共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 468 毫秒
1.
2.
在现代的高校教育改革趋势下,做好物理与数学教学间的衔接问题是培养和创造学生理性思维的一种教育方式,提高对物理和数学教学的有效衔接、提高重视是完善和发展现代高校素质教育的重要方面。针对目前高校物理和数学的教育改革现状的,不断丰富物理和数学教学改革的课题和模式,具体分析了高校教育中物理与数学的衔接的必要性、重要意义以及可行措施,以期为高校素质教育教研提供提供理论上的构建和帮助。 相似文献
3.
《物理与工程》2017,(4)
如何处理好大学与中学物理教学的衔接关系是民族院校大学物理学科教育的重要课题。笔者对北京、重庆两地6所高校558名理工类专业的学生,进行问卷调查和个别访谈,采用中央民族大学(简称U1)和其他5所高校(简称U2)进行分组对比的方法,对大学与中学的物理教育衔接问题进行了初步探讨。研究发现,U1学校理工类专业的学生在选择专业时具有一定的盲目性,U1学校学生认为大学物理知识抽象的比例要比对照组U2学校的高出7%,但是U1学校学生对物理实验的态度要比U2学校的学生更积极。为促进民族院校大学物理和中学物理教学有效衔接,笔者提出民族院校需要关注大一新生的数理基础和实验背景,注重课堂演示实验的教学,探索引入翻转课堂的教学模式等教学建议。 相似文献
4.
从大学生物理学习的现状调查入手,提出了学生难以适应大学物理学习的问题.通过大学物理与中学物理的多角度对比分析,探讨了影响二者顺利衔接的各种因素,提出了促进大学物理教育与中学物理教育更好衔接的措施. 相似文献
5.
6.
中师物理教学存在两个衔接问题:一是初中内容与中师内容的教学衔接;二是中师物理与小学自然教学的应用衔接。如何处理好这两个衔接问题,是每个中师物理教师必须探讨的课题。下面谈谈笔者的初浅认识和做法: 1 中师与初中的教学衔接 1.1 中师、初中阶段的特点 1.1.1 学生特点:初中学生的思维处于从具 相似文献
7.
基于在H校开展的“高中物理实验与大学物理实验课程衔接”的调查数据,对学生高中物理实验基础、高中与大学物理实验课程衔接存在的问题、原因等现状进行调查分析.调查结果显示:通过高中物理实验训练,学生的科学素养与态度得到较好的培养,但学生实验技能薄弱,进入大学后实验学习不适感较强.进一步研究显示,实验知识及教学方式差异大、动手能力要求提高等是造成学生学习不适感较强的主要原因.基于此,提出加强两个学段的合作交流、增设过渡性大学物理实验实验内容、设立实验课程“学业导师制”等优化措施帮助学生尽快适应课程变化、促进两个学段衔接过渡. 相似文献
8.
《广西物理》2017,(3)
物理即万物皆有理,指事物的内在规律,事物的道理,是验证和观察为基础的自然科学。学生通过中学物理的学习,对经典物理力学,电磁学,热学等方面知识有一定的理解,同时也有了一定的物理思维方法。大学物理与高中物理的衔接的问题一直以来都是高校大学物理教学要面临的难题之一。特别是对于地方高校来说,还要面临学校办学条件相对落后,师资有限,学生的基础差等问题,大学物理与高中物理的衔接的问题更加突出。本文将对大学物理与中学物理内容差异,以及大学物理与中学物理衔接出现的问题产生的原因。分析大学物理和高中物理的衔接问题,并提出相应的衔接建议,为地方高校大学物理和中学物理的衔接提供帮助。 相似文献
9.
针对我校进行特优生初升高的衔接教育,进行了物理教育教学的衔接教育研究和实践.通过问卷摸底了解学生情况,并大胆进行了教学方式的改革.实践证明,在新课程改革背景下,我们的教育教学方式应该以满足学生需求为目的,培养真正快乐主动、善于探索的具有自主思想和特点的人才.物理教育教学也应结合学科自身特点,紧紧围绕这一思路展开. 相似文献
10.
11.
Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano 《International Journal of Theoretical Physics》2017,56(1):97-128
David Finkelstein was very fond of the new information-theoretic paradigm of physics advocated by John Archibald Wheeler and Richard Feynman. Only recently, however, the paradigm has concretely shown its full power, with the derivation of quantum theory (Chiribella et al., Phys. Rev. A 84:012311, 2011; D’Ariano et al., 2017) and of free quantum field theory (D’Ariano and Perinotti, Phys. Rev. A 90:062106, 2014; Bisio et al., Phys. Rev. A 88:032301, 2013; Bisio et al., Ann. Phys. 354:244, 2015; Bisio et al., Ann. Phys. 368:177, 2016) from informational principles. The paradigm has opened for the first time the possibility of avoiding physical primitives in the axioms of the physical theory, allowing a re-foundation of the whole physics over logically solid grounds. In addition to such methodological value, the new information-theoretic derivation of quantum field theory is particularly interesting for establishing a theoretical framework for quantum gravity, with the idea of obtaining gravity itself as emergent from the quantum information processing, as also suggested by the role played by information in the holographic principle (Susskind, J. Math. Phys. 36:6377, 1995; Bousso, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74:825, 2002). In this paper I review how free quantum field theory is derived without using mechanical primitives, including space-time, special relativity, Hamiltonians, and quantization rules. The theory is simply provided by the simplest quantum algorithm encompassing a countable set of quantum systems whose network of interactions satisfies the three following simple principles: homogeneity, locality, and isotropy. The inherent discrete nature of the informational derivation leads to an extension of quantum field theory in terms of a quantum cellular automata and quantum walks. A simple heuristic argument sets the scale to the Planck one, and the currently observed regime where discreteness is not visible is the so-called “relativistic regime” of small wavevectors, which holds for all energies ever tested (and even much larger), where the usual free quantum field theory is perfectly recovered. In the present quantum discrete theory Einstein relativity principle can be restated without using space-time in terms of invariance of the eigenvalue equation of the automaton/walk under change of representations. Distortions of the Poincaré group emerge at the Planck scale, whereas special relativity is perfectly recovered in the relativistic regime. Discreteness, on the other hand, has some plus compared to the continuum theory: 1) it contains it as a special regime; 2) it leads to some additional features with GR flavor: the existence of an upper bound for the particle mass (with physical interpretation as the Planck mass), and a global De Sitter invariance; 3) it provides its own physical standards for space, time, and mass within a purely mathematical adimensional context. The paper ends with the future perspectives of this project, and with an Appendix containing biographic notes about my friendship with David Finkelstein, to whom this paper is dedicated. 相似文献
13.
《中国物理C(英文版)》2015,(6)
<正>Monthly,founded in 1977Published monthly in hard copy by Science Press and online by the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(domestic)and by IOP Publishing,Temple Circus,Temple Way,Bristol BS1 6HG,UK(international). 相似文献
18.
19.
Michael Esfeld 《Foundations of Physics》2010,40(9-10):1597-1610
The paper makes a case for there being causation in the form of causal properties or causal structures in the domain of fundamental physics. That case is built in the first place on an interpretation of quantum theory in terms of state reductions so that there really are both entangled states and classical properties, GRW being the most elaborate physical proposal for such an interpretation. I then argue that the interpretation that goes back to Everett can also be read in a causal manner, the splitting of the world being conceivable as a causal process. Finally, I mention that the way in which general relativity theory conceives the metrical field opens up the way for a causal conception of the metrical properties as well. 相似文献