Chemoselective Hydrogenation of Functionalized Nitroarenes and Imines by Using Carbon Nanofiber‐Supported Iridium Nanoparticles

The reaction of three types of carbon nanofibers (CNFs; platelet: CNF‐P, tubular: CNF‐T, herringbone: CNF‐H) with Ir₄(CO)₁₂ in mesitylene at 165 °C provided the corresponding CNF‐supported iridium nanoparticles, Ir/CNFs (Ir content=2.3–2.6 wt. %). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies of these Ir/CNF samples revealed that size‐controlled Ir nanoparticles (average particle size of 1.1–1.5 nm) existed on the CNFs. Among the three Ir/CNF samples, Ir/CNF‐T showed an excellent catalytic activity and chemoselectivity towards hydrogenation of functionalized nitroarenes and imines; the corresponding aniline derivatives were obtained with high turnover numbers at ambient temperature under 10 atm of H₂, and the catalyst is reusable. Ir/CNF‐T was also effective for the reductive N‐alkylation of anilines with carbonyl compounds.     

Ru/CNFs 催化剂催化氨分解制氢

 研究了鱼骨式碳纤维 (CNFs) 和管式碳纤维 (CNTs) 负载 Ru 催化剂的氨分解反应活性. 结果表明, Ru/CNFs 催化剂上氨分解活性高于 Ru/CNTs 催化剂. 通过改变 Ru 负载量或载体表面的含氧基团来调节 Ru 的粒径. Ru 的活性位随着 Ru 颗粒尺寸的增大而增加. CNFs 上的含氧基团对 Ru 颗粒的氨分解活性影响很大. 在相同粒径的 Ru 颗粒上, CNFs 表面的含氧基团增加了 Ru 的活性.     

Thermoregulated phase‐transfer catalysis via PEG‐armed Ru(II)‐bearing microgel core star polymers: Efficient and reusable Ru(II) catalysts for aqueous transfer hydrogenation of ketones

Thermoregulated phase‐transfer catalysis for the transfer hydrogenation of 2‐octanone in 2‐propanol/H₂O biphasic media was achieved with ruthenium‐bearing microgel‐core star polymers with amphiphilic, thermosensitive poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) arms [Ru(II)‐PEG star], which were directly prepared by the ruthenium‐catalyzed living radical polymerization in conjunction with a phosphine ligand‐carrying styrene derivative. The star polymers were first placed in the aqueous (lower) layer at room temperature and immediately moved into the organic (upper) layer at 100 °C, and once again, moved down to the aqueous layer (lower) upon cooling the solution to room temperature. The Ru(II)‐PEG star catalyst was clearly superior to the original Ru(II) catalyst and related non‐microgel catalysts [Ru(II)‐PEG block] in terms of activity and recovery/recycle, due to the unique designer structure of the microgel‐core star polymers. Other substrates (less hydrophobic alkyl ketones and aromatic ketone) were also efficiently hydrogenated into the corresponding sec‐alcohols with the star catalyst in aqueous media. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 373–379, 2010     

Ruthenium‐Catalyzed Transfer‐Hydrogenative Cyclization of 1,6‐Diynes with Hantzsch 1,4‐Dihydropyridine as a H2 Surrogate

The transfer‐hydrogenative cyclization of 1,6‐diynes with Hantzsch 1,4‐dihydropyridine as a H₂ surrogate was performed in the presence of a cationic ruthenium catalyst of the type [Cp′Ru(MeCN)₃PF₆]. Exocyclic 1,3‐dienes or their 1,4‐hydrogenation products, cycloalkenes, were selectively obtained, depending on the substrate structure and the reaction conditions.     

Low‐Valent Ruthenium Induced Simultaneous Reduction of Nitro Group and C‐C Double Bond in Nitroolefin 1‐Phenyl‐2‐Nitropropene‐1

The reduction of 1‐phenyl‐2‐nitropropene‐1 ( 1 ) on using ruthenium complexes was studied in detail in order to correlate this method with those previously recorded in the literature for the hydrogenation of nitroolefins. A variety of products was isolated by varying the reaction temperature and solvent. Among them was 1‐phenyl‐2‐propylamine ( 4 ), completely reduced from the selective both double bond and nitro group. 1‐Phenyl‐2‐propanol ( 5 ) was observed due to reduction of phenylacetone at 125 °C in the presence of ruthenium catalyst. When reaction temperature was lower than 125 °C, by employing RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ complex, 1‐phenyl‐2‐nitropropane ( 2 ) and phenylacetone ( 3 ) were obtained, respectively. Ru‐BINAP complexes were attempted to produce chiral amine from starting material 1‐phenyl‐2‐nitropropene‐1 ( 1 ).     

Understanding the catalytic activity of single‐chain polymeric nanoparticles in water

The structuring role of benzene‐1,3,5‐tricarboxamide (BTA) groups for the catalytic activity of single chain polymeric nanoparticles in water was investigated in the transfer hydrogenation of ketones. To this end, a set of segmented, amphiphilic copolymers was prepared, which comprised oligo(ethylene glycol) side chains to impart water solubility, BTA and/or lauryl side chains to induce hydrophobicity and diphenylphosphinostyrene (SDP) units in the middle part as a ligand to bind a ruthenium catalyst. All copolymers were obtained by reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization and showed low dispersities (M_w/M_n = 1.23–1.38) and controlled molecular weights (M_n = 44–28 kDa). A combination of circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering (DLS) showed that all copolymers fold into a single chain polymeric nanoparticles (SCPNs) as a result of the helical self‐assembly of the pendant BTA units and/or hydrophilic–hydrophobic phase separation. To create catalytic sites, RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ was incorporated into the copolymers. The Cotton effects of the copolymers before and after Ru(II) loading were identical, indicating that the helical self‐assembly of the BTA units and the complexation of SDP ligands and Ru(II) occurs in an orthogonal manner. DLS revealed that after Ru(II) loading, SDP‐bearing copolymers retained their single chain character in water, while copolymers lacking SDP units clustered into larger aggregates. The Ru(II) loaded SCPNs were tested in the transfer hydrogenation of cyclohexanone. This study reveals that BTA induced stack formation is not crucial for SCPN formation and catalytic activity; SDP‐bearing copolymers folded by Ru(II) complexation and hydrophobic pendants suffice to provide hydrophobic, isolated reaction pockets around Ru(II) complexes. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 12–20     

Transfer hydrogenation of ketones catalysed by half‐sandwich (η6‐p‐cymene) ruthenium(II) complexes incorporating benzoylhydrazone ligands

Neutral half‐sandwich η⁶‐p ‐cymene ruthenium(II) complexes of general formula [Ru(η⁶‐p ‐cymene)Cl(L)] (HL = monobasic O, N bidendate benzoylhydrazone ligand) have been synthesized from the reaction of [Ru(η⁶‐p ‐cymene)(μ‐Cl)Cl]₂ with acetophenone benzoylhydrazone ligands. All the complexes have been characterized using analytical and spectroscopic (Fourier transform infrared, UV–visible, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR) techniques. The molecular structures of three of the complexes have been determined using single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, indicating a pseudo‐octahedral geometry around the ruthenium(II) ion. All the ruthenium(II) arene complexes were explored as catalysts for transfer hydrogenation of a wide range of aromatic, cyclic and aliphatic ketones with 2‐propanol using 0.1 mol% catalyst loading, and conversions of up to 100% were obtained. Further, the influence of other variables on the transfer hydrogenation reaction, such as base, temperature, catalyst loading and substrate scope, was also investigated.     

Microwave Irradiation for the Facile Synthesis of Transition‐Metal Nanoparticles (NPs) in Ionic Liquids (ILs) from Metal–Carbonyl Precursors and Ru‐, Rh‐, and Ir‐NP/IL Dispersions as Biphasic Liquid–Liquid Hydrogenation Nanocatalysts for Cyclohexene

Stable chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, rhenium, ruthenium, osmium, cobalt, rhodium, and iridium metal nanoparticles (M‐NPs) have been reproducibly obtained by facile, rapid (3 min), and energy‐saving 10 W microwave irradiation (MWI) under an argon atmosphere from their metal–carbonyl precursors [M_x(CO)_y] in the ionic liquid (IL) 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([BMIm][BF₄]). This MWI synthesis is compared to UV‐photolytic (1000 W, 15 min) or conventional thermal decomposition (180–250 °C, 6–12 h) of [M_x(CO)_y] in ILs. The MWI‐obtained nanoparticles have a very small (<5 nm) and uniform size and are prepared without any additional stabilizers or capping molecules as long‐term stable M‐NP/IL dispersions (characterization by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), transmission electron diffraction (TED), and dynamic light scattering (DLS)). The ruthenium, rhodium, or iridium nanoparticle/IL dispersions are highly active and easily recyclable catalysts for the biphasic liquid–liquid hydrogenation of cyclohexene to cyclohexane with activities of up to 522 (mol product) (mol Ru)^?1 h^?1 and 884 (mol product) (mol Rh)^?1 h^?1 and give almost quantitative conversion within 2 h at 10 bar H₂ and 90 °C. Catalyst poisoning experiments with CS₂ (0.05 equiv per Ru) suggest a heterogeneous surface catalysis of Ru‐NPs.     

N-Heterocyclic Carbene (NHC)-Stabilized Ru0 Nanoparticles: In Situ Generation of an Efficient Transfer Hydrogenation Catalyst

Tethered and untethered ruthenium half-sandwich complexes were synthesized and characterized spectroscopically. X-ray crystallographic analysis of three untethered and two tethered Ru N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) complexes were also carried out. These RuNHC complexes catalyze transfer hydrogenation of aromatic ketones in 2-propanol under reflux, optimally in the presence of (25 mol %) KOH. Under these conditions, the formation of 2–3 nm-sized Ru⁰ nanoparticles was detected by TEM measurements. A solid-state NMR investigation of the nanoparticles suggested that the NHC ligands were bound to the surface of the Ru nanoparticles (NPs). This base-promoted route to NHC-stabilized ruthenium nanoparticles directly from arene-tethered ruthenium–NHC complexes and from untethered ruthenium–NHC complexes is more convenient than previously known routes to NHC-stabilized Ru nanocatalysts. Similar catalytically active RuNPs were also generated from the reaction of a mixture of [RuCl₂(p-cymene)]₂ and the NHC precursor with KOH in isopropanol under reflux. The transfer hydrogenation catalyzed by these NHC-stabilized RuNPs possess a high turnover number. The catalytic efficiency was significantly reduced if nanoparticles were exposed to air or allowed to aggregate and precipitate by cooling the reaction mixtures during the reaction.     

The composite catalysts of Cu/CuxO nanoparticles supported on the carbon fibers were prepared for styrene oxidation reaction

In this paper a novel simple method for preparing two different catalysts with various‐valences copper was reported. Carbon nanofibers supported copper‐cuprous oxide nanoparticles (Cu‐Cu₂O NPs/CNFs) and copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs/CNFs) through electrospinning, adsorption and reduction in the high‐pressure hydrogenation and the high‐temperature calcination methods. These catalysts were investigated by a series of characterizations and were applied in reaction in nitrogen atmosphere, which had a good catalytic activity and selectivity of benzaldehyde for the reaction. Above all, the new study has been certified clearly, in which Cu‐Cu₂O NPs/CNFs and CuO NPs/CNFs composite catalysts enhanced the generation of benzaldehydeand the excellent catalytic properties were exhibited.     

Fast preparation of PtRu catalysts supported on carbon nanofibers by the microwave-polyol method and their application to fuel cells

PtRu alloy nanoparticles (24 +/- 1 wt %, Ru/Pt atomic ratios = 0.91-0.97) supported on carbon nanofibers (CNFs) were prepared within a few minutes by using a microwave-polyol method. Three types of CNFs with very different surface structures, such as platelet, herringbone, and tubular ones, were used as new carbon supports. The dependence of particles sizes and electrochemical properties on the structures of CNFs was examined. It was found that the methanol fuel cell activities of PtRu/CNF catalysts were in the order of platelet > tubular > herringbone. The methanol fuel cell activities of PtRu/CNFs measured at 60 degrees C were 1.7-3.0 times higher than that of a standard PtRu (29 wt %, Ru/Pt atomic ratio = 0.92) catalyst loaded on carbon black (Vulcan XC72R) support. The best electrocatalytic activity was obtained for the platelet CNF, which is characterized by its edge surface and high graphitization degree.     

Liquid phase selective hydrogenation of phenol to cyclohexanone over Ru/Al<Subscript>2</Subscript>O<Subscript>3</Subscript> nanocatalyst under mild conditions

Highly monodispersed ruthenium nanoparticles were prepared via wet impregnation technique using RuCl₃ · nH₂O as a precursor. Ru nanoparticles were supported on Al₂O₃ to synthesize Ru nanocatalyst. The nanocatalyst was characterized by various techniques like XRD, SEM, TEM and BET analysis. The catalyst was used for hydrogenation of phenol under mild condition. The activity of the catalyst was checked by varying different parameters such as reaction temperature, time, H₂ partial pressure, metal loading and catalyst amount. The catalyst was recovered from product and reused up to four times without significant loss in its catalytic activity. After a reaction time of 1 h, Ru/Al₂O₃ nanocatalyst showed high reactivity (82% conversion) and selectivity to cyclohexanone (67%) at 80°C and 20 bar hydrogen pressure.     

Ruthenium(II) complexes derived from 2‐phenylthiazoline‐4‐carboxylic acid: structure and catalytic activity for transfer hydrogenation reaction

Piano‐stool ([(p‐cymene)Ru(thz)Cl], 2 ) and six‐coordinated ([Ru(thz)₂(PPh₃)₂], 3 ) ruthenium complexes derived from 2‐phenylthiazoline‐4‐carboxylic acid (Hthz, 1 ) were synthesized for the first time, and fully characterized using conventional methods. Also, the molecular structure of complex 3 was determined using X‐ray analysis. These complexes were evaluated as catalysts for transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds in the presence of isopropyl alcohol and KO^tBu. Complex 2 was found to be more active than 3 in transfer hydrogenation. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

All‐Polystyrene 3D‐Printed Electrochemical Device with Embedded Carbon Nanofiber‐Graphite‐Polystyrene Composite Conductor

Carbon nanofibres (CNFs) and graphite flake microparticles were added to thermoplastic polystyrene polymer with the aim of making new conductive blends suitable for 3D‐printing. Various polymer/carbon blends were evaluated for suitability as printable, electroactive material. An electrically conducting polystyrene composite was developed and used with commercially available polystyrene (HIPS) to manufacture electrodes suitable for electrochemical experiments. Electrodes were produced and evaluated for cyclic voltammetry of aqueous 1,1’‐ferrocenedimethanol and differential pulse voltammetry detection of aqueous Pb²⁺ via anodic stripping. A polystyrene/CNF/graphite (80/10/10 wt%) composite provides good conductivity and a stable electrochemical interface with well‐defined active geometric surface area. The printed electrodes form a stable interface to the polystyrene shell, give good signal to background voltammetric responses, and are reusable after polishing.     

Steric and Electronic Effects of Bidentate Phosphine Ligands on Ruthenium(II)‐Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide

The reactivity difference between the hydrogenation of CO₂ catalyzed by various ruthenium bidentate phosphine complexes was explored by DFT. In addition to the ligand dmpe (Me₂PCH₂CH₂PMe₂), which was studied experimentally previously, a more bulky diphosphine ligand, dmpp (Me₂PCH₂CH₂CH₂PMe₂), together with a more electron‐withdrawing diphosphine ligand, PN^MeP (Me₂PCH₂N^MeCH₂PMe₂), have been studied theoretically to analyze the steric and electronic effects on these catalyzed reactions. Results show that all of the most favorable pathways for the hydrogenation of CO₂ catalyzed by bidentate phosphine ruthenium dihydride complexes undergo three major steps: cis–trans isomerization of ruthenium dihydride complex, CO₂ insertion into the Ru?H bond, and H₂ insertion into the ruthenium formate ion. Of these steps, CO₂ insertion into the Ru?H bond has the lowest barrier compared with the other two steps in each preferred pathway. For the hydrogenation of CO₂ catalyzed by ruthenium complexes of dmpe and dmpp, cis–trans isomerization of ruthenium dihydride complex has a similar barrier to that of H₂ insertion into the ruthenium formate ion. However, in the reaction catalyzed by the PN^MePRu complex, cis–trans isomerization of the ruthenium dihydride complex has a lower barrier than H₂ insertion into the ruthenium formate ion. These results suggest that the steric effect caused by the change of the outer sphere of the diphosphine ligand on the reaction is not clear, although the electronic effect is significant to cis–trans isomerization and H₂ insertion. This finding refreshes understanding of the mechanism and provides necessary insights for ligand design in transition‐metal‐catalyzed CO₂ transformation.     

Highly Dispersed Ruthenium Hydroxide Supported on Titanium Oxide Effective for Liquid‐Phase Hydrogen‐Transfer Reactions

Supported ruthenium hydroxide catalysts (Ru(OH)_x/support) were prepared with three different TiO₂ supports (anatase TiO₂ (TiO₂(A), BET surface area: 316 m² g^?1), anatase TiO₂ (TiO₂(B), 73 m² g^?1), and rutile TiO₂ (TiO₂(C), 3.2 m² g^?1)), as well as an Al₂O₃ support (160 m² g^?1). Characterizations with X‐ray diffraction (XRD), X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), electron spin resonance (ESR), and X‐ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) showed the presence of monomeric ruthenium(III) hydroxide and polymeric ruthenium(III) hydroxide species. Judging from the coordination numbers of the nearest‐neighbor Ru atoms and the intensities of the ESR signals, the amount of monomeric hydroxide species increased in the order of Ru(OH)_x<Ru(OH)_x/TiO₂(C)<Ru(OH)_x/Al₂O₃<Ru(OH)_x/TiO₂(B)<Ru(OH)_x/TiO₂(A). These supported ruthenium hydroxide catalysts, especially Ru(OH)_x/TiO₂(A), showed high catalytic activities and selectivities for liquid‐phase hydrogen‐transfer reactions, such as racemization of chiral secondary alcohols and the reduction of carbonyl compounds and allylic alcohols. The catalytic activities of Ru(OH)_x/TiO₂(A) for these hydrogen‐transfer reactions were at least one order of magnitude higher than those of previously reported heterogeneous catalysts, such as Ru(OH)_x/Al₂O₃. These catalyses were truly heterogeneous, and the catalysts recovered after the reactions could be reused several times without loss of catalytic performance. The reaction rates monotonically increased with an increase in the amount of monomeric ruthenium hydroxide species, which suggests that the monomeric species are effective for these hydrogen‐transfer reactions.     

Two‐Photon Chemistry in Ruthenium 2,2′‐Bipyridyl‐Functionalized Single‐Wall Carbon Nanotubes

Ruthenium polypyridyl complexes are widely used as light harvesters in dye‐sensitized solar cells. Since one of the potential applications of single‐wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and their derived materials is their use as active components in organic and hybrid solar cells, the study of the photochemistry of SWCNTs with tethered ruthenium polypyridyl complexes is important. A water‐soluble ruthenium tris(bipyridyl) complex linked through peptidic bonds to SWCNTs (Ru‐SWCNTs) was prepared by radical addition of thiol‐terminated SWCNT to a terminal C?C double bond of a bipyridyl ligand of the ruthenium tris(bipyridyl) complex. The resulting macromolecular Ru‐SWCNT (≈500 nm, 15.6 % ruthenium complex content) was water‐soluble and was characterized by using TEM, thermogravimetric analysis, chemical analysis, and optical spectroscopy. The emission of Ru‐SWCNT is 1.6 times weaker than that of a mixture of [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ and SWCNT of similar concentration. Time‐resolved absorption optical spectroscopy allows the detection of the [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺‐excited triplet and [Ru(bpy)₃]⁺. The laser flash studies reveal that Ru‐SWCNT exhibits an unprecedented two‐photon process that is enabled by the semiconducting properties of the SWCNT. Thus, the effect of the excitation wavelength and laser power on the transient spectra indicate that upon excitation of two [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ complexes of Ru‐SWCNT, a disproportionation process occurs leading to delayed formation of [Ru(bpy)₃]⁺ and the performance of the SWCNT as a semiconductor. This two‐photon delayed [Ru(bpy)₃]⁺ generation is not observed in the photolysis of [Ru(bpy)₃]³⁺; SWCNT acts as an electron wire or electron relay in the disproportionation of two [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ triplets in a process that illustrates that the SWCNT plays a key role in the process. We propose a mechanism for this two‐photon disproportionation compatible with i) the need for high laser flux, ii) the long lifetime of the [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ triplets, iii) the semiconducting properties of the SWNT, and iv) the energy of the HOMO/LUMO levels involved.     

Fabrication of Ruthenium Nanoparticles in Porous Organic Polymers: Towards Advanced Heterogeneous Catalytic Nanoreactors

A novel strategy has been adopted for the construction of a copolymer of benzene–benzylamine‐1 (BBA‐1), which is a porous organic polymer (POP) with a high BET surface area, through Friedel–Crafts alkylation of benzylamine and benzene by using formaldehyde dimethyl acetal as a cross‐linker and anhydrous FeCl₃ as a promoter. Ruthenium nanoparticles (Ru NPs) were successfully distributed in the interior cavities of polymers through NaBH₄, ethylene glycol, and hydrothermal reduction routes, which delivered Ru‐A, Ru‐B, and Ru‐C materials, respectively, and avoided aggregation of metal NPs. Homogeneous dispersion, the nanoconfinement effect of the polymer, and the oxidation state of Ru NPs were verified by employing TEM, energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy mapping, cross polarization magic‐angle spinning ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy analytical tools. These three new Ru‐based POP materials exhibited excellent catalytic performance in the hydrogenation of nitroarenes at RT (with a reaction time of only ≈30 min), with high conversion, selectivity, stability, and recyclability for several catalytic cycles, compared with other traditional materials, such as Ru@C, Ru@SiO₂, and Ru@TiO₂, but no clear agglomeration or loss of catalytic activity was observed. The high catalytic performance of the ruthenium‐based POP materials is due to the synergetic effect of nanoconfinement and electron donation offered by the 3D POP network. DFT calculations showed that hydrogenation of nitrobenzene over the Ru (0001) catalyst surface through a direct reaction pathway is more favorable than that through an indirect reaction pathway.     

Synthesis of a highly active amino‐functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2/APTS/Ru magnetic nanocomposite catalyst for hydrogenation reactions

An amino‐functionalized silica‐coated Fe₃O₄ nanocomposite (Fe₃O₄@SiO₂/APTS) was synthesized. The Fe₃O₄@SiO₂ microspheres possessed a well‐defined core–shell structure, uniform sizes and high magnetization. An immobilized ruthenium nanoparticle catalyst (Fe₃O₄@SiO₂/APTS/Ru) was obtained after coordination and reduction of Ru³⁺ on the Fe₃O₄@SiO₂/APTS nanocomposite. The Ru nanoparticles were not only ultra‐small with nearly monodisperse sizes but also had strong affinity with the surface of Fe₃O₄@SiO₂/APTS. The obtained catalyst exhibited excellent catalytic performance for the hydrogenation of a variety of aromatic nitro compounds, even at room temperature. Moreover, Fe₃O₄@SiO₂/APTS/Ru was easily recovered using a magnetic field and directly reused for at least five cycles without significant loss of its activity.     

Acid‐, Water‐ and High‐Temperature‐Stable Ruthenium Complexes for the Total Catalytic Deoxygenation of Glycerol to Propane

The ruthenium aqua complexes [Ru(H₂O)₂(bipy)₂](OTf)₂, [cis‐Ru(6,6′‐Cl₂‐bipy)₂(OH₂)₂](OTf)₂, [Ru(H₂O)₂(phen)₂](OTf)₂, [Ru(H₂O)₃(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpy)](OTf)₂ and [Ru(H₂O)₃(Phterpy)](OTf)₂ (bipy=2,2′‐bipyridine; OTf^?=triflate; phen=phenanthroline; terpy= terpyridine; Phterpy=4′‐phenyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine) are water‐ and acid‐stable catalysts for the hydrogenation of aldehydes and ketones in sulfolane solution. In the presence of HOS(O)₂CF₃ (triflic acid) as a dehydration co‐catalyst they directly convert 1,2‐hexanediol to n‐hexanol and hexane. The terpyridine complexes are stable and active as catalysts at temperatures ≥250 °C and in either aqueous sulfolane solution or pure water convert glycerol into n‐propanol and ultimately propane as the final reaction product in up to quantitative yield. For the terpy complexes the active catalyst is postulated to be a carbonyl species [(4′‐R‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpy)Ru(CO)(H₂O)₂](OTf)₂ (R=H, Ph) formed by the decarbonylation of aldehydes (hexanal for 1,2‐hexanediol and 3‐hydroxypropanal for glycerol) generated in the reaction mixture through acid‐catalyzed dehydration. The structure of the dimeric complex [{(4′‐phenyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpy)Ru(CO)}₂(μ‐OCH₃)₂](OTf)₂ has been determined by single crystal X‐ray crystallography (Space group P (a=8.2532(17); b=12.858(3); c=14.363(3) Å; α=64.38(3); β=77.26(3); γ = 87.12(3)°, R=4.36 %).