On the regulator–insurer interaction in a structural model

In this paper, we provide a new insight to the previous work of Briys and de Varenne [E. Briys, F. de Varenne, Life insurance in a contingent claim framework: Pricing and regulatory implications, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 19 (1) (1994) 53–72], Grosen and Jørgensen [A. Grosen, P.L. Jørgensen, Life insurance liabilities at market value: An analysis of insolvency risk, bonus policy, and regulatory intervention rules in a barrier option framework, Journal of Risk and Insurance 69 (1) (2002) 63–91] and Chen and Suchanecki [A. Chen, M. Suchanecki, Default risk, bankruptcy procedures and the market value of life insurance liabilities, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 40 (2007) 231–255]. We show that the particular risk management strategy followed by the insurance company can significantly change the risk exposure of the company, and that it should thus be taken into account by regulators. We first study how the regulator establishes regulation intervention levels in order to control for instance the default probability of the insurance company. This part of the analysis is based on a constant volatility. Given that the insurance company is informed of regulatory rules, we study how results can be significantly different when the insurance company follows a risk management strategy with non-constant volatilities. We thus highlight some limits of the prior literature and believe that the risk management strategy of the company should be taken into account in the estimation of the risk exposure as well as in that of the market value of liabilities.     

Optimal Exercise Strategies for Operational Risk Insurance via Multiple Stopping Times

In this paper we demonstrate how to develop analytic closed form solutions to optimal multiple stopping time problems arising in the setting in which the value function acts on a compound process that is modified by the actions taken at the stopping times. This class of problem is particularly relevant in insurance and risk management settings and we demonstrate this on an important application domain based on insurance strategies in Operational Risk management for financial institutions. In this area of risk management the most prevalent class of loss process models is the Loss Distribution Approach (LDA) framework which involves modelling annual losses via a compound process. Given an LDA model framework, we consider Operational Risk insurance products that mitigate the risk for such loss processes and may reduce capital requirements. In particular, we consider insurance products that grant the policy holder the right to insure k of its annual Operational losses in a horizon of T years. We consider two insurance product structures and two general model settings, the first are families of relevant LDA loss models that we can obtain closed form optimal stopping rules for under each generic insurance mitigation structure and then secondly classes of LDA models for which we can develop closed form approximations of the optimal stopping rules. In particular, for losses following a compound Poisson process with jump size given by an Inverse-Gaussian distribution and two generic types of insurance mitigation, we are able to derive analytic expressions for the loss process modified by the insurance application, as well as closed form solutions for the optimal multiple stopping rules in discrete time (annually). When the combination of insurance mitigation and jump size distribution does not lead to tractable stopping rules we develop a principled class of closed form approximations to the optimal decision rule. These approximations are developed based on a class of orthogonal Askey polynomial series basis expansion representations of the annual loss compound process distribution and functions of this annual loss.     

商业医疗保险损失分析:基于广义线性模型的实证研究

本文使用广义线性模型对商业医疗保险损失进行建模,并用某商业保险公司的医疗保险赔付数据进行了实证检验,结果表明,在影响医疗保险损失的诸多因素中,住院天数、医院级别、地区、保障档次等都是显著的因素,而性别和小于60岁以下年龄段内年龄则并不是显著因素,这些结论给医疗保险的经营和风险控制带来实际的意义.     

Application of the phase‐type mortality law to life contingencies and risk management

The class of phase‐type distributions has recently gained much popularity in insurance applications due to its mathematical tractability and denseness in the class of distributions defined on positive real line. In this paper, we show how to use the phase‐type mortality law as an efficient risk management tool for various life insurance applications. In particular, pure premiums, benefit reserves, and risk‐loaded premiums using CTE for standard life insurance products are shown to be available in analytic forms, leading to efficient computation and straightforward implementation. A way to explicitly determine provisions for adverse deviation for interest rate and mortality is also proposed. Furthermore, we show how the interest rate risk embedded in life insurance portfolios can be analyzed via interest rate sensitivity index and diversification index which are constructed based on the decomposition of portfolio variance. We also consider the applicability of phase‐type mortality law under a few non‐flat term structures of interest rate. Lastly, we explore how other properties of phase‐type distributions may be applied to joint‐life products as well as subgroup risk ordering and pricing within a given pool of insureds. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A participatory multi-criteria approach for power generation and transmission planning

It is well-known that reinsurance can be an effective risk management solution for financial institutions such as the insurance companies. The optimal reinsurance solution depends on a number of factors including the criterion of optimization and the premium principle adopted by the reinsurer. In this paper, we analyze the Value-at-Risk based optimal risk management solution using reinsurance under a class of premium principles that is monotonic and piecewise. The monotonic piecewise premium principles include not only those which preserve stop-loss ordering, but also the piecewise premium principles which are monotonic and constructed by concatenating a series of premium principles. By adopting the monotonic piecewise premium principle, our proposed optimal reinsurance model has a number of advantages. In particular, our model has the flexibility of allowing the reinsurer to use different risk loading factors for a given premium principle or use entirely different premium principles depending on the layers of risk. Our proposed model can also analyze the optimal reinsurance strategy in the context of multiple reinsurers that may use different premium principles (as attributed to the difference in risk attitude and/or imperfect information). Furthermore, by artfully imposing certain constraints on the ceded loss functions, the resulting model can be used to capture the reinsurer’s willingness and/or capacity to accept risk or to control counterparty risk from the perspective of the insurer. Under some technical assumptions, we derive explicitly the optimal form of the reinsurance strategies in all the above cases. In particular, we show that a truncated stop-loss reinsurance treaty or a limited stop-loss reinsurance treaty can be optimal depending on the constraint imposed on the retained and/or ceded loss functions. Some numerical examples are provided to further compare and contrast our proposed models to the existing models.     

Optimal risk and liquidity management with costly refinancing opportunities

In this paper we study risk and liquidity management decisions within an insurance firm. Risk management corresponds to decisions regarding proportional reinsurance, whereas liquidity management has two components: distribution of dividends and costly equity issuance. Contingent on whether proportional or fixed costs of reinvestment are considered, singular stochastic control or stochastic impulse control techniques are used to seek strategies that maximize the firm value. We find that, in a proportional-costs setting, the optimal strategies are always mixed in terms of risk management and refinancing. In contrast, when fixed issuance costs are too high relative to the firm’s profitability, optimal management does not involve refinancing. We provide analytical specifications of the optimal strategies, as well as a qualitative analysis of the interaction between refinancing and risk management.     

Asset management and surplus distribution strategies in life insurance: An examination with respect to risk pricing and risk measurement

In this paper, we investigate the impact of different asset management and surplus distribution strategies in life insurance on risk-neutral pricing and shortfall risk. In general, these feedback mechanisms affect the contract’s payoff and hence directly influence pricing and risk measurement. To isolate the effect of such strategies on shortfall risk, we calibrate contract parameters so that the compared contracts have the same market value and same default-value-to-liability ratio. This way, the fair valuation method is extended since, in addition to the contract’s market value, the default put option value is fixed. We then compare shortfall probability and expected shortfall and show the substantial impact of different management mechanisms acting on the asset and liability side.     

Optimal insurance design in the presence of exclusion clauses

The present work studies the design of an optimal insurance policy from the perspective of an insured, where the insurable loss is mutually exclusive from another loss that is denied in the insurance coverage. To reduce ex post moral hazard, we assume that both the insured and the insurer would pay more for a larger realization of the insurable loss. When the insurance premium principle preserves the convex order, we show that any admissible insurance contract is suboptimal to a two-layer insurance policy under the criterion of minimizing the insured’s total risk exposure quantified by value at risk, tail value at risk or an expectile. The form of optimal insurance can be further simplified to be one-layer by imposing an additional weak condition on the premium principle. Finally, we use Wang’s premium principle and the expected value premium principle to illustrate the applicability of our results, and find that optimal insurance solutions are affected not only by the size of the excluded loss but also by the risk measure chosen to quantify the insured’s risk exposure.     

Multivariate stress scenarios and solvency

We show how the probabilistic concepts of half-space trimming and depth may be used to define convex scenario sets Q_α for stress testing the risk factors that affect the solvency of an insurance company over a prescribed time period. By choosing the scenario in Q_α which minimizes net asset value at the end of the time period, we propose the idea of the least solvent likely event (LSLE) as a solution to the forward stress testing problem. By considering the support function of the convex scenario set Q_α, we establish theoretical properties of the LSLE when financial risk factors can be assumed to have a linear effect on the net assets of an insurer. In particular, we show that the LSLE may be interpreted as a scenario causing a loss equivalent to the Value-at-Risk (VaR) at confidence level α, provided the α-quantile is a subadditive risk measure on linear combinations of the risk factors. In this case, we also show that the LSLE has an interpretation as a per-unit allocation of capital to the underlying risk factors when the overall capital is determined according to the VaR. These insights allow us to define alternative scenario sets that relate in similar ways to coherent measures, such as expected shortfall. We also introduce the most likely ruin event (MLRE) as a solution to the problem of reverse stress testing.     

Optimal insurance with belief heterogeneity and incentive compatibility

People may evaluate risk differently in the insurance market. Motivated by this, we examine an optimal insurance problem allowing the insured and the insurer to have heterogeneous beliefs about loss distribution. To reduce ex post moral hazard, we follow Huberman et al. (1983) to assume that alternative insurance contracts satisfy the principle of indemnity and the incentive-compatible constraint. Under the assumption that the insurance premium is calculated by the expected value principle, we establish a necessary and sufficient condition for an optimal insurance solution and provide a practical scheme to improve any suboptimal insurance strategy under an arbitrary form of belief heterogeneity. By virtue of this condition, we explore qualitative properties of optimal solutions, and derive optimal insurance contracts explicitly for some interesting forms of belief heterogeneity. As a byproduct of this investigation, we find that Theorem 3.6 of Young (1999) is not completely true.     

基于Solidarity值的河流水资源分配

河流水资源分配问题可以抽象为图限制下合作对策解的模型.基于图限制下合作对策的Solidarity值对参与者的收益分配进行分析,构造了Solidarity值的结构,给出了该值的分支有效性等四个性质,并利用这四个性质刻画了Solidarity值的唯一性.最后通过一个简单的实例,证明了河流水资源分配问题中,基于Solidarity值的收益分配比Myerson值更优.     

A modified insurance risk process with uncertainty

An insurance risk process is traditionally considered by describing the claim process via a renewal reward process and assuming the total premium to be proportional to the time with a constant ratio. It is usually modeled as a stochastic process such as the compound Poisson process, and historical data are collected and employed to estimate the corresponding parameters of probability distributions. However, there exists the case of lack of data such as for a new insurance product. An alternative way is to estimate the parameters based on experts’ subjective belief and information. Therefore, it is necessary to employ the uncertain process to model the insurance risk process. In this paper, we propose a modified insurance risk process in which both the claim process and the premium process are assumed to be renewal reward processes with uncertain factors. Then we give the inverse uncertainty distribution of the modified process at each time. On this basis, we derive the ruin index which has an explicit expression based on given uncertainty distributions.     

基于ANP和模糊聚类的军人家属风险研究

军人家属风险是因军人履行职责而承担的连带风险, 是军人风险的重要组成部分。军人家属风险管理状况关系到军队的稳定性。由于军人家属风险属性上具备一定的模糊性, 当前缺乏规范的理论指导和实践管理经验。文章尝试通过构建ANP模型, 首先分析影响军人风险的因子指标及权重, 再以此为依据, 针对军人家属风险采用模糊聚类法与典型的人身风险、财产风险和责任风险进行聚类, 以期寻求最适宜的类别划分, 将典型风险的成熟管理模式和经验借鉴到军人家属风险领域, 并提出相应的管理建议。研究发现, 意外伤害风险、住房保障风险等13项指标是军人家属风险的主要影响因素; 军人家属风险在阈值0.95的水平上与责任风险聚为同一类型; 构建以军人家属风险为对象, 以军人家属社保和住房为重点内容, 军队保险、商业保险和军人互助保险三位一体的责任保险体系, 是完善军人家属风险管理的关键所在。     

Valuation and risk assessment of participating life insurance in the presence of credit risk

In participating life insurance, management decisions regarding the asset composition can substantially impact the value of a policy from the policyholders’ perspective as well as the insurer’s risk situation. Due to the long-term guarantees often embedded in these contracts, life insurers typically invest a considerable portion of their capital in long-term assets such as corporate and government bonds. Besides interest rate risk, the value of these bond investments is thus particularly influenced by credit risk. Thus, the aim of this paper is to examine the impact of market risk associated with the asset composition on fair valuation and risk assessment with focus on credit risk and its interaction with equity risk and interest rate risk. Our analysis emphasizes that the consideration of credit risk associated with bonds has a strong impact on the fair valuation and risk measurement in the context of participating life insurance contracts, even in case of higher grade bond exposures.     

An application of comonotonicity theory in a stochastic life annuity framework

A life annuity contract is an insurance instrument which pays pre-scheduled living benefits conditional on the survival of the annuitant. In order to manage the risk borne by annuity providers, one needs to take into account all sources of uncertainty that affect the value of future obligations under the contract. In this paper, we define the concept of annuity rate as the conditional expected present value random variable of future payments of the annuity, given the future dynamics of its risk factors. The annuity rate deals with the non-diversifiable systematic risk contained in the life annuity contract, and it involves mortality risk as well as investment risk. While it is plausible to assume that there is no correlation between the two risks, each affects the annuity rate through a combination of dependent random variables. In order to understand the probabilistic profile of the annuity rate, we apply comonotonicity theory to approximate its quantile function. We also derive accurate upper and lower bounds for prediction intervals for annuity rates. We use the Lee-Carter model for mortality risk and the Vasicek model for the term structure of interest rates with an annually renewable fixed-income investment policy. Different investment strategies can be handled using this framework.     

Statistics and game theory: Estimating coalitional values in R software

In this paper we illustrate the usage of R software in cooperative game theory. In particular, we address the problems that arise in exactly calculating the coalitional values for general TU-games in which a large amount of players is involved. In these settings, their approximation may be useful in practice. We analyse these sampling methods from a statistical point of view, from a theoretical and an empirical approach.     

Efficient risk allocation within a non-life insurance group under Solvency II Regime

Intra-group transfers are risk management tools that are usually widely used to optimise the risk position of an insurance group. In this paper, it is shown that premium and liability transfers could be optimally made in such a way as to reduce the amount of Technical Provisions and Minimum Capital Requirement for the entire insurance conglomerate. These levels of required capital represent the minimal amount that needs to be held by the insurance group without regulator intervention, according to the Solvency II regulation. We assume that only proportional risk transfers are feasible, since such transfers are not difficult to administer for a large scaled insurance group, as is always the case. In addition, any risk shifting should be made for commercial purposes in order to be considered acceptable by the local regulators that impose restrictions on how much the assets within an insurance group are fungible. Our numerical examples illustrate the efficiency of the optimal proportional risk transfers which can easily be implemented, in terms of computation, in any well-known solver even for an insurance conglomerate with many subsidiaries. We found that our proposed optimal proportional allocations are more beneficial for large insurance group, since the relative reduction in capital requirement tends to be small, whereas the gain in absolute terms is quite significant for large scaled insurance group.     

Production under uncertainty with insurance or hedging

This paper examines the output decision of a risk-averse producer facing profit risk in the presence of insurance or hedging. Conditions under which the producer’s output increases upon the introduction of generic insurance are derived, giving rise to conditions for deductible insurance (commodity call options), coinsurance-type insurance (commodity futures), and restricted deductible insurance, respectively. This paper improves upon the literature by considering general profit risk, possibly revenue risk or cost risk, that may not be multiplicative. Moreover, unlike Machnes and Wong’s [Geneva Pap. Risk Insurance Theory 28 (2003) 73–80] condition on the loading factor that may not lead to an explicit and unique value, the condition derived in this paper gives rise to a unique upper bound for the loading factor. Finally, their assumptions on the utility function, such as quadratic utility and constant absolute risk aversion for the case of restrictive deductible insurance and zero-loading are made substantial less restrictive.     

投保人异质性风险偏好下指数保险市场均衡的动态演化分析

兼具道德风险与逆向选择免疫性和即刻赔付双重优势的指数保险逐渐成为巨灾风险管理的重要工具,但目前多处于试点阶段,市场均衡演化规律仍不明确。本文构建了指数保险市场中保险公司、投保人和政府的三方演化博弈模型,同时,考虑投保人面对损失与收益的不同风险态度,引入异质性风险偏好设计了投保人决策函数,进而分析指数保险市场均衡演化路径及其影响因素。结果表明,指数保险市场均衡随其生命周期的演进而变化,政府在指数保险市场中的职能将从管理者走向退出;政府对保险公司进行补贴更有效,但补贴力度需在适度范围内。影响因素方面,投保人的异质性风险偏好对市场均衡演化有重要影响,其损失敏感性将加快市场向均衡状态的收敛速度;提前赔付优势能够促进市场向均衡状态收敛,但溢出效应会延缓均衡的达成。基于此提出了政府对指数保险市场引导与鼓励的建议。     

A methodology for integrated critical spare parts and insurance management

Critical spare‐parts stock optimization has become a relevant topic for academy and industry. In most articles, the problem has been stated as a trade‐off between economic risks of shortages and financial costs. Risk optimization in this context has been mainly studied from a logistics point of view. The most common decision variables have been stock levels, stock location, and reorder points. In this context, buying insurance to cover shortage cost can be a complementary (or exclusive) measure for risk mitigation. Insurance optimization traditionally has been studied from a microeconomic and financial perspective. The main decision variable has been the indemnity function, and occasionally, the insurance premium. Its use in the context of physical asset management has not been observed to the best of our knowledge. This creates an opportunity to link inventory optimization techniques with insurance optimization for shortage losses. In this work, we present a novel approach to jointly manage the shortage risk of a critical non‐repairable component in a unique critical system. We develop an original model to integrate critical spare‐parts stock optimization with insurance optimization techniques. The result is a decision model to select the optimal stock and insurance policy that maximizes the decision maker's expected utility. This allows for a business‐centered integrated perspective in critical parts decisions. We present a case study representative of the mining industry, illustrating the complementary nature of selecting optimal stock levels and contracting an optimal insurance. Our results show that contracting an insurance can lead to policies preferred by a risk‐averse decision maker. The case study shows that this may even occur lowering stock levels and increasing profits. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.