trans‐Cyano(6‐methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecan‐6‐amine)cobalt(III) bis(perchlorate) hydrate and trans‐hydroxo(6‐methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecan‐6‐amine)cobalt(III) bis(perchlorate)

The crystal structures of a pair of closely related macrocyclic cyano‐ and hydroxopenta­amine­cobalt(III) complexes, as their perchlorate salts, are reported. Although the two complexes, [Co(CN)(C₁₁H₂₇N₅)](ClO₄)₂·H₂O and [Co(OH)(C₁₁H₂₇N₅)](ClO₄)₂, exhibit similar conformations, significant differences in the Co—N bond lengths arise from the influence of the sixth ligand (cyano as opposed to hydroxo). The ensuing hydrogen‐bonding patterns are also distinctly different. Disorder in the perchlorate anions was clearly resolved and this was rationalized on the basis of distinct hydrogen‐bonding motifs involving the anion O atoms and the N—H and O—H donors.     

trans‐Bis(thioacetato‐S)bis(triphenylphosphine‐P)nickel(II)

In the title compound, [Ni(C₂H₃OS)₂(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂], the Ni atom lies on an inversion centre and the tri­phenyl phosphine and thio­acetate ligands are bonded to the central Ni^II atom in a trans fashion, with Ni—S = 2.2020 (8) and Ni—P = 2.2528 (8) Å, and angle S—Ni—P = 92.47 (3)°.     

Synthesis by ATRP of poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene,poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐poly(4‐acetoxystyrene) and its hydrolysis product poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐poly(hydroxystyrene)

Diblock copolymers of poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene) and polystyrene or poly(4‐acetoxystyrene) are synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using a 2‐bromopropionic ester macroinitiator prepared from commercial monohydroxyl functional narrow dispersity hydrogenated polybutadiene (Kraton Liquid Polymer, L‐1203). ATRP carried out in bulk and in xylene solution with cuprous bromide and two different complexing agents 2,2′‐bipyridine (bipy) and 1,1,4,7,10,10‐hexamethyltriethylenetetraamine (HMTETA) yielded well‐defined diblock copolymers with polydispersities around 1,3. The diblock copolymer with poly(4‐acetoxystyrene) was hydrolyzed to the corresponding poly(4‐hydroxystyrene) sequence.     

Cancer‐associated pH‐responsive tetracopolymeric micelles composed of poly(ethylene glycol)‐b‐poly(L‐histidine)‐b‐poly(L‐lactic acid)‐b‐poly(ethylene glycol)

To create a novel vector for specifically delivering anticancer therapy to solid tumors, we used diafiltration to synthesize pH‐sensitive polymeric micelles. The micelles, formed from a tetrablock copolymer [poly(ethylene glycol)‐b‐poly(L ‐histidine)‐b‐poly(L ‐lactic acid)‐b‐poly(ethylene glycol)] consisted of a hydrophobic poly(L ‐histidine) (polyHis) and poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLA) core and a hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) shell, in which we encapsulated the model anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX). The robust micelles exhibited a critical micellar concentration (CMC) of 2.1–3.5 µg/ml and an average size of 65–80 nm pH 7.4. Importantly, they showed a pH‐dependent micellar destabilization, due to the concurrent ionization of the polyHis and the rigidity of the PLA in the micellar core. In particular, the molecular weight of PLA block affected the ionization of the micellar core. Depending on the molecular weight of the PLA block, the micelles triggering released DOX at pH 6.8 (i.e. cancer acidic pH) or pH 6.4 (i.e. endosomal pH), making this system a useful tool for specifically treating solid cancers or delivering cytoplasmic cargo in vivo. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Bis(tetra‐n‐butylammonium) (a redetermination at 150 K) and bis(tetraphenylarsonium) bis(1,3‐dithiole‐2‐thione‐4,5‐dithiolato)zinc(II) (at 300 K)

The title compounds are salts of the general form (Q⁺)₂[Zn(dmit)₂]^2?, where dmit corresponds to the ligand (C₃S₅)^? present in both and Q⁺ to the counter‐cations (ⁿBu₄N)⁺ [or C₁₆H₃₆N⁺] and (Ph₄As)⁺ [or C₂₄H₂₀As⁺], respectively. In the first case, Zn is in the 4e special positions of space group C2/c and hence the [Zn(dmit)₂]^2? dianion possesses twofold axial crystallographic symmetry. Including these, there are now 11 known examples of [Zn(dmit)₂]^2? or its analogues, with O replacing the exocyclic thione S, and [Zn(dmio)₂]^2? dianions in nine structures with various Q. Comparison of these reveals a remarkable variation in details of the conformation which the dianion may adopt in terms of Zn coordination, equivalence of the Zn—S bond lengths, displacement of Zn from the plane of the ligand and overall dianion shape.     

Tetraaquabis(d‐camphor‐10‐sulfonato)calcium(II)

The structure of the title compound, [Ca(C₁₀H₁₅O₄S)₂(H₂O)₄], is the first example in which two d ‐camphor‐10‐sulfonate anions are coordinated to a metal ion, in this case with direct Ca—O bonding. The molecule has crystallographically imposed twofold symmetry with the Ca atom on the twofold axis. Hydrogen bonds are formed between the coordinated water molecules and the O atoms of the SO₃⁻ groups of adjacent molecules, leading to the formation of a two‐dimensional layered network. The compound displays sharp wavelength‐selective transparency in the UV–visible spectrum, offering the potential for application as an optical filter.     

Hierarchical Self‐Assembly of Double‐Crystalline Poly(ferrocenyldimethylsilane)‐block‐poly(2‐iso‐propyl‐2‐oxazoline) (PFDMS‐b‐PiPrOx) Block Copolymers

The step‐wise solution self‐assembly of double crystalline organometallic poly(ferrocenyldimethylsilane)‐block‐poly(2‐iso‐propyl‐2‐oxazoline) (PFDMS‐b‐PiPrOx) diblock copolymers is demonstrated. Two block copolymers are obtained by copper‐catalyzed azide‐alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC), featuring PFDMS/PiPrOx weight fractions of 46/54 (PFDMS₃₀‐b‐PiPrOx₇₅) and 30/70 (PFDMS₃₀‐b‐PiPrOx₁₅₅). Nonsolvent induced crystallization of PFDMS in acetone leads in both cases to cylindrical micelles with a PFDMS core. Afterward, the structures are transferred into water for sequential temperature‐induced crystallization of the PiPrOx corona, leading to hierarchical double crystalline superstructures, which are investigated using scanning electron microscopy, wide angle X‐ray scattering, and differential scanning calorimetry.

     

Tetrakis(diethyl‐phosphonat)‐, Tetrakis(ethyl‐phenylphosphinat)‐ und Tetrakis(diphenylphosphin‐oxid)‐substituierte Phthalocyanine

Tetrakis(diethyl phosphonate), Tetrakis(ethyl phenylphosphinate)‐, and Tetrakis(diphenylphosphine oxide)‐Substituted Phthalocyanines The title compounds 7, 9 , and 11 are obtained by tetramerization of diethyl (3,4‐dicyanophenyl)phosphonate ( 5 ), ethyl (3,4‐dicyanophenyl)phenylphosphinate ( 8 ), and 4‐(diphenylphosphinyl)benzene‐1,2‐dicarbonitrile ( 10 ). The ³¹P‐NMR spectra of the phthalocyanines 7, 9 , and 11 and of their metal complexes present five to eight signals confirming the formation of four constitutional isomers with the expected C_4h, D_2h, C_2v, and C_s symmetry. In the FAB‐MS of the Zn, Cu, and Ni complexes of 7 and 9 , the peaks of dimeric phthalocyanines are observed. By gel‐permeation chromatography, the monomeric complex [Ni( 7 )] and a dimer [Ni( 7 )]₂ can be separated. These dimers differ from the known phthalocyanine dimers, i.e., possibly the P(O)(OEt)₂ and P(O)(Ph)(OEt) substituents in 7 and 9 are involved in complexation. The free phosphonic acid complex [Zn( 12 )] and [Cu( 12 )] are H₂O‐soluble. In the FAB‐MS of [Zn( 12 )], only the peaks of the dimer are present; the ESI‐MS confirms the existence of the dimer and the metal‐free dimer. In the UV/VIS spectrum of [Zn( 12 )], the hypsochromic shift characteristic for the known type of dimers from 660–700 nm to 620–640 nm is observed. As in the FAB‐MS of [Zn( 12 )], the free phosphinic acid complex [Zn( 13 )] shows only the monomer, an ESI‐MS cannot be obtained for solubility problems. The UV/VIS spectrum of [Zn( 13 )] demonstrates the existence of the monomer as well as of the dimer.     

(Azulene‐1,3‐diyl)‐bis(nitronyl nitroxide) and (Azulene‐1,3‐diyl)‐bis(iminonitroxide) and Their Copper Complexes

In contrast to diradicals connected by alternant hydrocarbons, only a few studies on those connected by nonalternant hydrocarbons have been reported. The syntheses, structures, and magnetic properties of azulene‐1,3‐diyl linked bis(nitronyl nitroxide) (NN₂Az) and bis(iminonitroxide) (IN₂Az) diradicals and their Cu(hfac)₂ (hfac=hexafluoroacetylacetonate) complexes were investigated. NN₂Az was shown to have an intramolecular ferromagnetic interaction with J _obs/k _B=+10.0 K (H =−2J S ₁ ⋅S ₂) between (nitronyl nitroxide) spins, whereas IN₂Az was estimated to have a much weaker intramolecular magnetic interaction. The reactions of NN₂Az and IN₂Az with Cu(hfac)₂ gave a 1:2 [{Cu(hfac)₂}₂(NN₂Az)] complex and a 1:1 [Cu(hfac)₂(IN₂Az)] ⋅ C₆H₁₂ complex, respectively. [{Cu(hfac)₂}₂(NN₂Az)] showed strong intramolecular antiferromagnetic interactions (J _1‐Cu‐R/k _B≈−800 K, J _2‐Cu‐R/k _B≈−500 K) between the Cu^II spins and the coordinating NN spins, whereas [Cu(hfac)₂(IN₂Az)] exhibited a ferromagnetic exchange interaction (J _obs‐Cu‐R/k _B=+114 K) between the Cu^II spin and the imino‐coordinated iminonitroxide spin.     

Synthesis and characterization of poly(L‐lactide‐co‐ε‐caprolactone) (B)‐poly(L‐lactide) (A) ABA block copolymers

ABA triblock copolymers of L ‐lactide (LL) and ε‐caprolactone (CL), designated as PLL‐P(LL‐co‐CL)‐PLL, were synthesized via a two‐step ring‐opening polymerization in bulk using diethylene glycol and stannous octoate as the initiating system. In the first‐step reaction, an approximately 50:50 mol% P(LL‐co‐CL) random copolymer (prepolymer) was prepared as the middle (B) block. This was then chain extended in the second‐step reaction by terminal block polymerization with more L ‐lactide. The percentage yields of the triblock copolymers were in excess of 95%. The prepolymers and triblock copolymers were characterized using a combination of dilute‐solution viscometry, gel permeation chromatography (GPC), ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). It was found that the molecular weight of the prepolymer was controlled primarily by the diethylene glycol concentration. All of the triblock copolymers had molecular weights higher than their respective prepolymers. ¹³C‐NMR analysis confirmed that the prepolymers contained at least some random character and that the triblock copolymers consisted of additional terminal PLL end (A) blocks. From their DSC curves, the triblock copolymers were seen to be semi‐crystalline in morphology. Their glass transition, solid‐state crystallization, and melting temperature ranges, together with their heats of melting, all increased as the PLL end (A) block length increased. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis and properties of biomimetic poly(L‐glutamate)‐b‐poly(2‐acryloyloxyethyllactoside)‐b‐poly(L‐glutamate) triblock copolymers

A novel class of biomimetic glycopolymer–polypeptide triblock copolymers [poly(L ‐glutamate)–poly(2‐acryloyloxyethyllactoside)–poly(L ‐glutamate)] was synthesized by the sequential atom transfer radical polymerization of a protected lactose‐based glycomonomer and the ring‐opening polymerization of β‐benzyl‐L ‐glutamate N‐carboxyanhydride. Gel permeation chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance analyses demonstrated that triblock copolymers with defined architectures, controlled molecular weights, and low polydispersities were successfully obtained. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of the triblock copolymers revealed that the α‐helix/β‐sheet ratio increased with the poly(benzyl‐L ‐glutamate) block length. Furthermore, the water‐soluble triblock copolymers self‐assembled into lactose‐installed polymeric aggregates; this was investigated with the hydrophobic dye solubilization method and ultraviolet–visible analysis. Notably, this kind of aggregate may be useful as an artificial polyvalent ligand in the investigation of carbohydrate–protein recognition and for the design of site‐specific drug‐delivery systems. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 5754–5765, 2004     

Undecacarbonyl(methylcyclopentadienyl)‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum,undecacarbonyl(tetramethylcyclopentadienyl)‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum and undecacarbonyl(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum

The three title compounds tri‐μ‐carbonyl‐1:2κ²C;1:3κ²C;2:3κ²C‐octacarbonyl‐1κC,2κ²C,3κ²C,4κ³C‐η⁵‐methylcyclopentadienyl‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum(3 Ir—Ir)(3 Ir—Mo), tri‐μ‐carbonyl‐1:2κ²C;1:3κ²C;2:3κ²C‐octacarbonyl‐1κC,2κ²C,3κ²C,4κ³C‐η⁵‐tetramethylcyclopentadienyl‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum(3 Ir—Ir)(3 Ir—Mo) and tri‐μ‐carbonyl‐1:2κ²C;1:3κ²C;2:3κ²C‐octacarbonyl‐1κC,2κ²C,3κ²C,4κ³C‐η⁵‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum(3 Ir—Ir)(3 Ir—Mo), [MoIr₃(η⁵‐C₅H_5?nMe_n)(μ‐CO)₃(CO)₈], where n = 1, 4 or 5, have a pseudo­tetrahedral MoIr₃ core geometry, with a η⁵‐C₅H_5?nMe_n group ligating the Mo atom, bridging carbonyls spanning the edges of an MoIr₂ face, and eight terminally bound carbonyls.     

(4,6‐Dimethyl‐2‐sulfanylidenepyrimidin‐1‐ium) trichlorido(thiourea‐κS)zinc(II)

The title compound, (C₆H₉N₂S)[ZnCl₃{SC(NH₂)₂}], exists as a zincate where the zinc(II) centre is coordinated by three chloride ligands and a thiourea ligand to form the anion. The organic cation adopts the protonated 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐sulfanylidenepyrimidin‐1‐ium (L) form of 4,6‐dimethylpyrimidine‐2(1H)‐thione. Two short N—H...Cl hydrogen bonds involving the pyrimidine H atoms and the [ZnCl₃L]⁻ anion form a crystallographically centrosymmetric dimeric unit consisting of two anions and two cations. The packing structure is completed by longer‐range hydrogen bonds donated by the thiourea NH₂ groups to chloride ligand hydrogen‐bond acceptors.     

Hexakis(prop‐2‐enamide)copper(II) bis(perchlorate) and hexakis(prop‐2‐enamide)manganese(II) bis(perchlorate)

The structures of [Cu(AA)₆](ClO₄)₂, (I), and [Mn(AA)₆](ClO₄)₂, (II) (AA is acrylamide, also known as prop‐2‐enamide; C₃H₅NO), display both intra‐ and intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonding. A three‐dimensional network is propagated via the perchlorate counter‐ions. There are two crystallographically independent molecules in the copper complex, with the most significant difference between them being the conformation of one symmetry‐related pair of AA ligands which are in the unusual syn conformation. The copper complex exhibits syn/anti disorder of the =CH₂ group in one pair of symmetry‐related AA ligands. The Cu^II and Mn^II centres are both situated on centres of inversion. The copper complex cation has octahedral coordination geometry with typical Jahn–Teller distortions.     

trans‐Bis(diethanolamine‐N,O)bis(saccharinato‐N)cadmium(II)

The structure of the title complex consists of isolated [Cd(C₇H₄NO₃S)₂(C₄H₁₁NO₂)₂] units. The Cd²⁺ cation lies on an inversion centre and is octahedrally coordinated by two N,O‐bidentate diethanol­amine (dea) and two N‐bonded saccharinate (sac) ligands [saccharin is 1,2‐benziso­thia­zol‐3(2H)‐one 1,1‐dioxide]. The dea ligands constitute the equatorial plane of the octahedron, forming two five‐membered chelate rings around the Cd^II ion, while the sac ligands are localized at the axial positions. The Cd—N_sac, Cd—N_dea and Cd—O_dea bond distances are 2.3879 (12), 2.3544 (14) and 2.3702 (13) Å, respectively. The H atoms of the free and coordinated hydroxyl groups of the dea ligands are involved in hydrogen bonding with the carbonyl and sulfonyl O atoms of the neighbouring sac ions, while the amine H atom forms a hydrogen bond with the free hydroxyl O atom. The individual mol­ecules are held together by strong hydrogen bonds, forming an infinite three‐dimensional network.     

(S)‐3‐(Ammoniomethyl)‐5‐methylhexanoate (pregabalin)

The title compound, C₈H₁₇NO₂, exists as a zwitterion, adopting a propeller conformation. Molecules self‐assemble to form a hydrogen‐bonded layer parallel to the ab crystallographic plane connected by N⁺—H...O⁻ and C—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds. These layers are stacked along the c axis and are stabilized by van der Waals interactions.     

Geometric isomers of chloro(6‐methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecane‐6‐amine)cobalt(III) tetrachlorozincate(II)

The crystal structures of a pair of cis and trans isomers of the macrocyclic chloro­penta­amine title complex, as their tetra­chloro­zincate(II) salts, [CoCl(C₁₁H₂₇N₅)][ZnCl₄], are re­ported. The two distinct isomeric forms lead to significant variations in the Co—N bond lengths and, furthermore, hydrogen bonding between the complex ions is influenced by the folded (cis) or planar (trans) conformations of the coordinated ligand.     

(2‐Methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato)­iron(III) and ‐copper(II) complexes

The crystal structures of tris(2‐methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato‐N,O)­iron(III), [Fe­(C₁₀­H₈­NO)₃], (I), and aqua­bis(2‐methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato‐N,O)­copper(II), [Cu­(C₁₀­H₈NO)₂­(H₂O)], (II), have been determined. Compound (I) has a distorted octahedral configuration, in which the central Fe atom is coordinated by three N atoms and three O atoms from three 2‐methylquinolin‐8‐olate ligands. The three Fe—O bond distances are in the range 1.934 (2)–1.947 (2) Å, while the three Fe—N bond distances range from 2.204 (2) to 2.405 (2) Å. In compound (II), the central Cu^II atom and H₂O group lie on the crystallographic twofold axis and the coordination geometry of the Cu^II atom is close to trigonal bipyramidal, with the three O atoms in the basal plane and the two N atoms in apical positions. The Cu—N bond length is 2.018 (5) Å. The Cu—O bond length in the basal positions is 1.991 (4) Å, while the Cu—O bond length in the apical position is 2.273 (6) Å. There is an intermolecular OW—H?O hydrogen bond which links the mol­ecules into a linear chain along the b axis.