Syntheses and characterization of cyano-bridged homo and hetero bimetallic complexes containing η and η-cyclic hydrocarbons

The reactions of [(ind)Ru(PPh₃)₂CN] (ind = η⁵-C₉H₇) (1) and [CpRu(PPh₃)₂CN] (Cp = η⁵-C₅H₅) (2) with [(η⁶-p-cymene)Ru(bipy)Cl]Cl (bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine) (3) in the presence of AgNO₃/NH₄BF₄ in methanol, respectively, yielded dicationic cyano-bridged complexes of the type [(ind)(PPh₃)₂Ru(μ-CN)Ru(bipy)(η⁶-p-cymene)](BF₄)₂ (4) and [Cp(PPh₃)₂Ru(μ-CN)Ru(bipy)(η⁶-p-cymene)](BF₄)₂ (5). The reaction of [CpRu(PPh₃)₂CN] (2), [CpOs(PPh₃)₂CN] (6) and [CpRu(dppe)CN] (7) with the corresponding halide complexes and [(η⁶-p-cymene)RuCl₂]₂ formed the monocationic cyano-bridge complexes [Cp(PPh₃)₂Ru(μ-CN)Os(PPh₃)₂Cp](BF₄) (8), [Cp(PPh₃)₂Os(μ- CN)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp](BF₄) (9) and [Cp(dppe)Ru(μ-CN)Os(PPh₃)₂Cp](BF₄) (10) along with the neutral complexes [Cp(PPh₃)₂Ru(μ-CN)Ru (η⁶-p-cymene)Cl₂] (11), [Cp(PPh₃)₂Os(μ-CN)Ru(η⁶-p-cymene)Cl₂] (12), and [Cp(dppe) Ru(μ-CN)Ru(η⁶-p-cymene)Cl₂] (13). These complexes were characterized by FT IR, ¹H NMR, ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy and the molecular structures of complexes 4, 8 and 11 were solved by X-ray diffraction studies.     

Ruthenium complexes of hexakis(cyanophenyl)[3]radialenes and their di(cyanophenyl)methane precursors: synthesis,photophysical, and electrochemical properties

The coordination chemistry of cross-conjugated ligands and the effect of cross-conjugation on the nature of metal–metal and metal–ligand interactions have received limited attention. To explore the effects of cross-conjugation eight ruthenium complexes were synthesized, mononuclear complexes of two isomeric cross-conjugated [3]radialenes [RuCp(PPh₃)₂(L)]PF₆ and [{RuCp*(dppe)}(L)]PF₆ (L?=?hexakis(4-cyanophenyl)[3]radialene, 2; hexakis(3-cyanophenyl)[3]radialene, 3), and dinuclear complexes [{RuCp(PPh₃)₂}₂(L)](PF₆)₂ and [{RuCp*(dppe)}₂(L)](PF₆)₂ of the diarylmethane precursors (L?=?4,4′-dicyanodiphenylmethane, 4; 3,3′-dicyanodiphenylmethane, 5) to the [3]radialenes. Considerable synthetic challenges allowed only clean isolation of mononuclear complexes of the multidentate radialenes 2 and 3. As expected, coordinating a positively charged metal induces a red shift for the π–π* transition in complexes of ligand 2, but unexpectedly a blue shift for the same transition in complexes of 3 was observed. This points to conformational differences for the [3]radialene in the ruthenium complexes of the para- (2) versus meta- (3) substituted hexaaryl[3]radialenes. Cyclic voltammetry indicates that the methylene spacer in 4 and 5 does not enable any interaction between metal centers and the absorption behavior is essentially as observed for [Ru(NCPh)(PPh₃)₂Cp]PF₆ and [Ru(NCPh)(dppe)Cp*]PF₆ but generally with a slight red shift in absorbance maxima.     

Reactivity Studies of η5‐ Indenyl and η5‐Cp* Ruthenium(II) Complexes towards some Polypyridyl Ligands

The reaction of [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl], where; L³ = C₉H₇ ( 1 ), C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ( 2 ) with acetonitrile in the presence of [NH₄][PF₆] yielded cationic complexes [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)][PF₆]; L³= C₉H₇ ([3]PF₆) and L³ = C₅Me₅ ([4]PF₆), respectively. Complexes [3]PF₆ and [4]PF₆ reacts with some polypyridyl ligands viz, 2,3‐bis (α‐pyridyl) pyrazine (bpp), 2,3‐bis (α‐pyridyl) quinoxaline (bpq) yielding the complexes of the formulation [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)(L²)]PF₆ where; L³ = C₉H₇, L² = bpp, ([5]PF₆), L³ = C₉H₇, L² = bpq, ([6]PF₆); L³ = C₅Me₅, L² = bpp, ([7]PF₆) and bpq, ([8]PF₆), respectively. However reaction of [(η⁵‐C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)][PF₆] ([3]PF₆) with the sterically demanding polypyridyl ligands, viz. 2,4,6‐tris(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine (tptz) or tetra‐2‐pyridyl‐1,4‐pyrazine (tppz) leads to the formation of unexpected complexes [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L²)(CH₃CN)][PF₆]₂; L² = tppz ([9](PF₆)₂), tptz ([11](PF₆)₂) and [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L²)Cl][PF₆]; L² = tppz ([10]PF₆), tptz ([12]PF₆). The complexes were isolated as their hexafluorophosphate salts. They have been characterized on the basis of micro analytical and spectroscopic data. The crystal structures of the representative complexes were established by X‐ray crystallography.     

Acetylene Dithiolate Linking up the [Tp′W(CO)(CN)] Moiety with RuII or PdII

A series of heterodinuclear complexes with acetylene dithiolate (acdt^2?) as the bridging moiety were synthesised by a facile one‐pot procedure that avoided use of the highly elusive acetylene dithiol. Generation of the W–Ru complex [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] (Tp’=hydrotris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)borate) and the W–Pd complexes [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)] and [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)][PF₆] (dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphoshino)ethane), which exhibit a [W(η²‐κ²‐C₂S₂)M] core (M=Ru, Pd), was accomplished by using a transition‐metal‐assisted solvolytical removal of the Me₃Si‐ethyl thiol protecting groups. All intermediate species of the reaction have been fully characterised. The highly coloured W–Ru complex [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] shows reversible redox chemistry, as does the prototype complex [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)][PF₆]. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction and IR, EPR and UV/Vis spectroscopic studies in conjunction with DFT calculations prove the high electronic delocalisation of states over the acdt^2? linker. Comparative studies revealed a higher donor strength and more pronounced dithiolate character of acdt^2? in [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] relative to [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)]⁺. In addition, the influence of the overall complex charge on the metric parameters was investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies with the W–Pd complexes [Tp′WL₂(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)] (L=(CN^?)(CO) or (CO)₂). The central [W(C₂S₂)Pd] units exhibit high structural similarity, which indicates the extensive delocalisation of charge over both metals.     

Some ruthenium complexes containing cyanocarbon ligands: syntheses, structures and extent of electronic communication in binuclear systems

The preparation of several ruthenium complexes containing cyanocarbon anions is reported. Deprotonation (KOBu^t) of [Ru(NCCH₂CN)(PPh₃)₂Cp]PF₆ (1) gives Ru{NCCH(CN)}(PPh₃)₂Cp (2), which adds a second [Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp]⁺ unit to give [{Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp}₂(μ-NCCHCN)]⁺ (3). Attempted deprotonation of the latter to give the μ-NCCCN complex was unsuccessful. Similar chemistry with tricyanomethanide anion gives Ru{NCC(CN)₂}(PPh₃)₂Cp (4) and [{Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp}₂{μ-NCC(CN)CN}]PF₆ (5), and with pentacyanopropenide, Ru{NCC(CN)C(CN)C(CN)₂}(PPh₃)₂Cp (6) and [{Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp}₂{μ-NCC(CN)C(CN)C(CN)CN}]PF₆ (7). The Ru(dppe)Cp* analogues of 6 and 7 (8 and 9) were also prepared. Thermolysis of 6 (refluxing toluene, 12 h) results in loss of PPh₃ and formation of the binuclear cyclic complex {Ru(PPh₃)Cp[μ-NC{C(CN)C(CN)₂}CN]}₂ (10). The solid-state structures of 2-4 and 8-10 have been determined and the nature of the isomers shown to be present in solutions of the binuclear cations 7 and 9 by NMR studies has been probed using Hartree-Fock and density functional theory.     

Comparative reactivity studies of dppf-containing CpRu and (C6Me6)Ru complexes towards different donor ligands (dppf=1,1-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene)

[CpRu(dppf)Cl] (Cp=η⁵-C₅H₅) (1) and [(HMB)Ru(dppf)Cl]PF₆ ((HMB)=η⁶-C₆Me₆) (3) react with different donor ligands to give rise to N-, P- and S-bonded complexes. The stoichiometric reactions of 1 and 3 with NaNCS give the mononuclear complexes [CpRu(dppf)(NCS)] (2) and [(HMB)Ru(dppf)(NCS)]PF₆ (4), respectively, in yields above 80%, while 3 also gives a dppf-bridged diruthenium complex [(HMB)Ru(NCS)₂]₂(μ-dppf) (5) in 67% yield from reaction with four molar equivalents of NaNCS. Compound 5 is also obtained in 70% yield from the reaction of 4 with excess NaNCS. With CH₃CN in the presence of salts, both 1 and 3 give their analogous solvento derivatives [CpRu(dppf)(CH₃CN)]BPh₄ (6) and [(HMB)Ru(dppf)(CH₃CN)] (PF₆)₂ (7). With phosphines, the reaction of 1 gives chloro-displaced complexes [(CpRu(dppf)L]PF₆ (L =PMe₃ (8), PMe₂Ph(9)), whereas the reaction of 3 with PMe₂Ph leads to substitution of dppf, giving [(HMB)Ru(PMe₂Ph)₂Cl] PF₆ (10). The reaction of 1 with NaS₂CNEt₂ gives a dinuclear dppf-bridged complex [{CpRu(S₂CNEt₂)}₂(μ-dppf)] (11), whereas that of 3 results in loss of the HMB ligand giving a mononuclear complex [Ru(dppf)(S₂CNEt₂)₂] (12). With elemental sulfur S₈, 1 is oxidized to give a dinuclear CpRu^III dppf-chelated complex [{CpRu(dppf)}₂(μ-S₂)](BPh₄)Cl (13), whereas 3 undergoes oxidation at the ligand, giving a dppf-displaced complex [(HMB)Ru(CH₃CN)₂Cl]PF₆ (14) and free dppfS₂. The structures of 1, 2, 5-9, 11, 13 and 14 were established by X-ray single crystal diffraction analyses. Of these, 5 and 11 both contain a dppf-bridge between Ru^II centers, while 13 is a dinuclear CpRu^III disulfide-bridged complex; all the others are mononuclear. All complexes obtained were also spectroscopically characterized.     

Studies of η5-cyclichydrocarbon ruthenium(II) complexes containing para-amino-N-(pyrid-2-ylmethylene)phenylamine ligand: molecular structure of [(η5-C5H5)Ru(PPh3)(C5H4NCH=N-C6H4-p-NH2)]BF4

Reaction of [(η⁵-Cp)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl] (1) with excess para-amino-N-(pyrid-2-ylmethylene)-phenylamine ligand (app) in methanol in the presence of NH₄BF₄ leads to the formation of [η⁵-CpRu(PPh₃)(aap)]BF₄ (6BF₄). Similarly, [(η⁵-ind)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)]BF₄ (4BF₄) and [(η⁵-Cp*)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)]BF₄ (5BF₄) react with app to yield the cationic complexes [(η⁵-ind)Ru(PPh₃)(app)]BF₄ (7BF₄) and [(η⁵-Cp*)Ru(PPh₃)(app)]BF₄ (8BF₄), respectively. The complexes were characterized by analysis and spectroscopic data. The structure of a representative complex (6BF₄) was established by single-crystal X-ray methods.     

Further Evidence for ‘Extended’ Cumulene Complexes: Derivatives from Reactions with Halide Anions and Water

Reactions of [Ru{C=C(H)-1,4-C₆H₄C≡CH}(PPh₃)₂Cp]BF₄ ([ 1 a ]BF₄) with hydrohalic acids, HX, results in the formation of [Ru{C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C(X)=CH₂}(PPh₃)₂Cp] [X=Cl ( 2 a-Cl ), Br ( 2 a-Br )], arising from facile Markovnikov addition of halide anions to the putative quinoidal cumulene cation [Ru(=C=C=C₆H₄=C=CH₂)(PPh₃)₂Cp]⁺. Similarly, [M{C=C(H)-1,4-C₆H₄-C≡CH}(LL)Cp ]BF₄ [M(LL)Cp’=Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp ([ 1 a ]BF₄); Ru(dppe)Cp* ([ 1 b ]BF₄); Fe(dppe)Cp ([ 1 c ]BF₄); Fe(dppe)Cp* ([ 1 d ]BF₄)] react with H⁺/H₂O to give the acyl-functionalised phenylacetylide complexes [M{C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C(=O)CH₃}(LL)Cp’] ( 3 a – d ) after workup. The Markovnikov addition of the nucleophile to the remote alkyne in the cations [ 1 a–d ]⁺ is difficult to rationalise from the vinylidene form of the precursor and is much more satisfactorily explained from initial isomerisation to the quinoidal cumulene complexes [M(=C=C=C₆H₄=C=CH₂)(LL)Cp’]⁺ prior to attack at the more exposed, remote quaternary carbon. Thus, whilst representative acetylide complexes [Ru(C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C≡CH)(PPh₃)₂Cp] ( 4 a ) and [Ru(C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C≡CH)(dppe)Cp*] ( 4 b ) reacted with the relatively small electrophiles [CN]⁺ and [C₇H₇]⁺ at the β-carbon to give the expected vinylidene complexes, the bulky trityl ([CPh₃]⁺) electrophile reacted with [M(C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C≡CH)(LL)Cp’] [M(LL)Cp’=Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp ( 4 a ); Ru(dppe)Cp* ( 4 b ); Fe(dppe)Cp ( 4 c ); Fe(dppe)Cp* ( 4 d )] at the more exposed remote end of the carbon-rich ligand to give the putative quinoidal cumulene complexes [M{C=C=C₆H₄=C=C(H)CPh₃}(LL)Cp’]⁺, which were isolated as the water adducts [M{C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C(=O)CH₂CPh₃}(LL)Cp’] ( 6 a–d ). Evincing the scope of the formation of such extended cumulenes from ethynyl-substituted arylvinylene precursors, the rather reactive half-sandwich (5-ethynyl-2-thienyl)vinylidene complexes [M{C=C(H)-2,5-^cC₄H₂S-C≡CH}(LL)Cp’]BF₄ ([ 7 a – d ]BF₄ add water readily to give [M{C≡C-2,5-^cC₄H₂S-C(=O)CH₃}(LL)Cp’] ( 8 a – d )].     

Formation of an Acyl‐Ethynyl‐Methylidyne Complex of Cobalt: Structure of Co3{μ3‐CC(O)C≡C[Ru(dppe)Cp*]}(CO)8(PPh3)

The reaction between Ru(C≡CH)(dppe)Cp* and Co₃(μ₃‐CBr)(CO)₉ in the presence of Pd(PPh₃)₄/CuI afforded dark red Co₃{μ₃‐CC(O)C≡C[Ru(dppe)Cp*]}(CO)₈(PPh₃), whose formation may involve attack of the Ru‐ethynyl fragment on an intermediate cluster‐bound CCO ligand; abstraction of PPh₃ from the palladium catalyst also occurs.     

Transformation of neutral rhenium compounds during electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

Four neutral rhenium compounds were examined by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Acetonitrile solutions of (Ind)Re(CO)₃ (Ind = indenyl) and (Cp)Re(CO)₃ (Cp = cyclopentadienyl) gave rise to [Re(CO)₃(CH₃CN)₃]⁺ ions. This is indicative of a reaction with the solvent, although these compounds do not react with acetonitrile under regular laboratory conditions. In contrast, (Ind)Re(CO)₂(butyne) and (Cp)Re(CO)₂(butyne) did not lose their aromatic hydrocarbon ligand upon ionization; the predominant product ions generated upon electrospray ionization were [(Ind)Re(CO)(CH₃CN)(butyne)]⁺ and [(Cp)Re(CO)(CH₃CN)(butyne)]⁺, respectively.