Testing the concept of softness imperception: loudness near threshold for hearing-impaired ears

Buus and Florentine [J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3, 120-139 (2002)] have proposed that loudness recruitment in cases of cochlear hearing loss is caused partly by an abnormally large loudness at absolute threshold. This has been called "softness imperception." To evaluate this idea, loudness-matching functions were obtained using tones at very low sensation levels. For subjects with asymmetrical hearing loss, matches were obtained for a single frequency across ears. For subjects with sloping hearing loss, matches were obtained between tones at two frequencies, one where the absolute threshold was nearly normal and one where there was a moderate hearing loss. Loudness matching was possible for sensation levels (SLs) as low as 2 dB. When the fixed tone was presented at a very low SL in an ear (or at a frequency) where there was hearing impairment, it was matched by a tone with approximately the same SL in an ear (or at a frequency) where hearing was normal (e.g., 2 dB SL matched 2 dB SL). This relationship held for SLs up to 4-10 dB, depending on the subject. These results are not consistent with the concept of softness imperception.     

Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments

Two experiments are described in which frequency selectivity was estimated, in simultaneous and forward masking, for each ear of subjects with moderate (25-60 dB HL) unilateral cochlear hearing losses. In both experiments, the signal level was fixed for a given ear and type of masking (simultaneous or forward), and the masker level was varied to determine threshold, using an adaptive, two-alternative forced-choice procedure. In experiment I, the masker was a noise with a spectral notch centered at the signal frequency (either 1.0 or 1.5 kHz); threshold was determined as a function of notch width. Signal levels were chosen so that the noise level required at threshold for a notch width of zero was similar for the normal and impaired ear of each subject in both simultaneous and forward masking. The function relating threshold to notch width had a steeper slope for the normal ear than for the impaired ear of each subject. For the normal ears, these functions were steeper in forward masking than in simultaneous masking. This difference was interpreted as resulting from suppression. For the impaired ears, significant differences in the same direction were observed for three of the five subjects, but the differences were smaller. In experiment II, psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) were determined in the presence of a fixed notched noise centered at the signal frequency (1.0 kHz). For the normal ears, the PTCs were sharper in forward masking than in simultaneous masking. For the impaired ears, the PTCs were similar in simultaneous and forward masking, but those in forward masking tended to be sharper at masker frequencies far removed from the signal frequency. Overall, the results suggest that suppression is reduced, but not completely absent in cases of moderate cochlear hearing loss.     

The "overshoot" effect and sensory hearing impairment

The threshold for the detection of a brief tone masked by a longer-duration noise burst is higher when the tone is presented shortly after the onset of the noise than at longer delay times. This finding has been termed the "overshoot" effect [E. Zwicker, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 37, 653-663 (1965)]. The present letter compared the size of the effect in the better and more impaired ear of six subjects with high-frequency unilateral or asymmetric hearing losses of sensory origin. Thresholds were measured for 5-ms 4-kHz tones presented 10, 200, and 390 ms after the onset of a 400-ms, 2- to 8-kHz noise burst. The better ear of each subject was tested using two noise levels, one equal in sound-pressure level and one equal in sensation level to that used for the impaired ear. Thresholds for all subjects and all ears decreased monotonically with increasing delay time, with the size of the effect typically 5 dB. Thus a small overshoot effect was observed regardless of hearing impairment.     

Binaural versus monaural loudness: supersummation of tone partially masked by noise

A series of three experiments used the method of magnitude estimation to examine binaural summation of the loudness of a 1000-Hz tone heard in the quiet and against various backgrounds of masking noise. In the quiet, binaural loudness as measured in sones, is twice monaural loudness. Two conditions of noise masking acted to increase the ratio of binaural/monaural loudness in sones above 2:1--that is, to produce supersummation. (1) When tone was presented to both ears, but masking noise to just one ear (dichotic stimulation), the loudness of the binaural tone was 30%-35% greater than the sum of the loudness of the monaural components. This increase in summation provides a suprathreshold analog to increases in threshold sensitivity observed with dichotic stimulation (masking-level differences). (2) Supersummation was also evident when tone and noise alike were presented to both ears (diotic stimulation); here, the binaural tone's loudness was 10%-25% greater than the sum of the monaural components. The increase in summation with diotic stimulation may be related to the characteristics of binaural summation of the noise masker itself.     

On the relations of intensity jnd's to loudness and neural noise

It is shown experimentally that, in contradiction of the fundamental concept of Fechner's law, the intensity jnd for auditory sinusoidal signals follows loudness, rather than its derivative with respect to sound intensity. The evidence is obtained by comparing the jnd's of a population with normal hearing to those of a population with hearing loss accompanied by loudness recruitment. Although the recruitment increases the slope of the loudness function, the jnd's of both populations were found to be practically equal when the loudness were equal. The phenomenon is accounted for mathematically by assuming that psychophysically relevant neural noise depends not only on the magnitude of loudness, but also on its derivative with respect to sound intensity. A related derivation accounts for the near miss to Weber's law.     

Dependence of loudness growth on skirts of excitation patterns

Over a range of 50 dB, the loudness of a 100-Hz tone was measured in the presence of a broadband noise with a low-frequency cutoff at 200 Hz. The noise was varied in intensity along along with the tone so that the signal-to-noise ratio remained constant at either 0 or--10 dB. Listeners judged the loudness of the tone by loudness matching, magnitude estimation, and magnitude production. The noise markedly decreased the tone's rate of loudness growth but not the range over which loudness grows. The overall decrease in steepness of the 100-Hz loudness function was greater than that previously reported at higher frequencies. It is hypothesized that the decrease was greater because the spread of excitation at 100 Hz was more effectively contained than at higher frequencies. Support for this hypothesis is given by measures of intensity discrimination at 100 Hz.     

Dead regions and pitch perception

The perception of pitch for pure tones with frequencies falling inside low- or high-frequency dead regions (DRs) was examined. Subjects adjusted a variable-frequency tone to match the pitch of a fixed tone. Matches within one ear were often erratic for tones falling in a DR, indicating unclear pitch percepts. Matches across ears of subjects with asymmetric hearing loss, and octave matches within ears, indicated that tones falling within a DR were perceived with an unclear pitch and/or a pitch different from "normal" whenever the tones fell more than 0.5 octave within a low- or high-frequency DR. One unilaterally impaired subject, with only a small surviving region between 3 and 4 kHz, matched a fixed 0.5-kHz tone in his impaired ear with, on average, a 3.75-kHz tone in his better ear. When asked to match the 0.5-kHz tone with an amplitude-modulated tone, he adjusted the carrier and modulation frequencies to about 3.8 and 0.5 kHz, respectively, suggesting that some temporal information was still available. Overall, the results indicate that the pitch of low-frequency tones is not conveyed solely by a temporal code. Possibly, there needs to be a correspondence between place and temporal information for a normal pitch to be perceived.     

Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears

Thresholds for the detection of temporal gaps were measured using two types of signals to mark the gaps: bandpass-filtered noises and sinusoids. The first experiment used seven subjects with relatively flat unilateral moderate cochlear hearing loss. The normal ear of each subject was tested both at the same sound-pressure level (SPL) as the impaired ear, and at the same sensation level (SL). Background noise was used to mask spectral "splatter" associated with the gap. For the noise markers, gap thresholds tended to be larger for the impaired ears than for the normal ears when the comparison was made at equal SPL; the difference was reduced, but not eliminated, when the comparison was made at equal SL. Gap thresholds for both the normal and impaired ears decreased as the center frequency increased from 0.5 to 2.0 kHz. For the sinusoidal markers, gap thresholds were often similar for the normal and impaired ears when tested at equal SPL, and were larger for the normal ears when tested at equal SL. Gap thresholds did not change systematically with frequency. Gap thresholds using sinusoidal markers were smaller than those using noise markers. In the second experiment, three subjects with single-channel cochlear implants were tested. Gap thresholds for noise bands tended to increase with increasing center frequency when the noise bandwidth was fixed, and to decrease with increasing bandwidth when the center frequency was fixed. Gap thresholds for sinusoids did not change with center frequency, but decreased markedly with increasing level. Gap thresholds for sinusoids were considerably smaller than those for noise bands.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Detection of interaural phase shift between a subaudible and an audible tone

Can a shift in interaural phase between a subthreshold signal and an audible contralateral probe tone affect perception of the probe? To obtain an answer, an 800-Hz tone was presented to both ears. The tone was presented continuously to one ear (-25 to + 10 dB SL) and in a sequence of four bursts per trial to the other ear (+ 10 dB SL). Interaural phase was reversed for either the second or the fourth burst in a 2 AFC task. Interaural phase-shift detection threshold (65% correct) varied with the intensity of the continuous signal; across subjects, this threshold varied from -21 to + 1 dB SL. When a 300-or 500-Hz masking tone was added to the ear with the continuous signal, phase-shift detection accuracy depended primarily upon the sensation level of the signal rather than its sound pressure level. These findings demonstrate temporal encoding at signal levels well below hearing threshold.     

Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids

The binaural free-field speech-reception threshold (SRT) in 70-dBA noise was measured with conversational sentences for 24 hearing-impaired subjects without hearing aids, with a hearing aid left, right, and left plus right, respectively. The sentences were always presented in front of the listener and the interfering noise, with a spectrum equal to the long-term average spectrum of the sentences, was presented either frontally, from the right, or from the left side. For subjects with only moderate hearing loss, PTA (average air-conduction hearing level at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz) less than 50 dB, the SRT in 70-dBA noise in both ears is determined by the signal-to-noise ratio even if only one hearing aid is used. For larger hearing losses the SRT appears to be partly determined by the absolute threshold. In conditions with a high noise level relative to the absolute threshold, in which case for both ears the SRT is determined by the signal-to-noise ratio, a second hearing aid, just as a monaural hearing aid, generally does not improve the SRT. However, in the case of a high hearing level, or a low noise level, in which a monaural hearing aid is profitable, the use of two hearing aids is even more profitable. In a separate experiment, acoustic head shadow was measured at the entrance of the ear canal and at the microphone location of a hearing aid. It appeared that, for a lateral noise source and speech frontal, the microphone position of behind-the-ear hearing aids has a negative effect on the signal-to-noise ratio of 2-3 dB.     

On the detection of early cochlear damage by otoacoustic emission analysis

Theoretical considerations and experimental evidence suggest that otoacoustic emission parameters may be used to reveal early cochlear damage, even before it can be diagnosed by standard audiometric techniques. In this work, the statistical distributions of a set of otoacoustic emission parameters chosen as candidates for the early detection of cochlear damage (global and band reproducibility, response level, signal-to-noise ratio, spectral latency, and long-lasting otoacoustic emission presence) were analyzed in a population of 138 ears. These ears have been divided, according to a standard audiometric test, in three classes: (1) ears of nonexposed bilaterally normal subjects, (2) normal ears of subjects with unilateral noise-induced high-frequency hearing loss, and (3) their hearing impaired ears. For all analyzed parameters, a statistically significant difference was found between classes 1 and 2. This difference largely exceeds the difference observed between classes 2 and 3. This fact suggests that the noise exposure, which was responsible for the unilateral hearing loss, also caused subclinical damage in the contralateral, audiometrically normal, ear. This is a clear indication that otoacoustic emission techniques may be able to early detect subclinical damages.     

Psychophysical suppression effects for tonal and speech signals.

This experiment assessed the benefits of suppression and the impact of reduced or absent suppression on speech recognition in noise. Psychophysical suppression was measured in forward masking using tonal maskers and suppressors and band limited noise maskers and suppressors. Subjects were 10 younger and 10 older adults with normal hearing, and 10 older adults with cochlear hearing loss. For younger subjects with normal hearing, suppression measured with noise maskers increased with masker level and was larger at 2.0 kHz than at 0.8 kHz. Less suppression was observed for older than younger subjects with normal hearing. There was little evidence of suppression for older subjects with cochlear hearing loss. Suppression measured with noise maskers and suppressors was larger in magnitude and more prevalent than suppression measured with tonal maskers and suppressors. The benefit of suppression to speech recognition in noise was assessed by obtaining scores for filtered consonant-vowel syllables as a function of the bandwidth of a forward masker. Speech-recognition scores in forward maskers should be higher than those in simultaneous maskers given that forward maskers are less effective than simultaneous maskers. If suppression also mitigated the effects of the forward masker and resulted in an improved signal-to-noise ratio, scores should decrease less in forward masking as forward-masker bandwidth increased, and differences between scores in forward and simultaneous maskers should increase, as was observed for younger subjects with normal hearing. Less or no benefit of suppression to speech recognition in noise was observed for older subjects with normal hearing or hearing loss. In general, as suppression measured with tonal signals increased, the combined benefit of forward masking and suppression to speech recognition in noise also increased.     

Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression measurements were made in 20 subjects with normal hearing and 21 subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The probe consisted of two primary tones (f2, f1), with f2 held constant at 4 kHz and f2/f1 = 1.22. Primary levels (L1, L2) were set according to the equation L1 = 0.4 L2 + 39 dB [Kummer et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444 (1998)], with L2 ranging from 20 to 70 dB SPL (normal-hearing subjects) and 50-70 dB SPL (subjects with hearing loss). Responses elicited by the probe were suppressed by a third tone (f3), varying in frequency from 1 octave below to 1/2 octave above f2. Suppressor level (L3) varied from 5 to 85 dB SPL. Responses in the presence of the suppressor were subtracted from the unsuppressed condition in order to convert the data into decrements (amount of suppression). The slopes of the decrement versus L3 functions were less steep for lower frequency suppressors and more steep for higher frequency suppressors in impaired ears. Suppression tuning curves, constructed by selecting the L3 that resulted in 3 dB of suppression as a function of f3, resulted in tuning curves that were similar in appearance for normal and impaired ears. Although variable, Q10 and Q(ERB) were slightly larger in impaired ears regardless of whether the comparisons were made at equivalent SPL or equivalent sensation levels (SL). Larger tip-to-tail differences were observed in ears with normal hearing when compared at either the same SPL or the same SL, with a much larger effect at similar SL. These results are consistent with the view that subjects with normal hearing and mild-to-moderate hearing loss have similar tuning around a frequency for which the hearing loss exists, but reduced cochlear-amplifier gain.     

Overshoot in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Overshoot was measured in both ears of four subjects with normal hearing and in five subjects with permanent, sensorineural hearing loss (two with a unilateral loss). The masker was a 400-ms broadband noise presented at a spectrum level of 20, 30, or 40 dB SPL. The signal was a 10-ms sinusoid presented 1 or 195 ms after the onset of the masker. Signal frequency was 1.0 or 4.0 kHz, which placed the signal in a region of normal (1.0 kHz) or impaired (4.0 kHz) absolute sensitivity for the impaired ears. For the normal-hearing subjects, the effects of signal frequency and masker level were similar to those published previously. In particular, overshoot was larger at 4.0 than at 1.0 kHz, and overshoot at 4.0 kHz tended to decrease with increasing masker level. At 4.0 kHz, overshoot values were significantly larger in the normal ears: Maximum values ranged from about 7-26 dB in the normal ears, but were always less than 5 dB in the impaired ears. The smaller overshoot values resulted from the fact that thresholds in the short-delay condition were considerably better in the hearing-impaired subjects than in the normal-hearing subjects. At 1.0 kHz, overshoot values for the two groups of subjects more or less overlapped. The results suggest that permanent, sensorineural hearing loss disrupts the mechanisms responsible for a large overshoot effect.     

Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects

A two-alternative forced-choice task was used to measure psychometric functions for the detection of temporal gaps in a 1-kHz, 400-ms sinusoidal signal. The signal always started and finished at a positive-going zero crossing, and the gap duration was varied from 0.5 to 6.0 ms in 0.5-ms steps. The signal level was 80 dB SPL, and a spectrally shaped noise was used to mask splatter associated with the abrupt onset and offset of the signal. Two subjects with normal hearing, two subjects with unilateral cochlear hearing loss, and two subjects with bilateral cochlear hearing loss were tested. The impaired ears had confirmed reductions in frequency selectivity at 1 kHz. For the normal ears, the psychometric functions were nonmonotonic, showing minima for gap durations corresponding to integer multiples of the signal period (n ms, where n is a positive integer) and maxima for durations corresponding to (n - 0.5) ms. For the impaired ears, the psychometric functions showed only small (nonsignificant) nonmonotonicities. Performance overall was slightly worse for the impaired than for the normal ears. The main features of the results could be accounted for using a model consisting of a bandpass filter (the auditory filter), a square-law device, and a sliding temporal integrator. Consistent with the data, the model demonstrates that, although a broader auditory filter has a faster transient response, this does not necessarily lead to improved performance in a gap detection task. The model also indicates that gap thresholds do not provide a direct measure of temporal resolution, since they depend at least partly on intensity resolution.     

Decrement detection in normal and impaired ears.

The smallest detectable duration of a brief decrement in the intensity of wideband noise was measured as a function of the depth of the decrement. In the first experiment, conditions were tested in which the noise before the decrement was more intense than the noise after the decrement, and vice-versa. These data were used to estimate the shape of an intensity-weighting function, or temporal window, describing the temporal resolution of the ear. The equivalent rectangular durations (ERDs) of the temporal windows measured in this way had values of about 5.5, 4.6, and 6.6 ms for noise spectrum levels of 10, 30, and 50 dB, respectively. In a second experiment, decrement detection was measured in subjects with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. One set of thresholds was measured in the impaired ear, and two sets of thresholds were measured in the normal ear; one with the noise level at equal SPL to the level in the impaired ear, and one with the noise at equal SL. Temporal window shapes were also estimated from these data. Only one of the subjects showed reduced temporal resolution in the impaired ear, the other two subjects having similar ERD values for all three conditions.     

Loudness relations for individuals and groups in normal and impaired hearing

Individual and group loudness relations were obtained at a frequency in the region of impaired hearing for 100 people, 98 with bilateral cochlear impairment. Slope distributions were determined from absolute magnitude estimation (AME) and absolute magnitude production (AMP) of loudness; they were also derived from cross-modality matching (CMM) and AME of apparent length. With respect to both the means and the individual slope values, the two distributions closely agree. More than half of the measured deviations are less than 20%, with an overall average of -1.5%, meaning that transitivity is preserved for bilaterally impaired individuals. Moreover, over the stimulus range where cochlear impairment steepens the loudness function, both the group means and the individual slope values are clearly larger than in normal hearing. The results also show that, for groups of people with approximately similar losses, the standard deviation is a nearly constant proportion of the mean slope value giving a coefficient of variation of about 27% in normal and impaired hearing. This indicates, in accord with loudness matching, that the size of the slopes depends directly on the degree of hearing loss. The results disclose that loudness measurements obtained by magnitude scaling are able to reveal the operating characteristic of the ear for individuals.     

Loudness reduction induced by a contralateral tone

The induced reduction in the loudness (ILR) of a weaker tone caused by a preceding stronger tone was measured with both tones in the same ear (ipsilateral ILR) and also in opposite ears (contralateral ILR). The two tones were always equal in duration and were presented repeatedly over several minutes. When the tone duration was 200 ms, for 24 listeners the loudness reduction averaged 11 dB under ipsilateral ILR and 6 dB under contralateral ILR. When the duration was 5 ms, ILR was 8 dB whether ipsilateral or contralateral. For each duration, ipsilateral and contralateral ILR were strongly correlated (r around 0.80).     

Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments

The shape of the auditory filter was estimated at three center frequencies, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz, for five subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. Additional measurements were made at 1.0 kHz using one subject with a unilateral impairment and six subjects with bilateral impairments. Subjects were chosen who had thresholds in the impaired ears which were relatively flat as a function of frequency and ranged from 15 to 70 dB HL. The filter shapes were estimated by measuring thresholds for sinusoidal signals (frequency f) in the presence of two bands of noise, 0.4 f wide, one above and one below f. The spectrum level of the noise was 50 dB (re: 20 mu Pa) and the noise bands were placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically about the signal frequency. The deviation of the nearer edge of each noise band from f varied from 0.0 to 0.8 f. For the normal ears, the filters were markedly asymmetric for center frequencies of 1.0 and 2.0 kHz, the high-frequency branch being steeper. At 0.5 kHz, the filters were more symmetric. For the impaired ears, the filter shapes varied considerably from one subject to another. For most subjects, the lower branch of the filter was much less steep than normal. The upper branch was often less steep than normal, but a few subjects showed a near normal upper branch. For the subjects with unilateral impairments, the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of the filter was always greater for the impaired ear than for the normal ear at each center frequency. For three subjects at 0.5 kHz and one subject at 1.0 kHz, the filter had too little selectivity for its shape to be determined.     

Loudness reduction and adaptation induced by a contralateral tone

An intermittent tone in one ear may induce a large decline in the loudness of a continuous tone in the contralateral ear [Botte et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 727-739 (1982)]. To uncover the basis for this induced loudness adaptation, the method of successive magnitude estimations was used to measure the loudness of a test tone in one ear during and after a single presentation of a brief inducer tone in the contralateral ear. Duration and frequency of the inducer were varied. The frequency of the test tone was set at 500, 1000, or 3000 Hz. Both inducer and test tones were at 60 dB SPL. When the inducer lasted 5 s or more and was at the same frequency as the test tone, the loudness of the test tone was reduced by 80% to 100% while the inducer was on. As the inducer frequency moved away from the test tone, the loudness reduction declined gradually except for a more marked drop at the point where the frequency separation exceeded the critical bandwidth. Loudness remained depressed after the inducer went off. Additional measurements showed that the amount of loudness reduction corresponded closely to the measured movement of the inducer's sound image away from the center of the listener's head (decentralization).