Decision rules in detection of simple and complex tones

Detection of simple and complex tones in the presence of a 64-dB SPL uniformly masking noise was examined in two experiments. In both experiments, the signals were either pure tones (220, 1100, or 3850 Hz) or an 18-tone complex consisting of equally intense components between 110 and 7260 Hz. In experiment 1, psychometric functions were obtained for detection in a 2I, 2AFC task. Results for eight normal listeners show that the psychometric functions are parallel for simple and complex tones. As expected, the masked thresholds for the pure tones are 43-44 dB SPL independent of frequency; the masked threshold for the complex tone is about 37 dB SPL per tone. These results indicate that the simultaneous presence of signal energy in many auditory channels aids detection. In experiment 2, psychometric functions were obtained with all four signals presented in random order within a block of trials. Results for four normal listeners show that the psychometric functions are parallel to one another and to those obtained in experiment 1. The thresholds are elevated to about 46 dB for the pure tones and to 40.5 dB for the complex tone. These results are nearly, but not quite, consistent with a multiband energy-detector model using an optimum decision rule; it appears that listeners may only make an unweighted sum of decision variables across an optimum selection of channels.     

The effect of masker level uncertainty on intensity discrimination

Thresholds were measured for detection of an increment in level of a 60-dB SPL target tone at 1 kHz, either in quiet or in the presence of maskers at 0.5 and 2 kHz. Interval-by-interval level rove applied independently to remote masker tones substantially elevated thresholds compared to intensity discrimination in quiet, an effect on the order of 10+dB [10 log(DeltaII)]. Asynchronous onset and stimulus envelope mismatches across frequency reduced but did not eliminate masking. A preinterval cue to signal frequency had no effect, but cuing masker frequency reduced thresholds, whether or not masker level was also cued. About 1 to 2 dB of threshold elevation in these conditions can be attributed to energetic masking. Decreasing the overall presentation level and increasing masker separation essentially eliminates energetic masking; under these conditions masker level rove elevates thresholds by approximately 7 dB when the target and masker tones are gated synchronously. This masking persists even when the flanking masker tones are presented contralateral to the target. Results suggest that observers tend to listen synthetically, even in conditions when this strategy reduces sensitivity to the intensity increment.     

Effects of peripheral nonlinearity on psychometric functions for forward-masked tones

Psychometric functions (PFs) for forward-masked tones were obtained for conditions in which signal level was varied to estimate threshold at several masker levels (variable-signal condition), and in which masker level was varied to estimate threshold at several signal levels (variable-masker condition). The changes in PF slope across combinations of masker frequency, masker level, and signal delay were explored in three experiments. In experiment 1, a 2-kHz, 10-ms tone was masked by a 50, 70 or 90 dB SPL, 20-ms on-frequency forward masker, with signal delays of 2, 20, or 40 ms, in a variable-signal condition. PF slopes decreased in conditions where signal threshold was high. In experiments 2 and 3, the signal was a 4-kHz, 10-ms tone, and the masker was either a 4- or 2.4-kHz, 200-ms tone. In experiment 2, on-frequency maskers were presented at 30 to 90 dB SPL in 10-dB steps and off-frequency maskers were presented at 60 to 90 dB SPL in 10-dB steps, with signal delays of 0, 10, or 30 ms, in a variable-signal condition. PF slopes decreased as signal level increased, and this trend was similar for on- and off-frequency maskers. In experiment 3, variable-masker conditions with on- and off-frequency maskers and 0-ms signal delay were presented. In general, the results were consistent with the hypothesis that peripheral nonlinearity is reflected in the PF slopes. The data also indicate that masker level plays a role independent of signal level, an effect that could be accounted for by assuming greater internal noise at higher stimulus levels.     

Additivity of simultaneous masking

Simultaneous masking functions (signal level at threshold versus masker level) were obtained for equally intense maskers presented individually and in pairs. The signal was a 2.0-kHz sinusoid. The pairs of maskers were (1) two sinusoids with frequencies 1.9 and 2.1 kHz, (2) two narrow bands of noise (50 Hz wide) centered at 1.9 and 2.1 kHz, (3) two narrow bands of noise (50 Hz wide) centered at 1.8 and 1.9 kHz, and (4) the 1.9-kHz sinusoid combined with the narrow band of noise centered at 2.1 kHz. The pairs of maskers produced anywhere from 10 to 17 dB of masking beyond that predicted from the simple sum of the masking produced by the individual maskers. The amount of this "additional masking" was independent of masker level. Adding a continuous low level background noise reduced the amount of additional masking only slightly (approximately 5 dB). The data are consistent with a model in which the effects of the maskers are summed after undergoing independent compressive transformations.     

Excess masking among listeners with a sensorineural hearing loss

Three experiments were conducted to determine whether listeners with a sensorineural hearing loss exhibited greater than normal amounts of masking at frequencies above the frequency of the masker. Excess masking was defined as the difference (in dB) between the masked thresholds actually obtained from a hearing-impaired listener and the expected thresholds calculated for the same individual. The expected thresholds were the power sum of the listener's thresholds in quiet and the average masked thresholds obtained from a group of normal-hearing subjects at the test frequency. Hearing-impaired listeners, with thresholds in quiet ranging from approximately 35-70 dB SPL (at test frequencies between 500-3000 Hz), displayed approximately 12-15 dB of maximum excess masking. The maximum amount of excess masking occurred in the region where the threshold in quiet of the hearing-impaired listener and the average normal masked threshold were equal. These findings indicate that listeners with a sensorineural hearing loss display one form of reduced frequency selectivity (i.e., abnormal upward spread of masking) even when their thresholds in quiet are taken into account.     

Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration

These experiments examine how comodulation masking release (CMR) varies with masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. In experiment 1, thresholds were measured for a 400-ms, 2000-Hz signal masked by continuous noise varying in bandwidth from 50-3200 Hz in 1-oct steps. In one condition, using random noise maskers, thresholds increased with increasing bandwidth up to 400 Hz and then remained approximately constant. In another set of conditions, the masker was multiplied (amplitude modulated) by a low-pass noise (bandwidth varied from 12.5-400 Hz in 1-oct steps). This produced correlated envelope fluctuations across frequency. Thresholds were generally lower than for random noise maskers with the same bandwidth. For maskers less than one critical band wide, the release from masking was largest (about 5 dB) for maskers with low rates of modulation (12.5-Hz-wide low-pass modulator). It is argued that this release from masking is not a "true" CMR but results from a within-channel cue. For broadband maskers (greater than 400 Hz), the release from masking increased with increasing masker bandwidth and decreasing modulator bandwidth, reaching an asymptote of 12 dB for a masker bandwidth of 800 Hz and a modulator bandwidth of 50 Hz. Most of this release from masking can be attributed to a CMR. In experiment 2, the modulator bandwidth was fixed at 12.5 Hz and the signal duration was varied. For masker bandwidths greater than 400 Hz, the CMR decreased from 12 to 5 dB as the signal duration was decreased from 400 to 25 ms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: the role of temporal structure and peripheral compression

Thresholds for the detection of harmonic complex tones in noise were measured as a function of masker level. The rms level of the masker ranged from 40 to 70 dB SPL in 10-dB steps. The tones had a fundamental frequency (F0) of 62.5 or 250 Hz, and components were added in either cosine or random phase. The complex tones and the noise were bandpass filtered into the same frequency region, from the tenth harmonic up to 5 kHz. In a different condition, the roles of masker and signal were reversed, keeping all other parameters the same; subjects had to detect the noise in the presence of a harmonic tone masker. In both conditions, the masker was either gated synchronously with the 700-ms signal, or it started 400 ms before and stopped 200 ms after the signal. The results showed a large asymmetry in the effectiveness of masking between the tones and noise. Even though signal and masker had the same bandwidth, the noise was a more effective masker than the complex tone. The degree of asymmetry depended on F0, component phase, and the level of the masker. The maximum difference between masked thresholds for tone and noise was about 28 dB; this occurred when the F0 was 62.5 Hz, the components were in cosine phase, and the masker level was 70 dB SPL. In most conditions, the growth-of-masking functions had slopes close to 1 (on a dB versus dB scale). However, for the cosine-phase tone masker with an F0 of 62.5 Hz, a 10-dB increase in masker level led to an increase in masked threshold of the noise of only 3.7 dB, on average. We suggest that the results for this condition are strongly affected by the active mechanism in the cochlea.     

Informational masking by everyday sounds

Tone-in-noise detection is severely degraded when only a few spectral components of the noise are presented at random on each trial [Neff and Green, Percept. Psychophys. 41, 409-415 (1987)]. The elevations in threshold are attributed to uncertainty regarding the noise caused by sparse sampling of noise components-informational masking is the term used to describe the result. The present experiment was undertaken to determine how informational masking is affected when sparse sampling is from a set of common everyday sounds instead of noise. On each presentation a different masker waveform of constant total power was synthesized from the magnitude and phase of a fixed number, m, of spectral components (m = 2-921 across blocks of trials). The components were selected at random from 1 of 50 common environmental sounds (e.g., baby crying, door slamming, phone ringing), or 1 of 50 samples of Gaussian noise. Masked thresholds for a 1.0-kHz signal in the presence of both types of maskers were obtained using an adaptive, two-interval, forced-choice procedure. Results with noise replicated earlier, results showing largest elevations in threshold for 10-20 sampled components. Results with everyday sounds showed a similar pattern with thresholds elevated above those for noise by as much as 10 dB at the larger values of m. The differences in masked thresholds were systematically related to differences in the ensemble variance of masker spectra, as predicted by a model previously applied to noise [Lutfi, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 748-758 (1993)]. Not predicted was the result of a subsequent trial-by-trial analysis in which 9-11 dB less masking was observed for samples from everyday sounds rated as easily recognized by listeners. The results suggest that listeners fail to exploit lawful dependencies among spectral components of everyday sounds to aid detection, unless enough information is available for the sound to be easily recognized.     

Factors affecting thresholds for sinusoidal signals in narrow-band maskers with fluctuating envelopes

When a signal is higher in frequency than a narrow-band masker, thresholds are lower when the masker envelope fluctuates than when it is constant. This article investigates the cues used to achieve the lower thresholds, and the factors that influence the amount of threshold reduction. In experiment I the masker was either a sinusoid (constant envelope) or a pair of equal-amplitude sinusoids (fluctuating envelope) centered at the same frequency as the single sinusoid (250, 1000, 3000, or 5275 Hz). The signal frequency was 1.8 times the masker frequency. At all center frequencies, thresholds were lower for the two-tone masker than for the sinusoidal masker, but the effect was smaller at the highest and lowest frequencies. The reduced effect at high frequencies is attributed to the loss of a cue related to phase locking in the auditory nerve. The reduced effect at low frequencies can be partly explained by reduced slopes of the growth-of-masking functions. In experiment II the masker was a sinusoid amplitude modulated at an 8-Hz rate. Masker and signal frequencies were the same as for the first experiment. Randomizing the modulation depth between the two halves of a forced-choice trial had no effect on thresholds, indicating that changes in modulation depth are not used as a cue for signal detection. Thresholds in the modulated masker were higher than would be predicted if they were determined only by the masker level at minima in the envelope, and the threshold reduction produced by modulating the master envelope was less at 250 Hz than at higher frequencies. Experiments III and IV reveal two factors that contribute to the reduced release from masking at low frequencies: The rate of increase of masked threshold with decreasing duration is greater at 250 Hz than at 1000 Hz; the amount of forward masking, relative to simultaneous masking, is greater at 250 Hz than at 1000 Hz. The results are discussed in terms of the relative importance of across-channel cues and within-channel cues.     

A release from masking by continuous, random, notched noise

Thresholds for 10-ms sinusoids simultaneously masked by bursts of bandpass noise centered on the signal frequency were measured for a wide range of signal frequencies and noise levels. Thresholds were defined as the signal power relative to the masker power at the output of an auditory filter centered on the signal frequency. It was found that the presentation of a continuous random noise, with a spectral notch centered on the signal frequency, produced a reduction in signal thresholds of up to 11 dB. A notched noise spectrum level of 0-5 dB above that of the masker proved most effective in producing a masking release, as measured by a reduction in masked threshold. A release from masking of up to 7 dB could be obtained with a continuous bandpass noise. The most effective spectrum level of this noise was 5 dB below that of the masker. The effect of the continuous notched noise was to reduce signal-to-masker ratios at threshold to about 0 dB, regardless of the threshold in the absence of continuous noise. Thus the greatest release from masking occurred when "unreleased" thresholds were highest. The release from masking is almost complete within 320 ms of notched noise onset, and persists for about 160 ms after notched noise offset, regardless of notched noise level. The phenomenon is similar in many ways to the "overshoot" effect reported by Zwicker [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 37, 653-663 (1965)]. It is argued that both effects can be largely attributed to peripheral short-term adaptation, a mechanism which is also believed to be involved in forward masking.     

Free-field release from masking

Free-field release from masking was studied as a function of the spatial separation of a signal and masker in a two-interval, forced-choice (2IFC) adaptive paradigm. The signal was a 250-ms train of clicks (100/s) generated by filtering 50-microseconds pulses with a TDH-49 speaker (0.9 to 9.0 kHz). The masker was continuous broadband (0.7 to 11 kHz) white noise presented at a level of 44 dBA measured at the position of the subject's head. In experiment I, masked and absolute thresholds were measured for 36 signal source locations (10 degree increments) along the horizontal plane as a function of seven masking source locations (30 degree increments). In experiment II, both absolute and masked thresholds were measured for seven signal locations along three vertical planes located at azimuthal rotations of 0 degrees (median vertical plane), 45 degrees, and 90 degrees. In experiment III, monaural absolute and masked thresholds were measured for various signal-masker configurations. Masking-level differences (MLDs) were computed relative to the condition where the signal and mask were in front of the subjects after using absolute thresholds to account for differences in the signal's sound-pressure level (SPL) due to direction. Maximum MLDs were 15 dB along the horizontal plane, 8 dB along the vertical, and 9 dB under monaural conditions.     

Spectral integration in bands of modulated or unmodulated noise

Spectral integration was measured for pure-tone signals masked by unmodulated or modulated noise bands centered at the signal frequencies. The bands were typically 100 Hz wide, and when modulated, they were sinusoidally amplitude modulated at a rate of 8 Hz and a depth of 100%. In experiment 1, thresholds were first measured for each individual pure tone of a triplet in the presence of its respective masker band, and then for those three tones added together at their respective threshold levels, masked by their respective masker bands. Four sets of triplets were used: 250, 1000, 4000 Hz; 354, 1000, 2828 Hz; 500, 1000, 2000 Hz; and 800, 1000, 1200 Hz. When the masker bands were unmodulated, the amount of spectral integration was about 2.4 dB for all triplets, consistent with the integration expected based on the multiband energy detector model. When the bands were modulated, the amount of integration depended upon the spacing between masker bands; for the two widest spacings, the integration was between about 0 and 3 dB, whereas for the two closest spacings, the integration was approximately 5 dB. Experiments 2 and 3 addressed the cause of this greater spectral integration in the presence of the modulated masker bands with closer spacing. The second experiment demonstrated that sensitivity (d') was proportional to signal power regardless of whether the background noise was modulated or not, and thus the greater integration in dB in the presence of the modulated noise bands could not be accounted for by shallower psychometric functions in those conditions. Instead, the third experiment showed that the greater integration was likely due to the fact that the masker bands were comodulated. In other words, it was probably due to cues related to comodulation masking release when all three bands (and signals) were present.     

The danger of using narrow-band noise maskers to measure "suppression"

These experiments investigated whether perceptual cueing plays a role in the "unmasking" effects which have been observed in forward masking for narrow-band noise maskers and brief signals. The forward masking produced by a 100-Hz-wide noise masker at a level of 60 dB SPL was measured for a 1-kHz sinusoidal signal with a raised-cosine envelope and a duration of 10 ms at the 6-dB-down points, both for the masker alone, and with various components added to the masker (and gated synchronously with the masker). Unmasking was found to occur even for components which were extremely unlikely to produce a significant suppression of the masker: these included a 75-dB SPL 4-kHz sinusoid, a 50-dB SPL 1.4-kHz sinusoid, a noise low-pass filtered at 4 kHz with a spectrum level of 0 dB, and a noise low-pass filtered at 4 kHz with a spectrum level of 20 dB presented in the opposite ear to the masker-plus-signal. It is concluded that perceptual cueing can play a significant role in producing unmasking for brief signals following narrow-band noise maskers, and that it is unwise to interpret the unmasking solely in terms of suppression.     

Comodulation masking release in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

The acoustic environment of the bottlenose dolphin often consists of noise where energy across frequency regions is coherently modulated in time (e.g., ambient noise from snapping shrimp). However, most masking studies with dolphins have employed random Gaussian noise for estimating patterns of masked thresholds. The current study demonstrates a pattern of masking where temporally fluctuating comodulated noise produces lower masked thresholds (up to a 17 dB difference) compared to Gaussian noise of the same spectral density level. Noise possessing wide bandwidths, low temporal modulation rates, and across-frequency temporal envelope coherency resulted in lower masked thresholds, a phenomenon known as comodulation masking release. The results are consistent with a model where dolphins compare temporal envelope information across auditory filters to aid in signal detection. Furthermore, results suggest conventional models of masking derived from experiments using random Gaussian noise may not generalize well to environmental noise that dolphins actually encounter.     

Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: partial loudness

This experiment examined the partial masking of periodic complex tones by a background of noise, and vice versa. The tones had a fundamental frequency (F0) of 62.5 or 250 Hz, and components were added in either cosine phase (CPH) or random phase (RPH). The tones and the noise were bandpass filtered into the same frequency region, from the tenth harmonic up to 5 kHz. The target alone was alternated with the target and the background; for the mixture, the background and target were either gated together, or the background was turned on 400 ms before, and off 200 ms after, the target. Subjects had to adjust the level of either the target alone or the target in the background so as to match the loudness of the target in the two intervals. The overall level of the background was 50 dB SPL, and loudness matches were obtained for several fixed levels of the target alone or in the background. The resulting loudness-matching functions showed clear asymmetry of partial masking. For a given target-to-background ratio, the partial loudness of a complex tone in a noise background was lower than the partial loudness of a noise in a complex tone background. Expressed as the target-to-background ratio required to achieve a given loudness, the asymmetry typically amounted to 12-16 dB. When the F0 of the complex tone was 62.5 Hz, the asymmetry of partial masking was greater for CPH than for RPH. When the F0 was 250 Hz, the asymmetry was greater for RPH than for CPH. Masked thresholds showed the same pattern as for partial masking for both F0's. Onset asynchrony had some effect on the loudness matching data when the target was just above its masked threshold, but did not significantly affect the level at which the target in the background reached its unmasked loudness. The results are interpreted in terms of the temporal structure of the stimuli.     

The influence of time delay on forward masking when spatially separated sound image reproduced with headphone

With the virtual reproduction of headphone, the influence of delay time between masker and masked signal on forward masking when sound images are virtually spatial separated in azimuth is studied. The result shows that the thresholds tend to decrease dramatically with the increase in delay time. Furthermore, in case of spatial separation, there are differences of masking thresholds with the maximum about 15 dB. However, when the masker level is 70 dB, the difference of the thresholds increases a little as the delay time increases from 20 ms to 40 ms, which can be explained by the time integration effect and basilar membrane response.     

Asymmetry of masking between noise and iterated rippled noise: evidence for time-interval processing in the auditory system.

This study describes the masking asymmetry between noise and iterated rippled noise (IRN) as a function of spectral region and the IRN delay. Masking asymmetry refers to the fact that noise masks IRN much more effectively than IRN masks noise, even when the stimuli occupy the same spectral region. Detection thresholds for IRN masked by noise and for noise masked by IRN were measured with an adaptive two-alternative, forced choice (2AFC) procedure with signal level as the adaptive parameter. Masker level was randomly varied within a 10-dB range in order to reduce the salience of loudness as a cue for detection. The stimuli were filtered into frequency bands, 2.2-kHz wide, with lower cutoff frequencies ranging from 0.8 to 6.4 kHz. IRN was generated with 16 iterations and with varying delays. The reciprocal of the delay was 16, 32, 64, or 128 Hz. When the reciprocal of the IRN delay was within the pitch range, i.e., above 30 Hz, there was a substantial masking asymmetry between IRN and noise for all filter cutoff frequencies; threshold for IRN masked by noise was about 10 dB larger than threshold for noise masked by IRN. For the 16-Hz IRN, the masking asymmetry decreased progressively with increasing filter cutoff frequency, from about 9 dB for the lowest cutoff frequency to less than 1 dB for the highest cutoff frequency. This suggests that masking asymmetry may be determined by different cues for delays within and below the pitch range. The fact that masking asymmetry exists for conditions that combine very long IRN delays with very high filter cutoff frequencies means that it is unlikely that models based on the excitation patterns of the stimuli would be successful in explaining the threshold data. A range of time-domain models of auditory processing that focus on the time intervals in phase-locked neural activity patterns is reviewed. Most of these models were successful in accounting for the basic masking asymmetry between IRN and noise for conditions within the pitch range, and one of the models produced an exceptionally good fit to the data.     

The mid-level hump at 2 kHz

Shortening the duration of a Gaussian-shaped 2-kHz tone-pip causes the intensity-difference limen (DL) to depart from the "near-miss to Weber's law" and swell into a mid-level hump [Nizami et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2505-2515 (2001)]. For some subjects the size of this hump approaches or exceeds the size reported for longer tones under forward masking, suggesting that forward masking might make little difference to the DL for very brief probes. To test this hypothesis, DLs were determined over 30 to 90 dB SPL for a brief Gaussian-shaped 2-kHz tone-pip. DLs were obtained first without forward masking, then with the pip placed 10 or 100 ms after a 200-ms 2-kHz tone of 50 dB SPL, or 100 ms after a 200-ms 2-kHz tone of 70 dB SPL. DLs inflated significantly under all forward-masking conditions. DLs also enlarged under an 80 dB SPL forward masker at pip delays of 4, 10, 40, and 100 ms. The peaks of the humps obtained under forward masking clustered around a sensation level (SL) that was significantly lower than the average SL for the peaks of the humps obtained without forward masking. Overall, the results do not support the neuronal-recovery-rate model of Zeng et al. [Hear. Res. 55, 223-230 (1991)], but are not incompatible with the Carlyon and Beveridge hypothesis [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2886-2895 (1993)] that nonsimultaneous maskers corrupt the memory trace evoked by the probe.     

Effect of masker level on overshoot

Overshoot refers to the phenomenon where signal detectability improves for a short-duration signal as the onset of that signal is delayed relative to the onset of a longer duration masker. A popular explanation for overshoot is that it reflects short-term adaptation in auditory-nerve fibers. In this study, overshoot was measured for a 10-ms, 4-kHz signal masked by a broadband noise. In the first experiment, masker duration was 400 ms and signal onset delay was 1 or 195 ms; masker spectrum level ranged from - 10-50 dB SPL. Overshoot was negligible at the lowest masker levels, grew to about 10-15 dB at the moderate masker levels, but declined and approached 0 dB at the highest masker levels. In the second experiment, the masker duration was reduced to 100 ms, and the signal was presented with a delay of 1 or 70 ms; masker spectrum level was 10, 30, or 50 dB SPL. Overshoot was about 10 dB for the two lower masker levels, but about 0 dB at the highest masker level. The results from the second experiment suggest that the decline in overshoot at high masker levels is probably not due to auditory fatigue. It is suggested, instead, that the decline may be attributable to the neural response at high levels being dominated by those auditory-nerve fibers that do not exhibit short-term adaptation (i.e., those with low spontaneous rates and high thresholds).     

Modulation detection interference: effects of concurrent and sequential streaming

The presence of amplitude fluctuations in one frequency region can interfere with our ability to detect similar fluctuations in another (remote) frequency region. This effect is known as modulation detection interference (MDI). Gating the interfering and target sounds asynchronously is known to lead to a reduction in MDI, presumably because the two sounds become perceptually segregated. The first experiment examined the relative effects of carrier and modulator gating asynchrony in producing a release from MDI. The target carrier was a 900-ms, 4.3-kHz sinusoid, modulated in amplitude by a 500-ms, 16-Hz sinusoid, with 200-ms unmodulated fringes preceding and following the modulation. The interferer (masker) was a 1-kHz sinusoid, modulated by a narrowband noise with a 16-Hz bandwidth, centered around 16 Hz. Extending the masker carrier for 200 ms before and after the signal carrier reduced MDI, regardless of whether the target and masker modulators were gated synchronously or were gated with onset and offset asynchronies of 200 ms. Similarly, when the carriers were gated synchronously, asynchronous gating of the modulators did not produce a release from MDI. The second experiment measured MDI with a synchronous target and masker and investigated the effect of adding a series of precursor tones, which were designed to promote the forming of a perceptual stream with the masker, thereby leaving the target perceptually isolated. Four modulated or unmodulated precursor tones presented at the masker frequency were sufficient to completely eliminate MDI. The results support the idea that MDI is due to a perceptual grouping of the masker and target, and show that conditions promoting sufficient perceptual segregation of the masker and target can lead to a total elimination of MDI.