Dual Representation of the Cost of Designing a Portfolio Satisfying Multiple Risk Constraints

ABSTRACT

We consider, within a Markovian complete financial market, the problem of finding the least expensive portfolio process meeting, at each payment date, three different types of risk criterion. Two of them encompass an expected utility-based measure and a quantile hedging constraint imposed at inception on all the future payment dates, while the other one is a quantile hedging constraint set at each payment date over the next one. The quantile risk measures are defined with respect to a stochastic benchmark and the expected utility-based constraint is applied to random payment dates. We explicit the Legendre-Fenchel transform of the pricing function. We also provide, for each quantile hedging problem, a backward dual algorithm allowing to compute their associated value function by backward recursion. The algorithms are illustrated with a numerical example.     

Conditional value at risk and related linear programming models for portfolio optimization

Many risk measures have been recently introduced which (for discrete random variables) result in Linear Programs (LP). While some LP computable risk measures may be viewed as approximations to the variance (e.g., the mean absolute deviation or the Gini’s mean absolute difference), shortfall or quantile risk measures are recently gaining more popularity in various financial applications. In this paper we study LP solvable portfolio optimization models based on extensions of the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) measure. The models use multiple CVaR measures thus allowing for more detailed risk aversion modeling. We study both the theoretical properties of the models and their performance on real-life data.     

随机模糊的等比例-最小方差投资组合优化研究

Markowitz的均值-方差模型在投资组合优化中得到了广泛的运用和拓展,其中多数拓展模型仅局限于对随机投资组合或模糊投资组合的研究,而忽略了实际问题同时包含了随机信息和模糊信息两个方面。本文首先定义随机模糊变量的方差用以度量投资组合的风险,提出具有阀值约束的最小方差随机模糊投资组合模型,基于随机模糊理论,将该模型转化为具有线性等式和不等式约束的凸二次规划问题。为了提高上述模型的有效性,本文以投资者期望效用最大化为压缩目标对投资组合权重进行压缩,构建等比例-最小方差混合的随机模糊投资组合模型,并求解该模型的最优解。最后,运用滚动实际数据的方法,比较上述两个模型的夏普比率以验证其有效性。     

Estimating the tails of loss severity via conditional risk measures for the family of symmetric generalised hyperbolic distributions

This paper addresses one of the main challenges faced by insurance companies and risk management departments, namely, how to develop standardised framework for measuring risks of underlying portfolios and in particular, how to most reliably estimate loss severity distribution from historical data. This paper investigates tail conditional expectation (TCE) and tail variance premium (TVP) risk measures for the family of symmetric generalised hyperbolic (SGH) distributions. In contrast to a widely used Value-at-Risk (VaR) measure, TCE satisfies the requirement of the “coherent” risk measure taking into account the expected loss in the tail of the distribution while TVP incorporates variability in the tail, providing the most conservative estimator of risk. We examine various distributions from the class of SGH distributions, which turn out to fit well financial data returns and allow for explicit formulas for TCE and TVP risk measures. In parallel, we obtain asymptotic behaviour for TCE and TVP risk measures for large quantile levels. Furthermore, we extend our analysis to the multivariate framework, allowing multivariate distributions to model combinations of correlated risks, and demonstrate how TCE can be decomposed into individual components, representing contribution of individual risks to the aggregate portfolio risk.     

Univariate and multivariate measures of risk aversion and risk premiums

This paper develops univariate and multivariate measures of risk aversion for correlated risks. We derive Rubinstein's measures of risk aversion from the risk premiums with correlated random initial wealth and risk. It is shown that these measures are not only consistent with those for uncorrelated or independent risks, but also have the corresponding local properties of the Arrow-Pratt measures of risk aversion. Thus Rubinstein's measures of risk aversion are the appropriate extension of the Arrow-Pratt measures of risk aversion in the univariate case. We also derive a risk aversion matrix from the risk premiums with correlated initial wealth and risk vectors. This matrix measure is the multivariate version of Rubinstein's measures and is also the generalization of Duncan's results for non-random initial wealth. The univariate and multivariate measures of risk aversion developed in this paper are applied to portfolio theory in Li and Ziemba [15].This research was partially supported by the National Research Council of Canada.     

与TSD准则一致的组合证券投资分析

基于预先给定的目标收益率,利用投资者对低于目标收益率的风险损失和高于目标收益率的风险报酬之间的权衡,给出了一些非对称风险度量模型,特别其中一种风险度量是低于参考点的方差和高于参考点的方差的加权和,它利用二阶上偏矩来修正二阶下偏矩,进一步建立了在该非对称风险度量下的组合投资优化模型,并证明了该模型在三阶随机占优的意义下是有效的.此外,还给出了其它3个模型与三阶随机占优准则是否一致的结论,并对所给出的几个组合证券投资模型的求解方法及其应用进行了分析.以上研究和分析为投资者在选择投资模型时避免盲目性、任意性提供了有益的决策参考.     

Conditional tail risk measures for the skewed generalised hyperbolic family

This paper deals with the estimation of loss severity distributions arising from historical data on univariate and multivariate losses. We present an innovative theoretical framework where a closed-form expression for the tail conditional expectation (TCE) is derived for the skewed generalised hyperbolic (GH) family of distributions. The skewed GH family is especially suitable for equity losses because it allows to capture the asymmetry in the distribution of losses that tends to have a heavy right tail. As opposed to the widely used Value-at-Risk, TCE is a coherent risk measure, which takes into account the expected loss in the tail of the distribution. Our theoretical TCE results are verified for different distributions from the skewed GH family including its special cases: Student-t, variance gamma, normal inverse gaussian and hyperbolic distributions. The GH family and its special cases turn out to provide excellent fit to univariate and multivariate data on equity losses. The TCE risk measure computed for the skewed family of GH distributions provides a conservative estimator of risk, addressing the main challenge faced by financial companies on how to reliably quantify the risk arising from the loss distribution. We extend our analysis to the multivariate framework when modelling portfolios of losses, allowing the multivariate GH distribution to capture the combination of correlated risks and demonstrate how the TCE of the portfolio can be decomposed into individual components, representing individual risks in the aggregate (portfolio) loss.     

Twenty years of linear programming based portfolio optimization

Markowitz formulated the portfolio optimization problem through two criteria: the expected return and the risk, as a measure of the variability of the return. The classical Markowitz model uses the variance as the risk measure and is a quadratic programming problem. Many attempts have been made to linearize the portfolio optimization problem. Several different risk measures have been proposed which are computationally attractive as (for discrete random variables) they give rise to linear programming (LP) problems. About twenty years ago, the mean absolute deviation (MAD) model drew a lot of attention resulting in much research and speeding up development of other LP models. Further, the LP models based on the conditional value at risk (CVaR) have a great impact on new developments in portfolio optimization during the first decade of the 21st century. The LP solvability may become relevant for real-life decisions when portfolios have to meet side constraints and take into account transaction costs or when large size instances have to be solved. In this paper we review the variety of LP solvable portfolio optimization models presented in the literature, the real features that have been modeled and the solution approaches to the resulting models, in most of the cases mixed integer linear programming (MILP) models. We also discuss the impact of the inclusion of the real features.     

Conditional value-at-risk in portfolio optimization: Coherent but fragile

We evaluate conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) as a risk measure in data-driven portfolio optimization. We show that portfolios obtained by solving mean-CVaR and global minimum CVaR problems are unreliable due to estimation errors of CVaR and/or the mean, which are magnified by optimization. This problem is exacerbated when the tail of the return distribution is made heavier. We conclude that CVaR, a coherent risk measure, is fragile in portfolio optimization due to estimation errors.     

Risk-adjusted probability measures in portfolio optimization with coherent measures of risk

We consider the problem of optimizing a portfolio of n assets, whose returns are described by a joint discrete distribution. We formulate the mean–risk model, using as risk functionals the semideviation, deviation from quantile, and spectral risk measures. Using the modern theory of measures of risk, we derive an equivalent representation of the portfolio problem as a zero-sum matrix game, and we provide ways to solve it by convex optimization techniques. In this way, we reconstruct new probability measures which constitute part of the saddle point of the game. These risk-adjusted measures always exist, irrespective of the completeness of the market. We provide an illustrative example, in which we derive these measures in a universe of 200 assets and we use them to evaluate the market portfolio and optimal risk-averse portfolios.     

Tail subadditivity of distortion risk measures and multivariate tail distortion risk measures

In this paper, we extend the concept of tail subadditivity (Belles-Sampera et al., 2014a; Belles-Sampera et al., 2014b) for distortion risk measures and give sufficient and necessary conditions for a distortion risk measure to be tail subadditive. We also introduce the generalized GlueVaR risk measures, which can be used to approach any coherent distortion risk measure. To further illustrate the applications of the tail subadditivity, we propose multivariate tail distortion (MTD) risk measures and generalize the multivariate tail conditional expectation (MTCE) risk measure introduced by Landsman et al. (2016). The properties of multivariate tail distortion risk measures, such as positive homogeneity, translation invariance, monotonicity, and subadditivity, are discussed as well. Moreover, we discuss the applications of the multivariate tail distortion risk measures in capital allocations for a portfolio of risks and explore the impacts of the dependence between risks in a portfolio and extreme tail events of a risk portfolio in capital allocations.     

Quantile Portfolio Optimization Under Risk Measure Constraints

This paper analyzes the problem of optimal portfolio choice with budget and risk constraints. The problem is formulated in terms of quantile functions and the risk is quantified through a large family of coherent risk measures. The solution is obtained analyzing the problem without constraints using Lagrange multipliers, getting a unique solution to the optimization problem.     

Robust spectral risk optimization when the subjective risk aversion is ambiguous: a moment-type approach

Choice of a risk measure for quantifying risk of an investment portfolio depends on the decision maker’s risk preference. In this paper, we consider the case when such a preference can be described by a law invariant coherent risk measure but the choice of a specific risk measure is ambiguous. We propose a robust spectral risk approach to address such ambiguity. Differing from Wang and Xu (SIAM J Optim 30(4):3198–3229, 2020), the new robust model allows one to elicit the decision maker’s risk preference through pairwise comparisons and use the elicited preference information to construct an ambiguity set of risk spectra. The robust spectral risk measure (RSRM) is based on the worst case risk spectrum from the set. To calculate RSRM and solve the associated optimal decision making problem, we use a technique from Acerbi and Simonetti (Portfolio optimization with spectral measures of risk. Working paper, 2002) to develop a new computational approach which is independent of order statistics and reformulate the robust spectral risk optimization problem as a single deterministic convex programming problem when the risk spectra in the ambiguity set are step-like. Moreover, we propose an approximation scheme when the risk spectra are not step-like and derive a bound for the model approximation error and its propagation to the optimal decision making problems. Some preliminary numerical test results are reported about the performance of the robust model and the computational scheme.

     

Multi-stock portfolio optimization under prospect theory

We study how a behavioral agent allocates her portfolio. We consider a cumulative prospect theory investor in a single period setting with one riskless bond and multiple risky stocks, which follow a multivariate elliptical distribution. Our main result is a two-fund separation between the riskless bond and a mean?Cvariance-portfolio, up to an exogenous benchmark portfolio. The mean?Cvariance-portfolio, which we derive explicitly, is the same for all agents. Individual risk preferences are mirrored only in the participation in this portfolio. This dependence is illustrated by considering empirical returns. Furthermore we solve ill-posed optimization problems by imposing a regulatory risk constraint. Finally we address specific parameterizations of the value function by studying power, linear, and exponential utility.     

Portfolio insurance under a risk-measure constraint

We study the problem of portfolio insurance from the point of view of a fund manager, who guarantees to the investor that the portfolio value at maturity will be above a fixed threshold. If, at maturity, the portfolio value is below the guaranteed level, a third party will refund the investor up to the guarantee. In exchange for this protection, the third party imposes a limit on the risk exposure of the fund manager, in the form of a convex monetary risk measure. The fund manager therefore tries to maximize the investor’s utility function subject to the risk-measure constraint. We give a full solution to this non-convex optimization problem in the complete market setting and show in particular that the choice of the risk measure is crucial for the optimal portfolio to exist. Explicit results are provided for the entropic risk measure (for which the optimal portfolio always exists) and for the class of spectral risk measures (for which the optimal portfolio may fail to exist in some cases).     

Portfolio insurance under a risk-measure constraint

We study the problem of portfolio insurance from the point of view of a fund manager, who guarantees to the investor that the portfolio value at maturity will be above a fixed threshold. If, at maturity, the portfolio value is below the guaranteed level, a third party will refund the investor up to the guarantee. In exchange for this protection, the third party imposes a limit on the risk exposure of the fund manager, in the form of a convex monetary risk measure. The fund manager therefore tries to maximize the investor’s utility function subject to the risk-measure constraint. We give a full solution to this non-convex optimization problem in the complete market setting and show in particular that the choice of the risk measure is crucial for the optimal portfolio to exist. Explicit results are provided for the entropic risk measure (for which the optimal portfolio always exists) and for the class of spectral risk measures (for which the optimal portfolio may fail to exist in some cases).     

信用资产组合优化的"条件在险值-补偿"型随机规划模型

本文对于信用资产组合的优化问题给出了一个稳健的模型，所建模型涉及了条件在险值（CVaR）风险度量以及具有补偿限制的随机线性规划框架，其思想是在CVaR与信用资产组合的重构费用之间进行权衡，并降低解对于随机参数的实现的敏感性．为求解相应的非线性规划，本文将基本模型转化为一系列的线性规划的求解问题．     

开放式基金投资组合风险实证—基于copula的分析

利用多元阿基米德Copula捕捉多个金融资产间的相关结构,并利用非参数核密度估计描述单个金融资产的边缘分布,建立Copula-Kernel模型。利用该模型和VaR风险测度,结合Mente Carlo模拟技术,对我国股票型开放式基金-华夏成长基金的投资组合进行风险分析。     

Using medians in portfolio optimization

Some new portfolio optimization models are formulated by adopting the sample median instead of the sample mean as the investment efficiency measure. The median is a robust statistic, which is less affected by outliers than the mean, and in portfolio models this is particularly relevant as data are often characterized by attributes such as skewness, fat tails and jumps, which may strongly bias the mean estimate. As in mean/variance optimization, the portfolio problems are formulated as finding the optimal weights, for example, wealth allocation, which maximize the portfolio median, with risk constrained by some risk measure, respectively, the Value-at-Risk, the Conditional Value-at-Risk, the Mean Absolute Deviation and the Maximum Loss, for a whole of four different models. All these models are formulated as mixed integer linear programming problems, which, at least for moderate sized problems, are efficiently solved by standard software. Models are tested on real financial data, compared to some benchmark portfolios, and found to give good results in terms of realized profits. An important feature is greater portfolio diversification than that obtained with other portfolio models.