Platinum complexes of oxopurines: cis‐bis(theophyllinato‐N7)bis(triphenylphosphine)platinum(II) and cis‐chloro(theobrominato‐N1)bis(triphenylphosphine)platinum(II) ethanol hemisolvate

The syntheses and structures of two mixed‐ligand complexes of platinum(II) with deprotonated oxopurine bases and tri­phenyl­phosphine are reported, namely the theophyllinate complex cis‐bis(1,2,3,6‐tetra­hydro‐1,3‐di­methyl­purine‐2,6‐dionato‐κN⁷)­bis(tri­phenyl­phosphine‐κP)­platinum(II), [Pt(C₇H₇N₄O₂)₂(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂], (I), and the theobrominate complex cis‐chloro(1,2,3,6‐tetrahydro‐3,7‐dimethylpurine‐2,6‐dionato‐κN¹)­bis(tri­phenyl­phosphine‐κP)­platinum(II) ethanol hemisolvate, [PtCl(C₇H₇N₄O₂)(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂]·0.5C₂H₅OH, (II). In (I), the coordination geometry of Pt is square planar, formed by the two coordinating N atoms of the theophyl­linate anions in a cis arrangement and two P atoms from the tri­phenyl­phosphine groups. In (II), there are two crystallographically independent mol­ecules. They both exhibit a square‐planar coordination geometry around Pt involving one Cl atom, the coordinating N atom of the theobrominate anion and two P atoms from the tri­phenyl­phosphine groups. The two tri­phenyl­phosphine groups are arranged in a cis configuration in both structures. The heterocyclic rings are rotated with respect to the coordination plane of the metal by 82.99 (8) and 88.09 (8)° in complex (I), and by 85.91 (16) and 88.14 (18)° in complex (II). Both structures are stabilized by intramolecular stacking interactions involving the purine rings and the phenyl rings of adjacent tri­phenyl­phosphine moieties.     

Synthesis, Crystal Structure of Ruthenium 1,2－Naphthoquinone－1－oxime Complex and Its Mediated C－－C Coupling Reactions of Ter－minal Alkynes

Substituted decarbonylation reaction of ruthenium 1,2‐naphthoquinone‐1‐oxime (1‐nqo) complex, cis‐, cis‐[Ru| ζ²‐N(O)C₁₀‐H₆O|₂(CO)₂] (1), with acetonitrile gave cis‐, cis‐[Ru | ζ²‐ N(O)C₁₀H₆O|₂(CO)(NCMe)] (2). Complex 2 was fully characterized by ¹H NMR, FAB MS, IR spectra and single crystal X‐ray analysis. Complex 2 maintains the coordination structure of 1 with the two naphthoquinonic oxygen atoms, as well as the two oximato nitrogen atoms located cis to each other, showing that there is no ligand rearrangement of the 1‐nqo ligands during the substitution reaction. The carbonyl group originally trans to the naphthoquinonic oxygen in one 1‐nqo ligand is left in its original position [O(5)‐Ru‐C(1), 174.0(6)°], while the other one originally trans to the oximato group of the other 1‐nqo ligand is substituted by NCMe [N(1)‐Ru‐N(3), 170.6(6)°]. This shows that the carbonyl trans to oximato group is more labile than the one trans to naphthoquinonic O atom towards substitution. This is probably due to the comparatively stronger ± back bonding from ruthenium metal to the carbonyl group trans to naphthoquinonic O atom, than the one trans to oximato group, resulting in the comparatively weaker Ru–‐CO bond for the latter and consequently easier replacement of this carbonyl. Selected coupling of phenylacetylene mediated by 2 gave a single trans‐dimerization product 3, while 2 mediated coupling reaction of methyl propiolate produced three products: one trans‐dimerization product 4 and two cyclotrimeric products 5 and 6.     

Dinuclear Tin(II) Complex of a Bulky cis‐Oxamide: Synthesis,Characterization, Crystal Structure,and DFT Studies

The reaction of the di‐lithiated oxamide of 1 with two equivalents of SnCl₂ provided the tin trans‐oxamide 3 . In solution, spectroscopic analysis suggests exclusively the formation of a trans‐oxamide (trans‐ 3 ). However, the solid state shows an atypical cis‐oxamide (cis‐ 3 ), where the oxamide fragment acts as an anti‐Janus head ligand. An ¹¹⁹Sn‐NMR variable temperature experiment ([D₈]THF) of the trans‐oxamide (trans‐ 3 ) was performed however, at lower temperature no additional signal was observed, which confirmed the absence of a dynamic equilibrium. Dispersion‐corrected density functional calculations revealed that the cis conformation of this tin(II) oxamide complex is more stable than the trans isomer by 1.4 kcal · mol^–1.     

Coordination‐Driven Macrocyclization for Locking of Photo‐ and Thermal cis→trans Isomerization of Azobenzene

Both trans and cis isomers of azobenzene‐linked bis‐terpyridine ligand L1 were incorporated in rigid macrocycles linked by Fe^II(tpy)₂ (tpy: terpyridine) units. The complex of the longer trans‐ L1 is dinuclear [(trans‐ L1 )₂ ? Fe^II₂], whereas the complex of the shorter cis‐ L1 is mononuclear [cis‐ L1? Fe^II]. The complex cis‐ L1? Fe^II was not only thermally stable but also photochemically inactive. These results indicate a perfectly locked state of cis‐azobenzene. The stable macrocyclic structure of cis‐ L1? Fe^II causes locking of the isomerization. To the best of our knowledge, this is first example of dual locking of photo‐ and thermal isomerization of cis‐azobenzene.     

Mechanistic Studies of Hoveyda–Grubbs Metathesis Catalysts Bearing S‐, Br‐, I‐, and N‐coordinating Naphthalene Ligands

Derivatives of the Hoveyda–Grubbs complex bearing S‐, Br‐, I‐, and N‐coordinating naphthalene ligands were synthesized and characterized with NMR and X‐ray studies. Depending on the arrangement of the coordinating sites on the naphthalene core, the isomeric catalysts differ in activity in model metathesis reactions. In particular, complexes with the Ru?CH bond adjacent to the second aromatic ring of the ligand suffer from difficulties experienced on their preparation and initiation. The behavior most probably derives from steric hindrance around the double bond and repulsive intraligand interactions, which result in abnormal chemical shifts of benzylidene protons observed with ¹H NMR. Furthermore EXSY studies revealed that the halogen‐chelated ruthenium complexes display an equilibrium, in which major cis‐Cl₂ structures are accompanied with small amounts of isomeric forms. In general, contents of the minor forms, measured at 80 °C, correlate with the observed activity trends of the catalysts, although some exceptions complicate the mechanistic picture. We assume that for the family of halogen‐chelated metathesis catalysts the initiation mechanism starts with the cis‐Cl₂?trans‐Cl₂ isomerization, although further steps may become rate‐limiting for selected systems.     

cis,cis,cis‐(Acetato‐O,O′)­bis­[1,2‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ethane‐P,P′]­ruthenium(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate di­methanol solvate

In the cation of the title complex, cis,cis,cis‐[Ru(η²‐O₂CMe)(dppe)₂]PF₆·2MeOH [dppe is 1,2‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ethane, C₂₆H₂₄P₂], the Ru atom is in a pseudo‐octahedral coordination environment with two chelating dppe ligands and one chelating acetate ligand. Intra‐phosphine and intra‐acetate bond lengths and angles are unexceptional. Deviations from idealized octahedral coordination angles at ruthenium [O—Ru—O 59.43 (8)° and P—Ru—P 103.19 (2)°] presumably derive from constraints imposed by the chelate rings. The Ru—P distances for the mutually trans P‐donor atoms [2.3785 (6) Å] are significantly longer than those for the Ru—P linkages trans to the acetate ligand [2.3074 (6) Å]. The Ru1, C1 and C2 atoms lie on a twofold axis, and atom P3 of the anion lies on an inversion centre.     

Steric and Electronic Effects of Bidentate Phosphine Ligands on Ruthenium(II)‐Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide

The reactivity difference between the hydrogenation of CO₂ catalyzed by various ruthenium bidentate phosphine complexes was explored by DFT. In addition to the ligand dmpe (Me₂PCH₂CH₂PMe₂), which was studied experimentally previously, a more bulky diphosphine ligand, dmpp (Me₂PCH₂CH₂CH₂PMe₂), together with a more electron‐withdrawing diphosphine ligand, PN^MeP (Me₂PCH₂N^MeCH₂PMe₂), have been studied theoretically to analyze the steric and electronic effects on these catalyzed reactions. Results show that all of the most favorable pathways for the hydrogenation of CO₂ catalyzed by bidentate phosphine ruthenium dihydride complexes undergo three major steps: cis–trans isomerization of ruthenium dihydride complex, CO₂ insertion into the Ru?H bond, and H₂ insertion into the ruthenium formate ion. Of these steps, CO₂ insertion into the Ru?H bond has the lowest barrier compared with the other two steps in each preferred pathway. For the hydrogenation of CO₂ catalyzed by ruthenium complexes of dmpe and dmpp, cis–trans isomerization of ruthenium dihydride complex has a similar barrier to that of H₂ insertion into the ruthenium formate ion. However, in the reaction catalyzed by the PN^MePRu complex, cis–trans isomerization of the ruthenium dihydride complex has a lower barrier than H₂ insertion into the ruthenium formate ion. These results suggest that the steric effect caused by the change of the outer sphere of the diphosphine ligand on the reaction is not clear, although the electronic effect is significant to cis–trans isomerization and H₂ insertion. This finding refreshes understanding of the mechanism and provides necessary insights for ligand design in transition‐metal‐catalyzed CO₂ transformation.     

Uranium–Carbene–Imido Metalla‐Allenes: Ancillary‐Ligand‐Controlled cis‐/trans‐Isomerisation and Assessment of trans Influence in the R2C=UIV=NR′ Unit (R=Ph2PNSiMe3; R′=CPh3)

Uranium(IV)–carbene–imido complexes [U(BIPM^TMS)(NCPh₃)(κ²‐N,N′‐BIPY)] ( 2 ; BIPM^TMS=C(PPh₂NSiMe₃)₂; BIPY=2,2‐bipyridine) and [U(BIPM^TMS)(NCPh₃)(DMAP)₂] ( 3 ; DMAP=4‐dimethylamino‐pyridine) that contain unprecedented, discrete R₂C=U=NR′ units are reported. These complexes complete the family of E=U=E (E=CR₂, NR, O) metalla‐allenes with feasible first‐row hetero‐element combinations. Intriguingly, 2 and 3 contain cis‐ and trans‐C=U=N units, respectively, representing rare examples of controllable cis/trans isomerisation in f‐block chemistry. This work reveals a clear‐cut example of the trans influence in a mid‐valent uranium system, and thus a strong preference for the cis isomer, which is computed in a co‐ligand‐free truncated model—to isolate the electronic trans influence from steric contributions—to be more stable than the trans isomer by approximately 12 kJ mol^?1 with an isomerisation barrier of approximately 14 kJ mol^?1.     

trans‐Bis(isothiocyanato‐κN)bis(methanol‐κO)bis[2,4,6‐tri(4‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine‐κN2]manganese(II)

The title compound, [Mn(NCS)₂(C₁₈H₁₂N₆)₂(CH₄O)₂], con­tains a centrosymmetric octahedral Mn^II centre and three pairs of trans‐coordinating ligands. It is the first example of a mononuclear metal complex with the 2,4,6‐tri(4‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine (tpt) ligand. Intermolecular π–π stacking of the planar tpt ligands, as well as hydrogen bonds between pyridyl N and methanol H atoms, results in the formation of a three‐dimensional network.     

Disentangling steric and electronic factors in monomeric bis(2‐bromo‐4‐chloro‐6‐{[(2‐hydroxyethyl)imino]methyl}phenolato‐κ2N,O)copper(II)

The title compound, [Cu(C₉H₈BrClNO₂)₂], is a square‐planar complex. The potentially tridentate dibasic 2‐bromo‐4‐chloro‐6‐{[(2‐hydroxyethyl)imino]methyl}phenolate ligand coordinates in a trans‐bis fashion to the Cu^II centre via the imine N and phenolate O atoms. The Cu^II atom lies on the centre of inversion of the molecule. The potentially coordinating hydroxyethyl group remains protonated and uncoordinated, taking part in intermolecular hydrogen bonds with vicinal groups, leading to the formation of a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bond network with sheets parallel to the (10) plane. Substituent effects on the crystal packing and coordination modes of the ligand are discussed.     

Palladium(II) acetate catalyzed efficient synthesis of N‐aryl‐α,β‐unsaturated amides via carbonylative addition of aniline derivatives to aromatic alkynes

A series of new N‐aryl‐α,β‐disubstituted amides (gem or E1; trans or E2) were synthesized in good yields by carbonylative addition of aniline derivatives 1a–f to aromatic alkynes 2a,b catalyzed by Pd(OAc)₂ and 1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane. The catalytic synthesis of tertiary α,β‐unsaturated amides was also successfully achieved. Traces of products were observed in the absence of p‐toluenesulfonic acid used as an additive. The reaction is sensitive to the type of phosphine ligand and solvent. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

On the reactivity of platina‐β‐diketones: a straightforward synthesis of trans‐acetylchlorobis(phosphine)platinum(II) complexes and their reactivity

The platina‐β‐diketone [Pt₂{(COMe)₂H}₂(µ‐Cl)₂] ( 1 ) was found to react with monodentate phosphines to yield acetyl(chloro)platinum(II) complexes trans‐[Pt(COMe)Cl(PR₃)₂] (PR₃ = PPh₃, 2a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 2b ; PMePh₂, 2c ; PMe₂Ph, 2d ; P(n‐Bu)₃, 2e ; P(o‐tol)₃, 2f ; P(m‐tol)₃, 2g ; P(p‐tol)₃, 2h ). In the reaction with P(o‐tol)₃ the methyl(carbonyl)platinum(II) complex [Pt(Me)Cl(CO){P(o‐tol)₃}] ( 3a ) was found to be an intermediate. On the other hand, treating 1 with P(C₆F₅)₃ led to the formation of [Pt(Me)Cl(CO){P(C₆F₅)₃}] ( 3b ), even in excess of the phosphine. Phosphine ligands with a lower donor capability in complexes 2 and the arsine ligand in trans‐[Pt(COMe)Cl(AsPh₃)₂] ( 2i ) proved to be subject to substitution by stronger donating phosphine ligands, thus forming complexes trans‐[Pt(COMe)Cl(L)L′] (L/L′ = AsPh₃/PPh₃, 4a ; PPh₃/P(n‐Bu)₃, 4b ) and cis‐[Pt(COMe)Cl(dppe)] ( 4c ). Furthermore, in boiling benzene, complexes 2a – 2c and 2i underwent decarbonylation yielding quantitatively methyl(chloro)platinum(II) complexes trans‐[Pt(Me)Cl(L)₂] (L = PPh₃, 5a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 5b ; PMePh₂, 5c ; AsPh₃, 5d ). The identities of all complexes were confirmed by ¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses of 2a ·2CHCl₃, 2f and 5b showed that the platinum atom is square‐planar coordinated by two phosphine ligands (PPh₃, 2a ; P(o‐tol)₃, 2f ; P(4F‐C₆H₄)₃, 5b ) in mutual trans position as well as by an acetyl ligand ( 2a, 2f ) and a methyl ligand ( 5b ), respectively, trans to a chloro ligand. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis of 3b exhibited a square‐planar platinum complex with the two π‐acceptor ligands CO and P(C₆F₅)₃ in mutual cis position (configuration index: SP‐4‐3). Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The Key Role of the Nonchelating Conformation of the Benzylidene Ligand on the Formation and Initiation of Hoveyda–Grubbs Metathesis Catalysts

Experimental studies of Hoveyda–Grubbs metathesis catalysts reveal important consequences of substitution at the 6‐position of the chelating benzylidene ligand. The structural modification varies conformational preferences of the ligand that affects its exchange due to the interaction of the coordinating site with the ruthenium center. As a consequence, when typical S‐chelated systems are formed as kinetic trans‐Cl₂ products, for 6‐substituted benzylidenes the preference is altered toward direct formation of thermodynamic cis‐Cl₂ isomers. Activity data and reactions with tricyclohexylphosphine (PCy₃) support also a similar scenario for O‐chelated complexes, which display fast trans‐Cl₂?cis‐Cl₂ equilibrium observed by NMR EXSY studies. The presented conformational model reveals that catalysts, which cannot adopt the optimal nonchelating conformation of benzylidene ligand, initiate through a high‐energy associative mechanism.     

FeIII in a low‐spin state in caesium bis[3‐ethoxysalicylaldehyde 4‐methylthiosemicarbazonato(2–)‐κ3O2,N1,S]ferrate(III) methanol monosolvate

The synthesis and crystal structure (at 100 K) of the title compound, Cs[Fe(C₁₁H₁₃N₃O₂S₂)₂]·CH₃OH, is reported. The asymmetric unit consists of an octahedral [Fe^III(L)₂]⁻ fragment, where L²⁻ is 3‐ethoxysalicylaldehyde 4‐methylthiosemicarbazonate(2−) {systematic name: [2‐(3‐ethoxy‐2‐oxidobenzylidene)hydrazin‐1‐ylidene](methylamino)methanethiolate}, a caesium cation and a methanol solvent molecule. Each L²⁻ ligand binds through the thiolate S, the imine N and the phenolate O atoms as donors, resulting in an Fe^IIIS₂N₂O₂ chromophore. The O,N,S‐coordinating ligands are orientated in two perpendicular planes, with the O and S atoms in cis positions and the N atoms in trans positions. The Fe^III cation is in the low‐spin state at 100 K.     

Gold‐Catalyzed Intermolecular Anti‐Markovnikov Hydroamination of Alkylidenecyclopropanes

The cationic gold phosphine complex [{PCy₂(o‐biphenyl)}Au(NCMe)]⁺SbF₆^? (Cy=cyclohexyl) catalyzes the intermolecular, anti‐Markovnikov hydroamination reaction of monosubstituted and cis‐ and trans‐disubstituted alkylidenecyclopropanes (ACPs) with imidazolidin‐2‐ones and other nucleophiles. This reaction forms 1‐cyclopropyl alkylamine derivatives in high yield and with high regio‐ and diastereoselectivity. NMR spectroscopic analysis of gold π‐ACP complexes and control experiments point to the sp hybridization of the ACP internal alkene carbon atom as controlling the regiochemistry of the ACP hydroamination reaction.     

Preparation and Characterization of Dinuclear Chromium(III) Complexes of a Hexadentate Tetraaza‐Dithiophenolate Ligand

The ability of the tetraaza‐dithiophenolate ligand H₂L² (H₂L² = N,N′‐Bis‐[2‐thio‐3‐aminomethyl‐5‐tert‐butyl‐benzyl]propane‐1,3‐diamine) to form dinuclear chromium(III) complexes has been examined. Reaction of Cr^IICl₂ with H₂L² in methanol in the presence of base followed by air‐oxidation afforded cis,cis‐[(L²)Cr^III₂(μ‐OH)(Cl)₂]⁺ ( 1a ) and trans,trans‐[(L²)Cr^III₂(μ‐OH)(Cl)₂]⁺ ( 1b ). Both compounds contain a confacial bioctahedral N₂ClCr^III(μ‐SR)₂(μ‐OH)Cr^IIIClN₂ core. The isomers differ in the mutual orientation of the coligands and the conformation of the supporting ligand. In 1a both Cl^? ligands are cis to the bridging OH function. In 1b they are in trans‐positions. Reaction of the hydroxo‐bridged complexes with HCl yielded the chloro‐bridged cations cis,cis‐[(L²)Cr^III₂(μ‐Cl)(Cl)₂]⁺ ( 2a ) and trans,trans‐[(L²)Cr^III₂(μ‐Cl)(Cl)₂]Cl ( 2b ), respectively. These bridge substitutions proceed with retention of the structures of the parent complexes 1a and 1b .     

Novel Octahedral Bis[2‐(1‐aziridinyl)ethanol‐κ2N,O] Complexes of Cobalt(II)

The synthesis and molecular structure of trans‐{bis[(acetato‐κO)‐(2‐(1‐aziridinyl)ethanol‐κ²N,O)]}cobalt(II) ( 4 ) and cis‐{bis[chlorido‐(2‐(1‐aziridinyl)ethanol‐κ²N,O)]}cobalt(II) ( 5 ) is reported. Both neutral chelate complexes are prepared from the corresponding Co^II salt [CoX₂; X = OAc ( 1 ), Cl ( 2 )] and 2‐(1‐aziridinyl)ethanol (azolH, 3 ) in dry dichloromethane. A third, ionic complex, cis‐{bis[aqua‐(2‐(1‐aziridinyl)ethanol‐κ²N,O)]}cobalt(II) diacetate ( 6 ) is formed from 4 in the presence of water and could be crystallized from aqueous dichloromethane. In all cases, 2‐(1‐aziridinyl)ethanol is coordinating as bidentate chelate ligand by the nitrogen and oxygen atom of the aziridinyl and hydroxy moiety. After purification, the compounds have been fully characterized using IR spectroscopy and FAB⁺‐MS. The single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis revealed a distorted octahedral geometry for all complexes with either trans ( 4 ) or cis ( 5 , 6 ) configuration.     

trans‐(2‐Acetylpyridine‐κ2N,O)dichlorobis(dimethyl sulfoxide‐κS)ruthenium(II)

In the title complex, [RuCl₂(C₇H₇NO)(C₂H₆OS)₂], the metal ion is at the centre of a distorted octahedral NOCl₂S₂ coordination sphere. The neutral 2‐acetyl­pyridine ligand binds to the metal ion through the pyridine N and carbonyl O atoms, forming a five‐membered chelate ring. The monodentate S‐coordinating di­methyl sulfoxide mol­ecules are mutually cis, and the two remaining positions in the coordination sphere are occupied by two mutually trans Cl^? ions.     

trans‐Dioxocyclam (1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecane‐2,9‐dione) dihydrate and its NiII complex

The crystal structures are reported of trans‐dioxocyclam dihydrate, C₁₀H₂₀N₄O₂·2H₂O, a structural isomer of the well known cis‐dioxocyclam, and of its novel Ni complex, (1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐2,9‐dionato‐κ⁴N)­nickel(II) dihydrate, [Ni(C₁₀H₁₈N₄O₂)]·2H₂O, the first example of a trans­ition metal complex of this ligand. Both mol­ecules lie on crystallographic centres of inversion. The free ligand has two of its N atoms turned outwards from the ring and hydrogen bonded to water mol­ecules. A major conformational change takes place in the complex in which the ligand binds in a trans tetradentate fashion, as suggested by the electronic spectrum. The nickel(II) ion is low spin, although the electronic spectrum of the complex in water indicates an equilibrium mixture of low‐spin and high‐spin species. The irreversible electrochemical oxidation of [NiL¹] (L¹ is deprotonated trans‐dioxocyclam, C₁₀H₁₈N₄O₂) in water occurs at a potential of 0.964 V [versus SHE (standard hydrogen electrode)], which is very similar to that for the Ni–cis‐dioxocyclam complex.     

Anion Effects on the Formation of Silver(I) Complexes with the Flexible Ligand 4,4′‐Bis(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐ylmethyl)biphenyl

The reaction of 4,4′‐bis(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐ylmethyl)biphenyl (btmb) with silver(I) salts of BF₄^–, NO₃^– and N₃^– led to the formation of four new silver(I) coordination polymers {[Ag(btmb)]BF₄}_n ( 1 ), {[Ag₂(btmb)₃](NO₃)₂(H₂O)₅}_n ( 2 ), [Ag₂(btmb)(N₃)₂]_n ( 3 ), and [Ag(btmb)(N₃)]_n ( 4 ). Their coordination number varies from 2 (in 1 ) to 3 (in 2 ), 4 (in 3 ), and 5 (in 4 ). Different from the single chain structure of 1 , complex 2 displays a 1D ladder‐like double chain framework, whereas complex 3 exhibits a 2D layered architecture. Complex 4 has the same anion as complex 3 but shows a different metal‐to‐ligand ratio and a 1D double‐zigzag chain structure. Both 3 and 4 have Ag ··· Ag argentophilic interactions. The ligand btmb adopts both cis or trans configuration in the studied complexes. A trans‐ or cis‐btmb ligand link silver ions with Ag ··· Ag distances of ≈?18 and 13 Å, respectively. BF₄^– and NO₃^– are non‐coordinating anions in 1 and 2 . N₃^– is the bridging anion in 3 (1,3‐bridging fashion) and 4 (1,1‐bridging fashion). These findings suggest that the coordination numbers around the Ag^I ion correlate to the coordination abilities of anions and the btmb to silver ratio. In addition, the influence of anions on thermal stability were also investigated. This work is a good example that nicely supports the less explored field of anion‐dependent structures of complexes with non‐pyridyl ligands.