Experimental and Computational Studies on Uranium Diazomethanediide Complexes

Uranium diazomethanediide complexes can be prepared and their synthesis, structure and reactivity were explored. Reaction of the uranium imido compound [η⁵-1,2,4-(Me₃Si)₃C₅H₂]₂U=N(p-tolyl)(dmap) ( 1 ) or [η⁵-1,3-(Me₃C)₂C₅H₃]₂U=N(p-tolyl)(dmap) ( 4 ) with Me₃SiCHN₂ cleanly yields the first isocyanoimido metal complexes [η⁵-1,2,4-(Me₃Si)₃C₅H₂]₂U(=NNC)(μ-CNN=)U(dmap)[η⁵-1,2,4-(Me₃Si)₃C₅H₂]₂ ( 2 ) and {[η⁵-1,3-(Me₃C)₂C₅H₃]₂U[μ-(=NNC)]}₆ ( 5 ), respectively. Both compounds exhibit remarkable thermal stability and were fully characterized. According to density functional theory (DFT) studies the bonding between the Cp₂U²⁺ and [NNC]²⁻ moieties is strongly polarized with a significant 5 f orbital contribution, which is also reflected in the reactivity of these complexes. For example, complex 5 acts as a nucleophile toward alkylsilyl halides and engages in a [2+2] cycloaddition with CS₂, but no reaction occurs in the presence of internal alkynes.     

Lewis Base Behavior of Bridging Nitrido Ligands of Titanium Polynuclear Complexes

The Lewis base behavior of μ₃‐nitrido ligands of the polynuclear titanium complexes [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(μ‐NH)}₃(μ₃‐N)] ( 1 ) and [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₄] ( 2 ) to MX Lewis acids has been observed for the first time. Complex 1 entraps one equivalent of copper(I ) halide or copper(I ) trifluoromethanesulfonate through the basal NH imido groups to give cube‐type adducts [XCu{(μ₃‐NH)₃Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}] (X=Cl ( 3 ), Br ( 4 ), I ( 5 ), OSO₂CF₃ ( 6 )). However, the treatment of 1 with an excess (≥2 equiv) of copper reagents afforded complexes [XCu{(μ₃‐NH)₃Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₄‐N)(CuX)}] (X=Cl ( 7 ), Br ( 8 ), I ( 9 ), OSO₂CF₃ ( 10 )) by incorporation of an additional CuX fragment at the μ₃‐N nitrido apical group. Similarly, the tetranuclear cube‐type nitrido derivative 2 is capable of incorporating one, two, or up to three CuX units at the μ₃‐N ligands to give complexes [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)_4?n{(μ₄‐N)CuX}_n] (X=Br ( 11 ), n=1; X=Cl ( 12 ), n=2; X=OSO₂CF₃ ( 13 ), n=3). Compound 2 also reacts with silver(I ) trifluoromethanesulfonate (≥1 equiv) to give the adduct [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₃{(μ₄‐N)AgOSO₂CF₃}] ( 14 ). X‐ray crystal structure determinations have been performed for complexes 8 – 13 . Density functional theory calculations have been carried out to understand the nature and strength of the interactions of [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(μ‐NH)}₃(μ₃‐N)] ( 1′ ) and [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₄] ( 2′ ) model complexes with copper and silver MX fragments. Although coordination through the three basal NH imido groups is thermodynamically preferred in the case of 1′ , in both complexes the μ₃‐nitrido groups act as two‐electron donor Lewis bases to the appropriate Lewis acids.     

Uranium versus Thorium: Synthesis and Reactivity of [η5-1,2,4-(Me3C)3C5H2]2U[η2-C2Ph2]

The synthesis, electronic structure, and reactivity of a uranium metallacyclopropene were comprehensively studied. Addition of diphenylacetylene (PhC≡CPh) to the uranium phosphinidene metallocene [η⁵-1,2,4-(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂]₂U=P-2,4,6-tBu₃C₆H₂ ( 1 ) yields the stable uranium metallacyclopropene, [η⁵-1,2,4-(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂]₂U[η²-C₂Ph₂] ( 2 ). Based on density functional theory (DFT) results the 5f orbital contributions to the bonding within the metallacyclopropene U-(η²-C=C) moiety increases significantly compared to the related Th^IV compound [η⁵-1,2,4-(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂]₂Th[η²-C₂Ph₂], which also results in more covalent bonds between the [η⁵-1,2,4-(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂]₂U²⁺ and [η²-C₂Ph₂]²⁻ fragments. Although the thorium and uranium complexes are structurally closely related, different reaction patterns are therefore observed. For example, 2 reacts as a masked synthon for the low-valent uranium(II) metallocene [η⁵-1,2,4-(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂]₂U^II when reacted with Ph₂E₂ (E=S, Se), alkynes and a variety of hetero-unsaturated molecules such as imines, ketazine, bipy, nitriles, organic azides, and azo derivatives. In contrast, five-membered metallaheterocycles are accessible when 2 is treated with isothiocyanate, aldehydes, and ketones.     

Ligand‐Controlled Formation of a Low‐Valent Pincer Rhodium(I)–Dioxygen Adduct Bearing a Very Short O?O Bond

Treatment of [{Me₂C₆H(CH₂P^tBu₂)₂}Rh(η¹‐N₂)] ( 1a ) with molecular oxygen (O₂) resulted in almost quantitative formation of the dioxygen adduct [{Me₂C₆H(CH₂P^tBu₂)₂}Rh(η²‐O₂)] ( 2a ). An X‐ray diffraction study of 2a revealed the shortest O? O bond reported for Rh? O₂ complexes, indicating the formation of a Rh^I? O₂ adduct, rather than a cyclic Rh^III η²‐peroxo complex. The coordination of the O₂ ligand in 2a was shown to be reversible. Treatment of 2a with CO gas yielded almost quantitatively the corresponding carbonyl complex [{Me₂C₆H(CH₂P^tBu₂)₂}Rh(CO)] ( 3a ). Surprisingly, treatment of the structurally very similar pincer complex [{C₆H₃(CH₂PⁱPr₂)₂)}Rh(η¹‐N₂)] ( 1b ) with O₂ led to partial decomposition, with no dioxygen adduct being observed.     

Molecular Nitrides with Titanium and Group 13–15 Elements

Several heterometallic nitrido complexes were prepared by reaction of the imido–nitrido titanium complex [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(μ‐NH)}₃(μ₃‐N)] ( 1 ) with amido derivatives of Group 13–15 elements. Treatment of 1 with bis(trimethylsilyl)amido [M{N(SiMe₃)₂}₃] derivatives of aluminum, gallium, or indium in toluene at 150–190 °C affords the single‐cube amidoaluminum complex [{(Me₃Si)₂N}Al{(μ₃‐N)₂(μ₃‐NH)Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}] ( 2 ) or the corner‐shared double‐cube compounds [M(μ₃‐N)₃(μ₃‐NH)₃{Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}₂] [M=Ga ( 3 ), In ( 4 )]. Complexes 3 and 4 were also obtained by treatment of 1 with the trialkyl derivatives [M(CH₂SiMe₃)₃] (M=Ga, In) at high temperatures. The analogous reaction of 1 with [{Ga(NMe₂)₃}₂] at 110 °C leads to [{Ga(μ₃‐N)₂(μ₃‐NH)Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}₂] ( 5 ), in which two [GaTi₃N₄] cube‐type moieties are linked through a gallium–gallium bond. Complex 1 reacts with one equivalent of germanium, tin, or lead bis(trimethylsilyl)amido derivatives [M{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] in toluene at room temperature to give cube‐type complexes [M{(μ₃‐N)₂(μ₃‐NH)Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}] [M=Ge ( 6 ), Sn ( 7 ), Pb ( 8 )]. Monitoring the reaction of 1 with [Sn{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] and [Sn(C₅H₅)₂] by NMR spectroscopy allows the identification of intermediates [RSn{(μ₃‐N)(μ₃‐NH)₂Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}] [R=N(SiMe₃)₂ ( 9 ), C₅H₅ ( 10 )] in the formation of 7 . Addition of one equivalent of the metalloligand 1 to a solution of lead derivative 8 or the treatment of 1 with a half equivalent of [Pb{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] afford the corner‐shared double‐cube compound [Pb(μ₃‐N)₂(μ₃‐NH)₄{Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}₂] ( 11 ). Analogous antimony and bismuth derivatives [M(μ₃‐N)₃(μ₃‐NH)₃{Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}₂] [M=Sb ( 12 ), Bi ( 13 )] were obtained through the reaction of 1 with the tris(dimethylamido) reagents [M(NMe₂)₃]. Treatment of 1 with [AlCl₂{N(SiMe₃)₂}(OEt₂)] affords the precipitation of the singular aluminum–titanium square‐pyramidal aggregate [{{(Me₃Si)₂N}Cl₃Al₂}(μ₃‐N)(μ₃‐NH)₂{Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ‐Cl)(μ₃‐N)}] ( 14 ). The X‐ray crystal structures of 5 , 11 , 13 , 14 , and [AlCl{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] were determined.     

Stabilization of a Silaaldehyde by its η2 Coordination to Tungsten

Treatment of pyridine‐stabilized silylene complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄R)(CO)₂(H)W?SiH(py)(Tsi)] (R=Me, Et; py=pyridine; Tsi=C(SiMe₃)₃) with an N‐heterocyclic carbene ^MeIⁱPr (1,3‐diisopropyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) caused deprotonation to afford anionic silylene complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄R)(CO)₂W?SiH(Tsi)][H^MeIⁱPr] (R=Me ( 1‐Me ); R=Et ( 1‐Et )). Subsequent oxidation of 1‐Me and 1‐Et with pyridine‐N‐oxide (1 equiv) gave anionic η²‐silaaldehydetungsten complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄R)(CO)₂W{η²‐O?SiH(Tsi)}][H^MeIⁱPr] (R=Me ( 2‐Me ); R=Et ( 2‐Et )). The formation of an unprecedented W‐Si‐O three‐membered ring was confirmed by X‐ray crystal structure analysis.     

Rare‐Earth‐Metal Alkylaluminates Supported by N‐Donor‐Functionalized Cyclopentadienyl Ligands: C?H Bond Activation and Performance in Isoprene Polymerization

Homoleptic tetramethylaluminate complexes [Ln(AlMe₄)₃] (Ln=La, Nd, Y) reacted with HCp^NMe2 (Cp^NMe2=1‐[2‐(N,N‐dimethylamino)‐ethyl]‐2,3,4,5‐tetramethyl‐cyclopentadienyl) in pentane at ?35 °C to yield half‐sandwich rare‐earth‐metal complexes, [{C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂NMe₂(AlMe₃)}Ln(AlMe₄)₂]. Removal of the N‐donor‐coordinated trimethylaluminum group through donor displacement by using an equimolar amount of Et₂O at ambient temperature only generated the methylene‐bridged complexes [{C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂NMe(μ‐CH₂)AlMe₃}Ln(AlMe₄)] with the larger rare‐earth‐metal ions lanthanum and neodymium. X‐ray diffraction analysis revealed the formation of isostructural complexes and the C? H bond activation of one aminomethyl group. The formation of Ln(μ‐CH₂)Al moieties was further corroborated by ¹³C and ¹H‐¹³C HSQC NMR spectroscopy. In the case of the largest metal center, lanthanum, this C? H bond activation could be suppressed at ?35 °C, thereby leading to the isolation of [(Cp^NMe2)La(AlMe₄)₂], which contains an intramolecularly coordinated amino group. The protonolysis reaction of [Ln(AlMe₄)₃] (Ln=La, Nd) with the anilinyl‐substituted cyclopentadiene HCp^AMe2 (Cp^AMe2=1‐[1‐(N,N‐dimethylanilinyl)]‐2,3,4,5‐tetramethylcyclopentadienyl) at ?35 °C generated the half‐sandwich complexes [(Cp^AMe2)Ln(AlMe₄)₂]. Heating these complexes at 75 °C resulted in the C? H bond activation of one of the anilinium methyl groups and the formation of [{C₅Me₄C₆H₄NMe(μ‐CH₂)AlMe₃}Ln(AlMe₄)] through the elimination of methane. In contrast, the smaller yttrium metal center already gave the aminomethyl‐activated complex at ?35 °C, which is isostructural to those of lanthanum and neodymium. The performance of complexes [{C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂NMe(μ‐CH₂)AlMe₃}‐ Ln(AlMe₄)], [(Cp^AMe2)Ln(AlMe₄)₂], and [{C₅Me₄C₆H₄NMe(μ‐CH₂)AlMe₃}Ln(AlMe₄)] in the polymerization of isoprene was investigated upon activation with [Ph₃C][B(C₆F₅)₄], [PhNMe₂H][B(C₆F₅)₄], and B(C₆F₅)₃. The highest stereoselectivities were observed with the lanthanum‐based pre‐catalysts, thereby producing polyisoprene with trans‐1,4 contents of up to 95.6 %. Narrow molecular‐weight distributions (M_w/M_n<1.1) and complete consumption of the monomer suggested a living‐polymerization mechanism.     

1,2-Diphosphaferrocene als Liganden in Übergangsmetallkomplexen. Röntgenstrukturanalyse von [(η5-1,3-tBu2C5H3){η5-1,2-[Co2(CO)6]-3,4-(Me3SiO)2-5-(Me3Si)P2C3}]

1,2-Diphosphaferrocenes as Ligands in Transition Metal Complexes. X-Ray Structure Analysis of [(η⁵-1,3-tBu₂C₅H₃){η⁵-1,2-[Co₂(CO)₆]-3,4-(Me₃SiO)₂-5-(Me₃Si)P₂C₃}] Reaction of metallo-1,2-diphosphapropene (η⁵-tBuC₅H₄)(CO)₂Fe? P(SiMe₃)? P?C(SiMe₃)₂ with (Z-cyclooctene)Cr(CO)₅ afforded the pentacarbonylchromium adduct of a 1,2-diphosphaferrocene [(η⁵-tBuC₅C₅H₄){η⁵-1-[Cr(CO)₅]-3,4-(Me₃SiO)₂-5-(Me₃Si)P₂C₃}Fe] ( 1 c ). Diphosphaferrocene [(η⁵-tBuC₅H₄){η⁵-3,4-(Me₃SiO)₂-5-(Me₃Si)P₂C₃}Fe] ( 2 c ) was formed when (η⁵-tBuC₅H₄)(CO)₂FeBr was treated with (Me₃Si)₂P? P?C(SiMe₃)₂ in toluene at 60°C. Photolysis of molybdenum- and tungsten hexacarbonyl in the presence of [(η⁵-1,3-tBu₂C₅H₃){η⁵-3,4-(Me₃SiO)₂-5-(Me₃Si)P₂C₃}Fe] ( 2 b ) gave the pentacarbonylmetal adducts 8 (M = Mo) and 9 (M = W), respectively. A corresponding manganese derivative resulted from the photochemical reaction of 2 b and (MeC₅H₄)Mn(CO)₃. Treatment of 2 b with Co₂(CO)₈ yielded trinuclear [(η⁵-1,3-tBu₂C₅H₃){η⁵-1,2-[Co₂(CO)₆]-3,4-(Me₃SiO)₂-5-(Me₃Si)P₂C₃}Fe] ( 11 ). Constitution and configuration of compounds 1 c, 2 c, 8 – 11 were determined by elemental analyses and spectra (IR, ¹H-, ¹³C-, ³¹P-NMR, MS). In addition the molecular structure of 11 was established by single crystal X-ray analysis.     

Synthesis of new phosphorus ylides: Spectroscopic and X‐ray structural studies

Stable phosphoranes, Ar₃P = CHCOR (R = C₆H₅, C₆H₄NO₂, C₆H₄OCH₃, CH₃, OCH₂C₆H₅; Ar = p‐tolyl or phenyl), have been C‐acylated by acetic anhydride to obtain new types of phosphorus ylides. Synthesis and characterization of six phosphorus ylides of the type Ar₃PC(COCH₃)(COR) are reported. The reaction of {(p‐tolyl)₃PCHCOC₆H₅} ( I ), {(p‐ tolyl)₃PCHCOC₆H₄NO₂} ( II ), {Ph₃PCHCOC₆H₄NO₂} ( III ), {Ph₃PCHCOC₆H₄OCH₃} ( IV ), {(p‐tolyl)₃PCHCOCH₃} ( V ), and {Ph₃PCHCOOCH₂C₆H₅} ( VI ) with acetic anhydride in dry chloroform as solvent gives (p‐tolyl)₃PC(COMe)(COC₆H₅), α‐acetyl‐α‐benzoylmethy‐lenetriphenylphosphorane ( 1 ), {(p‐tolyl)₃PC(COMe) (COC₆H₄NO₂)} ( 2 ), {Ph₃PC(COMe)(COC₆H₄NO₂)} ( 3 ), {Ph₃PC(COMe)(COC₆H₄OCH₃)} ( 4 ), {(p‐tolyl)₃ PC(COCH₃)₂} ( 5 ), and {Ph₃PC(COMe)(COOCH₂ C₆H₅)} ( 6 ). Single crystal X‐ray analyses for ylides 2 , 5 , and 6 reveal the monoclinic ( 2, 5 ) and triclinic ( 6 ) crystal systems. Characterization of the obtained compounds was also performed by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H, ³¹P, and ¹³C NMR. The geometries of these compounds have been investigated using density functional theory (DFT). In addition, electronic parameters of these compounds such as HOMO and LUMO energy, Mulliken partial charge, and dipole moment were obtained. In this paper, the reactivity of these ylides is discussed in regard to the aforementioned data. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 21:475–485, 2010; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com . DOI 10.1002/hc.20633     

An unusual organoyttrium alkyl complex containing a [C5HMe3(η(3)-CH2)-C5H4N-κ]- ligand and an elusive cyclopentadienide-based scandium tuck-over zwitterion obtained by C-H bond activation

The acid–base reaction between Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂ and the pyridyl‐functionalized cyclopentadienyl (Cp) ligand C₅Me₄H? C₅H₄N (1 equiv) at 0 °C afforded a mixture of two products: (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(thf) ( 1 a ) and (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)₂YCH₂SiMe₃ ( 1 b ), in a 5:2 ratio. Addition of the same ligand (2 equiv) to Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂, however, generated 1 b together with the novel complex 1 c , the first well defined yttrium mono(alkyl) complex (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)[C₅HMe₃(η³‐CH₂)‐C₅H₄N‐κ]Y(CH₂SiMe₃) containing a rare κ/η³‐allylic coordination mode in which the C? H bond activation occurs unexpectedly with the allylic methyl group rather than conventionally on Cp ring. If the central metal was changed to lutetium, the equimolar reaction between Lu(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂ and C₅Me₄H? C₅H₄N exclusively afforded the bis(alkyl) product (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)Lu(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(thf) ( 2 a ). Similarly, the reaction between the ligand (2 equiv) and Lu(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂ gave the mono(alkyl) complex (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)₂LuCH₂SiMe₃ ( 2 b ), in which no ligand redistribution was observed. Strikingly, treatment of Sc(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂ with C₅Me₄H? C₅H₄N in either 1:1 or 1:2 ratio at 0 °C generated the first cyclopentadienide‐based scandium zwitterionic “tuck‐over” complex 3 , (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)Sc(thf)[μ‐η⁵:η¹:κ‐C₅Me₃(CH₂)‐C₅H₄N]Sc(CH₂SiMe₃)₃. In the zwitterion, the dianionic ligand [C₅Me₃(CH₂)‐C₅H₄N]^2? binds both to Sc1³⁺ and to Sc2³⁺, in η⁵ and η¹/κ modes. In addition, the reaction chemistry, the molecular structures, and the mechanism are also discussed in detail.     

Unusual Nitrile–Nitrile and Nitrile–Alkyne Coupling of FcCN and FcCCCN

The reactions of the Group 4 metallocene alkyne complexes, [Cp*₂M(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃)] ( 1 a : M=Ti, 1 b : M=Zr, Cp*=η⁵‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl), with the ferrocenyl nitriles, Fc?C?N and Fc?C?C?C?N (Fc=Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(η⁵‐C₅H₄)), is described. In case of Fc?C?N an unusual nitrile–nitrile C?C homocoupling was observed and 1‐metalla‐2,5‐diaza‐cyclopenta‐2,4‐dienes ( 3 a , b ) were obtained. As the first step of the reaction with 1 b , the nitrile was coordinated to give [Cp*₂Zr(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃)(N?C‐Fc)] ( 2 b ). The reactions with the 3‐ferrocenyl‐2‐propyne‐nitrile Fc?C?C?C?N lead to an alkyne–nitrile C?C coupling of two substrates and the formation of 1‐metalla‐2‐aza‐cyclopenta‐2,4‐dienes ( 4 a , b ). For M=Zr, the compound is stabilized by dimerization as evidenced by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis. The electrochemical behavior of 3 a , b and 4 a , b was investigated, showing decomposition after oxidation, leading to different redox‐active products.     

Mononuclear Complexes of Platinum Group Metals Containing η6‐ and η5‐Cyclic Π‐Perimeter Hydrocarbon and Pyridylpyrazolyl Derivatives: Syntheses and Structural Studies

Piano‐stool‐shaped platinum group metal compounds, stable in the solid state and in solution, which are based on 2‐(5‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine ( L ) with the formulas [(η⁶‐arene)Ru( L )Cl]PF₆ {arene = C₆H₆ ( 1 ), p‐cymene ( 2 ), and C₆Me₆, ( 3 )}, [(η⁶‐C₅Me₅)M( L )Cl]PF₆ {M = Rh ( 4 ), Ir ( 5 )}, and [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 6 ), [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Os(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 7 ), [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 8 ), and [(η⁵‐C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 9 ) were prepared by a general method and characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The molecular structures of compounds 4 and 5 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In each compound the metal is connected to N1 and N11 in a k² manner.     

Synthesis and Insertion Chemistry of Mixed Tether Uranium Metallocene Complexes

The synthesis of mixed tethered alkyl uranium metallocenes has been investigated by examining the reactivity of the bis(tethered alkyl) metallocene [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₂CH₂‐κC)₂U] ( 1 ) with substrates that react with only one of the U? C linkages. The effect of these mixed tether coordination environments on the reactivity of the remaining U? C bond has been studied by using CO insertion chemistry. One equivalent of azidoadamantane (AdN₃) reacts with 1 to yield the mixed tethered alkyl triazenido complex [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₂CH₂‐κC)U(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₂‐CH₂NNN‐Ad‐κ²N^1,3)]. Similarly, a single equivalent of CS₂ reacts with 1 to form the mixed tethered alkyl dithiocarboxylate complex [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₂CH₂‐κC)U(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₂‐ CH₂C(S)₂‐κ²S,S′)], a reaction that constitutes the first example of CS₂ insertion into a U⁴⁺? C bond. Complex 1 reacts with one equivalent of pyridine N‐oxide by C? H bond activation of the pyridine ring to form a mixed tethered alkyl cyclometalated pyridine N‐oxide complex [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₂CH₂‐κC)(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₃)U(C₆H₄NO‐κ²C,O)]. The remaining (η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₂CH₂‐κC)^2? ligand in each of these mixed tethered species show reactivity towards CO and tethered enolate ligands form by insertion. Subsequent rearrangement have been identified in [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₃)U(C₅H₄NO‐κ²C,O)(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₂C(?CH₂)O‐κO)] and [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₂CH₂NNN‐Ad‐κ²N^1,3)U(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₂C(?CH₂)O‐κO)].     

Azametalla-closo-dodecaboranes

The azaborate K₂[nido-NB₁₀H₁₁] is gained from nido-NB₁₀H₁₃ and K[BHEt₃] in a 1:2 ratio. The anion [NB₁₀H₁₁]^2?, which is isoelectronic with [C₂B₉H₁₁]^2?, reacts with [{η⁶-(C₆R₆) · RuCl₂}₂] (R = H, Me), [{η⁵-(C₅Me₅)RhCl₂}₂], or [Ni(PPh₃)₂Cl₂] to give the azametalla-closo-dodecaboranes MNB₁₀H₁₁ with M = (C₆Me₆)Ru ( 2 ), (C₆H₆)Ru ( 3 ), (C₅Me₅)Rh ( 4 ), and (Ph₃P)₂Ni ( 5 ), respectively. The azametallaborane K[Co(NB₁₀H₁₁)₂] ( 6 ), which contains a sandwich-type coordinated Co atom, is formed from K₂[NB₁₀H₁₁] and CoCl₂. The structure of 2 · CH₂Cl₂ was determined by X-ray diffraction. The products 2 – 6 can be derived from the icosahedral anion [B₁₂H₁₂]^2? on replacing a BH^2? moiety by the isoelectronic nitrene NH and a BH moiety by the isolobal metal-complex fragment M. The N atom is six-coordinated in the cluster skeletons 2 – 6 .     

Versatile reactivity of half-sandwich Ir and Rh complexes toward carboranylamidinates and their derivatives: synthesis, structure, and catalytic activity for norbornene polymerization

Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of carboranylamidinate‐based half‐sandwich iridium and rhodium complexes are reported for the first time. Treatment of dimeric metal complexes [{Cp*M(μ‐Cl)Cl}₂] (M=Ir, Rh; Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) with a solution of one equivalent of nBuLi and a carboranylamidine produces 18‐electron complexes [Cp*IrCl(Cab^N‐DIC)] ( 1 a ; Cab^N‐DIC=[iPrN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NHiPr)]), [Cp*RhCl(Cab^N‐DIC)] ( 1 b ), and [Cp*RhCl(Cab^N‐DCC)] ( 1 c ; Cab^N‐DCC=[CyN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NHCy)]). A series of 16‐electron half‐sandwich Ir and Rh complexes [Cp*Ir(Cab^N′‐DIC)] ( 2 a ; Cab^N′‐DIC=[iPrN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NiPr)]), [Cp*Ir(Cab^N′‐DCC)] ( 2 b , Cab^N′‐DCC=[CyN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NCy)]), and [Cp*Rh(Cab^N′‐DIC)] ( 2 c ) is also obtained when an excess of nBuLi is used. The unexpected products [Cp*M(Cab^N,S‐DIC)], [Cp*M(Cab^N,S‐DCC)] (M=Ir 3 a , 3 b ; Rh 3 c , 3 d ), formed through BH activation, are obtained by reaction of [{Cp*MCl₂}₂] with carboranylamidinate sulfides [RN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NHR)]S^? (R=iPr, Cy), which can be prepared by inserting sulfur into the C? Li bond of lithium carboranylamidinates. Iridium complex 1 a shows catalytic activities of up to 2.69×10⁶ g_PNB ${{\rm{mol}}_{{\rm{Ir}}}^{ - {\rm{1}}} }Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of carboranylamidinate-based half-sandwich iridium and rhodium complexes are reported for the first time. Treatment of dimeric metal complexes [{Cp*M(μ-Cl)Cl}(2)] (M = Ir, Rh; Cp* = η(5)-C(5)Me(5)) with a solution of one equivalent of nBuLi and a carboranylamidine produces 18-electron complexes [Cp*IrCl(Cab(N)-DIC)] (1?a; Cab(N)-DIC = [iPrN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NHiPr)]), [Cp*RhCl(Cab(N)-DIC)] (1?b), and [Cp*RhCl(Cab(N)-DCC)] (1?c; Cab(N)-DCC = [CyN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NHCy)]). A series of 16-electron half-sandwich Ir and Rh complexes [Cp*Ir(Cab(N')-DIC)] (2?a; Cab(N')-DIC = [iPrN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NiPr)]), [Cp*Ir(Cab(N')-DCC)] (2?b, Cab(N')-DCC = [CyN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10)(NCy)]), and [Cp*Rh(Cab(N')-DIC)] (2?c) is also obtained when an excess of nBuLi is used. The unexpected products [Cp*M(Cab(N,S)-DIC)], [Cp*M(Cab(N,S)-DCC)] (M = Ir 3?a, 3?b; Rh 3?c, 3?d), formed through BH activation, are obtained by reaction of [{Cp*MCl(2)}(2)] with carboranylamidinate sulfides [RN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NHR)]S(-) (R = iPr, Cy), which can be prepared by inserting sulfur into the C-Li bond of lithium carboranylamidinates. Iridium complex 1?a shows catalytic activities of up to 2.69×10(6) g(PNB) mol(Ir)(-1) h(-1) for the polymerization of norbornene in the presence of methylaluminoxane (MAO) as cocatalyst. Catalytic activities and the molecular weight of polynorbornene (PNB) were investigated under various reaction conditions. All complexes were fully characterized by elemental analysis and IR and NMR spectroscopy; the structures of 1?a-c, 2?a, b; and 3?a, b, d were further confirmed by single crystal X-ray diffraction.     

[μ‐1κ2O,O′:2(η5)‐Cyclopentadienylcarboxylato][2(η5)‐diphenylphosphinocyclopentadienyl]bis[1,1(η5)‐tetramethylcyclopentadienyl]iron(II)titanium(III)

Reacting stoichiometric amounts of 1‐(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene­carboxylic acid and [Ti(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)₂(η²‐Me₃SiC[triple‐bond]CSiMe₃)] produced the title carboxyl­atotitanocene complex, [{μ‐1κ²O,O′:2(η⁵)‐C₅H₄CO₂}{2(η⁵)‐C₅H₄P(C₆H₅)₂}{1(η⁵)‐C₅H(CH₃)₄}₂Fe^IITi^III] or [FeTi(C₉H₁₃)₂(C₆H₄O₂)(C₁₇H₁₄P)]. The angle subtended by the Ti/O/O′ plane, where O and O′ are the donor atoms of the κ²‐carboxy­late group, and the plane of the carboxyl‐substituted ferrocene cyclo­penta­dienyl is 24.93 (6)°.     

Elaboration of rac‐Like Active Species from Lewis Base Functionalized Unbridged Zirconocenes for Isospecific Propylene Polymerization

A series of ortho or meta Lewis base functionalized unbridged zirconocenes, [{1‐(E_n‐Ph)‐3,4‐Me₂C₅H₂}₂ZrCl₂] (E=NMe₂, OMe; n=1, 2), and a half‐functionalized zirconocene, [{1‐(p‐Me₂NC₆H₄)‐3,4‐Me₂C₅H₂}{1‐(p‐tolyl)‐3,4‐Me₂C₅H₂}ZrCl₂], were prepared. The crystal structures of these compounds determined by X‐ray diffraction revealed the presence of only C₂‐symmetric rac‐like isomers in the asymmetric units. In combination with methylaluminoxane (MAO) cocatalyst, the meta‐functionalized complexes afforded mixtures of polymers that exhibit multimelting transition temperatures and broad molecular‐weight distributions (MWDs) in propylene polymerization at atmospheric monomer pressure, whereas the ortho‐functionalized complexes did not give rise to polymerization. Stepwise solvent extraction of the polymer mixtures showed that the polymers consist of amorphous, moderately isotactic, and highly isotactic portions, the weight ratio of which is dependent on the reaction temperature. ¹³C NMR spectral analysis indicated that the [mmmm] methyl pentad value of the isotactic portion reached around 90 %. Among the meta‐functionalized zirconocenes, the di‐OMe‐substituted one afforded the largest amount of the isotactic portion at all temperatures, and the portion comprised 82 wt % of the crude polymer obtained at 25 °C. In contrast, propylene polymerization with the half‐functionalized unbridged zirconocene resulted in the formation of nearly atactic polypropylene with a narrow MWD of around 2. These results corroborate the proposition that the rigid rac‐like cation–anion ion pair of type [rac‐L₂ZrP]⁺[Me‐MAO]^? generated in situ, through Lewis acid–base interactions between the functional groups and [Me‐MAO]^?, is responsible for the isospecific propylene polymerization with the given class of functionalized unbridged zirconocenes and further indicate that the formation of such ion pairs can be favored by difunctionalization at the meta position of the phenyl ring with OMe groups.     

Reactions of Organic Azides with Half‐sandwich Complexes of Iridium: Preparation of Mono‐ and Bis(imine) Derivatives

Imine complexes [IrCl(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){κ¹‐NH=C(H)Ar}{P(OR)₃}]BPh₄ ( 1 , 2 ) (Ar = C₆H₅, 4‐CH₃C₆H₄; R = Me, Et) were prepared by allowing chloro complexes [IrCl₂(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){P(OR)₃}] to react with benzyl azides ArCH₂N₃. Bis(imine) complexes [Ir(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){κ¹‐NH=C(H)Ar}₂{P(OR)₃}](BPh₄)₂ ( 3 , 4 ) were also prepared by reacting [IrCl₂(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){P(OR)₃}] first with AgOTf and then with benzyl azide. Depending on the experimental conditions, treatment of the dinuclear complex [IrCl₂(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)]₂ with benzyl azide yielded mono‐ [IrCl₂(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){κ¹‐NH=C(H)Ar}] ( 5 ) and bis‐[IrCl(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){κ¹‐NH=C(H)Ar}₂]BPh₄ ( 6 ) imine derivatives. In contrast, treatment of chloro complexes [IrCl₂(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){P(OR)₃}] with phenyl azide C₆H₅N₃ gave amine derivatives [IrCl(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(C₆H₅NH₂){P(OR)₃}]BPh₄ ( 7 , 8 ). The complexes were characterized spectroscopically (IR, NMR) and by X‐ray crystal structure determination of [IrCl(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){κ¹‐NH=C(H)C₆H₄‐4‐CH₃}{P(OEt)₃}]BPh₄ ( 2b ).     

Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity of RuII Complexes with Trimethylsilylethinylamidinate Ligands

The mononuclear amidinate complexes [(η⁶‐cymene)‐RuCl( 1a )] ( 2 ) and [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)RuCl( 1b )] ( 3 ), with the trimethylsilyl‐ethinylamidinate ligands [Me₃SiC≡CC(N‐c‐C₆H₁₁)₂]^– ( 1a^– ) and[Me₃SiC≡CC(N‐i‐C₃H₇)₂]^– ( 1b^– ) were synthesized in high yields by salt metathesis. In addition, the related phosphane complexes[(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )] ( 4a ) [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )] ( 4b ), and [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )](BF₄) ( 5 ‐BF₄) were prepared by ligand exchange reactions. Investigations on the removal of the trimethyl‐silyl group using [Bu₄N]F resulted in the isolation of [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)Ru(PPh₃){(N‐i‐C₃H₇)₂CC≡CH}](BF₄) ( 6 ‐BF₄) bearing a terminal alkynyl hydrogen atom, while 2 and 3 revealed to yield intricate reaction mixtures. Compounds 1a / b to 6 ‐BF₄ were characterized by multinuclear NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P) and IR spectroscopy and elemental analyses, including X‐ray diffraction analysis of 1b , 2 , and 3 .     

Experimental and Computational Studies on the Formation of Thorium–Copper Heterobimetallics

The formation of actinide–transition metal heterobimetallics mediated by a terminal actinide imido complex was comprehensively studied. The reaction of the thorium imido complex [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₂Th=N(mesityl)(DMAP)] ( 3 ), prepared from [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₂ThMe₂] ( 1 ) and mesitylNH₂ or [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₂Th(NHmesityl)₂] ( 2 ) in the presence of 4‐(dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP), with copper(I) halides gave the first thorium–copper heterobimetallic compounds [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₂Th(X){N(mesityl)Cu(DMAP)}] (X=Cl ( 4 ), Br ( 5 ), I ( 6 )). Complexes 4 – 6 feature an unusual geometry with a short Th?Cu distance, which DFT studies attribute to a weak donor–acceptor bond from the Cu⁺ atom to the electropositive Th⁴⁺ atom. They are reactive species, as was shown by their reaction with the dimethyl complex [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₂ThMe₂] ( 1 ). Furthermore, a comparison between Th and early transition metals confirmed that Th⁴⁺ exhibits distinctively different reactivity from d‐transition metals.