Photolysis and Thermolysis of Platinum(IV) 2,2′‐Bipyridine Complexes Lead to Identical Platinum(II)–DNA Adducts

Two Pt^IV and two Pt^II complexes containing a 2,2′‐bipyridine ligand were treated with a short DNA oligonucleotide under light irradiation at 37 °C or in the dark at 37 and 50 °C. Photolysis and thermolysis of the Pt^IV complexes led to spontaneous reduction of the Pt^IV to the corresponding Pt^II complexes and to binding of Pt^II 2,2′‐bipyridine complexes to N7 of guanine. When the reduction product was [Pt(bpy)Cl₂], formation of bis‐oligonucleotide adducts was observed, whereas [Pt(bpy)(MeNH₂)Cl]⁺ gave monoadducts, with chloride ligands substituted in both cases. Neither in the dark nor under light irradiation was the reductive elimination process of these Pt^IV complexes accompanied by oxidative DNA damage. This work raises the question of the stability of photoactivatable Pt^IV complexes toward moderate heating conditions.     

Synthesis,spectral investigation and biological interphase of drug‐based cytotoxic square pyramidal coordination compounds

We have synthesized ciprofloxacin‐based metal complexes of bipyridine derivatives [Cu(CFL)(Aⁿ)Cl].2H₂O (where CFL = ciprofloxacin and A = bipyridines e.g. A¹ = 4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐6‐p‐tolyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine, A⁶ = 4‐(4‐(benzyloxy)phenyl)‐6‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine, etc.). The ligands and complexes were characterized using analytical (C, H, N elemental analysis, TGA and magnetic measurement) and spectroscopic methods (¹H and ¹³C NMR, FT‐IR, fast atom bombardment mass and reflectance spectroscopy). The products were evaluated by screening for DNA interaction activity on herring sperm DNA and studies suggest intercalative mode of DNA binding. The antimicrobial activity was determined in terms of minimum inhibitory concentration. Superoxide dismutase mimic studies were performed using the NADH/PMS/NBT system. The brine shrimp bioassay was also carried out to study the in vitro cytotoxic properties of the synthesized metal complexes. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Three structures of dispirooxindole derivatives generated in situ through a three‐component one‐pot strategy with complete regio‐ and stereoselectivity

The challenging molecular architecture of spirooxindoles is appealing to chemists because it evokes novel synthetic strategies that address configurational demands and provides platforms for further reaction development. The [3+2] cycloaddition of the carbonyl ylide with arylideneoxindole via a five‐membered cyclic transition state gave a novel class of dispirooxindole derivatives, namely tert‐butyl 4′‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐1′′‐methyl‐2,2′′‐dioxo‐5′‐phenyl‐4′,5′‐dihydrodispiro[indoline‐3,2′‐furan‐3′,3′′‐indoline]‐1‐carboxylate, C₃₆H₃₁BrN₂O, (Ia), 5′‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐1,1′′‐dimethyl‐4′‐phenyl‐4′,5′‐dihydrodispiro[indoline‐3,2′‐furan‐3′,3′′‐indoline]‐2,2′′‐dione, C₃₂H₂₅BrN₂O₃, (Ib), and tert‐butyl 1′′‐methyl‐2,2′′‐dioxo‐4′‐phenyl‐5′‐(p‐tolyl)‐4′,5′‐dihydrodispiro[indoline‐3,2′‐furan‐3′,3′′‐indoline]‐1‐carboxylate, C₃₇H₃₄N₂O₅, (Ic). Crystal structure analyses of these dispirooxindoles revealed the formation of two diastereoisomers selectively and confirmed their relative stereochemistry (SSSR and RRRS). In all three structures, intramolecular C—H...O and π–π interactions between oxindole and dihydrofuran rings are the key factors governing the regio‐ and stereoselectivity, and in the absence of conventional hydrogen bonds, their crystal packings are strengthened by intermolecular C—H...π interactions.     

Tuning the Excited—state Properties of Cyclometalated Platinum（Ⅱ）Complexes of 6—Pheny1—2,2’bipyridine by Ancillary Acetylide Ligand

A series of luminescent cyclometalated platinum(Ⅱ）complexes,(C^N^N)Pt(C≡CR)[HC^N^N=4-(4-tolyl)-6-phenyl-2,2’-bipyridine;R=4-chlorophenyl(1),phenyl(2) and 4-tolyl(3)],were synthesized,and their spectroscopic properties have been examined.These complexes are brightly emissive both in fluid solution and in the solid state,attributed to triplet metal-to-ligand charge transfer(^3MLCT)state.The excited state energy can be tuned by ancillary acetylide ligands.The emission lifetimes in dichloromethand solution at room temperature were up to 1.64 μs and the emission quantum yields were in the range of 0.03-0.15.     

Synthesis,characterization and biological application of cyclometalated heteroleptic platinum(II) complexes

A series of square planar cyclometalated heteroleptic platinum(II) complexes of the type [(C^N)Pt(O^O)] [where, O^O is a β‐diketonato ligand of acetylacetone (acac), C^N = cyclometalating 7‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐5‐phenylpyrazolo[1,5‐a]pyrimidine (L¹), 7‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐5‐phenylpyrazolo[1,5‐a]pyrimidine (L²), 7‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐5‐phenylpyrazolo[1,5‐a]pyrimidine (L³), 7‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐5‐phenylpyrazolo[1,5‐a]pyrimidine (L⁴), 5‐phenyl‐7‐(p‐tolyl)pyrazolo[1,5‐a]pyrimidine (L⁵)] have been design, synthesized and characterized. All compounds have been screened for biological studies like in vitro antibacterial, in vitro cytotoxicity, cellular level cytotoxicity, absorption titration, viscosity measurements, fluorescence quenching analysis, molecular docking and DNA nuclease. The intrinsic binding constants (K_b) of compounds with HS‐DNA has been obtained in range of 2.892–0.242 × 10⁵ M^?1. All the compounds bound with HS DNA by partial intercalative mode of binding. MIC study has been carried out against Gram^(+ve) and Gram^(?ve) bacterial species. In vitro cytotoxicity against brine shrimp lethality bioassay has been also carried out. The LC₅₀ values of the ligands and complexes have been found in range of 56.49–120.22 μg/mL and 6.71–11.96 μg/mL, respectively.     

Structural consequences of weak interactions in dispirooxindole derivatives

Spiro scaffolds are being increasingly utilized in drug discovery due to their inherent three‐dimensionality and structural variations, resulting in new synthetic routes to introduce spiro building blocks into more pharmaceutically active molecules. Multicomponent cascade reactions, involving the in situ generation of carbonyl ylides from α‐diazocarbonyl compounds and aldehydes, and 1,3‐dipolar cycloadditon with 3‐arylideneoxindoles gave a novel class of dispirooxindole derivatives, namely 1,1′′‐dibenzyl‐5′‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐4′‐phenyl‐4′,5′‐dihydrodispiro[indoline‐3,2′‐furan‐3′,3′′‐indoline]‐2,2′′‐dione, C₄₄H₃₃ClN₂O₃, (I), 1′′‐acetyl‐1‐benzyl‐5′‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐4′‐phenyl‐4′,5′‐dihydrodispiro[indoline‐3,2′‐furan‐3′,3′′‐indoline]‐2,2′′‐dione, C₃₉H₂₉ClN₂O₄, (II), 1′′‐acetyl‐1‐benzyl‐4′,5′‐diphenyl‐4′,5′‐dihydrodispiro[indoline‐3,2′‐furan‐3′,3′′‐indoline]‐2,2′′‐dione, C₃₉H₃₀N₂O₄, (III), and 1′′‐acetyl‐1‐benzyl‐4′,5′‐diphenyl‐4′,5′‐dihydrodispiro[indoline‐3,2′‐furan‐3′,3′′‐indoline]‐2,2′′‐dione acetonitrile hemisolvate, C₃₉H₃₀N₂O₄·0.5C₂H₃N, (IV). All four compounds exist as racemic mixtures of the SSSR and RRRS stereoisomers. In these structures, the two H atoms of the dihydrofuran ring and the two substituted oxindole rings are in a trans orientation, facilitating intramolecular C—H...O and π–π interactions. These weak interactions play a prominent role in the structural stability and aid the highly regio‐ and diastereoselective synthesis. In each of the four structures, the molecular assembly in the crystal is also governed by weak noncovalent interactions. Compound (IV) is the solvated analogue of (III) and the two compounds show similar structural features.     

Acid‐, Water‐ and High‐Temperature‐Stable Ruthenium Complexes for the Total Catalytic Deoxygenation of Glycerol to Propane

The ruthenium aqua complexes [Ru(H₂O)₂(bipy)₂](OTf)₂, [cis‐Ru(6,6′‐Cl₂‐bipy)₂(OH₂)₂](OTf)₂, [Ru(H₂O)₂(phen)₂](OTf)₂, [Ru(H₂O)₃(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpy)](OTf)₂ and [Ru(H₂O)₃(Phterpy)](OTf)₂ (bipy=2,2′‐bipyridine; OTf^?=triflate; phen=phenanthroline; terpy= terpyridine; Phterpy=4′‐phenyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine) are water‐ and acid‐stable catalysts for the hydrogenation of aldehydes and ketones in sulfolane solution. In the presence of HOS(O)₂CF₃ (triflic acid) as a dehydration co‐catalyst they directly convert 1,2‐hexanediol to n‐hexanol and hexane. The terpyridine complexes are stable and active as catalysts at temperatures ≥250 °C and in either aqueous sulfolane solution or pure water convert glycerol into n‐propanol and ultimately propane as the final reaction product in up to quantitative yield. For the terpy complexes the active catalyst is postulated to be a carbonyl species [(4′‐R‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpy)Ru(CO)(H₂O)₂](OTf)₂ (R=H, Ph) formed by the decarbonylation of aldehydes (hexanal for 1,2‐hexanediol and 3‐hydroxypropanal for glycerol) generated in the reaction mixture through acid‐catalyzed dehydration. The structure of the dimeric complex [{(4′‐phenyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpy)Ru(CO)}₂(μ‐OCH₃)₂](OTf)₂ has been determined by single crystal X‐ray crystallography (Space group P (a=8.2532(17); b=12.858(3); c=14.363(3) Å; α=64.38(3); β=77.26(3); γ = 87.12(3)°, R=4.36 %).     

Synthesis,characterization and DNA binding and photocleavage studies of [Ru(bpy)2BDPPZ]2+, [Ru(dmb)2BDPPZ]2+ and [Ru(phen)2BDPPZ]2+ complexes and their antimicrobial activity

Polypyridyl ligand 9a,13a‐dihydro‐4,5,9,14‐tetraaza‐benzo[b]triphenylene‐11‐yl)‐phenyl‐methanone (BDPPZ) and its complexes [Ru(bpy)₂BDPPZ]²⁺, [Ru(dmb)₂BDPPZ]²⁺ and [Ru(phen)₂BDPPZ]²⁺ (where bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine, dmb = 4,4′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine, phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR, UV–vis, ¹H‐NMR, ¹³C‐NMR and mass spectra. The DNA‐binding properties of the complexes were investigated by absorption, emission, melting temperature and viscosity measurements. Experimental results indicate that the three complexes can intercalate into DNA base pairs. Photo activated cleavage of pBR‐322 DNA by the three complexes was also studied. Further, all three Ru(II) complexes synthesized were screened for their antimicrobial activity. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A chalcone showing positional disorder,two related diarylcyclohexenones showing enantiomeric disorder and a related hydroxyterphenyl,all derived from simple carbonyl precursors

Four compounds are reported, all of which lie along a versatile reaction pathway which leads from simple carbonyl compounds to terphenyls. (2E)‐1‐(2,4‐Dichlorophenyl)‐3‐ [4‐(prop‐1‐en‐2‐yl)phenyl]prop‐2‐en‐1‐one, C₁₈H₁₄Cl₂O, (I), prepared from 4‐(prop‐1‐en‐2‐yl)benzaldehyde and 2,4‐dichloroacetophenone, exhibits disorder over two sets of atomic sites having occupancies of 0.664 (6) and 0.336 (6). The related chalcone (2E)‐3‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐1‐(4‐fluorophenyl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐one reacts with acetone to produce (5RS)‐3‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐5‐[4‐(propan‐2‐yl)phenyl]cyclohex‐2‐en‐1‐one, C₂₁H₂₁ClO, (II), which exhibits enantiomeric disorder with occupancies at the reference site of 0.662 (4) and 0.338 (4) for the (5R) and (5S) forms; the same chalcone reacts with methyl 3‐oxobutanoate to give methyl (1RS,6SR)‐4‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐6‐[4‐(propan‐2‐yl)phenyl]‐2‐oxocyclohex‐3‐ene‐1‐carboxylate, C₂₃H₂₃ClO₃, (III), where the reference site contains both (1R,6S) and (1S,6R) forms with occupancies of 0.923 (3) and 0.077 (3), respectively. Oxidation, using 2,3‐dichloro‐5,6‐dicyano‐1,4‐benzoquinone, of ethyl (1RS,6SR)‐6‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐2‐oxocyclohex‐3‐ene‐1‐carboxylate, prepared in a similar manner to (II) and (III), produces ethyl 4′′‐bromo‐4‐fluoro‐5′‐hydroxy‐1,1′:3′,1′′‐terphenyl‐4′‐carboxylate, C₂₁H₁₆BrFO₃, (IV), which crystallizes with Z′ = 2 in the space group P. There are no significant intermolecular interactions in the structures of compounds (I) and (II), but for the major disorder component of compound (III), the molecules are linked into sheets by a combination of C—H...O and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds. The two independent molecules of compound (IV) form two different centrosymmetric dimers, one built from inversion‐related pairs of C—H...O hydrogen bonds and the other from inversion‐related pairs of C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds. Comparisons are made with related compounds.     

Intermolecular C—H...O and C—H...X interactions in substituted spiroacenaphthylene structures

In the three spiroacenaphthylene structures 5′′‐[(E)‐2,3‐dichlorobenzylidene]‐7′‐(2,3‐dichlorophenyl)‐1′′‐methyldispiro[acenaphthylene‐1,5′‐pyrrolo[1,2‐c][1,3]thiazole‐6′,3′′‐piperidine]‐2,4′′‐dione, C₃₅H₂₆Cl₄N₂O₂S, (I), 5′′‐[(E)‐4‐fluorobenzylidene]‐7′‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐1′′‐methyldispiro[acenaphthylene‐1,5′‐pyrrolo[1,2‐c][1,3]thiazole‐6′,3′′‐piperidine]‐2,4′′‐dione, C₃₅H₂₈F₂N₂O₂S, (II), and 5′′‐[(E)‐4‐bromobenzylidene]‐7′‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐1′′‐methyldispiro[acenaphthylene‐1,5′‐pyrrolo[1,2‐c][1,3]thiazole‐6′,3′′‐piperidine]‐2,4′′‐dione, C₃₅H₂₈Br₂N₂O₂S, (III), the substituted aryl groups are 2,3‐dichloro‐, 4‐fluoro‐ and 4‐bromophenyl, respectively. The six‐membered piperidine ring in all three structures adopts a half‐chair conformation, the thiazolidine ring adopts a slightly twisted envelope and the pyrrolidine ring an envelope conformation; in each case, the C atom linking the rings is the flap atom. In all three structures, weak intramolecular C—H...O interactions are present. The crystal packing is stabilized through a number of intermolecular C—H...O and C—H...X interactions, where X = Cl in (I) and F or S in (II), and C—H...O interactions are observed predominantly in (III). In all three structures, molecules are linked through centrosymmetric ring motifs, further tailored through a relay of C—H...X [Cl in (I), Br in (II) and O in (III)] interactions.     

Judicious Ligand Design in Ruthenium Polypyridyl CO2 Reduction Catalysts to Enhance Reactivity by Steric and Electronic Effects

A series of Ru^II polypyridyl complexes of the structural design [Ru^II(R?tpy)(NN)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ (R?tpy=2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (R=H) or 4,4′,4′′‐tri‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (R=tBu); NN=2,2′‐bipyridine with methyl substituents in various positions) have been synthesized and analyzed for their ability to function as electrocatalysts for the reduction of CO₂ to CO. Detailed electrochemical analyses establish how substitutions at different ring positions of the bipyridine and terpyridine ligands can have profound electronic and, even more importantly, steric effects that determine the complexes’ reactivities. Whereas electron‐donating groups para to the heteroatoms exhibit the expected electronic effect, with an increase in turnover frequencies at increased overpotential, the introduction of a methyl group at the ortho position of NN imposes drastic steric effects. Two complexes, [Ru^II(tpy)(6‐mbpy)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ (trans‐[ 3 ]²⁺; 6‐mbpy=6‐methyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine) and [Ru^II(tBu?tpy)(6‐mbpy)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ (trans‐[ 4 ]²⁺), in which the methyl group of the 6‐mbpy ligand is trans to the CH₃CN ligand, show electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction at a previously unreactive oxidation state of the complex. This low overpotential pathway follows an ECE mechanism (electron transfer–chemical reaction–electron transfer), and is a direct result of steric interactions that facilitate CH₃CN ligand dissociation, CO₂ coordination, and ultimately catalytic turnover at the first reduction potential of the complexes. All experimental observations are rigorously corroborated by DFT calculations.     

Exploiting the versatility of pyridyl ligands for the preparation of diorganotin (IV) adducts: spectral,crystallographic and Hirshfeld surface analysis studies

Diorganotin (IV) complexes SnR₂X₂ (R = Me, Ph; X = Cl, NCS) form a series of versatile complexes when react with bidentate substituted pyridyl ligands. The reaction of dimethyltin dichloride with 5,5′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine (5,5′‐Me₂bpy) resulted in the formation of [SnMe₂Cl₂(5,5′‐Me₂bpy)] ( 1 ). Moreover, the reaction of SnMe₂(NSC)₂ with 4,4′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine (bu₂bpy), 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen) and 4,7‐diphenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline (bphen) affords the hexa‐coordinated complexes [SnMe₂(NCS)₂(bu₂bpy)] ( 2 ), [SnMe₂(NCS)₂(phen)] ( 3 ) and [SnMe₂(NCS)₂(bphen)] ( 4 ), respectively. The resulting complexes have been characterized using elemental analysis, IR, multinuclear NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn) and DEPT‐135^° NMR spectroscopy. On the other hand, the reaction of diphenyltin dichloride with 2,2′‐biquinoline (biq) and 4,7‐phenantroline (4,7‐phen) led to the formation of polymeric complexes of [SnPh₂Cl₂(4,7‐phen)]_n ( 5 ) and [SnPh₂Cl₂(biq)]_n ( 6 ). The NMR spectra, however, reveal the ligand lability in solution and suggest a coordination number of 5 . The X‐ray crystal structures of complexes [SnMe₂Cl₂(5,5′‐Me₂bpy)] ( 1 ), [SnMe₂(NCS)₂(bu₂bpy)] ( 2 ) and [SnMe₂(NCS)₂(bphen)] ( 4 ) have been determined which reveal that the geometry around the tin atom is distorted octahedral with trans‐[SnMe₂] configuration. Interestingly, the crystal structure of (H₂biq)₂[SnPh₂Cl₄]?2CHCl₃ ( 7 ) was characterized by X‐ray crystallography from a chloroform solution of [SnPh₂Cl₂(biq)]_n ( 6 ) indicating the formation of doubly protonated [H₂biq]⁺ and [Ph₂SnCl₄]^2? which are stabilized by a network of hydrogen bonds with a feature of trans‐[SnPh₂]. The 3D Hirshfeld surface analysis and 2D fingerprint maps were used for quantitative mapping out of the intermolecular interactions for 1 , 2 , 4 and 7 which show the presence of π‐π and hydrogen bonding interactions which are associated between donor and acceptor atoms (N, S, Cl) in the solid state.     

Emissive or Nonemissive? A Theoretical Analysis of the Phosphorescence Efficiencies of Cyclometalated Platinum(II) Complexes

We herein report a theoretical analysis based on a density functional theory/time‐dependent density functional theory (DFT/TDDFT) approach to understand the different phosphorescence efficiencies of a family of cyclometalated platinum(II) complexes: [Pt(NCN)Cl] ( 1 ; NCN=1,3‐bis(2‐pyridyl)phenyl^?), [Pt(CNN)Cl] ( 2 ; CNN=6‐phenyl‐2,2′‐bipyridyl^?), [Pt(CNC)(CNPh)] ( 3 ; CNC=2,6‐diphenylpyridyl^2?), [Pt(R‐CNN)Cl] ( 4 ; R‐CNN=3‐(6′‐(2′′‐naphthyl)‐2′‐pyridyl)isoquinolinyl^?), and [Pt(R‐CNC)(CNPh)] ( 5 ; R‐CNC=2,6‐bis(2′‐naphthyl)pyridyl^2?). By considering both the spin–orbit coupling (SOC) and the electronic structures of these complexes at their respective optimized singlet ground (S₀) and first triplet ( ) excited states, we were able to rationalize the experimental findings that 1) 1 is a strong emitter while its isomer 2 is only weakly emissive in CH₂Cl₂ solution at room temperature; 2) although the cyclometalated ligand of 3 has a higher ligand‐field strength than that of 1 , 3 is nonemissive in CH₂Cl₂ solution at 298 K; and 3) extension of π conjugation at the lateral aryl rings of the cyclometalated ligands of 2 and 3 to give 4 and 5 , respectively, leads to increased emission quantum yields under the same conditions. We found that Jahn–Teller and pseudo‐Jahn–Teller effects are operative in complexes 2 and 3 , respectively, on going from the optimized S₀ ground state to the optimized excited state, and thus lead to large excited‐state structural distortions and hence fast nonradiative decay. Furthermore, a strong‐field ligand may push the two different occupied d orbitals so far apart that the SOC effect is small and the radiative decay rate is slow. This work is an example of electronic‐structure‐driven tuning of the phosphorescence efficiency, and the DFT/TDDFT approach is demonstrated to be a versatile tool for the design of phosphorescent materials with target characteristics.     

Mononuclear vs. binuclear carboxylates of copper(II) with 2,2′‐bipyridine: Synthesis,characterization, structural description,and properties

Two new copper(II) carboxylate complexes with 2,2′‐bipyridine and para‐nitrophenyl acetate (complex 1 ) and phenyl acetate (complex 2 ) have been synthesized; isolated in quantitative yield; and characterized using fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FT‐IR), electron paramagnetic resonance, absorption spectroscopy, electrochemistry, and powder and single crystal X‐ray diffraction (XRD) techniques. Being mononuclear, the geometry around copper in complex 1 is a Jahn–Teller distorted octahedral, while complex 2 is binuclear with slightly distorted square pyramidal geometry around both copper ions. Powder XRD indicated several peaks in spectra of both complexes, which coincided with their theoretical spectra. FT‐IR results of the carboxylate stretching frequency were in accordance with the single crystal structure data. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra of complexes 1 and 2 yielded g_┴ values of 2.06161 and 2.24623 and 1.94959, respectively, indicating a localized electron in b₁ (d _x²_–y²‐orbital). Ultra‐violet (UV)–visible spectroscopy and electrochemistry helped in characterization, as well as in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)‐binding ability of the complexes, yielding DNA‐binding constant values = 1.351 × 10⁴ and 1.361 × 10⁴ and 1.820 × 10⁴ and 2.426 × 10⁴ M^?1, respectively, for complexes 1 and 2 . The complexes demonstrate good biological potential.     

Synthesis and photophysical properties of novel amphiphilic ruthenium (II) complexes containing 4,4′‐dialkylaminomethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridyl ligands

The synthesis of a number of new 2,2′‐bipyridine ligands functionalized with bulky amino side groups is reported. Three homoleptic polypyridyl ruthenium (II) complexes, [Ru(L)₃]²⁺ 2(PF₆^?), where L is 4,4′‐dioctylaminomethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine (Ru4a), 4,4′‐didodecylaminomethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine (Ru4b) and 4,4′‐dioctadodecylaminomethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine (Ru4c), have been synthesized. These compounds were characterized and their photophysical properties examined. The electronic spectra of three complexes show pyridyl π → π* transitions in the UV region and metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer bands in the visible region. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

2′‐Hydroxy‐4′′‐dimethylaminochalcone

The title compound, 3‐[4‐(di­methyl­amino)­phenyl]‐1‐(2‐hydroxy­phenyl)­prop‐2‐en‐1‐one, C₁₇H₁₇NO₂, is a chalcone derivative substituted by 2′‐hydroxyl and 4′′‐di­methyl­amino groups. The crystal structure indicates that the aniline and hydroxy­phenyl groups are nearly coplanar, with a dihedral angle of 10.32 (16)° between their phenyl rings. The molecular planarity of this substituted chalcone is strongly affected by the 2′‐hydroxyl group.     

High Yield Synthesis,Molecular Structure,and Reactions of the 16‐Electron Norbornadiene Complex, [WI2(CO)2(nbd)]

Reaction of equimolar amounts of [WI₂(CO)₃(NCMe)₂] and norbornadiene (nbd) in toluene at 95 °C for 3h gave the 16‐electron crystallographically characterised complex, [WI₂(CO)₂(nbd)] (1) in 96 % yield. The structure of 1 has a distorted octahedral geometry, with the two cis‐ iodo ligands opposite to the two alkene groups in the equatorial plane, with the carbonyl groups in the axial sites. Treatment of 1 with two equivalents of PhC₂Ph in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature afforded the bis(alkyne) complex [WI₂(CO)₂(η²—PhC₂Ph)₂] (2) . Equimolar quantities of 1 and 4, 4′‐bipyridine react in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature to yield the seven‐coordinate complex, [WI₂(CO)₂(4, 4′‐bipyridine)(nbd)] (3) .     

DNA interaction and cleavage studies of ancillary chiral ligand and N,N‐donor ligands coordinated platinum(II) complexes

Four new platinum(II) complexes [Pt(dpen)(bpy)](ClO₄)₂ ( 1 ) , [Pt(dpen)(phen)](ClO₄)₂ ( 2 ), [Pt(dpen)(dpq)](ClO₄)₂ ( 3 ) and [Pt(dpen)(dppz)](ClO₄)₂ ( 4 ) comprising of different N,N‐donor ligands, viz., 2,2′‐bipyridine (bpy), 1,l0‐phenanthroline (phen), dipyridoquinoxaline (dpq), dipyrido‐[3,2‐d:2¢,3¢‐f –phenazine] (dppz), and chiral ancillary ligand 1R,2R ‐1,2‐diphenylethylenediamine (dpen) have been synthesized and characterized. The interaction of these complexes 1–4 with calf‐thymus DNA (CT‐DNA) has been explored using absorption, circular dichroism spectral and cyclic voltammetric studies. The absorption spectrum of complex 4 with dppz ligand exhibits a major red shift with an overall hypochromic as well as a hyperchromic effect in the presence of DNA, other complexes ( 1 – 3 ) show only hypochromism. From these absorption spectral studies, the intercalative ability of the complexes follows the order as, 4  >  3  >  2  >  1 , which is further confirmed by CD and cyclic voltammetry measurements. CD spectral studies show that DNA becomes more A ‐like upon interaction with the complexes 1 & 2 but the complexes 3 & 4 bring about B ‐form to Z ‐ form DNA conformational transition. The DNA cleavage study of these Pt(II) complexes 1–4 carried out by gel electrophoresis revealed that complexes 1–4 can cleave super coiled (SC) pUC18 DNA efficiently into open circular form (form II) under hydrolytic and oxidative conditions.     

PtII Complexes with 6‐(5‐Trifluoromethyl‐Pyrazol‐3‐yl)‐2,2′‐Bipyridine Terdentate Chelating Ligands: Synthesis,Characterization, and Luminescent Properties

A series of Pt^II complexes Pt(fpbpy)Cl ( 1 ), Pt(fpbpy)(OAc) ( 2 ), Pt(fpbpy)(NHCOMe) ( 3 ), Pt(fpbpy)(NHCOEt) ( 4 ), and [Pt(fpbpy)(NCMe)](BF₄) ( 5 ) with deprotonated 6‐(5‐trifluoromethyl‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine terdentate ligand are prepared, among which 1 is converted to complexes 2 – 5 by a simple ligand substitution. Alternatively, acetamide complex 3 is prepared by hydrolysis of acetonitrile complex 5 , while the back conversion from 3 to 1 is regulated by the addition of HCl solution, showing the reaction sequence 1 → 5 → 3 → 1 . Multilayer OLED devices are successfully fabricated by using triphenyl‐(4‐(9‐phenyl‐9H‐fluoren‐9‐yl)phenyl) silane (TPSi‐F) as host material and with doping concentrations of 1 varying from 7 to 100 %. The electroluminescence showed a substantial red‐shifting versus the normal photoluminescence detected in solution. Moreover, at a doping concentration of 28 %, the device showed a saturated red luminescence with a maximum external quantum yield of 8.5 % at 20 mA cm^?2 and a peak luminescence of 47 543 cd m^?2 at 18.5 V.     

Monodentate and bridging behaviour of the sulfur‐containing ligand 4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine in two discrete zinc(II) complexes with acetylacetonate

The Zn complexes bis(acetylacetonato‐κ²O,O′)bis{4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine‐κN¹}zinc(II), [Zn(C₅H₇O₂)₂(C₂₂H₁₇N₃S)₂], (I), and {μ‐4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine‐κ²N¹:N^1′′}bis[bis(acetylacetonato‐κ²O,O′)zinc(II)], [Zn₂(C₅H₇O₂)₄(C₂₂H₁₇N₃S)], (II), are discrete entities with different nuclearities. Compound (I) consists of two centrosymmetrically related monodentate 4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine (L1) ligands binding to one Zn^II atom sitting on an inversion centre and two centrosymmetrically related chelating acetylacetonate (acac) groups which bind via carbonyl O‐atom donors, giving an N₂O₄ octahedral environment for Zn^II. Compound (II), however, consists of a bis‐monodentate L1 ligand bridging two Zn^II atoms from two different Zn(acac)₂ fragments. Intra‐ and intermolecular interactions are weak, mainly of the C—H...π and π–π types, mediating similar layered structures. In contrast to related structures in the literature, sulfur‐mediated nonbonding interactions in (II) do not seem to have any significant influence on the supramolecular structure.