The conformations of two copper(I) complexes of 1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione and thiosaccharinate

(Acetonitrile‐1κN)[μ‐1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐1:2κ²S:S][1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐2κS]bis(μ‐1,1‐dioxo‐1λ⁶,2‐benzothiazole‐3‐thiolato)‐1:2κ²S³:N;1:2κ²S³:S³‐dicopper(I)(Cu—Cu), [Cu₂(C₇H₄NO₂S₂)₂(C₇H₆N₂S)₂(CH₃CN)] or [Cu₂(tsac)₂(Sbim)₂(CH₃CN)] [tsac is thiosaccharinate and Sbim is 1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione], (I), is a new copper(I) compound that consists of a triply bridged dinuclear Cu—Cu unit. In the complex molecule, two tsac anions and one neutral Sbim ligand bind the metals. One anion bridges via the endocyclic N and exocyclic S atoms (μ‐S:N). The other anion and one of the mercaptobenzimidazole molecules bridge the metals through their exocyclic S atoms (μ‐S:S). The second Sbim ligand coordinates in a monodentate fashion (κS) to one Cu atom, while an acetonitrile molecule coordinates to the other Cu atom. The Cu^I—Cu^I distance [2.6286 (6) Å] can be considered a strong `cuprophilic' interaction. In the case of [μ‐1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐1:2κ²S:S]bis[1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione]‐1κS;2κS‐bis(μ‐1,1‐dioxo‐1λ⁶,2‐benzothiazole‐3‐thiolato)‐1:2κ²S³:N;1:2κ²S³:S³‐dicopper(I)(Cu—Cu), [Cu₂(C₇H₄NO₂S₂)₂(C₇H₆N₂S)₃] or [Cu₂(tsac)₂(Sbim)₃], (II), the acetonitrile molecule is substituted by an additional Sbim ligand, which binds one Cu atom via the exocylic S atom. In this case, the Cu^I—Cu^I distance is 2.6068 (11) Å.     

The first square‐planar copper(II) 1:2 complex with differently coordinated 2‐hydroxybenzaldehyde 4‐allylthiosemicarbazone ligands

The title compound, [(Z)‐4‐allyl‐2‐(2‐hydroxybenzylidene)thiosemicarbazide‐κS][(E)‐4‐allyl‐1‐(2‐oxidobenzylidene)thiosemicarbazidato‐κ³O,N¹,S]copper(II) monohydrate, [Cu(C₁₁H₁₁N₃OS)(C₁₁H₁₃N₃OS)]·H₂O, crystallized as a rotational twin in the monoclinic crystal system (space group Cc) with two formula unit (Z′ = 2) in the asymmetric unit, one of which contains an allyl substituent disordered over two positions. The Cu^II atom exhibits a distorted square‐planar geometry involving two differently coordinated thiosemicarbazone ligands. One ligand is bonded to the Cu^II atom in a tridentate manner via the phenolate O, azomethine N and thioamide S atoms, while the other coordinates in a monodentate manner via the S atom only. The complex is stabilized by an intramolecular hydrogen bond, which creates a six‐membered pseudo‐chelate metalla‐ring. The structure analysis indicates the presence of the E isomer for the tridentate ligand and the Z isomer for the monodentate ligand. The crystal structure contains a three‐dimensional network built from intermolecular O—H...O, N—H...O, O—H...N and N—H...S hydrogen bonds.     

The dinuclear copper(II) complexes di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis{[N,N′‐bis(4‐chlorobenzyl)propane‐1,2‐diamine]chloridocopper(II)} and di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis{[N,N′‐bis(3,4‐methylenedioxybenzyl)propane‐1,2‐diamine]chloridocopper(II)}

The two title dinuclear copper(II) complexes, [Cu₂Cl₄(C₁₇H₂₀Cl₂N₂)₂], (I), and [Cu₂Cl₄(C₁₉H₂₂N₂O₄)₂], (II), have similar coordination environments. In each complex, the asymmetric unit consists of one half‐molecule and the two copper centres are bridged by a pair of Cl atoms, resulting in complexes with centrosymmetric structures containing Cu(μ‐Cl)₂Cu parallelogram cores; the Cu...Cu separations and Cu—Cl—Cu angles are 3.4285 (8) Å and 83.36 (3)°, respectively, for (I), and 3.565 (2) Å and 84.39 (7)° for (II). Each Cu atom is five‐coordinated and the coordination geometry around the Cu atom is best described as a distorted square‐pyramid with a τ value of 0.155 (3) for (I) and 0.092 (7) for (II). The apical Cu—Cl bond length is 2.852 (1) Å for (I) and 2.971 (2) Å for (II). The basal Cu—Cl and Cu—N average bonds lengths are 2.2673 (9) and 2.030 (2) Å, respectively, for (I), and 2.280 (2) and 2.038 (6) Å for (II). The molecules of (I) are linked by one C—H...Cl hydrogen bond into a complex [10] sheet. The molecules of (II) are linked by one C—H...Cl and one N—H...O hydrogen bond into a complex [100] sheet.     

4‐Amino derivatives of 7‐nitro‐2,1,3‐benzoxadiazole: the effect of the amino moiety on the structure of fluorophores

The crystal structures of three 4‐amino derivatives of 7‐nitro‐2,1,3‐benzoxa­diazole with increasing substituent ring size, viz. 7‐nitro‐4‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐2,1,3‐benzoxa­diazole, C₁₀H₁₀N₄O₃, 7‐nitro‐4‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)‐2,1,3‐benzoxa­diazole, C₁₁H₁₂N₄O₃, and 4‐(azepan‐1‐yl)‐7‐nitro‐2,1,3‐benzoxa­diazole, C₁₂H₁₄N₄O₃, have been determined in order to understand their photophysical behaviour. All three were found to crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups. There is considerable electron delocalization compared with the parent compound, although the five‐membered oxa­diazole ring apparently does not participate in this. The length of the C—N bond between the amino N atom and the 7‐nitro­benzoxa­diazole system is found to be shorter than in similar compounds, as is the C—N_nitro bond. In each structure, the nitro group lies in the plane of the benzoxa­diazole unit.     

Einkristalle von CuPrS2 im A— und Pr2S3 im C—Typ bei Versuchen zur Synthese ternärer Kupfer(I)—Praseodym(III)—Sulfide

Single Crystals of A—type CuPrS₂ and C—type Pr₂S₃ from Attempts to Synthesize Ternary Copper(I) Praseodymium(III) Sulfides Coarse, yellowish‐green single crystals of the ternary copper(I) praseodymium(III) sulfide CuPrS₂ form within seven days at 800°C by oxidation of elemental copper and praseodymium with sulfur (molar ratio: 1:1:2) in evacuated silica tubes when equimolar quantitites of CsCl are present as flux. Attempts to synthesize CuPr₃S₅ or CuPr₅S₈ under analogous conditions always yield two‐component mixtures of CuPrS₂ and Pr₂S₃ (C type) instead of the desired target compounds. The crystal structure of CuPrS₂ (monoclinic, P2₁/c; a = 655.72(6), b = 722.49(6), c = 686.81(6)pm, β = 98.686(7)°; Z = 4) exhibits undulated layers {[Cu(S1)_3/3(S2)_1/1]^3—} parallel (100) which consist of vertex‐linked pairs of two [CuS₄]^7— tetrahedra ([Cu₂S₆]^10—) sharing a common edge. Their three‐dimensional cross‐linkage is achieved by Pr³⁺ cations in monocapped trigonal prismatic coordination of seven S^2— anions each. The metal sulfur distances in the [CuS₄] units cover with 233 (Cu—S2) and 236 (Cu—S1) as well as 247 (Cu—S1′) and 248pm (Cu—S1″) a rather broad interval, whereas those (Pr—S: 284—304 pm) within the [PrS₇] polyhedra lie relatively closer together. According to Pr_2.677□_0.333S₄ (with Z = 4), C—Pr₂S₃ crystallizes in a cation‐deficient Th₃P₄‐type structure (cubic, I4¯3d; a = 857.68(7) pm; Z = 5.333 for Pr₂S₃). In conformity with the Niggli formula {PrS_8/5.333} Pr³⁺ is surrounded trigon‐dodecahedrally by eight S^2— at distances of 287 (4×) and 307pm (4×). Neither the X‐ray single‐crystal structure refinement nor electron‐beam microprobe analyses leave any evidence for the incorporation of Cu⁺ cations into this crystal structure.     

Bis{μ‐6,6′‐dimethoxy‐2,2′‐[propane‐1,2‐diylbis(iminomethylene)]diphenolato}bis[aquacopper(II)] dihydrate

In the title compound, [Cu₂(C₁₉H₂₄N₂O₄)₂(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O, the asymmetric unit consists of one half of the bis{μ‐6,6′‐dimethoxy‐2,2′‐[propane‐1,2‐diylbis(iminomethylene)]diphenolato}bis[aquacopper(II)] complex and two water molecules. Two Cu^II centres are bridged through a pair of phenolate groups, resulting in a complex with a centrosymmetric structure, with the centre of inversion at the middle of the Cu₂O₂ plane. The Cu atoms are in a slightly distorted square‐pyramidal coordination environment (τ = 0.07). The average equatorial Cu—O bond length and the axial Cu—O bond length are 1.928 (3) and 2.486 (3) Å, respectively. The Cu—O(water) bond length is 2.865 (4) Å, so the compound could be described as having a weakly coordinating water molecule at each Cu^II ion and two solvent water molecules per dimetallic unit. The Cu...Cu distance and Cu—O—Cu angle are 3.0901 (10) Å and 87.56 (10)°, respectively. The molecules are linked into a sheet by O—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds parallel to the [001] plane.     

Large‐Scale Synthesis of High‐Quality Metal Sulfide Semiconductor Quantum Dots with Tunable Surface‐Plasmon Resonance Frequencies

High‐quality CdS and Cu₇S₄ quantum dots (QDs) were synthesized with N,N‐dibutylthiourea (DBTU) as an organic sulfur source. In this method, nucleation and growth reactions were controlled simply by the heating rate of the reaction. The mild oxidation conditions gave monodisperse CdS QDs exhibiting pure band‐edge emission with relatively high photoluminescence quantum yield. During the synthesis of Cu₇S₄ QDs, the addition of dodecanethiol to the reaction system controlled the reaction rate to give monodisperse spherical or disk‐shaped QDs. A hundred‐gram scale of copper precursor could be used to generate the high‐quality Cu₇S₄ QDs, indicating that an industrial‐scale reaction is achievable with our method. As observed in anisotropic noble‐metal nanocrystals, larger disk‐shaped Cu₇S₄ QDs showed lower localized‐surface‐plasmon resonance energy in the near‐infrared region. The disk‐shaped Cu₇S₄ QDs could be used effectively as templates to form cation‐exchanged monodisperse disk‐shaped CdS QDs.     

Two isomers of Pd2(S2NC7H4)4

The dichloromethane solvates of the isomers tetrakis(μ‐1,3‐benzothiazole‐2‐thiolato)‐κ⁴N:S;κ⁴S:N‐dipalladium(II)(Pd—Pd), (I), and tetrakis(μ‐1,3‐benzothiazole‐2‐thiolato)‐κ⁶N:S;κ²S:N‐dipalladium(II)(Pd—Pd), (II), both [Pd₂(C₇H₄NS₂)₄]·CH₂Cl₂, have been synthesized in the presence of (o‐isopropylphenyl)diphenylphosphane and (o‐methylphenyl)diphenylphosphane. Both isomers form a lantern‐type structure, where isomer (I) displays a regular and symmetric coordination and isomer (II) an asymmetric and distorted structure. In (I), sitting on an centre of inversion, two 1,3‐benzothiazole‐2‐thiolate units are bonded by a Pd—N bond to one Pd atom and by a Pd—S bond to the other Pd atom, and the other two benzothiazolethiolate units are bonded to the same Pd atoms by, respectively, a Pd—S and a Pd—N bond. In (II), three benzothiazolethiolate units are bonded by a Pd—N bond to one Pd atom and by a Pd—S bond to the other Pd atom, and the fourth benzothiazolethiolate unit is bonded to the same Pd atoms by, respectively, a Pd—S bond and a Pd—N bond.     

The weakly coordinating perchlorate group in bis(N,N′‐dimethylethylenediamine‐κ2N,N′)bis(perchlorato‐κO)copper(II) studied at 100, 250 and 400 K

The crystal structure of the title compound, [Cu(ClO₄)₂(C₄H₁₂N₂)₂], (I), is reported at 100, 250 and 400 K. The Cu^II cation in this complex is coordinated in a distorted octahedral mode characteristic of Jahn–Teller systems. The coordination of the perchlorate ligands via longer, and presumably weaker, axial Cu—O distances varies significantly as a function of temperature. One of the Cu—O distances increases between 100 and 250 K, and one of the Cu—O—Cl angles expands between 250 and 400 K. At all temperatures, the complex forms a two‐dimensional N—H...O hydrogen‐bond network in the (001) plane.     

Hexa‐μ2‐chloro‐μ4‐oxo‐tetrakis[(2‐ethyl­tetrazole‐κN4)copper(II)]

In the title molecular complex, [Cu₄Cl₆O(2‐EtTz)₄], where 2‐EtTz is 2‐ethyl­tetrazole (C₃H₆N₄), the central O atom is located on the symmetry site and is tetrahedrally coordinated to four Cu atoms, with Cu—O distances of 1.8966 (4) Å. A very slight distortion of Cu₄O from a regular tetrahedron is observed [two Cu—O—Cu angles are 108.76 (3)° and four others are 109.828 (13)°]. Each Cu atom is connected to three others via the Cl atoms, forming a slightly distorted Cl octahedron around the O atom, with O⋯Cl distances of 2.9265 (7) Å for Cl atoms lying on the twofold axis and 2.9441 (13) Å for those in general positions. The Cu atom has a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal environment, with three Cl atoms in the equatorial plane, and with the N atom of the 2‐ethyl­tetrazole ligand and the μ₄‐O atom in axial positions. The Cu atom is displaced out of the equatorial plane by ca 0.91 Å towards the coordinated N atom of the 2‐­ethyl­tetrazole ligand.     

catena‐Poly[[[(oxamide dioxime‐κ2N,N′)copper(II)]‐μ‐l‐tartrato‐κ4O1,O2:O3,O4] tetrahydrate]: a chiral nanochannel framework hosting solvent water molecules

The crystal structure of the title compound, {[Cu(C₄H₄O₆)(C₂H₆N₄O₂)]·4H₂O}_n, contains the central Cu^II cation in a distorted octahedral coordination, symmetrically chelated by the two imine N atoms of a neutral oxamide dioxime (H₂oxado) ligand [Cu—N = 1.9829 (16) Å] and unsymmetrically bis‐chelated by two halves of the l ‐(+)‐tartrate(2−) (tart) ligands, each half being linked to the Cu^II cation via the deprotonated carboxylate group and protonated hydroxy group [Cu—O = 1.9356 (14) and 2.4674 (13) Å, respectively]. The extended asymmetric unit is defined by twofold axes, one passing through the Cu^II cation and the centre of the oxamide dioxime (H₂oxado) ligand and the another two (symmetry related) bisecting the central C—C bonds of the tartrate ions. The structure is chiral, consisting of enantiomeric linear‐chain polymers oriented along [001], with virtual monomeric {Cu(tart_0.5)₂(H₂oxado)} repeat units and with the chains interleaved face‐to‐face into `twin pillars'. Nanochannels exist, running parallel to the c axis and bisecting a and b, which host `double strings' of solvent water molecules. Extensive hydrogen bonding (O—H...O and N—H...O) between the chains and solvent water molecules, together with extended π–σ interactions, consolidate the bulk crystal structure.     

Structural diversity in imidazolidinone organocatalysts: a synchrotron and computational study

(S)‐1‐(Methylaminocarbonyl)‐3‐phenylpropanaminium chloride (S2·HCl), C₁₀H₁₅N₂O⁺·Cl⁻, crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P2₁2₁2₁ with a single formula unit per asymmetric unit. (5R/S)‐5‐Benzyl‐2,2,3‐trimethyl‐4‐oxoimidazolidin‐1‐ium chloride (R3 and S3), C₁₃H₁₉N₂O⁺·Cl⁻, crystallize in the same space group as S2·HCl but contain three symmetry‐independent formula units. (R/S)‐5‐Benzyl‐2,2,3‐trimethyl‐4‐oxoimidazolidin‐1‐ium chloride monohydrate (R4 and S4), C₁₃H₁₉N₂O⁺·Cl⁻·H₂O, crystallize in the space group P2₁ with a single formula unit per asymmetric unit. Calculations at the B3LYP/6–31G(d,p) and B3LYP/6–311G(d,p) levels of the conformational energies of the cation in R3, S3, R4 and S4 indicate that the ideal gas‐phase global energy minimum conformation is not observed in the solid state. Rather, the effects of hydrogen‐bonding and van der Waals interactions in the crystal structure cause the molecules to adopt higher‐energy conformations, which correspond to local minima in the molecular potential energy surface.     

Investigation on the Growth Mechanism of Cu2MoS4 Nanotube,Nanoplate and its use as a Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution in Water

Cu₂MoS₄ is a ternary transition‐metal sulfide that shows great potential in the field of energy conversion and storage, namely catalytic H₂ evolution in water and Li‐, Na‐ or Mg‐ion battery. In this work, we report on a growth mechanism of the single‐crystalline Cu₂MoS₄ nanotube from (NH₄)₂MoS₄ salt and Cu₂O nanoparticle. By probing the nature and morphology of solid products generated in function of reaction conditions we find that the crystalline Cu(NH₄)MoS₄ nanorod is first generated at ambient conditions. The nanorod is then converted into Cu₂MoS₄ nanotube under hydrothermal treatment due to the Kirkendall effect or a selective etching of the Cu₂MoS₄ core. Extending the hydrothermal treatment causes a collapse of nanotube generating Cu₂MoS₄ nanoplate. The catalytic activities of these sulfides are investigated. The Cu₂MoS₄ shows superior catalytic activity to that of Cu(NH₄)MoS₄. Catalytic performance of the former largely depends on its morphology. The nanoplate shows superior catalytic activity to the nanotube, thanks to its higher specific electrochemical surface area.     

Novel Copper(I)‐Thioantimonates(III): Solvothermal Synthesis,Crystal Structures,Thermal Stability and Magnetic Properties of (C2N2H10)0.5Cu2SbS3, (C3N2H12)0.5Cu2SbS3, and (C4N2H14)0.5Cu2SbS3

The novel copper(I)‐thioantimonates(III) (enH₂²⁺)_0.5Cu₂SbS₃ ( I ) (en = ethylendiamine), (1, 3‐DAPH₂²⁺)_0.5Cu₂SbS₃ ( II ) (1, 3‐DAP = 1, 3 diaminopropane) and (1, 4‐DABH₂²⁺)_0.5Cu₂SbS₃ ( III ) (1, 4‐DAB = 1, 4‐diaminobutane) were synthesized under solvothermal conditions reacting Sb₂S₃, CuCl₂·2H₂O, S with the amines. The compounds crystallize in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n. The primary building units are a SbS₃ trigonal pyramid and two distorted CuS₃ units. In the structures the SbS₃ pyramid is connected to six CuS₃ moieties and every S atom has bonds to one Sb atom and to two Cu atoms. Further interconnection leads to the formation of ten‐membered (10 MR) Cu₃Sb₂S₅ and six‐membered (6 MR) Cu₂SbS₃ rings. Every 10 MR is condensed to four 10 MR and four 6 MR to form a single layer within the (010) plane. Two such single layers are connected to a double layer thus forming the final [Cu₂SbS₃]^— layered anion. The [CuSbS₃]^— protonated amines are located between the layers and the interlayer spacing depends on the size and orientation of these amines. Between the Sb atom and one Cu atom a remarkable short distance of about 2.7Å is observed. At elevated temperatures the compounds decompose into CuSbS₂ and Cu₃SbS₄ suggesting a complex redox reaction. Diamagnetic susceptibilities indicate the copper(I) in the metal sulfide frameworks. All three compounds are semiconductors with intermediate band gaps of about 2 eV.     

(1,3‐Dimethylimidazolidine‐2‐selone‐κSe)bis(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ2N,N′)copper(II) bis(perchlorate) and bis(2,2′‐bipyridyl‐κ2N,N′)(imidazolidine‐2‐thione‐κS)copper(II) bis(perchlorate)

In the first title salt, [Cu(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(C₅H₁₀N₂Se)](ClO₄)₂, the Cu^II centre occupies a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal environment defined by four N donors from two 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen) ligands and by the Se donor of a 1,3‐dimethylimidazolidine‐2‐selone ligand, with the equatorial plane defined by the Se and by two N donors from different phen ligands and the axial sites occupied by the two remaining N donors, one from each phen ligand. The Cu—N distances span the range 1.980 (10)–2.114 (11) Å and the Cu—Se distance is 2.491 (3) Å. Intermolecular π–π contacts between imidazolidine rings and the central rings of phen ligands generate chains of cations. In the second salt, [Cu(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂(C₃H₆N₂S)](ClO₄)₂, the Cu^II centre occupies a similar distorted trigonal–bipyramidal environment comprising four N donors from two 2,2′‐bipyridyl (bipy) ligands and an S donor from an imidazolidine‐2‐thione ligand. The equatorial plane is defined by the S donor and two N donors from different bipy ligands. The Cu—N distances span the range 1.984 (6)–2.069 (7) Å and the Cu—S distance is 2.366 (3) Å. Intermolecular π–π contacts between imidazolidine and pyridyl rings form chains of cations. A major difference between the two structures is due to the presence in the second complex of two N—H...O hydrogen bonds linking the imidazolidine N—H hydrogen‐bond donors to perchlorate O‐atom acceptors.     

(2,2′‐Di­amino‐4,4′‐bi‐1,3‐thia­zole‐κ2N3,N3′)(oxy­diacetato‐κ3O,O′,O′′)­copper(II) monohydrate

The title compound, [Cu(C₄H₄O₅)(C₆H₆N₄S₂)]·H₂O, displays a square‐pyramidal coordination geometry. The tridentate oxy­di­acetate dianion chelates the Cu^II atom in the facial mode. The large difference [0.487 (4) Å] between the longest Cu—O distance in the basal plane and that in the apical direction correlates with the small displacement of the Cu^II atom [0.0576 (13) Å] from the basal plane towards the apex of the square pyramid. The intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding network results in a closely overlapped arrangement of the coordination basal plane and the thia­zole ring of a neighboring mol­ecule.     

Synthesis,characterization and crystal structures of the bidentate Schiff base N,N′‐bis(2‐nitrocinnamaldehyde)ethylenediamine and its complex with CuNCS and triphenylphosphane

Reaction of copper(I) thiocyanate and triphenylphosphane with the bidentate Schiff base N,N′‐bis(trans‐2‐nitrocinnamaldehyde)ethylenediamine {Nca₂en, (1); systematic name (1E,1′E,2E,2′E)‐N,N′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis[3‐(2‐nitrophenyl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐imine]}, C₂₀H₁₈N₄O₄, in a 1:1:1 molar ratio in acetonitrile resulted in the formation of the complex {(1E,1′E,2E,2′E)‐N,N′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis[3‐(2‐nitrophenyl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐imine]‐κ²N,N′}(thiocyanato‐κN)(triphenylphosphane‐κP)copper(I)], [Cu(NCS)(C₂₀H₁₈N₄O₄)(C₁₈H₁₅P)] or [Cu(NCS)(Nca₂en)(PPh₃)], (2). The Schiff base and copper(I) complex have been characterized by elemental analyses, IR, electronic and ¹H NMR spectroscopy, and X‐ray crystallography [from synchrotron data for (1)]. The molecule of (1) lies on a crystallographic inversion centre, with a trans conformation for the ethylenediamine unit, and displays significant twists from coplanarity of its nitro group, aromatic ring, conjugated chain and especially ethylenediamine segments. It acts as a bidentate ligand coordinating via the imine N atoms to the Cu^I atom in complex (2), in which the ethylenediamine unit necessarily adopts a somewhat flattened gauche conformation, resulting in a rather bowed shape overall for the ligand. The NCS⁻ ligand is coordinated through its N atom. The geometry around the Cu^I atom is distorted tetrahedral, with a small N—Cu—N bite angle of 81.56 (12)° and an enlarged opposite angle of 117.29 (9)° for SCN—Cu—P. Comparisons are made with the analogous Schiff base having no nitro substituents and with metal complexes of both ligands.     

Sulfonate salts of the therapeutic agent dapsone: 4‐[(4‐aminophenyl)sulfonyl]anilinium benzenesulfonate monohydrate and 4‐[(4‐aminophenyl)sulfonyl]anilinium methanesulfonate monohydrate

Dapsone, formerly used to treat leprosy, now has wider therapeutic applications. As is the case for many therapeutic agents, low aqueous solubility and high toxicity are the main problems associated with its use. Derivatization of its amino groups has been widely explored but shows no significant therapeutic improvements. Cocrystals have been prepared to understand not only its structural properties, but also its solubility and dissolution rate. Few salts of dapsone have been described. The title salts, C₁₂H₁₃N₂O₂S⁺·C₆H₅O₃S⁻·H₂O and C₁₂H₁₃N₂O₂S⁺·CH₃SO₃⁻·H₂O, crystallize as hydrates and both compounds exhibit the same space group (monoclinic, P2₁/n). The asymmetric unit of each salt consists of a 4‐[(4‐aminophenyl)sulfonyl]anilinium monocation, the corresponding sulfonate anion and a water molecule. The cation, anion and water molecule form hydrogen‐bonded networks through N—H…O=S, N—H…O_water and O_water—H…O=S hydrogen bonds. For both salts, the water molecules interact with one sulfonate anion and two anilinium cations. The benzenesulfonate salt forms a two‐dimensional network, while the hydrogen bonding within the methanesulfonate salt results in a three‐dimensional network.     

An Oxalate‐Bridged Copper(II) Dimer and a Mononuclear ­Cobalt(III) Azide Complex Containing N‐Nitrile‐Functionalized 1, 4, 7‐Triazacyclononane Terminals: Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Magnetic Characterization

The stable dinuclear [Cu(μ‐C₂O₄)Cu]²⁺ entity is facially coordinated at each end by a N‐nitrile functionalized triazamacrocycle, 1, 4, 7‐tris(cyanomethyl)‐1, 4, 7‐triazacyclononane ( L ), to generate a centrosymmetric compound [Cu₂ L ₂(μ‐C₂O₄)](ClO₄)₂ · 4DMF ( 1 ) containing a bis‐bidentate oxalate bridge. The variable‐temperature magnetic measurement for the crystallographically characterized compound exhibits quite strong antiferromagnetic coupling interaction between two oxalate‐linked Cu^II atoms separated by 5.149 Å with a singlet‐triplet energy gap of –345.5 cm^–1. On the other hand, a mononuclear Co^III compound [Co L (N₃)₃] · 2.5H₂O ( 2 ) with monodentate azide terminal groups was synthesized. Structural elucidation by X‐ray diffraction shows that the compound has crystallographically imposed C₃ symmetry. Enantiomerically pure crystals were obtained upon crystallization indicated by a Flack parameter of 0.04(5).