Two Different Structural Motifs Observed for Dimeric Dialkylaluminum and Dialkylgallium Alkynides [R2E‐C≡C‐C6H5]2

The dialkylaluminum and dialkylgallium alkynides [R₂E‐C≡C‐R′]₂ (R = Me, CMe₃; E = Al, Ga; R′ = Ph) containing C≡C triple bonds attached to their central aluminum or gallium atoms are easily obtained by the reactions of dialkylelement chlorides with lithium alkynides or by treatment of the corresponding alkyne R‐C≡C‐H with dialkylaluminum or dialkylgallium hydrides. The first reaction is favored by the precipitation of LiCl, the second one by the formation of elemental hydrogen. All products form dimers in which the carbanionic carbon atoms of the alkynido groups adopt bridging positions, but, interestingly, different types of molecular structures were observed depending on the steric demand of the substituents terminally attached to the aluminum or gallium atoms. The small methyl substituents gave structures in which the aluminum or gallium atoms seemed to be side‐on coordinated by the C≡C triple bonds of almost linear E‐C≡C groups. In contrast, the more bulky tert‐butyl groups forced an arrangement in which the C≡C triple bonds were perpendicular to the E‐E axis of the molecules. Different bonding modes result, which were analyzed by quantum‐chemical calculations.     

New Ga/N‐based Active Lewis Pairs,Trifunctional Ga–Ga Compounds,Reactions with Cyanamide and Dual Insertion of Isocyanate

Hydrogallation of Me₃Si–C≡C–NR'₂ with R₂Ga–H (R = tBu, CH₂tBu, iBu) yielded Ga/N‐based active Lewis pairs, R₂Ga–C(SiMe₃)=C(H)–NR'₂ ( 7 ). The Ga and N atoms adopt cis‐positions at the C=C bonds and show weak Ga–N interactions. tBu₂GaH and Me₃Si–C≡C–N(C₂H₄)₂NMe afforded under exposure of daylight the trifunctional digallium(II) compound [MeN(C₂H₄)₂N](H)C=C(SiMe₃)Ga(tBu)–Ga(tBu)C(SiMe₃)=C(H)[N(C₂H₄)₂NMe] ( 8 ), which results from elimination of isobutene and H₂ and Ga–Ga bond formation. 8 was selectively obtained from the ynamine and [tBu(H)Ga–Ga(H)tBu]₂[HGatBu₂]₂. 7a (R = tBu; NR'₂ = 2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) and H₈C₄N–C≡N afforded the adduct tBu₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)(2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) · N≡C–NC₄H₈ ( 11 ) with the nitrile bound to gallium. The analogous ALP with harder Al atoms yielded an adduct of the nitrile dimer or oligomers of the nitrile at room temperature. The reaction of 7a with Ph–N=C=O led to the insertion of two NCO groups into the Ga–C_vinyl bond to yield a GaOCNCN heterocycle with Ga bound to O and N atoms ( 12 ).     

Synthese eines funktionalen Aluminiumalkinids,Me3C‐C≡C‐AlBr2, und dessen Reaktionen mit der sperrigen Lithiumverbindung LiCH(SiMe3)2

Synthesis of a Functional Aluminium Alkynide, Me₃C‐C≡C‐AlBr₂, and its Reactions with the Bulky Lithium Compound LiCH(SiMe₃)₂ Treatment of aluminium tribromide with the lithium alkynide (Li)C≡C‐CMe₃ afforded the aluminium alkynide Me₃C‐C≡C‐AlBr₂ ( 1 ) in an almost quantitative yield. 1 crystallizes with trimeric formula units possessing Al₃C₃ heterocycles and the anionic carbon atoms of the alkynido groups in the bridging positions. A dynamic equilibrium was determined in solution which probably comprises trimeric and dimeric formula units. Reaction of 1 with one equivalent of LiCH(SiMe₃)₂ yielded the compound [Me₃C‐C≡C‐Al(Br)‐CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 2 ), which is a dimer via Al‐C‐Al bridges. Two equivalents of the lithium compound gave a mixture of four main‐products, which could be identified as 2 , Li[Me₃C‐C≡C‐Al{CH(SiMe₃)₂}₃] ( 3 ), Me₃C‐C≡C‐Al[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 4 ), and Al[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₃. The lithium atom of 3 is coordinated by the C≡C triple bond and an inner carbon atom of one bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl group. Further interactions were observed to C‐H bonds of methyl groups.     

Substituent Effect on the Electronic Properties and Nature of the W≡C Bond in trans‐Cl(OC)(H3P)3W(≡C‐para‐C6H4X) (X = H,F, SiH3, CN,NO2, SiMe3, CMe3, NH2, NMe2) Complexes: A Computational Quantum Chemistry Study

In this investigation, we describe substituent effect on the dipole moment, ionization potential, electron affinity, structure, frontier orbitals energy, in the trans‐Cl(OC)(H₃P)₃W(≡C‐para‐C₆H₄X) (X = H, F, SiH₃, CN, NO₂, SiMe₃, CMe₃, NH₂, NMe₂) complexes using MPW1PW91 quantum chemical calculations. The nature of chemical bond between the [Cl(OC)(H₃P)₃W]⁻ and [C‐para‐C₆H₄X]⁺ fragments was illustrated with energy decomposition analysis (EDA). Percentage composition in terms of the defined groups of frontier orbitals for these complexes was inspected to investigate the character in metal–ligand bonds. Quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) was used for illustration of metal–ligand bonds in these complexes.     

Diversification of ortho‐Fused Cycloocta‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one Cores and Eight‐ to Six‐Ring Conversion by σ Bond C−C Cleavage

Sequential treatment of 2‐C₆H₄Br(CHO) with LiC≡CR¹ (R¹=SiMe₃, tBu), nBuLi, CuBr?SMe₂ and HC≡CCHClR² [R²=Ph, 4‐CF₃Ph, 3‐CNPh, 4‐(MeO₂C)Ph] at ?50 °C leads to formation of an intermediate carbanion (Z)‐1,2‐C₆H₄{C_A(=O)C≡C_BR¹}{CH=CH(CH^?)R²} ( 4 ). Low temperatures (?50 °C) favour attack at C_B leading to kinetic formation of 6,8‐bicycles containing non‐classical C‐carbanion enolates ( 5 ). Higher temperatures (?10 °C to ambient) and electron‐deficient R² favour retro σ‐bond C?C cleavage regenerating 4 , which subsequently closes on C_A providing 6,6‐bicyclic alkoxides ( 6 ). Computational modelling (CBS‐QB3) indicated that both pathways are viable and of similar energies. Reaction of 6 with H⁺ gave 1,2‐dihydronaphthalen‐1‐ols, or under dehydrating conditions, 2‐aryl‐1‐alkynylnaphthlenes. Enolates 5 react in situ with: H₂O, D₂O, I₂, allylbromide, S₂Me₂, CO₂ and lead to the expected C ‐E derivatives (E=H, D, I, allyl, SMe, CO₂H) in 49–64 % yield directly from intermediate 5 . The parents (E=H; R¹=SiMe₃, tBu; R²=Ph) are versatile starting materials for NaBH₄ and Grignard C=O additions, desilylation (when R¹=SiMe) and oxime formation. The latter allows formation of 6,9‐bicyclics via Beckmann rearrangement. The 6,8‐ring iodides are suitable Suzuki precursors for Pd‐catalysed C?C coupling (81–87 %), whereas the carboxylic acids readily form amides under T3P® conditions (71–95 %).     

The Analysis of Electronic Structures,NBO, EDA,and QTAIM of trans‐(H3P)2(η2‐BH4 )W(≡C‐para‐C6H4X)(CO) Complexes

In the present research, the impact of substitution on the dipole moment, electronic structure, and frontier orbital energy in trans ‐(H₃P )₂(η²‐BH₄ )W(≡C‐para ‐C₆H₄X )(CO ) complexes (X = H, F, SiH₃ , CN , NO₂ , SiMe₃ , CMe₃ , NH₂ , NMe₂ ) was studied with mpw1pw91 quantum chemical computations. The nature of the chemical bond between the trans‐[Cl(η²‐BH₄ )(H₃P ) ₂W ]⁻ and [C‐para ‐C₆H₄X ]⁺ fragments was demonstrated through energy decomposition analysis (EDA ). The percentage composition in terms of the specified groups of frontier orbitals was examined for these complexes to investigate the feature in metal–ligand bonds. Quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM ) and natural bond orbital (NBO ) analysis were applied to elucidate these complexes’ metal–ligand bonds.     

cis/trans Isomerism of Hydroalumination and Hydrogallation Products—Reflections on Stability and Rearrangement Mechanism

Treatment of (silylalkynyl)benzenes with (Me₃C)₂Ga? H afforded stable cis‐addition products, for example, (Me₃C)₂Ga? C(SiMe₃)?C(H)? C₆H₅ ( 1 ), while spontaneous cis/trans rearrangement was observed for sterically less shielded gallium hydrides. The corresponding trans‐di(tert‐butyl)gallium compounds ( 13 , 14 ) were obtained by the reaction of C₆H_6?n[C(H)?C(SiMe₃)GaCl₂]_n ( 11 , 12 ) with LiCMe₃. In contrast, spontaneous isomerization took place upon reaction of (Me₃C)₂Al? H with phenyltrimethylsilylethyne. In this case the cis isomer ( 17 ) was detected only at low temperature, while the trans product ( 18 ) formed quantitatively above 0 °C. Quantum‐chemical calculations showed that the trans forms are thermodynamically favored, essentially caused by a better mesomeric interaction of the C?C double bonds with the phenyl groups, a smaller steric stress in the molecules, and a short bonding contact of the coordinatively unsaturated Al or Ga atoms to C? H bonds of the aromatic rings. The rotation about the C?C double bonds follows a zwitterionic mechanism, and the relatively small rotational barrier is further lowered by an interaction to a Lewis acidic lithium cation.     

Alternative Synthesis and Structures of C‐monoacetylenic Phosphaalkenes

An alternative synthesis of C‐monoacetylenic phosphaalkenes trans‐Mes*P=C(Me)(C≡CR) (Mes* = 2, 4, 6‐^tBu₃Ph, R = Ph, SiMe₃) from C‐bromophosphaalkenes cis‐Mes*P=C(Me)Br using standard Sonogashira coupling conditions is described. Crystallographic studies confirm cis‐trans isomerization of the P=C double bond during Pd‐catalyzed cross coupling, leading exclusively to trans‐acetylenic phosphaalkenes. Crystallographic studies of all synthesized compounds reveal the extend of π‐conjugation over the acetylene and P=C π‐systems.     

Hydroalumination and Hydrogallation Reactions with Tri(ethynyl)silanes – Generation of Compounds with up to Three Coordinatively Unsaturated Aluminium Atoms

Hydroalumination or hydrogallation of tri(ethynyl)silanes, RSi(C≡C‐Ar)₃ ( 1a , R = Ph, Ar = Ph; 1b , R = Me, Ar = Ph; 1c , R = Me, Ar = C₆H₄Me), with the element hydrides H‐EtBu₂ (E = Al, Ga) in stoichiometric ratios of 1:1 to 1:3 at ambient temperature yielded the addition products (PhC≡C)₂(R)Si[(tBu₂E)C=C(H)Ph] ( 2 , R = Ph, E = Ga; 3a , R = Me, E = Al; 3b , R = Me, E = Ga), (PhC≡C)(Me)Si[(tBu₂E)C=C(H)Ph]₂ ( 4a , E = Al, 4b , E = Ga) and (Me)Si[(tBu₂Al)C=C(H)Ar]₃ ( 5 , Ar = Ph; 6 , Ar = C₆H₄Me). Compounds 2 – 4 show a relatively close interaction between the coordinatively unsaturated aluminium or gallium atoms and one of the C_α(≡C) atoms of unreacted alkyne substituents [245 (E = Al) and 266 pm (E = Ga)] that stabilises the kinetically favoured cis addition products with E and hydrogen on the same side of the resulting C=C double bonds. In the absence of these stabilising effects the compounds were found to isomerise to the thermodynamically favoured trans isomers.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Transition‐Metal Complexes Based on the 1,3,5‐Triethynyl Benzene Linking Unit

The synthesis of a unique series of heteromultinuclear transition metal compounds is reported. Complexes 1‐I‐3‐Br‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 4 ), 1‐Br‐3‐(bpy‐C≡C)‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 6 ), 1,3‐(bpy‐C≡C)₂‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 7 ), 1‐(XC≡C)‐3‐(bpy‐C≡C)‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 8 , X = SiMe₃; 9 , X = H), 1‐(HC≡C)‐3‐[(CO)₃ClRe(bpy‐C≡C)]‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 11 ), 1‐[(Ph₃P)AuC≡C]‐3‐[(CO)₃ClRe(bpy‐C≡C)]‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 13 ), 1‐[(Ph₃P)AuC≡C]‐3‐(bpy‐C≡C)‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 14 ), [1‐[(Ph₃PAuC≡C]‐3‐[{[Ti](C≡CSiMe₃)₂}Cu(bpy‐C≡C)]‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃]PF₆ ( 16 ), and [1,3‐[(tBu₂bpy)₂Ru(bpy‐C≡C)]₂‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃](PF₆)₄ ( 18 ) (Fc = (η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe, bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridiyl‐5‐yl, [Ti] = (η⁵‐C₅H₄SiMe₃)₂Ti) were prepared by using consecutive synthesis methodologies including metathesis, desilylation, dehydrohalogenation, and carbon–carbon cross‐coupling reactions. In these complexes the corresponding metal atoms are connected by carbon‐rich bridging units comprising 1,3‐diethynyl‐, 1,3,5‐triethynylbenzene and bipyridyl units. They were characterized by elemental analysis, IR and NMR spectroscopy, and partly by ESI‐TOF mass spectrometry., The structures of 4 and 11 in the solid state are reported. Both molecules are characterized by the central benzene core bridging the individual transition metal complex fragments. The corresponding acetylide entities are, as typical, found in a linear arrangement with representative M–C, C–C_C≡C and C≡C bond lengths.     

Die Reaktion des Digalliumsubiodids R(I)Ga‐Ga(I)R [R = C(SiMe3)3] mit Lithium‐diphenylphosphanid – radikalische Öffnung der Ga‐Ga‐Bindung

The Reaction of the Digallium Subiodide R(I)Ga‐Ga(I)R [R = C(SiMe₃)₃] with Lithium Diphenylphosphanide – Radical Cleavage of the Ga‐Ga Bond The easily available organoelement digallium(II) subiodide R(I)Ga‐Ga(I)R ( 1 ) [R = C(SiMe₃)₃] reacted with two equivalents of lithium diphenylphosphanide in toluene by the replacement of both iodine atoms by two phosphanido groups. The product, [R(H)Ga‐P(C₆H₅)₂]₂ ( 2 ), contains a four‐membered Ga₂P₂ heterocycle without direct Ga‐Ga bonding interactions and the gallium atoms exclusively in an oxidation state of +III. They are attached to hydrogen atoms, which may result from a reaction of a reactive intermediate with the solvent.     

Cobalt(II)-organische Phosphaniminato-Komplexe mit Heterocuban-Struktur. Kristallstrukturen von [CoBr(NPR3)]4 mit R = Me,Et, [Co(C≡C–CMe3)(NPMe3)]4 und [Co(C≡C–SiMe3)(NPEt3)]4

Organo-Cobalt(II) Phosphorane Iminato Complexes with Heterocubane Structures. Crystal Structures of [CoBr(NPR₃)]₄ with R = Me, Et, [Co(C≡C–CMe₃)(NPMe₃)]₄, and [Co(C≡C–SiMe₃)(NPEt₃)]₄ The phosphorane iminato complexes [CoBr(NPR₃)]₄, which are accessible by reaction of CoBr₂ with the silylated phosphorane imines Me₃SiNPR₃ (R = Me, Et) in the melt at 180 °C and in the presence of KF, can be transformed into the alkynyl complexes [Co(C≡C–CMe₃) · (NPMe₃)]₄ and [Co(C≡C–SiMe₃)(NPEt₃)]₄ on obtaining the heterocubane structures, when caused to react with the lithium organic reagents LiC≡C–CMe₃ and LiC≡C–SiMe₃ in THF at 0 °C. According to the crystal structure analyses all four of the compounds form heterocubane structures with only slightly distorted Co₄N₄ cubic structures.     

A 1‐Aza‐2‐silacyclobut‐3‐ene and an Alkyne from [Li{Si(SiMe3)3}(thf)3] and the Isocyanide 2,6‐Me2C6H3NC

The novel zwitterionic heterocycle 1 was unexpectedly obtained from the reaction between [Li(SiR₃)(thf)₃] and ArNC. Upon heating 1 underwent an interesting ring opening to give the alkyne 2 . Hence the C≡C bond effectively arises from the C−C coupling of two ArNC moieties. R=SiMe₃, Ar=2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃, tmeda=N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine.     

1,4‐Di(isopropyl)‐1,4‐diazabutadien als Abfangreagenz für monomere Bruchstücke des Tetragalliumclusters Ga4[C(SiMe3)3]4 – Bildung eines ungesättigten GaN2C2‐Heterocyclus und eines Oxidationsprodukts mit Ga‐O‐O‐Ga‐Gruppe

1,4‐Di(isopropyl)‐1,4‐diazabutadiene as a Reagent for the Trapping of Monomeric Fragments of the Tetragalliumcluster Ga₄[C(SiMe₃)₃]₄ – Formation of an Unsaturated GaN₂C₂ Heterocycle and an Oxidation Product Containing a Ga‐O‐O‐Ga Group The tetrahedral tetragallium cluster Ga₄[C(SiMe₃)₃]₄ ( 1 ) dissociates upon dissolution to yield the monomeric fragments Ga‐R [R = C(SiMe₃)₃]. These monomers could be trapped now by the treatment of their solutions with 1,4‐di(isopropyl)‐1,4‐diazabutadiene. The product of the cycloaddition reaction ( 2 ) possesses a five‐membered GaN₂C₂ heterocycle with a coordinatively unsaturated gallium atom and an endocyclic C=C double bond. 2 is rather sensitive towards oxidation by traces of air. The contact with oxygen yielded a digallium peroxide [(C₂N₂iPr₂)RGa‐O‐O‐GaR(C₂N₂iPr₂)] ( 3 ) which was isolated in a very low yield only and which has a gallium atom attached to each oxygen atom of the inner peroxo group. Both chelating ligands of 3 possess an unpaired electron.     

Organo‐Palladium(II)‐Verbindungen mit PdC4‐Koordination: Phenylethinyl‐ und Methylphenylethinylkomplexe

Tetrakis(p‐tolyl)oxalamidinato‐bis[acetylacetonatopalladium(II)] ([Pd₂(acac)₂(oxam)]) reacted with Li–C≡C–C₆H₅ in THF with formation of [Pd(C≡C–C₆H₅)₄Li₂(thf)₄] ( 1a ). Reaction of [Pd₂(acac)₂(oxam)] with a mixture of 6 equiv. Li–C≡C–C₆H₅ and 2 equiv. LiCH₃ resulted in the formation of [Pd(CH₃)(C≡C–C₆H₅)₃Li₂(thf)₄] ( 2 ), and the dimeric complex [Pd₂(CH₃)₄(C≡C–C₆H₅)₄Li₄(thf)₆] ( 3 ) was isolated upon reaction of [Pd₂(acac)₂(oxam)] with a mixture of 4 equiv. Li–C≡C–C₆H₅ and 4 equiv. LiCH₃. 1 – 3 are extremely reactive compounds, which were isolated as white needles in good yields (60–90%). They were fully characterized by IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, ⁷Li‐NMR spectroscopy, and by X‐ray crystallography of single crystals. In these compounds Li ions are bonded to the two carbon atoms of the alkinyl ligand. 1a reacted with Pd(PPh₃)₄ in the presence of oxygen to form the already known complexes trans‐[Pd(C≡C–C₆H₅)₂(PPh₃)₂] and [Pd(η²‐O₂)(PPh₃)₂]. In addition, 1a is an active catalyst for the Heck coupling reaction, but less active in the catalytic Sonogashira reaction.     

2,2‐Difluor‐1,3‐diaza‐2‐sila‐cyclopenten – Synthese und Reaktionen

2,2‐Difluor‐1,3‐diaza‐2‐sila‐cyclopentene – Synthesis and Reactions N,N′‐Di‐tert‐butyl‐1,4‐diaza‐1,3‐butadiene reacts with elemental lithium under reduction to give a dilithium salt, which forms with fluorosilanes the diazasilacyclopentenes 1 – 4 ; (HCNCMe₃)₂SiFR, R = F ( 1 ), Me ( 2 ), Me₃C ( 3 ), N(CMe₃)SiMe₃ ( 4 ). As by‐product in the synthesis of 1 , the tert‐butyl‐amino‐methylene‐tert‐butyliminomethine substituted compound 5 was isolated, R = N(CMe₃)‐CH₂‐CH = NCMe₃. 5 is formed in the reaction of 1 with the monolithium salt of the 1,4‐diaza‐1,3‐butadiene in an enamine‐imine‐tautomerism. 1 reacts with lithium amides to give (HCNCMe₃)₂SiFNHR, 6 – 12 , R = H ( 6 ), Me ( 7 ), Me₂CH ( 8 ), Me₃C ( 9 ), H₅C₆ ( 10 ), 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 11 ), 2,6‐(Me₂CH)₂C₆H₃ ( 12 ). The reaction of 12 with LiNH‐2.6‐(Me₂CH)₂C₆H₃ leads to the formation of (HCNCMe₃)₂Si(NHR)₂, ( 13 ). In the presence of n‐BuLi, 12 forms a lithium salt which looses LiF in boiling toluene. Lithiated 12 adds this LiF and generates a spirocyclic tetramer with a central eight‐membered LiF‐ring ( 14 ), [(HCNCMe₃)₂Si(FLiFLiNR)]₄, R = 2,6‐(Me₂CH)₂C₆H₃. ClSiMe₃ reacts with lithiated 12 to yield the substitution product (HCNCMe₃)₂SiFN(SiMe₃) R, ( 15 ). The crystal structures of 1 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 11 , 13 , 14 are reported.     

2,4‐Disila‐1,3,5‐oxadiazin,Cyclodisilazan‐Carbonsäure‐silylamid und ‐silylester

The lithium salts of the Me₃Si‐ as well as Me₃Si‐ and Me₂SiF‐substituted Cyclotrisilazanes I and II react with tert‐butylacylchloride under ring contraction and formation of the cyclodisilazane‐silylester, Me₃SiN(SiMe₂–N)₂SiMe₂–O–CO–CMe₃ ( 1 ). The lithium salt of the fluorodi‐methylsilyl‐substituted cyclotrisilazan III forms with benzoylchloride primarily in the analogous reaction the carboxy‐silyl‐amide, Me₂SiF(N–SiMe₂)₂SiMe₂–NH–CO–C₆H₅⁺ ( 2 ), which can be converted with III and benzoylchloride into the cyclodisilazane‐silylester, Me₂SiF(NSiMe₂)₂SiMe₂–O–CO–C₆H₅, ( 3 ). A silylester substituted six‐membered disila‐oxadiazine ( 4 ) is the result of the reaction of the lithiated cyclotrisilazane, (Me₂SiNH)₂, (Me₂SiNLi) with tert‐butyl‐acylchloride. The reaction includes anionic ring contraction and can be rationilized by a process analogous to keto‐enol‐tautomerism. Dilithiated octamethyl‐cyclotetrasilazane, (Me₂SiNHMe₂SiNLi)₂, reacts with tert‐butyl‐acylchloride or benzoylchloride in a molar ratio 1:2 to yield symmetrically acylestersubstituted cyclodisilazanes, (RCO–O–SiMe₂–NSiMe₂)₂, R = C₆H₅ ( 5 ), CMe₃ ( 6 ). The reaction mechanisms are discussed and the crystal structures of 2 and 6 are reported.     

Generation and Reactivity of {(Ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis[diisopropylphosphine‐κP]}‐{[2,4,6‐tri(tert‐butyl)phenyl]phosphino‐κP}rhodium ([Rh{PH(tBu3C6H2)}(iPr2PCH2CH2PiPr2)]): Catalytic C−P Bond Formation via Intramolecular C−H/P−H Dehydrogenative Cross‐Coupling

The complex [Rh(η³‐benzyl)(dippe)] ( 1 ; dippe=bis(diisopropylphosphino)ethane=(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis[diisopropylphosphine]) reacted cleanly with Mes*PH₂ ( 2 ; Mes*=2,4,6‐^tBu₃C₆H₂) to provide a new Rh species [Rh(H)(dippe)(L)] ( 3 ), L being the 2,3‐dihydro‐3,3‐dimethyl‐1H‐phosphindole ligand 4 (=^tBu₂C₆H₂(CMe₂CH₂PH)) (Scheme 1). Complex 3 was converted to the corresponding chloride [Rh(Cl)(dippe)(L)] ( 6 ) when treated with CH₂Cl₂, whereas the dimeric species [Rh₂{μ‐^tBu₂C₆H₂(CMe₂CH₂P)}(μ‐H)(dippe)₂] ( 7 ) was formed upon thermolysis in toluene (Scheme 2). The structures of 6 and 7 ⋅C₇H₈ were determined by X‐ray crystallography. Complexes 1 and 3 served as catalyst precursors for the dehydrogenative coupling of C−H and P−H bonds in the conversion of 2 to 4 (Scheme 3). Deuteration studies with Mes*PD₂ exposed a complex series of bond‐activation pathways that appear to involve C−H activation of the dippe ligand by the Rh‐atom (Schemes 4 and 5)     

1,2‐Diaza‐3‐silacyclopent‐5‐ene – Synthese und Reaktionen

1,2‐Diaza‐3‐silacyclopent‐5‐ene – Synthesis and Reactions The dilithium salt of bis(tert‐butyl‐trimethylsilylmethylen)ketazine ( 1 ) forms an imine‐enamine salt. 1 reacts with halosilanes in a molar ratio of 1:1 to give 1,2‐diaza‐3‐silacyclopent‐5‐enes. Me₃SiCH=CCMe₃ [N(SiR,R′)‐N=C‐C]HSiMe₃ ( 2 ‐ 7 ). ( 2 : R,R′ = Cl; 3 : R = CH₃, R′ = Ph; 4 : R = F, R′ = CMe₃; 5 : R = F, R′ = Ph; 6 : R = F, R′ = N(SiMe₃)₂; 7 : R = F, R′ = N(CMe₃)SiMe₃). In the reaction of 1 with tetrafluorosilane the spirocyclus 8 is isolated. The five‐membered ring compounds 2 ‐ 7 and compound 9 substituted on the silicon‐fluoro‐ and (tert‐butyltrimethylsilyl) are acid at the C(4)‐atom and therefore can be lithiated. Experiments to prepare lithium salts of 4 with MeLi, n‐BuLi and PhLi gave LiF and the substitution‐products 10 ‐ 12 . 9 forms a lithium salt which reacts with ClSiMe₃ to give LiCl and the SiMe₃ ring system ( 13 ) substituted at the C(4)‐atom. The ring compounds 3 ‐ 7 and 10 ‐ 12 form isomers, the formation is discussed. Results of the crystal structure and analyses of 8 , 10 , 12 , and 13 are presented.