A Relational Perspective on Issues of Cultural Diversity and Equity as They Play Out in the Mathematics Classroom

In this article, we present a relational perspective in which cultural diversity is viewed as a relation between people's participation in the practices of different communities. In the case at hand, the relevant practices were those of students' local, home communities, and the broader communities to which they belonged in wider society on the one hand and the specifically mathematical practices established by the classroom community on the other hand. In the 1st part of the article, we discuss how we might characterize the practices of these various communities by drawing on Wenger's (1998) notion of a community of practice and on Gee's (1997) notion of a Discourse. In doing so, we question the manner in which students are frequently classified exclusively in terms of the standard categories of race and ethnicity in investigations of equity in mathematics education. Later in the article, we clarify that in addition to focusing on the continuities and contrasts between the practices of different communities, the relational perspective also encompasses issues of both power and identity. As we illustrate, the gatekeeping role that mathematics plays in students' access to educational and economic opportunities is not limited to differences in the ways of knowing associated with participation in the practices of different communities. Instead, it also includes difficulties that students experience in reconciling their views of themselves and who they want to become with the identities that they are invited to construct in the mathematics classroom.     

A Relational Perspective on Issues of Cultural Diversity and Equity as They Play Out in the Mathematics Classroom

In this article, we present a relational perspective in which cultural diversity is viewed as a relation between people's participation in the practices of different communities. In the case at hand, the relevant practices were those of students' local, home communities, and the broader communities to which they belonged in wider society on the one hand and the specifically mathematical practices established by the classroom community on the other hand. In the 1st part of the article, we discuss how we might characterize the practices of these various communities by drawing on Wenger's (1998) notion of a community of practice and on Gee's (1997) notion of a Discourse. In doing so, we question the manner in which students are frequently classified exclusively in terms of the standard categories of race and ethnicity in investigations of equity in mathematics education. Later in the article, we clarify that in addition to focusing on the continuities and contrasts between the practices of different communities, the relational perspective also encompasses issues of both power and identity. As we illustrate, the gatekeeping role that mathematics plays in students' access to educational and economic opportunities is not limited to differences in the ways of knowing associated with participation in the practices of different communities. Instead, it also includes difficulties that students experience in reconciling their views of themselves and who they want to become with the identities that they are invited to construct in the mathematics classroom.     

A Vision Educators Can Put Into Practice: Portraying the Constructivist Classroom as a Cultural System

Constructivist perspectives on learning have helped math and science educators better understand how students make sense of their experiences. Unfortunately, the intuitively appealing explanations of how learners construct knowledge have not been translated into a systematic body of pedagogical methods or a coherent curricular approach. Constructivist teaching is often portrayed in the literature as an alternative to traditional instructional approaches or as a toolbox of pedagogical techniques. These incomplete images do little to help practitioners understand constructivism or how it should be integrated into the life of the classroom. There may, however, be help for teachers in conceptualizing constructivism as a foundation for classroom practice. Recent anthropological investigations of learning have directed attention to the culture of classroom environments and the characteristic norms, beliefs, and practices that participants share in their dealings with one another. This article contends that envisioning the classroom as an articulated system of beliefs and practices not only serves an explanatory function for learning theorists but, more importantly, serves as a heuristic for teachers in conceptualizing constructivism and offers a starting point for teachers in implementing constructivist practices.     

Sociocultural perspectives in research on and with mathematics teachers: a zone theory approach

Sociocultural theories view teacher learning as changing participation in social practices that develop their professional identities rather than as acquisition of new knowledge or beliefs that are internal to the individual. Although sociocultural research on mathematics teacher education has tended to focus on understanding teachers’ learning, this article argues that sociocultural perspectives can also guide more interventionist research involving changing classroom practice. The approach illustrated here uses an adaptation of Valsiner’s zone theory to analyse teacher learning and development in two separate research studies. In one study the aim was to understand how teachers incorporated digital technologies into their practice, while the other study helped teachers implement an investigative approach to working mathematically consistent with a new syllabus. In both studies, productive tensions between teachers’ beliefs, contexts, and goals were a trigger for learning and development.     

Teachers' Considerations of Students' Thinking During Mathematics Lesson Design

Teachers' abilities to design mathematics lessons are related to their capability to mobilize resources to meeting intended learning goals based on their noticing. In this process, knowing how teachers consider Students' thinking is important for understanding how they are making decisions to promote student learning. While teaching, what teachers notice influences their decision‐making process. This article explores the mathematics lesson planning practices of four 4th‐grade teachers at the same school to understand how their consideration of Students' learning influences planning decisions. Case study methodology was used to gain an in‐depth perspective of the mathematics planning practices of the teachers. Results indicate the teachers took varying approaches in how they considered students. One teacher adapted instruction based on Students' conceptual understanding, two teachers aimed at producing skill‐efficient students, and the final teacher regulated learning with a strict adherence to daily lessons in curriculum materials, with little emphasis on student understanding. These findings highlight the importance of providing professional development support to teachers focused on their noticing and considerations of Students' mathematical understandings as related to learning outcomes. These findings are distinguished from other studies because of the focus on how teachers consider Students' thinking during lesson planning. This article features a Research to Practice Companion Article . Please click on the supporting information link below to access.     

Classroom interactions that shape the nature of students’ appropriation of a complex mathematical practice

Scholars continue to emphasize the importance of fostering proficiency with mathematical practices as an educational outcome. As teachers attempt to support students in developing these practices, they communicate subtle messages about their nature. However, researchers lack a detailed understanding of the classroom interactions that communicate these messages. To begin to address this gap in the literature, we investigated the relationship between the types of classroom interactions around the mathematical practice of imposing structure and the ways students subsequently engaged in that practice. This led to the identification of three types of classroom interactions that shaped the nature of students’ appropriation of imposing structure: (a) engaging students in the practice, (b) providing different representations of the practice, and (c) reflecting on different instantiations of the practice. Our examination of the nature of these interactions suggests teachers must attend to details as they support students to appropriate mathematical practices in formal learning environments.     

An Ethnoscience Approach to Curriculum Issues for American Indian Students

This paper describes a course offered to teachers of American Indian students, which focused on the development of culturally relevant activities as part of the science and mathematics curricula. In response to the concern that American Indian students do not find meaning in the curriculum, these activities were embedded in a holistic approach to the curriculum, and the informal science and mathematics of the culture were linked with the traditional school science and mathematics. Informal results suggest that the development of these connections will help American Indian students make sense of what they are learning, both in the context of the culture and in the context of school science and mathematics.     

An “inverse” relationship between mathematics identities and classroom practices among early career elementary teachers: The impact of accountability

This qualitative case study guided by portraiture examines the relationships between three early career elementary teachers’ beliefs about themselves in relation to mathematics (mathematics identities) and their classroom practices. Through autobiographical inquiry, reflective practice, classroom observations, interviews, and artifacts, findings show that all three second grade teachers appeared to have an “inverse” relationship between their mathematics identities and their classroom practices. In this relationship, as negative as they felt about themselves with regards to mathematics, they expended that much more effort to ensure that their students would have positive experiences with it and not be stigmatized by it as they had been. Accountability to schools, students, and parents, to increase student achievement appeared to play an important role in this relationship. Implications for preservice teacher education, inservice professional development, and research on beliefs and practices are discussed.     

A socio-political look at equity in the school organization of mathematics education

This paper presents some theoretical tools to help understand the meaning of mathematics education as socio-political practices and the implications of these for researching mathematics education. Taking two cases of schools and students in Denmark and South Africa, the paper illustrates how the theoretical and methodological ideas come into operation when illuminating issues of equity. It is contended that the disadvantaged positioning of some students for participating in mathematics teaching and learning is the result of the routines, ideas, shared meanings, and ways of talking and conceiving mathematics education among the actors in the school organization, inside as well as outside the classroom.     

Research, practice, uncertainty and responsibility

Three issues concerning the relationship between research and practice are addressed. (1) A certain ‘prototype mathematics classroom’ seems to dominate the research field, which in many cases seems selective with respect to what practices to address. I suggest challenging the dominance of the discourse created around the prototype mathematics classroom. (2) I find it important to broaden the school-centred discourse on mathematics education and to address the very different out-of-school practices that include mathematics. Many of these practices are relevant for interpreting what is taking place in a school context. That brings us to (3) socio-political issues of mathematics education. When the different school-sites for learning mathematics as well as the many different practices that include mathematics are related, we enter the socio-political dimension of mathematics education.On the one hand we must consider questions like: Could socio-political discrimination be acted out through mathematics education? Could mathematics education exercise a regimentation and disciplining of students? Could it include discrimination in terms of language? Could it include sexism and racism? On the other hand: Could mathematics education bring about competencies which can be described as empowering, and as supporting the development of mathematical literary or a ‘mathemacy’, important for the development of critical citizenship?However, there is no hope for identifying a one-way route to mathemacy. More generally: There is no simple way of identifying the socio-political functions of mathematics education. Mathematics education has to face uncertainty, and this challenge brings us to the notion of responsibility.     

Mathematics Learning and Participation as Racialized Forms of Experience: African American Parents Speak on the Struggle for Mathematics Literacy

This article draws on 3 ethnographic and participant observation studies of African American parents and adults from 3 northern California communities. Although studies have shown that African American parents hold the same folk theories about mathematics as other parents, stressing it as an important school subject, few studies have sought to directly examine their beliefs about constraints and opportunities associated with mathematics learning for both themselves and their children. I argue that, as they situate the struggle for mathematical literacy within the larger contexts of African American, political, socioeconomic, and educational struggle, these parents help reveal that mathematics learning and participation can be conceptualized as racialized forms of experience. As they attempt to become doers of mathematics and advocates for their children's mathematics learning, discriminatory experiences have continued to subjugate some of these parents, whereas others—as demonstrated in their oppositional voices and behaviors—resisted their continued subjugation based on a belief that mathematics knowledge, beyond its role in schools, can be used to change the conditions of their lives. The characterization of mathematics learning as racialized experience put forth in this article contrasts with culture-free and situated perspectives of mathematics learning often found in the literature. As a result of their experiences with oppression in this society, the concept of race has historically played a major role in the lives of African Americans. Although race has dubious value as a scientific classification system, it has had real consequences for the life experiences and life opportunities of African Americans in the United States. Race is a socially constructed concept which is [a] defining characteristic for African American group membership. (Sellers, Smith, Shelton, Rowley, & Chavous, 1998, p. 18)     

How students use the ‘see similar example’ feature in online mathematics homework

Homework is one of students’ opportunities to learn mathematics, but we know little about what students learn from homework. This study employs the instructional triangle and didactic contract to explore how students used the ‘see similar example’ feature in an online homework platform and how that use reflected their learning goals. Findings indicate students used similar examples to troubleshoot, to check if they were on the right track, and to see the form of the answer. Students also sought to unpack the reasoning in solution steps, used solutions as templates for solving their own problems, and sometimes copied answers. One student did a ‘see similar example’ problem for more practice. Students’ goals included completing the homework, maximizing their score, and understanding the content. This research lays groundwork for future work characterizing what students learn from homework and how features that provide students with similar examples help or hinder their learning.     

How students interpret and enact inquiry-oriented defining practices in undergraduate real analysis

This study investigates the influence of inquiry-oriented real analysis instruction on students’ conceptions of the situation of mathematical defining. I assess the claim that inquiry-oriented instruction helps acculturate students into advanced mathematical practice. The instruction observed was “inquiry-oriented” in the sense that they treated definitions as under construction. The professor invited students to create and assess mathematical definitions and students sometimes articulated key mathematical content before the instructor. I characterize students’ conceptions of the defining situation as their (1) frames for the classroom activity, (2) perceived role in that activity, and (3) values for classroom defining. I identify four archetypal categories of students’ conceptions. All participants in the study valued classroom defining because it helped them understand and recall definitions. However, students in only two categories showed strong acculturation to mathematical practice, which I measure by the students’ expression of meta-mathematical values for defining or by their bearing mathematical authority.     

Teachers in transition: Moving towards CAS-supported classrooms

In the near future many teachers may be required to incorporate CAS into their teaching practices. Based on classroom observations and interviews over two years, this paper reports how two teachers made the transition from using graphics calculators to CAS calculators while teaching differential calculus to upper secondary school students. Both teachers taught with CAS in ways that were consistent with their beliefs about learning and teaching. Over two years, the teachers' teaching approaches and purpose for use of technology were stable and seemed to be underpinned by their beliefs about learning. In contrast, both teachers made changes to the content they taught (and thus what they used technology for) in response to new institutional knowledge. Content choice seemed to be underpinned by the teachers' purpose for teaching. Other influences impacted on what the teachers taught and how they taught it: the teachers' content knowledge, their pedagogical content knowledge, and the lack of legitimacy of CAS as a tool for learning and during examinations in the trial school and wider educational community. The extent of differences noted between the responses of just two teachers indicates that there will be many responses to using CAS in classrooms, as teachers aim to achieve different learning goals and interpret their responsibilities to students in different ways.     

Multi‐Year Professional Development Grounded in Educative Curriculum Focused on Integrating Technology With Reformed Science Teaching Principles

Visions of science teaching and learning in the newest U.S. standards documents are dramatically different than those found in most classrooms. This research addresses these differences through closely examining one professional development (PD) project that connects teacher learning and teacher practice with student learning/achievement. This study examines the effects on eighth grade science teachers and their students in the context of a PD focused on the integration of information communication technologies and reformed science teaching practices. Findings from this investigation suggest that teachers who participated in PD for two years learned more about technology, improved their practice, and their students’ achievement was significantly higher compared to teachers who participated in one year of the PD or non‐participating peers. Science educators face multiple challenges as they attempt to deliver instruction in fundamentally different ways than what they experienced as learners. The delivery of this professional learning suggest that PD for science teachers should include educative learning experiences if understandings of reforms supported by research are to be realized.     

Debugging an Artifact, Instrumenting a Bug: Dialectics of Instrumentation and Design in Technology-Rich Learning Environments

This article explores ways of conceptualizing the design of innovative learning tools as emergent from dialectics between designers and learner-users of those tools. More specifically, I focus on the reciprocities between a designer’s objectives for student learning and a user’s situated activity in a learning environment, as these interact and co-develop in cycles of design-based research. Recent investigations of technology-supported mathematics learning conducted from an ‘instrumental’ perspective provide a powerful framework for analyzing the process through which classroom artifacts become conceptual tools, simultaneously characterizing the ways students come to both implement and understand a device in the context of a task. Similarly, design-based approaches to investigating instructional activity offer epistemological grounds for treating the process of designing artifacts to support learning as unfolding in concert with rather than concluding prior to situated student use. Drawing on each of these perspectives, I describe the design and initial implementation of a set of software artifacts intended to support students’ collaborative problem solving through locally networked handheld computers. Through detailed analyses of three classroom episodes, I report on the ways one student group’s innovative and unexpected use of these tools served as an opportunity to both examine student learning in the context of that novelty and to refine the software design. This account provides an empirical example through which to consider the potential for instrumental genesis to inform design, and for design research epistemology to broaden the scope of instrumental theory.

Teachers' ways of listening and responding to students' emerging mathematical models

In this paper, I present the results of a case study of the practices of four experienced secondary teachers as they engaged their students in the initial development of mathematical models for exponential growth. The study focuses on two related aspects of their practices: (a) when, how and to what extent they saw and interpreted students' ways of thinking about exponential functions and (b) how they responded to the students' thinking in their classroom practice. Through an analysis of the teachers' actions in the classroom, I describe the teachers' developing knowledge when using modeling tasks with secondary students. The analysis suggests that there is considerable variation in the approaches that teachers take in listening to and responding to students' emerging mathematical models. Having a well-developed schema for how students might approach the task enabled one teacher to press students to express, evaluate, and revise their emerging models of exponential growth. Implications for the knowledge needed to teach mathematics through modeling are discussed.     

Learning Trajectories,Lesson Planning,Affordances, and Constraints in the Design and Enactment of Mathematics Teaching

Recent reform efforts in mathematics education have stimulated a focus on learning trajectories. At the same time, a global increase in high-stakes testing has influenced instructional practices. This study investigated how four fourth grade teachers within a school planned and enacted lessons to understand what mediated their planning and teaching decisions. Findings reveal that three of these teachers, who were veteran teachers, used a testing trajectory approach with decisions mediated by preparing students for high-stakes tests. The fourth teacher, a novice, attempted to use a learning trajectory approach to support student understanding. Results reveal that high-stakes testing played a crucial role in teachers' instructional decisions. Based on the findings, we provide a framework for a testing trajectory approach that the veteran teachers used to make instructional decisions. Further research is needed to understand how to support teachers to prepare students for testing using effective teaching practices.     

Reports: Vanderbilt's New Change School

Abstract

In my experience, students of all races are hungering to be heard, to listen to others, and to have honest conversations about race and racism. I recently taught one course that brought out particularly clearly the challenges of teaching racially volatile material, of integrating personal experience and academic learning, and of negotiating the minefields of identity politics. It taught me the satisfactions of helping students cross racial barriers and of learning from one another.

The class—“Race and Racism”— met once a week. A master's-level course with a few doctoral students, it raised pedagogical issues similar to those I'd found teaching undergraduates. The class consisted of nine black students, of whom one was African (from Ethiopia), one Jamaican (but had spent most of her life in the United States), the rest African American; in addition, it included one Cuban American, one Filipino American, one Russian Jewish immigrant (seven years in this country), and one Japanese student who had only recently arrived in the United States. The remaining 13 students were white and non-Hispanic.     

Spaces to discuss mathematics: communities of practice on an online discussion board

In theories of learning that adopt a situated stance to knowledge the notion of identity is vital; how learners position themselves in relation to, and are mutually positioned by, the situation within which they are learning will have a strong bearing on the learning outcomes. One of the challenges for learning mathematics in school is that learners position themselves, and are positioned, as pupils rather than as mathematicians. This paper focuses on discussion boards designed for secondary school mathematics students, and we use Wenger's (1998) model of communities of practice, building on earlier work by the authors (Back and Pratt 2007; Pratt and Kelly 2007) in which ‘idealised communities’ are constructed and used, to consider a case study of one participant who engages in developing his identity as a mathematician doing mathematics, as well his identity as a learner and a teacher of mathematics.