共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
A covering array CA(N;t,k,v) is an N × k array such that every N × t sub‐array contains all t‐tuples from v symbols at least once, where t is the strength of the array. Covering arrays are used to generate software test suites to cover all t‐sets of component interactions. We introduce a combinatorial technique for their construction, focussing on covering arrays of strength 3 and 4. With a computer search, covering arrays with improved parameters have been found. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 14: 202–213, 2006 相似文献
2.
By Raaphorst et al, for a prime power , covering arrays (CAs) with strength 3 and index 1, defined over the alphabet , were constructed using the output of linear feedback shift registers defined by cubic primitive polynomials in . These arrays have rows and columns. We generalize this construction to apply to all polynomials; provide a new proof that CAs are indeed produced; and analyze the parameters of the generated arrays. Besides arrays that match the parameters of those of Raaphorst et al, we obtain arrays matching some constructions that use Chateauneuf‐Kreher doubling; in both cases these are some of the best arrays currently known for certain parameters. 相似文献
3.
Shoulun Long Josef Pieprzyk Huaxiong Wang Duncan S. Wong 《Designs, Codes and Cryptography》2006,40(2):191-209
Cumulative arrays have played an important role in the early development of the secret sharing theory. They have not been
subject to extensive study so far, as the secret sharing schemes built on them generally result in much larger sizes of shares,
when compared with other conventional approaches. Recent works in threshold cryptography show that cumulative arrays may be
the appropriate building blocks in non-homomorphic threshold cryptosystems where the conventional secret sharing methods are
generally of no use. In this paper we study several extensions of cumulative arrays and show that some of these extensions
significantly improve the performance of conventional cumulative arrays. In particular, we derive bounds on generalised cumulative
arrays and show that the constructions based on perfect hash families are asymptotically optimal. We also introduce the concept
of ramp perfect hash families as a generalisation of perfect hash families for the study of ramp secret sharing schemes and
ramp cumulative arrays. 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
Wiebke S. Diestelkamp 《Designs, Codes and Cryptography》2004,33(3):187-197
An important question in the construction of orthogonal arrays is what the minimal size of an array is when all other parameters are fixed. In this paper, we will provide a generalization of an inequality developed by Bierbrauer for symmetric orthogonal arrays. We will utilize his algebraic approach to provide an analogous inequality for orthogonal arrays having mixed levels and show that the bound obtained in this fashion is often sharper than Raos bounds. We will also provide a new proof of Raos inequalities for arbitrary orthogonal arrays with mixed levels based on the same method. 相似文献
7.
8.
In this paper, we consider explicit constructions of perfect hash families using combinatorial methods. We provide several direct constructions from combinatorial structures related to orthogonal arrays. We also simplify and generalize a recursive construction due to Atici, Magliversas, Stinson and Wei [3]. Using similar methods, we also obtain efficient constructions for separating hash families which result in improved existence results for structures such as separating systems, key distribution patterns, group testing algorithms, cover‐free families and secure frameproof codes. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Combin Designs 8:189–200, 2000 相似文献
9.
A replacement procedure to construct orthogonal arrays of strength three was proposed by Suen et al. [7]. This method was later extended by Suen and Dey [8]. In this paper, we further explore the replacement procedure to obtain some new families of orthogonal arrays of strength three. 相似文献
10.
The classical orthogonal arrays over the finite field underlie a powerful construction of perfect hash families. By forbidding certain sets of configurations from arising in these orthogonal arrays, this construction yields previously unknown perfect, separating, and distributing hash families. When the strength s of the orthogonal array, the strength t of the hash family, and the number of its rows are all specified, the forbidden sets of configurations can be determined explicitly. Each forbidden set leads to a set of equations that must simultaneously hold. Hence computational techniques can be used to determine sufficient conditions for a perfect, separating, and distributing hash family to exist. In this paper the forbidden configurations, resulting equations, and existence results are determined when (s, t) ∈ {(2, 5), (2, 6), (3, 4), (4, 3)}. Applications to the existence of covering arrays of strength at most six are presented. 相似文献
11.
A packing array is a b × k array, A with entriesa
i,j
from a g-ary alphabet such that given any two columns,i and j, and for all ordered pairs of elements from a g-ary alphabet,(g
1, g
2), there is at most one row, r, such thata
r,i
= g
1 anda
r,j
= g
2. Further, there is a set of at leastn rows that pairwise differ in each column: they are disjoint. A central question is to determine, forgiven g, k and n, the maximum possible b. We examine the implications whenn is close to g. We give a brief analysis of the case n = g and showthat 2g rows is always achievable whenever more than g exist. We give an upper bound derivedfrom design packing numbers when n = g – 1. When g + 1 k then this bound is always at least as good as the modified Plotkin bound of [12]. When theassociated packing has as many points as blocks and has reasonably uniform replication numbers, we show thatthis bound is tight. In particular, finite geometries imply the existence of a family of optimal or near optimalpacking arrays. When no projective plane exists we present similarly strong results. This article completelydetermines the packing numbers, D(v, k, 1), when
. 相似文献
12.
Charles J. Colbourn Sosina S. Martirosyan Gary L. Mullen Dennis Shasha George B. Sherwood Joseph L. Yucas 《组合设计杂志》2006,14(2):124-138
A covering array CA(N;t,k, v is an N × k array such that every N × t subarray contains all t‐tuples from v symbols at least once, where t is the strength of the array. Covering arrays are used to generate software test suites to cover all t‐sets of component interactions. The particular case when t = 2 (pairwise coverage) has been extensively studied, both to develop combinatorial constructions and to provide effective algorithmic search techniques. In this paper, a simple “cut‐and‐paste” construction is extended to covering arrays in which different columns (factors) admit different numbers of symbols (values); in the process an improved recursive construction for covering arrays with t = 2 is derived. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 14: 124–138, 2006 相似文献
13.
14.
Let K(n,r) denote the minimum cardinality of a binary covering code of length n and covering radius r. Constructions of covering codes give upper bounds on K(n,r). It is here shown how computer searches for covering codes can be sped up by requiring that the code has a given (not necessarily full) automorphism group. Tabu search is used to find orbits of words that lead to a covering. In particular, a code D found which proves K(13,1) 704, a new record. A direct construction of D given, and its full automorphism group is shown to be the general linear group GL(3,3). It is proved that D is a perfect dominating set (each word not in D is covered by exactly one word in D) and is a counterexample to the recent Uniformity Conjecture of Weichsel. 相似文献
15.
16.
Alexander A. Davydov 《Designs, Codes and Cryptography》2001,22(3):305-316
Coveringcode constructions obtaining new codes from starting ones weredeveloped during last years. In this work we propose new constructionsof such kind. New linear and nonlinear covering codes and aninfinite families of those are obtained with the help of constructionsproposed. A table of new upper bounds on the length functionis given. 相似文献
17.
A covering array of size N, strength t, degree k, and order υ is a k × N array on υ symbols in which every t × N subarray contains every possible t × 1 column at least once. We present explicit constructions, constructive upper bounds on the size of various covering arrays, and compare our results with those of a commercial product. Applications of covering arrays include software testing, drug screening, and data compression. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 10: 217–238, 2002; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/jcd.10002 相似文献
18.
19.
Covering arrays with mixed alphabet sizes, or simply mixed covering arrays, are natural generalizations of covering arrays that are motivated by applications in software and network testing. A (mixed) covering array A of type is a k × N array with the cells of row i filled with elements from ? and having the property that for every two rows i and j and every ordered pair of elements (e,f) ∈ ? × ?, there exists at least one column c, 1 ≤ c ≤ N, such that Ai,c = e and Aj,c = f. The (mixed) covering array number, denoted by , is the minimum N for which a covering array of type with N columns exists. In this paper, several constructions for mixed covering arrays are presented, and the mixed covering array numbers are determined for nearly all cases with k = 4 and for a number of cases with k = 5. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 11: 413–432, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/jcd.10059 相似文献
20.
A k‐GDCD, group divisible covering design, of type is a triple , where V is a set of gu elements, is a partition of V into u sets of size g, called groups, and is a collection of k‐subsets of V, called blocks, such that every pair of elements in V is either contained in a unique group or there is at least one block containing it, but not both. This family of combinatorial objects is equivalent to a special case of the graph covering problem and a generalization of covering arrays, which we call CARLs. In this paper, we show that there exists an integer such that for any positive integers g and , there exists a 4‐GDCD of type which in the worst case exceeds the Schönheim lower bound by δ blocks, except maybe when (1) and , or (2) , , and or . To show this, we develop constructions of 4‐GDCDs, which depend on two types of ingredients: essential, which are used multiple times, and auxiliary, which are used only once in the construction. If the essential ingredients meet the lower bound, the products of the construction differ from the lower bound by as many blocks as the optimal size of the auxiliary ingredient differs from the lower bound. 相似文献