The nature of halogen...halogen synthons: crystallographic and theoretical studies

A study of the halogen...halogen contacts in organic compounds using ab initio calculations and the results of previously reported crystallographic studies show that these interactions are controlled by electrostatics. These contacts can be represented by the geometric parameters of the C--X1...X2--C moieties (where theta1=C--X1...X2 and theta2=X1...X2--C; ri=X1...X2 distance). The distributions of the contacts within the sum of van der Waals radii (rvdW) versus thetai (theta1=theta2) show a maximum at theta approximately 150 degrees for X=Cl, Br, and I. This maximum is not seen in the distribution of F...F contacts. These results are in good agreement with our ab initio calculations. The theoretical results show that the position of the maximum depends on three factors: 1) The type of halogen atom, 2) the hybridization of the ipso carbon atom, and 3) the nature of the other atoms that are bonded to the ipso carbon atom apart from the halogen atom. Calculations show that the strength of these contacts decreases in the following order: I...I>Br...Br>Cl...Cl. Their relative strengths decrease as a function of the hybridization of the ipso carbon atom in the following order: sp2>sp>sp3. Attaching an electronegative atom to the carbon atom strengthens the halogen...halogen contacts. An electrostatic model is proposed based on two assumptions: 1) The presence of a positive electrostatic end cap on the halogen atom (except for fluorine) and 2) the electronic charge is anisotropically distributed around the halogen atom.     

Zn(II) Heteroleptic Halide Complexes with 2-Halopyridines: Features of Halogen Bonding in Solid State

Reactions between Zn(II) dihalides and 2-halogen-substituted pyridines 2-XPy result in a series of heteroleptic molecular complexes [(2-XPy)₂ZnY₂] (Y = Cl, X = Cl (1), Br (2), I (3); Y = Br, X = Cl (4), Br (5), I (6), Y = I, X = Cl (7), Br (8), and I (9)). Moreover, 1–7 are isostructural (triclinic), while 8 and 9 are monoclinic. In all cases, halogen bonding plays an important role in formation of crystal packing. Moreover, 1–9 demonstrate luminescence in asolid state; for the best emitting complexes, quantum yield (QY) exceeds 21%.     

Rational Modification of the Hierarchy of Intermolecular Interactions in Molecular Crystal Structures by Using Tunable Halogen Bonds

A family of 16 isomolecular salts (3‐XpyH)₂[MX′₄] (3‐XpyH=3‐halopyridinium; M=Co, Zn; X=(F), Cl, Br, (I); X′=Cl, Br, I) each containing rigid organic cations and tetrahedral halometallate anions has been prepared and characterized by X‐ray single crystal and/or powder diffraction. Their crystal structures reflect the competition and cooperation between non‐covalent interactions: N? H???X′? M hydrogen bonds, C? X???X′? M halogen bonds and π–π stacking. The latter are essentially unchanged in strength across the series, but both halogen bonds and hydrogen bonds are modified in strength upon changing the halogens involved. Changing the organic halogen (X) from F to I strengthens the C? X???X′? M halogen bonds, whereas an analogous change of the inorganic halogen (X′) weakens both halogen bonds and N? H???X′? M hydrogen bonds. By so tuning the strength of the putative halogen bonds from repulsive to weak to moderately strong attractive interactions, the hierarchy of the interactions has been modified rationally leading to systematic changes in crystal packing. Three classes of crystal structure are obtained. In type A (C? F???X′? M) halogen bonds are absent. The structure is directed by N? H???X′? M hydrogen bonds and π‐stacking interactions. In type B structures, involving small organic halogens (X) and large inorganic halogens (X′), long (weak) C? X???X′? M interactions are observed with type I halogen–halogen interaction geometries (C? X???X′ ≈ X???X′? M ≈155°), but hydrogen bonds still dominate. Thus, minor but quite significant perturbations from the type A structure arise. In type C, involving larger organic halogens (X) and smaller inorganic halogens (X′), stronger halogen bonds are formed with a type II halogen–halogen interaction geometry (C? X???X′ ≈180°; X???X′? M ≈110°) that is electrostatically attractive. The halogen bonds play a major role alongside hydrogen bonds in directing the type C structures, which as a result are quite different from type A and B.     

Halogens in competition: electronic structure of mixed dihalobenzenes

The electronic structure of all isomeric dihalobenzenes C6H4XY (X, Y = Cl, Br, I) has been investigated by HeI/HeII photoelectron spectroscopy, Green's functions calculations, and comparison with the spectra of related dihalobenzenes C6H4X2 (X = Cl, Br, I). The careful analysis of measured pi orbital and halogen lone pair ionization energies enabled us to describe substituent effects in terms of resonance, inductive, steric, and spin-orbit coupling interactions.     

Experimental and theoretical studies on the nature of weak nonbonded interactions between divalent selenium and halogen atoms

To investigate the nature of weak nonbonded selenium...halogen interactions (Se...X interactions; X = F, Cl, and Br), three types of model compounds [2-(CH(2)X)C(6)H(4)SeY (1-3), 3-(CH(2)X)-2-C(10)H(6)SeY (4-6), and 2-XC(6)H(4)CH(2)SeY (7-9); Y = CN, Cl, Br, SeAr, and Me] were synthesized, and their (77)Se NMR spectroscopic behaviors were analyzed in CDCl(3). The gradual upfield shifts of (77)Se NMR absorptions observed for series 1-3 and 4-6 suggested that the strength of Se...X interaction decreases in the order of Se...F > Se...Cl > Se...Br. The quantum chemical calculations at the B3LYP/631H level using the polarizable continuum model (PCM) revealed that the most stable conformer for 1-3 is the one with an intramolecular short Se...X atomic contact in CHCl(3) (epsilon = 4.9) and also that the n(X) --> sigma(Se-Y) orbital interaction (E(Se...X)) can reasonably explain the order of strength for the Se...X interactions. On the other hand, the (77)Se NMR absorptions observed for series 7-9 did not shift significantly from the reference compounds (C(6)H(5)CH(2)SeY), indicating the absence of the Se...X interaction for 7-9 presumably due to attenuation of basicity for the halogen atom that is substituted directly to the aromatic ring. These observations suggested that the n(X) --> sigma(Se-Y) orbital interaction is a dominant factor for formation of weak Se...X interactions. Electron correlation was also suggested to be important for the stability.     

Competition between hydrogen and halogen bonding in halogenated 1‐methyluracil: Water systems

The competition between hydrogen‐ and halogen‐bonding interactions in complexes of 5‐halogenated 1‐methyluracil (XmU; X = F, Cl, Br, I, or At) with one or two water molecules in the binding region between C5‐X and C4?O4 is investigated with M06‐2X/6‐31+G(d). In the singly‐hydrated systems, the water molecule forms a hydrogen bond with C4?O4 for all halogens, whereas structures with a halogen bond between the water oxygen and C5‐X exist only for X = Br, I, and At. Structures with two waters forming a bridge between C4?O and C5‐X (through hydrogen‐ and halogen‐bonding interactions) exist for all halogens except F. The absence of a halogen‐bonded structure in singly‐hydrated ClmU is therefore attributed to the competing hydrogen‐bonding interaction with C4?O4. The halogen‐bond angle in the doubly‐hydrated structures (150–160°) is far from the expected linearity of halogen bonds, indicating that significantly non‐linear halogen bonds may exist in complex environments with competing interactions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Synthesis of carbaalane halogen derivatives

The carbaalane halogen derivatives [(AlX)(6)(AlNMe(3))(2)(CCH(2)CH(2)SiMe(3))(6)] (X = F (9), Cl (7), Br (10), I (11)) were prepared in toluene from [(AlH)(6)(AlNMe(3))(2)(CCH(2)CH(2)SiMe(3))(6)] (6) and BF(3).OEt(2), BX(3) (X = Br, I), Me(3)SnF, and Me(3)SiX (X = Cl, Br, I), respectively. A partially halogenated product [(AlH)(2)(AlX)(4)(AlNMe(3))(2)(CCH(2)CH(2)SiMe(3))(6)] (12) (X = Cl (approximately 40%), Br (approximately 60%)) was obtained from 5 and impure BBr(3). [(AlH)(6)(AlNMe(3))(2)(CCH(2)Ph)(6)] (5) was converted to [(AlX)(6)(AlNMe(3))(2)(CCH(2)Ph)(6)] (X = F (13), Cl (14), Br (15), I (16)) using BF(3).OEt(2) and Me(3)SiX (X = Cl, Br, I), respectively. The X-ray single-crystal structures of 11.C(6)H(6), 12.3C(7)H(8), 13.6C(7)H(8), and 15.4C(7)H(8) were determined. Compounds 7 and 9-11 are soluble in benzene/toluene and could be well characterized by NMR spectroscopy and MS (EI) spectrometry. The results demonstrate the facile substitution of the hydridic hydrogen atoms in 5 and 6 by the halides with different reagents.     

Interactions of a Mn atom with halogen atoms and stability of its half-filled 3d-shell

Using density functional theory with hybrid exchange-correlation potential, we have calculated the geometrical and electronic structure, relative stability, and electron affinities of MnX(n) compounds (n = 1-6) formed by a Mn atom and halogen atoms X = F, Cl, and Br. Our objective is to examine the extent to which the Mn-X interactions are similar and to elucidate if/how the half-filled 3d-shell of a Mn atom participates in chemical bonding as the number of halogen atoms increases. While the highest oxidation number of the Mn atom in fluorides is considered to be +4, the maximum number of halogen atoms that can be chemically attached in the MnX(n)(-) anions is 6 for X = F, 5 for X = Cl, and 4 for X = Br. The MnCl(n) and MnBr(n) neutrals are superhalogens for n ≥ 3, while the superhalogen behavior of MnF(n) begins with n = 4. These results are explained to be due to the way different halogen atoms interact with the 3d electrons of Mn atom.     

Crystal structures of four δ‐keto esters and a Cambridge Structural Database analysis of cyano–halogen interactions

The revived interest in halogen bonding as a tool in pharmaceutical cocrystals and drug design has indicated that cyano–halogen interactions could play an important role. The crystal structures of four closely related δ‐keto esters, which differ only in the substitution at a single C atom (by H, OMe, Cl and Br), are compared, namely ethyl 2‐cyano‐5‐oxo‐5‐phenyl‐3‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)pent‐2‐enoate, C₁₉H₂₂N₂O₃, (1), ethyl 2‐cyano‐5‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐5‐oxo‐3‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)pent‐2‐enoate, C₂₀H₂₄N₂O₄, (2), ethyl 5‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐2‐cyano‐5‐oxo‐3‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)pent‐2‐enoate, C₁₉H₂₁ClN₂O₃, (3), and the previously published ethyl 5‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐2‐cyano‐5‐oxo‐3‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)pent‐2‐enoate, C₁₉H₂₁BrN₂O₃, (4) [Maurya, Vasudev & Gupta (2013). RSC Adv. 3 , 12955–12962]. The molecular conformations are very similar, while there are differences in the molecular assemblies. Intermolecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds are found to be the primary interactions in the crystal packing and are present in all four structures. The halogenated derivatives have additional aromatic–aromatic interactions and cyano–halogen interactions, further stabilizing the molecular packing. A database analysis of cyano–halogen interactions using the Cambridge Structural Database [CSD; Groom & Allen (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 , 662–671] revealed that about 13% of the organic molecular crystals containing both cyano and halogen groups have cyano–halogen interactions in their packing. Three geometric parameters for the C—X...N[triple‐bond]C interaction (X = F, Cl, Br or I), viz. the N...X distance and the C—X...N and C—N...X angles, were analysed. The results indicate that all the short cyano–halogen contacts in the CSD can be classified as halogen bonds, which are directional noncovalent interactions.     

Supramolecular chemistry of halogens: complementary features of inorganic (M-X) and organic (C-X') halogens applied to M-X...X'-C halogen bond formation

Electronic differences between inorganic (M-X) and organic (C-X) halogens in conjunction with the anisotropic charge distribution associated with terminal halogens have been exploited in supramolecular synthesis based upon intermolecular M-X...X'-C halogen bonds. The synthesis and crystal structures of a family of compounds trans-[MCl(2)(NC(5)H(4)X-3)(2)] (M = Pd(II), Pt(II); X = F, Cl, Br, I; NC(5)H(4)X-3 = 3-halopyridine) are reported. With the exception of the fluoropyridine compounds, network structures propagated by M-Cl...X-C halogen bonds are adopted and involve all M-Cl and all C-X groups. M-Cl...X-C interactions show Cl...X separations shorter than van der Waals values, shorter distances being observed for heavier halogens (X). Geometries with near linear Cl...X-C angles (155-172 degrees ) and markedly bent M-Cl...X angles (92-137 degrees ) are consistently observed. DFT calculations on the model dimers {trans-[MCl(2)(NH(3))(NC(5)H(4)X-3)]}(2) show association through M-Cl...X-C (X not equal F) interactions with geometries similar to experimental values. DFT calculations of the electrostatic potential distributions for the compounds trans-[PdCl(2)(NC(5)H(4)X-3)(2)] (X = F, Cl, Br, I) demonstrate the effectiveness of the strategy to activate C-X groups toward halogen bond formation by enhancing their electrophilicity, and explain the absence of M-Cl...F-C interactions. The M-Cl...X-C halogen bonds described here can be viewed unambiguously as nucleophile-electrophile interactions that involve an attractive electrostatic contribution. This contrasts with some types of halogen-halogen interactions previously described and suggests that M-Cl...X-C halogen bonds could provide a valuable new synthon for supramolecular chemists.     

Triangular halogen trimers. A DFT study of the structure, cooperativity, and vibrational properties

Triangular halogen trimers (RX)3, where X = Br, I and R represents H, H3C, H2FC, HF2C, F3C, CH2=CH, CH[triple bond]C, and Ph, have been investigated using the density functional theory in the Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof method. We report herein the optimized geometries of the stable structures, their vibrational frequencies, and binding energies with the two- and three-body terms. All trimer structures possess a cyclic array of halogen atoms in the type II approach by virtue of the nonspherical atomic charge distribution around the halogens. The Br...Br interactions in trimers are very weak, whereas the I...I interactions in trimers are relatively stronger. While all bromine trimers and most of iodine trimers are predicted to be noncooperative, three of iodine trimers show weak cooperativity. The analysis of vibration modes reveals that all halogen trimers exhibit no especially remarkable frequency shifts. It is also shown that the electrostatic contribution plays a major role in the halogen...halogen interactions in halogen trimers. In contrast to bromine trimers, the relative contribution of charge-transfer component to the halogen...halogen interactions becomes more important for iodine trimers.     

Four-Center Nodes: Supramolecular Synthons Based on Cyclic Halogen Bonding

The isocyanide trans-[PdBr₂(CNC₆H₄-4-X′)₂] (X′=Br, I) and nitrile trans-[PtX₂(NCC₆H₄-4-X′)₂] (X/X′=Cl/Cl, Cl/Br, Br/Cl, Br/Br) complexes exhibit similar structural motif in the solid state, which is determined by hitherto unreported four-center nodes formed by cyclic halogen bonding. Each node is built up by four Type II C−X′⋅⋅⋅X−M halogen-bonding contacts and include one Type I M−X⋅⋅⋅X−M interaction, thus giving the rhombic-like structure. These nodes serve as supramolecular synthons to form 2D layers or double chains of molecules linked by a halogen bond. Results of DFT calculations indicate that all contacts within the nodes are typical noncovalent interactions with the estimated strengths in the range 0.6–2.9 kcal mol⁻¹.     

Magnitude and origin of the attraction and directionality of the halogen bonds of the complexes of C6F5X and C6H5X (X = I, Br, Cl and F) with pyridine

The geometries and interaction energies of complexes of pyridine with C₆F₅X, C₆H₅X (X=I, Br, Cl, F and H) and R_FI (R_F=CF₃, C₂F₅ and C₃F₇) have been studied by ab initio molecular orbital calculations. The CCSD(T) interaction energies (E_int) for the C₆F₅X–pyridine (X=I, Br, Cl, F and H) complexes at the basis set limit were estimated to be ?5.59, ?4.06, ?2.78, ?0.19 and ?4.37 kcal mol^?1, respectively, whereas the E_int values for the C₆H₅X–pyridine (X=I, Br, Cl and H) complexes were estimated to be ?3.27, ?2.17, ?1.23 and ?1.78 kcal mol^?1, respectively. Electrostatic interactions are the cause of the halogen dependence of the interaction energies and the enhancement of the attraction by the fluorine atoms in C₆F₅X. The values of E_int estimated for the R_FI–pyridine (R_F=CF₃, C₂F₅ and C₃F₇) complexes (?5.14, ?5.38 and ?5.44 kcal mol^?1, respectively) are close to that for the C₆F₅I–pyridine complex. Electrostatic interactions are the major source of the attraction in the strong halogen bond although induction and dispersion interactions also contribute to the attraction. Short‐range (charge‐transfer) interactions do not contribute significantly to the attraction. The magnitude of the directionality of the halogen bond correlates with the magnitude of the attraction. Electrostatic interactions are mainly responsible for the directionality of the halogen bond. The directionality of halogen bonds involving iodine and bromine is high, whereas that of chlorine is low and that of fluorine is negligible. The directionality of the halogen bonds in the C₆F₅I– and C₂F₅I–pyridine complexes is higher than that in the hydrogen bonds in the water dimer and water–formaldehyde complex. The calculations suggest that the C? I and C? Br halogen bonds play an important role in controlling the structures of molecular assemblies, that the C? Cl bonds play a less important role and that C? F bonds have a negligible impact.     

The synthesis and crystal structures of halogenated tolans p-X-C6H4-C[triple bond]C-C6F5 and p-X-C6F4-C[triple bond]C-C6H5(X=F, Cl, Br, I)

A series of halogenated, partially fluorinated tolans of general formula p-X-C6H4-C[triple bond]C-C6F5[X=I (1), Br (2), Cl (3), F (4)] and p-X-C6F4-C[triple bond]C-C6H5[X=I (5), Br (6)] have been prepared via palladium-catalysed Sonogashira cross-coupling, or for X=Cl (7), by nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions. The single-crystal X-ray structures of 1-3 and 5-6 have been determined. The structures reveal that the molecular packing is characterized by either arene-perfluoroarene interactions (3), or halogen-halogen interactions (isomorphous 1 and 2), or neither (isomorphous 5 and 6). The structure of represents the first fully determined crystal structure of a compound that contains a halogen atom other than fluorine, in which arene-perfluoroarene interactions are present.     

苯-卤素(X2, X=F, Cl, Br, I)相互作用本质的对称性匹配微扰理论研究

在MP2水平下对被定义为"电荷转移复合物(CTC)"的苯(C6H6)-卤素分子X2(X＝F, Cl, Br, I)相互作用体系进行了量子化学研究. 在优化所得C6H6-X2(X＝F, Cl, Br, I)复合物的平衡几何结构中, 卤素分子X2接近垂直指向苯环上碳-碳双键的中心. 自然键轨道(NBO)分析结果表明, 苯-卤素体系中电荷转移的数量很少. 对称性匹配微扰理论(Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory, SAPT) 能量分解结果显示, 在4个复合物体系中, 静电作用的贡献相对较小(只占总吸引作用的20%左右), 对于C6H6-F2体系, 色散作用是其主要吸引作用, 对于C6H6-Cl2, C6H6-Br2和C6H6-I2 体系, 诱导作用则是其主要的吸引作用, 从F到I, 色散作用逐渐减弱, 诱导作用逐渐增强, 表明在电子相关水平上将苯-卤素体系称为"电荷转移复合物"的说法并不确切.     

Competition between halogen bond and hydrogen bond in complexes of superalkali Li3S and halogenated acetylene XCCH (X = F,Cl, Br,and I)

Complexes of superalkali Li₃S and XCCH (X = F, Cl, Br, and I) have been studied with theoretical calculations at the MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ level. Three types of structures are found: (A) the X atom combines with the S atom through a halogen bond; (B) the X atom interacts with the π electron of Li₃S by a π halogen bond; (C) the H atom combines with the S atom through a hydrogen bond. For A and B, a heavier halogen atom makes the interaction stronger, while for C, the change of interaction energy is not obvious, showing a small dependence on the nature of the X atom in HCCX. A is more stable than B and their difference in stability decreases as X varies from Cl to I. For the F and Cl complexes, A is weaker than C, however, the former is stronger than the latter in the Br and I complexes. The above three types of interactions have been analyzed by means of electron localization function, electron density difference, and energy decomposition, and the results show that they have similar nature and features with conventional interactions. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

H-coupled electron transfer in alkane C-h activations with halogen electrophiles

The mechanisms for the reactions of isobutane and adamantane with polyhalogen electrophiles (HHal(2)(+), Hal(3)(+), Hal(5)(+), and Hal(7)(+), Hal = Cl, Br, or I) were studied computationally at the MP2 and B3LYP levels of theory with the 6-31G (C, H, Cl, Br) and 3-21G (I) basis sets, as well as experimentally for adamantane halogenations in Br(2), Br(2)/HBr, and I(+)Cl(-)/CCl(4). The transition structures for the activation step display almost linear C...H...Hal interactions and are characterized by significant charge transfer to the electrophile; the hydrocarbon moieties resemble the respective radical cation structures. The regiospecificities for polar halogenations of the 3-degree C-H bonds of adamantane, the high experimental kinetic isotope effects (k(H)/k(D) = 3-4), the rate accelerations in the presence of Lewis and proton (HBr) acids, and the high kinetic orders for halogen (7.5 for Br(2)) can only be understood in terms of an H-coupled electron-transfer mechanism. The three centered-two electron (3c-2e) electrophilic mechanistic concept based on the attack of the electrophile on a C-H bond does not apply; electrophilic 3c-2e interactions dominate the C-H activations only with nonoxidizing electrophiles such as carbocations. This was shown by a comparative computational analysis of the electrophilic and H-coupled electron-transfer activation mechanisms for the isobutane reaction with an ambident electrophile, the allyl cation, at the above levels of theory.     

Aromatization of triafulvene and its exocyclic Si,Ge, and Sn derivations by complexation with halogen atoms

The geometries of triafulvene (TF) and its exocyclic Si, Ge, and Sn analogues complexes with F, Cl, Br, and I halogen atoms (TF(X)···Y, X═C, Si, Ge, and Sn; Y═F, Cl, Br, and I) were studied. The complexes were optimized at DFT(B3LYP)/6–311+G(d,p) level of theory. To assess the aromaticity of the considered complexes the geometry-based (HOMA), magnetism-based (NICS), and recently introduced electronic-based (electric field gradient (EFG(0); Shannon aromaticity (SA)) aromaticity indices were employed. The increasing tendency of aromaticity in each complex species was noted as the series of TF(X)···F > TF(X)···Cl > TF(X)···Br > TF((X)···I. Then, the binding energies corrected by basis set super position error (BSSE) were calculated by single point energy calculations at M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p) level. Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis confirmed that the charge transfer takes place from TF(X) to the halogen atoms. Some topological parameters, within the framework of the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM), were also calculated to estimate the aromaticity of the complexes. It was seen that there are some important correlations between the topological parameters and aromaticity indices. In addition the most striking finding was that all the TF(X) molecules are connected with the halogen atoms through Y···C1═C2 (π) noncovalent interaction. This interaction was also investigated through noncovalent interaction (NCI) analysis.     

A comparison of experimental and DFT calculations of ¹⁹⁵Pt NMR shielding trends for [PtX(n)Y(6-n)](2-) (X, Y = Cl, Br, F and I) anions

A comparison between experimental and calculated gas-phase as well as the conductor-like screening model DFT (195)Pt chemical shifts of a series of octahedral [PtX(6-n)Y(n)](2-) complexes for X = Cl, Br, F, I was carried out to assess the accuracy of computed NMR shielding and to gain insight into the dominant σ(dia), σ(para) and σ(SO) shielding contributions. The discrepancies between the experimental and the DFT-calculated (195)Pt chemical shifts vary for these complexes as a function of the coordinated halide ions, the largest being obtained for the fluorido-chlorido and fluorido-bromido complexes, while negligible discrepancies are found for the [PtCl(6-n)Br(n)](2-) series; the discrepancies are somewhat larger where a significant deviation from the ideal octahedral symmetry such as for the geometric cis/trans or fac/mer isomers of [PtF(6-n)Cl(n)](2-) and [PtF(6-n)Br(n)](2-) may be expected. The discrepancies generally increase in the order [PtCl(6-n)Br(n)](2-) < [PtBr(6-n)I(n)](2-) < [PtCl(6-n)I(n)](2-) < [PtF(6-n)Br(n)](2-) ≈ [PtF(6-n)Cl(n)](2-), and show a striking correlation with the increase in electronegativity difference Δχ between the two halide ligands (X(-) and Y(-)) bound to Pt(IV) for these anions: 0.09 < 0.52 < 0.63 < 1.36 ≈ 1.27, respectively. The computed (195)Pt sensitivity to Pt-X bond displacement, ?(δ(195)Pt)/?(ΔPt-X), of these complexes is very large and depends on the halide ion, decreasing from 24 800, 18 300, 15 700 to 12 000 ppm/? for [PtF(6)](2-), [PtCl(6)](2-), [PtBr(6)](2-) and [PtI(6)](2-), respectively.     

Two different modes of halogen bonding in two 4‐nitroimidazole derivatives

In the crystal structures of the two imidazole derivatives 5‐chloro‐1,2‐dimethyl‐4‐nitro‐1H‐imidazole, C₅H₆ClN₃O₂, (I), and 2‐chloro‐1‐methyl‐4‐nitro‐1H‐imidazole, C₄H₄ClN₃O₂, (II), C—Cl...O halogen bonds are the principal specific interactions responsible for the crystal packing. Two different halogen‐bond modes are observed: in (I), there is one very short and directional C—Cl...O contact [Cl...O = 2.899 (1) Å], while in (II), the C—Cl group approaches two different O atoms from two different molecules, and the contacts are longer [3.285 (2) and 3.498 (2) Å] and less directional. In (I), relatively short C—H...O hydrogen bonds provide the secondary interactions for building the crystal structure; in (II), the C—H...O contacts are longer but there is a relatively short π–π contact between molecules related by a centre of symmetry. The molecule of (I) is almost planar, the plane of the nitro group making a dihedral angle of 6.97 (7)° with the mean plane of the imidazole ring. The molecule of (II) has crystallographically imposed mirror symmetry and the nitro group lies in the mirror plane.