Synthesis of π-(arene)metallocarboranes containing iron and ruthenium. Crystal structure of 3,1,2-(η6-1,3,5-(CH3)3C6H3)FeC2B9H11

The reaction of bis(arene)iron(II) salts (arene = mesitylene or hexamethylbenzene) or benzenedichlororuthenium(II) dimer with Tl[3,1,2-TlC₂B₉H₁₁] in THF produces neutral, air-stable π-(arene)(Fe, Ru)C₂B₉H₁₁ complexes in low or moderate yields. The metallocarboranes are formal analogues of [π-(arene)Fe, Ru)ⁿ⁺(C₅H₅)] species, and a single crystal X-ray structure of the title compound has established the closo sandwich geometry expected for the molecule on the basis of electron counting rules. The carborane cage was found to be disordered in the crystal but the essential features of the molecular geometry were not obscured. The mesitylene is symmetrically bound to the iron, and the Fe-arene (centroid) distance of 1.60 Å is similar to that found in the previously-characterized [(CH₃)₆C₆]Fe^I(C₅H₅) complex, despite the difference in the metal electronic configurations (d⁶ vs d⁷) and the change from the B₉C₂H₁₁^2? cage to C₅H₅^?. Crystals of 3,1,2-(η⁶-1,3,5-(CH₃)₃C₆H₃)FeC₂B₉H₁₁ are orthorhombic, space group Pn2₁a, with a = 12.638(4), b = 12.432(4), c = 9.686(3) Å.     

C-H activation of diphenylphosphinoaryl-derivatives with dimethyltetrakis(trimethylphosphine)iron(II)

Fe(CH₃)₂(PMe₃)₄ reacts with 1-(diphenylphosphino)naphthalene or benzyldiphenylphosphine within 4 h at 20 °C to give the novel metallated methyl iron complexes Fe(CH₃){P(C₆H₅)₂(C₁₀H₆)}(PMe₃)₃ (1) and Fe(CH₃){(C₆H₄)CH₂P(C₆H₅)₂}(PMe₃)₃ (3), respectively, via selective activation of the C-H bond of the pre-chelating ligands. The complexes are thermally unstable releasing metal through a reductive elimination of the aromatic backbone and leading to a C,C-coupling product that is regiospecifically methylated, namely 8-methyl(diphenylphosphino)naphthalene (2). Carbonylation (1 bar, 20 °C, 1 h) of complex 1 effects monosubstitution of a trimethylphosphine ligand trans to the metallated 8-C atom to afford Fe(CH₃){P(C₆H₅)₂(C₁₀H₆)}(CO)(PMe₃)₂ (4). The remaining methyl group in the parent complex 1 reacts with trimethylsilylethyne and tert-butylethyne affording the new complexes 5 and 6 bearing an alkynyl substituent trans to the diphenylphosphino anchoring group. The complexes 1 and 3-6 are diamagnetic and possess octahedral coordination geometry. All novel complexes were fully characterized by spectroscopic methods and by X-ray diffraction.     

New Class of Hydrido Iron(II) Compounds with cis‐Reactive Sites: Combination of Iron and Diphosphinodithio Ligand

The cationic complex [Fe(P₂S₂)(NCMe)₂]²⁺ (P₂S₂=(Ph₂PC₆H₄CH₂S)₂(C₂H₄) ([ 1 (NCMe)₂]²⁺)), with two MeCN ligands in a cis orientation, was synthesized and characterized. The MeCN ligand in [ 1 (NCMe)₂]²⁺ undergoes further substitution by a hydride ligand or CO to give iron(II) hydrides [H 1 (NCMe)]⁺, [H 1 H]⁰, and [H 1 (CO)]⁺. The order of reactivity of the hydrides was [H 1 H]⁰>[H 1 (NCMe)]⁺>[H 1 (CO)]⁺, and was illustrated by their reactions toward protic acids, the organic cation of 10‐methylacridinium (MeAcr⁺) as a hydride acceptor, and intermolecular hydride transfer reactions among these ferrous compounds. For example, MeAcr⁺ was reduced initially by a one‐electron transfer process from [H 1 H]⁰, resulting in competing reactions of MeAcr^. dimerization, hydrogen atom transfer from [H 1 H]⁺ to MeAcr^., and decomposition of [H 1 H]⁺. MeAcrH was produced in excellent yields through a single‐step H^? transfer from [H 1 (NCMe)]⁺ to MeAcr⁺, but [H 1 (CO)]⁺ was inactive toward MeAcr⁺.     

Reaction patterns of cyclopentadienylcobalt(I) carbonyl and acetylene derivatives

Studies have been made of photochemical and thermal reaction sequences through which bisubstituted acetylenes are transformed in (C₅H₅)Co-carbonyl reaction systems into cyclobutadiene and cyclopentadienone complexes and hexasubstituted benzenes. A primary intermediate observed by its IR spectrum in low-temperature photochemical reactions of (C₅H₅)Co(CO)₂ with diphenyl alkynes RCCR is the mixed mononuclear species (C₅H₅)Co(CO)(RCCR). At room temperature this species is converted by excess alkyne into the cyclopentadienone complex (C₅H₅)Co(R₄C₄CO). We have isolated from these reactions systems an important intermediate the mixed binuclear compound(C₅H₅)₂Co₂(μ-CO)(RCCR). In the presence of excess alkyne this compound is thermally converted either to the cyclobutadiene or to the cyclopentadienone complex of (C₅H₅)Co, depending on the partial pressure of CO in the reaction system. The mixed binuclear compound forms a catalyst for the cyclotrimerization of excess 2-butyne. The fluxional binuclear metallocycle (C₅H₅)₂Co₂[(CH₃)₄C₄], which is formed by sodium amalgam reduction of (C₅H₅)Co(CO)I₂ in the presence of 2-butyne, is a true catalyst for alkyne cyclotrimerization.     

Isocyanide addition to MN2(CO)5(Ph2PCH2PPh2)2 and the formation of a four-electron doubly-bridging isocyanide

The reactions of Fe(CO)₅, Fe(CO)₄P(C₆H₅)₃, M(CO)₆ (M  W, Mo, Cr), and (CH₃C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃ with KH and several boron and aluminium hydrides were investigated. Iron pentacarbonyl was converted quantitatively to K⁺Fe(CO)₄-(CHO) by hydride transfer from KBH(OCH₃)₃ allowing isolation of [P(C₆H₅)₃]₂-Nⁿ⁺Fe(CO)₄(CHO)^? in 50% yield. Lower yields were obtained with LiBH(C₂H₅)₃, and other hydride sources gave little or no formyl product. The stability of Fe(CO)₄(CHO)^? in THP was found to depend on the cation, decreasing in the order [P(C₆H₅)₃]₂N⁺ > K⁺ > Na⁺ > Li⁺. No formyl complexes were isolated and no spectroscopic evidence for formyl formation was observed in the reactions of the other transition metal carbonyls with several hydride sources. Fe(CO)₄-P(C₆H₅)₃ gave K₂Fe(CO)₄ when treated with KHB(OCH₃)₃. When treated with LiBH(C₂H₅)₃, W(CO)₆ gave a mixture of HW₂(CO)₁₀^?and (OC)₅W(COC₂H₅)^?; the latter was methylated to give the carbene complex (OC)₅WC(OCH₃)C₂H₅.     

The bis(acetonitrile‐κN)bis[N,N‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ethanamine‐κ2P,P′]iron(II) tetrabromidoferrate(II) and μ‐oxido‐bis[tribromidoferrate(III)] complex salts

Orange crystals of bis(acetonitrile‐κN)bis[N,N‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ethanamine‐κ²P,P′]iron(II) tetrabromidoferrate(II), [Fe(CH₃CN)₂(C₂₆H₂₅NP₂)₂][FeBr₄], (I), and red crystals of bis(acetonitrile‐κN)bis[N,N‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ethanamine‐κ²P,P′]iron(II) μ‐oxido‐bis[tribromidoferrate(III)], [Fe(CH₃CN)₂(C₂₆H₂₅NP₂)₂][Fe₂Br₆O], (II), were obtained from the same solution after prolonged exposure to atmospheric oxygen, resulting in partial oxidation of the [FeBr₄]²⁻ anion to the [Br₃FeOFeBr₃]²⁻ anion. The asymmetric unit of (I) consists of three independent cations, one on a general position and two on inversion centres, with two anions, required to balance the charge, located on general positions. The asymmetric unit of (II) consists of two independent cations and two anions, all on special positions. The geometric parameters within the coordination environments of the cations do not differ significantly, with the major differences being in the orientation of the phenyl rings on the bidentate phosphane ligand. The ethyl substituent in the cation of (II) and the Br atoms in the anions of (II) are disordered. The P—Fe—P bite angles represent the smallest angles reported to date for octahedral Fe^II complexes containing bidentate phosphine ligands with MeCN in the axial positions, ranging from 70.82 (3) to 70.98 (4)°. The average Fe—Br bond distances of 2.46 (2) and 2.36 (2) Å in the [FeBr₄]²⁻ and [Br₃FeOFeBr₃]²⁻ anions, respectively, illustrate the differences in the Fe oxidation states.     

Structural diversity of indium complexes containing a tetradentate (OSSO)-type bis(phenolate) ligand

Indium bis(phenolato) complexes [{In(CH₃)₂(THF)}₂(L)] (L = 1,4-dithiabutanediylbis(4,6-di-tert-butylphenolato) (etbbp), 2) and [In(cytp)(CH₃)]₂ (L = (1,2-cyclohexanediyldithio)-2,2′-diphenolato (rac-cytp), 3) were prepared from [In(CH₃)₃] and the tetradentate 1,2-dithiaalkanediyl-bridged bis(phenol) LH₂. The nature of the ligand bridging two indium centers was shown by X-ray diffraction studies of the complex [{In(CH₃)₂(THF)}₂(etbbp)] (2) that was synthesized from complex [In(etbbp)(CH₃)(THF)_n] (1) by reaction with a second equivalent of [In(CH₃)₃]. A related ligand without bulky substituents on the aromatic rings leads to the dimeric compound [In(cytp)(CH₃)]₂ (3) with distorted octahedral configuration in the solid state. It was converted into the cation [In(cytp)]⁺ by methyl abstraction with [B(C₆F₅)₃].     

Yttrium bis(alkyl) and bis(amido) complexes bearing N,O multidentate ligands. Synthesis and catalytic activity towards ring‐opening polymerization of L‐lactide

Methoxy‐modified β‐diimines HL ¹ and HL ² reacted with Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(THF)₂ to afford the corresponding bis(alkyl)s [L¹Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 ) and [L²Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₂] ( 2 ), respectively. Amination of 1 with 2,6‐diisopropyl aniline gave the bis(amido) counterpart [L¹Y{N(H)(2,6‐iPr₂? C₆H₃)}₂] ( 3 ), selectively. Treatment of Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(THF)₂ with methoxy‐modified anilido imine HL ³ yielded bis(alkyl) complex [L³Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(THF)] ( 4 ) that sequentially reacted with 2,6‐diisopropyl aniline to give the bis(amido) analogue [L³Y{N(H)(2,6‐iPr₂? C₆H₃)}₂] ( 5 ). Complex 2 was “base‐free” monomer, in which the tetradentate β‐diiminato ligand was meridional with the two alkyl species locating above and below it, generating tetragonal bipyramidal core about the metal center. Complex 3 was asymmetric monomer containing trigonal bipyramidal core with trans‐arrangement of the amido ligands. In contrast, the two cis‐located alkyl species in complex 4 were endo and exo towards the O,N,N tridentate anilido‐imido moiety. The bis(amido) complex 5 was confirmed to be structural analogue to 4 albeit without THF coordination. All these yttrium complexes are highly active initiators for the ring‐opening polymerization of L ‐LA at room temperature. The catalytic activity of the complexes and their “single‐site” or “double‐site” behavior depend on the ligand framework and the geometry of the alkyl (amido) species in the corresponding complexes. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 5662–5672, 2007     

Crystal structures and spectroscopic characterization of MBr2(CNXyl)n (M = Fe and Co,n = 4; M = Ni,n = 2; Xyl = 2,6‐dimethylphenyl), and of formally zero‐valent iron as a cocrystal of Fe(CNXyl)5 and Fe2(CNXyl)9

Structures and spectroscopic characterization of the divalent complexes cis‐dibromidotetrakis(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)iron(II) dichloromethane 0.771‐solvate, [FeBr₂(C₉H₉N)₄]·0.771CH₂Cl₂ or cis‐FeBr₂(CNXyl)₄·0.771CH₂Cl₂ (Xyl = 2,6‐dimethylphenyl), trans‐dibromidotetrakis(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)iron(II), [FeBr₂(C₉H₉N)₄] or trans‐FeBr₂(CNXyl)₄, trans‐dibromidotetrakis(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)cobalt(II), [CoBr₂(C₉H₉N)₄] or trans‐CoBr₂(CNXyl)₄, and trans‐dibromidobis(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)nickel(II), [NiBr₂(C₉H₉N)₂] or trans‐NiBr₂(CNXyl)₂, are presented. Additionally, crystals grown from a cold diethyl ether solution of zero‐valent Fe(CNXyl)₅ produced a structure containing a cocrystallization of mononuclear Fe(CNXyl)₅ and the previously unknown dinuclear [Fe(CNXyl)₃]₂(μ₂‐CNXyl)₃, namely pentakis(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)iron(0) tris(μ₂‐2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)bis[tris(2,6‐dimethylphenyl isocyanide)iron(0)], [Fe(C₉H₉N)₅][Fe₂(C₉H₉N)₉]. The (M)C—N—C(Xyl) angles of the isocyanide ligand are nearly linear for the metals in the +2 oxidation state, for which the ligands function essentially as pure donors. The νCN stretching frequencies for these divalent metal isocyanides are at or above that of the free ligand. Relative to Fe^II, in the structure containing iron in the formally zero‐valent oxidation state, the Fe—C bond lengths have shortened, the C[triple‐bond]N bond lengths have elongated, the (M)C—N—C(Xyl) angles of the terminal CNXyl ligands are more bent, and the νCN stretching frequencies have shifted to lower energies, all indicative of substantial M(dπ)→π* backbonding.     

Hydrido Cyanoalkyls of platinum (II)

The preparation and reactions are described of some novel platinum(II) complexes with a hydride ligand group trans to an sp³ carbon, viz. [PtH(YCN)-(PPh₃)₂] with Y  (CH₂)_n (n = 1—3) or o-CH₂C₆H₄.     

[Fe(C12H8N3O2)Cl2(ROH)], with R = Me and Et

The title octahedral complexes, [bis(pyridine‐2‐carbonyl)­amin­ate]­di­chloro­(methanol)­iron(III), [Fe(C₁₂H₈N₃O₂)­Cl₂‐(CH₄O)], and [bis­(pyri­dine‐2‐carbonyl)­amin­ate]­di­chloro‐(ethanol)­iron(III), [Fe­(C₁₂H₈N₃O₂)Cl₂(C₂H₆O)], both crystallize in space group and have similar structures. Mono­anionic bpca^? [bis(pyridine‐2‐carbonyl)­amin­ate] acts as a planar tridentate ligand in both cases. Coordination bond distances are in the range typical of high‐spin Fe^III complexes. Carbon–oxygen distances are typical of a C=O double bond suggesting the negative charge of the bpca^? ligand is localized on the central N atom.     

Eisen(II)—Phosphin-Komplexe Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Fe2I4(dppe)2], [Fe2(SR)4(dppe)2], [Fe(SR′)2(dppp)] und [Fe(SR)2(PMePh2)2] (dppe = Ph2P(CH2)2PPh2; dppp = Ph2P(CH2)3PPh2; R = 2,4,6-Me3C6H2; R′ = 2,4-tBuC6H3)

Iron(II) Phosphane Complexes. Synthesis and Crystal Structures of [Fe₂I₄(dppe)₂], [Fe₂(SR)₄(dppe)₂], [Fe(SR′)₂(dppp)] and [Fe(SR)₂(PMePh₂)₂] (dppe = Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂; dppp = Ph₂P(CH₂)₃PPh₂; R = 2,4,6-Me₃C₆H₂; R′ = 2,4-tBuC₆H₃) The title compounds were isolated and their structures determined by crystallographic methods. [Fe₂I₄(dppe)₂] ( 1 ) and [Fe₂(SR)₄(dppe)₂] ( 2 ) form dimeric complexes with the bidentate phosphane binding to different iron atoms. The resulting ten-membered rings of both compounds exhibit a nearly identical conformation. The central FeS₂P₂ units of the mononuclear complexes [Fe(SR′)₂(dppp)] ( 3 ) and [Fe(SR)₂(PMePh₂)₂] ( 4 ) show like 2 large deviations from ideal C_2v symmetry with bonding angles around the central iron atom ranging from 97.2, 92.5, and 96.5° (angle P? Fe? P in 2, 3 , and 4 , respectively) to 129.0, 129.9, and 133.6° (angle S? Fe? S in 2, 3 , and 4 , respectively).     

(η6‐Hexamethylbenzene)(mesidine)­ditriflatoruthenium(II)

The crystal structure of the title complex, (η⁶‐hexamethylbenzene)bis(trifluoromethanesulfonato‐O)(2,4,6‐trimethylanil­ine‐N)ruthenium(II), [Ru(CF₃O₃S)₂(C₁₂H₁₈)(C₉H₁₃N)], is described. The complex has the classic three‐legged piano‐stool structure with a planar arene 1.667 Å from the metal, two monodentate O‐bound tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate ligands [Ru—O 2.169 (2) and 2.174 (2) Å] and one N‐bound mesidine ligand [Ru—N 2.198 (2) Å]. The Ru—N distance is relatively long and the average Ru—O distance is relatively short when compared with previously characterized Ru^II complexes.     

Electrochemistry of coordination compounds : XVI. New mixed 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethaneacetonitrile or -carbon monoxide iron(II), iron(I) and iron(0) complexes

The new iron compound, trans-[Fe(DPE)₂(MeCN)₂] (ClO₄)₂ (DPE=PPh₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂), has been prepared and investigated electrochemically. In acetonitrile the complex shows two reduction steps, consistent with the formation of the stable iron(I) species, [Fe(DPE)₂(MeCN)]⁺ and the rather labile π-bonded acetonitrile adduct, Fe(DPE)₂(π-MeCN), respectively. Acetonitrile substitution by carbon monoxide leads to formation of the carbonylated species, which have been characterized, and examined by electrochemical techniques. A significant feature is that trans-[Fe(CO)₂(DPE)₂]²⁺, unlike trans-[Fe(DPE)₂(MeCN)₂]²⁺, takes up two electrons in a single process, the unstable d⁷ intermediate undergoing a fast disproportionation. A tentative interpretation of this behaviour is suggested.     

Aromaten(phosphan)metall-komplexe: X. Protonierungsreaktionen der dimethylruthenium(II)-verbindungen C6Me6Ru(CH3)2PR3 und eine metallzentrierte bildung von 2-styryldiphenylphosphan

The compounds C₆Me₆Ru(CH₃)₂PR₃ (I, II) react with HBF₄/OEt₂ in the presence of CO or C₂H₄ to give the arene(methyl)ruthenium(II) complexes [C₆Me₆RuCH₃(CO)PRh₃]BF₄ (IV) and [C₆Me₆RuCH₃(C₂H₄)PP₃]BF₄ (V, VI), respectively. The hydrido(2-styryldiphenylphosphane) complex [C₆Me₆RuH(PPh₂C₆H₄CHCH₂)]BF₄ (VII) is formed from V (R = Ph) at room temperature by elimination of CH₄ and formation of a new CC bond. The reaction of I (R = Ph) with 50% HBF₄/H₂O in propionic anhydride gives the compound [C₆Me₆Ru(OCOEt)PPh₃]BF₄ (III) in which the propionate anion is coordinated as a chelate ligand.     

Actinide-centered cyclometalation chemistry. An unusually distorted thorium bishydrocarbyl: Thp[η5-(CH3)5C5]2CH2Si(CH3)3]2

The crystal and molecular structure of the complex Th[η⁵-(CH₃)₅C₅]₂[CH₂-Si(CH₃)₃]₂, which undergoes facile intramolecular cyclometalation to the thoracyclobutane Th[η⁵-(CH₃)₅C₅]₂(CH₂)₂Si(CH₃)₂, is reported. While the Th[η⁵-(CH₃)₅C₅]₂ ligation is unexceptional, the Th[CH₂Si(CH₃)₃]₂ fragment is highly unsymmetrical having Th-C (corresponding angle Th-C-Si) 2.51(1) Å (132.0(6)°) and 2.46(1) Å (148.0(7)°). This conformation, which appears to result from severe intramolecular non-bonded contacts, allows a methyl hydrogen atom of one CH₂Si(CH₃)₃ ligand to approach within ca. 2.3 Å of the α-carbon atom of the other CH₂Si(CH₃)₃ ligand.     

Bemerkungen zur Synthese von Difluorphosphoranen n-Butyl-bis(dimethylamino)alkylidenphosphorane. Der Komplex {(CO)4FeC[OSi(CH3)3]CHP(n-C4H9)[N(CH3)2]2}

Remarks to the Synthesis of Difluorophosphoranes. n-Butyl-bis(dimethylamino)alkyliden-phosphoranes. Complex {(CO)₄FeC[OSi(CH₃)₃]CH?P(n? C₄H₉) [N(CH₃)₂]₂} Diethylamino-diethylaminosulfanyl-difluoro-i-butyl-phosphorane 3 is formed in the synthesis of bis(diethylamino)-difluoro-i-butyl-phosphorane from the corresponding phosphane by fluorination with SF₄ as a by-product. Synthesis, NMR spectra, and reactions of n-butyl-bis(dimethylamino)alkylidene phosphoranes are reported. n-Butyl-bis(dimethylamino)-trimethylsilylmethylidenphosphorane, 17 , reacts with Fe(CO)₅ to give the tetracarbonyliron complex 19 . The result of the X-ray structural analysis of 19 is reported and discussed.     

A rare octacoordinated mononuclear iron(III) spin‐crossover compound: synthesis,crystal structure and magnetic properties

The chemistry of transition‐metal complexes with unusually high coordination numbers has been of interest because of their application in catalytic and biological systems. Deprotonation of the ionogenic tetradentate ligand 6,6′‐bis(1H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine [H₂bipy(ttr)₂] in the presence of iron(III) and tetra‐n‐butylammonium bromide, [n‐Bu₄N]Br, in solution resulted in the synthesis of a rare octacoordinated anionic mononuclear complex, tetra‐n‐butylammonium bis[6,6′‐bis(tetrazol‐1‐id‐5‐yl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine]iron(III) methanol hemisolvate dihydrate, (C₁₆H₃₆N)[Fe(C₁₂H₆N₁₀)₂]·0.5CH₃OH·2H₂O or [n‐Bu₄N][Fe{bipy(ttr)₂}₂]·0.5CH₃OH·2H₂O ( 1 ), which has been structurally characterized by elemental analysis, powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In 1 , the coordination sphere of the iron(III) ion is a distorted bis‐disphenoid dodecahedron, in which the eight coordination positions are occupied by eight N atoms from two independent tetradentate [bipy(ttr)₂]^2? anionic ligands, therefore forming the anionic [Fe{bipy(ttr)₂}₂]^? unit, with the negative charge balanced by a free [n‐Bu₄N]⁺ cation. An investigation of the magnetic properties of 1 revealed a gradual incomplete spin‐crossover behaviour below 150 K.     

Reactivity of Cationic Agostic and Carbene Structures Derived from Platinum(II) Metallacycles

This paper describes the formation of new platinacyclic complexes derived from the phosphine ligands PiPr₂Xyl, PMeXyl₂, and PMe₂Ar (Xyl=2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ and Ar=2,6‐(2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃)₂‐C₆H₃) as well as reactivity studies of the trans‐[Pt(C^P)₂] bis‐metallacyclic complex 1 a derived from PiPr₂Xyl. Protonation of compound 1 a with [H(OEt₂)₂][BAr_F] (BAr_F=B[3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₄) forms a cationic δ‐agostic structure 4 a , whereas α‐hydride abstraction employing [Ph₃C][PF₆] produces a cationic platinum carbene trans‐[Pt{PiPr₂(2,6‐CH(Me)C₆H₃}{PiPr₂(2,6‐CH₂(Me)C₆H₃}][PF₆] ( 8 ). Compounds 4 a and 8 react with H₂ to yield the same 1:3 equilibrium mixture of 4 a and trans‐[PtH(PiPr₂Xyl)₂][BAr_F] ( 6 ), in which one of the phosphine ligands participates in a δ‐agostic interaction. DFT calculations reveal that H₂ activation by 8 occurs at the highly electrophilic alkylidene terminus with no participation of the metal. The two compounds 4 a and 8 experience C–C coupling reactions of a different nature. Thus, 4 a gives rise to complex trans‐[PtH{(E)‐1,2‐bis(2‐(PiPr₂)‐3‐MeC₆H₃)CH?CH}] ( 7 ) that contains a tridentate diphosphine–alkene ligand, through agostic C?H oxidative cleavage and C–C reductive coupling steps, whereas the C–C coupling reaction in 8 involves classical migratory insertion of its [Pt?CH] and [Pt?CH₂] bonds promoted by platinum coordination of CO or CNXyl. The mechanisms of the C?C bond‐forming reactions have also been investigated by computational methods.     

Synthesis and structure of new homo-and heteroligand carbonyl cluster complexes with [Fe3(μ3-Q)(μ3-X)] core (Q = Se, Te; X = S, As)

New cluster complexes of iron [Fe₃Q(AsCp*)(CO)₉] (Q = Se, Te, Cp* = C₅(CH₃)₅) are synthesized with the square pyramidal cluster core Fe₃QAs. A suitable procedure of the synthesis of known heterochalcogenide [Fe₃QS(CO)₉] clusters is developed. Monosubstituted [Fe₃Q(AsCH₃)(CO)₈(PPh₃)] and disubstituted [Fe₃Q(AsCH₃)(CO)₇(PPh₃)₂] clusters formed in the reactions of [Fe₃Q(AsCH₃)(CO)₉] with PPh₃ are studied. In monosubstituted clusters, the phosphine ligand is coordinated in the axial position to the Fe atom in the base of the Fe₃QAs square pyramid, while in disubstituted clusters, both phosphine ligands coordinate the Fe atoms in the pyramid base, one ligand being in the axial and another one in the equatorial position. The NMR data support the possibility of migration of the Fe-Fe bonds in a triangle in the cluster core in the case of disubstituted clusters.