共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 796 毫秒
1.
If the second order problem u(t) + Bu(t) + Au(t) = f(t), u(0) =u(0) = 0 has L^p-maximal regularity, 1 〈 p 〈 ∞, the analyticity of the corresponding propagator of the sine type is shown by obtaining the estimates of ‖λ(λ^2 + λB + A)^-1‖ and ‖B(λ^2 + λB + A)^-1‖ for λ∈ C with Reλ 〉 ω, where the constant ω≥ 0. 相似文献
2.
Osamu Hatori Takeshi Miura Rumi Shindo Hiroyuki Takagi 《Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo》2010,59(2):161-183
Let $
A
$
A
and ℬ be unital semisimple commutative Banach algebras. It is shown that if surjections S,T: $
A
$
A
→ ℬ with S(1)=T(1)= 1 and α ∈ ℂ \ {0} satisfy r(S(a)T(b) − α)= r(ab− α) for all a,b ∈ $
A
$
A
, then S=T and S is a real algebra isomorphism, where r(a) is the spectral radius of a. Let I be a nonempty set, A and B be uniform algebras. Let ρ, τ: I → A and S,T: I → B be maps satisfying σ
π
(S(p)T(q)) ⊂ σ
π
(ρ(p) τ(q)) for all p,q ∈ I, where σ
π
(f) is the peripheral spectrum of f. Suppose that the ranges ρ(I), τ(I) ⊂ A and S(I),T(I) ⊂ B are closed under multiplication in a sense, and contain peaking functions “enough”. There exists a homeomorphism ϕ: Ch(B)→Ch(A) such that S(p)(y)= ρ(p)(ϕ(y)) and T(p)(y)= τ(p)(ϕ(y)) for every p ∈ I and y ∈ Ch(B), where Ch(A) is the Choquet boundary of A. 相似文献
3.
This note studies the Chern-Simons invariant of a closed oriented Riemannian 3-manifold M. The first achievement is to establish the formula CS(e) - CS(e) = degA, where e and e are two (global) frames of M, and A : M → SO(3) is the "difference" map. An interesting phenomenon is that the "jumps" of the Chern-Simons integrals for various frames of many 3-manifolds are at least two, instead of one. The second purpose is to give an explicit representation of CS(e+) and CS(e_), where e+ and e_ are the "left" and "right" quaternionic frames on M3 induced from an immersion M^3 → E^4, respectively. Consequently we find many metrics on S^3 (Berger spheres) so that they can not be conformally embedded in E^4. 相似文献
4.
Let A and B denote two families of subsets of an n-element set. The pair (A,B) is said to be ℓ-cross-intersecting iff |A∩B|=ℓ for all A∈ A and B∈B. Denote by P
e
(n) the maximum value of |A||B| over all such pairs. The best known upper bound on P
e
(n) is Θ(2
n
), by Frankl and R?dl. For a lower bound, Ahlswede, Cai and Zhang showed, for all n ≥ 2ℓ, a simple construction of an ℓ-cross-intersecting pair (A,B) with |A||B| = $
\left( {{*{20}c}
{2\ell } \\
\ell \\
} \right)
$
\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
{2\ell } \\
\ell \\
\end{array} } \right)
2
n−2ℓ
= Θ(2
n
/$
\sqrt \ell
$
\sqrt \ell
), and conjectured that this is best possible. Consequently, Sgall asked whether or not P
e
(n) decreases with ℓ. 相似文献
5.
We consider one-phase (formal) asymptotic solutions in the Kuzmak-Whitham form for the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation and for the Korteweg-de Vries equation.
In this case, the leading asymptotic expansion term has the form X(S(x, t)/h+Φ(x, t), I(x, t), x, t) +O(h), where h ≪ 1 is a small parameter and the phase S}(x, t) and slowly changing parameters I(x, t) are to be found from the system of “averaged” Whitham equations. We obtain the equations for the phase shift Φ(x, t) by studying the second-order correction to the leading term. The corresponding procedure for finding the phase shift is
then nonuniform with respect to the transition to a linear (and weakly nonlinear) case. Our observation, which essentially
follows from papers by Haberman and collaborators, is that if we incorporate the phase shift Φ into the phase and adjust the
parameter Ĩ by setting $
\tilde S
$
\tilde S
= S +hΦ+O(h
2),Ĩ = I + hI
1 + O(h
2), then the functions $
\tilde S
$
\tilde S
(x, t, h) and Ĩ(x, t, h) become solutions of the Cauchy problem for the same Whitham system but with modified initial conditions. These functions
completely determine the leading asymptotic term, which is X($
\tilde S
$
\tilde S
(x, t, h)/h, Ĩ(x, t, h), x, t) + O(h). 相似文献
6.
In this paper, we obtain a version of subordination lemma for hyperbolic disk relative to hyperbolic geometry on the unit disk D. This subordination lemma yields the distortion theorem for Bloch mappings f ∈ H(B^n) satisfying ||f||0 = 1 and det f'(0) = α ∈ (0, 1], where||f||0 = sup{(1 - |z|^2 )n+1/2n det(f'(z))[1/n : z ∈ B^n}. Here we establish the distortion theorem from a unified perspective and generalize some known results. This distortion theorem enables us to obtain a lower bound for the radius of the largest univalent ball in the image of f centered at f(0). When a = 1, the lower bound reduces to that of Bloch constant found by Liu. When n = 1, our distortion theorem coincides with that of Bonk, Minda and Yanagihara. 相似文献
7.
Let A and B be Banach function algebras on compact Hausdorff spaces X and Y and let ‖.‖
X
and ‖.‖
Y
denote the supremum norms on X and Y, respectively. We first establish a result concerning a surjective map T between particular subsets of the uniform closures of A and B, preserving multiplicatively the norm, i.e. ‖Tf Tg‖
Y
= ‖fg‖
X
, for certain elements f and g in the domain. Then we show that if α ∈ ℂ {0} and T: A → B is a surjective, not necessarily linear, map satisfying ‖fg + α‖
X
= ‖Tf Tg + α‖
Y
, f,g ∈ A, then T is injective and there exist a homeomorphism φ: c(B) → c(A) between the Choquet boundaries of B and A, an invertible element η ∈ B with η(Y) ⊆ {1, −1} and a clopen subset K of c(B) such that for each f ∈ A,
$
Tf\left( y \right) = \left\{ \begin{gathered}
\eta \left( y \right)f\left( {\phi \left( y \right)} \right) y \in K, \hfill \\
- \frac{\alpha }
{{\left| \alpha \right|}}\eta \left( y \right)\overline {f\left( {\phi \left( y \right)} \right)} y \in c\left( B \right)\backslash K \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right.
$
Tf\left( y \right) = \left\{ \begin{gathered}
\eta \left( y \right)f\left( {\phi \left( y \right)} \right) y \in K, \hfill \\
- \frac{\alpha }
{{\left| \alpha \right|}}\eta \left( y \right)\overline {f\left( {\phi \left( y \right)} \right)} y \in c\left( B \right)\backslash K \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right.
相似文献
8.
Rajendra Bhatia 《印度理论与应用数学杂志》2010,41(1):99-111
Lipschitz continuity of the matrix absolute value |A| = (A*A)1/2 is studied. Let A and B be invertible, and let M
1 = max(‖A‖, ‖B‖), M
2 = max(‖A
−1‖, ‖B
−1‖). Then it is shown that
|