Reactivity Studies of η5‐ Indenyl and η5‐Cp* Ruthenium(II) Complexes towards some Polypyridyl Ligands

The reaction of [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl], where; L³ = C₉H₇ ( 1 ), C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ( 2 ) with acetonitrile in the presence of [NH₄][PF₆] yielded cationic complexes [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)][PF₆]; L³= C₉H₇ ([3]PF₆) and L³ = C₅Me₅ ([4]PF₆), respectively. Complexes [3]PF₆ and [4]PF₆ reacts with some polypyridyl ligands viz, 2,3‐bis (α‐pyridyl) pyrazine (bpp), 2,3‐bis (α‐pyridyl) quinoxaline (bpq) yielding the complexes of the formulation [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)(L²)]PF₆ where; L³ = C₉H₇, L² = bpp, ([5]PF₆), L³ = C₉H₇, L² = bpq, ([6]PF₆); L³ = C₅Me₅, L² = bpp, ([7]PF₆) and bpq, ([8]PF₆), respectively. However reaction of [(η⁵‐C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)][PF₆] ([3]PF₆) with the sterically demanding polypyridyl ligands, viz. 2,4,6‐tris(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine (tptz) or tetra‐2‐pyridyl‐1,4‐pyrazine (tppz) leads to the formation of unexpected complexes [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L²)(CH₃CN)][PF₆]₂; L² = tppz ([9](PF₆)₂), tptz ([11](PF₆)₂) and [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L²)Cl][PF₆]; L² = tppz ([10]PF₆), tptz ([12]PF₆). The complexes were isolated as their hexafluorophosphate salts. They have been characterized on the basis of micro analytical and spectroscopic data. The crystal structures of the representative complexes were established by X‐ray crystallography.     

Mononuclear Complexes of Platinum Group Metals Containing η6‐ and η5‐Cyclic Π‐Perimeter Hydrocarbon and Pyridylpyrazolyl Derivatives: Syntheses and Structural Studies

Piano‐stool‐shaped platinum group metal compounds, stable in the solid state and in solution, which are based on 2‐(5‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine ( L ) with the formulas [(η⁶‐arene)Ru( L )Cl]PF₆ {arene = C₆H₆ ( 1 ), p‐cymene ( 2 ), and C₆Me₆, ( 3 )}, [(η⁶‐C₅Me₅)M( L )Cl]PF₆ {M = Rh ( 4 ), Ir ( 5 )}, and [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 6 ), [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Os(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 7 ), [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 8 ), and [(η⁵‐C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 9 ) were prepared by a general method and characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The molecular structures of compounds 4 and 5 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In each compound the metal is connected to N1 and N11 in a k² manner.     

Ruthenium(II)‐Komplexe mit orthometallierten O'Donnell Schiffbasen (Diphenylmethylenglycinester) [1]

Ruthenium(II) Complexes of Orthometallated O'Donnell Schiff Bases (Diphenylmethylene Glycine Esters) [1] The reaction of diphenyl methylene glycine esters with [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] gives the orthometallated complexes [Ru(PPh₃)₂(Cl){(C₆H₄)(C₆H₅)C=NCH₂CO₂R}] (R = H, Et, CMe₃) in which the ester group is coordinated to the ruthenium atom and which were characterized by IR, NMR, MS data and by cyclovoltammetry.     

A novel cis-push–pull effect in cycloruthenated azobenzene thiocarbonyl-containing complexes: crystal and molecular structures of [RuX(CS)(η-C,N-C6H4N=NPh)(PPh3)2](X=Cl, I)

Treatment of [RuHCl(CS)(PPh₃)₃] with Hg(o-C₆H₄N=NC₆H₅)₂ affords [RuCl(CS)(η²C,N-o-C₆H₄N=NC₆H₅)(PPh₃)₂] (1) in good yield, where the cyclometallated azobenzene ligand coordinates through an ortho-C and one azo-N to give a five-membered chelate ring. Reaction of 1 with AgNO₃ followed by NaBr or NaI affords the chloride-exchanged products [RuX(CO)(η²C,N-o-C₆H₄N=NC₆H₅)(PPh₃)₂] (2, 3), whereas reaction of 1 with AgOC(O)Me or NaS₂CNEt₂·2H₂O gives the halide mono-phosphine-substituted complexes [Ru(CS)(LL)(η²C,N-o-C₆H₄NNC₆H₅)(PPh₃)] (4, 5). In the solid-state structures of 1 and 3 there are significant changes in the bond lengths for the cyclometallated azobenzene ligand are observed relative to free azobenzene. These are discussed, with the aid of spectroscopic and crystallographic data, in terms of a cis-push–pull effect.     

Spectral, structural and DFT studies of platinum group metal 3,6-bis(2-pyridyl)-4-phenylpyridazine complexes and their ligand bonding modes

Reactions of 3,6-bis(2-pyridyl)-4-phenylpyridazine (L^ph) with [(η⁶-arene)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ (arene = C₆H₆, p-ⁱPrC₆H₄Me and C₆Me₆), [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)M(μ-Cl)Cl]₂, (M = Rh and Ir) and [(η⁵-Cp)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl] (Cp = C₅H₅, C₅Me₅ and C₉H₇) afford mononuclear complexes of the type [(η⁶-arene)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆, [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)M(L^ph)Cl]PF₆ and [(Cp)Ru(L^ph)(PPh₃)]PF₆ with different structural motifs depending on the π-acidity of the ligand, electronic properties of the central metal atom and nature of the co-ligands. Complexes [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆1, [(η⁶-p-ⁱPrC₆H₄Me)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆2, [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ir(L^ph)Cl]PF₆5, [(η⁵-Cp)Ru(PPh₃)(L^ph)]PF₆, (Cp = C₅H₅, 6; C₅Me₅, 7; C₉H₇, 8) show the type-A binding mode (see text), while complexes [(η⁶-C₆Me₆)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆3 and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Rh(L^ph)Cl]PF₆4 show the type-B binding mode (see text). These differences reflect the more electron-rich character of the [(η⁶-C₆Me₆)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Rh(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ complexes compared to the other starting precursor complexes. Binding modes of the ligand L^ph are determined by ¹H NMR spectroscopy, single-crystal X-ray analysis as well as evidence obtained from the solid-state structures and corroborated by density functional theory calculations. From the systems studied here, it is concluded that the electron density on the central metal atom of these complexes plays an important role in deciding the ligand binding sites.     

Metal—azo and metal—imine compounds : IV. Chemical properties of cyclometallated compounds

The reactions of some cyclometallated azo and imino compounds have been studied. Treatment of [IrHX(PhCCHCHNC₃H₇)(PCy₃)₂] with X₂ (X = Cl, Br) yields substitution products [IrHX(PhCCXCHNC₃H₇)(PCy₃)₂] without rupture of the IrC bond. Treatment of [IrHCl(5-CH₃ · C₆H₃CHNCH₃) (PPh₃)₂] with AgClO₄ and then with CNC₆H₁₁ or CO (= L) leads to the formation of the complexes [IrHL(5-CH₃ · C₆H₃CHNCH₃)(PPh₃)₂]ClO₄, the metallocyclic ring remaining intact. Rupture of the metallocyclic ring is observed when [PdCl(C₆H₄NNPh)]₂ is treated under mild conditions with CNC₆H₁₁, and the insertion product [PdCl(CNC₆H₁₁)₂ {(CNC₆H₁₁)₂C₆H₄NNPh} ] is obtained.Possible mechanisms for the reactions are discussed.     

Study of half-sandwich platinum group metal complexes bearing dpt-NH2 ligand

A quite general approach for the preparation of η⁵-and η⁶-cyclichydrocarbon platinum group metal complexes is reported. The dinuclear arene ruthenium complexes [(η⁶-arene)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ (arene = C₆H₆, C₁₀H₁₄ and C₆Me₆) and η⁵-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl rhodium and iridium complexes [(η⁶-C₅Me₅)M(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ (M = Rh, Ir) react with 2 equiv. of 4-amino-3,5-di-pyridyltriazole (dpt-NH₂) in presence of NH₄PF₆ to afford the corresponding mononuclear complexes of the type [(η⁶-arene)Ru(dpt-NH₂)Cl]PF₆ {arene = C₁₀H₁₄ (1), C₆H₆ (2) and C₆Me₆ (3)} and [(η⁶-C₅Me₅)M(dpt-NH₂)Cl]PF₆ {M = Rh (4), Ir (5)}. However, the mononuclear η⁵-cyclopentadienyl analogues such as [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl], [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Os(PPh₃)₂Br], [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl] and [(η⁵-C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl] complexes react in presence of 1 equiv. of dpt-NH₂ and 1 equiv. of NH₄PF₆ in methanol yielded mononuclear complexes [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)(dpt-NH₂)]PF₆ (6), [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Os(PPh₃)(dpt-NH₂)]PF₆ (7), [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)(dpt-NH₂)]PF₆ (8) and [(η⁵-C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)(dpt-NH₂)]PF₆ (9), respectively. These compounds have been totally characterized by IR, NMR and mass spectrometry. The molecular structures of 4 and 6 have been established by single crystal X-ray diffraction and some of the representative complexes have also been studied by UV–Vis spectroscopy.     

Syntheses and structural studies of mononuclear arene ruthenium complexes with nitrogen-based chelating ligands

Dinuclear arene ruthenium complexes [(η⁶-arene)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ (arene?=?C₆H₆; p ⁱPrC₆H₄Me; C₆Me₆) and monomeric cyclopentadienyl complexes [(η⁵-Cp)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl] (Cp?=?cyclopentadienyl) react with polypyridyl nitrogen ligands L¹ (3-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole) and L² (1,3-bis(di-2-pyridylaminomethyl)benzene) in methanol to afford cationic mononuclear compounds [(η⁶-arene)Ru(L¹)Cl]⁺ (arene?=?C₆H₆, 1; p ⁱPrC₆H₄Me, 2; C₆Me₆, 3), [(η⁶arene)Ru(L²)Cl]⁺ (arene?=?C₆H₆, 4; p ⁱPrC₆H₄Me, 5; C₆Me₆, 6), [(η⁵-Cp)Ru(L¹)(PPh₃)]⁺ (7), and [(η⁵Cp)Ru(L²)(PPh₃)]⁺ (8). All cationic mononuclear compounds were isolated as their hexafluorophosphate salts and characterized by elemental analyses, NMR, and IR spectroscopic methods and some representative complexes by UV-Vis spectroscopy. The solid state structures of two derivatives, [6]PF₆ and [7]PF₆, have been determined by the X-ray structure analysis.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity of RuII Complexes with Trimethylsilylethinylamidinate Ligands

The mononuclear amidinate complexes [(η⁶‐cymene)‐RuCl( 1a )] ( 2 ) and [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)RuCl( 1b )] ( 3 ), with the trimethylsilyl‐ethinylamidinate ligands [Me₃SiC≡CC(N‐c‐C₆H₁₁)₂]^– ( 1a^– ) and[Me₃SiC≡CC(N‐i‐C₃H₇)₂]^– ( 1b^– ) were synthesized in high yields by salt metathesis. In addition, the related phosphane complexes[(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )] ( 4a ) [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )] ( 4b ), and [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )](BF₄) ( 5 ‐BF₄) were prepared by ligand exchange reactions. Investigations on the removal of the trimethyl‐silyl group using [Bu₄N]F resulted in the isolation of [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)Ru(PPh₃){(N‐i‐C₃H₇)₂CC≡CH}](BF₄) ( 6 ‐BF₄) bearing a terminal alkynyl hydrogen atom, while 2 and 3 revealed to yield intricate reaction mixtures. Compounds 1a / b to 6 ‐BF₄ were characterized by multinuclear NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P) and IR spectroscopy and elemental analyses, including X‐ray diffraction analysis of 1b , 2 , and 3 .     

Propionyl complexes of ruthenium derived from the reaction of ethylene with RuHCl(CO)2(PPh3)2

RuHCl(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ reacts with ethylene under mild conditions (25 psi, 80°C) to yield a propionyl derivative RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ which is believed to be coordinatively unsaturated. Unlike the acetyl analogue, RuCl[C[O]C₂H₅(CO)-(PPh₃)₂ does not isomerize to RuCl(C₂H₅)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ in solution. Under one atmosphere of carbon monoxide, RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅(CO)(PPh₃)₂ exists in equilibrium with two species believed to be RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ and [Ru(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂]Cl. RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ reacts with CO/ AgClO₄ to give mer-[Ru(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂]ClO₄, p-tolylisocyanide (RNC) and NaClO₄ to give cis-[Ru(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)(CNR)₂(PPh₃)₂ClO₄, and hydrochloric acid to yield the hydroxycarbene complex, RuCl₂(CO)(C[OH]C₂H₅)(PPh₃)₂.     

Palladium(II) complexes of Y,C,Y‐chelated phosphines: synthesis,structure, and catalytic activity in Suzuki–Miyaura reaction

The phosphines L¹PPh₂ (1) and L²PPh₂ (2) containing different Y,C,Y‐chelating ligands, L¹ = 2,6‐(^tBuOCH₂)₂C₆H₃^? and L² = 2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃^?, were treated with PdCl₂ and di‐µ‐chloro‐bis[2‐[(N,N‐dimethylamino)methyl]phenyl‐C,N]‐dipalladium(II) and yielded complexes trans‐{[2,6‐(^tBuOCH₂)₂C₆H₃]PPh₂}₂PdCl₂ (3), {[2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃]PPh₂} PdCl₂ (4), {[2,6‐(^tBuOCH₂)₂C₆H₃]PPh₂}Pd(Cl)[2‐(Me₂NCH₂)C₆H₄] (5) and {[2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃]PPh₂}Pd(Cl)[2‐(Me₂NCH₂)C₆H₄] (6) as the result of different ability of starting phosphines 1 and 2 to complex PdCl₂. Compounds 3–6 were characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR spectroscopy and ESI‐MS. The molecular structures of 3,4 and 6 were also determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis. The catalytic activity of complexes 3–6 was evaluated in the Suzuki‐Miyaura cross‐coupling reaction. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Syntheses,characterization, and crystal structures of ruthenium(II)/(III) complexes with tridentate salicylaldiminato ligands

Treatment of [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] with one equivalent of tridentate Schiff base 2-[(2-dimethylamino-ethylimino)-methyl]-phenol (HL) in the presence of triethylamine afforded a ruthenium(III) complex [RuCl₃(κ²-N,N-NH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂)(PPh₃)] as a result of decomposition of HL. Interaction of HL and one equivalent of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃], [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂] or [Ru(tht)₄Cl₂] (tht = tetrahydrothiophene) under different conditions led to isolation of the corresponding ruthenium(II) complexes [RuCl(κ³-N,N,O-L)(CO)(PPh₃)] (2), [RuCl(κ³-N,N,O-L)(CO)₂] (3), and a ruthenium(III) complex [RuCl₂(κ³-N,N,O-L)(tht)] (4), respectively. Molecular structures of 1·CH₂Cl₂, 2·CH₂Cl₂, 3 and 4 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Acetylene Dithiolate Linking up the [Tp′W(CO)(CN)] Moiety with RuII or PdII

A series of heterodinuclear complexes with acetylene dithiolate (acdt^2?) as the bridging moiety were synthesised by a facile one‐pot procedure that avoided use of the highly elusive acetylene dithiol. Generation of the W–Ru complex [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] (Tp’=hydrotris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)borate) and the W–Pd complexes [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)] and [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)][PF₆] (dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphoshino)ethane), which exhibit a [W(η²‐κ²‐C₂S₂)M] core (M=Ru, Pd), was accomplished by using a transition‐metal‐assisted solvolytical removal of the Me₃Si‐ethyl thiol protecting groups. All intermediate species of the reaction have been fully characterised. The highly coloured W–Ru complex [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] shows reversible redox chemistry, as does the prototype complex [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)][PF₆]. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction and IR, EPR and UV/Vis spectroscopic studies in conjunction with DFT calculations prove the high electronic delocalisation of states over the acdt^2? linker. Comparative studies revealed a higher donor strength and more pronounced dithiolate character of acdt^2? in [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] relative to [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)]⁺. In addition, the influence of the overall complex charge on the metric parameters was investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies with the W–Pd complexes [Tp′WL₂(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)] (L=(CN^?)(CO) or (CO)₂). The central [W(C₂S₂)Pd] units exhibit high structural similarity, which indicates the extensive delocalisation of charge over both metals.     

The first ruthenium(II) complex with benzotriazole and pyridylcarboxylato ligands

The reaction of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] with 1-(2-pyridylcarbonyl)benzotriazole has been examined. A new ruthenium(II) complex–[RuCl(PPh₃)₂(C₆H₅N₃)(C₅H₄NCO₂)] has been obtained and characterized by IR and UV–Vis measurements. The crystal structure of the complex has been determined. The electronic spectrum of the complex has been calculated by TDDFT method.     

[(η-C6H6)Ru(L)(Cl/N3/CN/CH3CN)] complexes of non-planar pyrazolylmethylpyridine ligands: Formation of helices due to C-H?X (X = Cl, N) interaction

Structural analysis of a previously reported half-sandwich complex having three-legged “piano-stool” geometry [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru^II(L¹)Cl][PF₆] (1) (L¹ = 2-(pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)pyridine) is described. Treatment of 1 with (i) Ag(CF₃SO₃) in CH₃CN and (ii) NaN₃ in CH₃OH, and (iii) the reaction between [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L²)Cl]-[PF₆] (2) (previously reported) and NaCN in C₂H₅OH led to the isolation of [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L¹)(CH₃CN)][PF₆]₂ (3), [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L¹)(N₃)][PF₆] (4), and [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L²)(CN)][PF₆] (5), respectively (L² = 2-(3,5-dimethyl-pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)pyridine). The complex [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L⁴)Cl][PF₆] (6) with a new ligand (L⁴ = 2-[3-(4-fluorophenyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]pyridine) has also been synthesized. The structures of 3-6 have been elucidated (¹H NMR spectra; CD₃CN). The molecular structures of 1, 4, and 6·C₆H₅CH₃ have been determined. Notably, the crystal-packing in these structures is governed by C-H?X (X = Cl, N) interactions, generating helical architectures.     

Synthesis and cytostatic activity of Pt(II) complexes of intramolecularly coordinated phosphine and stibine ligands

The intramolecularly coordinated phosphine and stibine ligands L¹PPh₂ ( 1 ), L²PPh₂ ( 2 ) and L²SbPh₂ ( 3 ) containing Y,C,Y‐chelating ligands, L¹ = 2,6‐(^tBuOCH₂)₂C₆H₄^? and L² = 2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₄^?, were prepared and characterized. The treatment of these ligands 1 , 2 , 3 with PtCl₂ yielded complexes trans‐{[2,6‐(^tBuOCH₂)₂C₆H₃]PPh₂}₂PtCl₂ (4), cis‐{[2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃]PPh₂}PtCl₂ (5), and cis‐{[2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃]SbPh₂}PtCl₂ (6) as the result of different ability of the starting compounds 1 , 2 , 3 to complex platinum centre. Compounds 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 were characterized by ¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and molecular structures of 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis. The substitution reactions of complexes 4 , 5 , 6 were also studied. The reaction of 5 and 6 with NaI yielded complexes {[2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃]PPh₂}PtI₂ ( 7 ) and {[2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃]SbPh₂}PtI₂ ( 8 ), while the same reaction of 4 with NaI did not proceed. As the compounds 7 and 8 structurally resemble cisplatin, complex {{[2‐(Me₂NCH₂)‐6‐(Me₂NHCH₂)C₆H₃]PPh₂}PtCl₂}⁺Cl^? ( 9 ) was prepared as water‐soluble platinum complex. The cytotoxic effect of complex 9 was evaluated on human T‐lymphocytic leukemia cells MOLT‐4 (IC₅₀ = 27.6 ± 1.8 µmol l^?1) and human promyelocytic leukemia HL‐60 (IC₅₀ = 55.9 ± 4.9 µmol l^?1). Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis,Structures, and Reactivities of Pincer‐Type Ruthenium Complexes Bearing Two Proton‐Responsive Pyrazole Arms

A new metal–ligand bifunctional, pincer‐type ruthenium complex [RuCl( L1‐H2 )(PPh₃)₂]Cl ( 1 ; L1‐H2 =2,6‐bis(5‐tert‐butyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine) featuring two proton‐delivering pyrazole arms has been synthesized. Complex 1 , derived from [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] with L1‐H2 , underwent reversible deprotonation with potassium carbonate to afford the pyrazolato–pyrazole complex [RuCl(L1‐H)(PPh₃)₂] ( 2 ). Further deprotonation of 1 and 2 with potassium hexamethyldisilazide in methanol resulted in the formation of the bis(pyrazolato) complex [Ru(L1)(MeOH)(PPh₃)₂] ( 3 ). Complex 3 smoothly reacted with dioxygen and dinitrogen to give the side‐on peroxo complex [Ru(L1)(O₂)(PPh₃)₂] ( 4 ) and end‐on dinitrogen complex [Ru(L1)(N₂)(PPh₃)₂] ( 5 ), respectively. On the other hand, the reaction of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] with less hindered 2,6‐di(1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine ( L3‐H2 ) led to the formation of the dinuclear complex [{RuCl₂(PPh₃)₂}₂(μ₂‐ L3‐H2 )₂] ( 6 ), in which the pyrazole‐based ligand adopted a tautomeric form different from L1‐H2 in 1 and the central pyridine remained uncoordinated. The detailed structures of 1 , 2 , 3 , 3.MeOH , 4 , 5 , 6 were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl ruthenium(II) complexes of para-substituted N-(pyrid-2-ylmethylene)-phenylamine ligands: syntheses,spectral and structural studies

The reaction of [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl] (1) with acetonitrile in the presence of excess NH₄PF₆ leads to the formation of the cationic ruthenium(II) complex [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)]PF₆ (2). The complex (2) reacts with a series of N,N′ donor Schiff base ligands viz. para-substituted N-(pyrid-2-ylmethylene)-phenylamines (ppa) in methanol to yield pentamethylcylopentadienyl ruthenium(II) Schiff base complexes of the formulation [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)(C₅H₄N-2-CHN-C₆H₄-p-X)]PF₆ [3a]PF₆–[3f]PF₆, where C₅Me₅ = pentamethylcylopentadienyl, X = H, [3a]PF₆, Me, [3b]PF₆, OMe, [3c]PF₆, NO₂, [3d]PF₆, Cl, [3e]PF₆, COOH, [3f]PF₆. The complexes were isolated as their hexafluorophosphate salts. The complexes were fully characterized on the basis of elemental analyses and NMR spectroscopy. The molecular structure of a representative complex, [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)(C₅H₄N-2-CHN-C₆H₄-p-Cl)]PF₆ [3e]PF₆, has been established by X-ray crystallography.     

Synthesis,Reactivity and Crystal Structures of the Palladium(II) Complexes with the Pyrimidine Containing Ligand: Crystal Structures of [Pd(PPh3)(η1‐C4H3N2)(η2‐S2CNC4H8)] and [Pd(PPh3)(η1‐C4H3N2)(η2‐Tp)]

Treatment of Pd(PPh₃)₄ with 5‐bromo‐pyrimidine [C₄H₃N₂Br] in dichloromethane at ambient temperature cause the oxidative addition reaction to produce the palladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(Br)], 1 , by substituting two triphenylphosphine ligands. In acetonitrile solution of 1 in refluxing temperature for 1 day, it do not undergo displacement of the triphenylphosphine ligand to form the dipalladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)Br]₂{μ,η²‐(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)}₂, or bromide ligand to form chelating pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂(η²‐C₄H₃N₂)]Br. Complex 1 reacted with bidentate ligand, NH₄S₂CNC₄H₈, and tridentate ligand, KTp {Tp = tris(pyrazoyl‐1‐yl)borate}, to obtain the η²‐dithiocarbamate η¹‐pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(η²‐S₂CNC₄H₈)], 4 and η²‐Tp η¹‐pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(η²‐Tp)], 5 , respectively. Complexes 4 and 5 are characterized by X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

15N NMR spectroscopy as a probe for the geometry of diazenido ligands

A useful criterion of linear or bent geometry at N_α of diazenido (-N_αN_βR) ligands is afforded by ¹⁵N NMR. A very large downfield shift (ca. 350 ppm) of the N_α resonance is reported for the “doubly-bent” diazenido ligands in [RhCl₂(¹⁵NNC₆H₄R-4)(PPh₃)₂] (R = H or NO₂) compared with the “singly-bent” diazenido ligands in trans-[MX(¹⁵N₂R¹)(dppe)₂] (M = Mo or W, X = Cl or Br, R¹ = Et or COMe), [ReCl₂(¹⁵N₂COC₆H₅)(C₅H₅N)(PPh₃)₂] and [RuCl₃(¹⁵NNC₆H₅)(PPh₃)₂].