Exploring the Limits of Frustrated Lewis Pair Chemistry with Alkynes: Detection of a System that Favors 1,1‐Carboboration over Cooperative 1,2‐P/B‐Addition

The zirconocene complex [{(C₆F₅)₂B‐(CH₂)₃‐Cp}(Cp‐PtBu₂)ZrCl₂] ( 6 ; Cp=cyclo‐C₅H₄) was prepared by hydroboration of [(allyl‐Cp)(Cp‐PtBu₂)ZrCl₂] ( 5 ) with HB(C₆F₅)₂ (“Piers’ borane”). It represents a frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) in which both the Lewis acid and the Lewis base were attached at the metallocene framework. Its reaction with 1‐pentyne did not result in the 1,2‐addition of or deprotonation reaction by the FLP, but rather in the 1,1‐carboboration of the triple bond, thereby obtaining a Z/E mixture (1.2:1) of the respective organometallic substituted alkenes 7 . The analogous reaction of 1‐pentyne with the phosphorous‐free system [{(C₆F₅)₂B‐(CH₂)₃‐Cp)}CpZrCl₂] ( 9 ) gave the respective 1,1‐carboboration products ( Z‐10 / E‐10 ≈1.3:1).     

Frustrated Lewis Pair Chemistry Derived from Bulky Allenyl and Propargyl Phosphanes

The dimesitylpropargylphosphanes mes₂P?CH₂?C≡C?R 6 a (R=H), 6 b (R=CH₃), 6 c (R=SiMe₃) and the allene mes₂P?C(CH₃)=C=CH₂ ( 8 ) were reacted with Piers’ borane, HB(C₆F₅)₂. Compound 6 a gave mes₂PCH₂CH=CH(B(C₆F₅)₂] ( 9 a ). In contrast, addition of HB(C₆F₅)₂ to 6 b and 6 c gave mixtures of 9 b (R=CH₃) and 9 c (R=SiMe₃) with the regioisomers mes₂P?CH₂?C[B(C₆F₅)₂]=CRH 2 b (R=CH₃) and 2 c (R=SiMe₃), respectively. Compounds 2 b , c underwent rapid phosphane/borane (P/B) frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) reactions under mild conditions. Compound 2 c reacted with nitric oxide (NO) to give the persistent FLP NO radical 11 . The systems 2 b , c cleaved dihydrogen at room temperature to give the respective phosphonium/hydridoborate products 13 b , c . Compound 13 c transferred the H⁺/H^? pair to a small series of enamines. Compound 13 c was also a metal‐free catalyst (5 mol %) for the hydrogenation of the enamines. The allene 8 reacted with B(C₆F₅)₃ to give the zwitterionic phosphonium/borate 17 . The ‐PPh₂‐substituted mes₂P‐propargyl system 6 d underwent a typical 1,2‐P/B‐addition reaction to the C≡C triple bond to form the phosphetium/borate zwitterion 20 . Several products were characterized by X‐ray diffraction.     

Functionalization of Intramolecular Frustrated Lewis Pairs by 1,1‐Carboboration with Conjugated Enynes

The vicinal P/B frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) Mes₂PCH₂CH₂B(C₆F₅)₂ undergoes 1,1‐carboboration reactions with the Me₃Si‐substituted enynes to give ring‐enlarged functionalized C₃‐bridged P/B FLPs. These serve as active FLPs in the activation of dihydrogen to give the respective zwitterionic [P]H⁺/[B]H^? products. One such product shows activity as a metal‐free catalyst for the hydrogenation of enamines or a bulky imine. The ring‐enlarged FLPs contain dienylborane functionalities that undergo “bora‐Nazarov”‐type ring‐closing rearrangements upon photolysis. A DFT study had shown that the dienylborane cyclization of such systems itself is endothermic, but a subsequent C₆F₅ migration is very favorable. Furthermore, substituted 2,5‐dihydroborole products are derived from cyclization and C₆F₅ migration from the photolysis reaction. In the case of the six‐membered annulation product, a subsequent stereoisomerization reaction takes place and the resultant compound undergoes a P/B FLP 1,2‐addition reaction with a terminal alkyne with rearrangement.     

Selective Metal‐free HB(C6F5)2 Catalyzed Allene Cyclotrimerization: Formation of 1,3,5‐Trimethylenecyclohexane and Its Tris‐hydroboration Product

Allene is cyclotrimerized under metal‐free conditions with the borane HB(C₆F₅)₂ catalyst to selectively give 1,3,5‐trimethylenecyclohexane ( 3 a ). Three‐fold hydroboration of the 1,3,5‐cyclotrimer with Piers’ borane gives the all‐cis 1,3,5‐CH₂B(C₆F₅)₂ substituted cyclohexane product 14 .     

Bifunctional Behavior of Unsaturated Intramolecular Phosphane–Borane Frustrated Lewis Pairs Derived from Uncatalyzed 1,4‐Hydrophosphination of a Dienylborane

Three unsaturated C₄‐bridged phospane/borane frustrated Lewis pairs (P/B FLPs) are prepared by uncatalyzed hydrophosphination of a dienylborane. The systems are bifunctional. Consequently, two examples undergo clean hydroboration reactions with HB(C₆F₅)₂ to yield B/B/P systems. The 1,4‐P/B system (C₆F₅)₂B?CH₂CH?CMeCH₂PMes₂ reacts with benzaldehyde initially by allylborane addition, followed by internal P/B FLP addition to the pendant C?C double bond, to yield a bicyclic product. The corresponding reaction of (C₆F₅)₂B?CH₂CH?CMeCH₂PtBu₂ stops at the allylborane/benzaldehyde addition product. The related system (C₆F₅)₂B?CH₂CH?CMeCH₂PPh₂ shows a similar bifunctional reaction pattern, whereby allylborane addition to benzaldehyde is combined with P/B addition to a second aldehyde equivalent to form the eight‐membered heterocyclic 1:2 addition product.     

Carboboration Reactions of 1,2‐Bis[(diarylphosphino)ethynyl]benzenes with Tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane

The 1,2‐bis[(diarylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene derivatives 1a (R=Ph) and 1b (R=o‐tolyl) undergo 1,1‐carboboration at one of their acetylene units upon treatment with (C₆F₅)₃B at elevated temperature to give the products 5a and 5b , respectively. At room temperature, we observed the formation of the corresponding phosphireniumborate zwitterions, 7a and 7b , respectively, which may be intermediates of the 1,1‐carboboration reactions. The reaction of the more bulky 1,2‐bis[(dimesitylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene 1c with (C₆F₅)₃B takes a different course. At 110°, we observed the complete conversion to the benzopentafulvene derivative 8 which is probably formed in a typical carbocation rearrangement sequence after the initial (C₆F₅)₃B Lewis acid‐addition step. The compounds 5a, 5b, 7b , and 8 were characterized by X‐ray crystal‐structure analyses.     

A 1,1‐Carboboration Route to Bora‐Nazarov Systems

Hydroboration of the conjugated enynes 1 a and 1 b with Piers’ borane [HB(C₆F₅)₂] gave the respective dienylboranes trans‐ 2 c and trans‐ 2 d . Their photolysis resulted in the formation of the dihydroborole products 3 c and 3 d . Both were converted to their pyridine adducts 5 c and 5 d , respectively. Compounds 3 c and 5 c,d were characterized by X‐ray diffraction. The reaction of the bis(enynyl)boranes 6 a and 6 b with B(C₆F₅)₃ resulted in the formation of the dihydroboroles 7 a and 7 b , respectively. This reaction is thought to proceed by 1,1‐carboboration of one of the enynyl substituents at boron to generate the dienylborane intermediates 8 a / 8 b , followed by thermally induced bora‐Nazarov ring‐closure and subsequent stabilizing 1,2‐pentafluorophenyl group migration from boron to carbon. Compound 7 a was characterized by X‐ray diffraction and solid‐state ¹¹B NMR spectroscopy.     

Developing Phospha‐Stork Chemistry Induced by a Borane Lewis Acid

Bulky vinyl phosphanes undergo carbon–carbon coupling with aryl aldehydes with the help of the Lewis acid B(C₆F₅)₃ to give isolable methylene phosphonium products. Dimesityl(vinyl)phosphane undergoes a phospha‐Stork reaction with bulky enones efficiently catalyzed by B(C₆F₅)₃ to eventually yield the corresponding substituted cyclobutane products.     

Inherent Stability Limits of Intramolecular Boron Nitrogen Lewis Acid–Base Pairs

The reaction of (C₆F₅)₂BH ( 1 ) with N,N‐dimethylallylamine ( 2 ), N,N‐diethylallylamine ( 3 ) and 1‐allylpiperidine ( 4 ) afforded the five‐membered ring systems (C₆F₅)₂B(CH₂)₃NR₂ (R=Me ( 5 ), Et ( 6 )) and (C₆F₅)₂B(CH₂)₃N(CH₂)₅ ( 7 ) with an intramolecular dative B? N bond. A different product was obtained from the reaction of (C₆F₅)₂BH ( 1 ) with N,N‐diisopropylallylamine ( 8 ), which afforded the seven‐membered ring system (C₆F₅)₂B(CH₂)₃N(iPr)CH(Me)CH₂ ( 9 ) under extrusion of dihydrogen. All compounds were characterised by elemental analysis, NMR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction experiments. Density functional theory (DFT) studies were performed to rationalise the different reaction mechanism for the formation of products 6 and 9 . The bonding situation of compound 9 was analysed in terms of its electron density topology to describe the delocalised nature of a borane– enamine adduct.     

The Propargyl Rearrangement to Functionalised Allyl‐Boron and Borocation Compounds

A diverse range of Lewis acidic alkyl, vinyl and aryl boranes and borenium compounds that are capable of new carbon–carbon bond formation through selective migratory group transfer have been synthesised. Utilising a series of heteroleptic boranes [PhB(C₆F₅)₂ ( 1 ), PhCH₂CH₂B(C₆F₅)₂ ( 2 ), and E‐B(C₆F₅)₂(C₆F₅)C=C(I)R (R=Ph 3 a , nBu 3 b )] and borenium cations [phenylquinolatoborenium cation ([QOBPh][AlCl₄], 4 )], it has been shown that these boron‐based compounds are capable of producing novel allyl‐ boron and boronium compounds through complex rearrangement reactions with various propargyl esters and carbamates. These reactions yield highly functionalised, synthetically useful boron substituted organic compounds with substantial molecular complexity in a one‐pot reaction.     

Borohydrides from Organic Hydrides: Reactions of Hantzsch’s Esters with B(C6F5)3

We report herein that the reaction between a series of Hantzsch’s ester analogues 1 a – d with the Lewis acidic species B(C₆F₅)₃ results in facile transfer of hydride to boron. The main products of this reaction are pyridinium borohydride salts 2 a – d , which are obtained in high to moderate yields. The N‐substituted substrates (N‐Me, N‐Ph) reacted in high yield 90–98 % and the connectivity of the products were confirmed by an X‐ray crystallographic analysis of the N‐Me borohydride salt 2 a . Unsubstituted Hanztsch’s ester 1 a reacted less effectively generating only 60 % of the corresponding borohydride salt, with the balance of the material sequestered as the ester‐bound Lewis acid–base adduct 3 a . Formation of the Lewis acid–base adduct could be minimized by increasing the steric bulk about the ester groups as in 1 d . The connectivity of the carbonyl‐bound adduct was confirmed by an X‐ray crystallographic analysis of 3 e the product of the reaction of methyl ketone 1 e with B(C₆F₅)₃. We also explored the generation of these pyridinium salts by employing frustrated Lewis pair methodology. However, the reaction of mixtures of the corresponding pyridine and B(C₆F₅)₃ with hydrogen gas only resulted in formation of trace amounts of the pyridinium borohydride, along with the Lewis acid–base adduct of the starting material and B(C₆F₅)₃. The 1,2‐dihydropyridine adduct was the final product of this reaction. This was ascribed to the low basicity of the pyridine nitrogen and the complicating formation of an ester bound Lewis acid–base adduct.     

Frustrated Lewis Pair Chemistry of Chiral (+)‐Camphor‐Based Aminoboranes

Dimethylamino‐(+)‐camphorenamine reacted with an equimolar amount of Piers’ borane, HB(C₆F₅)₂, to give the corresponding iminium–hydroborate zwitterionic salt. Being in equilibrium with the parent enamine–HB(C₆F₅)₂ N–B pair, this salt was able to split hydrogen heterolytically, hydrogenating the iminium group in the molecule. Detailed studies revealed that the hydrogen splitting in this reaction proceeded through an intermolecular pathway leading to a bornylamine–HB(C₆F₅)₂ adduct. When the starting enamine is present in excess over HB(C₆F₅)₂, the produced bornylamine–HB(C₆F₅)₂ adduct breaks up, eliminating free bornylamine and forming the initial camphorenamine– HB(C₆F₅)₂ pair. This results in hydrogenation of the camphorenamine framework in a catalytic fashion.     

Stable Borane Adducts of Alcoholates and Carboxylates

Six adducts of B(C₆F₅)₃ and archetypical alcoholates and carboxylates, were prepared and isolated as crystalline sodium crown ether salts, [Na(15‐crown‐5)][CH₃O · B(C₆F₅)₃] ( 1 ), [Na(15‐crown‐5)][CH₃CH₂O · B(C₆F₅)₃] ( 2 ), [Na(15‐crown‐5)][HCO₂ · B(C₆F₅)₃] ( 3 ), [Na(15‐crown‐5)][(H₃CCO₂ · B(C₆F₅)₃] ( 4 ), [Na(15‐crown‐5)][(F₃CCO₂ · B(C₆F₅)₃] ( 5 ), and [Na₂(15‐crown‐5)₃][C₂O₄ · 2 B(C₆F₅)₃] ( 6 ). All compounds were fully characterized by multinuclear NMR‐ and IR spectroscopy, ESI MS spectrometry, and X‐ray crystallography.     

Cyclisation versus 1,1‐Carboboration: Reactions of B(C6F5)3 with Propargyl Amides

A series of propargyl amides were prepared and their reactions with the Lewis acidic compound B(C₆F₅)₃ were investigated. These reactions were shown to afford novel heterocycles under mild conditions. The reaction of a variety of N‐substituted propargyl amides with B(C₆F₅)₃ led to an intramolecular oxo‐boration cyclisation reaction, which afforded the 5‐alkylidene‐4,5‐dihydrooxazolium borate species. Secondary propargyl amides gave oxazoles in B(C₆F₅)₃ mediated (catalytic) cyclisation reactions. In the special case of disubstitution adjacent to the nitrogen atom, 1,1‐carboboration is favoured as a result of the increased steric hindrance (1,3‐allylic strain) in the 5‐alkylidene‐4,5‐dihydrooxazolium borate species.     

An Ethylene‐Bridged Phosphane/Borane Frustrated Lewis Pair Featuring the ‐B(Fxyl)2 Lewis Acid Component

Hydroboration of dimesitylvinylphosphane with bis[3,5‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borane [HB(Fxyl)₂] gave the intramolecular ethylene‐bridged P/B frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) Mes₂PCH₂CH₂B(Fxyl)₂. The new compound underwent a variety of typical FLP reactions such as P/B‐addition to the carbonyl group of p‐chloro‐benzaldehyde. Cooperative N,N‐addition to nitric oxide gave the respective persistent P/B FLPNO^. radical, which readily reacted with 1,4‐cyclohexadiene by H‐atom abstraction to yield the corresponding P/B FLPNOH product. The B(Fxyl)₂‐containing FLP reacted as a template for the HB(C₆F₅)₂ reduction of carbon monoxide to the formyl stage to give the respective FLP(η²‐formylborane) product. Most products were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray crystal structure analysis.     

Benchmarking of DFT functionals for the kinetics and mechanisms of atmospheric addition reactions of OH radicals with phenyl and substituted phenyl‐based organic pollutants

^•OH addition reactions play a pivotal role in the atmospheric transformation of a number of phenyl and substituted phenyl‐based persistent and toxic organic pollutants. Here, we screened appropriate DFT functionals to predict reaction mechanisms and rate constants (k_OH) of the ^•OH additions by taking benzene and substituted benzenes (C₆H₅F, C₆H₅Cl, C₆H₅Br, C₆H₅CH₃, C₆H₅OH) as model compounds. By comparing the k_OH values calculated with DFT methods to experimental values, we found that the ωB97 functional is the best among the 18 functionals considered (using the basis sets 6‐31 + G(d,p) for optimizations and 6‐311++G(3df,2pd) for single point energy calculations) in the temperature range of 230‐330 K. In addition, we found that some other functionals performed well in specific conditions, e.g., BMKD3 is good for benzene, halogenated benzenes and C₆H₅CH₃, and CAM‐B3LYP is good for the reaction of C₆H₅OH at room temperature. Based on the diversity of the electronic structures of the selected model compounds and the frequent occurrence of certain substituents ( CH₃,  OH,  F,  Cl, and  Br) in the target compounds, the functionals recommended here can be used for future study of the reaction mechanisms and k_OH values for ^•OH addition to phenyl and substituted phenyl‐based persistent and toxic organic pollutants.     

Borane‐Catalyzed Cross‐Metathesis Strategy for Facile Transformation of Cyclic (Alkyl)(Amino)Germylenes

A borane B(C₆F₅)₃‐catalyzed metathesis reaction between the Si?C bond in the cyclic (alkyl)(amino)germylene (CAAGe) 1 and the Si?H bond in a silane (R₃SiH; 2 ) is reported. Mechanistic studies propose that the initial step of the reaction involves Si?H bond activation to furnish an ionic species [ 1 ‐SiR₃]⁺[HB(C₆F₅)₃]^?, from which [Me₃Si]⁺[HB(C₆F₅)₃]^? and an azagermole intermediate are generated. The former yields Me₃SiH concomitant with the regeneration of B(C₆F₅)₃ whereas the latter undergoes isomerization to afford CAAGes bearing various silyl groups on the carbon atom next to the germylene center. This strategy allows the straightforward synthesis of eight new CAAGes starting from 1 .     

Ring Construction by 1,1-Carboboration; Making Anthracene Derivatives from a Tetra(alkynyl)benzene

1,2,4,5-Tetrakis(trimethylsilylethynyl)benzene reacted with two molar equivalents of the boranes R−B(C₆F₅)₂ (R=C₆F₅, Me, Ph) in a series of sequential 1,1-carboboration reactions to give ca. 1 : 1 mixtures of the two-fold benzannulated products, namely the respective C_2h and C_2v symmetric tetra-silyl, bis-boryl substituted anthracenes. Their active B(C₆F₅)₂ substituents were used for consecutive Suzuki-Miyaura C−C coupling reactions to give boron-free phenyl or 2-pyridyl substituted anthracene products.     

Synthesis and Characterization of the 1 : 1-Adducts of In(C6F5)3 with Acetonitrile,Glyme, and DMAP (DMAP = 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine), and [PNP][In(C6F5)4] (PNP = bis(triphenylphosphinanyliden)immonium) – the Crystal Structure of [PNP][In(C6F5)4]

In(C₆F₅)₃ · CH₃CN and In(C₆F₅)₃ · glyme were synthesized from InCl₃ and Cd(C₆F₅)₂ in CH₃CN or glyme in 43% and 35% yield, respectively. Replacement of CH₃CN or (C₂H₅)₂O by DMAP yielded the corresponding 1 : 1-adduct. [PNP][In(C₆F₅)₄] was best prepared from the corresponding cesium salt which was best synthesized from the reaction of stoichiometric amounts of In(C₆F₅)₃ · CH₃CN, (CH₃)₃ SiC₆F₅ and CsF in good yield. [PNP][In(C₆F₅)₄] crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1, a = 1104.9(4) pm, b = 1442.4(6) pm, c = 1833.8(8) pm, α = 110.87(2)°, β = 92.04(3)°, γ = 96.55(3)°, Z = 2.     

Influence of Cyclopentadienyl Ring‐Tilt on Electron‐Transfer Reactions: Redox‐Induced Reactivity of Strained [2] and [3]Ruthenocenophanes

In contrast to ruthenocene [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)₂] and dimethylruthenocene [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄Me)₂] ( 7 ), chemical oxidation of highly strained, ring‐tilted [2]ruthenocenophane [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CH₂)₂] ( 5 ) and slightly strained [3]ruthenocenophane [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CH₂)₃] ( 6 ) with cationic oxidants containing the non‐coordinating [B(C₆F₅)₄]^? anion was found to afford stable and isolable metal?metal bonded dicationic dimer salts [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CH₂)₂]₂[B(C₆F₅)₄]₂ ( 8 ) and [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CH₂)₃]₂[B(C₆F₅)₄]₂ ( 17 ), respectively. Cyclic voltammetry and DFT studies indicated that the oxidation potential, propensity for dimerization, and strength of the resulting Ru?Ru bond is strongly dependent on the degree of tilt present in 5 and 6 and thereby degree of exposure of the Ru center. Cleavage of the Ru?Ru bond in 8 was achieved through reaction with the radical source [(CH₃)₂NC(S)S?SC(S)N(CH₃)₂] (thiram), affording unusual dimer [(CH₃)₂NCS₂Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η³‐C₅H₄)C₂H₄]₂[B(C₆F₅)₄]₂ ( 9 ) through a haptotropic η⁵–η³ ring‐slippage followed by an apparent [2+2] cyclodimerization of the cyclopentadienyl ligand. Analogs of possible intermediates in the reaction pathway [C₆H₅ERu(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂C₂H₄][B(C₆F₅)₄] [E=S ( 15 ) or Se ( 16 )] were synthesized through reaction of 8 with C₆H₅E?EC₆H₅ (E=S or Se).