Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects

Subjects with cochlear impairments often show reduced temporal resolution as measured in gap-detection tasks. The primary goals of these experiments were: to assess the extent to which the enlarged gap thresholds can be explained by elevations in absolute threshold; and to determine whether the large gap thresholds can be explained by the same processes that lead to a slower-than-normal recovery from forward masking. In experiment I gap thresholds were measured for nine unilaterally and eight bilaterally impaired subjects, using bandlimited noise stimuli centered at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz. Gap thresholds were usually larger for the impaired ears, even when the comparisons were made at equal sensation levels (SLs). Gap thresholds tended to increase with increasing absolute threshold, but the scatter of gap thresholds was large for a given degree of hearing loss. In experiment II threshold was measured as a function of the delay between the onset of a 210-ms masker and the onset of a 10-ms signal in both simultaneous- and forward-masking conditions. The signal frequency was equal to the center frequency of the bandlimited noise masker, which was 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 kHz. Five subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments, two subjects with bilateral impairments, and two normal subjects were tested. The rate of recovery from forward masking, particularly the initial rate, was usually slower for the impaired ears, even when the maskers were presented at equal SLs. Large gap thresholds tended to be associated with slow rates of recovery from forward masking.     

The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth.

Temporal gap detection was measured as a function of absolute signal bandwidth at a low-, a mid-, and a high-frequency region in six listeners with normal hearing sensitivity. Gap detection threshold decreased monotonically with increasing stimulus bandwidth at each of the three frequency regions. Given conditions of equivalent absolute bandwidth, gap detection thresholds were not significantly different for upper cutoff frequencies ranging from 600 to 4400 Hz. A second experiment investigated gap detection thresholds at two pressure-spectrum levels, conditions typically resulting in substantially different estimates of frequency selectivity. Estimates of frequency selectivity were collected at the two levels using a notched-noise masker technique. The gap threshold-signal bandwidth functions were almost identical at pressure-spectrum levels of 70 dB and 40 dB for the two subjects in experiment II, while estimates of frequency selectivity showed poorer frequency selectivity at the 70-dB level than at 40 dB. Data from both experiments indicated that gap detection in bandlimited noise was inversely related to signal bandwidth and that gap detection did not vary significantly with changes in signal frequency over the range of 600 to 4400 Hz. Over the range of frequencies investigated, the results indicated no clear relation between gap detection for noise stimuli and peripheral auditory filtering.     

Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds in bandlimited maskers in subjects with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss

Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds were measured at 0.5 and 2.0 kHz in bandpass maskers as a function of masker bandwidth and in a broadband masker with the goal of estimating psychophysical suppression. Suppression was operationally defined in two ways: (1) as a change in forward-masked threshold as a function of masker bandwidth, and (2) as a change in effective masker level with increased masker bandwidth, taking into account the nonlinear growth of forward masking. Subjects were younger adults with normal hearing and older adults with cochlear hearing loss. Thresholds decreased as a function of masker bandwidth in forward masking, which was attributed to effects of suppression; thresholds remained constant or increased slightly with increasing masker bandwidth in simultaneous masking. For subjects with normal hearing, slightly larger estimates of suppression were obtained at 2.0 kHz rather than at 0.5 kHz. For hearing-impaired subjects, suppression was reduced in regions of hearing loss. The magnitude of suppression was strongly correlated with the absolute threshold at the signal frequency, but did not vary with thresholds at frequencies remote from the signal. The results suggest that measuring forward-masked thresholds in bandlimited and broadband maskers may be an efficient psychophysical method for estimating suppression.     

Overshoot in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Overshoot was measured in both ears of four subjects with normal hearing and in five subjects with permanent, sensorineural hearing loss (two with a unilateral loss). The masker was a 400-ms broadband noise presented at a spectrum level of 20, 30, or 40 dB SPL. The signal was a 10-ms sinusoid presented 1 or 195 ms after the onset of the masker. Signal frequency was 1.0 or 4.0 kHz, which placed the signal in a region of normal (1.0 kHz) or impaired (4.0 kHz) absolute sensitivity for the impaired ears. For the normal-hearing subjects, the effects of signal frequency and masker level were similar to those published previously. In particular, overshoot was larger at 4.0 than at 1.0 kHz, and overshoot at 4.0 kHz tended to decrease with increasing masker level. At 4.0 kHz, overshoot values were significantly larger in the normal ears: Maximum values ranged from about 7-26 dB in the normal ears, but were always less than 5 dB in the impaired ears. The smaller overshoot values resulted from the fact that thresholds in the short-delay condition were considerably better in the hearing-impaired subjects than in the normal-hearing subjects. At 1.0 kHz, overshoot values for the two groups of subjects more or less overlapped. The results suggest that permanent, sensorineural hearing loss disrupts the mechanisms responsible for a large overshoot effect.     

Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments

The shape of the auditory filter was estimated at three center frequencies, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz, for five subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. Additional measurements were made at 1.0 kHz using one subject with a unilateral impairment and six subjects with bilateral impairments. Subjects were chosen who had thresholds in the impaired ears which were relatively flat as a function of frequency and ranged from 15 to 70 dB HL. The filter shapes were estimated by measuring thresholds for sinusoidal signals (frequency f) in the presence of two bands of noise, 0.4 f wide, one above and one below f. The spectrum level of the noise was 50 dB (re: 20 mu Pa) and the noise bands were placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically about the signal frequency. The deviation of the nearer edge of each noise band from f varied from 0.0 to 0.8 f. For the normal ears, the filters were markedly asymmetric for center frequencies of 1.0 and 2.0 kHz, the high-frequency branch being steeper. At 0.5 kHz, the filters were more symmetric. For the impaired ears, the filter shapes varied considerably from one subject to another. For most subjects, the lower branch of the filter was much less steep than normal. The upper branch was often less steep than normal, but a few subjects showed a near normal upper branch. For the subjects with unilateral impairments, the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of the filter was always greater for the impaired ear than for the normal ear at each center frequency. For three subjects at 0.5 kHz and one subject at 1.0 kHz, the filter had too little selectivity for its shape to be determined.     

Developmental changes in masked thresholds

Masked thresholds for octave-band noises with center frequencies of 0.4, 1, 2, 4, and 10 kHz and for a 1/3-octave-band noise centered at 10 kHz were obtained from listeners 6.5 months to 20.5 years of age at two levels of a broadband masker (0 and 10 dB/cycle). Thresholds declined exponentially as a function of age for all stimuli tested. The rate and extent of this decline, but not its asymptote, were independent of the frequency or bandwidth employed. The time course for this change parallels that found for electrophysiological maturation of more central auditory processes.     

The effect of masker level uncertainty on intensity discrimination

Thresholds were measured for detection of an increment in level of a 60-dB SPL target tone at 1 kHz, either in quiet or in the presence of maskers at 0.5 and 2 kHz. Interval-by-interval level rove applied independently to remote masker tones substantially elevated thresholds compared to intensity discrimination in quiet, an effect on the order of 10+dB [10 log(DeltaII)]. Asynchronous onset and stimulus envelope mismatches across frequency reduced but did not eliminate masking. A preinterval cue to signal frequency had no effect, but cuing masker frequency reduced thresholds, whether or not masker level was also cued. About 1 to 2 dB of threshold elevation in these conditions can be attributed to energetic masking. Decreasing the overall presentation level and increasing masker separation essentially eliminates energetic masking; under these conditions masker level rove elevates thresholds by approximately 7 dB when the target and masker tones are gated synchronously. This masking persists even when the flanking masker tones are presented contralateral to the target. Results suggest that observers tend to listen synthetically, even in conditions when this strategy reduces sensitivity to the intensity increment.     

Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency

Auditory filter bandwidths were measured using nonsimultaneous masking, as a function of signal level between 10 and 35 dB SL for signal frequencies of 1, 2, 4, and 6 kHz. The brief sinusoidal signal was presented in a temporal gap within a spectrally notched noise. Two groups of normal-hearing subjects were tested, one using a fixed masker level and adaptively varying signal level, the other using a fixed signal level and adaptively varying masker level. In both cases, auditory filters were derived by assuming a constant filter shape for a given signal level. The filter parameters derived from the two paradigms were not significantly different. At 1 kHz, the equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB) decreased as the signal level increased from 10 to 20 dB SL, after which it remained roughly constant. In contrast, at 6 kHz, the ERB increased consistently with signal levels from 10 to 35 dB SL. The results at 2 and 4 kHz were intermediate, showing no consistent change in ERB with signal level. Overall, the results suggest changes in the level dependence of the auditory filters at frequencies above 1 kHz that are not currently incorporated in models of human auditory filter tuning.     

Detection and discrimination of spectral peaks and notches at 1 and 8 kHz

The ability of subjects to detect and discriminate spectral peaks and notches in noise stimuli was determined for center frequencies fc of 1 and 8 kHz. The signals were delivered using an insert earphone designed to produce a flat frequency response at the eardrum for frequencies up to 14 kHz. In experiment I, subjects were required to distinguish a broadband reference noise with a flat spectrum from a noise with either a peak or a notch at fc. The threshold peak height or notch depth was determined as a function of bandwidth of the peak or notch (0.125, 0.25, or 0.5 times fc). Thresholds increased with decreasing bandwidth, particularly for the notches. In experiment II, subjects were required to detect an increase in the height of a spectral peak or a decrease in the depth of a notch as a function of bandwidth. Performance was worse for notches than for peaks, particularly at narrow bandwidths. For both experiments I and II, randomizing (roving) the overall level of the stimuli had little effect at 1 kHz, but tended to impair performance at 8 kHz, particularly for notches. Experiments III-VI measured thresholds for detecting changes in center frequency of sinusoids, bands of noise, and spectral peaks or notches in a broadband background. Thresholds were lowest for the sinusoids and highest for the peaks and notches. The width of the bands, peaks, or notches had only a small effect on thresholds. For the notches at 8 kHz, thresholds for detecting glides in center frequency were lower than thresholds for detecting a difference in center frequency between two steady sounds. Randomizing the overall level of the stimuli made frequency discrimination of the sinusoids worse, but had little or no effect for the noise stimuli. In all six experiments, performance was generally worse at 8 kHz than at 1 kHz. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the detectability of spectral cues introduced by the pinnae.     

Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration

These experiments examine how comodulation masking release (CMR) varies with masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. In experiment 1, thresholds were measured for a 400-ms, 2000-Hz signal masked by continuous noise varying in bandwidth from 50-3200 Hz in 1-oct steps. In one condition, using random noise maskers, thresholds increased with increasing bandwidth up to 400 Hz and then remained approximately constant. In another set of conditions, the masker was multiplied (amplitude modulated) by a low-pass noise (bandwidth varied from 12.5-400 Hz in 1-oct steps). This produced correlated envelope fluctuations across frequency. Thresholds were generally lower than for random noise maskers with the same bandwidth. For maskers less than one critical band wide, the release from masking was largest (about 5 dB) for maskers with low rates of modulation (12.5-Hz-wide low-pass modulator). It is argued that this release from masking is not a "true" CMR but results from a within-channel cue. For broadband maskers (greater than 400 Hz), the release from masking increased with increasing masker bandwidth and decreasing modulator bandwidth, reaching an asymptote of 12 dB for a masker bandwidth of 800 Hz and a modulator bandwidth of 50 Hz. Most of this release from masking can be attributed to a CMR. In experiment 2, the modulator bandwidth was fixed at 12.5 Hz and the signal duration was varied. For masker bandwidths greater than 400 Hz, the CMR decreased from 12 to 5 dB as the signal duration was decreased from 400 to 25 ms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Masking of short stimuli by noises with spiked spectra: II. Time summation and frequency selectivity of hearing in a narrow frequency range

The thresholds of masking of short high-frequency pulses with either different durations (1.25–25 ms) and similar central frequency or different central frequencies (3.6–4.4 kHz) but similar durations were measured to reveal manifestations of the properties of peripheral encoding in auditory perception. Noises with a spiked amplitude spectrum structure were used as maskers. The central frequency and the frequency band of a masker were 4 and 1 kHz, respectively. The central frequencies of a stimulus and a masker being equal, the noise the central frequency of which coincided with the frequency corresponding to a dip of an indented spectrum was called an off_(rip)-frequency masker. Owing to the off_(rip)-masker, stimuli-induced masking thresholds were formed taking into account excitation in a narrow region of a basila membrane and auditory nerve fibers with characteristic frequencies from a narrow range. High-frequency pulses with an envelope in the form of the Gaussian function and sinusoidal filling were used as stimuli. At masker levels of 30 dB above the auditory threshold, frequencies of off_(rip)-masker spectra spikes of 500–2000 Hz, and a central stimulus frequency of 4 kHz, the thresholds of tonal stimuli (25 ms in duration) masking in two out of three probationers were higher than the thresholds of masking of compact stimuli (1.25 ms in duration). In the third probationer, on the contrary, the thresholds of tonal stimuli masking were lower than the thresholds of compact stimuli masking. At masker levels of 50 dB, individual threshold differences disappeared. The obtained results were interpreted in the context of implementation of different methods of auditory encoding of the intensity. The methods were based on either the average frequency of auditory nerve pulsations or the number of fibers participating in the response. The interpretation was also carried out in the context of revealing manifestations of nonlinear properties of basila membrane displacements in auditory thresholds. The fact that the dependence of detection thresholds of compact stimuli on their central frequency in one of the two probationers did not reveal the minimum in case of coincidence of off_(rip)-masker and stimulus frequencies pointed to the presence of an auditory “problem zone” that was likely to be localized at the periphery of the auditory system.     

Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments

Two experiments are described in which frequency selectivity was estimated, in simultaneous and forward masking, for each ear of subjects with moderate (25-60 dB HL) unilateral cochlear hearing losses. In both experiments, the signal level was fixed for a given ear and type of masking (simultaneous or forward), and the masker level was varied to determine threshold, using an adaptive, two-alternative forced-choice procedure. In experiment I, the masker was a noise with a spectral notch centered at the signal frequency (either 1.0 or 1.5 kHz); threshold was determined as a function of notch width. Signal levels were chosen so that the noise level required at threshold for a notch width of zero was similar for the normal and impaired ear of each subject in both simultaneous and forward masking. The function relating threshold to notch width had a steeper slope for the normal ear than for the impaired ear of each subject. For the normal ears, these functions were steeper in forward masking than in simultaneous masking. This difference was interpreted as resulting from suppression. For the impaired ears, significant differences in the same direction were observed for three of the five subjects, but the differences were smaller. In experiment II, psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) were determined in the presence of a fixed notched noise centered at the signal frequency (1.0 kHz). For the normal ears, the PTCs were sharper in forward masking than in simultaneous masking. For the impaired ears, the PTCs were similar in simultaneous and forward masking, but those in forward masking tended to be sharper at masker frequencies far removed from the signal frequency. Overall, the results suggest that suppression is reduced, but not completely absent in cases of moderate cochlear hearing loss.     

Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: the role of temporal structure and peripheral compression

Thresholds for the detection of harmonic complex tones in noise were measured as a function of masker level. The rms level of the masker ranged from 40 to 70 dB SPL in 10-dB steps. The tones had a fundamental frequency (F0) of 62.5 or 250 Hz, and components were added in either cosine or random phase. The complex tones and the noise were bandpass filtered into the same frequency region, from the tenth harmonic up to 5 kHz. In a different condition, the roles of masker and signal were reversed, keeping all other parameters the same; subjects had to detect the noise in the presence of a harmonic tone masker. In both conditions, the masker was either gated synchronously with the 700-ms signal, or it started 400 ms before and stopped 200 ms after the signal. The results showed a large asymmetry in the effectiveness of masking between the tones and noise. Even though signal and masker had the same bandwidth, the noise was a more effective masker than the complex tone. The degree of asymmetry depended on F0, component phase, and the level of the masker. The maximum difference between masked thresholds for tone and noise was about 28 dB; this occurred when the F0 was 62.5 Hz, the components were in cosine phase, and the masker level was 70 dB SPL. In most conditions, the growth-of-masking functions had slopes close to 1 (on a dB versus dB scale). However, for the cosine-phase tone masker with an F0 of 62.5 Hz, a 10-dB increase in masker level led to an increase in masked threshold of the noise of only 3.7 dB, on average. We suggest that the results for this condition are strongly affected by the active mechanism in the cochlea.     

A release from masking by continuous, random, notched noise

Thresholds for 10-ms sinusoids simultaneously masked by bursts of bandpass noise centered on the signal frequency were measured for a wide range of signal frequencies and noise levels. Thresholds were defined as the signal power relative to the masker power at the output of an auditory filter centered on the signal frequency. It was found that the presentation of a continuous random noise, with a spectral notch centered on the signal frequency, produced a reduction in signal thresholds of up to 11 dB. A notched noise spectrum level of 0-5 dB above that of the masker proved most effective in producing a masking release, as measured by a reduction in masked threshold. A release from masking of up to 7 dB could be obtained with a continuous bandpass noise. The most effective spectrum level of this noise was 5 dB below that of the masker. The effect of the continuous notched noise was to reduce signal-to-masker ratios at threshold to about 0 dB, regardless of the threshold in the absence of continuous noise. Thus the greatest release from masking occurred when "unreleased" thresholds were highest. The release from masking is almost complete within 320 ms of notched noise onset, and persists for about 160 ms after notched noise offset, regardless of notched noise level. The phenomenon is similar in many ways to the "overshoot" effect reported by Zwicker [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 37, 653-663 (1965)]. It is argued that both effects can be largely attributed to peripheral short-term adaptation, a mechanism which is also believed to be involved in forward masking.     

Spectral and level effects in noise-on-tone suppression

The effective internal level of a 1-kHz tone at 50 dB SPL was estimated by measuring the forward masking produced on a 10-ms signal tone of the same frequency. Noise containing a spectral notch was then added to the masker tone, and its influence on the effective level of the tone was measured with a variety of noise levels, notch widths, and notch shapes. In experiment 1, the masker tone was centered in the spectral notch, itself centered in a 2-kHz band of noise. As the spectrum level in the noise passbands increased from 6 dB/Hz to 36 dB/Hz, signal threshold decreased, indicating a decrease in masking by the masker tone. This "unmasking" effect of the noise was attributed to suppression of the masker tone by the components in the noise. Unmasking was greatest with the narrowest spectral notch (250 Hz), and decreased to zero as the notch widened to 1500 Hz. Compared to its level when presented alone, the effective internal level of the masker tone could be reduced by up to 30 dB (250-Hz notch, 36 dB/Hz). The relative suppressive strength of individual noise components was estimated in experiment 2, in which the 1-kHz masker tone was located at one edge of a spectral notch, rather than in the center. Noise spectrum level was fixed at 16 dB/Hz. As notch width decreased to zero, on either the high-frequency or low-frequency side of the masker tone, its effective internal level was again reduced by approximately 30 dB. In a tentative analysis, the first derivative of the smoothed threshold function was taken, to provide an estimate of the relative contributions to suppression at 1 kHz of noise components between 250 and 1740 Hz.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Temporal gap resolution in narrow-band noises with center frequencies from 6000-14000 Hz

Temporal resolution was examined in normal-hearing subjects using a broadband noise and five narrow-band noises with center frequencies (fc) spaced 2 kHz apart between 6 and 14 kHz. Bandwidths of the narrow-band signals were equal to 0.16 fc, and broadband noise maskers with spectral notches were used to restrict the listening bands. Subjects used a Békésy procedure to track the minimum signal level required to keep a periodic temporal gap of fixed duration at threshold. Gap durations from 25 ms to the smallest trackable value were tested with each signal to generate performance curves, which showed the relationship between gap resolution and signal level in the low-to-moderate intensity range. Results showed that gap resolution improved progressively with increased signal level to about 35 dB SL, where minimum gap thresholds of about 3 ms were observed for all signals. These results, when combined with previous low-frequency data, indicate that gap threshold decreases systematically with increased signal frequency to about 5 kHz, and asymptotes at 2-3 ms for higher frequencies. In the context of functional models, the frequency effect is qualitatively consistent with the notion that both the auditory filter and a sensory integrator operate in series to govern temporal resolution in audition.     

Role of attention in overshoot: frequency certainty versus uncertainty

Overshoot, the elevation in the threshold for a brief signal that comes on close to masker onset, was measured with signal frequency certain (same frequency on every trial) or uncertain (randomized over trials). In broadband noise, thresholds were higher 2 ms after masker onset than 200 ms later, by 9 dB with frequency certainty, by 6-7 dB with uncertainty. In narrowband noise centered on the signal frequency, thresholds at 2 ms were not elevated with certainty, but were elevated 4-5 dB with uncertainty. Thus, frequency uncertainty leads to less overshoot in broadband noise, to more overshoot in narrowband noise. Reduced overshoot in broadband noise may come about because the masker, given its many frequencies, disrupts focusing at onset as much under certainty as uncertainty. Once the initial disruption dissipates, threshold is lower with certainty so overshoot is greater. In contrast, a narrowband noise with frequencies only near the signal does not disrupt focusing when the signal frequency is known beforehand, so overshoot is absent. When frequency is uncertain, the narrowband noise serves to focus attention on the signal frequency; as this requires time, detection near noise onset is poorer than later on, so overshoot is present.     

Simultaneous masking and unmasking with bandlimited noise

This study examines how simultaneous masking of a tone by bandlimited noise may be affected by nonlinear interactions among spectral components of the noise. Simultaneous masking patterns (signal threshold versus signal frequency) were obtained with three types of maskers: (A) a narrow-band noise, 50 Hz wide with variable center frequency fv, (B) pairs of narrow-band noises, each band 50 Hz wide with center frequencies fl and fu, and (C) wide-band noise formed by filling the spectral gap between the two bands of (B). The variable frequency fv was set to 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 kHz: fl was fixed at 1.0 kHz, and fu had values of 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 kHz. In most conditions, the two-band maskers and the wideband maskers produced more masking than would be predicted from the masking produced by the single narrow-band maskers. For certain signal frequencies below the maskers, adding noise to fill the spectral gap of the two-band masker actually resulted in a 3- to 15-dB release from masking. These results reveal factors that may operate to confound modern measures of frequency selectivity.     

Binaural modulation masking

Modulation thresholds were measured in three subjects for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) wideband noise (the signal) in the presence of a second amplitude-modulated wideband noise (the masker). In monaural conditions (Mm-Sm) masker and signal were presented to only one ear; in binaural conditions (M0-S pi) the masker was presented diotically while the phase of modulation of the SAM noise signal was inverted in one ear relative to the other. In experiment 1 masker modulation frequency (fm) was fixed at 16 Hz, and signal modulation frequency (fs) was varied from 2-512 Hz. For monaural presentation, masking generally decreased as fs diverged from fm, although there was a secondary increase in masking for very low signal modulation frequencies, as reported previously [Bacon and Grantham, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 2575-2580 (1989)]. The binaural masking patterns did not show this low-frequency upturn: binaural thresholds continued to improve as fs decreased from 16 to 2 Hz. Thus, comparing masked monaural and masked binaural thresholds, there was an average binaural advantage, or masking-level difference (MLD) of 9.4 dB at fs = 2 Hz and 5.3 dB at fs = 4 Hz. In addition, there were positive MLDs for the on-frequency condition (fm = fs = 16 Hz: average MLD = 4.4 dB) and for the highest signal frequency tested (fs = 512 Hz: average MLD = 7.3 dB). In experiment 2 the signal was a SAM noise (fs = 16 Hz), and the masker was a wideband noise, amplitude-modulated by a narrow band of noise centered at fs. There was no effect on monaural or binaural thresholds as masker modulator bandwidth was varied from 4 to 20 Hz (the average MLD remained constant at 8.0 dB), which suggests that the observed "tuning" for modulation may be based on temporal pattern discrimination and not on a critical-band-like filtering mechanism. In a final condition the masker modulator was a 10-Hz-wide band of noise centered at the 64-Hz signal modulation frequency. The average MLD in this case was 7.4 dB. The results are discussed in terms of various binaural capacities that probably play a role in binaural release from modulation masking, including detection of varying interaural intensity differences (IIDs) and discrimination of interaural correlation.     

Modeling the influence of inherent envelope fluctuations in simultaneous masking experiments

Masked thresholds are measured and simulated for bandpass-noise signals ranging in bandwidth from 4 to 256 Hz in the presence of a masking bandpass noise also ranging in bandwidth from 4 to 256 Hz. Signal and masker are centered at 2 kHz. To investigate the role of temporal processing in simultaneous masking, simulations were performed with the modulation-filterbank model by Dau et al. [J. Acoust. Soc Am. 102, 2906-2919 (1997)]. For a fixed masker bandwidth, thresholds are independent of the signal bandwidth as long as the signal bandwidth does not exceed the masker bandwidth and thresholds decrease with increasing masker bandwidth in those conditions. A simple modulation-low-pass filter (energy integrator) would be sufficient to describe the experimental results in those conditions. In contrast, the processing by a modulation filterbank is necessary to account for the conditions of "asymmetry of masking," where thresholds for signals with bandwidths larger than the masker bandwidth are much lower than those for the reversed condition. In those conditions, the modulation-filterbank model is able to use the inherent higher modulation frequencies of the signal as an additional cue.