting material for the synthesis of a variety of Ru^III complexes, viz. [RuCl₂(acac)L₂] (L = PPh₃, AsPh₃, py, MeCN, Me₂SO, o-phenylenediamine; L₂ = phen or bipy) and M₂[RuCl₄(acac)] (M = Me₄N, Rb or Cs). The compounds were characterized by physicochemical and spectroscopic methods.     

The reaction of [Ru10C(CO)24][ppn]2 with carbon monoxide to yield [Ru3(CO)12] and [Ru6C(CO)16]2−

The dianion [Ru₁₀C(CO)₂₄]²⁻ in CH₂Cl₂ reacts with CO under ambient conditions to produce quantitative amounts of the species [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] and [Ru₆C(CO)₁₆]²⁻; the hydrido-anion [HRu₁₀C(CO)₂₄]⁻ reacts similarly to form [Ru₆C(CO)₁₆]⁻.     

Photochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Catalyzed by a Ruthenium‐Substituted Polyoxometalate

A polyoxometalate of the Keggin structure substituted with Ru^III, ⁶Q₅[Ru^III(H₂O)SiW₁₁O₃₉] in which ⁶Q=(C₆H₁₃)₄N⁺, catalyzed the photoreduction of CO₂ to CO with tertiary amines, preferentially Et₃N, as reducing agents. A study of the coordination of CO₂ to ⁶Q₅[Ru^III(H₂O)SiW₁₁O₃₉] showed that 1) upon addition of CO₂ the UV/Vis spectrum changed, 2) a rhombic signal was obtained in the EPR spectrum (g_x=2.146, g_y=2.100, and g_z=1.935), and 3) the ¹³C NMR spectrum had a broadened peak of bound CO₂ at 105.78 ppm (Δ_1/2=122 Hz). It was concluded that CO₂ coordinates to the Ru^III active site in both the presence and absence of Et₃N to yield ⁶Q₅[Ru^III(CO₂)SiW₁₁O₃₉]. Electrochemical measurements showed the reduction of Ru^III to Ru^II in ⁶Q₅[Ru^III(CO₂)SiW₁₁O₃₉] at ?0.31 V versus SCE, but no such reduction was observed for ⁶Q₅[Ru^III(H₂O)SiW₁₁O₃₉]. DFT‐calculated geometries optimized at the M06/PC1//PBE/AUG‐PC1//PBE/PC1‐DF level of theory showed that CO₂ is preferably coordinated in a side‐on manner to Ru^III in the polyoxometalate through formation of a Ru? O bond, further stabilized by the interaction of the electrophilic carbon atom of CO₂ to an oxygen atom of the polyoxometalate. The end‐on CO₂ bonding to Ru^III is energetically less favorable but CO₂ is considerably bent, thus favoring nucleophilic attack at the carbon atom and thereby stabilizing the carbon sp² hybridization state. Formation of a O₂C–NMe₃ zwitterion, in turn, causes bending of CO₂ and enhances the carbon sp² hybridization. The synergetic effect of these two interactions stabilizes both Ru–O and C–N interactions and probably determines the promotional effect of an amine on the activation of CO₂ by [Ru^III(H₂O)SiW₁₁O₃₉]^5?. Electronic structure analysis showed that the polyoxometalate takes part in the activation of both CO₂ and Et₃N. A mechanistic pathway for photoreduction of CO₂ is suggested based on the experimental and computed results.     

Ruthenium(III) complexes with modified nucleobases: N-Substituted adenines

New chlorido-dimethylsulfoxide-ruthenium(III) complexes with different N⁶-substituted adenines have been prepared and characterized. Three ruthenium complexes have been structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction crystallography: [Ru^IIICl₄(DMSO)[H-(N⁶-pentyladenine)]] (1), [Ru^IIICl₄(DMSO)[H-(N⁶-hexyladenine)]] (2) and [Ru^IIICl₄(DMSO)[H-(N⁶,N⁶-dibutyladenine)]] (3). In all cases ruthenium ion show octahedral geometry coordinated to four chlorido ligands and one S coordinated sulfoxide (DMSO). The coordination sphere is completed by an adenine moiety coordinated to Ru(III) via N(9) and protonated at N(3). Other similar complexes have been obtained with N⁶-propyladenine, [Ru^IIICl₄(DMSO)[H-(N⁶-propyladenine)]] · 0.5EtOH (4) and N⁶-benzylaminopurine (BAP) [Ru^IIICl₄(DMSO)[H-(BAP)]] · 0.5H₂O (5) which have been spectroscopically characterized. Otherwise, in different reaction conditions, we have obtained an out sphere complex of Ru(II), [H-(BAP)][Ru^IICl₃(DMSO)₃] (6), with identical complex unit than the structurally solved [H-(creat)][Ru^IICl₃(DMSO)₃] (7) which was included for comparison purposes. Preliminary electrophoretic mobility and atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies of the interaction between Ru(III) compounds and plasmidic DNA pBR322 have been performed. These results show different morphological changes in plasmidic DNA forms.     

Biotransformations of Anticancer Ruthenium(III) Complexes: An X‐Ray Absorption Spectroscopic Study

An anti‐metastatic drug, NAMI‐A ((ImH)[Ru^IIICl₄(Im)(dmso)]; Im=imidazole, dmso=S‐bound dimethylsulfoxide), and a cytotoxic drug, KP1019 ((IndH)[Ru^IIICl₄(Ind)₂]; Ind=indazole), are two Ru‐based anticancer drugs in human clinical trials. Their reactivities under biologically relevant conditions, including aqueous buffers, protein solutions or gels (e.g, albumin, transferrin and collagen), undiluted blood serum, cell‐culture medium and human liver (HepG2) cancer cells, were studied by Ru K‐edge X‐ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). These XAS data were fitted from linear combinations of spectra of well‐characterised Ru compounds. The absence of XAS data from the parent drugs in these fits points to profound changes in the coordination environments of Ru^III. The fits point to the presence of Ru^IV/III clusters and binding of Ru^III to S‐donor groups, amine/imine and carboxylato groups of proteins. Cellular uptake of KP1019 is approximately 20‐fold higher than that of NAMI‐A under the same conditions, but it diminishes drastically after the decomposition of KP1019 in cell‐culture media, which indicate that the parent complex is taken in by cells through passive diffusion.     

Ruthenium coordination preferences in imidazole‐containing systems revealed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and molecular modeling: Possible cues for the surprising stability of the Ru (III)/tris (hydroxymethyl)‐aminomethane/imidazole complexes

Ruthenium is a platinoid that exhibits a range of unique chemical properties in solution, which are exploited in a variety of applications, including luminescent probes, anticancer therapies, and artificial photosynthesis. This paper focuses on a recently demonstrated ability of this metal in its +3 oxidation state to form highly stable complexes with tris (hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (H₂NC(CH₂OH)₃, Tris‐base or T) and imidazole (Im) ligands, where a single Ru^III cation is coordinated by two molecules of each T and Im. High‐resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI MS) is used to characterize Ru^III complexes formed by placing a Ru^II complex [(NH₃)₅Ru^IICl]Cl in a Tris buffer under aerobic conditions. The most abundant ionic species in ESI MS represent mononuclear complexes containing an oxidized form of the metal, ie, [X_nRu^IIIT₂ – 2H]⁺, where X could be an additional T (n = 1) or NH₃ (n = 0‐2). Di‐ and tri‐metal complexes also give rise to a series of abundant ions, with the highest mass ion representing a metal complex with an empirical formula Ru₃C₂₄O₂₁N₆H₆₆ (interpreted as cyclo(T₂RuO)₃, a cyclic oxo‐bridged structure, where the coordination sphere of each metal is completed by two T ligands). The empirical formulae of the binuclear species are consistent with the structures representing acyclic fragments of cyclo(T₂RuO)₃ with addition of various combinations of ammonia and dioxygen as ligands. Addition of histidine in large molar excess to this solution results in complete disassembly of poly‐nuclear complexes and gives rise to a variety of ionic species in the ESI mass spectrum with a general formula [Ru^IIIHis_kT_m (NH₃)_n ? 2H]⁺, where k = 0 to 2, m = 0 to 3, and n = 0 to 4. Ammonia adducts are present for all observed combinations of k and m, except k = m = 2, suggesting that [His₂Ru^IIIT₂ ? 2H]⁺ represents a complex with a fully completed coordination sphere. The observed cornucopia of Ru^III complexes formed in the presence of histidine is in stark contrast to the previously reported selective reactivity of imidazole, which interacts with the metal by preserving the RuT₂ core and giving rise to a single abundant ruthenium complex (represented by [Im₂Ru^IIIT₂ ? 2H]⁺ in ESI mass spectra). Surprisingly, the behavior of a hexa‐histidine peptide (HHHHHH) is similar to that of a single imidazole, rather than a single histidine amino acid: The RuT₂ core is preserved, with the following ionic species observed in ESI mass spectra: [HHHHHH·(Ru^IIIT₂)_m ? (3m‐1)H]⁺ (m = 1‐3). The remarkable selectivity of the imidazole interaction with the Ru^IIIT₂ core is rationalized using energetic considerations at the quantum mechanical level of theory.     

Synthesis of the solvento species [Ru2(CO)5(solvent){μ- (RO)2PN(Et)P(OR)2}2]2+ and its potential as a source for a wide range of dinuclear derivatives of ruthenium

Treatment of [Ru₂(μ-CO)(CO)₄{μ-(RO)₂PN(Et)P(OR)₂}₂] (R = Me or Prⁱ), electron-rich derivatives of [Ru₂(CO)₉], with a twice molar amount of a silver(I) salt in aprotic, weakly co-ordinating solvents such as acetone, acetonitrile or benzonitrile leads to the formation of the solvento species [Ru₂(CO)₅(solvent)- {μ-(RO)₂PN(Et)P(OR)₂}₂]²⁺. The structure of the benzonitrile derivative, [Ru₂(CO)₅(PhCN){μ-(PrⁱO)₂PN(Et)P(OPr_i)₂}₂](SbF₆)₂, has been established by X-ray crystallography. The acetone molecule in [Ru₂(CO)₅(acetone){μ- (RO)₂PN(Et)P(OR)₂}₂]²⁺ is readily replaced by various nucleophiles to afford products of the type [Ru₂(CO)₅L{μ-(RO)₂PN(Et)P(OR)₂}₂]²⁺, where L is a neutral ligand such as CO, Me₂C₆H₃NC, PhCN, C₅H₅N, H₂O, Me₂S or SC₄H₈, [Ru₂Y(CO)₅{μ-(RO)₂PN(Et)P(OR)₂}₂]²⁺, where Y⁻ is an anionic ligand such as Cl⁻, Br⁻, I⁻, CN⁻, SCN⁻, MeCO₂⁻, CF₃CO₂⁻ or [Ru₂(μ-Y)(CO)₄{μ-(RO)₂- PN(Et)P(OR)₂}₂]⁺ where Y⁻ is an anionic ligand such as Cl⁻, Br⁻, I⁻, SPh⁻, S₂CNEt₂⁻, MeCO₂⁻ or CF₃CO₂⁻.     

NEW DINUCLEAR ASYMMETRIC COMPLEXES OF RUTHENIUM AND RHENIUM

Abstract

New dinuclear asymmetric complexes of ruthenium and rhenium, of formula [(bpy)(CO)₃ Re^I(4,4′-bpy)Ru^II/III(NH₃)₅]^3+/4+ have been prepared and characterized by spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques. In the mixed-valent species [Re^I, Ru^III], the back electron transfer reaction Ru^II → Re^II, that occurs after light excitation, is predicted to be in the Marcus inverted region. This fact is consistent with the observed quenching of the luminiscence of the Re chromophore in [(bpy)(CO)₃Re^I(4,4′-bpy)Ru^III(NH₃)₅]⁴⁺, when compared to the parent complex [(bpy)(CO)₃Re^I(4,4′-bpy)]⁺. A theoretical treatment due to Creutz, Newton and Sutin has been successfully applied to predict the electronic coupling element in the mixed-valent complex.     

Synthesis of RuHCl(CO)(Hdmpz)(L)2 (L=PPh3, AsPh3, and Hdmpz=3,5-dimethylpyrazole) and crystal structure of RuHCl(CO)(Hdmpz)(AsPh3)2

Treatment of RuHCl(CO)(L)₃ with a slight excess amount of K[HB(3,5-Me₂pz)₃] in boiling MeOH solution yielded unusual 3,5-dimethylpyrzaole (Hdmpz) complexes, RuHCl(CO)(Hdmpz)(L)₂ (L=PPh₃, 1 or AsPh₃, 2). Unexpectedly the dissociation of the bonds between the boron atom and the nitrogen atoms of the potentially tridentate [HB(3,5-Me₂pz)₃]⁻ ligand during the coordination of the ligand to the Ru^II metal has been observed. In a separate preparation, the RuHCl(CO)(Hdmpz)(PPh₃)₂ complex has also been synthesized from the reaction between RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃ and the monodentate Hdmpz ligand. Complexes 1 and 2 have been characterized by elemental analysis, IR and ¹H NMR spectroscopies. Compound 1 has also been prepared by the reaction between RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃ and K[H₂B(3,5-Me₂pz)₂] in boiling toluene solution. The crystal structure of 2 has been studied by X-ray crystallography. The geometrical structure around Ru^II of 2 is a distorted octahedral structure. The crystal structure of 2 consists of a discrete monomeric compound. It is interesting to find that the sterically-demanding [HB(3,5-Me₂pz)₃]⁻ or [H₂B(3,5-Me₂pz)₂]⁻ ligands break up during the reaction with the Ru^II complexes to form the neutral 3,5-dimethylpyrazole complexes. In contrast to these observations, [H₂Bpz₂]⁻ and [H₂B(4-Brpz)₂]⁻ ligands form very stable Ru^II complexes.