[Gd(C10H9N2O4)(C10H8N2O4)(H2O)3]2·phen·4H2O的晶体结构和生物活性

在水乙醇混合溶剂中，首次得到了2-羰基丙酸水杨酰腙、1，10-菲啰啉与硝酸钆形成的配合物[Gd(C₁₀H₉N₂O₄)(C₁₀H₈N₂O₄)(H₂O)₃]₂·phen·4H₂O，并测试了其单晶结构。该配合物属三斜晶系，空间群为P-1。每个配合物分子中有两个九配位的钆的结构单元，每个钆离子与两个三齿配体2-羰基丙酸水杨酰腙（分别以负一价和负二价形式）和三个水分子配位。每个钆单元在空间呈扭曲的单帽四方反棱柱。同时还有一个游离的1，10-菲啰啉存在于晶格中，通过氢键与配位水作用。生物活性试验表明该配合物对三种病原菌有一定的抑菌活性。     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of a Novel Supramolecular Compound [Mg(H_2O)_6](C_(16)H_(11)O_4SO_3)_2·10H_2O

IntroductionMolecularpolymerwithonedimensionalormultidimen sionalstructureassemblingthroughhydrogenbondsisanim portantresearchcontentinthesupramolecularchemistryandcrystalenginnering .1,2 Withthedevelopmentofnewtypefunctionalmaterialssuchasmolecularmagnetic ,selectedcatalysis ,reversiblecatalysis ,reversiblehost guestmolecular(ion)exchangeetc.,3themoleculardesignandsynthesishavealreadyattractedconsiderableattentioninsupramolecu larsystem .Thesupramolecularcomplexesandorganiccom poundscontainin…     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure and Thermal Behavior of GZTO·H2O

Guanidimium‐4,4‐azo‐1‐hydro‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐one (GZTO·H₂O) was synthesized from 4‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐one as a starting material by two‐step including oxidation coupling using acid KMnO₄ and reaction with (NH₂)₂CNH·HNO₃ (GN) in KOH solution. The single crystal of the title compound was obtained by slow evaporation method at room temperature, and its structure was firstly determined with X‐ray single‐crystal diffractometer. It is a orthorhombic crystal, space group Pbca with cell dimensions of a=1.0459(2) nm, b=1.3584(3) nm, c=1.6103(3) nm, α=90.00(10)°, β=90.00(11)°, γ=90.00(11)°, V=2.2878(8) nm³, Z=8, D_c=1.587 g·cm⁻³, F(000)=1136, µ=0.132 mm⁻¹, R₁=0.0455, wR₂=0.1397. The thermal behavior of GZTO·H₂O was studied under a non‐isothermal condition by DSC‐TGA method, and its thermal decomposition process can be divided into three stages, and the first stage is an intense exothermic decomposition process. The second stage and the third stage are slow exothermic decomposition processes. The critical temperature of thermal explosion is 237.74°C.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Thermal Properties of the Energetic Coordination Compound [Co(DAT)2(H2O)4](HTNR)2·2H2O (DAT = 1,5‐diaminotetrazole)

A new coordination complex, [Co(DAT)₂(H₂O)₄](HTNR)₂ · 2H₂O [DAT = 1,5‐diaminotetrazole, HTNR = 2,4,6‐trinitroresorcinol (styphnic acid)], was obtained in high yield and characterized by elemental analysis and Fourier‐transform infrared (FT‐IR) spectroscopy. The molecular structure of [Co(DAT)₂(H₂O)₄](HTNR)₂ · 2H₂O in the crystalline state is determined by X‐ray crystallography is as follows: monoclinic, C2/c, a = 19.216(3) Å, b = 5.4992(8) Å, c = 30.418(5) Å, β = 104.500(5), V = 3112.0(8) ų, Z = 4, ρ_calc. = 1.851 g · cm^–3, R₁ = 0.0271 and wR₂ = (all data) 0.0674. The central cobalt(II) cation is coordinated by two nitrogen atoms of two DAT and four oxygen atoms of four H₂O ligand molecules to form a six‐coordinate and slightly distorted octahedral structure. Extensive intermolecular hydrogen bonds link molecular units of [Co(DAT)₂(H₂O)₄(HTNR)₂ · 2H₂O together to form a 3D net structure with pore canals. The thermal decomposition mechanism for the title compound was predicted based on DSC, TG‐DTG, and FT‐IR analyses and non‐kinetic parameters of the first exothermic process were estimated by applying the Kissinger, Starink, and Ozawa–Doyle methods.     

Syntheses,Crystal Structures,and Properties of the Isotypic Pair [Cr(H2O)6]2[B12H12]3·15H2O and [In(H2O)6]2[B12H12]3·15H2O

Single crystals of [Cr(H₂O)₆]₂[B₁₂H₁₂]₃ · 15H₂O and [In(H₂O)₆]₂[B₁₂H₁₂]₃ · 15H₂O were obtained by reactions of aqueous solutions of the acid (H₃O)₂[B₁₂H₁₂] with chromium(III) hydroxide and indium metal shot, respectively. The title compounds crystallize isotypically in the trigonal system with space group R$\bar{3}$ c (a = 1157.62(3), c = 6730.48(9) pm for the chromium, a = 1171.71(3), c = 6740.04(9) pm for the indium compound, Z = 6). The arrangement of the quasi‐icosahedral [B₁₂H₁₂]^2– dianions can be considered as stacking of two times nine layers with the sequence …ABCCABBCA… and the metal trications arrange in a cubic closest packed …abc… stacking sequence. The metal trications are octahedrally coordinated by six water molecules of hydration, while another fifteen H₂O molecules fill up the structures as zeolitic crystal water or second‐sphere hydrating species. Between these free and the metal‐bonded water molecules, bridging hydrogen bonds are found. Furthermore, there is also evidence of hydrogen bonding between the anionic [B₁₂H₁₂]^2– clusters and the free zeolitic water molecules according to B–H^δ– ··· ^δ+H–O interactions. Vibrational spectroscopy studies prove the presence of these hydrogen bonds and also show slight distortions of the dodecahydro‐closo‐dodecaborate anions from their ideal icosahedral symmetry (I_h). Thermal decomposition studies for the example of [Cr(H₂O)₆]₂[B₁₂H₁₂]₃ · 15H₂O gave no hints for just a simple multi‐stepwise dehydration process.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure and Magnetic Properties of a 1‐D Polymer, [Cu(NITpPy)2(H2TCB)(H20)]·2H2O

A novel complex [Cu(NnpPy)₂(H_lTCB)(H₁O)]·2H₂O (NITpPy = 2‐(pyrid‐4′‐yl)‐4,4,5,5‐tetramethyl‐1, 3‐dioxoimidazoline; H₂TCB = 1, 5‐dicarboxybenzene carboxylic‐2, 4‐diacid) has been synthesized and characterized by X‐ray crystallography analysis. The crystal structure consists of infinite chains of Cu‐(NITpPy)₂(H₂O) units linked by H₂TCB ligands. The complex crystallizes in triclinic system with space group PI. Crystal data: a = 1.0594(2) nm, b = 1.3830(3) nm, c = 1.5551(3) nm, a = 67.75(3)°, β = 89.83(3)°, γ = 70.54(3)°. The variable magnetic susceptibility studies lead to magnetic coupling constant values of J₁= ?11.18 cm‐¹ (Cu—Rad) and J₂ = ?4.06 cm^?1 (Cu—Cu).     

11‐Vertex arachno‐Clusters with an NB10, SNB9, and SeNB9 Skeleton

One of the two bridging protons of the aza‐nido‐decaboranes RNB₉H₁₀X can be removed by certain bases to give nido‐anions [RNB₉H₉X]^– [R/X = H/H ( 1 a ), Ph/H ( 1 b ), p‐MeC₆H₄/H ( 1 c ), Bzl/H ( 1 d ), H/N₃ ( 1 ′ a )]; the stericly demanding base 1,8‐bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene (“proton sponge”, ps) is ideal. In the case of tBu anion, the deprotonation (→ C₄H₁₀) may be accompanied by a hydridation (→ C₄H₈), yielding the arachno‐anions [RNB₉H₁₁X]^– ( 2 a , b , d , 2 ′ a ); these are the main products, when stericly non‐demanding bases like H^– are applied. The Lewis acid BH₃ is added to 1 a and 1 ′ a to give the aza‐arachno‐undecaborates HNB₁₀H₁₂X [X = H ( 3 a ), N₃ (in position 2) ( 3 ′ a )]. Thia‐ and selenaaza‐arachno‐undecaborates, [S(RN)B₉H₁₀]^– ( 4 b , c ) and [Se(RN)B₉H₁₀]^– ( 4 ′ b , c ), are obtained from 1 b , c by the addition of sulfur or selenium, respectively. The methylation of the anions 4 c and 4 ′ c gives the thia‐ and selenaazaarachno‐undecaboranes (MeS)(RN)B₉H₁₀ ( 5 c ) and (MeSe)(RN)B₉H₁₀ ( 5 ′ c ), respectively. The action of HBF₄ on the arachno‐borates [HNB₁₀H₁₂X]^– ( 3 a , 3 ′ a ) leads to a mixture of nido‐HNB₉H₁₀X and nido‐HNB₁₀H₁₁X by the elimination of BH₃ or H₂, respectively; the aza‐nido‐decaborane predominates in the case of 3 ′ a and the aza‐nido‐undecaborane in the case of 3 a . The action of HBF₄ on the anion 4 c yields the hypho‐undecaborate [S(RN)B₉H₁₀F₂]^– ( 6 c ). The structures of the products are elucidated on the basis of ¹H and ¹¹B NMR spectra, supported by 2D COSY and HMQC techniques. Two types of 11‐vertex‐arachno structures and an 11‐vertex‐hypho structure are found for the products. The crystal structures of 5 c and [Hps] 6 c · CH₂Cl₂ are reported.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of the Binuclear Complex [Pr2(C10H8N2O4)2(C10H9N2O4)2(H2O)4]·3H2O·C6H6

The binuclear praseodymium(III) complex with N‐(1‐carboxyethylidene)‐salicylhydrazide (C₁₀H₁₀N₂O₄, H₂L) was prepared in H₂O‐C₂H₅OH mixed solution, and the crystal structure of [Pr₂L₂(HL)₂(H₂O)₄]·3H₂O·C₆H₆ was determined by X‐ray single crystal diffraction. The crystal complex crystallizes in the triclinic system with space group P‐1, and in the structure each Pr atom is 9‐coordinated by carboxyl O and acyl O and azomethine N atoms of two tridentate ligands to form two stable five‐membered rings sharing one side in keto‐mode and two water molecules. The coordination polyhedron around Pr³⁺ was described as a monocapped square antiprism geometry. In an individual molecule, four tridentate ligands were coordinated by two negative univalent (HL) and two bivalent forms (L) respectively. Two negative univalent ligands were coordinated via μ₂‐bridging mode.     

Influence of the Organic Species and Oxoanion in the Synthesis of two Uranyl Sulfate Hydrates, (H3O)2[(UO2)2(SO4)3­(H2O)]·7H2O and (H3O)2[(UO2)2(SO4)3(H2O)]·4H2O,and a Uranyl Selenate‐Selenite [C5H6N][(UO2)(SeO4)(HSeO3)]

Two uranyl sulfate hydrates, (H₃O)₂[(UO₂)₂(SO₄)₃(H₂O)] · 7H₂O (NDUS) and (H₃O)₂[(UO₂)₂(SO₄)₃(H₂O)] · 4H₂O (NDUS1), and one uranyl selenate‐selenite [C₅H₆N][(UO₂)(SeO₄)(HSeO₃)] (NDUSe), were obtained and their crystal structures solved. NDUS and NDUSe result from reactions in highly acidic media in the presence of L ‐cystine at 373 K. NDUS crystallized in a closed vial at 278 K after 5 days and NDUSe in an open beaker at 278 K after 2 weeks. NDUS1 was synthesized from aqueous solution at room temperature over the course of a month. NDUS, NDUS1, and NDUSe crystallize in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n, a = 15.0249(4) Å,b = 9.9320(2) Å, c = 15.6518(4) Å, β = 112.778(1)°, V = 2153.52(9) ų,Z = 4, the tetragonal space group P4₃2₁2, a = 10.6111(2) Å,c = 31.644(1) Å, V = 3563.0(2) ų, Z = 8, and in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n, a = 8.993(3) Å, b = 13.399(5) Å, c = 10.640(4) Å,β = 108.230(4)°, V = 1217.7(8) ų, Z = 4, respectively.The structural units of NDUS and NDUS1 are two‐dimensional uranyl sulfate sheets with a U/S ratio of 2/3. The structural unit of NDUSe is a two‐dimensional uranyl selenate‐selenite sheets with a U/Se ratio of 1/2. In‐situ reaction of the L ‐cystine ligands gives two distinct products for the different acids used here. Where sulfuric acid is used, only H₃O⁺ cations are located in the interlayer space, where they balance the charge of the sheets, whereas where selenic acid is used, interlayer C₅H₆N⁺ cations result from the cyclization of the carboxyl groups of L ‐cystine, balancing the charge of the sheets.     

Crystallographic report: {[Zn(O2CC6H4NO2‐m)(1,10‐phenanthroline)2] O2CC6H4NO2‐m}·2H2O·HO2CC6H4NO2‐m

The structure of {[Zn(O₂CC₆H₄NO₂‐m)(1,10‐phenanthroline)₂]O₂CC₆H₄NO₂‐m}·2H₂O·HO₂CC₆H₄NO₂‐m features chelating m‐nitrobenzoate and 1,10‐phenanthroline ligands so that a distorted octahedron N₄O₂ coordination geometry results. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Facile synthesis of pyridinium aryltetrachlorotellurates: crystal and molecular structure of [C5H6N][RTeCl4] (R = m‐O2NC6H4, p‐NCC6H4)

Arylation of TeCl₄ with arylboroxine–pyridine complexes [(RBO)₃·C₅H₅N, where R = m‐O₂NC₆H₄ ( 1 ), p‐O₂NC₆H₄ ( 2 ), m‐NCC₆H₄ ( 3 ), p‐NCC₆H₄ ( 4 )] and advantageous moisture provided good yields of the pyridinium aryltetrachlorotellurates [C₅H₆N][RTeCl₄] [R = m‐O₂NC₆H₄ ( 5 ), p‐O₂NC₆H₄ ( 6 ), m‐NCC₆H₄ ( 7 ), p‐NCC₆H₄ ( 8 )]. Compounds 5 and 8 have been investigated by X‐ray crystallography. Key features of both crystal structures are intermolecular secondary Te???Cl interactions between the aryltetrachlorotellurate anions and weak association of the cations and anions. Electrospray mass spectra of compound 5 reveal that the associative interactions also play a role in solution. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Preparation,Structure, and Second‐order Nonlinear Optical Properties of a Borate‐Carboxylic Acid Compound: NH4B[d‐(+)‐C4H4O5]2·H2O

The organic‐inorganic hybrid nonlinear optical (NLO) material NH₄B(d‐ (+)‐C₄H₄O₅)₂ · H₂O (NBC) was synthesized in a borate‐carboxylic acid system. Its structure was determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. It crystallizes in the orthorhombic system, space group Pna2₁ (No. 33), with cell parameters a = 11.484(6) Å, b = 5.354(3) Å, c = 21.079(12) Å, V = 1296.0(12), Z = 4. It exhibits a three‐dimensional pseudo tunnel structure consisting of fundamental building block [B(d‐ (+)‐C₄H₄O₅)₂]^– anions. The small cavities are occupied by the H₂O molecules and NH₄⁺ cations, which stabilize the whole structure by O–H ··· O and N–H ··· O hydrogen bonds. The powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) of the crystal was also recorded. Elemental analyses, FT‐IR and FT‐Raman spectra analyses, thermal analysis, and diffuse‐reflectance spectra for the compound are also presented, as are band structures and density of states calculation. Nonlinear optical measurements indicate that the material has second harmonic generation (SHG) properties and is phase‐matchable.     

Synthesis of 4‐Aryl‐4,6‐dihydropyrimido[4,5‐d]pyridazine‐2,5(1H,3H)‐diones from Biginelli Compounds

Biginelli compounds 1 were first brominated at Me? C(6) with 2,4,4,6‐tetrabromocyclohex‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one to give Br₂CH? C(6) derivatives 2 . The hydrolysis of the 6‐(dibromomethyl) group of 2c to give the 6‐formyl derivative 3c in the presence of an expensive Ag salt followed by reaction with N₂H₄?H₂O yielded tetrahydropyrimido[4,5‐d]pyridazine‐2,5(1H,3H)‐dione ( 4c ; Scheme 1). However, treatment of the 6‐(dibromomethyl) derivatives 2 directly with N₂H₄?H₂O led to the fused heterocycles 4 in better overall yield (Schemes 1 and 2; Table).     

A Gadolinium Complex of the 5‐(1H‐Tetrazol‐5‐yl)isophthalic Acid Ligand: [Gd(C9H3N4O4)(H2O)3·2H2O]n

The reaction of Gd(ClO₄)₃·6H₂O with 5‐(1H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl)isophthalic acid affords a 3D framework gadolinium coordination polymer, [Gd(C₉H₃N₄O₄)(H₂O)₃·2H₂O]_n ( 1 ). Its crystal structure belongs to a triclinic system, space group , with a = 7.909(2) Å; b = 8.448(2) Å; c = 10.994(2) Å; α = 102.65(3)°; β = 124.32(2)°; γ = 96.28(3)°; V = 704.5(2) ų; Z = 2; R₁ = 0.0245 for 3225 reflections with I >2σ(I), wR₂ = 0.0556. Fluorescent analyses show that compound 1 exhibits purple fluorescence in the solid state at room temperature.     

Kristallstruktur von Natrium‐Dihydrogencyamelurat‐Tetrahydrat Na[H2(C6N7)O3] · 4 H2O

Crystal Structure of Sodium Dihydrogencyamelurate Tetrahydrate Na[H₂(C₆N₇)O₃] · 4 H₂O Sodium dihydrogencyamelurate‐tetrahydrate Na[H₂(C₆N₇)O₃]·4 H₂O was obtained by neutralisation of an aqueous solution, previously prepared by hydrolysis of the polymer melon with sodium hydroxide. The crystal structure was solved by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction ( a = 6.6345(13), b = 8.7107(17), c = 11.632(2) Å, α = 68.96(3), β = 87.57(3), γ = 68.24(3)°, V = 579.5(2) ų, Z = 2, R1 = 0.0535, 2095 observed reflections, 230 parameters). Both hydrogen atoms of the dihydrogencyamelurate anion are directly bound to nitrogen atoms of the cyameluric nucleus, thus proving the preference of the keto‐tautomere in salts of cyameluric acid in the solid‐state. The compound forms a layer‐like structure with an extensive hydrogen bonding network.     

Das erste Oxatetraphospholan, (PBut)4O

Contributions to the Chemistry of Phosphorus. 244. The First Oxatetraphospholane, (PBu^t)₄O Under suitable conditions, the reaction ot tri‐tertbutylcyclotriphosphane, (PBu^t)₃, with di‐tert‐butylperoxide gives rise to a mixture of 2,3,4,5‐tetra‐tert‐butyl‐1,2,3,4,5‐oxatetraphospholane, (PBu^t)₄O ( 1 ), and 1,2‐di‐tert‐butyl‐1,2‐di‐tert‐butoxidiphosphane, [Bu^t(Bu^tO)P]₂ ( 2 ). Both compounds have been isolated in the pure state. The oxatetraphospholane 1 is a constitutional isomer of 1,2,3,4‐Tetra‐tert‐butyl‐1‐oxocyclotetraphosphane, which has been reported recently [1]. The corresponding reaction of tetra‐tert‐butylcyclotetraphosphane furnishes only small amounts of 1 because of the kinetic stability of (PBu^t)₄. The diphosphane 2 is presumably a secondary product of primarily formed oxocyclotetraphosphanes (PBu^t)₄O_1–4. The NMR parameters of 1 and 2 are reported and discussed.     

2, 4‐Dimethylpenta‐1, 3‐dien‐ und 2, 4‐Dimethylpentadienyl‐Komplexe des Rhodiums und Iridiums

2, 4‐Dimethylpenta‐1, 3‐diene and 2, 4‐Dimethylpentadienyl Complexes of Rhodium and Iridium The complexes [(η⁴‐C₇H₁₂)RhCl]₂ ( 1 ) (C₇H₁₂ = 2, 4‐dimethylpenta‐1, 3‐diene) and [(η⁴‐C₇H₁₂)₂IrCl] ( 2 ) were obtained by interaction of C₇H₁₂ with [(η²‐C₂H₄)₂RhCl]₂ and [(η²‐cyclooctene)₂IrCl]₂, respectively. The reaction of 1 or 2 with CpTl (Cp = η⁵‐C₅H₅) yields the compounds [CpM(η⁴‐C₇H₁₂)] ( 3a : M = Rh; 3b : M = Ir). The hydride abstraction at the pentadiene ligand of 3a , b with Ph₃CBF₄ proceeds differently depending on the solvent. In acetone or THF the “half‐open” metallocenium complexes [CpM(η⁵‐C₇H₁₁)]BF₄ ( 4a : M = Rh; 4b : M = Ir) are obtained exclusively. In dichloromethane mixtures are produced which additionally contain the species [(η⁵‐C₇H₁₁)M(η⁵‐C₅H₄CPh₃)]BF₄ ( 5a : M = Rh; 5b : M = Ir) formed by electrophilic substitution at the Cp ring, as well as the η³‐2, 4‐dimethylpentenyl compound [(η³‐C₇H₁₃)Rh{η⁵‐C₅H₃(CPh₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 6 ). By interaction of 2, 4‐dimethylpentadienyl potassium with 1 or 2 the complexes [(η⁴‐C₇H₁₂)M(η⁵‐C₇H₁₁)] ( 7a : M = Rh; 7b : M = Ir) are generated which show dynamic behaviour in solution; however, attempts to synthesize the “open” metallocenium cations [(η⁵‐C₇H₁₁)₂M]⁺ by hydride abstraction from 7a , b failed. The new compounds were characterized by elemental analysis and spectroscopically, 4b and 5a also by X‐ray structure analysis.     

6‐Propyl‐2‐thiouracil versus 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil: enhancing the hydrogen‐bonded synthon motif by replacement of a methylene group with an O atom

The understanding of intermolecular interactions is a key objective of crystal engineering in order to exploit the derived knowledge for the rational design of new molecular solids with tailored physical and chemical properties. The tools and theories of crystal engineering are indispensable for the rational design of (pharmaceutical) cocrystals. The results of cocrystallization experiments of the antithyroid drug 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil (PTU) with 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine (DAPY), and of 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil (MOMTU) with DAPY and 2,4,6‐triaminopyrimidine (TAPY), respectively, are reported. PTU and MOMTU show a high structural similarity and differ only in the replacement of a methylene group (–CH₂–) with an O atom in the side chain, thus introducing an additional hydrogen‐bond acceptor in MOMTU. Both molecules contain an ADA hydrogen‐bonding site (A = acceptor and D = donor), while the coformers DAPY and TAPY both show complementary DAD sites and therefore should be capable of forming a mixed ADA/DAD synthon with each other, i.e. N—H…O, N—H…N and N—H…S hydrogen bonds. The experiments yielded one solvated cocrystal salt of PTU with DAPY, four different solvates of MOMTU, one ionic cocrystal of MOMTU with DAPY and one cocrystal salt of MOMTU with TAPY, namely 2,4‐diaminopyrimidinium 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracilate–2,4‐diaminopyrimidine–N,N‐dimethylacetamide–water (1/1/1/1) (the systematic name for 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracilate is 6‐oxo‐4‐propyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐1‐ide), C₄H₇N₄⁺·C₇H₉N₂OS⁻·C₄H₆N₄·C₄H₉NO·H₂O, (I), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–N,N‐dimethylformamide (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₃H₇NO, (II), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–N,N‐dimethylacetamide (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₄H₉NO, (III), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–dimethyl sulfoxide (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₂H₆OS, (IV), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–1‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₅H₉NO, (V), 2,4‐diaminopyrimidinium 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracilate (the systematic name for 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracilate is 4‐methoxymethyl‐6‐oxo‐2‐sulfanylidene‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐1‐ide), C₄H₇N₄⁺·C₆H₇N₂O₂S⁻, (VI), and 2,4,6‐triaminopyrimidinium 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracilate–6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil (1/1), C₄H₈N₅⁺·C₆H₇N₂O₂S⁻·C₆H₈N₂O₂S, (VII). Whereas in (I) only an AA/DD hydrogen‐bonding interaction was formed, the structures of (VI) and (VII) both display the desired ADA/DAD synthon. Conformational studies on the side chains of PTU and MOMTU also revealed a significant deviation for cocrystals (VI) and (VII), leading to the desired enhancement of the hydrogen‐bond pattern within the crystal.     

New Borate‐citrate: Synthesis,Structure, and Properties of Sr[B(C6H5O7)2](H2O)4·3H2O

Single crystals of Sr[B(C₆H₅O₇)₂](H₂O)₄ · 3H₂O, a new borate‐citrate material, were grown with sizes up to 8 × 6 × 2 mm by slow evaporation of water at room temperature. The structure of Sr[B(C₆H₅O₇)₂](H₂O)₄ · 3H₂O was determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. It crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c, with a = 11.363(3) Å, b = 18.829(4) Å, c = 11.976(3) Å, β = 110.736(3)°, and Z = 4. The SrO₈ dodecahedra, BO₄ tetrahedra and citrate groups are linked together to form chains. The compound was characterized by IR and UV/Vis/NIR transmittance spectroscopy as well as thermal analysis.     

Synthesis,Structural Characterization and Thermal Stability of [Mn(3‐bpd)2(NCS)2(H2O)2]·2H2O (1) and {[Mn(bpe)(NCS)2(H2O)2]·(3‐bpd)·(bpe)·H2O}n (2) from One‐Pot Crystallization

Two supramolecular architectures, [Mn(3‐bpd)₂(NCS)₂(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O ( 1 ) and {[Mn(bpe)(NCS)₂(H₂O)₂]·(3‐bpd)·(bpe)·H₂O}_n ( 2 ) [bpe = 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethylene and 3‐bpd = 1,4‐bis(3‐pyridyl)‐2,3‐diaza‐1,3‐butadiene] have been synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic, elemental and single crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses. Compound 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P2₁/c, with chemical formula C₂₆H₂₈Mn N₁₀O₄S₂, a = 9.1360(6), b = 9.7490(6), c = 17.776(1) Å, β = 93.212(1)°, and Z = 2 while compound 2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic system, space group P2₁2₁2₁, with chemical formula C₃₈H₃₆Mn₁N₁₀O₃S₂, a = 14.1902(6), b = 15.4569(7), c = 18.2838(8) Å, α = β = γ = 90°, and Z = 4. Structural determination reveals that the coordination geometry at Mn(II) in compound 1 or 2 is a distorted octahedral which consists of two nitrogen donors of two NCS^?ligands, two oxygen donors of two water molecules, and two nitrogen donors of two 3‐bpd ligands for 1 and two dpe ligands for 2 , respectively. The two 3‐bpd ligands in 1 adopt a monodentate binding mode and the dpe in 2 adopts a bismonodentate bridging mode to connect the Mn(II) ions forming a 1D chain‐like coordination polymer. Both the π‐π stacking interactions between the coordinated and the free pyridyl‐based ligands and intermolecular hydrogen bonds among the coordinated and the crystallized water molecules and the free pyridyl‐based ligands play an important role in construction of these 3D supramolecular architectures.