Benzo[a]heptalenes from Heptaleno[1,2‐c]furans. Part I

It is shown that heptaleno[1,2‐c]furans 1 , which are available in two steps from heptalene‐4,5‐dicarboxylates by reduction and oxidative dehydrogenation of the corresponding vicinal dimethanols 2 with MnO₂ or IBX (Scheme 4), react thermally in a Diels–Alder‐type [4+2] cycloaddition at the furan ring with a number of electron‐deficient dipolarophiles to yield the corresponding 1,4‐epoxybenzo[d]heptalenes (cf. Schemes 6, 15, 17, and 19). The thermal reaction between dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (ADM) and 1 leads, kinetically controlled, via a sterically less‐congested transition state (Fig. 4) to the formation of the (M*)‐configured 1,4‐dihydro‐1,4‐epoxybenzo[a]heptalenes, which undergo a cyclic double‐bond shift to the energetically more‐relaxed benzo[d]heptalenes 4 (Schemes 6 and 7). Most of the latter ones exhibit under thermal conditions epimerization at the axis of chirality, so that the (M*)‐ and (P*)‐stereoisomers are found in reaction mixtures. The (P*)‐configured forms of 4 are favored in thermal equilibration experiments, in agreement with AM1 calculations (Table 1). The relative (P*,1S*,4R*)‐ and (M*,1S*,4R*)‐configuration of the crystalline main stereoisomers of the benzo[d]heptalene‐2,3‐dicarboxylates 4a and 4f , respectively, was unequivocally established by an X‐ray crystal‐structure determination (Figs. 1 and 2). Acid‐induced rearrangement of 4 led to the formation of the corresponding 4‐hydroxybenzo[a]heptalene‐2,3‐dicarboxylates 5 in moderate‐to‐good yields (Schemes 8, 13, and 14). When the aromatization reaction is performed in the presence of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), trifluoroacetates of type 6 and 13 (Schemes 8, 12, and 13) are also formed via deprotonation of the intermediate tropylium ions of type 7 (Scheme 11). Thermal reaction of 1 with dimethyl maleate gave the 2,3‐exo‐ and 2,3‐endo‐configured dicarboxylates 14 as mixtures of their (P*)‐ and (M*)‐epimers (Scheme 15). Treatment of these forms with lithium di(isopropyl)amide (LDA) at ?70° gave the expected benzo[a]heptalene‐2,3‐dicarboxylates 15 in good yields (Scheme 16). Fumaronitrile reacted thermally also with 1 to the corresponding 2‐exo,3‐endo‐ and 2‐endo,3‐exo‐configured adducts 17 , again as mixtures of their (P*)‐ and (M*)‐epimers (Scheme 17), which smoothly rearranged on heating in dimethoxyethane (DME) in the presence of Cs₂CO₃ to the benzo[a]heptalene‐2,3‐dicarbonitriles 18 (Scheme 18). Some cursory experiments demonstrated that hex‐3‐yne‐2,5‐dione and (E)/(Z)‐hexa‐3‐ene‐2,5‐dione undergo also the Diels–Alder‐type cycloaddition reaction with 1 (Scheme 19). The mixtures of the stereoisomers of the 2,3‐diacetyl‐1,4‐epoxytetrahydrobenzo[d]heptalenes 22 gave, on treatment with Cs₂CO₃ in DME at 80°, only mixtures of the regioisomeric inner aldol products 24 and 25 of the intermediately formed benzo[a]heptalenes 23 (Scheme 20).     

Alkylation Reactions at the Benzo Moiety of 2,4‐Dimethoxy‐3‐(phenylsulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalenes – Model Compounds of Colchicinoids

Alkylation reactions of 3‐(X‐sulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols (X=Ph, morpholin‐4‐yl) and their dimethyl ethers were studied. The diols form with K₂CO₃/MeI in aqueous media the 1‐methylated benzoheptalenes, but in yields not surpassing 20% (Table 1). On the other hand, 2,4‐dimethoxybenzo[a]heptalenes can easily be lithiated at C(3) with BuLi and then treated with alkyl iodides to give the 3‐alkylated forms in good yield (Table 2). Surprising is the reaction with two equiv. or more of t‐BuLi since the alkylation at C(4) is accompanied by the reductive elimination of the X‐sulfonyl group at C(3) (Table 3). Most exciting is also the course of 2,4‐dimethoxy‐3‐(phenylsulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalenes in the presence of an excess of MeLi. After the expected exchange of MeO against Me at C(4) (Scheme 6), rearrangement takes place under formation of 4‐benzyl‐2‐methoxybenzo[a]heptalenes and concomitant loss of the sulfonyl group at C(3) (Table 4). In the case of X=morpholin‐4‐yl, rearrangement cannot occur. However, the intermediate benzyl anions of Type E (Scheme 8) react easily with O₂ of the air to build up corresponding benzo[a]heptalene‐4‐methanols (Table 6).     

On the Formation of 2‐Sulfonylbenzo[a]heptalene‐1,3‐diols as Precursors for the Synthesis of Colchicinoids

The benzo[a]heptalene formation from 4‐[(R‐sulfonyl)acetyl]heptalene‐5‐carboxylates 15 and 5‐[(R‐sulfonyl)acetyl]heptalene‐4‐carboxylates 16 (R=Ph or morpholino) in the presence of R′SO₂CH₂Li and BuLi has been investigated (Scheme 6). Only the sulfonyl moiety linked to the C?O group at C(4) of the heptalene skeleton is found at C(3) of the formed benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols 3 in accordance with the general mechanism of their formation (Scheme 3). Intermediates that might rearrange to corresponding 2‐sulfonylbenzo[a]heptalene‐1,3‐diols lose HO^? under the reaction conditions to yield the corresponding cyclopenta[d]heptalenones of type 11 (Schemes 6 and 7). However, the presence of an additional Me group at C(α) of the lithioalkyl sulfones suppresses the loss of HO^?, and 4‐methyl‐2‐sulfonylbenzo[a]heptalene‐1,3‐diols of type 4c have been isolated and characterized for the first time (Schemes 8 and 10). A number of X‐ray crystal‐structure analyses of starting materials and of the new benzo[a]heptalenes have been performed. Finally, benzo[a]heptalene 4c has been transformed into its 1,2,3‐trimethoxy derivative 23 , a benzo[a]heptalene with the colchicinoid substitution pattern at ring A (Scheme 11).     

Reductive Elimination of Phenylsulfonyl Groups in the 3‐Position of Benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols

3‐(Phenylsulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols 1 can be desulfonylated with an excess of LiAlH₄/MeLi?LiBr in boiling THF in good yields (Scheme 6). When the reaction is run with LiAlH₄/MeLi, mainly the 3,3′‐disulfides 6 of the corresponding 2,4‐dihydroxybenzo[a]heptalene‐3‐thiols are formed after workup (Scheme 7). However, the best yields of desulfonylated products are obtained when the 2,4‐dimethoxy‐substituted benzo[a]heptalenes 2 are reduced with an excess of LiAlH₄/TiCl₄ at ?78→20° in THF (Scheme 10). Attempts to substitute the PhSO₂ group of 2 with freshly prepared MeONa in boiling THF led to a highly selective ether cleavage of the 4‐MeO group, rather than to desulfonylation (Scheme 13).     

From Colchicine and Some of Its Derivatives to 1,2,3,9,10-Pentamethoxybenzo[a]heptalenes

A two-step synthesis of 4-methylcolchicine ( 13 ), starting from colchicine ( 2 ), has been developed (Scheme 5). In three steps, 4-ethylcolchicine ( 28 ) is also accessible from 2 (Scheme 8). Colchicine ( 2 ) and its derivatives 13 and 28 have been transformed into the benzo[a]heptalene derivatives 9 , 18 , and 34 , respectively, by Hofmann degradation of the corresponding deacetylcolchiceine 3, 19 , and 29 , respectively, followed by methylation of the two O-functions first with diazomethane and then with trimethoxonium tetrafluoroborate (Scheme 2 and 6). The thus formed tropylium salts gave, on deprotonation with Me₃N in CHCl₃, the expected pentamethoxybenzo[a]heptalenes 9, 18 , and 34 , respectively. X-Ray crystal-structure analysis of 9 (Fig.3) and 18 (Fig. 7), determination of the vicinal coupling constants of the H-atoms at the heptalene skeleton as well as the measurement of the racemization rate of the new benzo[a]heptalenes revealed a marked influence of the substituent at C(4) on the degree of twisting of the heptalene skeleton. The absolute configuration of the resolved heptalenes was deduced from their long-wavelength CD maxima around 350 nm. The heptalenes with a negative maximum in this range possess (7aP)-configuration.     

Studies for a Variable Synthesis of Colchicinoids: Construction of Ring A on a Heptalene Moiety

It is shown that heptalene‐4,5‐dicarboxylates 2 , which react with lithiated methyl sulfones mainly in a Michael fashion at C(3) (cf. Scheme 2), so that the formation of 3‐sulfonylbenzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols 5 is repressed or completely suppressed, can be transformed into corresponding pseudo‐esters 15 (Scheme 4). These pseudo‐esters, on treatment with lithiated methyl sulfones, followed by addition of BuLi, furnish the 3‐sulfonylbenzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols 5 in excellent‐to‐moderate yields without formation of Michael adducts or their follow‐up products (cf. Scheme 5 and 6). The reaction of the pseudo‐ester 15a with Li[¹³C]H₂SO₂Ph, followed by treatment with non‐labeled LiCH₂SO₂Ph and then BuLi, led to the exclusive formation of 3‐(phenylsulfonyl)‐[1‐¹³C]benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diol 5a* (Scheme 9). This experiment demonstrates that the (phenylsulfonyl)acetyl groups at C(4) and C(5) of the heptalene core retain their individual positions in the course of the benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diol formation. These findings are only compatible with an intramolecular rearrangement mechanism as depicted in Scheme 10.     

Formation of 6‐Methyl‐7,11‐diphenylheptaleno[1,2‐c]furanones

The dehydrogenation reaction of a mixture of heptalene‐1,2‐ and heptalene‐4,5‐dimethanols 4a and 4b with basic MnO₂ in AcOEt at room temperature led to the formation of the corresponding heptaleno[1,2‐c]furan‐1‐one 6a and heptaleno[1,2‐c]furan‐3‐one 7a (Scheme 2). Both products can be isolated by chromatography on silica gel. The methylenation of the furan‐3‐one 7a with 1 mol‐equiv. of Tebbe's reagent at ?25 to ?30° afforded the 2‐isopropenyl‐5‐methylheptalene‐1‐methanol 9a , instead of the expected 3,6‐dimethylheptaleno[1,2‐c]furan 8 (Scheme 3). Also, the treatment of 7a with Takai's reagent did not lead to the formation of 8 . On standing in solution at room temperature, or more rapidly on heating at 60°, heptalene 9a undergoes a reversible double‐bond shift (DBS) to 9b with an equilibrium ratio of 1 : 1.     

Synthesis of Benzo[a]heptalene

Benzo[a]heptalene has been synthesized by two different approaches. The first one follows a pathway to hexahydrobenzo[a]heptalenone 19a that has been already described by Wenkert and Kim(Scheme). Indeed, 19a was obtained in a mixture with its double-bond-shifted isomer 19b . Reduction of this mixture to the corresponding secondary alcohols 26a/26b and elimination of H₂O lead to a mixture of the tetrahydrobenzo[a]heptalenes 23a-d (Scheme7 and 8). Reaction of 23a-d with 2 equiv. of triphenylmethylium tetrafluoroborate in boiling CHCl₃, followed by treatment with Me₃N in CH₂Cl₂, generated directly 2 , unfortunately in a mixture with Ph₃CH that could not be separated from 2 (Scheme 10 and 11). The second approach via dimethyl benzo[a]heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylate ( 30 ) (Scheme 12) that was gradually transformed into the corresponding carbaldehydes 37 and 43 (Scheme 14) both of which, on treatment with the Wilkinson catalyst [RhCl(PPh₃)₃] at 130° in toluene, smoothly decarbonylated, finally gave pure 2 as an unstable orange, viscous oil. UV/VIS, NMR, and mass spectra of 2 are discussed in detail (cf. Chapt.3).     

A ‘One-Pot’ Anellation Method for the Transformation of Heptalene-4,5-dicarboxylates into Benzo[a]heptalenes

It has been found that dimethyl heptalene-4,5-dicarboxylates, when treated with 4 mol-equiv. of lithiated N,N-dialkylamino methyl sulfones or methyl phenyl sulfone, followed by 4 mol-equiv. of BuLi in THF in the temperature range of ?78 to 20°, give rise to the formation of 3-[(N,N-dialkylamino)sulfonyl]- or 3-(phenylsul-fonyl)benzo[a]heptalene-2,4-diols of. (cf. Scheme 4, and Tables 2 and 3). Accompanying products are 2,4-bis{[(N,N-dialkylamino)sulfonyl]methyl}- or 2,4-bis[(phenylsulfonyl)methyl]-4,10a-dihydro-3H-heptaleno[1,10-bc]furan-3-carboxylates as mixtures of diastereoisomers of. cf. Scheme 4, and (Tables 2 and 3) which are the result of a Michael addition reaction of the lithiated methyl sulfones at C(3) of the heptalene-4,5-dicarboxylates, followed by (sulfonyl)methylation of the methoxycarbonyl group at C(5) and cyclization of. (cf. Scheme 5). It is assumed that the benzo[a]heptalene formation is due to (sulfonyl)methylation of both methoxycarbonyl groups of the heptalene-4,5-dicarboxylates of. (cf. Schemes 6 and 8). The resulting bis-enolates 35 are deprotonated further. The thus formed tris-anions 36 can then cyclize to corresponding tris-anions 37 of cyclopenta[d]heptalenes which, after loss of N,N-dialkylamido sulfite or phenyl sulfinate, undergo a ring-enlargement reaction by 1,2-C migration finally leading to the observed benzo[a]heptalenes of. (cf. Schemes 8 and 9). The structures of the new product types have been finally established by X-ray crystal-structure analyses (cf. Figs. 1 and 2 as well as Exper. Part).     

Nanomagnetically modified thioglycolic acid (γ‐Fe2O3@SiO2‐SCH2CO2H): Efficient and reusable green catalyst for the one‐pot domino synthesis of spiro[benzo[a]benzo[6,7]chromeno[2,3‐c]phenazine] and benzo[a]benzo[6,7]chromeno[2,3‐c]phenazines

Superparamagnetic nanoparticles of modified thioglycolic acid (γ‐Fe₂O₃@SiO₂‐SCH₂CO₂H) represent a new, efficient and green catalyst for the one‐pot synthesis of novel spiro[benzo[a ]benzo[6,7]chromeno[2,3‐c ]phenazine] derivatives via domino Knoevenagel–Michael–cyclization reaction of 2‐hydroxynaphthalene‐1,4‐dione, benzene‐1,2‐diamines, ninhydrin and isatin. This novel magnetic organocatalyst was easily isolated from the reaction mixture by magnetic decantation using an external magnet and reused at least six times without significant loss in its activity. The catalyst was fully characterized using various techniques. This procedure was also applied successfully for the synthesis of benzo[a ]benzo[6,7]chromeno[2,3‐c ]phenazines.     

Synthesis of Benzo[a]heptalenes via Benzanellation–Aromatization Sequence

A novel approach towards the synthesis of functionalized benzo[a]heptalenes 9 and 10 via a 6π‐electrocyclic ring closure – aromatization sequence of corresponding bis[prop‐2‐enoates] 5 and 6 has been developed (Scheme 1). The starting bis[prop‐2‐enoates] have been prepared from the corresponding dialdehydes 3a and 4a in a Wittig‐Horner reaction, and their UV/VIS properties have also been investigated (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The dehydrogenations of the corresponding diols 1 and 2 to dialdehydes with a number of oxidizing reagents, including MnO₂ in CH₂Cl₂, tetrapropylammonium perruthenate (TPAP), and activated DMSO, have been studied in detail.     

Formation of Heptaleno[1,2-c]furans and Heptaleno[1,2-c]furanones

The dehydrogenation reaction of the heptalene-4,5-dimethanols 4a and 4d , which do not undergo the double-bond-shift (DBS) process at ambient temperature, with basic MnO₂ in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature, leads to the formation of the corresponding heptaleno[1,2-c]furans 6a and 6d , respectively, as well as to the corresponding heptaleno[1,2-c]furan-3-ones 7a and 7d , respectively (cf. Scheme 2 and 8). The formation of both product types necessarily involves a DBS process (cf. Scheme 7). The dehydrogenation reaction of the DBS isomer of 4a , i.e., 5a , with MnO₂ in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature results, in addition to 6a and 7a , in the formation of the heptaleno[1,2-c]-furan-1-one 8a and, in small amounts, of the heptalene-4,5-dicarbaldehyde 9a (cf. Scheme 3). The benzo[a]heptalene-6,7-dimethanol 4c with a fixed position of the C?C bonds of the heptalene skeleton, on dehydrogenation with MnO₂ in CH₂Cl₂, gives only the corresponding furanone 11b (Scheme 4). By [²H₂]-labelling of the methanol function at C(7), it could be shown that the furanone formation takes place at the stage of the corresponding lactol [3-²H₂]- 15b (cf. Scheme 6). Heptalene-1,2-dimethanols 4c and 4e , which are, at room temperature, in thermal equilibrium with their corresponding DBS forms 5c and 5e , respectively, are dehydrogenated by MnO₂ in CH₂Cl₂ to give the corresponding heptaleno[1,2-c]furans 6c and 6e as well as the heptaleno[1,2-c]furan-3-ones 7c and 7e and, again, in small amounts, the heptaleno[1,2-c]furan-1-ones 8c and 8e , respectively (cf. Scheme 8). Therefore, it seems that the heptalene-1,2-dimethanols are responsible for the formation of the furan-1-ones (cf. Scheme 7). The methylenation of the furan-3-ones 7a and 7e with Tebbe's reagent leads to the formation of the 3-methyl-substituted heptaleno[1,2-c]furans 23a and 23e , respectively (cf. Scheme 9). The heptaleno[1,2-c]furans 6a, 6d , and 23a can be resolved into their antipodes on a Chiralcel OD column. The (P)-configuration is assigned to the heptaleno[1,2-c]furans showing a negative Cotton effect at ca. 320 nm in the CD spectrum in hexane (cf. Figs. 3–5 as well as Table 7). The (P)-configuration of (–)- 6a is correlated with the established (P)-configuration of the dimethanol (–)- 5a via dehydrogenation with MnO₂. The degree of twisting of the heptalene skeleton of 6 and 23 is determined by the Me-substitution pattern (cf. Table 9). The larger the heptalene gauche torsion angles are, the more hypsochromically shifted is the heptalene absorption band above 300 nm (cf. Table 7 and 8, as well as Figs. 6–9).     

Formation of 3-Sulfonyl-Substituted Benzo[a]heptalene-2,4-diols from Heptalene-1,2-dicarboxylates and Lithiomethyl Phenyl Sulfones

On treatment with 6 mol-equiv. of lithiomethyl phenyl sulfone at −78° in THF, dimethyl 5,6,8,10-tetramethylheptalene-1,2-dicarboxylate ( 1′b ) gives, after raising the temperature to −10° and addition of 6 mol-equiv. of BuLi, followed by further warming to ambient temperature, the corresponding 3-(phenylsulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalene-2,4-diol 2b in yields up to 65% (cf. Scheme 6 and Table 2), in contrast to its double-bond-shifted (DBS) isomer 1b which gave 2b in a yield of only 6% [1]. The bisanion [ 9 ]²⁻ of the cyclopenta[a]heptalen-1(1H)-one 9 (cf. Fig. 1), carrying a (phenylsulfonyl)methyl substituent at C(11b), seems to be a key intermediate on the reaction path to 2b , because 9 is transformed in high yield into 2b in the presence of 6 mol-equiv. of BuLi in the temperature range of −10° to room temperature (cf. Scheme 7). Heptalene-dicarboxylate 1′b was also transformed into benzo[a]heptalene-2,4-diols 2c – g by a number of lithiated methyl X-phenyl sulfones and BuLi (cf. Scheme 9 and Table 3).     

Benzo[a]azulenediones and 10,10′‐Bibenzo[a]azulene

The oxidation of benzo[a]azulene ( 4 ) with commercial MnO₂ in dioxane/H₂O leads to a number of products in low yield (Table 1). Treatment of 4 with ‘mild’ MnO₂ (MnO₂/C) in dioxane/5% H₂O results in the formation of 10,10′‐bibenzo[a]azulene ( 18 ) in yields of up to 59% of isolated and purified material. Compound 18 exhibits atropisomerism and can be separated by HPLC on a Chiralcel column at room temperature into its stable antipodes (Fig.).     

A New Alkylation Method for Heptalene‐4,5‐dicarboxylates and of One of Their Pseudoester Forms

Dimethyl heptalene‐4,5‐dicarboxylates

1 The locants of heptalene itself are maintained throughout the whole work. See footnote 4 in [1] for reasoning.

undergo preferentially a Michael addition reaction at C(3) with α‐lithiated alkyl phenyl sulfones at temperatures below ?50°, leading to corresponding cis‐configured 3,4‐dihydroheptalene‐4,5‐dicarboxylates (cf. Table 1, Schemes 3 and 4). The corresponding heptalenofuran‐1‐one‐type pseudoesters of dimethyl heptalene‐4,5‐dicarboxylates (Scheme 5) react with [(phenylsulfonyl)methyl]lithium almost exclusively at C(1) of the furanone group (Scheme 6). In contrast to this expected behavior, the uptake of 1‐[phenylsulfonyl)ethyl]lithium occurs at C(5) of the heptalenofuran‐1‐ones as long as they carry a Me group at C(11) (Schemes 6 and 7). The 1,4‐ as well as the 1,6‐addition products eliminate, on treatment with MeONa/MeOH in THF, benzenesulfinate, thus leading to 3‐ and 4‐alkylated dimethyl heptalene‐4,5‐dicarboxylates, respectively (Schemes 8–13). The configuration of the addition reaction of the nucleophiles to the inherently chiral heptalenes is discussed in detail (cf. Schemes 14–19) on the basis of a number of X‐ray crystal‐structure determinations as well as by studies of the temperature‐dependence of the ¹H‐NMR spectra of the addition products.     

Synthesis of Functionalized H‐[1]Benzopyrano[2,3‐b]pyridines by the Friedländer Approach: Antimycobacterial and Antimicrobial Profile

A series of functionalized H‐[1]benzopyrano[2,3‐b]pyridine derivatives were synthesized by the Friedländer reaction of 2‐amino‐4‐oxo‐4H‐chromene‐3‐carbonitriles 1 with malononitrile, ethyl cyanoacetate, or acetophenone (Scheme). The synthesized compounds 2 – 4 were screened for their in vitro activity against antitubercular, antibacterial, and antifungal species (Fig., Table). Among the synthesized compounds, 3c and 4f were the most active with 99% inhibition against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H₃₇Rv, while compounds 2f, 3f , and 4d exhibited 69%, 63%, and 61% inhibition, respectively. The 4‐amino‐7,9‐dibromo‐1,5‐dihydro‐2,5‐dioxo‐2H‐chromeno[2,3‐b]pyridine‐3‐carbonitrile ( 3b ) showed the most potent antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Several chromeno[2,3‐b]pyridine derivatives showed equal or more potency against Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans.     

Unexpected Approach to the Synthesis of 2‐Phenylquinoxalines and Pyrido[2,3‐b]pyrazines via a Regioselective Reaction

An unexpected approach to the preparation of quinoxaline and pyrido[2,3‐b]pyrazine derivatives 5 is described. The reaction between 1H‐indole‐2,3‐diones 1 , 1‐phenyl‐2‐(triphenylphosphoranylidene)ethanone ( 2 ), and benzene‐1,2‐ or pyridine‐2,3‐diamines 3 proceeds in MeOH under reflux in good to excellent yields (Scheme 1 and Table). No co‐catalyst or activator is required for this multi‐component reaction (MCR), and the reaction is, from an experimental point of view, simple to perform. The structures of 5, 5′ , and 6 were corroborated spectroscopically (IR, ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR, and EI‐MS) and were confirmed by comparison with reference compounds. A plausible mechanism for this type of reaction is proposed (Scheme 2).     

One‐pot Combinatorial Synthesis of Benzo[4,5]imidazo‐[1,2‐a]thiopyrano[3,4‐d]pyrimidin‐4(3H)‐one Derivatives

A series of novel fused tetracyclic benzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2‐a]thiopyrano[3,4‐d]pyrimidin‐4(3H)‐one derivatives were synthesized via the reaction of aryl aldehyde, 2H‐thiopyran‐3,5(4H,6H)‐dione, and 1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐2‐amine in glacial acetic acid. This protocol features mild reaction conditions, high yields and short reaction time.     

Utility of 1‐Chloro‐3,4‐dihydronaphthalene‐2‐carboxaldehyde in the Synthesis of Novel Heterocycles with Pharmaceutical Interest

Ethyl α‐cyano‐β‐(1‐chloro‐3,4‐dihydronaphthalene‐2‐yl) acrylate (2) was prepared by the Knoevenagel condensation of 1 with ethyl cyanoacetate. Compound 2 was used as the key intermediate to prepare Schiff bases (3a, b), benzo[c]acridine (4), naphthyl thiopyrimidine (5), and pyrazolo[2,3‐a]‐benzo[h]quinazoline (6) derivatives through its reaction with hydrazines, p‐ansidine, thiourea, and 3,5‐diamino‐4‐phenylazopyrazole, respectively. Base‐catalyzed cyclocondensation of 1 with hippuric acid gives oxazolone derivative (7). Reaction of compound 7 with aniline gave imidazolone derivative (9). Treatment of compound 1 with different types of diaminopyrazoles gave 6,7‐dihydro‐pyrazolo[2,3‐a]‐benzo[h]quinazoline (10–13) derivatives. The multicomponent reaction of compound 1 with pyrazolone and malononitrile in the presence of ammonium acetate furnished pyrazolo[3,4‐b]‐benzo[h]quinoline (14) while in the presence of piperidine afforded benzo[h]chromeno[2,3‐c]pyrazole derivative 15.     

Asymmetric Syntheses of New Polyhydroxylated Quinolizidines: Cross‐Aldol Reactions of 7‐Oxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptan‐2‐one and 3a,4a,7a,7b‐Tetrahydro[1,3]dioxolo[4,5]furo[2,3‐d]isoxazole‐3‐carbaldehyde Derivatives

The cross‐aldolization of (−)‐(1S,4R,5R,6R)‐6‐endo‐chloro‐5‐exo‐(phenylseleno)‐7‐oxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptan‐2‐one ((−)‐ 25 ) and of (+)‐(3aR,4aR,7aR,7bS)‐ ((+)‐ 26 ) and (−)‐(3aS,4aS,7aS,7bR)‐3a,4a,7a,7b‐tetrahydro‐6,6‐dimethyl[1,3]dioxolo[4,5]furo[2,3‐d]isoxazole‐3‐carbaldehyde ((−)‐ 26 ) was studied for the lithium enolate of (−)‐ 25 and for its trimethylsilyl ether (−)‐ 31 under Mukaiyama's conditions (Scheme 2). Protocols were found for highly diastereoselective condensation giving the four possible aldols (+)‐ 27 (`anti'), (+)‐ 28 (`syn'), 29 (`anti'), and (−)‐ 30 (`syn') resulting from the exclusive exo‐face reaction of the bicyclic lithium enolate of (−)‐ 25 and bicyclic silyl ether (−)‐ 31 . Steric factors can explain the selectivities observed. Aldols (+)‐ 27 , (+)‐ 28 , 29 , and (−)‐ 30 were converted stereoselectively to (+)‐1,4‐anhydro‐3‐{(S)‐[(tert‐butyl)dimethylsilyloxy][(3aR,4aR,7aR,7bS)‐3a,4a,7a,7b‐tetrahydro‐6,6‐dimethyl[1,3]dioxolo[4,5]‐furo[2,3‐d]isoxazol‐3‐yl]methyl}‐3‐deoxy‐2,6‐di‐O‐(methoxymethyl)‐α‐D ‐galactopyranose ((+)‐ 62 ), its epimer at the exocyclic position (+)‐ 70 , (−)‐1,4‐anhydro‐3‐{(S)‐[(tert‐butyl)dimethylsilyloxy][(3aS,4aS,7aS,7bR)‐3a,4a,7a,7b‐tetrahydro‐6,6‐dimethyl[1,3]dioxolo[4,5]furo[2,3‐d]isoxazol‐3‐yl]methyl}‐3‐deoxy‐2,6‐di‐O‐(methoxymethyl)‐α‐D ‐galactopyranose ((−)‐ 77 ), and its epimer at the exocyclic position (+)‐ 84 , respectively (Schemes 3 and 5). Compounds (+)‐ 62 , (−)‐ 77 , and (+)‐ 84 were transformed to (1R,2R,3S,7R,8S,9S,9aS)‐1,3,4,6,7,8,9,9a‐octahydro‐8‐[(1R,2R)‐1,2,3‐trihydroxypropyl]‐2H‐quinolizine‐1,2,3,7,9‐pentol ( 21 ), its (1S,2S,3R,7R,8S,9S,9aR) stereoisomer (−)‐ 22 , and to its (1S,2S,3R,7R,8S,9R,9aR) stereoisomer (+)‐ 23 , respectively (Schemes 6 and 7). The polyhydroxylated quinolizidines (−)‐ 22 and (+)‐ 23 adopt `trans‐azadecalin' structures with chair/chair conformations in which H−C(9a) occupies an axial position anti‐periplanar to the amine lone electron pair. Quinolizidines 21 , (−)‐ 22 , and (+)‐ 23 were tested for their inhibitory activities toward 25 commercially available glycohydrolases. Compound 21 is a weak inhibitor of β‐galactosidase from jack bean, of amyloglucosidase from Aspergillus niger, and of β‐glucosidase from Caldocellum saccharolyticum. Stereoisomers (−)‐ 22 and (+)‐ 23 are weak but more selective inhibitors of β‐galactosidase from jack bean.