A preference disaggregation decision support system for financial classification problems

Classification is one of the most extensively studied problems in the fields of multivariate statistical analysis, operations research and artificial intelligence. Decisions involving a classification of the alternative solutions are of major interest in finance, since several financial decision problems are best studied by classifying a set of alternative solutions (firms, loan applications, investment projects, etc.) in predefined classes. This paper proposes an alternative approach to the classical statistical methodologies that have been extensively used for the study of financial classification problems. The proposed methodology combines the preference disaggregation approach (a multicriteria decision aid method) with decision support systems. More specifically, the FINancial CLASsification (FINCLAS) multicriteria decision support system is presented. The system incorporates a plethora of financial modeling tools, along with powerful preference disaggregation methods that lead to the development of additive utility models for the classification of the considered alternatives into predefined classes. An application in credit granting is used to illustrate the capabilities of the system.     

Constrained optimization using multiple objective programming

In practical applications of mathematical programming it is frequently observed that the decision maker prefers apparently suboptimal solutions. A natural explanation for this phenomenon is that the applied mathematical model was not sufficiently realistic and did not fully represent all the decision makers criteria and constraints. Since multicriteria optimization approaches are specifically designed to incorporate such complex preference structures, they gain more and more importance in application areas as, for example, engineering design and capital budgeting. The aim of this paper is to analyze optimization problems both from a constrained programming and a multicriteria programming perspective. It is shown that both formulations share important properties, and that many classical solution approaches have correspondences in the respective models. The analysis naturally leads to a discussion of the applicability of some recent approximation techniques for multicriteria programming problems for the approximation of optimal solutions and of Lagrange multipliers in convex constrained programming. Convergence results are proven for convex and nonconvex problems.     

Spatial multicriteria decision support for robust land-use suitability: The case of landfill site selection in Northeastern Greece

Multicriteria spatial decision support systems (MC-SDSS) have emerged as an integration of geographical information systems (GIS) and multiple criteria decision aid (MCDA) methods for incorporating conflicting objectives and decision makers’ preferences into spatial decision models. In this paper, we present spatial UTASTAR (S-UTASTAR), a raster-based MC-SDSS for land-use suitability analysis. The multicriteria component of the system is based on the UTA-type disaggregation-aggregation approach. S-UTASTAR is applied in a raster-based case study concerning land-use suitability analysis to identify appropriate municipal solid waste landfill (MSW) sites in Northeast Greece. Moreover, robustness analysis tools are implemented to guarantee robust decision support results. More specifically, during the aggregation phase, the Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis (SMAA) is used to indicate the frequency at which a site achieves the best ranking positions within a large set of alternative landfill sites.     

Multicriteria modelling for a repair contract problem based on utility and the ELECTRE I method

Each alternative for a repair contract implies a specific responsetime and related cost. The response time is associated withthe commitment of repair time, based on the contract. A decisionmaker chooses the best alternative taking into account the systemperformance and the cost of the contract. This problem has beenanalysed through a multicriteria decision model. This decisionmodel supports decision makers in the determination of the bestcombination of contracting conditions. The decision model proposedallows the decision maker to quantify the consequences of anaction taking into account two basic criteria: the cost of thecontract and the system performance. Two different decisionmodels have been built to support decision makers. These decisionmodels are based on different multicriteria approaches. Thefirst, reported in a previous paper, is based on the multiattributeutility theory (MAUT). The model presented in this paper isbased on the ELECTRE I method combined with utility functions.The paper presents the main theoretical aspects related to bothapproaches and practical implications related to model building.A numerical application is presented in order to illustratethe use of the decision model.     

Additive aggregation with variable interdependent parameters: the VIP analysis software

We consider the aggregation of multicriteria performances by means of an additive value function under imprecise information. The problem addressed here is the way an analysis may be conducted when the decision makers are not able to (or do not wish to) fix precise values for the importance parameters. These parameters can be seen as interdependent variables that may take several values subject to constraints. Firstly, we briefly classify some existing approaches to deal with this problem. We argue that they complement each other, each one having its merits and shortcomings. Then, we present a new decision support software—VIP analysis—which incorporates approaches belonging to different classes. It proposes a methodology of analysis based on the progressive reduction of the number of alternatives, introducing a concept of tolerance that lets the decision makers use some of the approaches in a more flexible manner.     

SMAA - Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis

Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis (SMAA) is a multicriteria decision support technique for multiple decision makers based on exploring the weight space. Inaccurate or uncertain input data can be represented as probability distributions. In SMAA the decision makers need not express their preferences explicitly or implicitly; instead the technique analyses what kind of valuations would make each alternative the preferred one. The method produces for each alternative an acceptability index measuring the variety of different valuations that support that alternative, a central weight vector representing the typical valuations resulting in that decision, and a confidence factor measuring whether the input data is accurate enough for making an informed decision.     

Multivariate Gaussian criteria in SMAA

We consider stochastic multicriteria decision-making problems with multiple decision makers. In such problems, the uncertainty or inaccuracy of the criteria measurements and the partial or missing preference information can be represented through probability distributions. In many real-life problems the uncertainties of criteria measurements may be dependent. However, it is often difficult to quantify these dependencies. Also, most of the existing methods are unable to handle such dependency information.In this paper, we develop a method for handling dependent uncertainties in stochastic multicriteria group decision-making problems. We measure the criteria, their uncertainties and dependencies using a stochastic simulation model. The model is based on decision variables and stochastic parameters with given distributions. Based on the simulation results, we determine for the criteria measurements a joint probability distribution that quantifies the uncertainties and their dependencies. We then use the SMAA-2 stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis method for comparing the alternatives based on the criteria distributions. We demonstrate the use of the method in the context of a strategic decision support model for a retailer operating in the liberated European electricity market.     

Developments in fuzzy multicriteria analysis

Selecting or ranking available alternatives (observations/objects) with respect to multiple, often conflicting criteria in a fuzzy environment usually referred to as fuzzy multicriteria analysis is a problem of a major interest in information and engineering. Methodologies for addressing this problem have been developed from a variety of research disciplines, including statistics, econometrics, artificial intelligent, and operations research. This paper presents an overview of the developments in fuzzy multicriteria analysis. It discusses the complexity of fuzzy multicriteria analysis and analyses the existing approaches from four different perspectives for facilitating a better understanding of the recent development in this domain. Finally, the paper elaborates on the future research areas in fuzzy multicriteria analysis.     

Multi-objective modeling for engineering applications:DIDASN++ system

Modeling and simulation of various physical, technical, environmental or socioeconomic processes is often a preliminary step for using the resulting models in computer-aided design or decision support. In engineering computer-aided design, the decisions of the designer might be supported by multicriteria optimization - which in this case should not be considered as a tool for supporting the final choice of the design, but much more as a tool for helping in a flexible analysis of various design options or even various modeling and simulation options. The paper shows how multicriteria optimization techniques can be used for multi-objective analysis of a model from the beginning stages of model construction. With the advancement of computing technology and the methodology of decision support, it is now possible to revise this way basic approaches to modeling and simulation. Various formats of defining nonlinear and time-discrete models are discussed together with related problems of inverse and softly constrained multi-objective simulation. Algebraic differentiation and sensitivity analysis, fuzzy set representation of modeler preferences are also useful techniques of multi-objective modeling. Such techniques are illustrated by engineering applications of a software package DIDASN++ in mechanics and automatic control.     

A multiobjective decomposition-coordination framework with an application to vehicle layout and configuration design

This short paper addresses both researchers in multiobjective optimization as well as industrial practitioners and decision makers in need of solving optimization and decision problems with multiple criteria. To enhance the solution and decision process, a multiobjective decomposition-coordination framework is presented that initially decomposes the original problem into a collection of smaller-sized subproblems that can be solved for their individual solution sets. A common solution for all decomposed and, thus, the original problem is then achieved through a subsequent coordination mechanism that uses the concept of epsilon-efficiency to integrate decisions on the desired tradeoffs between these individual solutions. An application to a problem from vehicle configuration design is selected for further illustration of the results in this paper and suggests that the proposed method is an effective and promising new solution technique for multicriteria decision making and optimization. (© 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: A categorized bibliographic study

This paper provides a categorized bibliography on the application of the techniques of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) to problems and issues in finance. A total of 265 references have been compiled and classified according to the methodological approaches of goal programming, multiple objective programming, the analytic hierarchy process, etc., and to the application areas of capital budgeting, working capital management, portfolio analysis, etc. The bibliography provides an overview of the literature on “MCDM combined with finance,” shows how contributions to the area have come from all over the world, facilitates access to the entirety of this heretofore fragmented literature, and underscores the often multiple criterion nature of many problems in finance.     

Multicriteria order acceptance decision support in over-demanded job shops: A neural network approach

Order acceptance is an important issue in job shop production systems where demand exceeds capacity. In this paper, a neural network approach is developed for order acceptance decision support in job shops with machine and manpower capacity constraints. First, the order acceptance decision problem is formulated as a sequential multiple criteria decision problem. Then a neural network based preference model for order prioritization is described. The neural network based preference model is trained using preferential data derived from pairwise comparisons of a number of representative orders. An order acceptance decision rule based on the preference model is proposed. Finally, a numerical example is discussed to illustrate the use of the proposed neural network approach. The proposed neural network approach is shown to be a viable method for multicriteria order acceptance decision support in over-demanded job shops.     

Asset portfolio optimization using support vector machines and real-coded genetic algorithm

This paper presents an integrated approach for portfolio selection in a multicriteria decision making framework. Firstly, we use Support Vector Machines for classifying financial assets in three pre-defined classes, based on their performance on some key financial criteria. Next, we employ Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm to solve a mathematical model of the multicriteria portfolio selection problem in the respective classes incorporating investor-preferences.     

Influence of model management systems on decision making: empirical evidence and implications

Model management (MM) regards decision models as an important organisational resource deserving prudent management. Despite the remarkable volume of model management literature compiled over the past twenty-odd years, very little is known about how decision makers actually benefit from employing model management systems (MMS). In this paper, we report findings from an experiment designed to verify the idea that the adequacy of modeling support provided by a MMS influences the decision maker's problem solving performance and behaviour. We show that the decision makers who receive adequate modelling support from MMS outperform those without such support. Also, we provide empirical evidence that the MMS help turn the decision makers' perception of problem solving from a number crunching task into development of solution strategies, consequently changing their decision making behaviour.     

Nonessential objectives within network approaches for MCDM

In Gal and Hanne [Eur. J. Oper. Res. 119 (1999) 373] the problem of using several methods to solve a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem with linear objective functions after dropping nonessential objectives is analyzed. It turned out that the solution does not need be the same when using various methods for solving the system containing the nonessential objectives or not. In this paper we consider the application of network approaches for multicriteria decision making such as neural networks and an approach for combining MCDM methods (called MCDM networks). We discuss questions of comparing the results obtained with several methods as applied to the problem with or without nonessential objectives. Especially, we argue for considering redundancies such as nonessential objectives as a native feature in complex information processing. In contrast to previous results on nonessential objectives, the current paper focuses on discrete MCDM problems which are also denoted as multiple attribute decision making (MADM).     

基于UTA方法的关键基础设施系统的保护研究

关键基础设施系统是城市的生命线,但常因突发事件频发而具有不稳定性和脆弱性。一个好的保护方案应该综合考虑关键基础设施系统的韧性和成本等多个目标,但这些目标常常相互冲突而使决策陷入困境。本研究从多目标优化角度入手,探索用UTA方法确定保护关键基础设施系统最佳方案的可行性,UTA法通过与决策者互动获取决策者的偏好信息,并基于线性规划和价值函数原理构建了决策者偏好模型。通过C县电网系统的案例分析发现UTA方法可帮助决策者在决策过程中考虑多目标之间的冲突与权衡,从而确定最满意的决策方案。     

A fuzzy inexact two-phase programming approach to solving optimal allocation problems in water resources management

Inappropriate agricultural activities are the main reasons of water shortage and environmental pollution in many rural areas. How to generate preferred decision schemes for agricultural activities is a critical issue for decision makers. In this study, a two-phase programming approach is advanced for regional water resources allocation in a rural region of China. The approach shows applicability when the uncertain inputs are provided as intervals and such uncertainty is desired to be delivered to the corresponding solutions. Multiple control variables are introduced both in the objective function and constraints of the programming model, which make it possible for the constraints being relaxed under respective levels. A more satisfactory objective value can thus be expected as well as the impact of each constraint on the modeling outputs can be clarified effectively. The decision variables are useful for decision makers to justify and/or adjust the decision schemes for agricultural activities through incorporation of their implicit knowledge on water allocation management.     

Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making

This paper presents a new fuzzy multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approach for evaluating decision alternatives involving subjective judgements made by a group of decision makers. A pairwise comparison process is used to help individual decision makers make comparative judgements, and a linguistic rating method is used for making absolute judgements. A hierarchical weighting method is developed to assess the weights of a large number of evaluation criteria by pairwise comparisons. To reflect the inherent imprecision of subjective judgements, individual assessments are aggregated as a group assessment using triangular fuzzy numbers. To obtain a cardinal preference value for each decision alternative, a new fuzzy MCDM algorithm is developed by extending the concept of the degree of optimality to incorporate criteria weights in the distance measurement. An empirical study of aircraft selection is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the approach.     

Deriving crisp and consistent priorities for fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria systems using non-linear constrained optimization

Fuzzy optimization models are used to derive crisp weights (priority vectors) for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) based multicriteria decision making systems. These optimization models deal with the imprecise judgements of decision makers by formulating the optimization problem as the system of constrained non linear equations. Firstly, a Genetic Algorithm based heuristic solution for this optimization problem is implemented in this paper. It has been found that the crisp weights derived from this solution for fuzzy-AHP system, sometimes lead to less consistent or inconsistent solutions. To deal with this problem, we have proposed a consistency based constraint for the optimization models. A decision maker can set the consistency threshold value and if the solution exists for that threshold value then crisp weights can be derived, otherwise it can be concluded that the fuzzy comparison matrix for AHP is not consistent for the given threshold. Three examples are considered to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Results with the proposed constraint based fuzzy optimization model are more consistent than the existing optimization models.