Effect of stationary phase structure on retention and selectivity tuning in the high-throughput separation of tocopherol isomers by HPLC

Four stationary phases containing different groups such as: C18, C30, alkylamide, and cholesterolic, were presented for simultaneous HPLC analysis of structural isomers of tocopherol. Especially, the influence of stationary phase structure and properties on tuning of the highly selective HPLC separation of beta- and gamma-tocopherol pair demonstrating, respectively, para- and ortho- arrangement of methyl substituents on the 6-chromanol ring, has been elucidated. It was pointed out that selectivity of each stationary phase has been a result of modulation in the mass transfer and set of unspecific interactions in the tertiary system comprising analyte <==> stationary phase <==> mobile phase. Differences in observed retention and specific selectivity of tocopherols together with the stationary phase structure investigations indicated that a spatial organization changing of chemically bonded ligands as predominantly a solvation consequence. Additional molecular modeling studies preliminary explained some of these complicated supramolecular phenomena which caused that cholesterolic stationary phase offered beneficial performance in screening of tocopherols by HPLC and biomimetic studies of not completely recognized interactions of tocopherol isomers and biological membranes.     

Enhancement of selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

In an effort to gain insight into the relationship between stationary phase solvation and selectivity, the use of short- and medium-chained-length alcohols (methanol, n-propanol, n-butanol, and n-pentanol) as mobile phase modifiers in reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) was investigated to determine their impact on chromatographic selectivity. A wide range of mobile phase compositions was evaluated because of the large effect exerted by solvent strength on selectivity. Employing a set of six vanillin compounds as retention probes, evidence is presented to support the view that an increase in the hydrophobicity of the organic modifier used in RPLC can increase the selectivity of the C18 alkyl bonded phase while simultaneously decreasing the retention time of the eluting solutes. Thus, we are presented with an interesting paradox: higher selectivity and shorter retention times, which can be attributed to changes in either solvent selectivity and/or stationary phase solvation by the organic modifier.     

A unified classification of stationary phases for packed column supercritical fluid chromatography

The use of supercritical fluids as chromatographic mobile phases allows to obtain rapid separations with high efficiency on packed columns, which could favour the replacement of numerous HPLC methods by supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) ones. Moreover, despite some unexpected chromatographic behaviours, general retention rules are now well understood, and mainly depend on the nature of the stationary phase. The use of polar stationary phases improves the retention of polar compounds, when C18-bonded silica favours the retention of hydrocarbonaceous compounds. In this sense, reversed-phase and normal-phase chromatography can be achieved in SFC, as in HPLC. However, these two domains are clearly separated in HPLC due to the opposite polarity of the mobile phases used for each method. In SFC, the same mobile phase can be used with both polar and non-polar stationary phases. Consequently, the need for a novel classification of stationary phases in SFC appears, allowing a unification of the classical reversed- and normal-phase domains. In this objective, the paper presents the development of a five-dimensional classification based on retention data for 94-111 solutes, using 28 commercially available columns representative of three major types of stationary phases. This classification diagram is based on a linear solvation energy relationship, on the use of solvation vectors and the calculation of similarity factors between the different chromatographic systems. This classification will be of great help in the choice of the well-suited stationary phase, either in regards of a particular separation or to improve the coupling of columns with complementary properties.     

System Maps for Retention of Small Neutral Compounds on a Superficially Porous Ethyl-Bridged,Octadecylsiloxane-Bonded Silica Stationary Phase in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

The system constants of the solvation parameter model are used to prepare system maps for the retention of small neutral compounds on an ethyl-bridged, ocatadecylsiloxane-bonded superficially porous silica stationary phase (Kinetex EVO C18) for aqueous mobile phases containing 10–70% (v/v) methanol or acetonitrile. Electrostatic interactions (cation-exchange) are important for the retention of weak bases with acetonitrile–water but not methanol–water mobile phase compositions. Compared with a superficially porous octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex C18) with a similar morphology but different topology statistically significant differences in selectivity at the 95% confidence level are observed for neutral compounds that vary by size and hydrogen-bond basicity with other intermolecular interactions roughly similar. These selectivity differences are dampened with acetonitrile–water mobile phases, but are significant for methanol–water mobile phase compositions containing <30% (v/v) methanol. A comparison of a totally porous ethyl-bridged, octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (XBridge C18) with Kinetex EVO C18 indicated that they are effectively selectivity equivalent.     

Retention properties of novel β-CD bonded stationary phases in reversed-phase HPLC mode

With the given special structures, the CD bonded stationary phases are expected to have complementary retention properties with conventional C18 stationary phase, which will be helpful to enhance the polar selectivity in RP mode separation. In this work, two β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) bonded stationary phases for reversed-phase HPLC, including 1, 12-dodecyldiol linked β-CD stationary phase (CD1) and olio (ethylene glycol) (OEG) linked β-CD stationary phase (CD2), have been synthesized via click chemistry. The resulting materials were characterized with FT-IR and elemental analysis, which proved the successful immobilization of ligands. The similarities and differences in retention characteristics between the CD and C18 stationary phases have been elucidated by using comparative linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs). The force related to solute McGowan volume has no significant difference, while the hydrogen bonding and dipolar interactions between solutes and CD stationary phases are stronger than between solutes and C18, which is attributed to the special structures (CD and triazole groups) of CD stationary phases. Chemical origins are interpreted by comparison between CD1 and CD2. Similar dispersive interactions of CD1 and CD2 are attributed to their similar length of spacer arms. CD2 which contains OEG spacer arm has relative weaker HBD acidity but stronger HBA basicity. CD stationary phases display no serious different methylene selectivity and higher polar selectivity than in the case of C18. Higher acid selectivity and lower basic selectivity are observed on CD2 than on CD1. Distinctive retention properties and good complementary separation selectivity to C18 make the novel CD bonded stationary phases available for more application in RPLC.     

Insights into the Retention Mechanism on a Pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-Bonded Silica Stationary Phase (Discovery HS F5) in RP-LC

The solvation parameter model is used to elucidate the retention mechanism of neutral compounds on the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Discovery HS F5) with methanol-water and acetonitrile-water mobile phases containing from 10 to 70% (v/v) organic solvent. The dominant factors that increase retention are solute size and electron lone pair interactions while polar interactions reduce retention. A comparison of the retention mechanism with an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase based on the same silica substrate and with a similar bonding density (Discovery HS C18) provides additional insights into selectivity differences for the two types of stationary phase. The methanol-water solvated pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase is more cohesive and/or has weaker dispersion interactions and is more dipolar/polarizable than the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase. Differences in hydrogen-bonding interactions contribute little to relative retention differences. For mobile phases containing more than 30% (v/v) acetonitrile selectivity differences for the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded and octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases are no more than modest with differences in hydrogen-bond acidity of greater importance than observed for methanol-water. Below 30% (v/v) acetonitrile selectivity differences are more marked owing to incomplete wetting of the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase at low volume fractions of acetonitrile that are not apparent for the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase. Steric repulsion affects a wider range of compounds on the octadecylsiloxane-bonded than pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase with methanol mobile phases resulting in additional selectivity differences than predicted by the solvation parameter model. Electrostatic interactions with weak bases were unimportant for methanol-water mobile phase compositions in contrast to acetonitrile-water where ion-exchange behavior is enhanced, especially for the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase. The above results are compatible with a phenomenological interpretation of stationary phase conformations using the haystack, surface accessibility, and hydro-linked proton conduit models.     

Retention properties of acetone-water mobile phases on a biphenylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

The solvation parameter model system constants and retention factors were used to interpret retention properties of 39 calibration compounds on a biphenylsiloxane-bonded stationary phase (Kinetex biphenyl) for acetone-water binary mobile phase systems containing 30–70% v/v. Variation in system constants, phase ratios, and retention factors of acetone-water binary mobile phases systems were compared with more commonly used acetonitrile and methanol mobile phase systems. Retention properties of acetone mobile phases on a Kinetex biphenyl column were more similar to that of acetonitrile than methanol mobile phases except with respect to selectivity equivalency. Importantly, selectivity differences arising between acetone and acetonitrile systems (the lower hydrogen-bond basicity of acetone-water mobile phases and differences in hydrogen-bond acidity, cavity formation and dispersion interactions) could be exploited in reversed-phase liquid chromatography method development on a Kinetex biphenyl stationary phase.     

Insights into the Retention Mechanism for Small Neutral Compounds on Silica-Based Phenyl Phases in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

The system constants of the solvation parameter model are used to prepare system maps for the retention of small neutral compounds on phenylhexylsiloxane- and pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded superficially porous silica stationary phases (Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl and Kinetex F5) for aqueous mobile phases containing 10–70% (v/v) methanol or acetonitrile. Electrostatic interactions (cation exchange) are important for the retention of weak bases for acetonitrile–water mobile phases, but virtually absent for the same compounds for methanol–water mobile phases. The selectivity of the Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl stationary phase for small neutral compounds is similar to an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase with similar morphology Kinetex C-18 for both methanol–water and acetonitrile–water mobile phase compositions. The Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl and XBridge Phenyl stationary phases with the same topology but different morphology are selectivity equivalent, confirming that solvation of the interphase region can be effective at dampening selectivity differences for modern stationary phases. Small selectivity differences observed for XTerra Phenyl (different morphology and topology) confirm previous reports that the length and type of space arm for phenylalkylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases can result in small changes in selectivity. The pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex F5) has similar separation properties to the phenylhexylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases, but is not selectivity equivalent. However, for method development purposes, the scope to vary separations from an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex C-18) to “phenyl phase” of the types studied here is limited for small neutral compounds. In addition, selectivity differences for the above stationary phases are enhanced by methanol–water and largely suppressed by acetonitrile–water mobile phases. For bases, larger selectivity differences are possible for the above stationary phases if electrostatic interactions are exploited, especially for acetonitrile-containing mobile phases.     

Insights into the Retention Mechanism of Small Neutral Compounds on Octylsiloxane-Bonded and Diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-Bonded Silica Stationary Phases in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

The system constants of the solvation parameter model are used to prepare system maps for the retention of small neutral compounds on an octylsiloxane-bonded (Kinetex C8) and diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-bonded (Kinetex XB-C18) superficially porous silica stationary phases for aqueous mobile phases containing 10–70% (v/v) methanol or acetonitrile. Electrostatic interactions (cation-exchange) are important for the retention of weak bases with acetonitrile–water but not for methanol–water mobile phases. Compared with an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex C18) retention is reduced due to a less favorable phase ratio for both the octylsiloxane-bonded and diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases while selectivity differences are small and solvent dependent. Selectivity differences for neutral compounds are larger for methanol–water but significantly suppressed for acetonitrile–water mobile phases. The selectivity differences arise from small changes in all system constants with solute size and hydrogen-bond basicity being the most important due to their dominant contribution to the retention mechanism. Exchanging the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica column for either the octylsiloxane-bonded or diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-bonded silica column affords little scope for extending the selectivity space and is restricted to fine tuning of separations, and in some cases, to obtain faster separations due to a more favorable phase ratio. For weak bases larger differences in relative retention are expected with acetonitrile–water mobile phases on account of the additional cation exchange interactions possible that are absent for the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase.     

Hypercrosslinked polystyrene as a novel type of high-performance liquid chromatography column packing material. Mechanisms of retention

An experimental material, Chromalite 5HGN (Purolite, UK), that represents hypercrosslinked polystyrene as a new type of neutral stationary phase for HPLC was examined. The material contains no functional groups, but is compatible with any kind of nonpolar and highly polar mobile phase, and even with water. It is chemically resistant and thermally stable. When using aqueous organic mobile phases, Chromalite 5HGN works similar to standard C18 reversed-phase packings, but is characterized by much greater hydrophobicity and, sometimes, unusual selectivity. When using nonpolar mobile phases, i.e. under "quasi normal-phase" conditions, the retention is mostly governed by the interactions between pi-electronic systems of the adsorbent and adsorbate. Adding highly polar, even hydrophilic solvents into the mobile phase, leads to a shift of retention times toward the "reversed-phase" kind of chromatography, which gives an additional possibility in fine tuning the column selectivity.     

Characterization of stationary phases in subcritical fluid chromatography by the solvation parameter model. I. Alkylsiloxane-bonded stationary phases

Varied types of alkylsiloxane-bonded and fluoroalkylsiloxane-bonded stationary phases, all commercially available, were investigated with subcritical fluid mobile phase. The effect of the alkyl chain length (from C4 to C18) and of the nature of the bonding (fluorodecylsiloxane, phenyl-C18 and polar-embedded-C18) on the chromatographic behaviour was investigated by the use of a linear solvation energy relationship (LSER), the solvation parameter model. A large set of test compounds provides precise and reliable information on the intermolecular interactions responsible for retention on these stationary phases used with a subcritical mobile phase. First of all, the results underline the close properties between subcritical fluid and organic liquid. The use of non aqueous mobile phases reduces the cavity energy and the mobile phase acidity generally encountered with aqueous liquid phases, allowing other interactions to take a part in retention. As expected, an increase in the alkyl chain length favours the dispersive interactions between the solutes and the stationary phases. Changes in basicity and acidity of the stationary phases are also related to the chain length, but, in this case, mobile phase adsorption onto the stationary phase is supposed to explain these behaviours. The addition of a phenyl group at the bottom of the C18 chain, near the silica, does not induce great modifications in the retentive properties. The fluorodecylsiloxane and the polar-embedded alkylsiloxane phases display very different properties, and can be complementary to the classical alkylsiloxane-bonded phases. In particular, the fluorinated phase does not favour the dispersive interactions, in comparison to hydrogenated stationary phases, when the basicity of the polar-embedded phase is obviously greater than the one of classical alkylsiloxane-bonded phases, due to the amide function. Finally, logk-logk curves plotted between the different phases illustrate the effect of the interaction properties on the retention of different classes of compounds.