Photocycloisomerization of Boc‐Protected 5‐Alkenyl‐2,5‐dihydro‐1H‐ pyrrol‐2‐ones

On irradiation (254 nm), the newly synthesized Boc‐protected 5‐alkenyl‐2,5‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrrol‐2‐ones 13 undergo regioselective intramolecular [2+2] photocycloadditions. While the allyl derivatives 13a – 13c afford mainly azatricyclo[3.3.0.0^2,7]octanones, i.e., crossed cycloadducts, the butenyl‐ and pentenyl‐substituted compounds 13d and 13e isomerize preferentially to straight cycloadducts.     

Cycloaddition Reactions of 7‐Benzylidenecycloocta‐1,3,5‐triene with Ethenetetracarbonitrile and 4‐Phenyl‐3H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3,5(4H)‐dione

An (E)/(Z) mixture (3 : 2) of 7‐benzylidenecycloocta‐1,3,5‐triene ( 5 ) is obtained when 1‐benzylcycloocta‐1,3,5,7‐tetraene ( 7 ), prepared by an improved procedure, is treated with t‐BuOK in THF. Alternatively, a ca. 9 : 1 mixture (E)/(Z)‐ 5 can be prepared in a Wittig reaction involving benzaldehyde and cycloocta‐2,4,6‐trien‐1‐ylidenetriphenylphoshorane ( 9 ). Treatment of (E)/(Z)‐ 5 88 : 12 with ethenetetracarbonitrile (TCNE) gave a complex mixture of products, from which seven mono‐adducts and two bis‐adducts were isolated (Sect. 2.2.1). Of the mono‐adducts, four are π4+π2 adducts: two ((E)‐ and (Z)‐isomers) are derived from valence tautomers of the two isomers of (E)/(Z)‐ 5 , while it is tentatively suggested that the other two (again (E)‐ and (Z)‐isomers) are formed from the intermediacy of a pentadienyl zwitterion (Sect. 2.3). The remaining three mono‐adducts, two of which are epimers, are π8+π2 adducts. It is suggested that they are derived from the intermediacy of homotropylium zwitterions (Sect. 2.3). For the two bis‐adducts, it is postulated that they are derived from an initial π2+π2 cycloaddition involving the homotropylium zwitterions followed by π4+π2 cycloaddition to the valence tautomer of each of the π2+π2 cycloadducts. With 4‐phenyl‐3H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3,5(4H)‐dione ( 6 ), (E)/(Z)‐ 5 91 : 9 yielded two π4+π2 cycloadducts ((E)‐ and (Z)‐isomers) as well as two epimeric π8+π2 cycloadducts (Sect. 2.2.2). The intermediacy of pentadienyl (tentative suggestion) and homotropylium zwitterions accounts for the formation of the products (Sect. 2.3).     

Regioselective Synthesis of Mono‐ and Dispiropyrazoline Derivatives via 1,3‐dipolar Cycloaddition with Nitrilimines

The 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition reaction of (E ,E )‐1,3‐bis(arylidene)indan‐2‐one 1a , 1b , 1c , 1d , 1e with diarylnitrilimines, generated in situ via dehydrohalogenation of the corresponding hydrazonoyl chlorides 2a , 2b , 2c , affords predominantly monospiropyrazolines 3 and 4 as a mixture of diastereoisomers. Also dispiropyrazolines 5 are formed in moderate yields. The structure and stereochemistry of cycloadducts 3 , 4 , 5 were confirmed by ¹H and ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy, elemental analyses data, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies of 3ba and 5ca .     

Exploring the Border between Concerted and Two‐Step Pathways of 1,3‐Dipolar Cycloadditions of Organic Azides to Cyclic Ketene N,X‐Acetals. – Synthesis and 15N‐NMR Spectra of Zwitterions and Spirocyclic Cycloadducts

Cyclic ketene N,X‐acetals 1 are electron‐rich dipolarophiles that undergo 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition reactions with organic azides 2 ranging from alkyl to strongly electron‐deficient azides, e.g., picryl azide ( 2L ; R¹=2,4,6‐(NO₂)₃C₆H₂) and sulfonyl azides 2M – O (R¹=XSO₂; cf. Scheme 1). Reactions of the latter with the most‐nucleophilic ketene N,N‐acetals 1A provided the first examples for two‐step HOMO(dipolarophile)–LUMO(1,3‐dipole)‐controlled 1,3‐dipolar cycloadditions via intermediate zwitterions 3 . To set the stage for an exploration of the frontier between concerted and two‐step 1,3‐dipolar cycloadditions of this type, we first describe the scope and limitations of concerted cycloadditions of 2 to 1 and delineate a number of zwitterions 3 . Alkyl azides 2A – C add exclusively to ketene N,N‐acetals that are derived from 1H‐tetrazole (see 1A ) and 1H‐imidazole (see 1B , C ), while almost all aryl azides yield cycloadducts 4 with the ketene N,X‐acetals (X=NR, O, S) employed, except for the case of extreme steric hindrance of the 1,3‐dipole (see 2E ; R¹=2,4,6‐(^tBu)₃C₆H₂). The most electron‐deficient paradigm, 2L , affords zwitterions 16D , E in the reactions with 1A , while ketene N,O‐ and N,S‐acetals furnish products of unstable intermediate cycloadducts. By tuning the electronic and steric demands of aryl azides to those of ketene N,N‐acetals 1A , we discovered new borderlines between concerted and two‐step 1,3‐dipolar cycloadditions that involve similar pairs of dipoles and dipolarophiles: 4‐Nitrophenyl azide ( 2G ) and the 2,2‐dimethylpropylidene dipolarophile 1A (R, R=H, ^tBu) gave a cycloadduct 13 H , while 2‐nitrophenyl azide ( 2 H ) and the same dipolarophile afforded a zwitterion 16A . Isopropylidene dipolarophile 1A (R=Me) reacted with both 2G and 2 H to afford cycloadducts 13G , J ) but furnished a zwitterion 16B with 2,4‐dinitrophenyl azide ( 2I) . Likewise, 1A (R=Me) reacted with the isomeric encumbered nitrophenyl azides 2J and 2K to yield a cycloadduct 13L and a zwitterion 16C , respectively. These examples suggest that, in principle, a host of such borderlines exist which can be crossed by means of small structural variations of the reactants. Eventually, we use ¹⁵N‐NMR spectroscopy for the first time to characterize spirocyclic cycloadducts 10 – 14 and 17 (Table 6), and zwitterions 16 (Table 7).     

Structural characterization of isomeric 2,3,5‐substituted tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4‐d]isoxazole‐4,6‐diones prepared by cycloaddition of N‐methyl‐C‐arylnitrones to N‐phenyl‐ or N‐methylmaleimide

1,3‐Dipolar cycloaddition reactions of N‐methyl‐C‐arylnitrones with N‐phenyl‐ or N‐methylmaleimide were studied. The reaction of p‐dimethylamino‐, 4‐benzyloxy‐3‐methoxy‐, p‐nitro‐ and p‐chloro‐substituted phenylnitrones with N‐phenylmaleimide gave cis and trans cycloadducts but that of the corresponding phenylnitrones with N‐methylmaleimides only the cis adducts in the case of p‐dimethylamino and 4‐benzyloxy‐3‐methoxy substitution. All cis adducts attain a biased conformation whereas the trans forms are shown (by ¹H NMR at 233 K and ¹³C NMR at 208 K) to be mixtures of two invertomers, namely o‐(N‐lone pair antiperiplanar to 3H; minor) and i‐conformations (3H‐C‐C‐3aH dihedral angle close to 90°; major). PM3 and DFT calculations at the B3LYP/6–31G(d) level of theory prove qualitatively that these two conformers of the trans adduct are of comparable stability and represent energy minima.     

1,3‐Dipolar cycloadditions of (4R*,5R*)‐1‐alkylidene‐4‐(benzoylamino)‐5‐phenyl‐3‐pyrazolidinon‐1‐azomethine imines

1,3‐Dipolar cycloadditions of azomethine imines 3a and 3b , available by acid‐catalyzed treatment of 3‐pyrazolidinone 1 with acetone ( 2a ) and butyraldehyde ( 2b ), respectively, were studied. Reactions of 3a with DMAD ( 4 ) afforded a mixture of products 9 and 10a , whilst treatment of 3b with DMAD ( 4 ) gave a mixture of compound 9 and epimeric cycloadducts 10 / 10′b . On the other hand, cycloadducts 13a,b‐16a,b were isolated as single diastereomers in 9–37% yields upon reactions of 3a,b with olefinic dipolarophiles 5–8 . The structures of cycloadducts 9, 10a, 10/10′b , and 13a,b‐16a,b were determined by ¹H nmr and NOESY spectroscopy. The structure of compound 13a was confirmed by X‐ray diffraction.     

1,3‐Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactions of Indan‐1‐one Enamines across Arylnitrile Oxides Leading to Novel Cyclic Isoxazoline Derivatives

Synthesis of a series of cyclic fused‐isoxazolines has been accomplished by regioselective and diastereoselective 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition of 3‐methylindan‐1‐one enamines ( 1a , 1b , 1c ) and 3‐phenylindan‐1‐one enamines ( 2a , 2b , 2c ) to arylnitrile oxides ( 3d , 3e , 3f , 3g , 3h ). The structure of the cycloadducts was elucidated by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The proposed regio‐ and stereochemistry of fused‐compounds ( 4 ) and ( 5 ) has also been corroborated by two single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies carried out on 4‐methyl‐8b‐morpholinyl‐3‐(p‐tolyl)‐4H‐3a,8b‐dihydroindeno[2,3‐d]isoxazoline ( 4be ) and 3‐(p‐anisyl)‐4‐phenyl‐8b‐pyrrolidinyl‐4H‐3a,8b‐dihydroindeno[2,3‐d]isoxazoline ( 5af ) and by means of density functional theory calculations.     

Light‐Induced Cycloaddition of 2,3‐Dihydro‐2,2‐dimethyl‐4H‐thiopyran‐4‐one (a 4‐Thiacyclohex‐2‐enone) to Alkenes and Dienes

The reactivity of (thiacyclic)‐2,3‐dihydro‐2,2‐dimethyl‐4H‐thiopyran‐4‐one ( 1a ) in light‐induced cycloadditions to furan ( F ), acrylonitrile ( AN ), or 2,3‐dimethylbut‐2‐ene ( TME ) is compared to that of (carbocyclic) 5,5‐dimethylcyclohex‐2‐enone ( 1b ). Whereas for the more‐flexible thiacycle, the efficiency of [2+2]‐photocycloadduct formation with AN or TME is generally much lower, the diastereoselectivity regarding the ring fusion in the bicyclo[4.2.0]octanes is quite similar for both enones. In contrast, 1a affords exclusively trans‐fused [4+2] cycloadducts with F , while 1b gives predominantly the corresponding cis‐fused products.     

Diastereoselective 1,3‐Dipolar Cycloadditions of Chiral Derivatives of 2‐Oxoethanenitrile Oxide to Noncyclic Conjugated Symmetrical Alkenes

Asymmetric 1,3‐dipolar cycloadditions of chiral derivatives of the nitrile oxides 3a – 3c derived from (2R)‐bornane‐10,2‐sultam, (2R)‐10‐(dicyclohexylsulfamoyl)isoborneol, and (1R)‐8‐phenylmenthol, to either (E)‐stilbene 4 or dimethyl fumarate 5 , leading to the corresponding 4,5‐dihydroisoxazoles 6a – 6c and 7a – 7c in both moderate yields and diastereoselectivities, are presented. All cycloadducts were converted into the corresponding methyl esters 8 and 9 , which were used for determination of their enantiomeric purities via chiral HPLC analyses. In the case of both stilbene cycloadducts 6a and 6b , their absolute configurations were determined by X‐ray crystal‐structure analyses. These [3+2] cycloadditions suggest the participation of the thermodynamically less stable SO₂/CO syn‐conformer in the π_y approach along the C?O bond of the linear nitrile oxide 3a .     

New Studies on [2+3] Cycloadditions of Thermally Generated N‐Isopropyl‐ and N‐(4‐Methoxyphenyl)‐Substituted Azomethine Ylides

The thermal reaction of 1‐substituted 2,3‐diphenylaziridines 2 with thiobenzophenone ( 6a ) and 9H‐fluorene‐9‐thione ( 6b ) led to the corresponding 1,3‐thiazolidines (Scheme 2). Whereas the cis‐disubstituted aziridines and 6a yielded only trans‐2,4,5,5‐tetraphenyl‐1,3‐thiazolidines of type 7 , the analogous reaction with 6b gave a mixture of trans‐ and cis‐2,4‐diphenyl‐1,3‐thiazolidines 7 and 8 . During chromatography on SiO₂, the trans‐configured spiro[9H‐fluorene‐9,5′‐[1,3]thiazolidines] 7c and 7d isomerized to the cis‐isomers. The substituent at N(1) of the aziridine influences the reaction rate significantly, i.e., the more sterically demanding the substituent the slower the reaction. The reaction of cis‐2,3‐diphenylaziridines 2 with dimethyl azodicarboxylate ( 9 ) and dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate ( 11 ) gave the trans‐cycloadducts 10 and 12 , respectively (Schemes 3 and 4). In the latter case, a partial dehydrogenation led to the corresponding pyrroles. Two stereoisomeric cycloadducts, 15 and 16 , with a trans‐relationship of the Ph groups were obtained from the reaction with dimethyl fumarate ( 14 ; Scheme 5); with dimethyl maleate ( 17 ), the expected cycloadduct 18 together with the 2,3‐dihydropyrrole 19 was obtained (Scheme 6). The structures of the cycloadducts 7b, 8a, 15b , and 16b were established by X‐ray crystallography.     

Applications of Aziridinium Ions: Selective Syntheses of Pyrazolidin‐3‐ones and Pyrazolo[1,2‐a]pyrazoles

Reaction of ethyl (2S*,3R*)‐3‐chloro‐2‐(dialkylamino)‐3‐phenylpropanoates ( 4 ) with hydrazine monohydrate gave pyrazolidin‐3‐ones ( 5 ) via selective opening of the in situ generated aziridinium ions, followed by intramolecular amidation. (1Z,4S*,5S*)‐1‐Arylmethylidene‐4‐(dialkylamino)‐3‐oxo‐5‐phenylpyrazolidinium‐1‐ide ( 6 ), prepared from pyrazolidin‐3‐ones ( 5 ) and aromatic aldehydes under acid catalysis, reacted with a variety of 1,3‐dipolarophiles to afford good yields of pure cycloadducts 7 – 11 . The cycloaddition regio‐ and/or stereoselectivities, in all relevant cases, were also high.     

Regioselective `One‐Pot' Synthesis of Antipodal Bis‐adducts by Heating of Solid [5,6]Fullerene‐C60‐Ih and Anthracenes,Preliminary Communication

Antipodal (`trans‐1') Diels‐Alder bis‐adducts 3 and 7 – 9 of [5,6]fullerene‐C₆₀‐I_h ( 1 ) with some anthracenes were prepared highly regioselectively by heating mixtures of the solid 1 and anthracene or of (one of) three alkyl‐substituted anthracenes in the absence of solvents (Scheme 2). Other bis‐cycloadducts were not detected, but lesser amounts of mono‐cycloadducts 2 and 4 – 6 , respectively, were also formed. Heating of solvent‐free mixtures of 1 and three other alkyl‐substituted anthracenes did not result in a detectable amount of (antipodal) bis‐cycloadducts. The antipodal bis‐adduct 7 of 1 and of 1‐methylanthracene was analyzed by X‐ray crystallography. The preparative outcome of heating of anthracenes and solid 1 parallels the result of the heating of the corresponding crystalline mono‐adducts of anthracenes and 1 . Both approaches reveal a remarkably consistent dependence of the reaction upon the presence and position of alkyl substituents at the anthracene unit. The regioselective assembly of antipodal bis‐adducts from anthracene(s) and 1 cannot be rationalized by their (inherent molecular) stability, but it indicates the crucial control of the lattice.     

Reactions of Methyl Diazoacetate with (E)‐ and (Z)‐1,2‐Bis(trifluoromethyl)ethene‐1,2‐dicarbonitrile: Novel and Unanticipated Pathways

The cycloadditions of methyl diazoacetate to 2,3‐bis(trifluoromethyl)fumaronitrile ((E)‐ BTE ) and 2,3‐bis(trifluoromethyl)maleonitrile ((Z)‐ BTE ) furnish the 4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazoles 13 . The retention of dipolarophile configuration proceeds for (E)‐ BTE with > 99.93% and for (Z)‐ BTE with > 99.8% (CDCl₃, 25°), suggesting concertedness. Base catalysis (1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO), proton sponge) converts the cycloadducts, trans‐ 13 and cis‐ 13 , to a 94 : 6 equilibrium mixture (CDCl₃, r.t.); the first step is N‐deprotonation, since reaction with methyl fluorosulfonate affords the 4,5‐dihydro‐1‐methyl‐1H‐pyrazoles. Competing with the cis/trans isomerization of 13 is the formation of a bis(dehydrofluoro) dimer (two diastereoisomers), the structure of which was elucidated by IR, ¹⁹F‐NMR, and ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy. The reaction slows when DABCO is bound by HF, but F^? as base keeps the conversion to 22 going and binds HF. The diazo group in 22 suggests a common intermediate for cis/trans isomerization of 13 and conversion to 22 : reversible ring opening of N‐deprotonated 13 provides 18 , a derivative of methyl diazoacetate with a carbanionic substituent. Mechanistic comparison with the reaction of diazomethane and dimethyl 2,3‐dicyanofumarate, a related tetra‐acceptor‐ethylene, brings to light unanticipated divergencies.     

The Diels–Alder Reaction of 4,6‐Dinitrobenzofuroxan with 1‐Trimethylsilyloxybuta‐1,3‐diene: A Case Example of a Stepwise Cycloaddition

The reaction of 4,6‐dinitrobenzofuroxan (DNBF) with 1‐trimethylsilyloxybuta‐1,3‐diene ( 8 ) is shown to afford a mixture of [2+4] diastereomeric cycloadducts ( 10 , 11 ) through stepwise addition–cyclization pathways. Zwitterionic intermediate σ‐adduct 9 , which is involved in the processes, has been successfully characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and UV/visible spectrophotometry in acetonitrile. A kinetic study has been carried out in this solvent that revealed that the rate of formation of 9 nicely fits the three‐parameter equation log k=s(E+N) developed by Mayr to describe the feasibility of nucleophile–electrophile combinations. This significantly adds to the NMR spectroscopic evidence that the overall cycloadditions take place through a stepwise mechanism. The reaction has also been studied in dichloromethane and toluene. In these less polar solvents, the stability of 9 is not sufficient to allow direct characterization by spectroscopic methods, but a kinetic investigation supports the view that stepwise processes are still operating. An informative comparison of our reaction with previous interactions firmly identified as prototype stepwise cycloadditions is made on the basis of the global electrophilicity index, ω, defined by Parr within the density functional theory, and highlighted by Domingo et al. as a powerful tool for understanding Diels–Alder reactions.     

New domino‐reaction for the synthesis of N4‐(5‐aryl‐1,3‐oxathiol‐2‐yliden)‐2‐phenylquinazolin‐4‐amines and 4‐[4‐aryl‐5‐(2‐phenylquinazolin‐4‐yl)‐1,3‐thiazol‐2‐yl]morpholine

The model morpholine‐1‐carbothioic acid (2‐phenyl‐3H‐quinazolin‐4‐ylidene) amide (1) reacts with phenacyl bromides to afford N⁴‐(5‐aryl‐1,3‐oxathiol‐2‐yliden)‐2‐phenylquinazolin‐4‐amines (4) or N⁴‐(4,5‐diphenyl‐1,3‐oxathiol‐2‐yliden)‐2‐phenyl‐4‐aminoquinazoline ( 5 ) by a thermodynamically controlled reversible reaction favoring the enolate intermediate, while the 4‐[4‐aryl‐5‐(2‐phenylquinazolin‐4‐yl)‐1,3‐thiazol‐2‐yl]morpholine ( 8 ) was produced by a kinetically controlled reaction favoring the C‐anion intermediate. ¹H nmr, ¹³C nmr, ir, mass spectroscopy and x‐ray identified compounds ( 4 ), ( 5 ) and ( 8 ).     

3,3′‐Dimesityl‐7‐methyl‐9a‐phenyl‐4,4′,5,5′,6,8,9,9a‐octa­hydro‐7H‐1,2,4‐oxa­diazo­lo­[4,5‐d][1,4]­diazepine‐8‐spiro‐5′‐isoxazole

Condensation of mesito­nitrile oxide with 1,7‐di­methyl‐5‐phenyl‐2,3‐di­hydro‐1H‐1,4‐diazepine leads to two cycloadducts (I) and (II). The structure and stereochemistry of the dicyclo­adduct (II) was established by X‐ray crystallographic analysis.     

A two‐dimensional cadmium(II) coordination polymer constructed from 4‐carboxy‐1‐(4‐carboxylatobenzyl)‐2‐propyl‐1H‐imidazole‐5‐carboxylate and 1‐(4‐carboxylatobenzyl)‐2‐propyl‐1H‐imidazole‐4‐carboxylate ligands

Crystals of poly[[aqua[μ₃‐4‐carboxy‐1‐(4‐carboxylatobenzyl)‐2‐propyl‐1H‐imidazole‐5‐carboxylato‐κ⁵O¹O^1′:N³,O⁴:O⁵][μ₄‐1‐(4‐carboxylatobenzyl)‐2‐propyl‐1H‐imidazole‐4‐carboxylato‐κ⁷N³,O⁴:O⁴,O^4′:O¹,O^1′:O¹]cadmium(II)] monohydrate], {[Cd₂(C₁₅H₁₄N₂O₄)(C₁₆H₁₄N₂O₆)(H₂O)]·H₂O}_n or {[Cd₂(Hcpimda)(cpima)(H₂O)]·H₂O}_n, (I), were obtained from 1‐(4‐carboxybenzyl)‐2‐propyl‐1H‐imidazole‐4,5‐dicarboxylic acid (H₃cpimda) and cadmium(II) chloride under hydrothermal conditions. The structure indicates that in‐situ decarboxylation of H₃cpimda occurred during the synthesis process. The asymmetric unit consists of two Cd²⁺ centres, one 4‐carboxy‐1‐(4‐carboxylatobenzyl)‐2‐propyl‐1H‐imidazole‐5‐carboxylate (Hcpimda²⁻) anion, one 1‐(4‐carboxylatobenzyl)‐2‐propyl‐1H‐imidazole‐4‐carboxylate (cpima²⁻) anion, one coordinated water molecule and one lattice water molecule. One Cd²⁺ centre, i.e. Cd1, is hexacoordinated and displays a slightly distorted octahedral CdN₂O₄ geometry. The other Cd centre, i.e. Cd2, is coordinated by seven O atoms originating from one Hcpimda²⁻ ligand and three cpima²⁻ ligands. This Cd²⁺ centre can be described as having a distorted capped octahedral coordination geometry. Two carboxylate groups of the benzoate moieties of two cpima²⁻ ligands bridge between Cd2 centres to generate [Cd₂O₂] units, which are further linked by two cpima²⁻ ligands to produce one‐dimensional (1D) infinite chains based around large 26‐membered rings. Meanwhile, adjacent Cd1 centres are linked by Hcpimda²⁻ ligands to generate 1D zigzag chains. The two types of chains are linked through a μ₂‐η² bidentate bridging mode from an O atom of an imidazole carboxylate unit of cpima²⁻ to give a two‐dimensional (2D) coordination polymer. The simplified 2D net structure can be described as a 3,6‐coordinated net which has a (4³)₂(4⁶.6⁶.8³) topology. Furthermore, the FT–IR spectroscopic properties, photoluminescence properties, powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern and thermogravimetric behaviour of the polymer have been investigated.     

Synthesis and Heterocyclization of 1‐Aryl‐2‐methyl‐4‐oxo‐1,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyridine‐3‐carboxylates

A series of novel isoxazole, dihydropyrazolone, and tetrahydropyridine derivatives were synthesized by the reaction of corresponding ethyl 1‐substituted aryl‐2‐methyl‐4‐oxo‐1,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyridine‐3‐carboxylates with different hydrazines and hydroxylamine. Reaction of tetrahydropyridone with N ,N‐dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal provided 1‐(5‐chloro‐2‐methylphenyl)‐2‐[2‐(dimethylamino)ethenyl]‐4‐oxo‐1,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyridine‐3‐carboxylate, which was cyclized into a bicyclic compound on treatment with ammonium acetate. The structures of all synthesized compounds were confirmed by IR, ¹H NMR, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy data. The structure of 5‐(5‐chloro‐2‐methylphenyl)‐4‐methyl‐2‐phenyl‐2,5,6,7‐tetrahydro‐3H‐pyrazolo[4,3‐c]pyridin‐3‐one was unambiguously assigned by means of X‐ray analysis data.     

Synthesis of 2‐(sulfamoylphenyl)‐4′‐(iminoaryl/hetroaryl)‐4‐(4′′‐hydroxyphenyl)‐thiazoles and their O‐glucosides

In continuation of our work, we synthesized 2‐(sulfamoylphenyl)‐4′‐amino‐4‐(4″‐hydroxyphenyl)‐thiazole ( 3a ), which were reacted with various (aryl/hetroaryl) aldehyde to form 2‐(sulfamoylphenyl)‐4′‐(iminoaryl/hetroaryl)‐4‐(4″‐hydroxyphenyl)‐thiazoles ( 4a , 4b , 4c , 4d , 4e , 4f ). Glucosylation of compounds ( 4a , 4b , 4c , 4d , 4e , 4f ) have been done by using acetobromoglucose as a glucosyl donor to afford 2‐(sulfamoylphenyl)‐4′‐(iminoaryl/hetroaryl)‐4‐(2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐4″‐O‐β‐D ‐glucosidoxyphenyl)‐thiazoles ( 5a , 5b , 5c , 5d , 5e , 5f ), further on deacetylation to produce 2‐(sulfamoylphenyl)‐4′‐(iminoaryl/hetroaryl)‐4‐(4″‐O‐β‐D ‐glucosidoxyphenyl)‐thiazoles ( 6a , 6b , 6c , 6d , 6e , 6f ). The compounds are confirmed by FTIR, ¹H‐NMR, ¹³C‐NMR, and ES‐Mass spectral analysis. J. Heterocyclic Chem., (2011).     

1,2‐Bis(trifluoromethyl)ethene‐1,2‐dicarbonitrile: Enol Ethers and Ketene Acetals as Cycloaddition Partners

(E)‐ and (Z)‐1,2‐bis(trifluoromethyl)ethene‐1,2‐dicarbonitrile ((E)‐ and (Z)‐BTE, resp., =(E)‐ and (Z)‐2,3‐bis(trifluoromethyl)but‐2‐enedinitrile) were used as a stereochemical probe in studying (2+2) cycloadditions of acceptor with donor alkenes. The additions to methyl (E)‐ and (Z)‐propenyl ether gave rise to the eight conceivable cyclobutanes 8 , although in different ratios in reactions of (E)‐ and (Z)‐BTE. The ¹⁹F‐NMR data served the structural assignment and the quantitative analysis. The mechanistic discussion is based on rotations and ring closures of the assumed 1,4‐zwitterionic intermediates. Dimethylketene dimethyl acetal, methylketene dimethyl acetal, and ketene diethyl acetal show an increasing rate in their reactions with BTE as well as in the equilibration of the cycloadducts.